Category: Environmental science > Environmental science Analysis

  • [Solved] OSHA VIII JL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## UnitVIIIJournal.docx – ## UnitVIII.pdf **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx** Your company is looking to purchase a small chemical company in Southern California. The company produces commodity organic chemicals that are used as building blocks to synthesize complex molecules fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## UnitVIIIJournal.docx

    – ## UnitVIII.pdf

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Your company is looking to purchase a small chemical company in Southern California. The company produces commodity organic chemicals that are used as building blocks to synthesize complex molecules for use in the pharmaceutical industry. Identify the air quality management districts in Southern California and the requirements of state implementation plans (SIP) that you find that are in effect for the small company. Make a recommendation to management to go forward with the acquisition or to consider other options in their growth strategy.

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitVIII.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize important environmental safety and health-related laws.
    1.1 Apply information from the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of

    Chemicals (GHS) to a given scenario.

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory services.
    2.1 Analyze a safety data sheet (SDS).
    2.2 Recommend the proper procedures for handling a hazardous substance.
    2.3 Discuss the measures that should be taken when using a hazardous substance in a

    manufacturing operation.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The document below is the GHS that was referenced in the unit lesson. Please read Chapters 1.1 through 1.5
    (the Introduction section). It will give you an overview of this important document and help you complete the
    assignment for this unit.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Chemicals are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because they have the potential to
    adversely impact human health and the environment. The environmental regulations are designed to
    minimize exposure. The purpose of this unit is to present the hazard classification scheme and to show the
    criteria used to measure hazard categories. The hazards are classified, which allows those coming into
    contact with the chemicals to understand their threat and to have the necessary information to determine if
    the chemical can be used safely in the facility.

    Chemical Classifications

    As the markets for chemicals grew and as workers, consumers, and the environment began to experience
    adverse effects from their use, countries around the world began to implement chemical programs to manage
    toxic chemicals and their hazards. Each country set up its own system for classifications, labeling, and the
    definitions they applied to toxic, hazardous, dangerous, safe, etc. What was classified as hazardous in one
    country was toxic in another, and what was considered to be safe in one place was restricted and controlled
    in another. When trade in chemicals and their products experienced an upsurge in world markets, it was
    impossible for regulators, customs, and end users to understand and make sense of the hazards identified on
    product labels. The United Nations recognized that international trade would become restricted unless a
    common and consistent international safety standard was used across the globe to classify chemicals and to

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Chemical Classifications and
    the Communications of Hazards

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    represent their hazards. This classification system became known as the Globally Harmonized System of
    Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and also included requirements for safety data sheets (SDSs)
    and container labels (Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], n.d.).

    The GHS classification system categorizes hazards into the following three categories:

    1. physical/chemical hazards;
    2. human and mammalian toxicity; and
    3. environmental toxicity.

    There are more than 28 categories of hazards that are aligned with nine hazard pictograms (United Nations
    Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE], 2017). The GHS is reviewed by a United Nations committee
    every 2 years at which time new hazard categories and criteria are implemented. While the GHS is intended
    to be a unifying system that harmonizes the identification and communication of hazards, it has not
    accomplished this in its roll out. The GHS is voluntary, and countries that want to participate in international
    trade are choosing to adopt it into their national laws. Countries are not required to adopt all of the GHS
    system as they can pick and choose what elements of GHS they want to incorporate into their national
    regulations.

    For example, Europe, China, and Japan have adopted all elements of the GHS, whereas the United States
    and Canada have not adopted the environmental elements of the GHS. In Europe, it is easy to identify
    products that are harmful to the environment. However, in the United States, environmental hazards are not
    mentioned because only OSHA agreed to adopt the GHS, and the elements affecting worker safety became a
    part of the U.S. standard. The EPA did not agree to adopt the environmental elements of GHS because this
    would conflict with current programs that the EPA had in place. Canada followed the U.S. lead. Health
    Canada adopted the same elements as the U.S. OSHA while Environment Canada followed the lead of the
    U.S. EPA.

    Examples of physical hazard include the categories of explosives, flammable solids and liquids, self-reacting,
    and heating substances and mixtures. Examples of health hazards include acute toxicity; skin and eye
    corrosion/irritation; skin and respiratory sensitizer; and carcinogen, mutagen, and reproductive toxicant.
    Environmental hazards include the categories of acute and chronic aquatic toxicity and hazardous to the
    ozone layer (UNECE, 2017). Each of these categories have defined criteria that are used to classify the
    hazards of a chemical or mixture.

    Communication of Hazards

    The hazards of a product are communicated via the SDS and the container label. The SDS is a 16-section
    document starting with the identity of the chemical and the manufacturer. Section 2 identifies the product
    hazards. It lists the GHS categories and subcategories for each of the applicable 28 hazards. The applicable
    pictogram is provided along with a signal word indicating danger or warning (UNECE, 2017). Hazard
    statements are also provided that list the specific hazard indicated by the pictograms. It takes all three
    elements (pictogram, signal word, and hazard statement) to understand the hazards of each product.
    Following the designation of the hazards, precautionary statements follow that help to define the safe use of
    the product and, if implemented, will help to mitigate the hazards of the product.

    Section 3 of the SDS lists the individual chemical substances and complexes that contribute to the product
    classification (UNECE, 2017). For products that are mixtures of chemicals, it is not uncommon to see multiple
    chemicals listed in Section 3 along with their Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number and their approximate
    percentage in the product.

    Other sections of the SDS cover first aid measures, firefighting measures, accidental release measures, and
    handling and storage precautions. The storage section contains warnings that require the separation of acids
    and bases as well as the separation of oxidizers and reducing agents. For very dangerous chemicals, a
    recommendation is often made to quarantine these and lock them into a limited access area. Section 8 of the
    SDS contains important information for the site industrial hygienist. Chemical substances in the mixture that
    have an OSHA exposure standard are listed with the allowable exposure value. These standards can be time

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    weighted averages, short-term exposure levels, permissible exposure limits, and any state-specific standards
    published for their list of chemicals of concern (UNECE, 2017).

    The industrial hygiene lead can reference these exposure limits to set up monitoring for employees and the
    facility to measure exposure levels against the standards. If any recommended level is exceeded,
    administrative controls, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment can be put into place to
    protect the employee. It is not uncommon to see enhanced ventilation and equipment in enclosures that put a
    barrier between the chemical and the employee. Section 8 also lists supplier recommendations from the
    manufacturer. These include recommendations for face shields, chemical-resistant gloves, long-sleeve
    clothing, and chemical-resistant sleeves that keep clothing dry and clean (UNECE, 2017). No one wants to
    expose their family to chemical hazards when they take contaminated clothing home to be washed.

    Section 9 lists the physical/chemical properties of the substance (UNECE, 2017). Vapor density will indicate if
    it is a chemical that will sink to the floor or rise into the air; imagine crawling along the floor to avoid smoke
    from a fire only to be fully exposed to a toxic chemical that has a density heavier than air. Section 9 will
    indicate if a chemical is water-soluble. In the event of a spill, hoses are often used to wash material into a
    floor drain. A water-soluble chemical that dissolves in the wash water is carried down the floor drain to an
    onsite treatment system ultimately making its way into a river where the chemical can have adverse effects on
    aquatic life for years to come. Section 10 discusses the stability and reactivity of the chemical. It is in this
    section that the rationale for putting chemicals into segregated storage are explained (UNECE, 2017).

    Sections 11 and 12 of the SDS provide toxicity data for individual chemicals (UNECE, 2017). If the
    manufacturer has tested the product and has toxicity data, this is where it is included. However, testing is
    expensive, and for low-volume products, testing cannot be justified. There is website from the European
    Chemicals Agency (ECHA) that contains a wealth of information on the chemicals from European
    manufacturers and importers who have completed mandatory testing protocols to support a chemical
    registration. Section 12 is a similar section that provides environmental data and effects (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 13 covers disposal considerations, but because of a multitude of local laws and requirements, most
    SDS will advise companies seeking to dispose of product as a waste to consult local authorities and comply
    with local regulations (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 14 summarizes transport information for ground, air, and sea (UNECE, 2017). Transport
    classifications are aligned with GHS classifications because this was intentionally done in United Nations
    committees that developed the hazard classifications for GHS. Shippers can reference the information in
    Section 14 to identify packaging, volume limitations, and placarding requirements (Canadian Centre for
    Occupational Health and Safety, 2017).

    Section 15 addresses regulatory requirements that may apply to the chemicals (UNECE, 2017). For example,
    if the chemical has a reportable quantity (RQ) where an immediate notification is to be made to responsible
    authorities, the RQ value is given in this section. Finally, Section 16 is a catchall section where manufacturers
    can put additional information that may be important to their customers or in the markets were the product is
    sold (UNECE, 2017).

    Besides the SDS, the container label is a snapshot of the SDS because it is meant to give a shipper,
    warehouse worker, firefighter, or other person coming into contact with the chemical a visual of the hazards
    by simply glancing at the label. The pictograms indicate the type of hazard that is associated with the product
    giving a warning that the product may be an explosive, a health hazard, or that it is harmful to the
    environment. The supplemental text on the label provides additional details but not at the level given in the
    SDS. The elements on the label are chosen to present the most important hazard information and mitigation
    recommendations to those who come into contact with multiple products and containers throughout the day.

    The United Nations committee that developed the GHS would like to have every product tested for each of
    the hazard categories. They recognized that there are not enough testing facilities and that the cost would
    keep many products and innovations from reaching the market. The committee took the step to conservatively
    classify products based on individual chemical ingredients. For example, if a chemical contains an impurity
    that is a carcinogen, it must be considered in the product classification if it exists in the product at a level of
    0.1% (UNECE, 2017). The entire product is subsequently classified as a carcinogen. Similarly, if a chemical
    contains an acid at a level >3% in the product, the entire product will be classified as a corrosive to skin and

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    eyes (UNECE, 2017). If the manufacturer or importer makes the effort to test the product, the test results will
    often indicate that the product is not a corrosive but an irritant. By being conservative in the assumptions used
    to classify a product, the market decides when testing is necessary to adjust the product classification to meet
    specifications of key customers. However, to remove a carcinogen classification, the testing is very expensive
    and of long durations. In this situation, the carcinogen classification becomes a driver for companies to invest
    in research and development to find a greener, less-toxic chemical that still fulfills the performance
    requirements for the product.

    Conclusion

    In summary, having information about the chemical hazards of a product allows a hazard assessment to be
    done to determine if the product will fit into the manufacturing facility with its current level of engineering
    controls and personal protective equipment used by workers. If the hazards require additional levels of
    protection, additional controls and ventilation can be incorporated into the manufacturing operations. To
    minimize the need for these protections, it is still best to find ways to reformulate and redesign products to
    minimize the use of toxic chemicals and to eliminate hazards from the facility.

    References

    Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2017). OSH answers fact sheets: Transportation of

    dangerous goods (TDG) – classification. Government of Canada.
    https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/legisl/tdg/tdg_classification.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The globally harmonized system for hazard

    communication. United States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    United Nations. (2017). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (7th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev07/English/ST_SG_AC10_30_R
    ev7e.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The GHS was discussed in detail in the unit lesson, and you read the overview as part of the required reading
    for this unit. It is important to be familiar with this document, so take a few minutes to peruse it in its entirety.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Scenario: You are cleaning out your shed and find an unopened bottle of a cleaning product. As you read the
    list of ingredients on the label, you see that the product contains benzene. Using the internet, find a safety
    data sheet (SDS) for benzene (CAS 71-43-2). Read through the hazards in Section 2, and list the hazards
    associated with benzene. Based on your list, what hazard concerns you most? Will you choose to use the
    product or dispose of it as a waste? Find a product in your storage area, and repeat this exercise for the
    ingredients on the label. Note: to find the CAS number, use the internet to search for it. For example, you can
    Google the CAS number for phenol.

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Introduction
    – Chemical Classifications
    – Communication of Hazards
    – Conclusion
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIII.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize important environmental safety and health-related laws.
    1.1 Apply information from the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of

    Chemicals (GHS) to a given scenario.

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory services.
    2.1 Analyze a safety data sheet (SDS).
    2.2 Recommend the proper procedures for handling a hazardous substance.
    2.3 Discuss the measures that should be taken when using a hazardous substance in a

    manufacturing operation.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The document below is the GHS that was referenced in the unit lesson. Please read Chapters 1.1 through 1.5
    (the Introduction section). It will give you an overview of this important document and help you complete the
    assignment for this unit.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Chemicals are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because they have the potential to
    adversely impact human health and the environment. The environmental regulations are designed to
    minimize exposure. The purpose of this unit is to present the hazard classification scheme and to show the
    criteria used to measure hazard categories. The hazards are classified, which allows those coming into
    contact with the chemicals to understand their threat and to have the necessary information to determine if
    the chemical can be used safely in the facility.

    Chemical Classifications

    As the markets for chemicals grew and as workers, consumers, and the environment began to experience
    adverse effects from their use, countries around the world began to implement chemical programs to manage
    toxic chemicals and their hazards. Each country set up its own system for classifications, labeling, and the
    definitions they applied to toxic, hazardous, dangerous, safe, etc. What was classified as hazardous in one
    country was toxic in another, and what was considered to be safe in one place was restricted and controlled
    in another. When trade in chemicals and their products experienced an upsurge in world markets, it was
    impossible for regulators, customs, and end users to understand and make sense of the hazards identified on
    product labels. The United Nations recognized that international trade would become restricted unless a
    common and consistent international safety standard was used across the globe to classify chemicals and to

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Chemical Classifications and
    the Communications of Hazards

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    represent their hazards. This classification system became known as the Globally Harmonized System of
    Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and also included requirements for safety data sheets (SDSs)
    and container labels (Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], n.d.).

    The GHS classification system categorizes hazards into the following three categories:

    1. physical/chemical hazards;
    2. human and mammalian toxicity; and
    3. environmental toxicity.

    There are more than 28 categories of hazards that are aligned with nine hazard pictograms (United Nations
    Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE], 2017). The GHS is reviewed by a United Nations committee
    every 2 years at which time new hazard categories and criteria are implemented. While the GHS is intended
    to be a unifying system that harmonizes the identification and communication of hazards, it has not
    accomplished this in its roll out. The GHS is voluntary, and countries that want to participate in international
    trade are choosing to adopt it into their national laws. Countries are not required to adopt all of the GHS
    system as they can pick and choose what elements of GHS they want to incorporate into their national
    regulations.

    For example, Europe, China, and Japan have adopted all elements of the GHS, whereas the United States
    and Canada have not adopted the environmental elements of the GHS. In Europe, it is easy to identify
    products that are harmful to the environment. However, in the United States, environmental hazards are not
    mentioned because only OSHA agreed to adopt the GHS, and the elements affecting worker safety became a
    part of the U.S. standard. The EPA did not agree to adopt the environmental elements of GHS because this
    would conflict with current programs that the EPA had in place. Canada followed the U.S. lead. Health
    Canada adopted the same elements as the U.S. OSHA while Environment Canada followed the lead of the
    U.S. EPA.

    Examples of physical hazard include the categories of explosives, flammable solids and liquids, self-reacting,
    and heating substances and mixtures. Examples of health hazards include acute toxicity; skin and eye
    corrosion/irritation; skin and respiratory sensitizer; and carcinogen, mutagen, and reproductive toxicant.
    Environmental hazards include the categories of acute and chronic aquatic toxicity and hazardous to the
    ozone layer (UNECE, 2017). Each of these categories have defined criteria that are used to classify the
    hazards of a chemical or mixture.

    Communication of Hazards

    The hazards of a product are communicated via the SDS and the container label. The SDS is a 16-section
    document starting with the identity of the chemical and the manufacturer. Section 2 identifies the product
    hazards. It lists the GHS categories and subcategories for each of the applicable 28 hazards. The applicable
    pictogram is provided along with a signal word indicating danger or warning (UNECE, 2017). Hazard
    statements are also provided that list the specific hazard indicated by the pictograms. It takes all three
    elements (pictogram, signal word, and hazard statement) to understand the hazards of each product.
    Following the designation of the hazards, precautionary statements follow that help to define the safe use of
    the product and, if implemented, will help to mitigate the hazards of the product.

    Section 3 of the SDS lists the individual chemical substances and complexes that contribute to the product
    classification (UNECE, 2017). For products that are mixtures of chemicals, it is not uncommon to see multiple
    chemicals listed in Section 3 along with their Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number and their approximate
    percentage in the product.

    Other sections of the SDS cover first aid measures, firefighting measures, accidental release measures, and
    handling and storage precautions. The storage section contains warnings that require the separation of acids
    and bases as well as the separation of oxidizers and reducing agents. For very dangerous chemicals, a
    recommendation is often made to quarantine these and lock them into a limited access area. Section 8 of the
    SDS contains important information for the site industrial hygienist. Chemical substances in the mixture that
    have an OSHA exposure standard are listed with the allowable exposure value. These standards can be time

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    weighted averages, short-term exposure levels, permissible exposure limits, and any state-specific standards
    published for their list of chemicals of concern (UNECE, 2017).

