Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] week 2 ass

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The SWOT analysis is an excellent tool to help a nursing leader assess the capacity for change within a unit. Think of yourself as a new leader on your unit and use this tool to help you determine if a change can be made based on what exists within and outside the unit. The purpose of this assignmen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The SWOT analysis is an excellent tool to help a nursing leader assess the capacity for change within a unit. Think of yourself as a new leader on your unit and use this tool to help you determine if a change can be made based on what exists within and outside the unit.
    The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a SWOT analysis to identify a healthcare issue within your organization that is commonly encountered by nurse leaders and has the potential to negatively impact patient care outcomes. This analysis will help you evaluate internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats, to develop strategies that enhance patient care, safety, and overall organizational performance. As a nurse leader, this tool will assist you in assessing the capacity for change within your unit, considering internal and external factors.
    **The selected topic will serve as the foundation for:**
    – Unit 4: Strategic Leadership Brief (Infographic Presentation with Voiceover)
    – Unit 6: Nurse Leader Interview and Strategic Leadership Brief Reflection Paper
    To support your understanding of the **SWOT analysis assignment**, I encourage you to view the provided video. This video offers valuable insights into the **purpose of SWOT analysis** and its application in identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats within healthcare organizations. It will also provide essential background information to guide you in completing your assignment effectively.

  • [Solved] Create a Reply for a discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please ensure that the Reply includes more than 200 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.** Screening: Advantages and Disadvantages Screening involves administering tests or measures to identify individuals who may have a particular condition, distinguishin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please ensure that the Reply includes more than 200 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.**
    Screening: Advantages and Disadvantages
    Screening involves administering tests or measures to identify individuals who may have a particular condition, distinguishing them from those likely to be free of it. This process is a vital aspect of preventive healthcare and can significantly influence both individual and population health outcomes (Wilson et al., 2021; Croswell et al., 2022). While screening programs offer numerous benefits, they also present potential drawbacks that must be thoughtfully considered when developing and implementing public health strategies (Singh et al., 2022; Rizzo & Rosenbaum, 2023).
    Advantages of Screening
    One of the most notable benefits of screening is its potential for early disease detection, which can facilitate timely intervention and treatment. This is especially critical for conditions such as cancer, hypertension, and diabetes, where prompt management can greatly diminish morbidity and mortality (Wilson et al., 2021). For example, regular mammography has proven to reduce breast cancer mortality by allowing for detection prior to the onset of symptoms.
    Screening programs play a significant role in enhancing resource allocation within healthcare. By identifying individuals at higher risk, healthcare providers can more effectively target interventions, ensuring that resources are allocated to those who need them most (Singh et al., 2022). Additionally, widespread screening generates valuable epidemiological data that helps monitor the prevalence of certain diseases, informing future health policies and research initiatives.
    Furthermore, many screening programs aim to increase public awareness and education regarding specific health conditions. Participation in these programs often includes access to counseling and educational materials, which can enhance health literacy and encourage healthier behaviors (Rizzo & Rosenbaum, 2023).
    Disadvantages of Screening
    Despite the advantages of screening, it also has its drawbacks. One significant concern is the potential for false positives, where individuals are mistakenly identified as having a condition. This can result in unnecessary anxiety, further invasive testing, and possibly overtreatment. Conversely, false negatives can create a misleading sense of security, delaying critical diagnoses and treatments (Croswell et al., 2022).
    Screening may also lead to overdiagnosis—the identification of conditions that would not have caused harm during an individual's lifetime. This overdiagnosis can result in unwarranted treatments that carry risks without delivering meaningful benefits. For instance, screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests has been linked to considerable rates of overdiagnosis (Rizzo & Rosenbaum, 2023).
    Another limitation is the cost associated with screening programs. While early detection can be cost-effective over time, the initial setup necessitates significant investments in infrastructure, training, and public outreach. If not carefully targeted, these screening programs may not achieve a favorable cost-benefit ratio, particularly in resource-constrained environments (Singh et al., 2022).
    Lastly, there are ethical considerations related to screening, including issues of informed consent and the psychological effects of test results. It is vital to ensure that individuals fully comprehend the risks and limitations of screening in order to maintain public trust and the effectiveness of such programs.
    Conclusion
    Screening is a crucial component of contemporary healthcare, enabling early detection and enhancing patient outcomes (Wilson et al., 2021; Croswell et al., 2022). However, it is important to approach screening judiciously, carefully balancing its potential benefits against possible harms (Rizzo & Rosenbaum, 2023; Singh et al., 2022). Effective planning, clear communication, and continuous evaluation are vital to ensure that screening programs remain both practical and ethically sound.
    References
    Croswell, J. M., Ransohoff, D. F., & Kramer, B. S. (2022). Principles of cancer screening: Insights from history and study design. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 328(2), 163–170.
    Rizzo, J. A., & Rosenbaum, S. J. (2023). Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: A significant public health challenge in preventive care. Preventive Medicine Reports, 32, 102084.
    Singh, R., Kumar, N., & Patel, A. (2022). Economic evaluation of screening programs in low- and middle-income countries: Challenges and opportunities. Global Health Action, 15(1), 2022705.
    Wilson, J. M. G., Jungner, G., & World Health Organization. (2021). Principles and practice of screening for disease (Revised edition). Geneva: WHO Press.

