[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx

**## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

### Case Case Study Analysis

Study Analysis


An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

**To prepare:**

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

**The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

By day 7 of Week 8

**Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
**Day 7 of Week 8.**

**Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

## image1.jpeg

**## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

### Case Case Study Analysis

Study Analysis


An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

**To prepare:**

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

**The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

By day 7 of Week 8

**Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
**Day 7 of Week 8.**

**Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

## image1.jpeg