Category: Nursing

  • NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    Syllabus

    Course Code: NR511

    Course Title: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

    Top Information

     Course Number: NR511

     Course Title: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

     Course Credit: 3 (Theory 0.5; Clinical 2.5)

     Pre-requisite: NR508, NR509

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

    Course Text

    Textbook 1

     Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary

    care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

    Textbook 2

     Ferri, F. F. (2014). Ferri’s clinical advisor 2014: 5 books in 1. Philadelphia: Mosby

    Elsevier. (Ebook)

    Textbook 3

     Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com.(Ebook)

    Required across all FNP courses:

    Textbook 4

     American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American

    Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    NR511 Syllabus

    Course Description

    This course will provide students with content regarding formulating differential diagnoses of

    individuals within the primary care setting, along with an introduction to critical diagnostic skills

    to cultivate evidence-based behaviors. An emphasis will be placed on processing client

    information in a logical, progressive manner and formulating differential diagnoses for

    individuals across the lifespan. The course will include 125 hours of supervised clinical

    practicum in primary care.

    Course
    Outcomes

    1.
    Demonstrate diagnostic reasoning that will assist in health promotion and illness

    management of common health problems in primary care through case study

    presentation. (PO 1)

    2. Plan for healthcare delivery in an evidence-based manner to support high-quality and

    cost-effective care and decision-making. (PO 1, 9, 11)

    3. Formulate differential diagnoses based on the subjective and objective patient data

    obtained from the case study. (PO 1, 3)

    4. Create weekly S-O-A-P documentation on a clinical patient, demonstrating increased

    mastery each week. (PO 1, 3). NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    5. Create a plan of care which integrates pharmacological, complementary, and nonpharmacological

    therapies for management of common health problems. (PO 1)

    6. Utilize established standards and guidelines for management of common pediatric,

    gynecology, internal medicine, and behavioral conditions in primary care. (1, 11)

    7. Engage in sequential application of selected advanced skills/procedures. (PO 1)

    8. Demonstrate advanced skills/procedures for quality outcomes pertinent to patient

    care. (PO 1, 2)

    9. Perform selected advanced skills/procedures appropriate to student competence and

    provider scope of practice. (1)

    10. Conduct a systematic and accurate assessment of a client’s total health status,

    utilizing appropriate interviewing and data collection techniques. (PO 1, 2, 5, 11)

    11. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a

    family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 7)

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    Program Outcomes

    The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing

    publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN

    degree program, the graduate will be able to:

    1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from

    nursing and related disciplines.

    2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced

    nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet

    healthcare needs.

    5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional

    values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.

    6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.

    7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific

    evidence.

    8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and

    organizational goals.

    9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced

    nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.

    10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership

    to improve population health outcomes.

    11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective

    decision making.

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    Course Schedule

    Week 1

    Title: Primary Care in the 21st Century,

    Caring and the Advanced Practice

    Nurse, and the Art of Diagnosis and

    Treatment

    COs: 3, 6, 8

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 1: Primary Care in the

    Twenty-First Century: A Circle

    of Caring

     Chapter 4: The Art of

    Diagnosis and Treatment

     Chapter 8: Eyes, Ears, Nose,

    and Throat Problems

    Assignments: Attestation Statement Completion

    (required to begin course)

    Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with

    SOAP note (required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Week 2

    Title: Evidence Based Practice,

    Neurological Problems, and Eyes,

    Ears, Nose, and Throat Problems

    COs: 4, 6, 9, 10

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 5: Evidence-Based

    Care

     Chapter 6: Neurologic

    Problems

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with

    SOAP note (required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

     Other

    Week 3

    Title: Health Promotion, Skin Problems, and

    Respiratory Problems

    COs: 4, 5, 7, 8, 9

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 3: Health Promotion

     Chapter 7: Skin Problems

     Chapter 9: Respiratory

    Problems

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with

    SOAP note(required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Week 4

    Title: Diagnostic Testing, Cardiovascular

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Problems, Abdominal Problems,

    Renal Problems

    COs: 2, 5, 7, 8, 9

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 10: Cardiovascular

    Problems

     Chapter 11: Abdominal

    Problems

     Chapter 12: Renal Problems

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with

    SOAP note (required, but not graded)

    Quiz (required but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Week 5

    Title: Men’s Health Problems, Women’s

    Health Problems, Musculoskeletal

    Problems

    COs: 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 13: Men’s Health

    Problems

     Chapter 14: Women’s Health

    Problems

     Chapter 15: Musculoskeletal

    Problems

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs

    (required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Week 6

    Title: Complex Diagnosis, Endocrine and

    Metabolic Problems, Hematologic and

    Immune Problems, and Emergency

    Problems

    COs: 2, 5, 7, 8, 9

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 16: Endocrine and

    Metabolic Problems

     Chapter 17: Hematologic and

    Immune Problems

     Chapter 19: Emergency

    Problems

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs

    (required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Week 7

    Title: Laboratory tests, Psychological

    Problems, Palliative Care and

    Practical Psychotherapy

    COs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 18: Psychosocial

    Problems

     Chapter 20: Palliative Care

     Chapter 23: The 15-Minute

    Hour: A Short-Term Approach

    to Psychotherapy in Primary

    Care

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs

    (required, but not graded)

    Case Study

    Discussions

    Yes

    Other

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Week 8

    Title: Ethical and Legal Issues, the Business

    of Advanced Practice, Putting Caring

    into Practice: Caring for Self

    COs: 11

    Reading: Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E.,

    Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015).

    Primary care: The art and science of

    advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).

    Retrieved from

    http://online.vitalsource.com

     Chapter 21: Ethical and Legal

    Issues of a Caring-Based

    Practice

     Chapter 22: The Business of

    Advanced Practice

     Chapter 24: Putting Caring Into

    Practice: Caring for Self

    Assignments: Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs &

    Clinical Performance Evaluation

    (graded)

    Quiz (required but not graded)

    Reflection (graded)

    Reflection Yes

    Other

    Late Assignment Policy

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted

    after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that

    assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as

    described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the

    assignment.

    In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may

    petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will

    review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of

    the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a

    contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively

    participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

    This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course

    letter grade.