  • [Solved] WH D3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WH D3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] FNP CL2 D3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering FNP CL2 D3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] WH A4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WH A4.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] db2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Innovate Tech is developing a new product aimed at enhancing remote team collaboration. Unlike quantitative methods that focus on statistical data, qualitative research focuses on experiences and insights from individuals or small groups. In a qualitative study, Innovate Tech is using purposive samp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Innovate Tech is developing a new product aimed at enhancing remote team collaboration. Unlike quantitative methods that focus on statistical data, qualitative research focuses on experiences and insights from individuals or small groups.
    In a qualitative study, Innovate Tech is using purposive sampling, allowing it to select participants who are experienced remote team leaders and can thus provide valuable firsthand experiences and perspectives. This approach ensures that it captures rich, contextual data that highlight the challenges and successes faced by businesses in adapting to remote collaboration tools.
    Innovate Tech will be conducting in-depth interviews using open-ended questions for participants who have knowledge of different types of remote team structures, allowing diverse perspectives.
    To maintain rigor in its research methodology, Innovate Tech will follow key principles such as member checking and reflexivity. Member checking will establish credibility by allowing participants to review the findings, ensuring that their voices are accurately represented. Reflexivity will encourage the company to remain aware of its biases and assumptions throughout the research process, fostering a more authentic understanding of the qualitative data collected.
    Discuss the following questions with your peers:
    – How can purposive sampling enhance the validity of data collected from the remote team leaders?
    – How does member checking ensure that participants' voices are accurately represented?
    – What are some factors of reflexivity that are important in the research process?

  • [Solved] DB4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Grocery Zip, a leading provider of grocery delivery services, understands the changing scene of technology and how quantitative analysis is important to the process for making informed decisions. _Quantitative research_ is primarily concerned with quantifying characteristics, drawing statistical inf…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Grocery Zip, a leading provider of grocery delivery services, understands the changing scene of technology and how quantitative analysis is important to the process for making informed decisions. _Quantitative research_ is primarily concerned with quantifying characteristics, drawing statistical inferences, and establishing patterns within numerical data. Central to this investigation are concepts such as _descriptive statistics_, which summarize and organize raw data into meaningful patterns through measures like the mean, median, mode, variance, and standard deviation. For instance, Grocery Zip may analyze customer satisfaction scores by calculating the average score across numerous survey responses. This descriptive approach provides a clear picture of customer sentiment, allowing stakeholders to gauge whether their services meet user expectations.
    However, to delve deeper into the analysis, Grocery Zip must next consider inferential statistics, which enables it to make predictions or generalizations about a larger population based on sample data. By employing hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and regression analysis, Grocery Zip can assess factors such as how changes in product pricing affect customer satisfaction or predict sales a quarter ahead.
    Understanding the structure of research methods and testing models helps Grocery Zip interpret data accurately and ensure that conclusions drawn from quantitative analysis are sound. This connection between descriptive and inferential statistics facilitates a data-driven approach that is essential for supporting strategic business decisions.
    Analyze this [business data Excel file](https://resources.careered.com/LCMSFileSharePreview/Resources/MSExcelWorkbook/MGMT601_U3_DB_Data.xlsx), and then discuss the following with your fellow classmates:
    – From your analysis, what trends do you notice in the data?
    – What was more important to you in your analysis? Descriptive or inferential statistics? Why?
    – What decisions or management strategies would you recommend and why?
    \
    MGMT601_U3_DB_Data.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mgmt601-u3-db-data-xlsx "MGMT601_U3_DB_Data.xlsx")

