Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] Abnormal Psychology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Abnormal Psychology.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Psychology Week 6 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Select a critical incident (Palisades Fire) that has occurred within the last year that you can use to respond to the questions. – Review crisis intervention theories and the categories of crisis. – Consider why some individuals may be more resilient when experiencing a crisis than others. Answer th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Select a critical incident (Palisades Fire) that has occurred within the last year that you can use to respond to the questions.
    – Review crisis intervention theories and the categories of crisis.
    – Consider why some individuals may be more resilient when experiencing a crisis than others. Answer the following questions:
    _“Can you explain to us what kind of crisis the Palisades Fire is, and tell us why classifying a crisis matters?”_
    “ _I understand that you use theory in your crisis work. What do you use? How does it work?”_
    _“Let’s talk about the concept of resilience. Can you share with us why people respond differently to the same crisis? I mean, why does it appear that some people just get over it, while others can’t? Why can’t they see they survived, and life goes on?”_
    _“To wrap things up, as a crisis responder, you know how difficult this work can be. How do you take care of yourself when you are working with so many people who are experiencing this crisis? And for some of our viewers who may be helping with this crisis in our community, what advice do you have for them with regard to how they care for themselves while caring for others?”_
    References
    James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2017). _Crisis intervention strategies_ (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
    Nuttman-Shwartz, O., & Green, O. (2020). [Resilience truths: Trauma resilience workers’ points of view toward resilience in continuous traumatic situations.Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pdh&AN=2020-99931-001&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200) _International Journal of Stress Management._
    Raghavan, S. S., & Sandanapitchai, P. (2019). [Cultural predictors of resilience in a multinational sample of trauma survivors.Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00131) _Frontiers in Psychology,_ 10.
    Fuller, T., Baker, M., Migliozzi, B., Lai, K. K. R., & Wolfe, J. (2025, January 13). What Caused the Palisades Fire? The Site of the Ignition Point Holds Clues. _The New York Times_. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/13/us/palisades-fire-cause-ignition-point-site.html
    \
    Week61.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week61-pdf-10343433 "Week61.pdf")
    \
    Week62.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week62-pdf-10343435 "Week62.pdf")
    \
    EBSCO-FullText-07_01_20252.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-01-20252-pdf-10343437 "EBSCO-FullText-07_01_20252.pdf")
    \
    fpsyg-10-00131.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/fpsyg-10-00131-pdf-10343439 "fpsyg-10-00131.pdf")

  • [Solved] Psychology Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please no AI follow the instructions.. – ## Week1_Assignment4.pdf **## Week1_Assignment4.pdf** Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modul…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please no AI follow the instructions..

    – ## Week1_Assignment4.pdf

    **## Week1_Assignment4.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278

    Everyone has preconceptions and biases that may escape personal awareness. Cognitive biases
    can lead to flawed thinking. As a student of psychology, you should be prepared to set aside your
    preconceived notions and use critical thinking to objectively evaluate information in order to
    minimize bias.

    For this Assignment, you examine how cognitive bias has influenced your own thinking in a social
    psychological context and how to use critical thinking to proactively identify cognitive biases. You
    also consider how your awareness of cognitive bias and critical thinking will contribute to your
    personal, professional, and academic success.

    CRITICAL THINKING IN APPLICATION OF
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

    (https://cdn-

    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    RESOURCES

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

    Describe a situation in which a decision you made or a belief you had was influenced by
    one of the 12 cognitive biases explained in the Practical Psychology video

    Resources

    Biswas-Diener, R. (2025). An introduction to the science of social psychology
    (https://noba.to/s64y5c2m) . In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook
    series: Psychology. DEF publishers. https://noba.to/s64y5c2m

    Only read from the start of the page through “Social Psychology is a Science”.

    Time Estimate: 8 min

    Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
    Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
    where otherwise noted.

    Practical Psychology. (2016, December 30). 12 cognitive biases explained—how to
    think better and more logically removing bias (https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=wEwGBIr_RIw) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=wEwGBIr_RIw

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts
    and tools (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?
    download_frd=1) (8th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Read pages 9, 14-17, and 19-22.
    Time Estimate: 10 min

    The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, 8th Edition by Paul, R.;
    Elder, L. Copyright 2020 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Reprinted by permission of
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2025.

    BY DAY 7

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2005_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw) . Be specific with how the cognitive bias
    influenced your decision or belief.
    Explain how one of the questions from the Paul and Elder (2020)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)
    resource would have helped you understand your own thinking in this situation.
    Provide one specific example of how awareness of cognitive bias and critical thinking will
    contribute to success in your personal, professional, or academic life.

    To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
    the Learning Resources.

    Be sure to review the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
    your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

    1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Description of
    how one
    cognitive bias
    affected
    student’s
    decision or
    belief

    25 pts

    Explanation
    of how one
    question from
    Elements of
    Thought or
    the Universal
    Intellectual
    Standards
    would have
    helped
    student to
    understand
    their thinking

    25 pts

    Example of
    how
    awareness of
    cognitive bias
    and critical
    thinking will
    contribute to
    success in
    student’s
    personal,
    professional,
    or academic
    life

    20 pts

    Format and
    writing

    10 pts

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    20 to >17.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    17 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    10 to >8.0 pts 8 to >6.0 pts 6 to >0 pts

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes more than
    one explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, and an
    effort to cite the original
    source was made if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions.

    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    The submission contains
    few spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English, OR
    these deviations do not
    affect clear
    communication.     Work
    includes at least one
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions and a clear
    attempt at citing the source
    has been made.

    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    Multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English affect
    clear communication.
    Work does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without
    attempting to cite the
    source.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

    **## Week1_Assignment4.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278

    Everyone has preconceptions and biases that may escape personal awareness. Cognitive biases
    can lead to flawed thinking. As a student of psychology, you should be prepared to set aside your
    preconceived notions and use critical thinking to objectively evaluate information in order to
    minimize bias.

    For this Assignment, you examine how cognitive bias has influenced your own thinking in a social
    psychological context and how to use critical thinking to proactively identify cognitive biases. You
    also consider how your awareness of cognitive bias and critical thinking will contribute to your
    personal, professional, and academic success.

    CRITICAL THINKING IN APPLICATION OF
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

    (https://cdn-

    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    RESOURCES

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303278)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

    Describe a situation in which a decision you made or a belief you had was influenced by
    one of the 12 cognitive biases explained in the Practical Psychology video

    Resources

    Biswas-Diener, R. (2025). An introduction to the science of social psychology
    (https://noba.to/s64y5c2m) . In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook
    series: Psychology. DEF publishers. https://noba.to/s64y5c2m

    Only read from the start of the page through “Social Psychology is a Science”.

    Time Estimate: 8 min

    Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
    Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
    where otherwise noted.

    Practical Psychology. (2016, December 30). 12 cognitive biases explained—how to
    think better and more logically removing bias (https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=wEwGBIr_RIw) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=wEwGBIr_RIw

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts
    and tools (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?
    download_frd=1) (8th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Read pages 9, 14-17, and 19-22.
    Time Estimate: 10 min

    The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, 8th Edition by Paul, R.;
    Elder, L. Copyright 2020 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Reprinted by permission of
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2025.