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Evaluation Methods

    Assignment Points Weighting

    Case Study Discussions

    (100 points, Weeks 1–7)

    700 70%

    Reflection

    (due Week 8)

    50 5%

    Quiz

    (required, but not graded due

    Week 4 & 8)

    N/A N/A

    Clinical Encounter Log

    (due Weeks 1–8)

    Clinical Performance Evaluation

    (Week 8)

    Final clinical performance

    evaluation pass and/or

    documentation of 125 hours =

    250 points

    Fail or unsatisfactory on clinical

    performance evaluation and/or

    less than 125 hours

    documented =0 points

    250 25%

    Total Points 1,000 100%

    A passing grade, or S, must be achieved on the clinical performance evaluation. If this is

    achieved and the 125 clinical hours are documented, the 250 points will be added to the

    remainder of the course points to calculate the final course grade. If the student does not

    achieve a passing grade (fail) for the clinical performance evaluation, then the final

    course grade assigned will be F.

    No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

    All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are

    converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass

    the course.

    LETTER

    GRADE POINTS PERCENTAGE

    A 940–1,000 94–100%

    A- 920–939 92–93%

    B+ 890–919 89–91%

    B 860–889 86–88%

    B- 840–859 84–85%

    C+ 810–839 81–83%

    C 760–809 76–80%

    F 759 and below 75% and below

    Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for

    textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will

    be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose

    of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms

    and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

    Participation Guidelines

    The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to

    participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part

    two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, provide a written summary in SOAP format to the Dropbox by

    Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue

    criterion). The student must provide answers to the graded case study questions from part one,

    post a treatment plan for part two and provide a written summation of their case in SOAP format

    to the Dropbox for part three. NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    Grading Rubric

    Criteria

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or

    highest level of

    performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or

    high level of

    performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Needs

    Improvements

    Poor or

    failing level of

    performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Total Points

    Possible=

    100

    24 Points 21 Points 19 Points 9 Points 0 Points

    Application

    of Course

    Knowledge

    Post contributes

    unique

    perspectives or

    Post

    contributes

    unique

    Post has

    limited

    perspective,

    Post

    perspectives

    are not

    Post offers no

    insight or

    application to

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Criteria

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or

    highest level of

    performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or

    high level of

    performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Needs

    Improvements

    Poor or

    failing level of

    performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory

    level of

    performance

    insights

    applicable to the

    results from the

    physical exam

    differential

    diagnoses.

    Part One: Initial

    post includes at

    least three (3)

    differential

    diagnoses with

    rationale for

    each problembased

    learning

    case study

    patient and

    answers all

    questions

    presented in the

    case.

    Parts Two and

    Three:

    Presumptive

    diagnosis and

    treatment plan

    are appropriate

    and evidence

    based for each

    case study

    patient.

    perspectives

    or insights,

    but may lack

    some

    applicability to

    presented

    case study

    patients.

    Part One:

    Initial post

    includes at

    least two (2)

    differential

    diagnoses

    with rationale

    for each

    problembased

    learning case

    study patient

    and answers

    most of the

    questions

    presented in

    the case.

    Parts Two

    and Three:

    Confirmed

    diagnosis and

    treatment plan

    partially

    applicable

    and evidence

    based for

    each case

    study patient.

    insights

    and/or

    applicability to

    presented

    case study

    patients.

    Part One:

    Initial post

    does not

    address each

    patient or

    does not

    include at

    least two (2)

    differential

    diagnoses for

    each patient.

    Some

    evidencebased

    rationale may

    be missing.

    Does not

    answer

    questions

    presented in

    the case.

    Parts Two and

    Three:

    Confirmed

    diagnosis and

    treatment plan

    are not

    applicable or

    may not be

    evidencebased.

    consistent with

    current

    practice.

    the case study

    presentation

    24 Points 21 Points 19 Points 9 Points 0 Points

    Support from

    EvidenceBased

    Initial discussion

    posts in parts

    one, two and

    Initial

    discussion

    posts for parts

    Initial

    discussion

    posts for parts

    Citations to

    non-scholarly

    websites given

    Discussion

    posts contain

    no evidence-

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Criteria

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or

    highest level of

    performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or

    high level of

    performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Needs

    Improvements

    Poor or

    failing level of

    performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Practice

    (EBP)

    SOAP note are

    supported by

    evidence from

    appropriate

    sources

    published within

    the last 5 years.

    In-text citations

    and full

    references are

    provided

    one, two, and

    SOAP note

    are partially

    supported by

    evidence from

    appropriate

    sources

    published

    within the last

    5 years.

    In-text

    citations and

    full references

    are provided.

    Evidencebased,

    peer

    reviewed

    journal article

    cited but may

    not fully

    support the

    treatment

    plan.

    one, two, and

    SOAP note

    are partially

    supported by

    evidence.

    Sources may

    not be

    scholarly in

    nature or may

    be older than

    5 years.

    In-text

    citations

    and/or full

    references

    may be

    incomplete or

    missing.

    as rationale to

    support

    differential

    diagnoses

    and/or

    treatment plan.

    based practice

    reference or

    citation.

    24 Points 21 Points 19 Points 9 Points 0 Points

    Organization

    Discussion

    posts and

    SOAP notes

    presents case

    study findings in

    a logical,

    meaningful, and

    understandable

    sequence. Each

    problem-based

    learning case

    study patient is

    presented

    individually in all

    discussion

    posts and

    SOAP notes.

    Part One:

    Discussion

    posts and

    SOAP notes

    are relevant to

    the topic but

    may be

    unclear or

    difficult to

    follow in

    places.

    Part One:

    Discussion

    questions

    may not be

    addressed

    individually for

    each patient.

    SOAP note

    Discussion

    posts and

    SOAP notes

    not fully

    relevant to the

    topic. May be

    unclear or

    difficult to

    follow in

    places.

    SOAP note

    does not

    contain all

    components

    and/or may be

    missing data.

    Discussion post

    presents case

    findings and

    plan or

    intervention

    that are

    sometimes

    unclear to

    follow and may

    not always be

    relevant to topic

    Discussion post

    is not relevant

    to case study.

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Criteria

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or

    highest level of

    performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or

    high level of

    performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Needs

    Improvements

    Poor or

    failing level of

    performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Discussion

    questions

    addressed

    individually for

    each patient.

    contains all

    elements but

    may not be

    written

    following

    SOAP note

    format.