  • [Solved] DB44

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Red Carpet Streaming has recognized the necessity of integrating mixed methods research into its decision-making processes. The blend of qualitative and quantitative research designs enables the company to gain deeper insights into user experiences and preferences while also assisting in the evaluat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Red Carpet Streaming has recognized the necessity of integrating mixed methods research into its decision-making processes. The blend of qualitative and quantitative research designs enables the company to gain deeper insights into user experiences and preferences while also assisting in the evaluation of business metrics. For example, Red Carpet Streaming’s recent decision to revamp its film and video catalog was informed by conducting surveys (quantitative) that identified user satisfaction levels and focus groups (qualitative) that provided narratives on customer needs.
    By employing statistical regression analysis, the company was able to identify significant predictors of app adoption on multiple platforms. The outcomes of these analyses not only validated initial hypotheses about market demand but also pinpointed specific areas for improvement, leading to strategic actions aimed at enhancing customer engagement and increasing programming quality. Thus, hypotheses not only inform and direct the research process but also catalyze actionable insights that drive business success.
    Moreover, the mixed methods approach has equipped Red Carpet Streaming to continually monitor and refine its business strategies. Through the utilization of both quantitative data (such as usage statistics) and qualitative data (from interviews and open-ended survey responses), decision-makers can make more informed judgments regarding development time lines and marketing campaigns.
    The triangulation of data obtained through mixed methods research ensures that various dimensions of the problem are addressed and reduces biases that might skew the understanding of user needs. As Red Carpet Streaming looks to deploy new programming in its upcoming product release, the insights garnered from the mixed methods research will play a pivotal role in shaping the strategic direction. The company is thus positioned not only to respond to current market demands but also to anticipate future trends, ensuring sustainable growth while continuously enhancing user satisfaction.
    Discuss the following questions with your peers:
    – What advantages does a company gain by integrating mixed methods research into its decision-making processes?
    – Why should the company triangulate data in a mixed methods study?
    – If a research hypothesis is supported with results, what implication might it have for a business strategy?

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NUR 504 506

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR506Dis.pdf – ## NUR504dis3.pdf **## NUR506Dis.pdf** NUR 506 Discussion 1 Nursing & Health-Care-Policy Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the health care delivery systems in the United States. Submission Instructions: • Your initial p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR506Dis.pdf

    – ## NUR504dis3.pdf

    **## NUR506Dis.pdf**

    NUR 506
    Discussion 1

    Nursing & Health-Care-Policy

    Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the
    health care delivery systems in the United States.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 2

    Advocacy

    What examples of advocacy do you see in your own nursing practice? List and discuss 2
    examples.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 3

    ACA and Health-Care Outcomes & Costs

    What components of the ACA do you think will have a positive effect on improving health care
    outcomes and decreasing costs?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 4

    Local, State & Federal Advocacy

    • What are specific actions that health professionals can take regardless of their practice
    area and site to promote population and community health?

