Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## Journal2instr.docx
**## Journal2instr.docx**
Journal Entry #2
Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.
This week, you will write a Journal Entry reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.
**Journal Entry (2–3 pages):**
Based on your experience,
· Describe an interesting case or a case that you have never seen before.
· Explain what you found challenging.
· Explain what you would do differently from your Preceptor.
· Explain the cultural differences you found challenging.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936769)
By Day 7
**Complete** your Journal Entry #2 Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK5Journal2+last name+first initial.**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br> <br>**49 to >39.0 ptsGood** Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**39 to >30.0 ptsFair** Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**30 to >0 ptsPoor** Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br> <br>**29 to >19.0 ptsGood** Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**19 to >9.0 ptsFair** Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsPoor** Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br> <br>**14 to >10.0 ptsGood** Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No APA errors<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains 1-2 APA errors<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains 3-5 APA errors<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains > 5 APA errors | 5 pts |
**## Journal2instr.docx**
Journal Entry #2
Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.
This week, you will write a Journal Entry reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.
**Journal Entry (2–3 pages):**
Based on your experience,
· Describe an interesting case or a case that you have never seen before.
· Explain what you found challenging.
· Explain what you would do differently from your Preceptor.
· Explain the cultural differences you found challenging.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936769)
By Day 7
**Complete** your Journal Entry #2 Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK5Journal2+last name+first initial.**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br> <br>**49 to >39.0 ptsGood** Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**39 to >30.0 ptsFair** Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**30 to >0 ptsPoor** Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br> <br>**29 to >19.0 ptsGood** Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**19 to >9.0 ptsFair** Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsPoor** Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br> <br>**14 to >10.0 ptsGood** Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No APA errors<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains 1-2 APA errors<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains 3-5 APA errors<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains > 5 APA errors | 5 pts |