    24 Points 21 Points 19 Points 9 Points 0 Points

    Interactive

    Dialogue

    Presents case

    study findings

    and responds

    substantively to

    at least one

    topic-related

    post of a peer

    including

    evidence from

    appropriate

    sources, and all

    direct faculty

    questions

    posted in parts

    one and two.

    Presents case

    study findings

    and responds

    substantively

    to at least one

    topic-related

    post of a peer.

    Does not

    include

    evidence from

    appropriate

    sources.

    Responds to

    some direct

    faculty

    questions

    posted in

    parts one and

    two.

    Responds to a

    student peer

    and/or faculty

    questions but

    the posts add

    limited content

    or insights to

    the

    discussion.

    Responds to a

    student peer

    and/or faculty,

    but the nature

    of the response

    is not

    substantive.

    Does not

    respond to a

    topic-related

    peer post

    and/or does not

    respond to

    faculty

    questions

    posted by

    Sunday.

    4 Points 3 Points 2 Points

    1 Point

    0 Points

    Grammar,

    Syntax, APA

    APA format,

    grammar,

    spelling, and/or

    punctuation are

    accurate, or

    with zero to one

    errors.

    Two to four

    errors in APA

    format,

    grammar,

    spelling, and

    syntax noted.

    Five to seven

    errors in APA

    format,

    grammar,

    spelling, and

    syntax noted.

    Eight to nine

    errors in APA

    format,

    grammar,

    spelling, and

    syntax noted.

    Post contains

    greater than ten

    errors in APA

    format,

    grammar,

    spelling, and/or

    punctuation or

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Criteria

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or

    highest level of

    performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or

    high level of

    performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory

    level of

    performance

    Needs

    Improvements

    Poor or

    failing level of

    performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory

    level of

    performance

    repeatedly

    makes the

    same errors

    after faculty

    feedback.

    0 Points

    Deducted

    -10 Points per

    Discussion

    Part

    Participation

    Enters first

    post to part

    one by 11:59

    p.m. MT on

    Tuesday;

    First post to

    part two by

    11:59 p.m. MT

    on Thursday;

    and submits

    written

    summation

    by Sunday

    11:59 p.m.

    MT. Written

    submission

    (SOAP notes)

    will NOT be

    accepted

    after Sunday

    11:59 p.m.

    MT.

    * 10 points

    deducted per

    discussion

    part if this

    criteria is not

    met.

    Enters first post

    to part one by

    11:59 p.m. MT

    on Tuesday;

    first post to part

    two by 11:59

    p.m. MT on

    Thursday; and

    submits written

    summation by

    Sunday 11:59

    p.m. MT.

    10 points

    deducted per

    discussion part

    if this criteria is

    not met.

    Written

    submission will

    not be accepted

    after Sunday

    11:59 p.m. MT.

    33 points

    deducted for

    missing SOAP

    note.

    Retrieved on 1/16

    Webliography Disclaimer

    The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world

    wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what

    is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous

    or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these

    websites for course assignments and references. NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

    Professional Portfolio

    Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a

    Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final

    portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the

    learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

     Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses

     Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)

     eLogs portfolio

     Curriculum vitae

     Professional development plan paper from NR510

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Essay Assignment Papers

  • Health care market organizations – Benchmarking in financial decision making

    Health care market organizations – Benchmarking in financial decision making

    In order to be competitive in health care markets, organizations must ensure that the services they provide are consistent in pricing and quality with other comparable organizations. In this Discussion, you will examine how the process of benchmarking, or comparing organizations, is important in financial decision making.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    To prepare:

    Review the information on benchmarking found in this week’s Learning Resources.

    Search the Walden Library or other reliable resources on the Internet and locate a journal article discussing how a health care organization has used the principle of benchmarking.

    How could the concept of benchmarking be used in your own organization (or one with which you are familiar), regardless of size?

    Consider how benchmarking could be useful to you in decision making.

    Analyze the potential risks of making a faulty comparison.

    By Day 3

    Post
     a summary of the article you found (including the APA reference) and explain how it informed your understanding of benchmarking. Discuss how benchmarking could be used for financial decision making in your own organization (or one with which you are familiar). Also analyze the potential risks of making comparisons with an organization that is not a credible match with your own.

    Health care market organizations – Benchmarking in financial decision making

  • NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

    NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

    Week 3: Discussion Part One

    No unread replies.No replies.

    Date of visit: October 20, 2017

    A 25 year old male freshman college student presents to the student health center today with complaints of bilateral eye discomfort. Upon further questioning you discover the following subjective information regarding the chief complaint.

    History of Present Illness

    Onset

    2-3 days ago

    Location

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

    Both eyes

    Duration

    Constant

    Characteristics

    Both eyes feel “gritty” with mild to moderate amount of discomfort. Further describes the gritty sensation “like sand caught in your eye”

    Aggravating factors

    None identified

    Relieving factors

    None identified

    Treatments

    Tried OTC visine drops yesterday which temporarily improved the redness but the gritty sensation, tearing and itching remained.

    Severity

    Level of discomfort is 2/10 on pain scale

    Review of Systems (ROS)

    Constitutional

    Denies fever, chills, or recent illnesses

    Eyes

    Denies contact lenses or glasses, has never experienced these symptoms previously. Last eye exam was “a few years ago”. Denies recent trauma or eye injury. Denies crusting of lids or mucoid or purulent drainage. Bilateral symptoms of +redness, +itching, +tearing + FB sensation.

    Ears

    -otalgia, -otorrhea

    Nose

    +occasional runny nose with intermittent nasal congestion, denies sneezing. History of seasonal nasal allergies which is aggravated in the spring but is well controlled on loratadine and fluticasone nasal spray taken during peak season.

    Throat

    Denies ST and redness

    Neck

    Denies lymph node tenderness or swelling

    Chest

    Denies cough, SOB and wheezing

    Heart

    Denies chest pain

    History

    Medications

    Loratadine 10mg daily (only takes during the spring months when nasal allergies flare)

    PMH

    Seasonal allergic rhinitis with springtime triggers

    PSH

    None

    Allergies

    None

    Social

    Freshman student at the University of Awesome located in central Illinois. Home is in Phoenix.