    • What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the
    state or federal level?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 5

    Issues in Today's Workforce Culture

    Based on your reading in chapter 60, why do you think the issues presented in this chapter persist
    in today’s workforce culture?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 6

    Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ

    Discuss how to close the health care disparities gap in the LGBTQ community?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    **## NUR504dis3.pdf**

    Throat, Respiratory &
    Cardiovascular Disorders
    For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is
    building a health history for one of the following cases. Your
    instructor will assign you your case number. Case 2

    Case 1 Case 2 Case 3

    Chief
    Compl
    aint
    (CC)

    A 65-year-old male
    with chronic
    obstructive pulmonary
    disease (COPD)
    presents to the clinic
    with a cough he has
    had for the past 2
    weeks.

    A 25-year-old
    Hispanic female,
    computer programmer
    presents to your clinic
    complaining of a 12-
    day history of a runny
    nose

    A 75-year-old female
    reports experiencing
    pain in her chest while
    walking up steps
    today.

    Subje
    ctive

    denies chest pain,
    denies night sweats,
    admits to having a
    fever but does not
    know the temp.

    States that her
    symptoms began
    She suffers from
    allergies; she gets a
    runny nose during the
    spring-time, pollen
    season. However, in
    the winter, her
    allergies are not a
    problem.

    Could not sleep
    previous night. Feels
    like an ache or a
    burning sensation at
    the center of sternum.
    Denies any arm pain,
    pain was at a scale of
    8 in the AM now it is
    at a 2. Suffers from
    History of
    hypertension, denies
    heart disease, denies
    leg swelling up, denies
    pain feeling worse
    when taking deep
    breath.

    Objective Data

    VS

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air.

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air

    BP 129/70, (HR) 72
    and regular, (RR) 16
    unlabored,
    temperature 98.8°F,
    oral pulse oximetry is
    99%

    Gener
    al

    patient appears tired;
    skin color pale, patient
    is diaphoretic and
    sweaty, height 5′3″;
    weight 175 lbs

    No signs of acute
    distress. Patient
    appears mildly
    fatigued. She is
    breathing through her
    mouth. Breathing
    easily. Voice has a
    nasal quality to it.

    obese female, alert, in
    no acute distress.

    HEEN
    T

    EYES: no injection, no
    increase in lacrimation
    or purulent drainage;

    EARS: normal

    TM: Normal

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Obstructed air
    passages

    Ear canals: normal;

    EYES: normal;

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Nares: Obstructed air
    passages

    Atraumatic,
    normocephalic,
    PERRLA, EOMI, sclera
    with mild icterus,
    nares patent,
    nasopharynx clear,
    poor dentition –
    multiple carries.

    Respir
    atory

    lung crackles in LLL,
    no wheezes or rhonchi
    noted; does not clear
    with coughing;
    dullness to percussion
    over the LLL; shallow
    respirations and is 30,
    accessory muscles
    use not present

    CTA AP&L CTA AP&L

    Once you received your case number, answer the following
    questions:

    1. What other subjective data would you obtain?

    2. What other objective findings would you look for?

    3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order?

    4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient

    presenting symptoms?

    5. Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your instructor will assign you your case number and you
    will post on the case number you have been assigned.

    • You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and

    cited in current APA style with support from at least 2
    academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by
    extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance
    to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point
    per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where
    possible

    Neck/
    Throat

    no neck swelling or
    tenderness with
    palpation; neck is
    supple; no JVD;
    thyroid is not
    enlarged;

    trachea midline

    Posterior pharynx:
    mildly injected, scant
    postnasal drainage
    (PND), no exudate,
    tonsils 1+, no

    cobblestoning

    carotids are 2+
    without bruits; thyroid
    is not palpable; no
    lymphadenopathy

    Heart
    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    S1 and S2 normal
    without murmur,
    gallop, or rub

    **## NUR504dis3.pdf**

    Throat, Respiratory &
    Cardiovascular Disorders
    For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is
    building a health history for one of the following cases. Your
    instructor will assign you your case number. Case 2

    Case 1 Case 2 Case 3

    Chief
    Compl
    aint
    (CC)

    A 65-year-old male
    with chronic
    obstructive pulmonary
    disease (COPD)
    presents to the clinic
    with a cough he has
    had for the past 2
    weeks.