    BY DAY 7

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://noba.to/s64y5c2m](https://noba.to/s64y5c2m)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2005_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw) . Be specific with how the cognitive bias
    influenced your decision or belief.
    Explain how one of the questions from the Paul and Elder (2020)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)
    resource would have helped you understand your own thinking in this situation.
    Provide one specific example of how awareness of cognitive bias and critical thinking will
    contribute to success in your personal, professional, or academic life.

    To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
    the Learning Resources.

    Be sure to review the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
    your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

    1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEwGBIr_RIw)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324259/download?download_frd=1)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Description of
    how one
    cognitive bias
    affected
    student’s
    decision or
    belief

    25 pts

    Explanation
    of how one
    question from
    Elements of
    Thought or
    the Universal
    Intellectual
    Standards
    would have
    helped
    student to
    understand
    their thinking

    25 pts

    Example of
    how
    awareness of
    cognitive bias
    and critical
    thinking will
    contribute to
    success in
    student’s
    personal,
    professional,
    or academic
    life

    20 pts

    Format and
    writing

    10 pts

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    20 to >17.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    17 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    10 to >8.0 pts 8 to >6.0 pts 6 to >0 pts

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes more than
    one explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, and an
    effort to cite the original
    source was made if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions.

    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    The submission contains
    few spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English, OR
    these deviations do not
    affect clear
    communication.     Work
    includes at least one
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions and a clear
    attempt at citing the source
    has been made.

    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    Multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English affect
    clear communication.
    Work does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without
    attempting to cite the
    source.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

  • [Solved] Learning Outcomes

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    APA 7th edition follow reading and instructions – ## Video.docx – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf – ## 2-LearningOutcomesforTeachingDemonstrationAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf – AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx – …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    APA 7th edition
    follow reading and instructions

    – ## Video.docx

    – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf

    – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf

    – ## 2-LearningOutcomesforTeachingDemonstrationAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf

    – AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx
    – ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf
    – QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## 2-LearningOutcomesforTeachingDemonstrationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Learning Outcomes for Teaching Demonstration Assignment Instructions**

    Your Learning Objectives (LOs) will provide the core of your teaching demonstration so make sure you develop them correctly. How well you state your LOs, and how strong they are, will largely determine the strength of your demonstration.

    To start, carefully review
    **Read: Creating Learning Outcomes**. Review it several times so that you include all the necessary elements. The other documents on appropriate action verbs associated with each level of thought and sample questions for each thought level are important as well.

    Follow these guidelines when writing good LOs:

    1. Focus only on the highest levels of thought from Bloom’s taxonomy and the Anderson and Krathwohl revision of Bloom—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation._ Do not write LOs on the lower levels of thought.

    2. Using strong action verbs, mention only one activity/outcome for each LO.

    3. Use action verbs from the lists provided in class associated with each level of thought. So, instead of saying in a LO “Students will evaluate. . .” it would be better to say, “Students will judge the effectiveness of. . .” Do you want your students to compare and contrast, solve a problem, come up with a better idea, discover weaknesses in a therapeutic approach? Choose verbs that specifically indicate what you want your students to demonstrate. Then you take your students through active learning activities that address those elements.

    4. As illustrated in the class PPT on LOs, you must include measurable behavioral outcomes for each LO.

    Keep in mind that writing excellent LOs is an arduous task.

    For this assignment, write 3-5 LOs following the guidelines above. Any sources, if needed, should be cited in APA format. Submit your LOs to the class link.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343251)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343245)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343249)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343249)

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## 2-LearningOutcomesforTeachingDemonstrationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Learning Outcomes for Teaching Demonstration Assignment Instructions**

    Your Learning Objectives (LOs) will provide the core of your teaching demonstration so make sure you develop them correctly. How well you state your LOs, and how strong they are, will largely determine the strength of your demonstration.

    To start, carefully review
    **Read: Creating Learning Outcomes**. Review it several times so that you include all the necessary elements. The other documents on appropriate action verbs associated with each level of thought and sample questions for each thought level are important as well.

    Follow these guidelines when writing good LOs:

    1. Focus only on the highest levels of thought from Bloom’s taxonomy and the Anderson and Krathwohl revision of Bloom—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation._ Do not write LOs on the lower levels of thought.

    2. Using strong action verbs, mention only one activity/outcome for each LO.

    3. Use action verbs from the lists provided in class associated with each level of thought. So, instead of saying in a LO “Students will evaluate. . .” it would be better to say, “Students will judge the effectiveness of. . .” Do you want your students to compare and contrast, solve a problem, come up with a better idea, discover weaknesses in a therapeutic approach? Choose verbs that specifically indicate what you want your students to demonstrate. Then you take your students through active learning activities that address those elements.

    4. As illustrated in the class PPT on LOs, you must include measurable behavioral outcomes for each LO.

    Keep in mind that writing excellent LOs is an arduous task.

    For this assignment, write 3-5 LOs following the guidelines above. Any sources, if needed, should be cited in APA format. Submit your LOs to the class link.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343251)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343245)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343249)

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## 2-LearningOutcomesforTeachingDemonstrationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Learning Outcomes for Teaching Demonstration Assignment Instructions**

    Your Learning Objectives (LOs) will provide the core of your teaching demonstration so make sure you develop them correctly. How well you state your LOs, and how strong they are, will largely determine the strength of your demonstration.

    To start, carefully review
    **Read: Creating Learning Outcomes**. Review it several times so that you include all the necessary elements. The other documents on appropriate action verbs associated with each level of thought and sample questions for each thought level are important as well.

    Follow these guidelines when writing good LOs:

    1. Focus only on the highest levels of thought from Bloom’s taxonomy and the Anderson and Krathwohl revision of Bloom—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation._ Do not write LOs on the lower levels of thought.

    2. Using strong action verbs, mention only one activity/outcome for each LO.

    3. Use action verbs from the lists provided in class associated with each level of thought. So, instead of saying in a LO “Students will evaluate. . .” it would be better to say, “Students will judge the effectiveness of. . .” Do you want your students to compare and contrast, solve a problem, come up with a better idea, discover weaknesses in a therapeutic approach? Choose verbs that specifically indicate what you want your students to demonstrate. Then you take your students through active learning activities that address those elements.

    4. As illustrated in the class PPT on LOs, you must include measurable behavioral outcomes for each LO.

    Keep in mind that writing excellent LOs is an arduous task.

    For this assignment, write 3-5 LOs following the guidelines above. Any sources, if needed, should be cited in APA format. Submit your LOs to the class link.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343251)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343245)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343249)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7
    – 8

  • [Solved] discussions 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Discussion2T5.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion2t5-png "Discussion2T5.PNG") \ Discussion1T5.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion1t5-png "Discussion1T5.PNG")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Discussion2T5.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion2t5-png "Discussion2T5.PNG")
    \
    Discussion1T5.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion1t5-png "Discussion1T5.PNG")

  • [Solved] simple assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Topic5Assessment.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5assessment-png "Topic5Assessment.PNG")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Topic5Assessment.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5assessment-png "Topic5Assessment.PNG")

  • [Solved] Order Thinking

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    APA 7th edition 10-15 pages follow reading and instructions – ## Video.docx – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf – ## HigherOrderThinkingSkillsGradingRubric.pdf – ## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf – ## Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_Question_Te.pdf -…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    APA 7th edition
    10-15 pages
    follow reading and instructions

    – ## Video.docx

    – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf

    – ## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf

    – ## HigherOrderThinkingSkillsGradingRubric.pdf

    – ## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf

    – ## Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_Question_Te.pdf

    – ## 1-HigherOrderThinkingSkillsAssignmentInstructions125.docx

    – AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx
    – ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf
    – QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## HigherOrderThinkingSkillsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 88 to >80 pts

    Advanced

    Superbly
    includes
    assignment
    parameters
    with adequate
    support from
    class content.