    Habits

    Denies cigarettes +recreational marijuana use +drinks 3-6 beers per weekend

    FH

    Adopted, does not know biological parents history

    Physical exam reveals the following.

    Physical Exam

    Constitutional

    Young adult male in NAD, alert and oriented, cooperative

    VS

    Temp-97.9, P-68, R-16, BP 120/75, Height 6’0, Weight 195 pounds

    Head

    Normocephalic

    Eyes

    Visual Acuity 20/20 (uncorrected) OU. PERRL with white sclera bilaterally. + photosensitivity. No crusting, lesions or masses on lids noted. Bilateral conjunctiva with diffuse redness and tearing but no mucoid or purulent drainage noted. No visible FBs under lids or on cornea to gross examination. NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

    Fundiscopic examination: Discs flat with sharp margins. Vessels present in all quadrants without crossing defects. Retinal background has even color, no hemorrhages noted. Macula has even color.

    Ears

    Tympanic membranes gray and intact with light reflex noted. Pinna and tragus nontender.

    Nose

    Nares patent. Nasal turbinates are pale and boggy with mild to moderate swelling. Nasal drainage is clear.

    Throat

    Oropharynx moist, no lesions or exudate. Tonsils ¼ bilaterally. Teeth in good repair, no cavities noted.

    Neck

    Neck supple. No lymphadenopathy. Thyroid midline, small and firm without palpable masses.

    Cardiopulmonary

    Heart S1 and S2 noted, no murmurs, noted. Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally. Respirations unlabored.

    · Briefly and concisely summarize the history and physical (H&P) findings as if you were presenting it to your preceptor using the pertinent facts from the case. Use shorthand where possible and approved medical abbreviations. Avoid redundancy and irrelevant information.

    · Provide a differential diagnosis (minimum of 3) which might explain the patient’s chief complaint along with a brief statement of pathophysiology for each. NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

    · Analyze the differential by using the pertinent findings from the history and physical to argue for or against a diagnosis. Rank the differential in order of most likely to least likely.

    · Identify any additional tests and/or procedures that you feel is necessary or needed to help you narrow your differential. IF you ordered a test or performed a procedure, identify the corresponding Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code(s). If not applicable, list n/a. All testing decisions must be supported with an evidence-based medicine (EBM) argument as to why it is necessary or pertinent in this case. If no testing is indicated or needed, you must also support this decision with EBM evidence. NR511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care

  • Potential barriers to Evidence Based Practice (EBP) project – Early mobility in the ICU

    Give a positive comment on the following Potential barriers to Evidence Based Practice (EBP) project – Early mobility in the ICU;

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER

    Potential barriers to my EBP project continuing desired results include resistance from staff and waning commitment from staff (Pexton, n.d.). Early mobility of ICU patients involves a lot of work from nurses such as additional assessment and physical demands of mobilizing patients, so I could see how after the initial push the results may decrease. To overcome this, education could be ongoing along with encouragement of staff to express their concerns. Allowing staff to communicate regarding the implementation may bring up points that were not thought of or planned out, leading to improved processes. Waning commitment is another barrier that may reduce the desired outcome of early mobility in the ICU. Many nurses, including myself, feel that we are always given more tasks and asked to do more with less. This may lead to reduced compliance as the program continues. This barrier may be overcome by implementing a communication plan that reaches all ICU staff members and focuses on the positives and “wins” of the project (Pexton, n.d.). Positive feedback from me regarding increased positive patient outcomes due to early mobility would keep the staff motivated and hopefully continue the desired results.  For EBP practices to continue, management also needs to facilitate a culture of improvement and support. Managers and leaders can do this by supporting communication, encouraging staff participations, and establishing priorities (HCPro, 2008). Through education, communication, and management support my EBP project of early mobility of ICU patients could show continued positive results.

    References

    HCPro. (2008). Nurse managers’ role in evidence-based practice. Retrieved from HCPro:

    http://www.hcpro.com/NRS-208146-3238/Nurse-managers-role-in-evidencebased-practice.html

    Pexton, C. (n.d.). Overcoming the barriers to change in healthcare system. Retrieved from Six sigma:

    Overcoming the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System

    Potential barriers to Evidence Based Practice (EBP) project – Early mobility in the ICU

  • NUR 508 Ethics, Policy, And Finance In The Health Care System Essay Assignment Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 508 Ethics, Policy, And Finance In The Health Care System Essay Assignment Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 508 Resource 1: CLC Health Issue Analysis Overview

    NUR 508 Week 2 Assignment (Benchmark): Nursing Leadership Health Policy Paper

    NUR-508 Week 2 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Topic Identification

    NUR 508 Week 3 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part I

    NUR-508 Week 4 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part II

    NUR 508 Week 5 Assignment 1 (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part III

    NUR-508 Week 5 Assignment 2: Cost and Quality Analysis

    NUR 508 Week 6 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part IV

    NUR 508 Week 7 Assignment 1: Health Policy Values

    NUR-508 Week 7 Assignment 2 (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part V

    NUR 508 Week 8 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part VI

    NUR 508 Ethics, Policy, And Finance In The Health Care System Essay Assignment Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR-508 Week 1 Discussion Question 1

    What were the major causes of U.S. mortality in the last 100 years, and what public health measures most contributed to improvements in the health of the nation? Include at least two source citations from the readings and/or additional sources to support your answer.

    NUR 508 Week 1 Discussion Question 2

    What are the major causes of disease and death in the 21st century (e.g., chronic illnesses, communicable diseases, etc.) that continue to affect U.S. citizens in spite of the achievements in public health in the past century? What have been some of the strategies implemented to combat these illnesses on the local and national levels? Have they been successful? Include reference citations where appropriate.

    NUR-508 Week 2 Discussion Question 1

    Select one of the United Nations’ (U.N.) Millennial Development Goals (MDGs). Visit the website and report on the UN’s progress in achieving this goal? How will meeting this goal positively impact the health of the world? What suggestions would you make to help the UN achieve this goal?

    NUR 508 Week 2 Discussion Question 2

    Select a global health issue from the World Health Organization (WHO) list of health topics available at http://www.who.int/topics/en/ How has globalization influenced this issue from a positive or negative perspective?