    A 25-year-old
    Hispanic female,
    computer programmer
    presents to your clinic
    complaining of a 12-
    day history of a runny
    nose

    A 75-year-old female
    reports experiencing
    pain in her chest while
    walking up steps
    today.

    Subje
    ctive

    denies chest pain,
    denies night sweats,
    admits to having a
    fever but does not
    know the temp.

    States that her
    symptoms began
    She suffers from
    allergies; she gets a
    runny nose during the
    spring-time, pollen
    season. However, in
    the winter, her
    allergies are not a
    problem.

    Could not sleep
    previous night. Feels
    like an ache or a
    burning sensation at
    the center of sternum.
    Denies any arm pain,
    pain was at a scale of
    8 in the AM now it is
    at a 2. Suffers from
    History of
    hypertension, denies
    heart disease, denies
    leg swelling up, denies
    pain feeling worse
    when taking deep
    breath.

    Objective Data

    VS

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air.

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air

    BP 129/70, (HR) 72
    and regular, (RR) 16
    unlabored,
    temperature 98.8°F,
    oral pulse oximetry is
    99%

    Gener
    al

    patient appears tired;
    skin color pale, patient
    is diaphoretic and
    sweaty, height 5′3″;
    weight 175 lbs

    No signs of acute
    distress. Patient
    appears mildly
    fatigued. She is
    breathing through her
    mouth. Breathing
    easily. Voice has a
    nasal quality to it.

    obese female, alert, in
    no acute distress.

    HEEN
    T

    EYES: no injection, no
    increase in lacrimation
    or purulent drainage;

    EARS: normal

    TM: Normal

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Obstructed air
    passages

    Ear canals: normal;

    EYES: normal;

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Nares: Obstructed air
    passages

    Atraumatic,
    normocephalic,
    PERRLA, EOMI, sclera
    with mild icterus,
    nares patent,
    nasopharynx clear,
    poor dentition –
    multiple carries.

    Respir
    atory

    lung crackles in LLL,
    no wheezes or rhonchi
    noted; does not clear
    with coughing;
    dullness to percussion
    over the LLL; shallow
    respirations and is 30,
    accessory muscles
    use not present

    CTA AP&L CTA AP&L

    Once you received your case number, answer the following
    questions:

    1. What other subjective data would you obtain?

    2. What other objective findings would you look for?

    3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order?

    4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient

    presenting symptoms?

    5. Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your instructor will assign you your case number and you
    will post on the case number you have been assigned.

    • You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and

    cited in current APA style with support from at least 2
    academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by
    extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance
    to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point
    per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where
    possible

    Neck/
    Throat

    no neck swelling or
    tenderness with
    palpation; neck is
    supple; no JVD;
    thyroid is not
    enlarged;

    trachea midline

    Posterior pharynx:
    mildly injected, scant
    postnasal drainage
    (PND), no exudate,
    tonsils 1+, no

    cobblestoning

    carotids are 2+
    without bruits; thyroid
    is not palpable; no
    lymphadenopathy

    Heart
    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    S1 and S2 normal
    without murmur,
    gallop, or rub

    **## NUR506Dis.pdf**

    NUR 506
    Discussion 1

    Nursing & Health-Care-Policy

    Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the
    health care delivery systems in the United States.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 2

    Advocacy

    What examples of advocacy do you see in your own nursing practice? List and discuss 2
    examples.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 3

    ACA and Health-Care Outcomes & Costs

    What components of the ACA do you think will have a positive effect on improving health care
    outcomes and decreasing costs?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 4

    Local, State & Federal Advocacy

    • What are specific actions that health professionals can take regardless of their practice
    area and site to promote population and community health?

    • What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the
    state or federal level?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 5

    Issues in Today's Workforce Culture

    Based on your reading in chapter 60, why do you think the issues presented in this chapter persist
    in today’s workforce culture?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 6

    Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ

    Discuss how to close the health care disparities gap in the LGBTQ community?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    **## NUR504dis3.pdf**

    Throat, Respiratory &
    Cardiovascular Disorders
    For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is
    building a health history for one of the following cases. Your
    instructor will assign you your case number. Case 2

    Case 1 Case 2 Case 3

    Chief
    Compl
    aint
    (CC)

    A 65-year-old male
    with chronic
    obstructive pulmonary
    disease (COPD)
    presents to the clinic
    with a cough he has
    had for the past 2
    weeks.