    The industrial hygiene lead can reference these exposure limits to set up monitoring for employees and the
    facility to measure exposure levels against the standards. If any recommended level is exceeded,
    administrative controls, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment can be put into place to
    protect the employee. It is not uncommon to see enhanced ventilation and equipment in enclosures that put a
    barrier between the chemical and the employee. Section 8 also lists supplier recommendations from the
    manufacturer. These include recommendations for face shields, chemical-resistant gloves, long-sleeve
    clothing, and chemical-resistant sleeves that keep clothing dry and clean (UNECE, 2017). No one wants to
    expose their family to chemical hazards when they take contaminated clothing home to be washed.

    Section 9 lists the physical/chemical properties of the substance (UNECE, 2017). Vapor density will indicate if
    it is a chemical that will sink to the floor or rise into the air; imagine crawling along the floor to avoid smoke
    from a fire only to be fully exposed to a toxic chemical that has a density heavier than air. Section 9 will
    indicate if a chemical is water-soluble. In the event of a spill, hoses are often used to wash material into a
    floor drain. A water-soluble chemical that dissolves in the wash water is carried down the floor drain to an
    onsite treatment system ultimately making its way into a river where the chemical can have adverse effects on
    aquatic life for years to come. Section 10 discusses the stability and reactivity of the chemical. It is in this
    section that the rationale for putting chemicals into segregated storage are explained (UNECE, 2017).

    Sections 11 and 12 of the SDS provide toxicity data for individual chemicals (UNECE, 2017). If the
    manufacturer has tested the product and has toxicity data, this is where it is included. However, testing is
    expensive, and for low-volume products, testing cannot be justified. There is website from the European
    Chemicals Agency (ECHA) that contains a wealth of information on the chemicals from European
    manufacturers and importers who have completed mandatory testing protocols to support a chemical
    registration. Section 12 is a similar section that provides environmental data and effects (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 13 covers disposal considerations, but because of a multitude of local laws and requirements, most
    SDS will advise companies seeking to dispose of product as a waste to consult local authorities and comply
    with local regulations (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 14 summarizes transport information for ground, air, and sea (UNECE, 2017). Transport
    classifications are aligned with GHS classifications because this was intentionally done in United Nations
    committees that developed the hazard classifications for GHS. Shippers can reference the information in
    Section 14 to identify packaging, volume limitations, and placarding requirements (Canadian Centre for
    Occupational Health and Safety, 2017).

    Section 15 addresses regulatory requirements that may apply to the chemicals (UNECE, 2017). For example,
    if the chemical has a reportable quantity (RQ) where an immediate notification is to be made to responsible
    authorities, the RQ value is given in this section. Finally, Section 16 is a catchall section where manufacturers
    can put additional information that may be important to their customers or in the markets were the product is
    sold (UNECE, 2017).

    Besides the SDS, the container label is a snapshot of the SDS because it is meant to give a shipper,
    warehouse worker, firefighter, or other person coming into contact with the chemical a visual of the hazards
    by simply glancing at the label. The pictograms indicate the type of hazard that is associated with the product
    giving a warning that the product may be an explosive, a health hazard, or that it is harmful to the
    environment. The supplemental text on the label provides additional details but not at the level given in the
    SDS. The elements on the label are chosen to present the most important hazard information and mitigation
    recommendations to those who come into contact with multiple products and containers throughout the day.

    The United Nations committee that developed the GHS would like to have every product tested for each of
    the hazard categories. They recognized that there are not enough testing facilities and that the cost would
    keep many products and innovations from reaching the market. The committee took the step to conservatively
    classify products based on individual chemical ingredients. For example, if a chemical contains an impurity
    that is a carcinogen, it must be considered in the product classification if it exists in the product at a level of
    0.1% (UNECE, 2017). The entire product is subsequently classified as a carcinogen. Similarly, if a chemical
    contains an acid at a level >3% in the product, the entire product will be classified as a corrosive to skin and

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    eyes (UNECE, 2017). If the manufacturer or importer makes the effort to test the product, the test results will
    often indicate that the product is not a corrosive but an irritant. By being conservative in the assumptions used
    to classify a product, the market decides when testing is necessary to adjust the product classification to meet
    specifications of key customers. However, to remove a carcinogen classification, the testing is very expensive
    and of long durations. In this situation, the carcinogen classification becomes a driver for companies to invest
    in research and development to find a greener, less-toxic chemical that still fulfills the performance
    requirements for the product.

    Conclusion

    In summary, having information about the chemical hazards of a product allows a hazard assessment to be
    done to determine if the product will fit into the manufacturing facility with its current level of engineering
    controls and personal protective equipment used by workers. If the hazards require additional levels of
    protection, additional controls and ventilation can be incorporated into the manufacturing operations. To
    minimize the need for these protections, it is still best to find ways to reformulate and redesign products to
    minimize the use of toxic chemicals and to eliminate hazards from the facility.

    References

    Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2017). OSH answers fact sheets: Transportation of

    dangerous goods (TDG) – classification. Government of Canada.
    https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/legisl/tdg/tdg_classification.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The globally harmonized system for hazard

    communication. United States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    United Nations. (2017). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (7th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev07/English/ST_SG_AC10_30_R
    ev7e.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The GHS was discussed in detail in the unit lesson, and you read the overview as part of the required reading
    for this unit. It is important to be familiar with this document, so take a few minutes to peruse it in its entirety.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Scenario: You are cleaning out your shed and find an unopened bottle of a cleaning product. As you read the
    list of ingredients on the label, you see that the product contains benzene. Using the internet, find a safety
    data sheet (SDS) for benzene (CAS 71-43-2). Read through the hazards in Section 2, and list the hazards
    associated with benzene. Based on your list, what hazard concerns you most? Will you choose to use the
    product or dispose of it as a waste? Find a product in your storage area, and repeat this exercise for the
    ingredients on the label. Note: to find the CAS number, use the internet to search for it. For example, you can
    Google the CAS number for phenol.

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Introduction
    – Chemical Classifications
    – Communication of Hazards
    – Conclusion
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Your company is looking to purchase a small chemical company in Southern California. The company produces commodity organic chemicals that are used as building blocks to synthesize complex molecules for use in the pharmaceutical industry. Identify the air quality management districts in Southern California and the requirements of state implementation plans (SIP) that you find that are in effect for the small company. Make a recommendation to management to go forward with the acquisition or to consider other options in their growth strategy.

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitVIII.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize important environmental safety and health-related laws.
    1.1 Apply information from the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of

    Chemicals (GHS) to a given scenario.

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory services.
    2.1 Analyze a safety data sheet (SDS).
    2.2 Recommend the proper procedures for handling a hazardous substance.
    2.3 Discuss the measures that should be taken when using a hazardous substance in a

    manufacturing operation.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The document below is the GHS that was referenced in the unit lesson. Please read Chapters 1.1 through 1.5
    (the Introduction section). It will give you an overview of this important document and help you complete the
    assignment for this unit.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Chemicals are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because they have the potential to
    adversely impact human health and the environment. The environmental regulations are designed to
    minimize exposure. The purpose of this unit is to present the hazard classification scheme and to show the
    criteria used to measure hazard categories. The hazards are classified, which allows those coming into
    contact with the chemicals to understand their threat and to have the necessary information to determine if
    the chemical can be used safely in the facility.

    Chemical Classifications

    As the markets for chemicals grew and as workers, consumers, and the environment began to experience
    adverse effects from their use, countries around the world began to implement chemical programs to manage
    toxic chemicals and their hazards. Each country set up its own system for classifications, labeling, and the
    definitions they applied to toxic, hazardous, dangerous, safe, etc. What was classified as hazardous in one
    country was toxic in another, and what was considered to be safe in one place was restricted and controlled
    in another. When trade in chemicals and their products experienced an upsurge in world markets, it was
    impossible for regulators, customs, and end users to understand and make sense of the hazards identified on
    product labels. The United Nations recognized that international trade would become restricted unless a
    common and consistent international safety standard was used across the globe to classify chemicals and to

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Chemical Classifications and
    the Communications of Hazards

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    represent their hazards. This classification system became known as the Globally Harmonized System of
    Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and also included requirements for safety data sheets (SDSs)
    and container labels (Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], n.d.).

    The GHS classification system categorizes hazards into the following three categories:

    1. physical/chemical hazards;
    2. human and mammalian toxicity; and
    3. environmental toxicity.

    There are more than 28 categories of hazards that are aligned with nine hazard pictograms (United Nations
    Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE], 2017). The GHS is reviewed by a United Nations committee
    every 2 years at which time new hazard categories and criteria are implemented. While the GHS is intended
    to be a unifying system that harmonizes the identification and communication of hazards, it has not
    accomplished this in its roll out. The GHS is voluntary, and countries that want to participate in international
    trade are choosing to adopt it into their national laws. Countries are not required to adopt all of the GHS
    system as they can pick and choose what elements of GHS they want to incorporate into their national
    regulations.

    For example, Europe, China, and Japan have adopted all elements of the GHS, whereas the United States
    and Canada have not adopted the environmental elements of the GHS. In Europe, it is easy to identify
    products that are harmful to the environment. However, in the United States, environmental hazards are not
    mentioned because only OSHA agreed to adopt the GHS, and the elements affecting worker safety became a
    part of the U.S. standard. The EPA did not agree to adopt the environmental elements of GHS because this
    would conflict with current programs that the EPA had in place. Canada followed the U.S. lead. Health
    Canada adopted the same elements as the U.S. OSHA while Environment Canada followed the lead of the
    U.S. EPA.

    Examples of physical hazard include the categories of explosives, flammable solids and liquids, self-reacting,
    and heating substances and mixtures. Examples of health hazards include acute toxicity; skin and eye
    corrosion/irritation; skin and respiratory sensitizer; and carcinogen, mutagen, and reproductive toxicant.
    Environmental hazards include the categories of acute and chronic aquatic toxicity and hazardous to the
    ozone layer (UNECE, 2017). Each of these categories have defined criteria that are used to classify the
    hazards of a chemical or mixture.

    Communication of Hazards

    The hazards of a product are communicated via the SDS and the container label. The SDS is a 16-section
    document starting with the identity of the chemical and the manufacturer. Section 2 identifies the product
    hazards. It lists the GHS categories and subcategories for each of the applicable 28 hazards. The applicable
    pictogram is provided along with a signal word indicating danger or warning (UNECE, 2017). Hazard
    statements are also provided that list the specific hazard indicated by the pictograms. It takes all three
    elements (pictogram, signal word, and hazard statement) to understand the hazards of each product.
    Following the designation of the hazards, precautionary statements follow that help to define the safe use of
    the product and, if implemented, will help to mitigate the hazards of the product.

    Section 3 of the SDS lists the individual chemical substances and complexes that contribute to the product
    classification (UNECE, 2017). For products that are mixtures of chemicals, it is not uncommon to see multiple
    chemicals listed in Section 3 along with their Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number and their approximate
    percentage in the product.

    Other sections of the SDS cover first aid measures, firefighting measures, accidental release measures, and
    handling and storage precautions. The storage section contains warnings that require the separation of acids
    and bases as well as the separation of oxidizers and reducing agents. For very dangerous chemicals, a
    recommendation is often made to quarantine these and lock them into a limited access area. Section 8 of the
    SDS contains important information for the site industrial hygienist. Chemical substances in the mixture that
    have an OSHA exposure standard are listed with the allowable exposure value. These standards can be time

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    weighted averages, short-term exposure levels, permissible exposure limits, and any state-specific standards
    published for their list of chemicals of concern (UNECE, 2017).

    The industrial hygiene lead can reference these exposure limits to set up monitoring for employees and the
    facility to measure exposure levels against the standards. If any recommended level is exceeded,
    administrative controls, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment can be put into place to
    protect the employee. It is not uncommon to see enhanced ventilation and equipment in enclosures that put a
    barrier between the chemical and the employee. Section 8 also lists supplier recommendations from the
    manufacturer. These include recommendations for face shields, chemical-resistant gloves, long-sleeve
    clothing, and chemical-resistant sleeves that keep clothing dry and clean (UNECE, 2017). No one wants to
    expose their family to chemical hazards when they take contaminated clothing home to be washed.

    Section 9 lists the physical/chemical properties of the substance (UNECE, 2017). Vapor density will indicate if
    it is a chemical that will sink to the floor or rise into the air; imagine crawling along the floor to avoid smoke
    from a fire only to be fully exposed to a toxic chemical that has a density heavier than air. Section 9 will
    indicate if a chemical is water-soluble. In the event of a spill, hoses are often used to wash material into a
    floor drain. A water-soluble chemical that dissolves in the wash water is carried down the floor drain to an
    onsite treatment system ultimately making its way into a river where the chemical can have adverse effects on
    aquatic life for years to come. Section 10 discusses the stability and reactivity of the chemical. It is in this
    section that the rationale for putting chemicals into segregated storage are explained (UNECE, 2017).

    Sections 11 and 12 of the SDS provide toxicity data for individual chemicals (UNECE, 2017). If the
    manufacturer has tested the product and has toxicity data, this is where it is included. However, testing is
    expensive, and for low-volume products, testing cannot be justified. There is website from the European
    Chemicals Agency (ECHA) that contains a wealth of information on the chemicals from European
    manufacturers and importers who have completed mandatory testing protocols to support a chemical
    registration. Section 12 is a similar section that provides environmental data and effects (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 13 covers disposal considerations, but because of a multitude of local laws and requirements, most
    SDS will advise companies seeking to dispose of product as a waste to consult local authorities and comply
    with local regulations (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 14 summarizes transport information for ground, air, and sea (UNECE, 2017). Transport
    classifications are aligned with GHS classifications because this was intentionally done in United Nations
    committees that developed the hazard classifications for GHS. Shippers can reference the information in
    Section 14 to identify packaging, volume limitations, and placarding requirements (Canadian Centre for
    Occupational Health and Safety, 2017).

    Section 15 addresses regulatory requirements that may apply to the chemicals (UNECE, 2017). For example,
    if the chemical has a reportable quantity (RQ) where an immediate notification is to be made to responsible
    authorities, the RQ value is given in this section. Finally, Section 16 is a catchall section where manufacturers
    can put additional information that may be important to their customers or in the markets were the product is
    sold (UNECE, 2017).

    Besides the SDS, the container label is a snapshot of the SDS because it is meant to give a shipper,
    warehouse worker, firefighter, or other person coming into contact with the chemical a visual of the hazards
    by simply glancing at the label. The pictograms indicate the type of hazard that is associated with the product
    giving a warning that the product may be an explosive, a health hazard, or that it is harmful to the
    environment. The supplemental text on the label provides additional details but not at the level given in the
    SDS. The elements on the label are chosen to present the most important hazard information and mitigation
    recommendations to those who come into contact with multiple products and containers throughout the day.

    The United Nations committee that developed the GHS would like to have every product tested for each of
    the hazard categories. They recognized that there are not enough testing facilities and that the cost would
    keep many products and innovations from reaching the market. The committee took the step to conservatively
    classify products based on individual chemical ingredients. For example, if a chemical contains an impurity
    that is a carcinogen, it must be considered in the product classification if it exists in the product at a level of
    0.1% (UNECE, 2017). The entire product is subsequently classified as a carcinogen. Similarly, if a chemical
    contains an acid at a level >3% in the product, the entire product will be classified as a corrosive to skin and

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    eyes (UNECE, 2017). If the manufacturer or importer makes the effort to test the product, the test results will
    often indicate that the product is not a corrosive but an irritant. By being conservative in the assumptions used
    to classify a product, the market decides when testing is necessary to adjust the product classification to meet
    specifications of key customers. However, to remove a carcinogen classification, the testing is very expensive
    and of long durations. In this situation, the carcinogen classification becomes a driver for companies to invest
    in research and development to find a greener, less-toxic chemical that still fulfills the performance
    requirements for the product.

    Conclusion

    In summary, having information about the chemical hazards of a product allows a hazard assessment to be
    done to determine if the product will fit into the manufacturing facility with its current level of engineering
    controls and personal protective equipment used by workers. If the hazards require additional levels of
    protection, additional controls and ventilation can be incorporated into the manufacturing operations. To
    minimize the need for these protections, it is still best to find ways to reformulate and redesign products to
    minimize the use of toxic chemicals and to eliminate hazards from the facility.

    References

    Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2017). OSH answers fact sheets: Transportation of

    dangerous goods (TDG) – classification. Government of Canada.
    https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/legisl/tdg/tdg_classification.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The globally harmonized system for hazard

    communication. United States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    United Nations. (2017). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (7th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev07/English/ST_SG_AC10_30_R
    ev7e.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The GHS was discussed in detail in the unit lesson, and you read the overview as part of the required reading
    for this unit. It is important to be familiar with this document, so take a few minutes to peruse it in its entirety.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Scenario: You are cleaning out your shed and find an unopened bottle of a cleaning product. As you read the
    list of ingredients on the label, you see that the product contains benzene. Using the internet, find a safety
    data sheet (SDS) for benzene (CAS 71-43-2). Read through the hazards in Section 2, and list the hazards
    associated with benzene. Based on your list, what hazard concerns you most? Will you choose to use the
    product or dispose of it as a waste? Find a product in your storage area, and repeat this exercise for the
    ingredients on the label. Note: to find the CAS number, use the internet to search for it. For example, you can
    Google the CAS number for phenol.