    NUR-508 Week 3 Discussion Question 1

    Debate the various social factors associated with the situation of the “underinsured.” Respond to two other classmates’ answers with solid reasoning and support your opinions with appropriate reference citations.

    NUR 508 Week 3 Discussion Question 2

    Review the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) report “Priority Populations”:

    http://www.ahrq.gov/health-care-information/priority-populations/index.html

    Select one of the “priority populations” and explain the disparities this population faces. What strategies have been implemented to combat these disparities on the local and national levels? Have they been successful? Include reference citations where appropriate.

    NUR-508 Week 4 Discussion Question 1

    Debate the efficacies of public versus private-based quality initiatives. What roles do each play in the quality of U.S. health care? How would the elimination of one aspect affect the other? Respond to two other classmates and counter their answer, citing references as appropriate.

    NUR 508 Week 4 Discussion Question 2

    After reading the Kaiser Family Foundation summary on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, state why or why not you believe the act should remain in law, or which pieces should be reversed. Then describe two pieces of the act that you were unaware was part of the act and how that may affect you as a citizen.

    NUR-508 Week 5 Discussion Question 1

    What are the eligibility requirements and coverage of Medicaid for the categories of low-income adults, pregnant women, and the aging/blind/disabled in the state where you live? Do you consider the eligibility requirements reasonable or restrictive? Do you consider the coverage reasonable or liberal? What are the benefits and drawbacks to keeping these populations insured through Medicaid? Consider both direct and indirect factors.

    NUR 508 Week 5 Discussion Question 2

    Review the CMS.gov 30-Day Mortality and Readmission Data website. Review at least two local hospitals and see how they compare to state and national benchmarks. How and why may a consumer or a health care professional use this data to make decision about their next hospitalization? Will reporting this data have an impact on hospitals bottom line in addition to financial penalties from CMS? Give at least two examples of how this data may be used and what type of impact if may have if at all on the hospitals.

    NUR-508 Week 6 Discussion Question 1

    Debate the question: “Is health care a basic right in the United States?” Answer this question through the lens of your role as RN. Support your response utilizing ethical theories and principles. Respond to two other classmates using respectful communication and solid reasoning. Support your response with appropriate references.

    NUR 508 Week 6 Discussion Question 2

    Select an ethical dilemma related to health policy from the categories of moral values, professional regulation, health of individuals in society, or distributive justice. What are the controversies surrounding this issue? What are the opposing ethical principles? How has past or current health policy addressed this dilemma? Support your reasoning with reference citations.

    NUR-508 Week 7 Discussion Question 1

    How do spiritual beliefs impact political ideologies and the policy process? How have they affected the health policy reform process? Using respectful communication, debate your response with two other classmates. Give examples and support your reasoning with appropriate references.

    NUR 508 Week 7 Discussion Question 2

    What is the role of a religious ethic in public policy today? Should a religious ethic or theistic worldview take priority over that of others? How can religious policy decision makers remain true to their personal values while respecting the views of individuals with differing cultural and spiritual beliefs? Respond to two other classmates and cite references as appropriate.

    NUR-508 Week 8 Discussion Question 1

    Select an advanced professional or advanced practice nursing specialty. How has past and current regulation/legislation affected the role and scope of this nursing role? What, if any, discussions are currently underway relative to the scope and role of this specialty? What resources are available to assist nurses in advocating for these roles?

    NUR 508 Week 8 Discussion Question 2

    Select a professional or specialty nursing association. What impact has this organization had on health care legislation in the past 2 years? Respond to two other classmates and support your answer with appropriate references and specific examples.

    NUR 508 Ethics, Policy, And Finance In The Health Care System Essay Assignment Papers and Discussion Questions

     

    NUR 508 Resource 1: CLC Health Issue Analysis Overview

    NUR-508 Week 2 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Topic Identification

    NUR 508 Week 3 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part I

    NUR-508 Week 4 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part II

    NUR 508 Week 5 Assignment 1 (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part III

    NUR-508 Week 6 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part IV

    NUR 508 Week 7 Assignment 1: Health Policy Values

    NUR-508 Week 7 Assignment 2 (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part V

    NUR 508 Week 8 Assignment (CLC): Health Issue Analysis – Part VI

    NUR 508 Ethics, Policy, And Finance In The Health Care System Essay Assignment Papers and Discussion Questions

  • NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 504 Week 1 Discussion Question # 1:

    Discuss the differences between research, research utilization, and evidence-based practice. You may want to link this to the historical evolution of research in nursing.

    NUR 504 Week 1 Discussion Question # 2:

    Identify and discuss two major ways in which qualitative research differs from quantitative research. Is one better than the other? Provide reference(s).

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

    NUR 504 Week 2 Discussion Question # 1:

    Discuss sources of bias for both quantitative and qualitative research. For quantitative research, be sure to address both random and systematic bias. You may use examples from the articles you selected as illustrations of bias and/or preventing bias. NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 504 Week 2 Discussion Question # 2:

    Researchers often identify the research problem and then go in search of a theory. Discuss the disadvantages of doing this. What does the textbook recommend that researchers do to assure a true fit between theory and designing the study?

    NUR 504 Week 3 Discussion Question # 1:

    Describe the quantitative design of the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations of this type of design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in your study. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses.

    NUR 504 Week 3 Discussion Question # 2:

    Describe the qualitative design (or methodology) of the article you selected. ………. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses.

    NUR 504 Week 4 Discussion Question # 1:

    Read the section Questionnaires versus Interviews on pages 305-306 in the textbook. ………..? What principles did you identify that are new to you but could be important in improving your collection of clinical data?

    NUR 504 Week 4 Discussion Question # 2:

    You are interested in nurses’ attitudes toward EBP. Which method do you think would work best to obtain this information: a questionnaire, a face-to-face interview, or a group interview? Defend your answer.

    NUR 504 Week 5 Discussion Question # 1:

    Demographic data is collected for every study. What is the purpose of describing the demographic data?

    NUR 504 Week 5 Discussion Question # 2:

    There is a tendency for novice researchers to develop their own instrument if they cannot readily find one. How might you respond to a peer or manager who asks you to help develop a new tool to collect patient data on anxiety prior to cardiac catheterization?

    NUR 504 Week 6 Discussion Question # 1:

    State in your own words what is meant by Type I and Type II errors. Why are these important? ……….. improve internal validity of a study.