    A 25-year-old
    Hispanic female,
    computer programmer
    presents to your clinic
    complaining of a 12-
    day history of a runny
    nose

    A 75-year-old female
    reports experiencing
    pain in her chest while
    walking up steps
    today.

    Subje
    ctive

    denies chest pain,
    denies night sweats,
    admits to having a
    fever but does not
    know the temp.

    States that her
    symptoms began
    She suffers from
    allergies; she gets a
    runny nose during the
    spring-time, pollen
    season. However, in
    the winter, her
    allergies are not a
    problem.

    Could not sleep
    previous night. Feels
    like an ache or a
    burning sensation at
    the center of sternum.
    Denies any arm pain,
    pain was at a scale of
    8 in the AM now it is
    at a 2. Suffers from
    History of
    hypertension, denies
    heart disease, denies
    leg swelling up, denies
    pain feeling worse
    when taking deep
    breath.

    Objective Data

    VS

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air.

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air

    BP 129/70, (HR) 72
    and regular, (RR) 16
    unlabored,
    temperature 98.8°F,
    oral pulse oximetry is
    99%

    Gener
    al

    patient appears tired;
    skin color pale, patient
    is diaphoretic and
    sweaty, height 5′3″;
    weight 175 lbs

    No signs of acute
    distress. Patient
    appears mildly
    fatigued. She is
    breathing through her
    mouth. Breathing
    easily. Voice has a
    nasal quality to it.

    obese female, alert, in
    no acute distress.

    HEEN
    T

    EYES: no injection, no
    increase in lacrimation
    or purulent drainage;

    EARS: normal

    TM: Normal

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Obstructed air
    passages

    Ear canals: normal;

    EYES: normal;

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Nares: Obstructed air
    passages

    Atraumatic,
    normocephalic,
    PERRLA, EOMI, sclera
    with mild icterus,
    nares patent,
    nasopharynx clear,
    poor dentition –
    multiple carries.

    Respir
    atory

    lung crackles in LLL,
    no wheezes or rhonchi
    noted; does not clear
    with coughing;
    dullness to percussion
    over the LLL; shallow
    respirations and is 30,
    accessory muscles
    use not present

    CTA AP&L CTA AP&L

    Once you received your case number, answer the following
    questions:

    1. What other subjective data would you obtain?

    2. What other objective findings would you look for?

    3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order?

    4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient

    presenting symptoms?

    5. Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your instructor will assign you your case number and you
    will post on the case number you have been assigned.

    • You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and

    cited in current APA style with support from at least 2
    academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by
    extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance
    to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point
    per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where
    possible

    Neck/
    Throat

    no neck swelling or
    tenderness with
    palpation; neck is
    supple; no JVD;
    thyroid is not
    enlarged;

    trachea midline

    Posterior pharynx:
    mildly injected, scant
    postnasal drainage
    (PND), no exudate,
    tonsils 1+, no

    cobblestoning

    carotids are 2+
    without bruits; thyroid
    is not palpable; no
    lymphadenopathy

    Heart
    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    S1 and S2 normal
    without murmur,
    gallop, or rub

    **## NUR506Dis.pdf**

    NUR 506
    Discussion 1

    Nursing & Health-Care-Policy

    Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the
    health care delivery systems in the United States.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 2

    Advocacy

    What examples of advocacy do you see in your own nursing practice? List and discuss 2
    examples.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 3

    ACA and Health-Care Outcomes & Costs

    What components of the ACA do you think will have a positive effect on improving health care
    outcomes and decreasing costs?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 4

    Local, State & Federal Advocacy

    • What are specific actions that health professionals can take regardless of their practice
    area and site to promote population and community health?

    • What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the
    state or federal level?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 5

    Issues in Today's Workforce Culture

    Based on your reading in chapter 60, why do you think the issues presented in this chapter persist
    in today’s workforce culture?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Discussion 6

    Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ

    Discuss how to close the health care disparities gap in the LGBTQ community?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style
    with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or
    adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per
    response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    **## NUR504dis3.pdf**

    Throat, Respiratory &
    Cardiovascular Disorders
    For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is
    building a health history for one of the following cases. Your
    instructor will assign you your case number. Case 2

    Case 1 Case 2 Case 3

    Chief
    Compl
    aint
    (CC)

    A 65-year-old male
    with chronic
    obstructive pulmonary
    disease (COPD)
    presents to the clinic
    with a cough he has
    had for the past 2
    weeks.

    A 25-year-old
    Hispanic female,
    computer programmer
    presents to your clinic
    complaining of a 12-
    day history of a runny
    nose

    A 75-year-old female
    reports experiencing
    pain in her chest while
    walking up steps
    today.

    Subje
    ctive

    denies chest pain,
    denies night sweats,
    admits to having a
    fever but does not
    know the temp.

    States that her
    symptoms began
    She suffers from
    allergies; she gets a
    runny nose during the
    spring-time, pollen
    season. However, in
    the winter, her
    allergies are not a
    problem.

    Could not sleep
    previous night. Feels
    like an ache or a
    burning sensation at
    the center of sternum.
    Denies any arm pain,
    pain was at a scale of
    8 in the AM now it is
    at a 2. Suffers from
    History of
    hypertension, denies
    heart disease, denies
    leg swelling up, denies
    pain feeling worse
    when taking deep
    breath.

    Objective Data

    VS

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air.

    (BP) 115/75, (P) 89,
    (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F
    (38°C), O2 sat 98% on
    room air

    BP 129/70, (HR) 72
    and regular, (RR) 16
    unlabored,
    temperature 98.8°F,
    oral pulse oximetry is
    99%

    Gener
    al

    patient appears tired;
    skin color pale, patient
    is diaphoretic and
    sweaty, height 5′3″;
    weight 175 lbs

    No signs of acute
    distress. Patient
    appears mildly
    fatigued. She is
    breathing through her
    mouth. Breathing
    easily. Voice has a
    nasal quality to it.

    obese female, alert, in
    no acute distress.

    HEEN
    T

    EYES: no injection, no
    increase in lacrimation
    or purulent drainage;

    EARS: normal

    TM: Normal

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Obstructed air
    passages

    Ear canals: normal;

    EYES: normal;

    NOSE: Bilateral
    erythema and edema
    of turbinates with
    significant yellow
    drainage on the right.
    Nares: Obstructed air
    passages

    Atraumatic,
    normocephalic,
    PERRLA, EOMI, sclera
    with mild icterus,
    nares patent,
    nasopharynx clear,
    poor dentition –
    multiple carries.

    Respir
    atory

    lung crackles in LLL,
    no wheezes or rhonchi
    noted; does not clear
    with coughing;
    dullness to percussion
    over the LLL; shallow
    respirations and is 30,
    accessory muscles
    use not present

    CTA AP&L CTA AP&L

    Once you received your case number, answer the following
    questions:

    1. What other subjective data would you obtain?

    2. What other objective findings would you look for?

    3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order?

    4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient

    presenting symptoms?

    5. Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your instructor will assign you your case number and you
    will post on the case number you have been assigned.

    • You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and

    cited in current APA style with support from at least 2
    academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by
    extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance
    to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point
    per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where
    possible

    Neck/
    Throat

    no neck swelling or
    tenderness with
    palpation; neck is
    supple; no JVD;
    thyroid is not
    enlarged;

    trachea midline

    Posterior pharynx:
    mildly injected, scant
    postnasal drainage
    (PND), no exudate,
    tonsils 1+, no

    cobblestoning

    carotids are 2+
    without bruits; thyroid
    is not palpable; no
    lymphadenopathy

    Heart
    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    Regular rate and
    rhythm, no murmur,
    S3, or S4

    S1 and S2 normal
    without murmur,
    gallop, or rub

    – 1
    – 2