    80 to >73 pts

    Proficient

    Adequately includes
    assignment parameters
    with adequate support
    from class content.

    73 to >66 pts

    Developing

    Includes most
    assignment parameters
    with some support from
    class content. Depth of
    content is marginal at
    the doctoral level of
    study.

    66 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assignment
    demonstrated
    deficits at the
    doctoral level of
    study.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    88 pts

    Writing,
    Formatting,
    and
    Citation

    37 to >33 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    writing is
    exceptionally
    clear,
    persuasive
    and error free.
    Ideas are fully
    supported and
    correctly cited
    using current
    APA
    formatting.

    33 to >30 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas are adequately
    presented; sentences
    are correctly
    constructed, and
    paragraphs are
    organized consistently
    with doctoral level
    writing.
    Writing is largely free of
    grammar, punctuation,
    and other writing errors.
    Contains any
    appropriate citations and
    APA formatting.

    30 to >27 pts

    Developing

    Student’s writing
    deviates from the
    requirements in the
    “proficient” column in
    several ways.

    27 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student’s
    writing deviates
    from the
    requirements in
    the “proficient”
    column in
    numerous
    ways.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    37 pts

    Total Points: 125

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Grading Rubric | EDCO725_D02_202530

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **## Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_Question_Te.pdf**

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Question Templates

    Recall

    Note: Any question becomes a recall
    question if the answer has already
    been explicitly provided to the student
    in class or in the text.

    When did ________ take place?

    List the ________ .

    Define the term ________.

    What is a ________?

    Who did ________?

    Name ________.

    Analysis

    How does ________ work?

    Sort these ________ .

    Use the table to determine ________ .

    Use the graph to determine ________ .

    Graph ________ .

    What caused ________ ?

    What is another possible cause of ________ ?

    Outline the ________ .

    Based on the written description, draw a
    diagram.

    Draw your own map of ________ without
    tracing or copying.

    Use the map to determine ________ .

    In what sequence did ________ happen?

    Break ________ down into its component
    parts.

    Give an example of ________ .

    What literary form is being used?

    What technique is being used?

    What information is needed?

    Is the information relevant?

    Into what groups can you organize these?

    Draw a picture that illustrates what's described
    in the story ________ .

    What does ________ symbolize?

    Find examples of [a literary device] in your
    readings.

    Analyze the ________ in ________ .

    Classify these ________ according to
    ________ .

    Separate the ________ from the ________ .

    Translate ________ .

    Analyze how ________ .

    Explain how ________ works.

    What was the author's point of view?

    How did the author convey ________ ?

    What words does the author use to paint an
    image of ________ in your mind?

    How were ________ used to ________ ?

    What kind of a ________ is this?

    Which one doesn't belong in this group?

    What is the function of ________ ?

    What is the purpose of ________ ?

    What is the relationship between ________
    and ________ ?

    What is the pattern?

    Use manipulatives to illustrate a concept.

    Build a model of ________ .

    Measure ________ .

    Comparison

    How is ________ like ________ ?

    How are ________ and ________ different?

    Compare the ________ before and after
    ________ .

    Compare the character ________ at the
    beginning of the story and at the end.

    Distinguish between ________ and
    ________ .

    Compare ________ with ________ .

    On what dimensions might you compare
    ________ and ________ ?

    Which one is the biggest/oldest/tallest?

    Inference

    Hypothesize what will happen if ________ .

    Predict what will happen if ________ .

    Apply the rule to ________ .

    Solve the problem ________ .

    Predict how the story ________ will end.

    What is the main idea of the story ________ ?

    What is the overall theme of ________ ?

    What is the moral of the story?

    Develop of plan to ________ .

    Propose and describe an invention that fills
    some need.

    Write a research paper on ________ .

    Based on your readings, what can you
    conclude about ________ ?

    What was the author's point of view?

    Solve a logic puzzle.

    What if ________ ?

    What rule applies here?

    What generalization can you make from this
    information?

    Create a ________ .

    Design a ________ .

    Propose a solution to the problem of _______
    .

    Evaluation

    Was ________ worth the costs? Explain your
    answer.

    Was the argument convincing? What makes
    you think so?

    Did ________ behave appropriately? Why?

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Write a critique of ________ .

    Was this experiment well designed? Defend
    your answer.

    Judge which is the best solution to the
    problem of ________ ? Why do you think so?

    How well are the conclusions supported by the
    data/ facts/evidence? Explain.

    Did ________ choose a wise course of
    action? Give reasons.

    Apply a scoring rubric to this piece of work.
    Explain why you are assigning each score.

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Review a book, performance, or exhibit.
    Justify your evaluation.

    Which ________ is the best? Why do you
    think so?

    Whose arguments/evidence was more
    convincing? Why?

    If you were the judge, what would your
    decision be? Why?

    Give and justify your opinion on ________ .

    **## 1-HigherOrderThinkingSkillsAssignmentInstructions125.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Higher Order Thinking Skills Assignment Instructions**

    · Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7).

    · Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages.

    · There is no suggestion of a minimum or maximum page length; length will vary based on your topic.

    · Please ensure that you fully complete the parameters mentioned below.

    **Overview**

    The week three content includes
    **_higher order thinking skills_** (HOTS) along with
    **_active learning/teaching strategies._** *

    Incorporating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is an essential component in “teaching to think” and critical for adult learning and especially graduate level learning. This exercise will give you practice in incorporating HOTS into active learning/teaching strategies for your own proposed teaching demonstration.

    **Instructions**

    In your own mind, review the highest levels of thought per Bloom and Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation_.

    Choose ONE of the critical thought levels and design a teaching activity for that thought level that would fit your own teaching topic and teaching demonstration that you will submit in the
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment**. Please note that your
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment** will require more than one active learning/teaching strategy, but you will get practice in developing one of those for this assignment.

    Use the class handout which lists sample questions and below you will find a few suggested learning activities for two levels of higher thought. An internet search will also suggest numerous other activities for the various thought levels. Please also review the explanations of several active learning strategies to which you have been introduced in all three of our class texts (below).

    So, for example, if your topic is exploring the counseling approaches used for combat veterans with PTSD, you might set up a debate to argue the strengths and weaknesses of two therapeutic approaches. Or you might introduce a case to use for a new therapeutic application and have students argue the value or disadvantages of the new therapy approach.