    NUR 504 Week 6 Discussion Question # 2:

    An example of a multivariate procedure is analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Explain what is meant by the following statement: ANCOVA offers post hoc statistical control. Provide an example

    NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion Question # 1:

    In the final section of study reports, there is a section on implications and recommendations. Describe the difference between these terms. Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.

    NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion Question # 2:

    Researchers have a responsibility to identify the limitations of a study. ……… by limitation? Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.

    NUR 504 Week 8 Discussion Question # 1

    Post your group’s CLC EBP project. Critically read two CLC EBP projects (other than your own). Name one barrier for each that could impact the implementation of the guideline in practice and how you would work through this issue.  NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 504 Week 8 Discussion Question # 2

    Discuss what …. meant by mixed-methods designs. What are the limitations of these designs.

    NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

    NUR 504 Week 1 Benchmark Assignment: Evidenced-Based Practice

    NUR-504 Week 2 Assignment: Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Version 1)

    NUR 504 Week 2 Assignment: Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Version 2)

    NUR-504 Week 2 Collaborative Learning Community (CLC): EBP Agreement

    NUR 504 Week 3 Assignment: Summarize Research Articles

    NUR-504 Week 4 Collaborative Learning Community (CLC): EBP Identification

    NUR 504 Week 4 Critique of Research Studies -Part 1

    NUR-504 Week 5 Collaborative Learning Community (EPB): EBP Literature

    NUR 504 Week 6 Assignment: Critique of Research Studies – Part 2

    NUR 504 Week 7 CLC Assignment: EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan

    NUR 504 Week 8 Assignment: Critique of Research Studies – Part 3

    NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

     

    NUR 504 Healthcare Research Analysis and Utilization Essay Papers and Discussion Questions

  • Professional Dynamics NRS-430V Essay Assignment Papers

    Professional Dynamics NRS-430V Essay Assignment Papers

    Discussion Questions
    Professional Dynamics NRS-430V- Prof
    . Lorilee McAfee

     T
    opic 1: Disc
    ussion Question 1

    Read Lake 
    and Von B
    aeyer#s article. “For Successful Students. $
    Also
    review the characteristics of a successful student and as explained in the 
    lecture. 
    As you consider these which is your strongest characteristic and why, How w
    ill this characteristic help you to become a successful student in your p
    rogram of study,

     The charact
    eristic in which I profoundly use to guide myself through my program of 
    study as expressed by the list provided in the “Tips for Successful Students is 
    responsible and active! These traits are 
    the seed that 
    have allowed me to 
    create a 
    successful path in 
    my program of 
    choice! “y ta#ing an 
    active role in my education 
    and holding myself responsible to my academic goals$ I am pursuing the future I
    want % outside of the academic community$ these traits have helped me to parta#
    e
    in a healthy lifestyle th
    at will not deter me from the main goals at hand! This 
    foundation have help me to not only ma#e it thus far in my studies$ but have allow 
    me to re&ect on the struggles I under too# to get to this point in my academic 
    career
    ! ‘s I continue to advance myself$ I continue to learn that these are not only 
    traits$ but are morals in which I have built my success on and will continue to follow
    throughout my life!
     T
    opic 1: Disc
    ussion Question (

    +’at do you 
    loo for&ard to as 
    you e*in t’is educational e()erience and
    your )ersonal searc’ for 
    )ur)ose, +’at is 
    your *reatest fear, 
    o& can
    you o!ercome it, +rite aout one 
    s)eci/c educational e()erience 
    from
    your )ast in &’ic’ you addressed a fear and o!ercame it and ‘o& you 
    succeeded in t’is process.

     The things 
    I loo# forwar
    d to as I embar# on this education experience is learning 
    new things about how the human body function$ and completing the requirements 
    for the “S* pr
    ogram! +y greatest fear is no
    t being able to complete my
    assignments by t
    he due date! It is very di,cult to go to school and wor# a full time
     -ob$ so I pla
    n to complete all my assignments 
    in a timely manner to overcome this
    fear! The feeling on uncertainty in mid semester of a 
    class that started out
    informative and interactive can create a great deal of stress in addition to other
    course wor#! During the fall of my fr
    eshman year my anatomy and physiology class 
    was one of my favorite classes until my professor shifted the direction in which he
    taught his class
    ! The .rst few wee#s he allow the students to be a part of his
    lecture with in class group activities and discussions that were directed to
    expanding upon the 
    material he was teaching! ‘s mid semester approached he
    slowly withdrew from group activities and limited the amount of in class discussion
    which served as my way to .r
    mly grasp the material that w
    as been taught! ‘s his
    incentive to teach died down I slowly started to fail his class% as a freshman I
    learned that as a student there will be times in which you will have to ta#e upon
    yourself play the r
    ole of your 
    professor and teach yourself the material! /hile some
    professors are actively engaged in their students learning$ some will slowly pull
    away providing room 
    for failure! 0veryone hate to fail$ b
    ut sometimes a terrible
    experience with a professor will open your eyes to the importance of selfmotivation
    and responsibility
    !
     T
    opic (: Disc
    ussion Question 1

    o& does no&led*e of t’e foundations and ‘istory of nursin* )ro!ide a
    conte(t in &’ic’ 
    to understand current )ractice, dentify at least 
    t’ree
    trends in nursin* )ractice from t’e $Nursin* 1imeline of istorical 2!ents
    media )iece. o& ‘a!e 
    t’ese trends inuenced your )ers)ecti!e on
    nursin* )ractice,

