[Solved] WK750

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see attached

**files (3)**

– ## ResearchDesignProject-QuantitativePre-MatrixGradingRubric.pdf

– ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixAssignmentInstructions.docx
– ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixTemplate.docx

**## ResearchDesignProject-QuantitativePre-MatrixGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided full
article reference with
hyperlink and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
with hyperlink and
both narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using a basic research
design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used an
applied one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from article. Does not
correctly identify
quantitative research
design (non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gives incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference with hyperlink,
narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only.
Supported rationale
for how it is known
that the study used a
basic or applied
research design
including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using an applied
research design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used a
basic one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Not
Present
0

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
an applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic or
Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Gave clear,
concise, and detailed
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or applied
research design
supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not correctly identify
study using the correct
overall design (basic OR
applied research design
that used quantitative
methods only). Rationale
for how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic OR
applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Content:
Biblical
Integration

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Clearly connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
detail using at least 5
sentences supporting
each question with a
different Bible verse.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
at least 3 sentences
supporting each
question with a
different Bible verse.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not make a clear
connection with how
research design is
encapsulated in a biblical
worldview and/or used less
than 3 sentences, and/or
does not support each
question with a different
Bible verse.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure:
Mechanics/APA
Format

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and
grammar are used
throughout the
pre-matrix. There are
0–2 errors in grammar
or spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are 0–2
minor errors in current
APA format.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

There are 3–5 errors
in grammar or
spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are
3-4 minor errors in
current APA format.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

There are 6+ errors in
spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that
distract the reader from the
content. AND/OR There are
5+ errors in current APA
format.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Structure:
Zip-file with
Articles

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Provided copies of all 3
articles identified in the
template in PDF
format.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Provided copies of all
3 articles identified in
the template, but not
all in PDF format.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Provided fewer than the
required 3 articles and/or
the articles were not the
ones identified in the
template.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Structure: Ai
Integration

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The student clearly
identified and ethically
used M365 Copilot for
one research design
component in a single
study, includes a
complete and relevant
AI conversation after
the references, and
integrated the
AI-generated content
accurately and
thoughtfully into the
pre-matrix.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The student used
M365 Copilot for one
study as instructed,
but the AI
conversation or
integration lacks
clarity, completeness,
or minor accuracy.
The component is
mostly appropriate
but may need
revision.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

The student misused AI
(e.g., uses it for multiple
studies or fails to identify its
use), omitted the AI
conversation, or provided
inaccurate or poorly
integrated content in the
pre-matrix.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Total Points: 135

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixAssignmentInstructions.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixassignmentinstructions-docx)

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixTemplate.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixtemplate-docx)

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixTemplate.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixtemplate-docx)

**## ResearchDesignProject-QuantitativePre-MatrixGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided full
article reference with
hyperlink and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
with hyperlink and
both narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using a basic research
design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used an
applied one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from article. Does not
correctly identify
quantitative research
design (non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gives incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference with hyperlink,
narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only.
Supported rationale
for how it is known
that the study used a
basic or applied
research design
including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using an applied
research design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used a
basic one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Not
Present
0

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
an applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic or
Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Gave clear,
concise, and detailed
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or applied
research design
supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not correctly identify
study using the correct
overall design (basic OR
applied research design
that used quantitative
methods only). Rationale
for how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic OR
applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Content:
Biblical
Integration

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Clearly connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
detail using at least 5
sentences supporting
each question with a
different Bible verse.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
at least 3 sentences
supporting each
question with a
different Bible verse.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not make a clear
connection with how
research design is
encapsulated in a biblical
worldview and/or used less
than 3 sentences, and/or
does not support each
question with a different
Bible verse.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure:
Mechanics/APA
Format

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and
grammar are used
throughout the
pre-matrix. There are
0–2 errors in grammar
or spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are 0–2
minor errors in current
APA format.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

There are 3–5 errors
in grammar or
spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are
3-4 minor errors in
current APA format.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

There are 6+ errors in
spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that
distract the reader from the
content. AND/OR There are
5+ errors in current APA
format.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Structure:
Zip-file with
Articles

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Provided copies of all 3
articles identified in the
template in PDF
format.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Provided copies of all
3 articles identified in
the template, but not
all in PDF format.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Provided fewer than the
required 3 articles and/or
the articles were not the
ones identified in the
template.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Structure: Ai
Integration

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The student clearly
identified and ethically
used M365 Copilot for
one research design
component in a single
study, includes a
complete and relevant
AI conversation after
the references, and
integrated the
AI-generated content
accurately and
thoughtfully into the
pre-matrix.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The student used
M365 Copilot for one
study as instructed,
but the AI
conversation or
integration lacks
clarity, completeness,
or minor accuracy.
The component is
mostly appropriate
but may need
revision.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

The student misused AI
(e.g., uses it for multiple
studies or fails to identify its
use), omitted the AI
conversation, or provided
inaccurate or poorly
integrated content in the
pre-matrix.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Total Points: 135

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixAssignmentInstructions.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixassignmentinstructions-docx)

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixTemplate.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixtemplate-docx)

**## ResearchDesignProject-QuantitativePre-MatrixGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided full
article reference with
hyperlink and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
article. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
with hyperlink and
both narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using a basic research
design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used an
applied one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from article. Does not
correctly identify
quantitative research
design (non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gives incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference with hyperlink,
narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only. Gave
clear, concise, and
detailed rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic or
applied research
design supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with an applied
research design that
used quantitative
methods only.
Supported rationale
for how it is known
that the study used a
basic or applied
research design
including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Incorrectly identified study
as using an applied
research design that used
quantitative methods only
when it actually used a
basic one. Rationale for
how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Not
Present
0

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
an applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Content:
Quantitative
Research
Article Basic or
Applied

25 to >22 pts

Advanced

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Gave clear,
concise, and detailed
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or applied
research design
supported with
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook.
Correctly identified
specific quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or
true experimental)
providing clear,
concise, and detailed
support for how this is
known (including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook.
Provided full article
reference and both
narrative and
parenthetical in-text
citations.

22 to >20 pts

Proficient

Correctly identified a
study with a basic OR
applied research
design that used
quantitative methods
only. Supported
rationale for how it is
known that the study
used a basic or
applied research
design including
page/paragraph from
both article and
textbook. Correctly
identified specific
quantitative research
design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
or true experimental)
providing support for
how this is known
(including
page/paragraph) from
both article and
textbook. Provided
full article reference
and both narrative
and parenthetical
in-text citations.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not correctly identify
study using the correct
overall design (basic OR
applied research design
that used quantitative
methods only). Rationale
for how it is known that the
study used a basic
research or applied design
is not included and/or is not
clear and/or does not
include page/paragraph
from both article and
textbook. Did not correctly
identify quantitative
research design
(non-experimental,
quasi-experimental, or true
experimental) and/or does
not provide support for how
this is known (including
page/paragraph) from both
article and textbook. Is
missing or gave incomplete
information for one or more
of the following: article
reference, narrative, and/or
parenthetical in-text
citations.

0 pts

Not
Present

Did NOT
correctly
identify a
study with
a basic OR
applied
research
design that
used
quantitative
methods
only.

25 pts

Content:
Biblical
Integration

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Clearly connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
detail using at least 5
sentences supporting
each question with a
different Bible verse.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Connected how
research design is
encapsulated in a
biblical worldview in
at least 3 sentences
supporting each
question with a
different Bible verse.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Did not make a clear
connection with how
research design is
encapsulated in a biblical
worldview and/or used less
than 3 sentences, and/or
does not support each
question with a different
Bible verse.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure:
Mechanics/APA
Format

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and
grammar are used
throughout the
pre-matrix. There are
0–2 errors in grammar
or spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are 0–2
minor errors in current
APA format.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

There are 3–5 errors
in grammar or
spelling that distract
the reader from the
content. There are
3-4 minor errors in
current APA format.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

There are 6+ errors in
spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that
distract the reader from the
content. AND/OR There are
5+ errors in current APA
format.

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Structure:
Zip-file with
Articles

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Provided copies of all 3
articles identified in the
template in PDF
format.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Provided copies of all
3 articles identified in
the template, but not
all in PDF format.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Provided fewer than the
required 3 articles and/or
the articles were not the
ones identified in the
template.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Structure: Ai
Integration

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The student clearly
identified and ethically
used M365 Copilot for
one research design
component in a single
study, includes a
complete and relevant
AI conversation after
the references, and
integrated the
AI-generated content
accurately and
thoughtfully into the
pre-matrix.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The student used
M365 Copilot for one
study as instructed,
but the AI
conversation or
integration lacks
clarity, completeness,
or minor accuracy.
The component is
mostly appropriate
but may need
revision.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

The student misused AI
(e.g., uses it for multiple
studies or fails to identify its
use), omitted the AI
conversation, or provided
inaccurate or poorly
integrated content in the
pre-matrix.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Total Points: 135

Research Design Project: Quantitative Pre-Matrix Grading Rubric |
EDUC750_B11_202630

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixAssignmentInstructions.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixassignmentinstructions-docx)

**ResearchDesignProjectQuantitativePreMatrixTemplate.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdesignprojectquantitativeprematrixtemplate-docx)