    In this assignment, provide adequate detail about how you would develop the learning activity. Provide the actual cases, for instance, if those are used, and suggest the penetrating questions that would guide the discussion. Justify your choice of activity. Why was your active learning strategy a great way to evaluate, analyze, apply, etc. with regard to your teaching topic? Draw broadly from the class sources to support your conclusions and cite per APA.

    Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7). Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages. While we don’t suggest a minimum/maximum page length, your assignment length will vary based on your topic. Just make sure that you fully complete the assignment parameters mentioned above.

    *
    **Active learning/teaching strategies**

    All three class texts mentioned active learning/teaching strategies, vs. traditional lecture, which can be very passive. Here are some of the active learning strategies to which you are introduced in class:

    • Cases analysis/application

    • Examination of viewpoints

    • Devil’s advocate

    • Scenario analysis

    • Discussion technique and questions (Svinicki & McKeachie have excellent content on this as well as Brookfield; the class content on using discussion for active learning was rich in detail and suggestions)

    • Think/pair/share

    • Assumption inventory and analysis

    • Point/counter-point

    • Critical conversations protocol

    • Critical incidents exploration

    • Simulations/games, etc.

    • Questions formulation techniques

    • Peer questioning

    • Project based learning

    • Peer teaching –several strategies mentioned in the class sources

    • Team based learning—several strategies in Svinicki & McKeachie

    • Cold calling

    • Speaking in tongues

    Etc.

    **
    **Proposed teaching activities for the higher thought levels:** (several of the active learning/teaching strategies mentioned above could be developed for these possible ideas)

    **Analysis:**

    · Distinguish the strengths and weakness of a proposed therapy for X diagnosis.

    · Design a questionnaire to gather information for research on an application of a counseling theory

    · Produce support for two sides of a controversial topic in Christian counseling

    · Produce a flow chart to show critical stages of the effects of AES

    · Make a family tree to show relationships between pathologies within an extended family

    **Evaluation:**

    · Develop a list of criteria to judge the value of a new therapy for an unusual application

    · Conduct a debate about clinician choices regarding sensitive social issues in a Christian counseling setting

    · Prepare a case which illustrates the complexities of a controversial counseling topic

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 1 of 3

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343227)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343223)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343231)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343231)

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## HigherOrderThinkingSkillsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 88 to >80 pts

    Advanced

    Superbly
    includes
    assignment
    parameters
    with adequate
    support from
    class content.

    80 to >73 pts

    Proficient

    Adequately includes
    assignment parameters
    with adequate support
    from class content.

    73 to >66 pts

    Developing

    Includes most
    assignment parameters
    with some support from
    class content. Depth of
    content is marginal at
    the doctoral level of
    study.

    66 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assignment
    demonstrated
    deficits at the
    doctoral level of
    study.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    88 pts

    Writing,
    Formatting,
    and
    Citation

    37 to >33 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    writing is
    exceptionally
    clear,
    persuasive
    and error free.
    Ideas are fully
    supported and
    correctly cited
    using current
    APA
    formatting.

    33 to >30 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas are adequately
    presented; sentences
    are correctly
    constructed, and
    paragraphs are
    organized consistently
    with doctoral level
    writing.
    Writing is largely free of
    grammar, punctuation,
    and other writing errors.
    Contains any
    appropriate citations and
    APA formatting.

    30 to >27 pts

    Developing

    Student’s writing
    deviates from the
    requirements in the
    “proficient” column in
    several ways.

    27 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student’s
    writing deviates
    from the
    requirements in
    the “proficient”
    column in
    numerous
    ways.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    37 pts

    Total Points: 125

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Grading Rubric | EDCO725_D02_202530

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **## Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_Question_Te.pdf**

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Question Templates

    Recall

    Note: Any question becomes a recall
    question if the answer has already
    been explicitly provided to the student
    in class or in the text.

    When did ________ take place?

    List the ________ .

    Define the term ________.

    What is a ________?

    Who did ________?

    Name ________.

    Analysis

    How does ________ work?

    Sort these ________ .

    Use the table to determine ________ .

    Use the graph to determine ________ .

    Graph ________ .

    What caused ________ ?

    What is another possible cause of ________ ?

    Outline the ________ .

    Based on the written description, draw a
    diagram.

    Draw your own map of ________ without
    tracing or copying.

    Use the map to determine ________ .

    In what sequence did ________ happen?

    Break ________ down into its component
    parts.

    Give an example of ________ .

    What literary form is being used?

    What technique is being used?

    What information is needed?

    Is the information relevant?

    Into what groups can you organize these?

    Draw a picture that illustrates what's described
    in the story ________ .

    What does ________ symbolize?

    Find examples of [a literary device] in your
    readings.

    Analyze the ________ in ________ .

    Classify these ________ according to
    ________ .

    Separate the ________ from the ________ .

    Translate ________ .

    Analyze how ________ .

    Explain how ________ works.

    What was the author's point of view?

    How did the author convey ________ ?

    What words does the author use to paint an
    image of ________ in your mind?

    How were ________ used to ________ ?

    What kind of a ________ is this?

    Which one doesn't belong in this group?

    What is the function of ________ ?

    What is the purpose of ________ ?

    What is the relationship between ________
    and ________ ?

    What is the pattern?

    Use manipulatives to illustrate a concept.

    Build a model of ________ .

    Measure ________ .

    Comparison

    How is ________ like ________ ?

    How are ________ and ________ different?

    Compare the ________ before and after
    ________ .

    Compare the character ________ at the
    beginning of the story and at the end.

    Distinguish between ________ and
    ________ .

    Compare ________ with ________ .

    On what dimensions might you compare
    ________ and ________ ?

    Which one is the biggest/oldest/tallest?

    Inference

    Hypothesize what will happen if ________ .

    Predict what will happen if ________ .

    Apply the rule to ________ .

    Solve the problem ________ .

    Predict how the story ________ will end.

    What is the main idea of the story ________ ?

    What is the overall theme of ________ ?

    What is the moral of the story?

    Develop of plan to ________ .

    Propose and describe an invention that fills
    some need.

    Write a research paper on ________ .

    Based on your readings, what can you
    conclude about ________ ?

    What was the author's point of view?

    Solve a logic puzzle.

    What if ________ ?

    What rule applies here?

    What generalization can you make from this
    information?

    Create a ________ .

    Design a ________ .

    Propose a solution to the problem of _______
    .

    Evaluation

    Was ________ worth the costs? Explain your
    answer.

    Was the argument convincing? What makes
    you think so?

    Did ________ behave appropriately? Why?

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Write a critique of ________ .

    Was this experiment well designed? Defend
    your answer.

    Judge which is the best solution to the
    problem of ________ ? Why do you think so?

    How well are the conclusions supported by the
    data/ facts/evidence? Explain.

    Did ________ choose a wise course of
    action? Give reasons.

    Apply a scoring rubric to this piece of work.
    Explain why you are assigning each score.

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Review a book, performance, or exhibit.
    Justify your evaluation.

    Which ________ is the best? Why do you
    think so?

    Whose arguments/evidence was more
    convincing? Why?

    If you were the judge, what would your
    decision be? Why?

    Give and justify your opinion on ________ .

    **## 1-HigherOrderThinkingSkillsAssignmentInstructions125.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Higher Order Thinking Skills Assignment Instructions**

    · Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7).

    · Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages.

    · There is no suggestion of a minimum or maximum page length; length will vary based on your topic.

    · Please ensure that you fully complete the parameters mentioned below.

    **Overview**

    The week three content includes
    **_higher order thinking skills_** (HOTS) along with
    **_active learning/teaching strategies._** *

    Incorporating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is an essential component in “teaching to think” and critical for adult learning and especially graduate level learning. This exercise will give you practice in incorporating HOTS into active learning/teaching strategies for your own proposed teaching demonstration.

    **Instructions**

    In your own mind, review the highest levels of thought per Bloom and Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation_.

    Choose ONE of the critical thought levels and design a teaching activity for that thought level that would fit your own teaching topic and teaching demonstration that you will submit in the
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment**. Please note that your
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment** will require more than one active learning/teaching strategy, but you will get practice in developing one of those for this assignment.

    Use the class handout which lists sample questions and below you will find a few suggested learning activities for two levels of higher thought. An internet search will also suggest numerous other activities for the various thought levels. Please also review the explanations of several active learning strategies to which you have been introduced in all three of our class texts (below).

    So, for example, if your topic is exploring the counseling approaches used for combat veterans with PTSD, you might set up a debate to argue the strengths and weaknesses of two therapeutic approaches. Or you might introduce a case to use for a new therapeutic application and have students argue the value or disadvantages of the new therapy approach.

    In this assignment, provide adequate detail about how you would develop the learning activity. Provide the actual cases, for instance, if those are used, and suggest the penetrating questions that would guide the discussion. Justify your choice of activity. Why was your active learning strategy a great way to evaluate, analyze, apply, etc. with regard to your teaching topic? Draw broadly from the class sources to support your conclusions and cite per APA.

    Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7). Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages. While we don’t suggest a minimum/maximum page length, your assignment length will vary based on your topic. Just make sure that you fully complete the assignment parameters mentioned above.

    *
    **Active learning/teaching strategies**

    All three class texts mentioned active learning/teaching strategies, vs. traditional lecture, which can be very passive. Here are some of the active learning strategies to which you are introduced in class:

    • Cases analysis/application

    • Examination of viewpoints

    • Devil’s advocate

    • Scenario analysis

    • Discussion technique and questions (Svinicki & McKeachie have excellent content on this as well as Brookfield; the class content on using discussion for active learning was rich in detail and suggestions)

    • Think/pair/share

    • Assumption inventory and analysis

    • Point/counter-point

    • Critical conversations protocol

    • Critical incidents exploration

    • Simulations/games, etc.

    • Questions formulation techniques

    • Peer questioning

    • Project based learning

    • Peer teaching –several strategies mentioned in the class sources

    • Team based learning—several strategies in Svinicki & McKeachie

    • Cold calling

    • Speaking in tongues

    Etc.

    **
    **Proposed teaching activities for the higher thought levels:** (several of the active learning/teaching strategies mentioned above could be developed for these possible ideas)

    **Analysis:**

    · Distinguish the strengths and weakness of a proposed therapy for X diagnosis.

    · Design a questionnaire to gather information for research on an application of a counseling theory

    · Produce support for two sides of a controversial topic in Christian counseling

    · Produce a flow chart to show critical stages of the effects of AES

    · Make a family tree to show relationships between pathologies within an extended family

    **Evaluation:**

    · Develop a list of criteria to judge the value of a new therapy for an unusual application

    · Conduct a debate about clinician choices regarding sensitive social issues in a Christian counseling setting

    · Prepare a case which illustrates the complexities of a controversial counseling topic

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 1 of 3

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343227)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343223)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343231)

    **## Video.docx**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-learning-outcomes-for-lessons?module_item_id=88097438

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter16213-224.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## Reading-SvinickiMcKeachieChapter21.pdf**

    Svinicki, M., McKeachie, W. (2014, 14th ed.). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research,
    and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN:
    9781133936794.

    **## HigherOrderThinkingSkillsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 88 to >80 pts

    Advanced

    Superbly
    includes
    assignment
    parameters
    with adequate
    support from
    class content.

    80 to >73 pts

    Proficient

    Adequately includes
    assignment parameters
    with adequate support
    from class content.

    73 to >66 pts

    Developing

    Includes most
    assignment parameters
    with some support from
    class content. Depth of
    content is marginal at
    the doctoral level of
    study.

    66 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assignment
    demonstrated
    deficits at the
    doctoral level of
    study.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    88 pts

    Writing,
    Formatting,
    and
    Citation

    37 to >33 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    writing is
    exceptionally
    clear,
    persuasive
    and error free.
    Ideas are fully
    supported and
    correctly cited
    using current
    APA
    formatting.

    33 to >30 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas are adequately
    presented; sentences
    are correctly
    constructed, and
    paragraphs are
    organized consistently
    with doctoral level
    writing.
    Writing is largely free of
    grammar, punctuation,
    and other writing errors.
    Contains any
    appropriate citations and
    APA formatting.

    30 to >27 pts

    Developing

    Student’s writing
    deviates from the
    requirements in the
    “proficient” column in
    several ways.

    27 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student’s
    writing deviates
    from the
    requirements in
    the “proficient”
    column in
    numerous
    ways.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    37 pts

    Total Points: 125

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Grading Rubric | EDCO725_D02_202530

    **## Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf**

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

    In 1956, Benjamin Bloom
    headed a group of
    educational psychologists
    who developed a
    classification of levels of
    intellectual behavior
    important in learning.
    Bloom found that over 95
    % of the test questions
    students encounter require
    them to think only at the
    lowest possible level…the
    recall of information.

    Bloom identified six
    levels within the cognitive
    domain, from the simple
    recall or recognition of
    facts, as the lowest level,
    through increasingly more
    complex and abstract
    mental levels, to the
    highest order which is
    classified as evaluation.
    Verb examples that
    represent intellectual
    activity on each level are
    listed here.

    1. Knowledge: arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, relate, recall,
    repeat, reproduce state.

    2. Comprehension: classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize,
    report, restate, review, select, translate,

    3. Application: apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice,
    schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.

    4. Analysis: analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate,
    discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.

    5. Synthesis: arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate,
    manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.

    6. Evaluation: appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate, judge, predict, rate,
    core, select, support, value, evaluate.

    BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: Sample Questions
    As teachers we tend to ask questions in the "knowledge" catagory 80% to 90% of the time. These

    questions are not bad, but using them all the time is. Try to utilize higher order level of questions. These
    questions require much more "brain power" and a more extensive and elaborate answer. Below are the six

    question categories as defined by Bloom.

    • KNOWLEDGE
    o remembering;
    o memorizing;
    o recognizing;
    o recalling identification and
    o recall of information

     Who, what, when, where, how …?
     Describe

    • COMPREHENSION
    o interpreting;
    o translating from one medium to another;
    o describing in one's own words;
    o organization and selection of facts and ideas

     Retell…
    • APPLICATION

    o problem solving;
    o applying information to produce some result;
    o use of facts, rules and principles

     How is…an example of…?
     How is…related to…?
     Why is…significant?

    • ANALYSIS
    o subdividing something to show how it is put together;
    o finding the underlying structure of a communication;
    o identifying motives;
    o separation of a whole into component parts

     What are the parts or features of…?
     Classify…according to…
     Outline/diagram…
     How does…compare/contrast with…?
     What evidence can you list for…?

    • SYNTHESIS
    o creating a unique, original product that may be in verbal form or a physical object;
    o combination of ideas to form a new whole

     What would you predict/infer from…?
     What ideas can you add to…?
     How would you create/design a new…?
     What might happen if you combined…?
     What solutions would you suggest for…?

    • EVALUATION
    o making value decisions about issues;
    o resolving controversies or differences of opinion;
    o development of opinions, judgements or decisions

     Do you agree…?
     What do you think about…?
     What is the most important…?
     Place the following in order of priority…
     How would you decide about…?
     What criteria would you use to assess…?

    For further Web-based information on Bloom's taxonomy:

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

    http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table

    Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

    Table1. Bloom's Taxonomy
    The Cognitive Process Dimension

    The Knowledge Dimension
    Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

    Factual Knowledge List Summarize Classify Order Rank Combine
    Conceptual Knowledge Describe Interpret Experiment Explain Assess Plan
    Procedural Knowledge Tabulate Predict Calculate Differentiate Conclude Compose
    Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Appropriate Use Execute Construct Achieve Action Actualize

    **## Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_Question_Te.pdf**

    Higher Order Thinking Skills Question Templates

    Recall

    Note: Any question becomes a recall
    question if the answer has already
    been explicitly provided to the student
    in class or in the text.

    When did ________ take place?

    List the ________ .

    Define the term ________.

    What is a ________?

    Who did ________?

    Name ________.

    Analysis

    How does ________ work?

    Sort these ________ .

    Use the table to determine ________ .

    Use the graph to determine ________ .

    Graph ________ .

    What caused ________ ?

    What is another possible cause of ________ ?

    Outline the ________ .

    Based on the written description, draw a
    diagram.

    Draw your own map of ________ without
    tracing or copying.

    Use the map to determine ________ .

    In what sequence did ________ happen?

    Break ________ down into its component
    parts.

    Give an example of ________ .

    What literary form is being used?

    What technique is being used?

    What information is needed?

    Is the information relevant?

    Into what groups can you organize these?

    Draw a picture that illustrates what's described
    in the story ________ .

    What does ________ symbolize?

    Find examples of [a literary device] in your
    readings.

    Analyze the ________ in ________ .

    Classify these ________ according to
    ________ .

    Separate the ________ from the ________ .

    Translate ________ .

    Analyze how ________ .

    Explain how ________ works.

    What was the author's point of view?

    How did the author convey ________ ?

    What words does the author use to paint an
    image of ________ in your mind?

    How were ________ used to ________ ?

    What kind of a ________ is this?

    Which one doesn't belong in this group?

    What is the function of ________ ?

    What is the purpose of ________ ?

    What is the relationship between ________
    and ________ ?

    What is the pattern?

    Use manipulatives to illustrate a concept.

    Build a model of ________ .

    Measure ________ .

    Comparison

    How is ________ like ________ ?

    How are ________ and ________ different?

    Compare the ________ before and after
    ________ .

    Compare the character ________ at the
    beginning of the story and at the end.

    Distinguish between ________ and
    ________ .

    Compare ________ with ________ .

    On what dimensions might you compare
    ________ and ________ ?

    Which one is the biggest/oldest/tallest?

    Inference

    Hypothesize what will happen if ________ .

    Predict what will happen if ________ .

    Apply the rule to ________ .

    Solve the problem ________ .

    Predict how the story ________ will end.

    What is the main idea of the story ________ ?

    What is the overall theme of ________ ?

    What is the moral of the story?

    Develop of plan to ________ .

    Propose and describe an invention that fills
    some need.

    Write a research paper on ________ .

    Based on your readings, what can you
    conclude about ________ ?

    What was the author's point of view?

    Solve a logic puzzle.

    What if ________ ?

    What rule applies here?

    What generalization can you make from this
    information?

    Create a ________ .

    Design a ________ .

    Propose a solution to the problem of _______
    .

    Evaluation

    Was ________ worth the costs? Explain your
    answer.

    Was the argument convincing? What makes
    you think so?

    Did ________ behave appropriately? Why?

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Write a critique of ________ .

    Was this experiment well designed? Defend
    your answer.

    Judge which is the best solution to the
    problem of ________ ? Why do you think so?

    How well are the conclusions supported by the
    data/ facts/evidence? Explain.

    Did ________ choose a wise course of
    action? Give reasons.

    Apply a scoring rubric to this piece of work.
    Explain why you are assigning each score.

    What would you have done in this situation?
    Why?

    Review a book, performance, or exhibit.
    Justify your evaluation.

    Which ________ is the best? Why do you
    think so?

    Whose arguments/evidence was more
    convincing? Why?

    If you were the judge, what would your
    decision be? Why?

    Give and justify your opinion on ________ .

    **## 1-HigherOrderThinkingSkillsAssignmentInstructions125.docx**

    EDCO 725

    **Higher Order Thinking Skills Assignment Instructions**

    · Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7).

    · Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages.

    · There is no suggestion of a minimum or maximum page length; length will vary based on your topic.

    · Please ensure that you fully complete the parameters mentioned below.

    **Overview**

    The week three content includes
    **_higher order thinking skills_** (HOTS) along with
    **_active learning/teaching strategies._** *

    Incorporating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is an essential component in “teaching to think” and critical for adult learning and especially graduate level learning. This exercise will give you practice in incorporating HOTS into active learning/teaching strategies for your own proposed teaching demonstration.

    **Instructions**

    In your own mind, review the highest levels of thought per Bloom and Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy—
    _application, analysis, evaluation, creation_.

    Choose ONE of the critical thought levels and design a teaching activity for that thought level that would fit your own teaching topic and teaching demonstration that you will submit in the
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment**. Please note that your
    **Class Project: Teaching Demonstration Assignment** will require more than one active learning/teaching strategy, but you will get practice in developing one of those for this assignment.

    Use the class handout which lists sample questions and below you will find a few suggested learning activities for two levels of higher thought. An internet search will also suggest numerous other activities for the various thought levels. Please also review the explanations of several active learning strategies to which you have been introduced in all three of our class texts (below).

    So, for example, if your topic is exploring the counseling approaches used for combat veterans with PTSD, you might set up a debate to argue the strengths and weaknesses of two therapeutic approaches. Or you might introduce a case to use for a new therapeutic application and have students argue the value or disadvantages of the new therapy approach.

    In this assignment, provide adequate detail about how you would develop the learning activity. Provide the actual cases, for instance, if those are used, and suggest the penetrating questions that would guide the discussion. Justify your choice of activity. Why was your active learning strategy a great way to evaluate, analyze, apply, etc. with regard to your teaching topic? Draw broadly from the class sources to support your conclusions and cite per APA.

    Present the assignment in a formal APA paper (APA 7). Historically, page lengths have varied from a few pages to 10-15 pages. While we don’t suggest a minimum/maximum page length, your assignment length will vary based on your topic. Just make sure that you fully complete the assignment parameters mentioned above.

    *
    **Active learning/teaching strategies**

    All three class texts mentioned active learning/teaching strategies, vs. traditional lecture, which can be very passive. Here are some of the active learning strategies to which you are introduced in class:

    • Cases analysis/application

    • Examination of viewpoints

    • Devil’s advocate

    • Scenario analysis

    • Discussion technique and questions (Svinicki & McKeachie have excellent content on this as well as Brookfield; the class content on using discussion for active learning was rich in detail and suggestions)

    • Think/pair/share

    • Assumption inventory and analysis

    • Point/counter-point

    • Critical conversations protocol

    • Critical incidents exploration

    • Simulations/games, etc.

    • Questions formulation techniques

    • Peer questioning

    • Project based learning

    • Peer teaching –several strategies mentioned in the class sources

    • Team based learning—several strategies in Svinicki & McKeachie

    • Cold calling

    • Speaking in tongues

    Etc.

    **
    **Proposed teaching activities for the higher thought levels:** (several of the active learning/teaching strategies mentioned above could be developed for these possible ideas)

    **Analysis:**

    · Distinguish the strengths and weakness of a proposed therapy for X diagnosis.

    · Design a questionnaire to gather information for research on an application of a counseling theory

    · Produce support for two sides of a controversial topic in Christian counseling

    · Produce a flow chart to show critical stages of the effects of AES

    · Make a family tree to show relationships between pathologies within an extended family

    **Evaluation:**

    · Develop a list of criteria to judge the value of a new therapy for an unusual application

    · Conduct a debate about clinician choices regarding sensitive social issues in a Christian counseling setting

    · Prepare a case which illustrates the complexities of a controversial counseling topic

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 1 of 3

    **AndersonandKrathwohlActionVerbs.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/andersonandkrathwohlactionverbs-docx-10343227)

    **ActiveLearningStrategiestoPromote.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/activelearningstrategiestopromote-pdf-10343223)

    **QuestionstoUsewithBloomsTaxonomy.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questionstousewithbloomstaxonomy-docx-10343231)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7
    – 8
    – 9
    – 10

  • [Solved] replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    90 words each, no citation \ ReplyAshleyD1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replyashleyd1-png "ReplyAshleyD1.PNG") \ ReplytoIndiaD2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replytoindiad2-png "ReplytoIndiaD2.PNG") \ ReplyMorganD1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replymorgand1-png "ReplyMor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    90 words each, no citation
    \
    ReplyAshleyD1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replyashleyd1-png "ReplyAshleyD1.PNG")
    \
    ReplytoIndiaD2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replytoindiad2-png "ReplytoIndiaD2.PNG")
    \
    ReplyMorganD1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replymorgand1-png "ReplyMorganD1.PNG")
    \
    ReplyCharityD1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replycharityd1-png "ReplyCharityD1.PNG")
    \
    ReplytoCoreyD2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replytocoreyd2-png "ReplytoCoreyD2.PNG")

  • [Solved] assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf – Assessmentdescription.PNG **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf** Literature Review Revision – Rubric Summary of existing literature 72 points Criteria Description Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf

    – Assessmentdescription.PNG

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 2000 words Cultural Background

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Due 7/13 5pm EST APA 7TH PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS – ## CulturalBackgroundPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx **## CulturalBackgroundPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx** COUC 504 **Cultural Background Paper Assignment Instructions** Overview In this paper, you will describe the background of your parent…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Due 7/13  5pm EST
    APA 7TH PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS

    – ## CulturalBackgroundPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## CulturalBackgroundPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    COUC 504

    **Cultural Background Paper Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    In this paper,
    you will describe the background of your parents or primary caregivers in regard to family culture and how this background impacts you both personally and professionally as a counselor. If you have a multi-racial background,
    pick the 2 most predominant cultures represented from your family background. You will consider how your cultural background influenced the family system patterns found in your family of origin, your identity development, and the role of culture and social justice in your counseling theoretical perspective. Specifically, you will look at some of the research describing people from your background, explore internet resources related to your culture, and interview your parents/significant care givers or other significant family members to get information. Below you will find further information.

    Instructions

    Please utilize the guidelines noted below in completing this assignment:

    · This paper should be around 2000 words. Please note that the quality of your answer is important, and use the approximate words count noted in each section (#1 – #4) as you craft your responses for each section.

    · Please use the current APA style which is the 7th edition of the APA publication manual that includes information on appropriate formatting for section headings, levels of section headings, in-text citations (narrative and parenthetical), and references. In addition, review the sample professional paper for further specifics on APA formatting. For more information on APA formatting and sample papers, use
    **APA Format Quick Guide** located in the
    **Cultural Background Paper Resource** section.

    · Scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources are required and must be published within the last 5 years. A minimum of five scholarly (5) sources are required for this assignment, and you are welcome to use more as needed in your research.

    · Acceptable scholarly sources include journal articles, scholarly websites, relevant chapters from the McGoldrick et al. supplemental e-book. (E-book link for McGoldrick et al. located in syllabus.) NOTE: The Hays and Erford can be used as one of required sources.

    · In addition to the five (5) scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources, a minimum of two (2) Internet/media sources related to your culture should be utilized. These can include (but not limited to) periodical websites (newspapers, magazine) and organizational websites. (Online journal databases would be scholarly sources and not internet/media sources.)

    · First person may be used in this paper.

    ·
    **For clarification, the Cultural Background Paper is not a focus on your family history, family genealogy, or family biography, but rather a focus on your cultural identity as it relates to the questions you will address in the assignment.**

    For the two parts of this assignment, address the following prompts, and organize the paper based on the prompts using appropriate section heading and sub-section heading format:

    **Cultural Background Paper**

    1. Identify 1 or 2 predominant cultures represented from your family background. You may describe your culture(s) by discussing the following: (approximately 750 words)

    · Personal background and identity (your background may include a single heritage or multiple heritages (e.g., multiracial, multiethnic); you may choose to include information about one or all; include the ones that have had the most influence if not all).

    · When and how did you first become aware of your cultural background, and how did you respond to this (e.g., your specific group(s) and its impact on you of this awareness of being part of a specific or multiple groups)?

    · Prominent customs, practices, values, and behaviors to your family’s background (communication patterns, gender roles, marital roles, educational and vocational pursuits). The McGoldrick et al. (2005) textbook is a strongly recommended source.

    · Influence of cultural background on spirituality and/or religion as appropriate.

    · Information about your family’s cultural background not previously known (new information).

    2. Describe similarities and differences between your family of origin and other cultures whom you have encountered in the country/region where you grew up. Include a discussion of the positive AND negative experiences between you and the other cultures (approximately 250 words).

    3. Provide a clear and in-depth exploration of how your research and knowledge gained about your family’s cultural background
    **influences your perspective on the importance racial/cultural identity development for other individuals**. As part of your narrative, integrate information from at least one model from the chapter titled “Cultural Identity Development” (chapter 2) of Hays/Erford into your response (approximately 500 words).

    4. Provide a clear and in-depth exploration of how your research and knowledge gained about your family’s cultural background
    **shapes your view of conducting social justice and client advocacy for others** (approximately 500 words).

    Helpful Hints

    · The recommended McGoldrick text may have a specific chapter on your group(s) that would be helpful. Here are some examples: Students with a White background often are initially stumped with this assignment because they have not considered their cultural background before. If you are White and have a Scots-Irish background, there is a specific McGoldrick chapter on that group. White and Colonial English? There’s one on that, too. German? The same. The key is for you to discover more specifically the culture(s) of your original White roots. If you have a Latino background from Cuba, there is a specific chapter on that. Puerto Rico? The same. If you have an Asian background from Korea, there is a specific chapter on that. Japan? The same. You get the idea. The McGoldrick text has chapters on specific subcultures rather than just the generic White, Asian, and Latino categories.
    Be as specific as possible in your cultural sources. If you have a U.S. Black background, it is acceptable to use general chapters on this group. Also, consider regional areas within the United States as a possible influence towards your cultural identity. For example, an individual born and raised in the Southwestern portion of the U.S. will have a different experience than one raised in the Northeast/New England area of the U.S.

    · In addition to looking at relevant research to obtain information on your cultural background, interview available family members as they may provide useful information as you develop this paper.

    · If you are from an adopted family background, focus on the cultural background of your adoptive parents. You might be surprised at how their cultural background influenced family system patterns in the home. If you are from a foster care background, this project may be painful for you. It can also be very healing and informative. Feel free to write about the Foster Care Culture and its impact on you if it fits with your background. You can share as much or as little as you want to share in your Cultural Background Paper. Take care of yourself in the paper-writing process and keep your instructor informed about your experience.

    ·
    Do not start this paper the week it is due. Start early. You will find it helpful to let your instructor know of any problems you are experiencing so that brainstorming and problem-solving can take place. Your instructor will be limited in how they can help you in a meaningful manner if you only recognize you have a problem in the week the paper is due.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 3

    **## CulturalBackgroundPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    COUC 504

    **Cultural Background Paper Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    In this paper,
    you will describe the background of your parents or primary caregivers in regard to family culture and how this background impacts you both personally and professionally as a counselor. If you have a multi-racial background,
    pick the 2 most predominant cultures represented from your family background. You will consider how your cultural background influenced the family system patterns found in your family of origin, your identity development, and the role of culture and social justice in your counseling theoretical perspective. Specifically, you will look at some of the research describing people from your background, explore internet resources related to your culture, and interview your parents/significant care givers or other significant family members to get information. Below you will find further information.

    Instructions

    Please utilize the guidelines noted below in completing this assignment:

    · This paper should be around 2000 words. Please note that the quality of your answer is important, and use the approximate words count noted in each section (#1 – #4) as you craft your responses for each section.

    · Please use the current APA style which is the 7th edition of the APA publication manual that includes information on appropriate formatting for section headings, levels of section headings, in-text citations (narrative and parenthetical), and references. In addition, review the sample professional paper for further specifics on APA formatting. For more information on APA formatting and sample papers, use
    **APA Format Quick Guide** located in the
    **Cultural Background Paper Resource** section.

    · Scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources are required and must be published within the last 5 years. A minimum of five scholarly (5) sources are required for this assignment, and you are welcome to use more as needed in your research.

    · Acceptable scholarly sources include journal articles, scholarly websites, relevant chapters from the McGoldrick et al. supplemental e-book. (E-book link for McGoldrick et al. located in syllabus.) NOTE: The Hays and Erford can be used as one of required sources.

    · In addition to the five (5) scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources, a minimum of two (2) Internet/media sources related to your culture should be utilized. These can include (but not limited to) periodical websites (newspapers, magazine) and organizational websites. (Online journal databases would be scholarly sources and not internet/media sources.)

    · First person may be used in this paper.

    ·
    **For clarification, the Cultural Background Paper is not a focus on your family history, family genealogy, or family biography, but rather a focus on your cultural identity as it relates to the questions you will address in the assignment.**

    For the two parts of this assignment, address the following prompts, and organize the paper based on the prompts using appropriate section heading and sub-section heading format:

    **Cultural Background Paper**

    1. Identify 1 or 2 predominant cultures represented from your family background. You may describe your culture(s) by discussing the following: (approximately 750 words)

    · Personal background and identity (your background may include a single heritage or multiple heritages (e.g., multiracial, multiethnic); you may choose to include information about one or all; include the ones that have had the most influence if not all).

    · When and how did you first become aware of your cultural background, and how did you respond to this (e.g., your specific group(s) and its impact on you of this awareness of being part of a specific or multiple groups)?

    · Prominent customs, practices, values, and behaviors to your family’s background (communication patterns, gender roles, marital roles, educational and vocational pursuits). The McGoldrick et al. (2005) textbook is a strongly recommended source.

    · Influence of cultural background on spirituality and/or religion as appropriate.

    · Information about your family’s cultural background not previously known (new information).

    2. Describe similarities and differences between your family of origin and other cultures whom you have encountered in the country/region where you grew up. Include a discussion of the positive AND negative experiences between you and the other cultures (approximately 250 words).

    3. Provide a clear and in-depth exploration of how your research and knowledge gained about your family’s cultural background
    **influences your perspective on the importance racial/cultural identity development for other individuals**. As part of your narrative, integrate information from at least one model from the chapter titled “Cultural Identity Development” (chapter 2) of Hays/Erford into your response (approximately 500 words).

    4. Provide a clear and in-depth exploration of how your research and knowledge gained about your family’s cultural background
    **shapes your view of conducting social justice and client advocacy for others** (approximately 500 words).

    Helpful Hints

    · The recommended McGoldrick text may have a specific chapter on your group(s) that would be helpful. Here are some examples: Students with a White background often are initially stumped with this assignment because they have not considered their cultural background before. If you are White and have a Scots-Irish background, there is a specific McGoldrick chapter on that group. White and Colonial English? There’s one on that, too. German? The same. The key is for you to discover more specifically the culture(s) of your original White roots. If you have a Latino background from Cuba, there is a specific chapter on that. Puerto Rico? The same. If you have an Asian background from Korea, there is a specific chapter on that. Japan? The same. You get the idea. The McGoldrick text has chapters on specific subcultures rather than just the generic White, Asian, and Latino categories.
    Be as specific as possible in your cultural sources. If you have a U.S. Black background, it is acceptable to use general chapters on this group. Also, consider regional areas within the United States as a possible influence towards your cultural identity. For example, an individual born and raised in the Southwestern portion of the U.S. will have a different experience than one raised in the Northeast/New England area of the U.S.

    · In addition to looking at relevant research to obtain information on your cultural background, interview available family members as they may provide useful information as you develop this paper.

    · If you are from an adopted family background, focus on the cultural background of your adoptive parents. You might be surprised at how their cultural background influenced family system patterns in the home. If you are from a foster care background, this project may be painful for you. It can also be very healing and informative. Feel free to write about the Foster Care Culture and its impact on you if it fits with your background. You can share as much or as little as you want to share in your Cultural Background Paper. Take care of yourself in the paper-writing process and keep your instructor informed about your experience.

    ·
    Do not start this paper the week it is due. Start early. You will find it helpful to let your instructor know of any problems you are experiencing so that brainstorming and problem-solving can take place. Your instructor will be limited in how they can help you in a meaningful manner if you only recognize you have a problem in the week the paper is due.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 3