     The dominanc
    e of female pr
    esence in the nursing .eld directly r
    e&ect its history in
    terms of the r
    ole women play
    ! “efore nursing became a .eld of practice it started
    out as 
    women providing care 
    for the sic#! 2lorence *ightingale was highly praised
    for her wor# in the nursing .eld because she saw the need for improvement%
    speci.cally her push for reform of sanitation method practiced by the “ritish military
    heal care system was the introduction of change in the entire health care system!
    3er innovative implementation of change in the health care brought ma-or
    recognition that the 
    nursing .eld 
    deserve! This recognition allowed for even more
    growth in nursing practices allowing growth in education drastically improving
    patient outcomes! The willingn
    ess of women from the start of patient car
    e practice
    have allowed nursing to grow within the female population% this growth is not only
    re&ective of its past$ but goes to show that anyone can contribute to the movement
    of change! ‘s advancements in the 
    medical .eld continues to grow more 
    extensive
    three that have in&uenced my perspective of nursing is my nursing practice is the x
    ray machine$ ultras
    ound technology$ and the nursing uniform! The xray machine
    and ultrasound technolo
    gy have allowed a way for physicians with and inside loo# of 
    the human body and a 
    way to analy4e the normal and 
    abnormal structure! This
    analysis enable physicians to prescribe proper course of treatment when there is
    abnormal .nding$ and the nurse carrying 
    out the plan of treatment! 2or example$ a
    chest xray can detect pneumonia and the nurse can administer antibiot
    ic when
    prescribed by the doctor
    ! The uniform has evolved from 
    white caps$ white shoes

    and all white uniform to 
    colorful print scrubs and designer foot wear
    ! The nursing
    .eld is continuously growing and it will continue to grow as the rears progress!
     T
    opic (: Disc
    ussion Question (

    Descrie t’e de/nition of nursin* as )ut for&ard y t’e American Nurses
    Association. o& 
    does it 
    address t’e 
    meta)aradi*m t’eories of nursin*

     The ‘merican 
    *urses ‘ssociation de.nition of nursing is a r
    e&ection of the )uality of 
    care that all nurses 
    are to provide to their patient! The .eld s not a practice that
    focus on one aspec
    t of a patient$ but their entire wellbeing! The metaparadigm
    theories of nursing list several entities which includes person$ environment$ nursing
    and health5illness! *urses put these 
    entities into practice by developing a 
    care plan
    that includes both the patient and their family
    ! This can include patient teaching on
    a healthy 
    life style! The environment aspect includes providing safety while nursing
    care is being administered! The nursing aspect is providing optimum care to the
    patient$ and the health5illness is attending to the emotional as well as the spiritual
    needs of the patient! 6are that is pr
    ovided should be e
    xtensive and viewed as long
    term allowing the road to recovery to be ful.lling!
    7eference: 2
    iberg$ 0lia4abeth 0$ 6r
    easia$ 8oan 9! The 6onceptual 2oundation: The
    “ridge to professional *ursing ractice ;

    th

     edition!
     T
    opic <: Discussi on Question 1 1’e media% and olly&ood in )articular% re)resent one a!enue in &’ic’ t’e *eneral )ulic ecomes familiar &it’  t’e role of  nurses. o& does t’e media )ositi!ely or ne*ati!ely inuence t’e )ulic#s ima*e of nursin*, +’at ot’er a!enues may etter educate t’e *eneral )ulic on t’e role and sco)e of nursin* as &ell as t’e c’an*in* ‘ealt’ care system,  The media port rays nurses in both a negative and a positive manner ! I opt to watch shows that are .lmed in the 07 setting and has a lot of trauma$ by watching these shows I am able to shar pen my critical thin#ing s#ill and my assessment s#ills! I viewed one episode where a patient was allergic to peanuts and had an anaplastic reaction because his girlfriend did not brush her teeth after eating a peanut butter sandwich! This episode taught me  to be  mindful of my contact with latex when handing a patient who has  latex listed as an allergy ! ossible avenues that can better the public =s image of nursing is schools! The media will always .nd creative ways to negatively attest to a particular .eld however$ by nursing programs advertising their success with their students and developing a strong relationship within the commun ities they are located! They are able to show that changes within the health care system can be done simply by better educating the future wor#force! Professional Dynamics NRS-430V Essay Assignment Papers

  • NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    What do you look forward to as you begin this educational experience and your personal search for purpose? What is your greatest fear? How can you overcome it? Write about one specific educational experience from your past in which you addressed a fear and overcame it and how you succeeded in this process.

    NRS 430V Module 1 Assignment: CLC Group Project Agreement

    NRS 430V Module 2 Assignment: Educational Preparation

    NRS-430V Module 3 Assignment CLC: Nursing Conceptual Model Presentation

    NRS 430V Module 4 Assignment: Professional Development of Nursing Professionals

    NRS-430V Module 5 Assignment: Professional Associations Membership (ACCN Flyer)

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    NRS 430V Topic 1: Essentials of Baccalaureate Education

    Module 1 Assignment: CLC Group Project Agreement
                                                                                                        

    Topic 1: Discussion Question 1

    Topic 1: Discussion Question 2

    NRS 430V Topic 1 – Discussion Question 1: 
    Read Lake and von Baeyer’s article, “Tips for Successful Students.” Also, review the characteristics of a successful student as explained in the lecture. As you consider these, which is your strongest characteristic? Why? How will this characteristic help you to become a successful student in your program of study? NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS 430V Topic 1 – Discussion Question 2: 
    What do you look forward to as you begin this educational experience and your personal search for purpose? What is your greatest fear? How can you overcome it? Write about one specific educational experience from your past in which you addressed a fear and overcame it and how you succeeded in this process.

    NRS 430V Topic 2: Nursing History, Theories, and Conceptual Model

    Module 2 Assignment: Educational Preparation

    Topic 2: Discussion Question 1

    Topic 2: Discussion Question 2

    NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS’430V Topic 2 – Discussion Question 1: 
    How does knowledge of the foundations and history of nursing provide a context in which to understand current practice? Identify at least three trends in nursing practice from the “Nursing Timeline of Historical Events” media piece. How have these trends influenced your perspective of nursing practice?

    NRS 430V Topic 2 – Discussion Question 2: 
    Describe the definition of nursing as put forward by the American Nurses Association. How does it address the metaparadigm theories of nursing?

    NRS 430V Topic 3: Scope of Practice and Differentiated Practice Competencies

    Module 3 Assignment CLC: Nursing Conceptual Model Presentation [12 Slides + Speaker Notes]

    Topic 3: Discussion Question 1

    Topic 3: Discussion Question 2

    NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS 430V Topic 4: Professional Accountability, Standards of Practice, & Professional Development

    Module 4 Assignment: Professional Development of Nursing Professionals

    Topic 4: Discussion Question 1

    Topic 4: Discussion Question 2

    NRS 430V Module 4 Assignment: 
    Professional Development of Nursing Professionals

    NRS’430V Topic 4 – Discussion Question 1: 
    You have ……….. physicians would like nurses to adopt in the hospital. Discuss the process you would apply to determine whether the procedure falls within the RN scope of practice and how you would go about introducing the new procedure with physicians and fellow nurses. NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS.430V Topic 4 – Discussion Question 2: 
    Outline the process for developing nursing standards of practice, and identify the different entities that might be involved in developing a standard of practice.