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Introduction
    – Chemical Classifications
    – Communication of Hazards
    – Conclusion
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Your company is looking to purchase a small chemical company in Southern California. The company produces commodity organic chemicals that are used as building blocks to synthesize complex molecules for use in the pharmaceutical industry. Identify the air quality management districts in Southern California and the requirements of state implementation plans (SIP) that you find that are in effect for the small company. Make a recommendation to management to go forward with the acquisition or to consider other options in their growth strategy.

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitVIII.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize important environmental safety and health-related laws.
    1.1 Apply information from the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of

    Chemicals (GHS) to a given scenario.

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory services.
    2.1 Analyze a safety data sheet (SDS).
    2.2 Recommend the proper procedures for handling a hazardous substance.
    2.3 Discuss the measures that should be taken when using a hazardous substance in a

    manufacturing operation.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The document below is the GHS that was referenced in the unit lesson. Please read Chapters 1.1 through 1.5
    (the Introduction section). It will give you an overview of this important document and help you complete the
    assignment for this unit.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Chemicals are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because they have the potential to
    adversely impact human health and the environment. The environmental regulations are designed to
    minimize exposure. The purpose of this unit is to present the hazard classification scheme and to show the
    criteria used to measure hazard categories. The hazards are classified, which allows those coming into
    contact with the chemicals to understand their threat and to have the necessary information to determine if
    the chemical can be used safely in the facility.

    Chemical Classifications

    As the markets for chemicals grew and as workers, consumers, and the environment began to experience
    adverse effects from their use, countries around the world began to implement chemical programs to manage
    toxic chemicals and their hazards. Each country set up its own system for classifications, labeling, and the
    definitions they applied to toxic, hazardous, dangerous, safe, etc. What was classified as hazardous in one
    country was toxic in another, and what was considered to be safe in one place was restricted and controlled
    in another. When trade in chemicals and their products experienced an upsurge in world markets, it was
    impossible for regulators, customs, and end users to understand and make sense of the hazards identified on
    product labels. The United Nations recognized that international trade would become restricted unless a
    common and consistent international safety standard was used across the globe to classify chemicals and to

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Chemical Classifications and
    the Communications of Hazards

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    represent their hazards. This classification system became known as the Globally Harmonized System of
    Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and also included requirements for safety data sheets (SDSs)
    and container labels (Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], n.d.).

    The GHS classification system categorizes hazards into the following three categories:

    1. physical/chemical hazards;
    2. human and mammalian toxicity; and
    3. environmental toxicity.

    There are more than 28 categories of hazards that are aligned with nine hazard pictograms (United Nations
    Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE], 2017). The GHS is reviewed by a United Nations committee
    every 2 years at which time new hazard categories and criteria are implemented. While the GHS is intended
    to be a unifying system that harmonizes the identification and communication of hazards, it has not
    accomplished this in its roll out. The GHS is voluntary, and countries that want to participate in international
    trade are choosing to adopt it into their national laws. Countries are not required to adopt all of the GHS
    system as they can pick and choose what elements of GHS they want to incorporate into their national
    regulations.

    For example, Europe, China, and Japan have adopted all elements of the GHS, whereas the United States
    and Canada have not adopted the environmental elements of the GHS. In Europe, it is easy to identify
    products that are harmful to the environment. However, in the United States, environmental hazards are not
    mentioned because only OSHA agreed to adopt the GHS, and the elements affecting worker safety became a
    part of the U.S. standard. The EPA did not agree to adopt the environmental elements of GHS because this
    would conflict with current programs that the EPA had in place. Canada followed the U.S. lead. Health
    Canada adopted the same elements as the U.S. OSHA while Environment Canada followed the lead of the
    U.S. EPA.

    Examples of physical hazard include the categories of explosives, flammable solids and liquids, self-reacting,
    and heating substances and mixtures. Examples of health hazards include acute toxicity; skin and eye
    corrosion/irritation; skin and respiratory sensitizer; and carcinogen, mutagen, and reproductive toxicant.
    Environmental hazards include the categories of acute and chronic aquatic toxicity and hazardous to the
    ozone layer (UNECE, 2017). Each of these categories have defined criteria that are used to classify the
    hazards of a chemical or mixture.

    Communication of Hazards

    The hazards of a product are communicated via the SDS and the container label. The SDS is a 16-section
    document starting with the identity of the chemical and the manufacturer. Section 2 identifies the product
    hazards. It lists the GHS categories and subcategories for each of the applicable 28 hazards. The applicable
    pictogram is provided along with a signal word indicating danger or warning (UNECE, 2017). Hazard
    statements are also provided that list the specific hazard indicated by the pictograms. It takes all three
    elements (pictogram, signal word, and hazard statement) to understand the hazards of each product.
    Following the designation of the hazards, precautionary statements follow that help to define the safe use of
    the product and, if implemented, will help to mitigate the hazards of the product.

    Section 3 of the SDS lists the individual chemical substances and complexes that contribute to the product
    classification (UNECE, 2017). For products that are mixtures of chemicals, it is not uncommon to see multiple
    chemicals listed in Section 3 along with their Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number and their approximate
    percentage in the product.

    Other sections of the SDS cover first aid measures, firefighting measures, accidental release measures, and
    handling and storage precautions. The storage section contains warnings that require the separation of acids
    and bases as well as the separation of oxidizers and reducing agents. For very dangerous chemicals, a
    recommendation is often made to quarantine these and lock them into a limited access area. Section 8 of the
    SDS contains important information for the site industrial hygienist. Chemical substances in the mixture that
    have an OSHA exposure standard are listed with the allowable exposure value. These standards can be time

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    weighted averages, short-term exposure levels, permissible exposure limits, and any state-specific standards
    published for their list of chemicals of concern (UNECE, 2017).

    The industrial hygiene lead can reference these exposure limits to set up monitoring for employees and the
    facility to measure exposure levels against the standards. If any recommended level is exceeded,
    administrative controls, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment can be put into place to
    protect the employee. It is not uncommon to see enhanced ventilation and equipment in enclosures that put a
    barrier between the chemical and the employee. Section 8 also lists supplier recommendations from the
    manufacturer. These include recommendations for face shields, chemical-resistant gloves, long-sleeve
    clothing, and chemical-resistant sleeves that keep clothing dry and clean (UNECE, 2017). No one wants to
    expose their family to chemical hazards when they take contaminated clothing home to be washed.

    Section 9 lists the physical/chemical properties of the substance (UNECE, 2017). Vapor density will indicate if
    it is a chemical that will sink to the floor or rise into the air; imagine crawling along the floor to avoid smoke
    from a fire only to be fully exposed to a toxic chemical that has a density heavier than air. Section 9 will
    indicate if a chemical is water-soluble. In the event of a spill, hoses are often used to wash material into a
    floor drain. A water-soluble chemical that dissolves in the wash water is carried down the floor drain to an
    onsite treatment system ultimately making its way into a river where the chemical can have adverse effects on
    aquatic life for years to come. Section 10 discusses the stability and reactivity of the chemical. It is in this
    section that the rationale for putting chemicals into segregated storage are explained (UNECE, 2017).

    Sections 11 and 12 of the SDS provide toxicity data for individual chemicals (UNECE, 2017). If the
    manufacturer has tested the product and has toxicity data, this is where it is included. However, testing is
    expensive, and for low-volume products, testing cannot be justified. There is website from the European
    Chemicals Agency (ECHA) that contains a wealth of information on the chemicals from European
    manufacturers and importers who have completed mandatory testing protocols to support a chemical
    registration. Section 12 is a similar section that provides environmental data and effects (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 13 covers disposal considerations, but because of a multitude of local laws and requirements, most
    SDS will advise companies seeking to dispose of product as a waste to consult local authorities and comply
    with local regulations (UNECE, 2017).

    Section 14 summarizes transport information for ground, air, and sea (UNECE, 2017). Transport
    classifications are aligned with GHS classifications because this was intentionally done in United Nations
    committees that developed the hazard classifications for GHS. Shippers can reference the information in
    Section 14 to identify packaging, volume limitations, and placarding requirements (Canadian Centre for
    Occupational Health and Safety, 2017).

    Section 15 addresses regulatory requirements that may apply to the chemicals (UNECE, 2017). For example,
    if the chemical has a reportable quantity (RQ) where an immediate notification is to be made to responsible
    authorities, the RQ value is given in this section. Finally, Section 16 is a catchall section where manufacturers
    can put additional information that may be important to their customers or in the markets were the product is
    sold (UNECE, 2017).

    Besides the SDS, the container label is a snapshot of the SDS because it is meant to give a shipper,
    warehouse worker, firefighter, or other person coming into contact with the chemical a visual of the hazards
    by simply glancing at the label. The pictograms indicate the type of hazard that is associated with the product
    giving a warning that the product may be an explosive, a health hazard, or that it is harmful to the
    environment. The supplemental text on the label provides additional details but not at the level given in the
    SDS. The elements on the label are chosen to present the most important hazard information and mitigation
    recommendations to those who come into contact with multiple products and containers throughout the day.

    The United Nations committee that developed the GHS would like to have every product tested for each of
    the hazard categories. They recognized that there are not enough testing facilities and that the cost would
    keep many products and innovations from reaching the market. The committee took the step to conservatively
    classify products based on individual chemical ingredients. For example, if a chemical contains an impurity
    that is a carcinogen, it must be considered in the product classification if it exists in the product at a level of
    0.1% (UNECE, 2017). The entire product is subsequently classified as a carcinogen. Similarly, if a chemical
    contains an acid at a level >3% in the product, the entire product will be classified as a corrosive to skin and

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    [https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals](https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    eyes (UNECE, 2017). If the manufacturer or importer makes the effort to test the product, the test results will
    often indicate that the product is not a corrosive but an irritant. By being conservative in the assumptions used
    to classify a product, the market decides when testing is necessary to adjust the product classification to meet
    specifications of key customers. However, to remove a carcinogen classification, the testing is very expensive
    and of long durations. In this situation, the carcinogen classification becomes a driver for companies to invest
    in research and development to find a greener, less-toxic chemical that still fulfills the performance
    requirements for the product.

    Conclusion

    In summary, having information about the chemical hazards of a product allows a hazard assessment to be
    done to determine if the product will fit into the manufacturing facility with its current level of engineering
    controls and personal protective equipment used by workers. If the hazards require additional levels of
    protection, additional controls and ventilation can be incorporated into the manufacturing operations. To
    minimize the need for these protections, it is still best to find ways to reformulate and redesign products to
    minimize the use of toxic chemicals and to eliminate hazards from the facility.

    References

    Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2017). OSH answers fact sheets: Transportation of

    dangerous goods (TDG) – classification. Government of Canada.
    https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/legisl/tdg/tdg_classification.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The globally harmonized system for hazard

    communication. United States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    United Nations. (2017). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (7th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev07/English/ST_SG_AC10_30_R
    ev7e.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The GHS was discussed in detail in the unit lesson, and you read the overview as part of the required reading
    for this unit. It is important to be familiar with this document, so take a few minutes to peruse it in its entirety.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.).
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Scenario: You are cleaning out your shed and find an unopened bottle of a cleaning product. As you read the
    list of ingredients on the label, you see that the product contains benzene. Using the internet, find a safety
    data sheet (SDS) for benzene (CAS 71-43-2). Read through the hazards in Section 2, and list the hazards
    associated with benzene. Based on your list, what hazard concerns you most? Will you choose to use the
    product or dispose of it as a waste? Find a product in your storage area, and repeat this exercise for the
    ingredients on the label. Note: to find the CAS number, use the internet to search for it. For example, you can
    Google the CAS number for phenol.

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=387589&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Introduction
    – Chemical Classifications
    – Communication of Hazards
    – Conclusion
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

  • [Solved] DB1 OSHA 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached **files (2)** – ## DB1.docx – ## UnitI.pdf **## DB1.docx** DB 1: OSH 2304-19.01.01-6B26-S3, Introduction to Contractor Safety An initial post of at least 200 words addressing the discussion board topic. Use this introduction and job description to answer Part II questions. I am Shorley …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## DB1.docx

    – ## UnitI.pdf

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB 1: OSH 2304-19.01.01-6B26-S3, Introduction to Contractor Safety

    An initial post of at least 200 words addressing the discussion board topic. Use this introduction and job description to answer Part II questions.

    I am Shorley Moten, and I am from Selma, Alabama. I currently reside in Columbus, GA, and serve as a protocol specialist for the Department of Defense. My future goal is to complete my associate's degree. I joined the Army at 22. I spent 21 years in the Army and retired at the age of 43. In the Army, I was a petroleum supply specialist, a term for a fuel handler. I issued, received, and accounted for all items related to gas, fuel, petroleum products, and oil lubricants. Eventually, at the senior level, I managed fuel and water issuance and receipt, as well as the lab testing of the fuel and water, and ensured accountability for all aspects. I was certified in this career field to handle hazardous materials and had the credentials to earn my CDL commercial license upon my exit from the military.

    Part II: What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize hazards associated with what you do? Do you know how to control them? Explain your answers.

    Reply 1:
    **Leina Saavedra** Top of Form

    Hello everyone,

    My name is Leina Saavedra and I am currently six years in the U.S Navy as a Machinist Mate, I am stationed in Norfolk, Virginia. I am not attached to a boat currently but when I was, I used to work below deck in the engine room making sure there is fire in the boiler or if the evap is sufficiently making water to use for distilled or potable water. For my future goals, I want to graduate with my OSHA/ Construction Safety degree to use when I feel like it is the right time for me to get out the Navy. I am still undecided but at least I will have a degree to give me the extra push I might need.

    Since I am not currently with a boat, I am working in Port Operations and stand watch in the tower. Those who stand watch there oversee all seaside operations including any vessels coming in out of the harbor, civilian tug jobs or divers operations. The only hazards at the moment I should be vigilant of is when the divers are in the water and to make sure there are no boats, fuel transfers/ refill in their vicinity. To make sure the divers are clear of danger we double check the schedule to see if there is no jobs of the sort and if there is we need to promptly inform them that there is before they start work or in some cases we will call their supervisor and have them pulled from the water.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitI.pdf**

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Discuss hazards unique to contract work.
    1.1 Summarize and classify the most common types of workplace accidents.
    1.2 Indicate the industries most affected by accidents.
    1.3 Explain the three steps of Hazard Communication classification.

    5. Discuss contractor safety from a safety management systems perspective.

    5.1 Describe an event that contributed to the safety movement.
    5.2 Explain the costs of workplace accidents.
    5.3 Identify the factors that are included in estimating the true cost of accidents for an employer.

    Required Unit Resources

    Introduction: Safety Movement and the Construction Industry

    Chapter 1: Cost of Accidents: Why Safety is Important?

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, November 9). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2021

    (News Release No. USDL-22-2139). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    History

    Over many, many years, it has become recognized that worker safety benefits business. Without workers, a
    business cannot survive. In this first unit, we learn a little about the history of the safety movement and how
    the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) came to exist.

    Tragedy is often the precursor to change. Unfortunately, tragedy affects lives, and in the workplace, the
    avoidance of tragedies has not always been at the forefront of decision-making. In the unit reading
    assignment, we look at one of the most horrific workplace tragedies in the United States. In the early part of
    the 20th Century in New York City, 146 workers lost their lives in what is known today as the Triangle
    Shirtwaist Factory Fire. This tragic event and others were integral to many advances in workplace safety.

    Also, up until the early part of the 20th century, as the textbook states, there was “little concern for the safety
    of workers and little incentive to be concerned” (Goetsch, 2018, p. 6). Workers were plentiful, including
    children, and the industrial revolution was booming. In the early part of the 20th century, workers became
    more valuable as industry continued to expand and war efforts needed workers. Losing a worker to the war
    efforts impacted businesses already; losing one to an injury was not acceptable as not only safety but quality
    suffered as well (Goetsch, 2018). As a result, safety programs began to be more common.

    In 1913, William B. Wilson was appointed as the first Secretary of Labor. His purpose was to guide the
    Department of Labor in improving working conditions for all Americans. Part of the duties of the Department of
    Labor was to ensure reporting of industrial diseases and accidents. Wilson had spent most of his career

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE

    History of the Safety Movement
    and the Cost of Accidents

    [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    working in the coal mines and had been an official with the United Mine Workers. His experiences led him to
    write a poem, quoted here, in 1903:

    Stalwart men were but as feathers
    Driven with a cyclone's fire.
    Fast their flesh and sinews shriveled,
    Scorched and roasted with the fire. (MacLaury, 1981, para. 14)

    What had started as the Bureau of Labor transformed into the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and, in
    the early days, focused on collecting data for accidents in the iron and steel industries. This was eventually
    updated to include other industries as well. Under Wilson’s guidance, and in keeping with his 1903 poem, the
    goal was to improve working conditions and to "Make the unhealthy occupations healthy” (MacLaury,
    1981, para. 15).

    That being said, and noting also that the safety movement has been in place for well over 100 years, we have
    some work to do! The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire kicked off the safety movement in a big way. But that is
    not the end of it—these incidents continue to happen:

    1978: Willow Island, West Virginia – 51 workers died in a collapse of a cooling tower that was being
    constructed
    1989: Pasadena, Texas, explosion at a refinery—23 workers never made it home, over 300 suffered
    injuries
    1991: Hamlet Chicken Processing Plant fire—25 worker deaths
    1988: Piper Alpha oil rig explosion—167 worker deaths
    1947: Texas City cargo ship explosion—estimation of between 500 and 600 worker and community
    deaths
    2008: Manhattan – 6 workers died as a result of a crane collapse
    2010: Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion—11 deaths
    2010: Upper Big Branch Mine coal dust explosion—29 deaths
    2010: Top Notch Cleaners, Alabama chemical asphyxiation—2 deaths
    2016: Miami, Florida – Pedestrian Bridge Collapse – killing 6
    2019: New Orleans – Hard Rock Hotel collapse during construction – 3 dead

    These are just the incidents that make the news. How many do not make the news but are just as serious?
    This is why we do what we do.

    Types of Accidents

    There are hazards we face in everyday life. In the workplace, these hazards become amplified as we are
    performing tasks that we are assigned, and we may have no input in or control over the design of the tasks.
    Some industries are more hazardous than others by their nature; however, there are hazards in every
    occupation. In looking at the types of occupations that are highly hazardous, we use industry classifications to
    determine which have more risks. These classifications can be found in the North American Industry
    Classification System (NAICS) and are tracked by the BLS. The data collected by these entities can be used
    to analyze trends and develop preventive measures within companies. When we look at the types of
    accidents, we can classify them into several groups. Nobody wants to go to work to die. Yet, in 2017, 5147
    workers lost their lives at work (BLS, 2019). And nobody wants to get injured or ill at work. An example of the
    type of data the BLS collects can be seen below. Looking beyond 2017, we see that there were 5,190 fatal
    work injuries recorded in the United States in 2021, an 8.9-percent increase from 4,764in 2020, the U.S.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (See chart 1 and table 1.) The fatal work injury rate as 3.6 fatalities
    per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers, up from 3.4 per 100,000 FTE in 2020, and up from the 2019
    pre-pandemic rate of 3.5. (See chart 2.) These data sets are from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
    (CFOI).

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    When you look at “Safety by the Numbers,” as illustrated above, you can see that there is a downward trend
    in injuries for all industries over the last several years. However, according to the BLS (2018), we have hit a
    plateau. In 2018 alone, private industry employers reported 2.8 million nonfatal workplace injuries and
    illnesses. Unfortunately, these numbers did not decrease from the statistics gathered in 2017 and continued
    steady through 2019, according to the BLS. There was a slight decrease in 2021 from 2020; however, into
    2022 the incident rates continue to rise.

    The statistics might not mean much on a broad basis. However, all of us probably know or know of someone
    who has suffered an injury or illness as a result of their work. We hear of the big accidents, crane collapses,
    trench collapses, fires, and explosions, but what about those we do not hear about: the everyday injuries
    occurring at work that cause us to lose workdays, seek medical treatment, and cause pain. Think about what
    you do every day at work. What are the hazards that can cause you harm: repetitive motions, improper lifting,
    exposure to chemicals? Sometimes, it really is the little things.

    As stated before, some industries are more hazardous than others, just by the very nature of the work.
    However, there are hazards everywhere.

    Example of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
    (Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    How do we prevent these?

    Think about this.

    What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize the hazards? Do you
    know how to control them?

    If you do a quick web search for "fast food restaurant chemical accidents," you will see a few of the tragic
    incidents that can happen when workers were just doing their jobs or cleaning up. The exposures from the
    chemicals used created a toxic atmosphere: a mixture of two chemicals that by themselves are very useful
    but when combined, cause deadly results.

    Under the OSHA standards, workers have specific rights and safeguards. One of those is under the “General
    Duty Clause,” which states, under the OSH Act of 1970 (2004):

    (a) Each employer —

    (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free
    from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
    his employees;

    (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

    (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations,
    and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.

    One other very important standard is the Hazard Communication Standard (2012), 1910.1200. Under this
    “HazCom” standard, the workers have the right to know and shall be trained on the substances they are
    working with.

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    The Cost of Accidents

    Accidents are not cheap—there is a cost attached to everything. And
    sometimes, those costs are not evident at first. For every class of
    accident, there will be a cost assigned—whether it is the cost of a
    Band-Aid or a trip to the clinic, property damage, auto accident, or
    other type of incident. Somebody is going to pay in some way for
    these accidents. An employer might carry insurance for these
    events; however, there are other costs associated with each
    accident. Whether out-of-pocket or through insurance premiums,
    deductibles, lost workdays and production, loss of use of equipment,
    or other losses—these all have costs attached to them. In order to
    move to prevent accidents, we have to consider all the costs
    attached to them.

    Sometimes, the simplest mistakes can be very costly. Consider
    example, for instance: on a construction project, the full use of PPE
    is required, including gloves. One of the younger workers did not like
    wearing gloves, so he cut the fingers out. Well, he picked up some
    metal ductwork, and gave himself a nasty gash across his fingers.
    Does this sound like a first aid treatment type of incident, not for this
    worker. He had to have surgery to repair the tendons on three of his
    fingers. They put him in a full arm cast with a metal halo to hold the
    pins in his fingers in place. He had to wear the brace for 8 weeks, followed by 6 more weeks of physical
    therapy. The medical costs were covered under insurance, of course. However, for the first 8 weeks, he could
    not perform his duties so somebody else had to do his work. Basically, paying for two people to do the job of
    one person. And, that person had to first be hired, and then trained. There was more overhead in hiring costs,
    benefits, and everything else that goes along with these types of losses. For the weeks of therapy, he could
    also only perform light duty, so the replacement worker was now the full-time worker.

    The cut resistant gloves he was supposed to be wearing (with the fingers intact) were priced around $14.00.

    References

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2017

    (News Release No. USDL-18-1788). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11082018.pdf

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019, December 17). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2018 (News

    Release No. USDL-19-2194). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Construction safety and the OSHA standards (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    MacLaury, J. (1981). The job safety law of 1970: Its passage was perilous. U.S. Department of Labor.

    https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/osha

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Hazard communication standard (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200). United
    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200

    OSH Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (2004).

    Torre, E. (n.d.). ID 23503494 [Illustration]. Dreamstime. https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-images-iceberg-

    image23503494

    (Adapted from Torre, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    To learn more about historical workplace incidents and how industries are classified, please visit these sites:

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Industry injury and illness data. United States Department of Labor.

    https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Injuries, ilnesses and fatalities: Incidence rates of nonfatal

    occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2017. United States Department of
    Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, June 11). Achievements in public health, 1900-1999:

    Improvements in workplace safety — United States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
    Report, 48(22), 461–469. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The triangle shirtwaist factory fire. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html

    North American Industry Classification System. (2019, November 13). Introduction to NAICS. United States

    Census Bureau.
    https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to
    %20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm)

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html](https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html)

    [https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.](https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – History
    – Types of Accidents
    – The Cost of Accidents
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## UnitI.pdf**

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Discuss hazards unique to contract work.
    1.1 Summarize and classify the most common types of workplace accidents.
    1.2 Indicate the industries most affected by accidents.
    1.3 Explain the three steps of Hazard Communication classification.

    5. Discuss contractor safety from a safety management systems perspective.

    5.1 Describe an event that contributed to the safety movement.
    5.2 Explain the costs of workplace accidents.
    5.3 Identify the factors that are included in estimating the true cost of accidents for an employer.

    Required Unit Resources

    Introduction: Safety Movement and the Construction Industry

    Chapter 1: Cost of Accidents: Why Safety is Important?

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, November 9). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2021

    (News Release No. USDL-22-2139). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    History

    Over many, many years, it has become recognized that worker safety benefits business. Without workers, a
    business cannot survive. In this first unit, we learn a little about the history of the safety movement and how
    the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) came to exist.

    Tragedy is often the precursor to change. Unfortunately, tragedy affects lives, and in the workplace, the
    avoidance of tragedies has not always been at the forefront of decision-making. In the unit reading
    assignment, we look at one of the most horrific workplace tragedies in the United States. In the early part of
    the 20th Century in New York City, 146 workers lost their lives in what is known today as the Triangle
    Shirtwaist Factory Fire. This tragic event and others were integral to many advances in workplace safety.

    Also, up until the early part of the 20th century, as the textbook states, there was “little concern for the safety
    of workers and little incentive to be concerned” (Goetsch, 2018, p. 6). Workers were plentiful, including
    children, and the industrial revolution was booming. In the early part of the 20th century, workers became
    more valuable as industry continued to expand and war efforts needed workers. Losing a worker to the war
    efforts impacted businesses already; losing one to an injury was not acceptable as not only safety but quality
    suffered as well (Goetsch, 2018). As a result, safety programs began to be more common.

    In 1913, William B. Wilson was appointed as the first Secretary of Labor. His purpose was to guide the
    Department of Labor in improving working conditions for all Americans. Part of the duties of the Department of
    Labor was to ensure reporting of industrial diseases and accidents. Wilson had spent most of his career

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE

    History of the Safety Movement
    and the Cost of Accidents

    [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    working in the coal mines and had been an official with the United Mine Workers. His experiences led him to
    write a poem, quoted here, in 1903:

    Stalwart men were but as feathers
    Driven with a cyclone's fire.
    Fast their flesh and sinews shriveled,
    Scorched and roasted with the fire. (MacLaury, 1981, para. 14)

    What had started as the Bureau of Labor transformed into the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and, in
    the early days, focused on collecting data for accidents in the iron and steel industries. This was eventually
    updated to include other industries as well. Under Wilson’s guidance, and in keeping with his 1903 poem, the
    goal was to improve working conditions and to "Make the unhealthy occupations healthy” (MacLaury,
    1981, para. 15).

    That being said, and noting also that the safety movement has been in place for well over 100 years, we have
    some work to do! The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire kicked off the safety movement in a big way. But that is
    not the end of it—these incidents continue to happen:

    1978: Willow Island, West Virginia – 51 workers died in a collapse of a cooling tower that was being
    constructed
    1989: Pasadena, Texas, explosion at a refinery—23 workers never made it home, over 300 suffered
    injuries
    1991: Hamlet Chicken Processing Plant fire—25 worker deaths
    1988: Piper Alpha oil rig explosion—167 worker deaths
    1947: Texas City cargo ship explosion—estimation of between 500 and 600 worker and community
    deaths
    2008: Manhattan – 6 workers died as a result of a crane collapse
    2010: Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion—11 deaths
    2010: Upper Big Branch Mine coal dust explosion—29 deaths
    2010: Top Notch Cleaners, Alabama chemical asphyxiation—2 deaths
    2016: Miami, Florida – Pedestrian Bridge Collapse – killing 6
    2019: New Orleans – Hard Rock Hotel collapse during construction – 3 dead

    These are just the incidents that make the news. How many do not make the news but are just as serious?
    This is why we do what we do.

    Types of Accidents

    There are hazards we face in everyday life. In the workplace, these hazards become amplified as we are
    performing tasks that we are assigned, and we may have no input in or control over the design of the tasks.
    Some industries are more hazardous than others by their nature; however, there are hazards in every
    occupation. In looking at the types of occupations that are highly hazardous, we use industry classifications to
    determine which have more risks. These classifications can be found in the North American Industry
    Classification System (NAICS) and are tracked by the BLS. The data collected by these entities can be used
    to analyze trends and develop preventive measures within companies. When we look at the types of
    accidents, we can classify them into several groups. Nobody wants to go to work to die. Yet, in 2017, 5147
    workers lost their lives at work (BLS, 2019). And nobody wants to get injured or ill at work. An example of the
    type of data the BLS collects can be seen below. Looking beyond 2017, we see that there were 5,190 fatal
    work injuries recorded in the United States in 2021, an 8.9-percent increase from 4,764in 2020, the U.S.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (See chart 1 and table 1.) The fatal work injury rate as 3.6 fatalities
    per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers, up from 3.4 per 100,000 FTE in 2020, and up from the 2019
    pre-pandemic rate of 3.5. (See chart 2.) These data sets are from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
    (CFOI).

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    When you look at “Safety by the Numbers,” as illustrated above, you can see that there is a downward trend
    in injuries for all industries over the last several years. However, according to the BLS (2018), we have hit a
    plateau. In 2018 alone, private industry employers reported 2.8 million nonfatal workplace injuries and
    illnesses. Unfortunately, these numbers did not decrease from the statistics gathered in 2017 and continued
    steady through 2019, according to the BLS. There was a slight decrease in 2021 from 2020; however, into
    2022 the incident rates continue to rise.

    The statistics might not mean much on a broad basis. However, all of us probably know or know of someone
    who has suffered an injury or illness as a result of their work. We hear of the big accidents, crane collapses,
    trench collapses, fires, and explosions, but what about those we do not hear about: the everyday injuries
    occurring at work that cause us to lose workdays, seek medical treatment, and cause pain. Think about what
    you do every day at work. What are the hazards that can cause you harm: repetitive motions, improper lifting,
    exposure to chemicals? Sometimes, it really is the little things.

    As stated before, some industries are more hazardous than others, just by the very nature of the work.
    However, there are hazards everywhere.

    Example of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
    (Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    How do we prevent these?

    Think about this.

    What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize the hazards? Do you
    know how to control them?

    If you do a quick web search for "fast food restaurant chemical accidents," you will see a few of the tragic
    incidents that can happen when workers were just doing their jobs or cleaning up. The exposures from the
    chemicals used created a toxic atmosphere: a mixture of two chemicals that by themselves are very useful
    but when combined, cause deadly results.

    Under the OSHA standards, workers have specific rights and safeguards. One of those is under the “General
    Duty Clause,” which states, under the OSH Act of 1970 (2004):

    (a) Each employer —

    (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free
    from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
    his employees;

    (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

    (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations,
    and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.

    One other very important standard is the Hazard Communication Standard (2012), 1910.1200. Under this
    “HazCom” standard, the workers have the right to know and shall be trained on the substances they are
    working with.

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    The Cost of Accidents

    Accidents are not cheap—there is a cost attached to everything. And
    sometimes, those costs are not evident at first. For every class of
    accident, there will be a cost assigned—whether it is the cost of a
    Band-Aid or a trip to the clinic, property damage, auto accident, or
    other type of incident. Somebody is going to pay in some way for
    these accidents. An employer might carry insurance for these
    events; however, there are other costs associated with each
    accident. Whether out-of-pocket or through insurance premiums,
    deductibles, lost workdays and production, loss of use of equipment,
    or other losses—these all have costs attached to them. In order to
    move to prevent accidents, we have to consider all the costs
    attached to them.

    Sometimes, the simplest mistakes can be very costly. Consider
    example, for instance: on a construction project, the full use of PPE
    is required, including gloves. One of the younger workers did not like
    wearing gloves, so he cut the fingers out. Well, he picked up some
    metal ductwork, and gave himself a nasty gash across his fingers.
    Does this sound like a first aid treatment type of incident, not for this
    worker. He had to have surgery to repair the tendons on three of his
    fingers. They put him in a full arm cast with a metal halo to hold the
    pins in his fingers in place. He had to wear the brace for 8 weeks, followed by 6 more weeks of physical
    therapy. The medical costs were covered under insurance, of course. However, for the first 8 weeks, he could
    not perform his duties so somebody else had to do his work. Basically, paying for two people to do the job of
    one person. And, that person had to first be hired, and then trained. There was more overhead in hiring costs,
    benefits, and everything else that goes along with these types of losses. For the weeks of therapy, he could
    also only perform light duty, so the replacement worker was now the full-time worker.

    The cut resistant gloves he was supposed to be wearing (with the fingers intact) were priced around $14.00.

    References

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2017

    (News Release No. USDL-18-1788). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11082018.pdf

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019, December 17). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2018 (News

    Release No. USDL-19-2194). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Construction safety and the OSHA standards (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    MacLaury, J. (1981). The job safety law of 1970: Its passage was perilous. U.S. Department of Labor.

    https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/osha

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Hazard communication standard (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200). United
    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200

    OSH Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (2004).

    Torre, E. (n.d.). ID 23503494 [Illustration]. Dreamstime. https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-images-iceberg-

    image23503494

    (Adapted from Torre, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    To learn more about historical workplace incidents and how industries are classified, please visit these sites:

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Industry injury and illness data. United States Department of Labor.

    https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Injuries, ilnesses and fatalities: Incidence rates of nonfatal

    occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2017. United States Department of
    Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, June 11). Achievements in public health, 1900-1999:

    Improvements in workplace safety — United States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
    Report, 48(22), 461–469. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The triangle shirtwaist factory fire. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html

    North American Industry Classification System. (2019, November 13). Introduction to NAICS. United States

    Census Bureau.
    https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to
    %20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm)

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html](https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html)

    [https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.](https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – History
    – Types of Accidents
    – The Cost of Accidents
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB 1: OSH 2304-19.01.01-6B26-S3, Introduction to Contractor Safety

    An initial post of at least 200 words addressing the discussion board topic. Use this introduction and job description to answer Part II questions.

    I am Shorley Moten, and I am from Selma, Alabama. I currently reside in Columbus, GA, and serve as a protocol specialist for the Department of Defense. My future goal is to complete my associate's degree. I joined the Army at 22. I spent 21 years in the Army and retired at the age of 43. In the Army, I was a petroleum supply specialist, a term for a fuel handler. I issued, received, and accounted for all items related to gas, fuel, petroleum products, and oil lubricants. Eventually, at the senior level, I managed fuel and water issuance and receipt, as well as the lab testing of the fuel and water, and ensured accountability for all aspects. I was certified in this career field to handle hazardous materials and had the credentials to earn my CDL commercial license upon my exit from the military.

    Part II: What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize hazards associated with what you do? Do you know how to control them? Explain your answers.

    Reply 1:
    **Leina Saavedra** Top of Form

    Hello everyone,

    My name is Leina Saavedra and I am currently six years in the U.S Navy as a Machinist Mate, I am stationed in Norfolk, Virginia. I am not attached to a boat currently but when I was, I used to work below deck in the engine room making sure there is fire in the boiler or if the evap is sufficiently making water to use for distilled or potable water. For my future goals, I want to graduate with my OSHA/ Construction Safety degree to use when I feel like it is the right time for me to get out the Navy. I am still undecided but at least I will have a degree to give me the extra push I might need.

    Since I am not currently with a boat, I am working in Port Operations and stand watch in the tower. Those who stand watch there oversee all seaside operations including any vessels coming in out of the harbor, civilian tug jobs or divers operations. The only hazards at the moment I should be vigilant of is when the divers are in the water and to make sure there are no boats, fuel transfers/ refill in their vicinity. To make sure the divers are clear of danger we double check the schedule to see if there is no jobs of the sort and if there is we need to promptly inform them that there is before they start work or in some cases we will call their supervisor and have them pulled from the water.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitI.pdf**

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Discuss hazards unique to contract work.
    1.1 Summarize and classify the most common types of workplace accidents.
    1.2 Indicate the industries most affected by accidents.
    1.3 Explain the three steps of Hazard Communication classification.

    5. Discuss contractor safety from a safety management systems perspective.

    5.1 Describe an event that contributed to the safety movement.
    5.2 Explain the costs of workplace accidents.
    5.3 Identify the factors that are included in estimating the true cost of accidents for an employer.

    Required Unit Resources

    Introduction: Safety Movement and the Construction Industry

    Chapter 1: Cost of Accidents: Why Safety is Important?

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, November 9). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2021

    (News Release No. USDL-22-2139). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    History

    Over many, many years, it has become recognized that worker safety benefits business. Without workers, a
    business cannot survive. In this first unit, we learn a little about the history of the safety movement and how
    the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) came to exist.

    Tragedy is often the precursor to change. Unfortunately, tragedy affects lives, and in the workplace, the
    avoidance of tragedies has not always been at the forefront of decision-making. In the unit reading
    assignment, we look at one of the most horrific workplace tragedies in the United States. In the early part of
    the 20th Century in New York City, 146 workers lost their lives in what is known today as the Triangle
    Shirtwaist Factory Fire. This tragic event and others were integral to many advances in workplace safety.

    Also, up until the early part of the 20th century, as the textbook states, there was “little concern for the safety
    of workers and little incentive to be concerned” (Goetsch, 2018, p. 6). Workers were plentiful, including
    children, and the industrial revolution was booming. In the early part of the 20th century, workers became
    more valuable as industry continued to expand and war efforts needed workers. Losing a worker to the war
    efforts impacted businesses already; losing one to an injury was not acceptable as not only safety but quality
    suffered as well (Goetsch, 2018). As a result, safety programs began to be more common.

    In 1913, William B. Wilson was appointed as the first Secretary of Labor. His purpose was to guide the
    Department of Labor in improving working conditions for all Americans. Part of the duties of the Department of
    Labor was to ensure reporting of industrial diseases and accidents. Wilson had spent most of his career

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE

    History of the Safety Movement
    and the Cost of Accidents

    [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    working in the coal mines and had been an official with the United Mine Workers. His experiences led him to
    write a poem, quoted here, in 1903:

    Stalwart men were but as feathers
    Driven with a cyclone's fire.
    Fast their flesh and sinews shriveled,
    Scorched and roasted with the fire. (MacLaury, 1981, para. 14)

    What had started as the Bureau of Labor transformed into the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and, in
    the early days, focused on collecting data for accidents in the iron and steel industries. This was eventually
    updated to include other industries as well. Under Wilson’s guidance, and in keeping with his 1903 poem, the
    goal was to improve working conditions and to "Make the unhealthy occupations healthy” (MacLaury,
    1981, para. 15).

    That being said, and noting also that the safety movement has been in place for well over 100 years, we have
    some work to do! The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire kicked off the safety movement in a big way. But that is
    not the end of it—these incidents continue to happen:

    1978: Willow Island, West Virginia – 51 workers died in a collapse of a cooling tower that was being
    constructed
    1989: Pasadena, Texas, explosion at a refinery—23 workers never made it home, over 300 suffered
    injuries
    1991: Hamlet Chicken Processing Plant fire—25 worker deaths
    1988: Piper Alpha oil rig explosion—167 worker deaths
    1947: Texas City cargo ship explosion—estimation of between 500 and 600 worker and community
    deaths
    2008: Manhattan – 6 workers died as a result of a crane collapse
    2010: Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion—11 deaths
    2010: Upper Big Branch Mine coal dust explosion—29 deaths
    2010: Top Notch Cleaners, Alabama chemical asphyxiation—2 deaths
    2016: Miami, Florida – Pedestrian Bridge Collapse – killing 6
    2019: New Orleans – Hard Rock Hotel collapse during construction – 3 dead

    These are just the incidents that make the news. How many do not make the news but are just as serious?
    This is why we do what we do.

    Types of Accidents

    There are hazards we face in everyday life. In the workplace, these hazards become amplified as we are
    performing tasks that we are assigned, and we may have no input in or control over the design of the tasks.
    Some industries are more hazardous than others by their nature; however, there are hazards in every
    occupation. In looking at the types of occupations that are highly hazardous, we use industry classifications to
    determine which have more risks. These classifications can be found in the North American Industry
    Classification System (NAICS) and are tracked by the BLS. The data collected by these entities can be used
    to analyze trends and develop preventive measures within companies. When we look at the types of
    accidents, we can classify them into several groups. Nobody wants to go to work to die. Yet, in 2017, 5147
    workers lost their lives at work (BLS, 2019). And nobody wants to get injured or ill at work. An example of the
    type of data the BLS collects can be seen below. Looking beyond 2017, we see that there were 5,190 fatal
    work injuries recorded in the United States in 2021, an 8.9-percent increase from 4,764in 2020, the U.S.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (See chart 1 and table 1.) The fatal work injury rate as 3.6 fatalities
    per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers, up from 3.4 per 100,000 FTE in 2020, and up from the 2019
    pre-pandemic rate of 3.5. (See chart 2.) These data sets are from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
    (CFOI).

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    When you look at “Safety by the Numbers,” as illustrated above, you can see that there is a downward trend
    in injuries for all industries over the last several years. However, according to the BLS (2018), we have hit a
    plateau. In 2018 alone, private industry employers reported 2.8 million nonfatal workplace injuries and
    illnesses. Unfortunately, these numbers did not decrease from the statistics gathered in 2017 and continued
    steady through 2019, according to the BLS. There was a slight decrease in 2021 from 2020; however, into
    2022 the incident rates continue to rise.

    The statistics might not mean much on a broad basis. However, all of us probably know or know of someone
    who has suffered an injury or illness as a result of their work. We hear of the big accidents, crane collapses,
    trench collapses, fires, and explosions, but what about those we do not hear about: the everyday injuries
    occurring at work that cause us to lose workdays, seek medical treatment, and cause pain. Think about what
    you do every day at work. What are the hazards that can cause you harm: repetitive motions, improper lifting,
    exposure to chemicals? Sometimes, it really is the little things.

    As stated before, some industries are more hazardous than others, just by the very nature of the work.
    However, there are hazards everywhere.

    Example of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
    (Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    How do we prevent these?

    Think about this.

    What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize the hazards? Do you
    know how to control them?

    If you do a quick web search for "fast food restaurant chemical accidents," you will see a few of the tragic
    incidents that can happen when workers were just doing their jobs or cleaning up. The exposures from the
    chemicals used created a toxic atmosphere: a mixture of two chemicals that by themselves are very useful
    but when combined, cause deadly results.

    Under the OSHA standards, workers have specific rights and safeguards. One of those is under the “General
    Duty Clause,” which states, under the OSH Act of 1970 (2004):

    (a) Each employer —

    (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free
    from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
    his employees;

    (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

    (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations,
    and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.

    One other very important standard is the Hazard Communication Standard (2012), 1910.1200. Under this
    “HazCom” standard, the workers have the right to know and shall be trained on the substances they are
    working with.

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    The Cost of Accidents

    Accidents are not cheap—there is a cost attached to everything. And
    sometimes, those costs are not evident at first. For every class of
    accident, there will be a cost assigned—whether it is the cost of a
    Band-Aid or a trip to the clinic, property damage, auto accident, or
    other type of incident. Somebody is going to pay in some way for
    these accidents. An employer might carry insurance for these
    events; however, there are other costs associated with each
    accident. Whether out-of-pocket or through insurance premiums,
    deductibles, lost workdays and production, loss of use of equipment,
    or other losses—these all have costs attached to them. In order to
    move to prevent accidents, we have to consider all the costs
    attached to them.

    Sometimes, the simplest mistakes can be very costly. Consider
    example, for instance: on a construction project, the full use of PPE
    is required, including gloves. One of the younger workers did not like
    wearing gloves, so he cut the fingers out. Well, he picked up some
    metal ductwork, and gave himself a nasty gash across his fingers.
    Does this sound like a first aid treatment type of incident, not for this
    worker. He had to have surgery to repair the tendons on three of his
    fingers. They put him in a full arm cast with a metal halo to hold the
    pins in his fingers in place. He had to wear the brace for 8 weeks, followed by 6 more weeks of physical
    therapy. The medical costs were covered under insurance, of course. However, for the first 8 weeks, he could
    not perform his duties so somebody else had to do his work. Basically, paying for two people to do the job of
    one person. And, that person had to first be hired, and then trained. There was more overhead in hiring costs,
    benefits, and everything else that goes along with these types of losses. For the weeks of therapy, he could
    also only perform light duty, so the replacement worker was now the full-time worker.

    The cut resistant gloves he was supposed to be wearing (with the fingers intact) were priced around $14.00.

    References

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2017

    (News Release No. USDL-18-1788). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11082018.pdf

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019, December 17). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2018 (News

    Release No. USDL-19-2194). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Construction safety and the OSHA standards (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    MacLaury, J. (1981). The job safety law of 1970: Its passage was perilous. U.S. Department of Labor.

    https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/osha

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Hazard communication standard (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200). United
    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200

    OSH Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (2004).

    Torre, E. (n.d.). ID 23503494 [Illustration]. Dreamstime. https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-images-iceberg-

    image23503494

    (Adapted from Torre, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    To learn more about historical workplace incidents and how industries are classified, please visit these sites:

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Industry injury and illness data. United States Department of Labor.

    https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Injuries, ilnesses and fatalities: Incidence rates of nonfatal

    occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2017. United States Department of
    Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, June 11). Achievements in public health, 1900-1999:

    Improvements in workplace safety — United States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
    Report, 48(22), 461–469. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The triangle shirtwaist factory fire. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html

    North American Industry Classification System. (2019, November 13). Introduction to NAICS. United States

    Census Bureau.
    https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to
    %20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm)

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html](https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html)

    [https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.](https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – History
    – Types of Accidents
    – The Cost of Accidents
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB 1: OSH 2304-19.01.01-6B26-S3, Introduction to Contractor Safety

    An initial post of at least 200 words addressing the discussion board topic. Use this introduction and job description to answer Part II questions.

    I am Shorley Moten, and I am from Selma, Alabama. I currently reside in Columbus, GA, and serve as a protocol specialist for the Department of Defense. My future goal is to complete my associate's degree. I joined the Army at 22. I spent 21 years in the Army and retired at the age of 43. In the Army, I was a petroleum supply specialist, a term for a fuel handler. I issued, received, and accounted for all items related to gas, fuel, petroleum products, and oil lubricants. Eventually, at the senior level, I managed fuel and water issuance and receipt, as well as the lab testing of the fuel and water, and ensured accountability for all aspects. I was certified in this career field to handle hazardous materials and had the credentials to earn my CDL commercial license upon my exit from the military.

    Part II: What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize hazards associated with what you do? Do you know how to control them? Explain your answers.

    Reply 1:
    **Leina Saavedra** Top of Form

    Hello everyone,

    My name is Leina Saavedra and I am currently six years in the U.S Navy as a Machinist Mate, I am stationed in Norfolk, Virginia. I am not attached to a boat currently but when I was, I used to work below deck in the engine room making sure there is fire in the boiler or if the evap is sufficiently making water to use for distilled or potable water. For my future goals, I want to graduate with my OSHA/ Construction Safety degree to use when I feel like it is the right time for me to get out the Navy. I am still undecided but at least I will have a degree to give me the extra push I might need.

    Since I am not currently with a boat, I am working in Port Operations and stand watch in the tower. Those who stand watch there oversee all seaside operations including any vessels coming in out of the harbor, civilian tug jobs or divers operations. The only hazards at the moment I should be vigilant of is when the divers are in the water and to make sure there are no boats, fuel transfers/ refill in their vicinity. To make sure the divers are clear of danger we double check the schedule to see if there is no jobs of the sort and if there is we need to promptly inform them that there is before they start work or in some cases we will call their supervisor and have them pulled from the water.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitI.pdf**

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Discuss hazards unique to contract work.
    1.1 Summarize and classify the most common types of workplace accidents.
    1.2 Indicate the industries most affected by accidents.
    1.3 Explain the three steps of Hazard Communication classification.

    5. Discuss contractor safety from a safety management systems perspective.

    5.1 Describe an event that contributed to the safety movement.
    5.2 Explain the costs of workplace accidents.
    5.3 Identify the factors that are included in estimating the true cost of accidents for an employer.

    Required Unit Resources

    Introduction: Safety Movement and the Construction Industry

    Chapter 1: Cost of Accidents: Why Safety is Important?

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, November 9). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2021

    (News Release No. USDL-22-2139). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    History

    Over many, many years, it has become recognized that worker safety benefits business. Without workers, a
    business cannot survive. In this first unit, we learn a little about the history of the safety movement and how
    the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) came to exist.

    Tragedy is often the precursor to change. Unfortunately, tragedy affects lives, and in the workplace, the
    avoidance of tragedies has not always been at the forefront of decision-making. In the unit reading
    assignment, we look at one of the most horrific workplace tragedies in the United States. In the early part of
    the 20th Century in New York City, 146 workers lost their lives in what is known today as the Triangle
    Shirtwaist Factory Fire. This tragic event and others were integral to many advances in workplace safety.

    Also, up until the early part of the 20th century, as the textbook states, there was “little concern for the safety
    of workers and little incentive to be concerned” (Goetsch, 2018, p. 6). Workers were plentiful, including
    children, and the industrial revolution was booming. In the early part of the 20th century, workers became
    more valuable as industry continued to expand and war efforts needed workers. Losing a worker to the war
    efforts impacted businesses already; losing one to an injury was not acceptable as not only safety but quality
    suffered as well (Goetsch, 2018). As a result, safety programs began to be more common.

    In 1913, William B. Wilson was appointed as the first Secretary of Labor. His purpose was to guide the
    Department of Labor in improving working conditions for all Americans. Part of the duties of the Department of
    Labor was to ensure reporting of industrial diseases and accidents. Wilson had spent most of his career

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE

    History of the Safety Movement
    and the Cost of Accidents

    [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    working in the coal mines and had been an official with the United Mine Workers. His experiences led him to
    write a poem, quoted here, in 1903:

    Stalwart men were but as feathers
    Driven with a cyclone's fire.
    Fast their flesh and sinews shriveled,
    Scorched and roasted with the fire. (MacLaury, 1981, para. 14)

    What had started as the Bureau of Labor transformed into the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and, in
    the early days, focused on collecting data for accidents in the iron and steel industries. This was eventually
    updated to include other industries as well. Under Wilson’s guidance, and in keeping with his 1903 poem, the
    goal was to improve working conditions and to "Make the unhealthy occupations healthy” (MacLaury,
    1981, para. 15).

    That being said, and noting also that the safety movement has been in place for well over 100 years, we have
    some work to do! The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire kicked off the safety movement in a big way. But that is
    not the end of it—these incidents continue to happen:

    1978: Willow Island, West Virginia – 51 workers died in a collapse of a cooling tower that was being
    constructed
    1989: Pasadena, Texas, explosion at a refinery—23 workers never made it home, over 300 suffered
    injuries
    1991: Hamlet Chicken Processing Plant fire—25 worker deaths
    1988: Piper Alpha oil rig explosion—167 worker deaths
    1947: Texas City cargo ship explosion—estimation of between 500 and 600 worker and community
    deaths
    2008: Manhattan – 6 workers died as a result of a crane collapse
    2010: Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion—11 deaths
    2010: Upper Big Branch Mine coal dust explosion—29 deaths
    2010: Top Notch Cleaners, Alabama chemical asphyxiation—2 deaths
    2016: Miami, Florida – Pedestrian Bridge Collapse – killing 6
    2019: New Orleans – Hard Rock Hotel collapse during construction – 3 dead

    These are just the incidents that make the news. How many do not make the news but are just as serious?
    This is why we do what we do.

    Types of Accidents

    There are hazards we face in everyday life. In the workplace, these hazards become amplified as we are
    performing tasks that we are assigned, and we may have no input in or control over the design of the tasks.
    Some industries are more hazardous than others by their nature; however, there are hazards in every
    occupation. In looking at the types of occupations that are highly hazardous, we use industry classifications to
    determine which have more risks. These classifications can be found in the North American Industry
    Classification System (NAICS) and are tracked by the BLS. The data collected by these entities can be used
    to analyze trends and develop preventive measures within companies. When we look at the types of
    accidents, we can classify them into several groups. Nobody wants to go to work to die. Yet, in 2017, 5147
    workers lost their lives at work (BLS, 2019). And nobody wants to get injured or ill at work. An example of the
    type of data the BLS collects can be seen below. Looking beyond 2017, we see that there were 5,190 fatal
    work injuries recorded in the United States in 2021, an 8.9-percent increase from 4,764in 2020, the U.S.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (See chart 1 and table 1.) The fatal work injury rate as 3.6 fatalities
    per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers, up from 3.4 per 100,000 FTE in 2020, and up from the 2019
    pre-pandemic rate of 3.5. (See chart 2.) These data sets are from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
    (CFOI).

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    When you look at “Safety by the Numbers,” as illustrated above, you can see that there is a downward trend
    in injuries for all industries over the last several years. However, according to the BLS (2018), we have hit a
    plateau. In 2018 alone, private industry employers reported 2.8 million nonfatal workplace injuries and
    illnesses. Unfortunately, these numbers did not decrease from the statistics gathered in 2017 and continued
    steady through 2019, according to the BLS. There was a slight decrease in 2021 from 2020; however, into
    2022 the incident rates continue to rise.

    The statistics might not mean much on a broad basis. However, all of us probably know or know of someone
    who has suffered an injury or illness as a result of their work. We hear of the big accidents, crane collapses,
    trench collapses, fires, and explosions, but what about those we do not hear about: the everyday injuries
    occurring at work that cause us to lose workdays, seek medical treatment, and cause pain. Think about what
    you do every day at work. What are the hazards that can cause you harm: repetitive motions, improper lifting,
    exposure to chemicals? Sometimes, it really is the little things.

    As stated before, some industries are more hazardous than others, just by the very nature of the work.
    However, there are hazards everywhere.

    Example of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
    (Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    How do we prevent these?

    Think about this.

    What do you do in your daily work activities? Can you list your tasks? Do you recognize the hazards? Do you
    know how to control them?

    If you do a quick web search for "fast food restaurant chemical accidents," you will see a few of the tragic
    incidents that can happen when workers were just doing their jobs or cleaning up. The exposures from the
    chemicals used created a toxic atmosphere: a mixture of two chemicals that by themselves are very useful
    but when combined, cause deadly results.

    Under the OSHA standards, workers have specific rights and safeguards. One of those is under the “General
    Duty Clause,” which states, under the OSH Act of 1970 (2004):

    (a) Each employer —

    (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free
    from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
    his employees;

    (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

    (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations,
    and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.

    One other very important standard is the Hazard Communication Standard (2012), 1910.1200. Under this
    “HazCom” standard, the workers have the right to know and shall be trained on the substances they are
    working with.

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    The Cost of Accidents

    Accidents are not cheap—there is a cost attached to everything. And
    sometimes, those costs are not evident at first. For every class of
    accident, there will be a cost assigned—whether it is the cost of a
    Band-Aid or a trip to the clinic, property damage, auto accident, or
    other type of incident. Somebody is going to pay in some way for
    these accidents. An employer might carry insurance for these
    events; however, there are other costs associated with each
    accident. Whether out-of-pocket or through insurance premiums,
    deductibles, lost workdays and production, loss of use of equipment,
    or other losses—these all have costs attached to them. In order to
    move to prevent accidents, we have to consider all the costs
    attached to them.

    Sometimes, the simplest mistakes can be very costly. Consider
    example, for instance: on a construction project, the full use of PPE
    is required, including gloves. One of the younger workers did not like
    wearing gloves, so he cut the fingers out. Well, he picked up some
    metal ductwork, and gave himself a nasty gash across his fingers.
    Does this sound like a first aid treatment type of incident, not for this
    worker. He had to have surgery to repair the tendons on three of his
    fingers. They put him in a full arm cast with a metal halo to hold the
    pins in his fingers in place. He had to wear the brace for 8 weeks, followed by 6 more weeks of physical
    therapy. The medical costs were covered under insurance, of course. However, for the first 8 weeks, he could
    not perform his duties so somebody else had to do his work. Basically, paying for two people to do the job of
    one person. And, that person had to first be hired, and then trained. There was more overhead in hiring costs,
    benefits, and everything else that goes along with these types of losses. For the weeks of therapy, he could
    also only perform light duty, so the replacement worker was now the full-time worker.

    The cut resistant gloves he was supposed to be wearing (with the fingers intact) were priced around $14.00.

    References

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses–2017

    (News Release No. USDL-18-1788). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11082018.pdf

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019, December 17). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2018 (News

    Release No. USDL-19-2194). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Construction safety and the OSHA standards (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    MacLaury, J. (1981). The job safety law of 1970: Its passage was perilous. U.S. Department of Labor.

    https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/osha

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Hazard communication standard (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200). United
    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200

    OSH Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (2004).

    Torre, E. (n.d.). ID 23503494 [Illustration]. Dreamstime. https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-images-iceberg-

    image23503494

    (Adapted from Torre, n.d.)

    OSH 2304, Introduction to Contractor Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    To learn more about historical workplace incidents and how industries are classified, please visit these sites:

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Industry injury and illness data. United States Department of Labor.

    https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, November 8). Injuries, ilnesses and fatalities: Incidence rates of nonfatal

    occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2017. United States Department of
    Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, June 11). Achievements in public health, 1900-1999:

    Improvements in workplace safety — United States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
    Report, 48(22), 461–469. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The triangle shirtwaist factory fire. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html

    North American Industry Classification System. (2019, November 13). Introduction to NAICS. United States

    Census Bureau.
    https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to
    %20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm)

    [https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/summ1_00_2017.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4822a1.htm)

    [https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html](https://www.osha.gov/oas/trianglefactoryfire.html)

    [https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.](https://www.census.gov/naics/#:~:text=The%20North%20American%20Industry%20Classification,to%20the%20U.S.%20business%20economy.)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – History
    – Types of Accidents
    – The Cost of Accidents
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

  • [Solved] DB1 OSHA 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## DB1OSH2303.docx – ## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf **## DB1OSH2303.docx** DB 1 OSH 2303-19.01.01-6B26-S2, Hazardous Materials Safety Initial Post: Discuss the hazard communication (HazCom) program at your current organization or one you used to work for. What do you think works…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## DB1OSH2303.docx

    – ## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf

    **## DB1OSH2303.docx**

    DB 1 OSH 2303-19.01.01-6B26-S2, Hazardous Materials Safety

    Initial Post:

    Discuss the hazard communication (HazCom) program at your current organization or one you used to work for. What do you think works, and what needs to be improved? If you do not currently work for an organization that has a HazCom program, discuss which element of a HazCom program you believe would be the most difficult to implement.

    Reply 1:
    **William Heffker**

    Top of Form

    My name is Bill Heffker, and I currently live in Slidell, Louisiana. I work as a Safety Advisor in the oil and gas industry, a field I have been in for over 12 years. Right now, my focus is finishing up my Associate degree in Occupational Safety and Health this September, and I plan to transition immediately into my Bachelor’s degree afterward. Long-term, my goal is to continue moving up into higher leadership roles within industrial safety management. In the oil and gas sector, our Hazard Communication program is absolutely critical because we deal with various types of chemicals. What works really well in our organization is the digitization of our Safety Data Sheets. Our field crews can access any SDS instantly on their phones or tablets while out on a site. This is a massive improvement from the old days of flipping through giant, grease-stained binders in a truck trunk, and it makes finding emergency response information incredibly fast. However, if there is one area that always needs improvement, it is chemical labeling out in the field. When chemicals are transferred from large bulk containers into smaller secondary containers, employees do not always ensure that correct labeling goes on to the new containers. This can create a serious problem when we do not know what material is in a container. I’m looking forward to learning more about how HazCom and how it is handled in different industries.

    Reply 2: Bottom of Form

    **Raymond Hill**

    Top of Form

    Good morning class, my name is Raymond Hill and I’m originally from NY but now reside in NC. I love it here and wouldn’t trade it for the world. I currently work for a General Contractor (Turner construction) and currently building an addition to a pharmaceutical company. My current title is General Foreman. My future goal is to become a safety supervisor and eventually growing into a director of safety.

    The Hazard Communication (HazCom) program at turner construction plays an important role in maintaining safety on construction sites. The program is designed to ensure employees understand the hazards associated with chemicals and materials they may encounter while working. One aspect that works well is the company’s commitment to regular safety meetings and training sessions. Employees are often reminded about proper labeling, the use of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), and the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). These practices help create a stronger safety culture and reduce workplace accidents.

    Another positive feature is the accessibility of hazard information. Workers are generally able to locate SDS documents and receive guidance from supervisors when questions arise. This helps employees feel more confident when handling potentially dangerous substances.

    However, there are still areas that could be improved. At times, communication between subcontractors and workers can be inconsistent, especially on large projects with many teams involved. Some workers may also rush through training without fully understanding the material. To improve the HazCom program, Turner Construction could provide more hands on training and increase multilingual communication resources for diverse jobsite crews. Overall, the HazCom program is effective, but continuous improvements can make the workplace even safer.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize the requirements governing the management of hazardous substances.
    1.1 Explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard

    Communication regulation is used to manage hazardous substances.
    1.2 Develop a method to implement a hazardous communications program for a company.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations Issues, pp. 81–137

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Learn more about the health hazard and physical criteria that the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) uses to determine if a substance is hazardous by reviewing the resources below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Health hazard criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App A). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Physical criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App B). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB

    Unit Lesson

    Global Harmonization

    The course textbook was published in 2012, a few months before the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard was updated to be consistent with the
    United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). In addition
    to aligning the United States with the HazCom system used by many of its trade partners, the standardization
    of the safety data sheet format and the standardized classification and labeling of chemicals improves the
    quality and consistency of health hazard information in American workplaces. Adoption of GHS changed
    many of the definitions related to hazardous materials in the HazCom Standard and other OSHA standards
    related to hazardous materials. For example, in the 2012 HazCom Standard, a flammable liquid is now
    defined as a liquid having a flash point of no more than 93°C (199.4°F). Flammable liquids are then further
    divided into four subcategories based on the flash points (OSHA, 2013a). Combustible liquid as a category no
    longer appears in the standard. These same changes were also made in 29 Code of Federal Regulations
    (CFR) §1910.106, Flammable Liquids, which used to be titled “Flammable and Combustible Liquids.”

    Another significant change is the replacement of the term material safety data sheet (MSDS) with safety data
    sheet (SDS). MSDS is used in the course textbook, but all other course documents, including the lessons,
    assessments, and assignments will refer only to SDS.

    The 2012 HazCom revision was implemented in phases. Employee training on the new labels and SDS
    format was to be completed by December 1, 2013. Full compliance with new labeling requirements by June 1,

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Introduction to the Laws, Regulations, and
    Standards That Apply to Hazardous
    Materials Management

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    2015, was required for chemical manufacturers and importers. Compliance with all provisions of the revised
    standard, including replacement of alternate labeling systems, was required by June 1, 2016 (OSHA, 2013a).

    Although some of the information in Chapter 3 is based on the OSHA HazCom Standard prior to 2012, it still
    contains a significant amount of best practice information. For specific OSHA compliance requirements,
    accessing the standard through the OSHA website is recommended. If you want to use a printed version of
    the OSHA standards, be sure it was published after March 2012. OSHA has a webpage showing a side-by-
    side comparison of the 1994 and 2012 HazCom Standards that you can use to determine what has or has
    not changed.

    Hazardous Materials in the Workplace

    Workers have a right to know what chemicals are used in their workplaces, what risks these chemical hazards
    present, and how to protect themselves against the hazards. These are the values that form the foundation of
    OSHA’s HazCom Standard (Haight, 2012). While these principles of worker protection may appear self-
    evident, it was not until 1983 that they became codified in an OSHA standard. After more than 30 years,
    violations of the HazCom Standard are still among the most frequent citations issued by OSHA and among
    the top 10 in highest penalties assessed (Haight, 2012; OSHA, n.d.).

    In this unit, we review the regulations that govern the rights to know issues and examine the complexities
    involved with the effective implementation of the rules. Along the way, we may gain some insight into why
    there are so many violations and fines involved.

    OSHA (1998) estimates that there are 32 million workers exposed daily to one or more of the 650,000
    chemicals and chemical products in use today. In addition, new chemicals are continually being developed
    and introduced into the workplace. While some
    of these chemicals, such as ammonia, are easy
    to detect and the effects of exposure are
    obvious, many other chemicals, such as lead,
    cause no immediate worker distress upon
    exposure but can result in serious chronic
    illness, even at low-level exposure. The
    HazCom Standard is designed to provide a
    methodology to ensure that workers are not
    adversely affected by hazardous substances in
    the workplace.

    Effective control of hazardous materials in the
    workplace starts with chemical manufacturers
    and importers. The HazCom Standard requires
    them to analyze their chemicals and chemical
    compounds for hazards. They must then compile information about the hazards and provide this information
    to their employees and to anyone who buys or uses the substances. Employers who distribute, buy, or use
    the substances must pass the safety information on to their employees, and all employees must comply with
    the requirements for safe storage, handling, and use. It is a simple concept, but it is difficult to implement, as
    indicated by the number of violations documented annually.

    Haight (2012) suggests that employers complete five tasks to ensure effective implementation.

    • Develop a written HazCom program.
    • Create an up-to-date hazardous chemical inventory.
    • Have all hazardous materials properly labeled.
    • Make accessible to all employees an SDS for every chemical that is covered by the standard.
    • Properly instruct, train, and provide required information to all affected employees.

    OSHA (2014) recommends following the seven steps in order to implement an effective HazCom program.

    • Learn the standard, and identify responsible staff.
    • Prepare and implement a written HazCom program.

    HazCom wallet card
    (OSHA, 2013b)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Ensure containers are labeled.
    • Maintain SDSs.
    • Inform and train employees.
    • Evaluate and reassess your program.

    While the lists are similar, it should be noted that OSHA starts with learning the standard. Haight (2012)
    implies that learning the standard is a part of developing the written program. Similarly, Haight (2012) includes
    creating a hazardous material inventory as a separate task, while OSHA embeds the inventory in the written
    program step. Perhaps the most significant difference in the two approaches is OSHA’s inclusion of
    evaluating and reassessing the program as the final step. Evaluating the program means measuring
    compliance with the requirements of the OSHA standard as well as the effectiveness of the program. Program
    updates are needed if new chemicals are introduced into the workplace or if processes are changed.
    Inspections should be conducted to ensure labels on containers are intact and SDSs are kept current.

    Written HazCom Programs

    Many of the OSHA standards contain a requirement for a written program. In addition to the HazCom
    Standard, written programs are required in the OSHA standards for respiratory protection, hearing
    conservation, confined space entry, and others. Written programs ensure systematic development of
    compliance measures and ensure all elements are adequately addressed (OSHA, 2014). A cornerstone of the
    written program for HazCom is the hazardous materials inventory. Developing a comprehensive inventory
    may seem like an insurmountable task, but keep in mind that chemical manufacturers and importers are the
    ones required to prepare and provide SDSs. If your organization is not a chemical manufacturer or importer,
    then you should have already received an SDS for every hazardous chemical you purchased. This is a good
    place to start. If you do not have an SDS for a chemical, you can refer to the product label, which must
    include the name and address of the manufacturer from whom you can request the SDS. In some cases, a
    process may result in the creation of a hazardous substance. Since there is no manufacturer or importer, it is
    incumbent on the employer to develop or hire someone to develop the required SDS. The Appendix A: Health
    Hazard Criteria webpage and the Appendix B: Physical Criteria webpage provide guidelines for evaluating the
    health and physical hazards of substances but require significant expertise to be used effectively. Remember
    that if your organization, for whatever reason, develops its own SDS, it is responsible and liable for the
    accuracy of the information.

    The written program must also include procedures to ensure the hazardous materials inventory is kept
    current; new chemicals must be identified and added as they arrive, and chemicals no longer used must be
    deleted. An accurate, current inventory provides the basis for most of the other requirements of the standard.

    The good news is that there are numerous resources available to help you develop a written HazCom
    program. Free materials are available from OSHA and many state occupational safety and health offices. The
    HazCom Standard has also spawned a cottage industry of consultants who will be happy to help you for a
    price. Try entering "OSHA HazCom Standard" into your favorite internet search engine. The course textbook
    also offers a sample written program. When using any third-party resources, be sure they are based on the
    2012 changes to the HazCom Standard.

    The next unit will cover the regulations that apply to hazardous wastes. Subsequent units will provide
    information about control methods, hazardous spill response, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
    requirements for the transport of hazardous materials and wastes, and the benchmarking of programs.

    References

    Haight, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Hazardous material management and hazard communication. American Society of

    Safety Engineers.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Top 10 most frequently cited standards for fiscal year

    2018 (Oct. 1, 2017, to Sept. 30, 2018). United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Top_Ten_Standards.html

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1998). Chemical hazard communication (OSHA Document
    No. 3084). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3084.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013a). Foundation of workplace chemical safety programs:

    The globally harmonized system for hazard communication. United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013b). Hazard communication OSHA 3658 [Image].

    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3658.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2014). Steps to an effective hazard communication program

    for employers that use hazardous chemicals [Fact sheet]. U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3696.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Read about the United Nations Global Harmonization System, which was the basis for the 2012 revisions to
    the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    State Requirements
    If your state has a state plan approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    research the hazard communication (HazCom) requirements of the plan, and compare and contrast them with
    the OSHA HazCom Standard. If your state does not have its own plan, research the HazCom requirements
    for California. Do you have any recommendations for improvements to your state’s or California’s plan? Note
    your thoughts in a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?
    Review the written HazCom program for your current organization. Does it contain all of the required
    information? If it does not, explain what is missing. Would you recommend any changes to the existing
    content of the program? What improvements can you recommend? Explain your ideas. Note your thoughts in
    a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Global Harmonization
    – Hazardous Materials in the Workplace
    – Written HazCom Programs
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)
    – State Requirements
    – Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize the requirements governing the management of hazardous substances.
    1.1 Explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard

    Communication regulation is used to manage hazardous substances.
    1.2 Develop a method to implement a hazardous communications program for a company.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations Issues, pp. 81–137

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Learn more about the health hazard and physical criteria that the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) uses to determine if a substance is hazardous by reviewing the resources below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Health hazard criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App A). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Physical criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App B). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB

    Unit Lesson

    Global Harmonization

    The course textbook was published in 2012, a few months before the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard was updated to be consistent with the
    United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). In addition
    to aligning the United States with the HazCom system used by many of its trade partners, the standardization
    of the safety data sheet format and the standardized classification and labeling of chemicals improves the
    quality and consistency of health hazard information in American workplaces. Adoption of GHS changed
    many of the definitions related to hazardous materials in the HazCom Standard and other OSHA standards
    related to hazardous materials. For example, in the 2012 HazCom Standard, a flammable liquid is now
    defined as a liquid having a flash point of no more than 93°C (199.4°F). Flammable liquids are then further
    divided into four subcategories based on the flash points (OSHA, 2013a). Combustible liquid as a category no
    longer appears in the standard. These same changes were also made in 29 Code of Federal Regulations
    (CFR) §1910.106, Flammable Liquids, which used to be titled “Flammable and Combustible Liquids.”

    Another significant change is the replacement of the term material safety data sheet (MSDS) with safety data
    sheet (SDS). MSDS is used in the course textbook, but all other course documents, including the lessons,
    assessments, and assignments will refer only to SDS.

    The 2012 HazCom revision was implemented in phases. Employee training on the new labels and SDS
    format was to be completed by December 1, 2013. Full compliance with new labeling requirements by June 1,

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Introduction to the Laws, Regulations, and
    Standards That Apply to Hazardous
    Materials Management

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    2015, was required for chemical manufacturers and importers. Compliance with all provisions of the revised
    standard, including replacement of alternate labeling systems, was required by June 1, 2016 (OSHA, 2013a).

    Although some of the information in Chapter 3 is based on the OSHA HazCom Standard prior to 2012, it still
    contains a significant amount of best practice information. For specific OSHA compliance requirements,
    accessing the standard through the OSHA website is recommended. If you want to use a printed version of
    the OSHA standards, be sure it was published after March 2012. OSHA has a webpage showing a side-by-
    side comparison of the 1994 and 2012 HazCom Standards that you can use to determine what has or has
    not changed.

    Hazardous Materials in the Workplace

    Workers have a right to know what chemicals are used in their workplaces, what risks these chemical hazards
    present, and how to protect themselves against the hazards. These are the values that form the foundation of
    OSHA’s HazCom Standard (Haight, 2012). While these principles of worker protection may appear self-
    evident, it was not until 1983 that they became codified in an OSHA standard. After more than 30 years,
    violations of the HazCom Standard are still among the most frequent citations issued by OSHA and among
    the top 10 in highest penalties assessed (Haight, 2012; OSHA, n.d.).

    In this unit, we review the regulations that govern the rights to know issues and examine the complexities
    involved with the effective implementation of the rules. Along the way, we may gain some insight into why
    there are so many violations and fines involved.

    OSHA (1998) estimates that there are 32 million workers exposed daily to one or more of the 650,000
    chemicals and chemical products in use today. In addition, new chemicals are continually being developed
    and introduced into the workplace. While some
    of these chemicals, such as ammonia, are easy
    to detect and the effects of exposure are
    obvious, many other chemicals, such as lead,
    cause no immediate worker distress upon
    exposure but can result in serious chronic
    illness, even at low-level exposure. The
    HazCom Standard is designed to provide a
    methodology to ensure that workers are not
    adversely affected by hazardous substances in
    the workplace.

    Effective control of hazardous materials in the
    workplace starts with chemical manufacturers
    and importers. The HazCom Standard requires
    them to analyze their chemicals and chemical
    compounds for hazards. They must then compile information about the hazards and provide this information
    to their employees and to anyone who buys or uses the substances. Employers who distribute, buy, or use
    the substances must pass the safety information on to their employees, and all employees must comply with
    the requirements for safe storage, handling, and use. It is a simple concept, but it is difficult to implement, as
    indicated by the number of violations documented annually.

    Haight (2012) suggests that employers complete five tasks to ensure effective implementation.

    • Develop a written HazCom program.
    • Create an up-to-date hazardous chemical inventory.
    • Have all hazardous materials properly labeled.
    • Make accessible to all employees an SDS for every chemical that is covered by the standard.
    • Properly instruct, train, and provide required information to all affected employees.

    OSHA (2014) recommends following the seven steps in order to implement an effective HazCom program.

    • Learn the standard, and identify responsible staff.
    • Prepare and implement a written HazCom program.

    HazCom wallet card
    (OSHA, 2013b)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Ensure containers are labeled.
    • Maintain SDSs.
    • Inform and train employees.
    • Evaluate and reassess your program.

    While the lists are similar, it should be noted that OSHA starts with learning the standard. Haight (2012)
    implies that learning the standard is a part of developing the written program. Similarly, Haight (2012) includes
    creating a hazardous material inventory as a separate task, while OSHA embeds the inventory in the written
    program step. Perhaps the most significant difference in the two approaches is OSHA’s inclusion of
    evaluating and reassessing the program as the final step. Evaluating the program means measuring
    compliance with the requirements of the OSHA standard as well as the effectiveness of the program. Program
    updates are needed if new chemicals are introduced into the workplace or if processes are changed.
    Inspections should be conducted to ensure labels on containers are intact and SDSs are kept current.

    Written HazCom Programs

    Many of the OSHA standards contain a requirement for a written program. In addition to the HazCom
    Standard, written programs are required in the OSHA standards for respiratory protection, hearing
    conservation, confined space entry, and others. Written programs ensure systematic development of
    compliance measures and ensure all elements are adequately addressed (OSHA, 2014). A cornerstone of the
    written program for HazCom is the hazardous materials inventory. Developing a comprehensive inventory
    may seem like an insurmountable task, but keep in mind that chemical manufacturers and importers are the
    ones required to prepare and provide SDSs. If your organization is not a chemical manufacturer or importer,
    then you should have already received an SDS for every hazardous chemical you purchased. This is a good
    place to start. If you do not have an SDS for a chemical, you can refer to the product label, which must
    include the name and address of the manufacturer from whom you can request the SDS. In some cases, a
    process may result in the creation of a hazardous substance. Since there is no manufacturer or importer, it is
    incumbent on the employer to develop or hire someone to develop the required SDS. The Appendix A: Health
    Hazard Criteria webpage and the Appendix B: Physical Criteria webpage provide guidelines for evaluating the
    health and physical hazards of substances but require significant expertise to be used effectively. Remember
    that if your organization, for whatever reason, develops its own SDS, it is responsible and liable for the
    accuracy of the information.

    The written program must also include procedures to ensure the hazardous materials inventory is kept
    current; new chemicals must be identified and added as they arrive, and chemicals no longer used must be
    deleted. An accurate, current inventory provides the basis for most of the other requirements of the standard.

    The good news is that there are numerous resources available to help you develop a written HazCom
    program. Free materials are available from OSHA and many state occupational safety and health offices. The
    HazCom Standard has also spawned a cottage industry of consultants who will be happy to help you for a
    price. Try entering "OSHA HazCom Standard" into your favorite internet search engine. The course textbook
    also offers a sample written program. When using any third-party resources, be sure they are based on the
    2012 changes to the HazCom Standard.

    The next unit will cover the regulations that apply to hazardous wastes. Subsequent units will provide
    information about control methods, hazardous spill response, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
    requirements for the transport of hazardous materials and wastes, and the benchmarking of programs.

    References

    Haight, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Hazardous material management and hazard communication. American Society of

    Safety Engineers.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Top 10 most frequently cited standards for fiscal year

    2018 (Oct. 1, 2017, to Sept. 30, 2018). United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Top_Ten_Standards.html

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1998). Chemical hazard communication (OSHA Document
    No. 3084). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3084.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013a). Foundation of workplace chemical safety programs:

    The globally harmonized system for hazard communication. United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013b). Hazard communication OSHA 3658 [Image].

    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3658.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2014). Steps to an effective hazard communication program

    for employers that use hazardous chemicals [Fact sheet]. U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3696.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Read about the United Nations Global Harmonization System, which was the basis for the 2012 revisions to
    the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    State Requirements
    If your state has a state plan approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    research the hazard communication (HazCom) requirements of the plan, and compare and contrast them with
    the OSHA HazCom Standard. If your state does not have its own plan, research the HazCom requirements
    for California. Do you have any recommendations for improvements to your state’s or California’s plan? Note
    your thoughts in a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?
    Review the written HazCom program for your current organization. Does it contain all of the required
    information? If it does not, explain what is missing. Would you recommend any changes to the existing
    content of the program? What improvements can you recommend? Explain your ideas. Note your thoughts in
    a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Global Harmonization
    – Hazardous Materials in the Workplace
    – Written HazCom Programs
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)
    – State Requirements
    – Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?

    **## DB1OSH2303.docx**

    DB 1 OSH 2303-19.01.01-6B26-S2, Hazardous Materials Safety

    Initial Post:

    Discuss the hazard communication (HazCom) program at your current organization or one you used to work for. What do you think works, and what needs to be improved? If you do not currently work for an organization that has a HazCom program, discuss which element of a HazCom program you believe would be the most difficult to implement.

    Reply 1:
    **William Heffker**

    Top of Form

    My name is Bill Heffker, and I currently live in Slidell, Louisiana. I work as a Safety Advisor in the oil and gas industry, a field I have been in for over 12 years. Right now, my focus is finishing up my Associate degree in Occupational Safety and Health this September, and I plan to transition immediately into my Bachelor’s degree afterward. Long-term, my goal is to continue moving up into higher leadership roles within industrial safety management. In the oil and gas sector, our Hazard Communication program is absolutely critical because we deal with various types of chemicals. What works really well in our organization is the digitization of our Safety Data Sheets. Our field crews can access any SDS instantly on their phones or tablets while out on a site. This is a massive improvement from the old days of flipping through giant, grease-stained binders in a truck trunk, and it makes finding emergency response information incredibly fast. However, if there is one area that always needs improvement, it is chemical labeling out in the field. When chemicals are transferred from large bulk containers into smaller secondary containers, employees do not always ensure that correct labeling goes on to the new containers. This can create a serious problem when we do not know what material is in a container. I’m looking forward to learning more about how HazCom and how it is handled in different industries.

    Reply 2: Bottom of Form

    **Raymond Hill**

    Top of Form

    Good morning class, my name is Raymond Hill and I’m originally from NY but now reside in NC. I love it here and wouldn’t trade it for the world. I currently work for a General Contractor (Turner construction) and currently building an addition to a pharmaceutical company. My current title is General Foreman. My future goal is to become a safety supervisor and eventually growing into a director of safety.

    The Hazard Communication (HazCom) program at turner construction plays an important role in maintaining safety on construction sites. The program is designed to ensure employees understand the hazards associated with chemicals and materials they may encounter while working. One aspect that works well is the company’s commitment to regular safety meetings and training sessions. Employees are often reminded about proper labeling, the use of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), and the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). These practices help create a stronger safety culture and reduce workplace accidents.

    Another positive feature is the accessibility of hazard information. Workers are generally able to locate SDS documents and receive guidance from supervisors when questions arise. This helps employees feel more confident when handling potentially dangerous substances.

    However, there are still areas that could be improved. At times, communication between subcontractors and workers can be inconsistent, especially on large projects with many teams involved. Some workers may also rush through training without fully understanding the material. To improve the HazCom program, Turner Construction could provide more hands on training and increase multilingual communication resources for diverse jobsite crews. Overall, the HazCom program is effective, but continuous improvements can make the workplace even safer.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize the requirements governing the management of hazardous substances.
    1.1 Explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard

    Communication regulation is used to manage hazardous substances.
    1.2 Develop a method to implement a hazardous communications program for a company.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations Issues, pp. 81–137

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Learn more about the health hazard and physical criteria that the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) uses to determine if a substance is hazardous by reviewing the resources below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Health hazard criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App A). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Physical criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App B). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB

    Unit Lesson

    Global Harmonization

    The course textbook was published in 2012, a few months before the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard was updated to be consistent with the
    United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). In addition
    to aligning the United States with the HazCom system used by many of its trade partners, the standardization
    of the safety data sheet format and the standardized classification and labeling of chemicals improves the
    quality and consistency of health hazard information in American workplaces. Adoption of GHS changed
    many of the definitions related to hazardous materials in the HazCom Standard and other OSHA standards
    related to hazardous materials. For example, in the 2012 HazCom Standard, a flammable liquid is now
    defined as a liquid having a flash point of no more than 93°C (199.4°F). Flammable liquids are then further
    divided into four subcategories based on the flash points (OSHA, 2013a). Combustible liquid as a category no
    longer appears in the standard. These same changes were also made in 29 Code of Federal Regulations
    (CFR) §1910.106, Flammable Liquids, which used to be titled “Flammable and Combustible Liquids.”

    Another significant change is the replacement of the term material safety data sheet (MSDS) with safety data
    sheet (SDS). MSDS is used in the course textbook, but all other course documents, including the lessons,
    assessments, and assignments will refer only to SDS.

    The 2012 HazCom revision was implemented in phases. Employee training on the new labels and SDS
    format was to be completed by December 1, 2013. Full compliance with new labeling requirements by June 1,

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Introduction to the Laws, Regulations, and
    Standards That Apply to Hazardous
    Materials Management

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    2015, was required for chemical manufacturers and importers. Compliance with all provisions of the revised
    standard, including replacement of alternate labeling systems, was required by June 1, 2016 (OSHA, 2013a).

    Although some of the information in Chapter 3 is based on the OSHA HazCom Standard prior to 2012, it still
    contains a significant amount of best practice information. For specific OSHA compliance requirements,
    accessing the standard through the OSHA website is recommended. If you want to use a printed version of
    the OSHA standards, be sure it was published after March 2012. OSHA has a webpage showing a side-by-
    side comparison of the 1994 and 2012 HazCom Standards that you can use to determine what has or has
    not changed.

    Hazardous Materials in the Workplace

    Workers have a right to know what chemicals are used in their workplaces, what risks these chemical hazards
    present, and how to protect themselves against the hazards. These are the values that form the foundation of
    OSHA’s HazCom Standard (Haight, 2012). While these principles of worker protection may appear self-
    evident, it was not until 1983 that they became codified in an OSHA standard. After more than 30 years,
    violations of the HazCom Standard are still among the most frequent citations issued by OSHA and among
    the top 10 in highest penalties assessed (Haight, 2012; OSHA, n.d.).

    In this unit, we review the regulations that govern the rights to know issues and examine the complexities
    involved with the effective implementation of the rules. Along the way, we may gain some insight into why
    there are so many violations and fines involved.

    OSHA (1998) estimates that there are 32 million workers exposed daily to one or more of the 650,000
    chemicals and chemical products in use today. In addition, new chemicals are continually being developed
    and introduced into the workplace. While some
    of these chemicals, such as ammonia, are easy
    to detect and the effects of exposure are
    obvious, many other chemicals, such as lead,
    cause no immediate worker distress upon
    exposure but can result in serious chronic
    illness, even at low-level exposure. The
    HazCom Standard is designed to provide a
    methodology to ensure that workers are not
    adversely affected by hazardous substances in
    the workplace.

    Effective control of hazardous materials in the
    workplace starts with chemical manufacturers
    and importers. The HazCom Standard requires
    them to analyze their chemicals and chemical
    compounds for hazards. They must then compile information about the hazards and provide this information
    to their employees and to anyone who buys or uses the substances. Employers who distribute, buy, or use
    the substances must pass the safety information on to their employees, and all employees must comply with
    the requirements for safe storage, handling, and use. It is a simple concept, but it is difficult to implement, as
    indicated by the number of violations documented annually.

    Haight (2012) suggests that employers complete five tasks to ensure effective implementation.

    • Develop a written HazCom program.
    • Create an up-to-date hazardous chemical inventory.
    • Have all hazardous materials properly labeled.
    • Make accessible to all employees an SDS for every chemical that is covered by the standard.
    • Properly instruct, train, and provide required information to all affected employees.

    OSHA (2014) recommends following the seven steps in order to implement an effective HazCom program.

    • Learn the standard, and identify responsible staff.
    • Prepare and implement a written HazCom program.

    HazCom wallet card
    (OSHA, 2013b)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Ensure containers are labeled.
    • Maintain SDSs.
    • Inform and train employees.
    • Evaluate and reassess your program.

    While the lists are similar, it should be noted that OSHA starts with learning the standard. Haight (2012)
    implies that learning the standard is a part of developing the written program. Similarly, Haight (2012) includes
    creating a hazardous material inventory as a separate task, while OSHA embeds the inventory in the written
    program step. Perhaps the most significant difference in the two approaches is OSHA’s inclusion of
    evaluating and reassessing the program as the final step. Evaluating the program means measuring
    compliance with the requirements of the OSHA standard as well as the effectiveness of the program. Program
    updates are needed if new chemicals are introduced into the workplace or if processes are changed.
    Inspections should be conducted to ensure labels on containers are intact and SDSs are kept current.

    Written HazCom Programs

    Many of the OSHA standards contain a requirement for a written program. In addition to the HazCom
    Standard, written programs are required in the OSHA standards for respiratory protection, hearing
    conservation, confined space entry, and others. Written programs ensure systematic development of
    compliance measures and ensure all elements are adequately addressed (OSHA, 2014). A cornerstone of the
    written program for HazCom is the hazardous materials inventory. Developing a comprehensive inventory
    may seem like an insurmountable task, but keep in mind that chemical manufacturers and importers are the
    ones required to prepare and provide SDSs. If your organization is not a chemical manufacturer or importer,
    then you should have already received an SDS for every hazardous chemical you purchased. This is a good
    place to start. If you do not have an SDS for a chemical, you can refer to the product label, which must
    include the name and address of the manufacturer from whom you can request the SDS. In some cases, a
    process may result in the creation of a hazardous substance. Since there is no manufacturer or importer, it is
    incumbent on the employer to develop or hire someone to develop the required SDS. The Appendix A: Health
    Hazard Criteria webpage and the Appendix B: Physical Criteria webpage provide guidelines for evaluating the
    health and physical hazards of substances but require significant expertise to be used effectively. Remember
    that if your organization, for whatever reason, develops its own SDS, it is responsible and liable for the
    accuracy of the information.

    The written program must also include procedures to ensure the hazardous materials inventory is kept
    current; new chemicals must be identified and added as they arrive, and chemicals no longer used must be
    deleted. An accurate, current inventory provides the basis for most of the other requirements of the standard.

    The good news is that there are numerous resources available to help you develop a written HazCom
    program. Free materials are available from OSHA and many state occupational safety and health offices. The
    HazCom Standard has also spawned a cottage industry of consultants who will be happy to help you for a
    price. Try entering "OSHA HazCom Standard" into your favorite internet search engine. The course textbook
    also offers a sample written program. When using any third-party resources, be sure they are based on the
    2012 changes to the HazCom Standard.

    The next unit will cover the regulations that apply to hazardous wastes. Subsequent units will provide
    information about control methods, hazardous spill response, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
    requirements for the transport of hazardous materials and wastes, and the benchmarking of programs.

    References

    Haight, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Hazardous material management and hazard communication. American Society of

    Safety Engineers.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Top 10 most frequently cited standards for fiscal year

    2018 (Oct. 1, 2017, to Sept. 30, 2018). United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Top_Ten_Standards.html

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1998). Chemical hazard communication (OSHA Document
    No. 3084). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3084.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013a). Foundation of workplace chemical safety programs:

    The globally harmonized system for hazard communication. United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013b). Hazard communication OSHA 3658 [Image].

    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3658.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2014). Steps to an effective hazard communication program

    for employers that use hazardous chemicals [Fact sheet]. U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3696.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Read about the United Nations Global Harmonization System, which was the basis for the 2012 revisions to
    the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    State Requirements
    If your state has a state plan approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    research the hazard communication (HazCom) requirements of the plan, and compare and contrast them with
    the OSHA HazCom Standard. If your state does not have its own plan, research the HazCom requirements
    for California. Do you have any recommendations for improvements to your state’s or California’s plan? Note
    your thoughts in a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?
    Review the written HazCom program for your current organization. Does it contain all of the required
    information? If it does not, explain what is missing. Would you recommend any changes to the existing
    content of the program? What improvements can you recommend? Explain your ideas. Note your thoughts in
    a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Global Harmonization
    – Hazardous Materials in the Workplace
    – Written HazCom Programs
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)
    – State Requirements
    – Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?

    **## DB1OSH2303.docx**

    DB 1 OSH 2303-19.01.01-6B26-S2, Hazardous Materials Safety

    Initial Post:

    Discuss the hazard communication (HazCom) program at your current organization or one you used to work for. What do you think works, and what needs to be improved? If you do not currently work for an organization that has a HazCom program, discuss which element of a HazCom program you believe would be the most difficult to implement.

    Reply 1:
    **William Heffker**

    Top of Form

    My name is Bill Heffker, and I currently live in Slidell, Louisiana. I work as a Safety Advisor in the oil and gas industry, a field I have been in for over 12 years. Right now, my focus is finishing up my Associate degree in Occupational Safety and Health this September, and I plan to transition immediately into my Bachelor’s degree afterward. Long-term, my goal is to continue moving up into higher leadership roles within industrial safety management. In the oil and gas sector, our Hazard Communication program is absolutely critical because we deal with various types of chemicals. What works really well in our organization is the digitization of our Safety Data Sheets. Our field crews can access any SDS instantly on their phones or tablets while out on a site. This is a massive improvement from the old days of flipping through giant, grease-stained binders in a truck trunk, and it makes finding emergency response information incredibly fast. However, if there is one area that always needs improvement, it is chemical labeling out in the field. When chemicals are transferred from large bulk containers into smaller secondary containers, employees do not always ensure that correct labeling goes on to the new containers. This can create a serious problem when we do not know what material is in a container. I’m looking forward to learning more about how HazCom and how it is handled in different industries.

    Reply 2: Bottom of Form

    **Raymond Hill**

    Top of Form

    Good morning class, my name is Raymond Hill and I’m originally from NY but now reside in NC. I love it here and wouldn’t trade it for the world. I currently work for a General Contractor (Turner construction) and currently building an addition to a pharmaceutical company. My current title is General Foreman. My future goal is to become a safety supervisor and eventually growing into a director of safety.

    The Hazard Communication (HazCom) program at turner construction plays an important role in maintaining safety on construction sites. The program is designed to ensure employees understand the hazards associated with chemicals and materials they may encounter while working. One aspect that works well is the company’s commitment to regular safety meetings and training sessions. Employees are often reminded about proper labeling, the use of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), and the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). These practices help create a stronger safety culture and reduce workplace accidents.

    Another positive feature is the accessibility of hazard information. Workers are generally able to locate SDS documents and receive guidance from supervisors when questions arise. This helps employees feel more confident when handling potentially dangerous substances.

    However, there are still areas that could be improved. At times, communication between subcontractors and workers can be inconsistent, especially on large projects with many teams involved. Some workers may also rush through training without fully understanding the material. To improve the HazCom program, Turner Construction could provide more hands on training and increase multilingual communication resources for diverse jobsite crews. Overall, the HazCom program is effective, but continuous improvements can make the workplace even safer.

    Bottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Summarize the requirements governing the management of hazardous substances.
    1.1 Explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard

    Communication regulation is used to manage hazardous substances.
    1.2 Develop a method to implement a hazardous communications program for a company.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Hazard Communication and Right-to-Know Regulations Issues, pp. 81–137

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Learn more about the health hazard and physical criteria that the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) uses to determine if a substance is hazardous by reviewing the resources below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Health hazard criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App A). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1970). Occupational safety and health standards: Toxic and

    hazardous substances: Physical criteria (OSHA Standard No. 1910.1200 App B). United States
    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/laws-
    regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB

    Unit Lesson

    Global Harmonization

    The course textbook was published in 2012, a few months before the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard was updated to be consistent with the
    United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). In addition
    to aligning the United States with the HazCom system used by many of its trade partners, the standardization
    of the safety data sheet format and the standardized classification and labeling of chemicals improves the
    quality and consistency of health hazard information in American workplaces. Adoption of GHS changed
    many of the definitions related to hazardous materials in the HazCom Standard and other OSHA standards
    related to hazardous materials. For example, in the 2012 HazCom Standard, a flammable liquid is now
    defined as a liquid having a flash point of no more than 93°C (199.4°F). Flammable liquids are then further
    divided into four subcategories based on the flash points (OSHA, 2013a). Combustible liquid as a category no
    longer appears in the standard. These same changes were also made in 29 Code of Federal Regulations
    (CFR) §1910.106, Flammable Liquids, which used to be titled “Flammable and Combustible Liquids.”

    Another significant change is the replacement of the term material safety data sheet (MSDS) with safety data
    sheet (SDS). MSDS is used in the course textbook, but all other course documents, including the lessons,
    assessments, and assignments will refer only to SDS.

    The 2012 HazCom revision was implemented in phases. Employee training on the new labels and SDS
    format was to be completed by December 1, 2013. Full compliance with new labeling requirements by June 1,

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Introduction to the Laws, Regulations, and
    Standards That Apply to Hazardous
    Materials Management

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    2015, was required for chemical manufacturers and importers. Compliance with all provisions of the revised
    standard, including replacement of alternate labeling systems, was required by June 1, 2016 (OSHA, 2013a).

    Although some of the information in Chapter 3 is based on the OSHA HazCom Standard prior to 2012, it still
    contains a significant amount of best practice information. For specific OSHA compliance requirements,
    accessing the standard through the OSHA website is recommended. If you want to use a printed version of
    the OSHA standards, be sure it was published after March 2012. OSHA has a webpage showing a side-by-
    side comparison of the 1994 and 2012 HazCom Standards that you can use to determine what has or has
    not changed.

    Hazardous Materials in the Workplace

    Workers have a right to know what chemicals are used in their workplaces, what risks these chemical hazards
    present, and how to protect themselves against the hazards. These are the values that form the foundation of
    OSHA’s HazCom Standard (Haight, 2012). While these principles of worker protection may appear self-
    evident, it was not until 1983 that they became codified in an OSHA standard. After more than 30 years,
    violations of the HazCom Standard are still among the most frequent citations issued by OSHA and among
    the top 10 in highest penalties assessed (Haight, 2012; OSHA, n.d.).

    In this unit, we review the regulations that govern the rights to know issues and examine the complexities
    involved with the effective implementation of the rules. Along the way, we may gain some insight into why
    there are so many violations and fines involved.

    OSHA (1998) estimates that there are 32 million workers exposed daily to one or more of the 650,000
    chemicals and chemical products in use today. In addition, new chemicals are continually being developed
    and introduced into the workplace. While some
    of these chemicals, such as ammonia, are easy
    to detect and the effects of exposure are
    obvious, many other chemicals, such as lead,
    cause no immediate worker distress upon
    exposure but can result in serious chronic
    illness, even at low-level exposure. The
    HazCom Standard is designed to provide a
    methodology to ensure that workers are not
    adversely affected by hazardous substances in
    the workplace.

    Effective control of hazardous materials in the
    workplace starts with chemical manufacturers
    and importers. The HazCom Standard requires
    them to analyze their chemicals and chemical
    compounds for hazards. They must then compile information about the hazards and provide this information
    to their employees and to anyone who buys or uses the substances. Employers who distribute, buy, or use
    the substances must pass the safety information on to their employees, and all employees must comply with
    the requirements for safe storage, handling, and use. It is a simple concept, but it is difficult to implement, as
    indicated by the number of violations documented annually.

    Haight (2012) suggests that employers complete five tasks to ensure effective implementation.

    • Develop a written HazCom program.
    • Create an up-to-date hazardous chemical inventory.
    • Have all hazardous materials properly labeled.
    • Make accessible to all employees an SDS for every chemical that is covered by the standard.
    • Properly instruct, train, and provide required information to all affected employees.

    OSHA (2014) recommends following the seven steps in order to implement an effective HazCom program.

    • Learn the standard, and identify responsible staff.
    • Prepare and implement a written HazCom program.

    HazCom wallet card
    (OSHA, 2013b)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    [https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html](https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/side-by-side.html)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Ensure containers are labeled.
    • Maintain SDSs.
    • Inform and train employees.
    • Evaluate and reassess your program.

    While the lists are similar, it should be noted that OSHA starts with learning the standard. Haight (2012)
    implies that learning the standard is a part of developing the written program. Similarly, Haight (2012) includes
    creating a hazardous material inventory as a separate task, while OSHA embeds the inventory in the written
    program step. Perhaps the most significant difference in the two approaches is OSHA’s inclusion of
    evaluating and reassessing the program as the final step. Evaluating the program means measuring
    compliance with the requirements of the OSHA standard as well as the effectiveness of the program. Program
    updates are needed if new chemicals are introduced into the workplace or if processes are changed.
    Inspections should be conducted to ensure labels on containers are intact and SDSs are kept current.

    Written HazCom Programs

    Many of the OSHA standards contain a requirement for a written program. In addition to the HazCom
    Standard, written programs are required in the OSHA standards for respiratory protection, hearing
    conservation, confined space entry, and others. Written programs ensure systematic development of
    compliance measures and ensure all elements are adequately addressed (OSHA, 2014). A cornerstone of the
    written program for HazCom is the hazardous materials inventory. Developing a comprehensive inventory
    may seem like an insurmountable task, but keep in mind that chemical manufacturers and importers are the
    ones required to prepare and provide SDSs. If your organization is not a chemical manufacturer or importer,
    then you should have already received an SDS for every hazardous chemical you purchased. This is a good
    place to start. If you do not have an SDS for a chemical, you can refer to the product label, which must
    include the name and address of the manufacturer from whom you can request the SDS. In some cases, a
    process may result in the creation of a hazardous substance. Since there is no manufacturer or importer, it is
    incumbent on the employer to develop or hire someone to develop the required SDS. The Appendix A: Health
    Hazard Criteria webpage and the Appendix B: Physical Criteria webpage provide guidelines for evaluating the
    health and physical hazards of substances but require significant expertise to be used effectively. Remember
    that if your organization, for whatever reason, develops its own SDS, it is responsible and liable for the
    accuracy of the information.

    The written program must also include procedures to ensure the hazardous materials inventory is kept
    current; new chemicals must be identified and added as they arrive, and chemicals no longer used must be
    deleted. An accurate, current inventory provides the basis for most of the other requirements of the standard.

    The good news is that there are numerous resources available to help you develop a written HazCom
    program. Free materials are available from OSHA and many state occupational safety and health offices. The
    HazCom Standard has also spawned a cottage industry of consultants who will be happy to help you for a
    price. Try entering "OSHA HazCom Standard" into your favorite internet search engine. The course textbook
    also offers a sample written program. When using any third-party resources, be sure they are based on the
    2012 changes to the HazCom Standard.

    The next unit will cover the regulations that apply to hazardous wastes. Subsequent units will provide
    information about control methods, hazardous spill response, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
    requirements for the transport of hazardous materials and wastes, and the benchmarking of programs.

    References

    Haight, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Hazardous material management and hazard communication. American Society of

    Safety Engineers.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Top 10 most frequently cited standards for fiscal year

    2018 (Oct. 1, 2017, to Sept. 30, 2018). United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Top_Ten_Standards.html

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppA)

    [https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB](https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200AppB)

    OSH 2303, Hazardous Materials Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1998). Chemical hazard communication (OSHA Document
    No. 3084). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3084.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013a). Foundation of workplace chemical safety programs:

    The globally harmonized system for hazard communication. United States Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2013b). Hazard communication OSHA 3658 [Image].

    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3658.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2014). Steps to an effective hazard communication program

    for employers that use hazardous chemicals [Fact sheet]. U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3696.pdf

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Read about the United Nations Global Harmonization System, which was the basis for the 2012 revisions to
    the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard.

    United Nations. (2011). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) (4th

    Rev. ed.). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
    http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    State Requirements
    If your state has a state plan approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    research the hazard communication (HazCom) requirements of the plan, and compare and contrast them with
    the OSHA HazCom Standard. If your state does not have its own plan, research the HazCom requirements
    for California. Do you have any recommendations for improvements to your state’s or California’s plan? Note
    your thoughts in a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?
    Review the written HazCom program for your current organization. Does it contain all of the required
    information? If it does not, explain what is missing. Would you recommend any changes to the existing
    content of the program? What improvements can you recommend? Explain your ideas. Note your thoughts in
    a personal journal that you can refer back to throughout the course.

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    [http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html](http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/04files_e.html)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – Global Harmonization
    – Hazardous Materials in the Workplace
    – Written HazCom Programs
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)
    – State Requirements
    – Is Hazard Communication Up to Par?