    NRS 430V Topic 5: Advocacy and Activism

    Module 5 Assignment: Professional Associations Membership (ACCN Flyer)

    Topic 5: Discussion Question 1

    Topic 5: Discussion Question 2

    NRS 430V Module 5 Assignment: Professional Associations Membership (ACCN Flyer)

    NRS.430V Topic 5 – Discussion Question 1: 
    Discuss how evidence-based practice is applied in your practice setting and describe the desired patient outcome achieved through this approach.

    NRS 430V Topic 5 – Discussion Question 2: 
    Explain the value that professional nursing organizations have in networking and in the legislative process. Provide a rationale for your response. NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

     

    NRS 430V Topic 1 – Discussion Question 1: 
    Read Lake and von Baeyer’s article, “Tips for Successful Students.” Also, review the characteristics of a successful student as explained in the lecture. As you consider these, which is your strongest characteristic? Why? How will this characteristic help you to become a successful student in your program of study?

    NRS 430V Topic 1 – Discussion Question 2: 
    What do you look forward to as you begin this educational experience and your personal search for purpose? What is your greatest fear? How can you overcome it? Write about one specific educational experience from your past in which you addressed a fear and overcame it and how you succeeded in this process. NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS’430V Topic 2 – Discussion Question 1: 
    How does knowledge of the foundations and history of nursing provide a context in which to understand current practice? Identify at least three trends in nursing practice from the “Nursing Timeline of Historical Events” media piece. How have these trends influenced your perspective of nursing practice?

    NRS 430V Topic 2 – Discussion Question 2: 
    Describe the definition of nursing as put forward by the American Nurses Association. How does it address the metaparadigm theories of nursing?

    NRS.430V Topic 3 – Discussion Question 1: 
    The media, and Hollywood in particular, represent one avenue in which the general public becomes familiar with the role of nurses. How does the media positively or negatively influence the public’s image of nursing? What other avenues may better educate the general public on the role and scope of nursing as well as the changing health care system?

    NRS 430V Topic 3 – Discussion Question 2: 
    What factors need to be considered when determining whether or not identified actions are within the domain of nursing practice? Be sure to cite current literature in your response

    NRS’430V Topic 4 – Discussion Question 1: 
    You have ………… to investigate a new procedure that physicians would like nurses to adopt in the hospital. Discuss the process you would apply to determine whether the procedure falls within the RN scope of practice and how you would go about introducing the new procedure with physicians and fellow nurses. NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

    NRS.430V Topic 4 – Discussion Question 2: ……….
     the process for developing nursing standards of practice, and identify the different entities that might be involved in developing a standard of practice.

    NRS.430V Topic 5 – Discussion Question 1: 
    Discuss how evidence-based practice is applied in your practice setting and describe the desired patient outcome achieved through this approach.

    NRS 430V Topic 5 – Discussion Question 2: 
    Explain the value that professional nursing organizations have in networking and in the legislative process. Provide a rationale for your response. NURSING NRS-430V Professional Dynamics

  • PICOT Statement Review Rubric

    PICOT Statement Review Rubric

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory

    0.00%

    2

    Less than Satisfactory

    75.00%

    3

    Satisfactory

    79.00%

    4

    Good

    89.00%

    5

    Excellent

    100.00%

    Points

    Earned

    80.0 %Content

     

    30.0 %

    Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue

    Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed. PICOT Statement Review Rubric

    Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.

    Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement.

    Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions.

    Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.

    17.78/22.5

    30.0 %

    Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based Solution, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice

    Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included. PICOT Statement Review Rubric

    Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.

    Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.

    Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution.

    Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.

    17.78/22.5

    10.0 %

    PICOT Statement Focused on Resolution, Improvement, Application, and Intervention

    PICOT statement does not focus on resolution of a problem/issue, improvement of patient care or application of a nursing intervention.

    PICOT statement discusses a clinical problem/issue without a focus on improvement or intervention.

    PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue that improves patient care through the application of a nursing intervention.

    PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue, with discussion of improving patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.

    PICOT statement clearly focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue and aims at improving patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.

    5.93/7.5

    10.0 %

    PICOT Statement Including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time

    Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are not included.

    Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present, but lack detail or are incomplete.

    Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present.

    Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are clearly provided and well developed.

    Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

    5.93/7.5

    15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     PICOT Statement Review Rubric

    5.0 %

    Presentation

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    2.81/3.75

    5.0 %

    Argument Logic and Construction

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    2.81/3.75

    5.0 %

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    0.00/3.75

    5.0 %Format

     

    2.0 %

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    1.19/1.5

    5.0 %Format

     

    3.0 %

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    Sources are not documented.

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    2.00/2.25

    100 %

    Total Weightage

    PICOT Statement Review Rubric

    56.21/75

     

    PICOT Statement Review Rubric

  • Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory 0-71%

    0.00%

    2

    Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

    75.00%

    3

    Satisfactory 76-79%

    79.00%

    4

    Good 80-89%

    89.00%

    5

    Excellent 90-100%

    100.00%

    60.0 %Content

     

    5.0 %

    Background

    Background section is not present. Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Problem Statement

    Problem statement is not present.

    Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Change Proposal Purpose

    Purpose of change proposal is not present.

    Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    PICOT

    PICOT is not present.

    PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Literature Search Strategy

    Literature search strategy is not present. Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Literature Evaluation

    Literature evaluation is not present.

    Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)

    Theory utilization is not present.

    Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2)

    Implementation plan is not present.

    Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3)

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present.

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    5.0 %

    Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2)

    Appendices are not present. Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

    Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding.

    Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

    Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

    10.0 %

    Evidence of Revision

    Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

    Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

    Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

    Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

    Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

    30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     

    10.0 %

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    10.0 %

    Argument Logic and Construction

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    10.0 %

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    10.0 %Format

     

    5.0 %

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    5.0 %

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    Sources are not documented. Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    100 %

    Total Weightage

     

     

    Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal