Tag: DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria & Case Formulations

  • [Solved] Annotated

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Annotated.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Psychology Discussion/Assignment/Project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please read the instructions and No AI or ChatGPT **files (2)** – ## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf – ## Week1_Assignment12.pdf **## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf**   p g g y g g stick or are you dangling a carrot? In other words, is what you are saying or doing forceful or enticing? Awareness of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please read the instructions and No AI or ChatGPT

    **files (2)**

    – ## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf

    – ## Week1_Assignment12.pdf

    **## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf**





    p g g y g g
    stick or are you dangling a carrot? In other words, is what you are saying or doing forceful or
    enticing? Awareness of everyday use of influence, and understanding characteristics of different
    forms of social influence, are important for maintaining standards of behavior in both personal and
    professional interactions.

    For this Discussion, you will recall a time when you influenced another adult’s thoughts or actions
    in a positive way. You will analyze and evaluate the aspects of influence you employed.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. Pay particular attention to the meaning and differences
    between persuasion and coercion , propaganda , and manipulation .
    Recall a situation when you influenced another adult in a positive way (e.g., addressed negative
    or harmful thinking or behavior).
    Reflect on the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult and which aspect
    of social influence (i.e., persuasion, coercion, propaganda, or manipulation), or a combination,
    most accurately characterizes your approach to the other adult.
    Consider to what degree you were aware of the type(s) of influence you were using and
    whether you would employ the same or different aspect(s) of social influence today.

    Of Week 1 post responses to the following:

    Describe the situation and the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult.
    Explain the aspect(s) of social influence most evident in your language/actions, and to what
    degree you were aware of using persuasion, coercion, propaganda, and/or manipulation at the
    time.
    Explain the outcome and your degree of success in influencing the other adult.
    Based on what you know now, explain whether you would use the same aspect(s) of social
    influence with this adult today, or what type of influence you would employ instead, and give
    your reasoning.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    BY DAY 3

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    **## Week1_Assignment12.pdf**

    Due May 31 by 10:59pm
    Points 100
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    ANALYZING PERSUASIVE
    COMMUNICATIONS

    Recall that your text defines persuasion as “an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or
    behavior” (Perloff, 2023, p. 28). For the Discussion this week, you analyzed your own approach to
    influencing another person in a positive way. You also considered whether, based on your current
    understanding of different forms of persuasion, you are comfortable with the methods you used.

    For your Assignment this week, you will continue to focus on approaches used to persuade by considering
    the ethics of persuasion and, particularly, techniques used by people in work situations. In evaluating
    specific interactions where someone influenced you (be sure you use adults as the influencer in this
    assignment), you will apply normative theories of ethics. Keep in mind that normative theories are the
    “ought to” ideas of what people ought to do based upon moral philosophy. Normative ethics involve the
    person’s character and how we judge them. Do we call them honest? Are they trustworthy?

    For this Assignment, you will analyze the four scenarios you indicted in your chart when someone
    influenced you in your everyday communications with others.

    To prepare:

    Review the Week 1 Assignment Instructions handout from the Learning Resources.
    Use the Week 1 Assignment Template document from the Learning Resources to record the persuasive
    communications you encounter in a 24-hour period. Record four entries noting when another adult

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    tried to influence you. Write the narrative to address the prompts directly under the Chart.
    Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the textbook; review also the codes of ethics that correlate most closely
    to your current work or the profession you want to enter. URLs for the codes of ethics are located in the
    Week 1 Learning Resources. This sample chart
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1) provides
    guidance for the assignment. Select one organization’s code of ethics to use in evaluating the behavior
    of the person influencing you in each communication you record. For communications that are more
    personal than professional, identify specific guidelines within the code of ethics you chose that could
    logically be used to evaluate personal interactions.
    Reflect on the entries in your completed Chart. For each entry, consider what you were thinking at the
    time and how you felt. Were the strategies used by the influencer ethical?

    Of Week 1 submit a 3- to 5-page paper that includes your completed chart, followed by your narrative that
    addresses the following.

    Use a normative theory to analyze how each person tried to influence you. Give your reasoning for
    choosing this theory.
    Use a Standard/Principle from the professional code of ethics you have selected to evaluate each of the
    four required episodes from your chart as "ethical" or "unethical" when the person tried to influence you.
    Summarize insights you have gained about persuasive communication that you would apply to your
    current job or the future work you want to do.

    Use the Assignment Template to record your chart and write your analysis directly under the Chart in a
    Word document. Be sure to rename the document following the instructions.

    Although this Assignment has elements of a personal reflection, you must also demonstrate your
    understanding of the week’s topics. Be specific and provide examples.

    Note: Support the information in your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning
    Resources, including in-text citations. Provide a reference list for all resources you use for this
    Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATIO

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_3007_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Submit chart (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Analyze by
    explaining the
    normative theory
    that best describes
    the persuader's
    intentions/behaviors
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Apply the
    professional code
    of ethics to how the
    persuader
    influenced you (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Summarize insights
    about persuasive
    communication
    related to work
    situations (20
    points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Quality of Writing
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    Information
    documentation (5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    15 pts
    A

    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).
    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    12 pts
    B

    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    10.5 pts
    C

    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    9 pts
    D

    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse
    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    0 pts
    F

    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.
    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and / or does
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Week1_Assignment12.pdf**

    Due May 31 by 10:59pm
    Points 100
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    ANALYZING PERSUASIVE
    COMMUNICATIONS

    Recall that your text defines persuasion as “an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or
    behavior” (Perloff, 2023, p. 28). For the Discussion this week, you analyzed your own approach to
    influencing another person in a positive way. You also considered whether, based on your current
    understanding of different forms of persuasion, you are comfortable with the methods you used.

    For your Assignment this week, you will continue to focus on approaches used to persuade by considering
    the ethics of persuasion and, particularly, techniques used by people in work situations. In evaluating
    specific interactions where someone influenced you (be sure you use adults as the influencer in this
    assignment), you will apply normative theories of ethics. Keep in mind that normative theories are the
    “ought to” ideas of what people ought to do based upon moral philosophy. Normative ethics involve the
    person’s character and how we judge them. Do we call them honest? Are they trustworthy?

    For this Assignment, you will analyze the four scenarios you indicted in your chart when someone
    influenced you in your everyday communications with others.

    To prepare:

    Review the Week 1 Assignment Instructions handout from the Learning Resources.
    Use the Week 1 Assignment Template document from the Learning Resources to record the persuasive
    communications you encounter in a 24-hour period. Record four entries noting when another adult

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    tried to influence you. Write the narrative to address the prompts directly under the Chart.
    Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the textbook; review also the codes of ethics that correlate most closely
    to your current work or the profession you want to enter. URLs for the codes of ethics are located in the
    Week 1 Learning Resources. This sample chart
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1) provides
    guidance for the assignment. Select one organization’s code of ethics to use in evaluating the behavior
    of the person influencing you in each communication you record. For communications that are more
    personal than professional, identify specific guidelines within the code of ethics you chose that could
    logically be used to evaluate personal interactions.
    Reflect on the entries in your completed Chart. For each entry, consider what you were thinking at the
    time and how you felt. Were the strategies used by the influencer ethical?

    Of Week 1 submit a 3- to 5-page paper that includes your completed chart, followed by your narrative that
    addresses the following.

    Use a normative theory to analyze how each person tried to influence you. Give your reasoning for
    choosing this theory.
    Use a Standard/Principle from the professional code of ethics you have selected to evaluate each of the
    four required episodes from your chart as "ethical" or "unethical" when the person tried to influence you.
    Summarize insights you have gained about persuasive communication that you would apply to your
    current job or the future work you want to do.

    Use the Assignment Template to record your chart and write your analysis directly under the Chart in a
    Word document. Be sure to rename the document following the instructions.

    Although this Assignment has elements of a personal reflection, you must also demonstrate your
    understanding of the week’s topics. Be specific and provide examples.

    Note: Support the information in your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning
    Resources, including in-text citations. Provide a reference list for all resources you use for this
    Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATIO

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_3007_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Submit chart (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Analyze by
    explaining the
    normative theory
    that best describes
    the persuader's
    intentions/behaviors
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Apply the
    professional code
    of ethics to how the
    persuader
    influenced you (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Summarize insights
    about persuasive
    communication
    related to work
    situations (20
    points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Quality of Writing
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    Information
    documentation (5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    15 pts
    A

    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).
    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    12 pts
    B

    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    10.5 pts
    C

    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    9 pts
    D

    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse
    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    0 pts
    F

    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.
    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and / or does
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf**





    p g g y g g
    stick or are you dangling a carrot? In other words, is what you are saying or doing forceful or
    enticing? Awareness of everyday use of influence, and understanding characteristics of different
    forms of social influence, are important for maintaining standards of behavior in both personal and
    professional interactions.

    For this Discussion, you will recall a time when you influenced another adult’s thoughts or actions
    in a positive way. You will analyze and evaluate the aspects of influence you employed.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. Pay particular attention to the meaning and differences
    between persuasion and coercion , propaganda , and manipulation .
    Recall a situation when you influenced another adult in a positive way (e.g., addressed negative
    or harmful thinking or behavior).
    Reflect on the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult and which aspect
    of social influence (i.e., persuasion, coercion, propaganda, or manipulation), or a combination,
    most accurately characterizes your approach to the other adult.
    Consider to what degree you were aware of the type(s) of influence you were using and
    whether you would employ the same or different aspect(s) of social influence today.

    Of Week 1 post responses to the following:

    Describe the situation and the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult.
    Explain the aspect(s) of social influence most evident in your language/actions, and to what
    degree you were aware of using persuasion, coercion, propaganda, and/or manipulation at the
    time.
    Explain the outcome and your degree of success in influencing the other adult.
    Based on what you know now, explain whether you would use the same aspect(s) of social
    influence with this adult today, or what type of influence you would employ instead, and give
    your reasoning.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    BY DAY 3

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    **## Week1_Assignment12.pdf**

    Due May 31 by 10:59pm
    Points 100
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    ANALYZING PERSUASIVE
    COMMUNICATIONS

    Recall that your text defines persuasion as “an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or
    behavior” (Perloff, 2023, p. 28). For the Discussion this week, you analyzed your own approach to
    influencing another person in a positive way. You also considered whether, based on your current
    understanding of different forms of persuasion, you are comfortable with the methods you used.

    For your Assignment this week, you will continue to focus on approaches used to persuade by considering
    the ethics of persuasion and, particularly, techniques used by people in work situations. In evaluating
    specific interactions where someone influenced you (be sure you use adults as the influencer in this
    assignment), you will apply normative theories of ethics. Keep in mind that normative theories are the
    “ought to” ideas of what people ought to do based upon moral philosophy. Normative ethics involve the
    person’s character and how we judge them. Do we call them honest? Are they trustworthy?

    For this Assignment, you will analyze the four scenarios you indicted in your chart when someone
    influenced you in your everyday communications with others.

    To prepare:

    Review the Week 1 Assignment Instructions handout from the Learning Resources.
    Use the Week 1 Assignment Template document from the Learning Resources to record the persuasive
    communications you encounter in a 24-hour period. Record four entries noting when another adult

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    tried to influence you. Write the narrative to address the prompts directly under the Chart.
    Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the textbook; review also the codes of ethics that correlate most closely
    to your current work or the profession you want to enter. URLs for the codes of ethics are located in the
    Week 1 Learning Resources. This sample chart
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1) provides
    guidance for the assignment. Select one organization’s code of ethics to use in evaluating the behavior
    of the person influencing you in each communication you record. For communications that are more
    personal than professional, identify specific guidelines within the code of ethics you chose that could
    logically be used to evaluate personal interactions.
    Reflect on the entries in your completed Chart. For each entry, consider what you were thinking at the
    time and how you felt. Were the strategies used by the influencer ethical?

    Of Week 1 submit a 3- to 5-page paper that includes your completed chart, followed by your narrative that
    addresses the following.

    Use a normative theory to analyze how each person tried to influence you. Give your reasoning for
    choosing this theory.
    Use a Standard/Principle from the professional code of ethics you have selected to evaluate each of the
    four required episodes from your chart as "ethical" or "unethical" when the person tried to influence you.
    Summarize insights you have gained about persuasive communication that you would apply to your
    current job or the future work you want to do.

    Use the Assignment Template to record your chart and write your analysis directly under the Chart in a
    Word document. Be sure to rename the document following the instructions.

    Although this Assignment has elements of a personal reflection, you must also demonstrate your
    understanding of the week’s topics. Be specific and provide examples.

    Note: Support the information in your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning
    Resources, including in-text citations. Provide a reference list for all resources you use for this
    Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATIO

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_3007_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Submit chart (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Analyze by
    explaining the
    normative theory
    that best describes
    the persuader's
    intentions/behaviors
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Apply the
    professional code
    of ethics to how the
    persuader
    influenced you (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Summarize insights
    about persuasive
    communication
    related to work
    situations (20
    points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Quality of Writing
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    Information
    documentation (5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    15 pts
    A

    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).
    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    12 pts
    B

    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    10.5 pts
    C

    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    9 pts
    D

    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse
    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    0 pts
    F

    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.
    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and / or does
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf**





    p g g y g g
    stick or are you dangling a carrot? In other words, is what you are saying or doing forceful or
    enticing? Awareness of everyday use of influence, and understanding characteristics of different
    forms of social influence, are important for maintaining standards of behavior in both personal and
    professional interactions.

    For this Discussion, you will recall a time when you influenced another adult’s thoughts or actions
    in a positive way. You will analyze and evaluate the aspects of influence you employed.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. Pay particular attention to the meaning and differences
    between persuasion and coercion , propaganda , and manipulation .
    Recall a situation when you influenced another adult in a positive way (e.g., addressed negative
    or harmful thinking or behavior).
    Reflect on the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult and which aspect
    of social influence (i.e., persuasion, coercion, propaganda, or manipulation), or a combination,
    most accurately characterizes your approach to the other adult.
    Consider to what degree you were aware of the type(s) of influence you were using and
    whether you would employ the same or different aspect(s) of social influence today.

    Of Week 1 post responses to the following:

    Describe the situation and the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult.
    Explain the aspect(s) of social influence most evident in your language/actions, and to what
    degree you were aware of using persuasion, coercion, propaganda, and/or manipulation at the
    time.
    Explain the outcome and your degree of success in influencing the other adult.
    Based on what you know now, explain whether you would use the same aspect(s) of social
    influence with this adult today, or what type of influence you would employ instead, and give
    your reasoning.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    BY DAY 3

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    **## Week1_Assignment12.pdf**

    Due May 31 by 10:59pm
    Points 100
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    ANALYZING PERSUASIVE
    COMMUNICATIONS

    Recall that your text defines persuasion as “an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or
    behavior” (Perloff, 2023, p. 28). For the Discussion this week, you analyzed your own approach to
    influencing another person in a positive way. You also considered whether, based on your current
    understanding of different forms of persuasion, you are comfortable with the methods you used.

    For your Assignment this week, you will continue to focus on approaches used to persuade by considering
    the ethics of persuasion and, particularly, techniques used by people in work situations. In evaluating
    specific interactions where someone influenced you (be sure you use adults as the influencer in this
    assignment), you will apply normative theories of ethics. Keep in mind that normative theories are the
    “ought to” ideas of what people ought to do based upon moral philosophy. Normative ethics involve the
    person’s character and how we judge them. Do we call them honest? Are they trustworthy?

    For this Assignment, you will analyze the four scenarios you indicted in your chart when someone
    influenced you in your everyday communications with others.

    To prepare:

    Review the Week 1 Assignment Instructions handout from the Learning Resources.
    Use the Week 1 Assignment Template document from the Learning Resources to record the persuasive
    communications you encounter in a 24-hour period. Record four entries noting when another adult

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)

    tried to influence you. Write the narrative to address the prompts directly under the Chart.
    Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the textbook; review also the codes of ethics that correlate most closely
    to your current work or the profession you want to enter. URLs for the codes of ethics are located in the
    Week 1 Learning Resources. This sample chart
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1) provides
    guidance for the assignment. Select one organization’s code of ethics to use in evaluating the behavior
    of the person influencing you in each communication you record. For communications that are more
    personal than professional, identify specific guidelines within the code of ethics you chose that could
    logically be used to evaluate personal interactions.
    Reflect on the entries in your completed Chart. For each entry, consider what you were thinking at the
    time and how you felt. Were the strategies used by the influencer ethical?

    Of Week 1 submit a 3- to 5-page paper that includes your completed chart, followed by your narrative that
    addresses the following.

    Use a normative theory to analyze how each person tried to influence you. Give your reasoning for
    choosing this theory.
    Use a Standard/Principle from the professional code of ethics you have selected to evaluate each of the
    four required episodes from your chart as "ethical" or "unethical" when the person tried to influence you.
    Summarize insights you have gained about persuasive communication that you would apply to your
    current job or the future work you want to do.

    Use the Assignment Template to record your chart and write your analysis directly under the Chart in a
    Word document. Be sure to rename the document following the instructions.

    Although this Assignment has elements of a personal reflection, you must also demonstrate your
    understanding of the week’s topics. Be specific and provide examples.

    Note: Support the information in your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning
    Resources, including in-text citations. Provide a reference list for all resources you use for this
    Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATIO

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_3007_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Submit chart (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Analyze by
    explaining the
    normative theory
    that best describes
    the persuader's
    intentions/behaviors
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Apply the
    professional code
    of ethics to how the
    persuader
    influenced you (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Summarize insights
    about persuasive
    communication
    related to work
    situations (20
    points)

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Quality of Writing
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    Information
    documentation (5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    15 pts
    A

    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).
    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    12 pts
    B

    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    10.5 pts
    C

    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    9 pts
    D

    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse
    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    0 pts
    F

    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.
    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and / or does
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

  • [Solved] Multicultural

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Multicultural.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Systems of Psychotherapy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    i need help **files (1)** – ## Week2.docx **## Week2.docx** Week 2 – Gestalt a. Discuss the primary defining features of the Gestalt approach. b. Describe some of the core techniques in this form of therapy. c. What are the strengths and limitations of this approach Compose papers using Microsoft Wo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    i need help

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week2.docx

    **## Week2.docx**

    Week 2 – Gestalt

    a. Discuss the primary defining features of the Gestalt approach.
    b. Describe some of the core techniques in this form of therapy.

    c. What are the strengths and limitations of this approach

    Compose papers using Microsoft Word.
    2. The paper should be formatted and typed using Times New Roman, 12-point font,
    double-spaced, and one-inch margins (no exceptions).
    3. Papers must be 2-3 pages in length and MUST follow APA format. (Points will be
    deducted for failure to adhere to APA guidelines.)
    4. Each paper must reference a minimum of 1 source (published books, textbook, or peer
    reviewed journal articles).
    5. You will be allowed to reference a credible website

    6. Add Coretta Fleeton to the left-hand corner of all pages except the title page.

    **## Week2.docx**

    Week 2 – Gestalt

    a. Discuss the primary defining features of the Gestalt approach.
    b. Describe some of the core techniques in this form of therapy.

    c. What are the strengths and limitations of this approach

    Compose papers using Microsoft Word.
    2. The paper should be formatted and typed using Times New Roman, 12-point font,
    double-spaced, and one-inch margins (no exceptions).
    3. Papers must be 2-3 pages in length and MUST follow APA format. (Points will be
    deducted for failure to adhere to APA guidelines.)
    4. Each paper must reference a minimum of 1 source (published books, textbook, or peer
    reviewed journal articles).
    5. You will be allowed to reference a credible website

    6. Add Coretta Fleeton to the left-hand corner of all pages except the title page.

  • [Solved] Annotated

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Annotated.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 16 slide PPT “Crisis Counseling”

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    DUE 5/24/ 26 12 PM EST Please be on time, Original Work, Follow Instruction

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    DUE 5/24/ 26  12 PM EST

    Please be on time, Original Work, Follow Instruction

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Remember to respond to Kyla and Mimi while being respectful of and sensitive to their viewpoints. Consider advancing the discussion in the following ways: – Post an article, video, or additional research to reinforce a peer's idea or challenge them to see their point from a different perspective. – …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Remember to respond to Kyla and Mimi while being respectful of and sensitive to their viewpoints. Consider advancing the discussion in the following ways:

    – Post an article, video, or additional research to reinforce a peer's idea or challenge them to see their point from a different perspective.
    – Engage in conversation with your peers around the concept of psychological studies in the
    – media.

    Kyla Post

    This week's material was really eye-opening, and I've honestly found myself being more critical of headlines from sources I usually just scroll past without a second thought. The comparison between the Crockett et al. (2008) study and the Laurance media article was a perfect example of how quickly scientific findings can get lost in translation.The authors of the peer-reviewed article were very precise in how they described their work, they used a controlled experiment called the ultimatum game to see how lowering serotonin levels affected how people responded to unfair monetary offers. What they found was that participants with depleted serotonin rejected more unfair offers, but their mood, general judgment, and reward processing stayed the same. Their conclusion was specific: serotonin seems to play a role in regulating emotion during social decision-making. That's it, no big lifestyle claims, just a carefully scoped finding.The media article, on the other hand, opened with the idea that a cheese sandwich could give you a "vital edge" in a salary negotiation, which is a pretty dramatic leap from what the study actually showed. It took one narrow, lab-controlled finding and turned it into a general recommendation about diet and behavior.If I were translating this study for a general audience, the one thing I'd make sure came through is that the study manipulated serotonin artificially in a lab, it didn'tprove that eating more tryptophan-rich foods would change how you negotiate in real life. That distinction really matters.With the current socio-political climate and the sheer volume of information we're exposed to every day, I think this is exactly why going back to the empirical source is so important. Media articles are designed to grab attention, and that often means oversimplifying or sensationalizing findings in ways that can actually mislead people. Checking the original research helps us ask the right questions, how big was the sample? What were the controls? Does the conclusion actually match what was found? Without that habit, it's really easy to walk away from an article thinking you learned something that isn't quite true. It’s unfortunate that media outlets are willing to misinform for clicks and engagement at the reader/viewer’s expense.

    Mimi post

    Scholarly and popular media articles summarize research differently because they are written for different audiences. Scholarly articles are intended for researchers, students, and professionals, so they use precise academic language and include important details such as the study’s purpose, methods, sample, results, and limitations (Crockett et al., 2008). Their conclusions are usually careful and closely tied to the actual data. In contrast, popular media articles are written for the general public, so they use simpler language and focus more on the main takeaway than on the full research process. Because of this, media summaries can sometimes be broader or more dramatic, while scholarly summaries are typically more cautious and evidence-based.

    One major point I would ensure I communicate accurately to a general audience is that the study’s findings support only a specific, limited conclusion based on the conditions the researchers tested (Crockett et al., 2008). Instead of presenting the results as a broad statement about all human behavior, I would explain exactly what was measured, who participated, and what the researchers were actually able to conclude. This would help prevent readers from overgeneralizing the findings and would give them a clearer, more responsible understanding of the research.

    It is important to refer to empirical studies when claims appear in popular media because the original research provides the full context, including the methods, evidence, and limitations (Crockett et al., 2008). Media summaries can simplify or exaggerate findings, which may lead to misunderstanding. This connects to ethics because people should share psychological research accurately and responsibly, especially when it may influence public beliefs or decisions.

  • [Solved] Cultural Immersion Project Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me complete this? **files (2)** – ## Part2.pdf – ## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf **## Part2.pdf** After careful consideration, submit a brief proposal detailing: 1. the group you've selected an explanation of your choice, including perceived biases you may have that could be altere…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me complete this?

    **files (2)**

    – ## Part2.pdf

    – ## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf

    **## Part2.pdf**

    After careful consideration, submit a brief proposal detailing:
    1. the group you've selected
    an explanation of your choice, including perceived biases you may have that could be altered

    2. by your research.
    This proposal is worth 2% of your final grade. Once your instructor has approved your choice, you
    can begin.

    **## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Project

    Connect with and conduct in-depth research on a group represented in your community that
    meets the following three criteria:

    1. Constitutes a unique “culture” or clear value system,
    2. Is or has been disenfranchised or oppressed, AND
    3. You envision a potential need to know more about the group in your professional setting

    for which you are currently studying (i.e., counseling, teaching, administration). This can
    include racial/cultural, sexual identity, religious/spiritual, economic, or ability diversity.

    Project Steps

    • Step 1: Conduct in-depth research on the chosen culture/group. Search for historical
    documents, texts, videos, documentaries, musical heritage, world cinema and TV
    shows, Ted Talks, online worship services, local food establishments, etc., that will
    provide a well-rounded view of the culture or group.

    • Step 2: You will journal throughout your research, outlining all the following: 1) your
    reactions to your experiences with various mediums associated with the culture/group,
    2) your thoughts and feelings about beliefs and traditions of the culture/group, and 3)
    your thoughts and feelings about yourself in relation to your chosen culture/group.
    NOTE: This journal will be submitted with your paper.

    • Step 3: Reflect on your experiences and preconceived ideas to construct a
    comprehensive and cohesive paper outlining all you have learned about the
    culture/group. Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and
    why? What have you learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over?

    The 8-10-page paper will be a culmination of all you have learned in your cultural immersion
    experience, as well as classroom learning. Be sure to include the following headings and
    sections in your final paper and presentation upload:

    1. Identification and Description of the Population (1-2 pages long. Include credible
    research and citations to support your writing).

    2. Reflection of your Virtual/Hybrid Immersion/Research Experience (what did you
    observe/perceive, how were your pre-conceived ideas changed, what surprised you,
    what is different from your personal culture? (1-2 pages).

    3. Reaction and critical analysis of the culture (include research on culture, values, beliefs,
    and behaviors and compare to your observations/perceptions). (2-3 pages).

    4. Additional documents in the appendix: Include any pictures, quotes, symbols, or links to
    videos or music.

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Page 2 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Journal: Multiple entries
    that include detailed

    notes regarding
    reactions and reflections
    with multiple mediums

    Journal is missing or
    provides little to no

    evidence of authentic
    reactions and/or

    reflections. (0 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries, but details

    related to reactions and
    reflections to

    experiences and sources
    are limited. (5 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries that include

    detailed notes chronically
    authentic reactions and

    reflections on
    experiences and

    sources. (10 points)

    Introduction:
    Establishes historical

    background and
    defensible thesis that

    supports a logical line of
    reasoning

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing.

    (0 points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited.

    (5 points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough. (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose:
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose. (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose. (5 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused.

    (10 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development: Supports

    ideas and reflections
    using specific and

    relevant examples of
    evidence

    No or limited evidence is
    provided to support

    ideas and reflections;
    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context. (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence to support

    ideas and reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is

    unclear or
    underdeveloped but

    does support the ideas
    and reflections

    presented and is placed
    properly within the
    context. (5 points)

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed evidence to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence. (10 points)

    Conclusion: Establishes
    clear conclusion based

    upon evidence

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently. (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections. (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas.

    (10 points)

    Structure &
    Organization: Text has
    unity and coherence to
    accomplish the focused

    purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs.

    (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate.

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format.

    (10 points)

    Page 3 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Audience & Tone:
    Audience appropriate
    and consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate. (0 points)

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is
    inconsistent. (5 points)

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment. (10 points)

    Sentence Structure &
    Mechanics:

    Demonstrates varied
    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning. The

    text has few
    grammatical, spelling

    and punctuation errors

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences; Frequent
    errors in agreement,

    verb tense, spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered. (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure;

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning. (5 points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading;

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,

    and punctuation (no
    more than 3); errors do

    not interfere with
    meaning. (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage: Uses extended

    and appropriate
    vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    (0 points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used
    infrequently. (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly.

    (10 points)

    APA Format/Citations:
    Correctly uses APA style

    and formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited supporting
    sources in-text; contains
    multiple errors in APA

    format. (0 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present.
    (5 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate.

    (10 points)

    – Cultural Immersion Project
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Project

    Connect with and conduct in-depth research on a group represented in your community that
    meets the following three criteria:

    1. Constitutes a unique “culture” or clear value system,
    2. Is or has been disenfranchised or oppressed, AND
    3. You envision a potential need to know more about the group in your professional setting

    for which you are currently studying (i.e., counseling, teaching, administration). This can
    include racial/cultural, sexual identity, religious/spiritual, economic, or ability diversity.

    Project Steps

    • Step 1: Conduct in-depth research on the chosen culture/group. Search for historical
    documents, texts, videos, documentaries, musical heritage, world cinema and TV
    shows, Ted Talks, online worship services, local food establishments, etc., that will
    provide a well-rounded view of the culture or group.

    • Step 2: You will journal throughout your research, outlining all the following: 1) your
    reactions to your experiences with various mediums associated with the culture/group,
    2) your thoughts and feelings about beliefs and traditions of the culture/group, and 3)
    your thoughts and feelings about yourself in relation to your chosen culture/group.
    NOTE: This journal will be submitted with your paper.

    • Step 3: Reflect on your experiences and preconceived ideas to construct a
    comprehensive and cohesive paper outlining all you have learned about the
    culture/group. Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and
    why? What have you learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over?

    The 8-10-page paper will be a culmination of all you have learned in your cultural immersion
    experience, as well as classroom learning. Be sure to include the following headings and
    sections in your final paper and presentation upload:

    1. Identification and Description of the Population (1-2 pages long. Include credible
    research and citations to support your writing).

    2. Reflection of your Virtual/Hybrid Immersion/Research Experience (what did you
    observe/perceive, how were your pre-conceived ideas changed, what surprised you,
    what is different from your personal culture? (1-2 pages).

    3. Reaction and critical analysis of the culture (include research on culture, values, beliefs,
    and behaviors and compare to your observations/perceptions). (2-3 pages).

    4. Additional documents in the appendix: Include any pictures, quotes, symbols, or links to
    videos or music.

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Page 2 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Journal: Multiple entries
    that include detailed

    notes regarding
    reactions and reflections
    with multiple mediums

    Journal is missing or
    provides little to no

    evidence of authentic
    reactions and/or

    reflections. (0 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries, but details

    related to reactions and
    reflections to

    experiences and sources
    are limited. (5 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries that include

    detailed notes chronically
    authentic reactions and

    reflections on
    experiences and

    sources. (10 points)

    Introduction:
    Establishes historical

    background and
    defensible thesis that

    supports a logical line of
    reasoning

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing.

    (0 points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited.

    (5 points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough. (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose:
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose. (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose. (5 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused.

    (10 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development: Supports

    ideas and reflections
    using specific and

    relevant examples of
    evidence

    No or limited evidence is
    provided to support

    ideas and reflections;
    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context. (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence to support

    ideas and reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is

    unclear or
    underdeveloped but

    does support the ideas
    and reflections

    presented and is placed
    properly within the
    context. (5 points)

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed evidence to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence. (10 points)

    Conclusion: Establishes
    clear conclusion based

    upon evidence

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently. (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections. (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas.

    (10 points)

    Structure &
    Organization: Text has
    unity and coherence to
    accomplish the focused

    purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs.

    (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate.

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format.

    (10 points)

    Page 3 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Audience & Tone:
    Audience appropriate
    and consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate. (0 points)

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is
    inconsistent. (5 points)

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment. (10 points)

    Sentence Structure &
    Mechanics:

    Demonstrates varied
    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning. The

    text has few
    grammatical, spelling

    and punctuation errors

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences; Frequent
    errors in agreement,

    verb tense, spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered. (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure;

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning. (5 points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading;

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,

    and punctuation (no
    more than 3); errors do

    not interfere with
    meaning. (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage: Uses extended

    and appropriate
    vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    (0 points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used
    infrequently. (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly.

    (10 points)

    APA Format/Citations:
    Correctly uses APA style

    and formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited supporting
    sources in-text; contains
    multiple errors in APA

    format. (0 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present.
    (5 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate.

    (10 points)

    – Cultural Immersion Project
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## Part2.pdf**

    After careful consideration, submit a brief proposal detailing:
    1. the group you've selected
    an explanation of your choice, including perceived biases you may have that could be altered

    2. by your research.
    This proposal is worth 2% of your final grade. Once your instructor has approved your choice, you
    can begin.

    **## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Project

    Connect with and conduct in-depth research on a group represented in your community that
    meets the following three criteria:

    1. Constitutes a unique “culture” or clear value system,
    2. Is or has been disenfranchised or oppressed, AND
    3. You envision a potential need to know more about the group in your professional setting

    for which you are currently studying (i.e., counseling, teaching, administration). This can
    include racial/cultural, sexual identity, religious/spiritual, economic, or ability diversity.

    Project Steps

    • Step 1: Conduct in-depth research on the chosen culture/group. Search for historical
    documents, texts, videos, documentaries, musical heritage, world cinema and TV
    shows, Ted Talks, online worship services, local food establishments, etc., that will
    provide a well-rounded view of the culture or group.

    • Step 2: You will journal throughout your research, outlining all the following: 1) your
    reactions to your experiences with various mediums associated with the culture/group,
    2) your thoughts and feelings about beliefs and traditions of the culture/group, and 3)
    your thoughts and feelings about yourself in relation to your chosen culture/group.
    NOTE: This journal will be submitted with your paper.

    • Step 3: Reflect on your experiences and preconceived ideas to construct a
    comprehensive and cohesive paper outlining all you have learned about the
    culture/group. Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and
    why? What have you learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over?

    The 8-10-page paper will be a culmination of all you have learned in your cultural immersion
    experience, as well as classroom learning. Be sure to include the following headings and
    sections in your final paper and presentation upload:

    1. Identification and Description of the Population (1-2 pages long. Include credible
    research and citations to support your writing).

    2. Reflection of your Virtual/Hybrid Immersion/Research Experience (what did you
    observe/perceive, how were your pre-conceived ideas changed, what surprised you,
    what is different from your personal culture? (1-2 pages).

    3. Reaction and critical analysis of the culture (include research on culture, values, beliefs,
    and behaviors and compare to your observations/perceptions). (2-3 pages).

    4. Additional documents in the appendix: Include any pictures, quotes, symbols, or links to
    videos or music.

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Page 2 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Journal: Multiple entries
    that include detailed

    notes regarding
    reactions and reflections
    with multiple mediums

    Journal is missing or
    provides little to no

    evidence of authentic
    reactions and/or

    reflections. (0 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries, but details

    related to reactions and
    reflections to

    experiences and sources
    are limited. (5 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries that include

    detailed notes chronically
    authentic reactions and

    reflections on
    experiences and

    sources. (10 points)

    Introduction:
    Establishes historical

    background and
    defensible thesis that

    supports a logical line of
    reasoning

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing.

    (0 points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited.

    (5 points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough. (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose:
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose. (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose. (5 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused.

    (10 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development: Supports

    ideas and reflections
    using specific and

    relevant examples of
    evidence

    No or limited evidence is
    provided to support

    ideas and reflections;
    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context. (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence to support

    ideas and reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is

    unclear or
    underdeveloped but

    does support the ideas
    and reflections

    presented and is placed
    properly within the
    context. (5 points)

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed evidence to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence. (10 points)

    Conclusion: Establishes
    clear conclusion based

    upon evidence

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently. (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections. (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas.

    (10 points)

    Structure &
    Organization: Text has
    unity and coherence to
    accomplish the focused

    purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs.

    (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate.

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format.

    (10 points)

    Page 3 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Audience & Tone:
    Audience appropriate
    and consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate. (0 points)

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is
    inconsistent. (5 points)

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment. (10 points)

    Sentence Structure &
    Mechanics:

    Demonstrates varied
    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning. The

    text has few
    grammatical, spelling

    and punctuation errors

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences; Frequent
    errors in agreement,

    verb tense, spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered. (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure;

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning. (5 points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading;

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,

    and punctuation (no
    more than 3); errors do

    not interfere with
    meaning. (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage: Uses extended

    and appropriate
    vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    (0 points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used
    infrequently. (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly.

    (10 points)

    APA Format/Citations:
    Correctly uses APA style

    and formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited supporting
    sources in-text; contains
    multiple errors in APA

    format. (0 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present.
    (5 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate.

    (10 points)

    – Cultural Immersion Project
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## Part2.pdf**

    After careful consideration, submit a brief proposal detailing:
    1. the group you've selected
    an explanation of your choice, including perceived biases you may have that could be altered

    2. by your research.
    This proposal is worth 2% of your final grade. Once your instructor has approved your choice, you
    can begin.

    **## CulturalImmersionProject.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Project

    Connect with and conduct in-depth research on a group represented in your community that
    meets the following three criteria:

    1. Constitutes a unique “culture” or clear value system,
    2. Is or has been disenfranchised or oppressed, AND
    3. You envision a potential need to know more about the group in your professional setting

    for which you are currently studying (i.e., counseling, teaching, administration). This can
    include racial/cultural, sexual identity, religious/spiritual, economic, or ability diversity.

    Project Steps

    • Step 1: Conduct in-depth research on the chosen culture/group. Search for historical
    documents, texts, videos, documentaries, musical heritage, world cinema and TV
    shows, Ted Talks, online worship services, local food establishments, etc., that will
    provide a well-rounded view of the culture or group.

    • Step 2: You will journal throughout your research, outlining all the following: 1) your
    reactions to your experiences with various mediums associated with the culture/group,
    2) your thoughts and feelings about beliefs and traditions of the culture/group, and 3)
    your thoughts and feelings about yourself in relation to your chosen culture/group.
    NOTE: This journal will be submitted with your paper.

    • Step 3: Reflect on your experiences and preconceived ideas to construct a
    comprehensive and cohesive paper outlining all you have learned about the
    culture/group. Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and
    why? What have you learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over?

    The 8-10-page paper will be a culmination of all you have learned in your cultural immersion
    experience, as well as classroom learning. Be sure to include the following headings and
    sections in your final paper and presentation upload:

    1. Identification and Description of the Population (1-2 pages long. Include credible
    research and citations to support your writing).

    2. Reflection of your Virtual/Hybrid Immersion/Research Experience (what did you
    observe/perceive, how were your pre-conceived ideas changed, what surprised you,
    what is different from your personal culture? (1-2 pages).

    3. Reaction and critical analysis of the culture (include research on culture, values, beliefs,
    and behaviors and compare to your observations/perceptions). (2-3 pages).

    4. Additional documents in the appendix: Include any pictures, quotes, symbols, or links to
    videos or music.

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Page 2 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Journal: Multiple entries
    that include detailed

    notes regarding
    reactions and reflections
    with multiple mediums

    Journal is missing or
    provides little to no

    evidence of authentic
    reactions and/or

    reflections. (0 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries, but details

    related to reactions and
    reflections to

    experiences and sources
    are limited. (5 points)

    Journal includes multiple
    entries that include

    detailed notes chronically
    authentic reactions and

    reflections on
    experiences and

    sources. (10 points)

    Introduction:
    Establishes historical

    background and
    defensible thesis that

    supports a logical line of
    reasoning

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing.

    (0 points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited.

    (5 points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough. (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose:
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose. (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose. (5 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused.

    (10 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development: Supports

    ideas and reflections
    using specific and

    relevant examples of
    evidence

    No or limited evidence is
    provided to support

    ideas and reflections;
    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context. (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence to support

    ideas and reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is

    unclear or
    underdeveloped but

    does support the ideas
    and reflections

    presented and is placed
    properly within the
    context. (5 points)

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed evidence to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of evidence is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence. (10 points)

    Conclusion: Establishes
    clear conclusion based

    upon evidence

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently. (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections. (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas.

    (10 points)

    Structure &
    Organization: Text has
    unity and coherence to
    accomplish the focused

    purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs.

    (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate.

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format.

    (10 points)

    Page 3 of 3

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    Audience & Tone:
    Audience appropriate
    and consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate. (0 points)

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is
    inconsistent. (5 points)

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment. (10 points)

    Sentence Structure &
    Mechanics:

    Demonstrates varied
    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning. The

    text has few
    grammatical, spelling

    and punctuation errors

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences; Frequent
    errors in agreement,

    verb tense, spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered. (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure;

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning. (5 points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading;

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,

    and punctuation (no
    more than 3); errors do

    not interfere with
    meaning. (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage: Uses extended

    and appropriate
    vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    (0 points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used
    infrequently. (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly.

    (10 points)

    APA Format/Citations:
    Correctly uses APA style

    and formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited supporting
    sources in-text; contains
    multiple errors in APA

    format. (0 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present.
    (5 points)

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate.

    (10 points)

    – Cultural Immersion Project
    – Scoring Guidelines

  • [Solved] W7 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This is a two-part discussion question (part one pertaining to olfaction and part two pertaining to taste) and both parts must be answered. Discuss the components of the olfactory system: the olfactory receptors, the olfactory sensory neurons, the olfactory bulb and the cortex. Then, discuss what ki…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This is a two-part discussion question (part one pertaining to olfaction and part two pertaining to taste) and both parts must be answered. Discuss the components of the olfactory system: the olfactory receptors, the olfactory sensory neurons, the olfactory bulb and the cortex.

    Then, discuss what kinds of evidence support the idea that different people may have different taste experiences. What mechanisms might be responsible for these differences?

    Lastly, explain the role of culture in the development of smell and taste and provide two examples of how culture could account for variation in perception.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qr5hGBygqo

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QT-HD2a1EM&feature=youtu.be](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QT-HD2a1EM&feature=youtu.be)

  • [Solved] D2-Research Plan Overview: Introduction Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    FOLLOW INSTRUCTION UPLOADED APA Style 7ed 250 words at least 2 references **files (4)** – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc – ## VIDEOS.docx – ## APALogin.docx – Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc** [removed] **## VIDEOS.docx** **VIDEOS** [https://canvas…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    FOLLOW INSTRUCTION UPLOADED

    APA Style 7ed

    250 words

    at least 2 references

    **files (4)**

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc

    – ## VIDEOS.docx

    – ## APALogin.docx

    – Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    [removed]

    **## VIDEOS.docx**

    **VIDEOS**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123)

    **## APALogin.docx**

    American Psychological Association.
    _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_ (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the
    [APA Style Manual](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstylemanual.apa.org%2Fmanual%2F0).
    **This book is provided in the course as an e-book.**

    Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters3-pdf)

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters3-pdf)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    [removed]

    **## VIDEOS.docx**

    **VIDEOS**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123)

    **## APALogin.docx**

    American Psychological Association.
    _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_ (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the
    [APA Style Manual](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstylemanual.apa.org%2Fmanual%2F0).
    **This book is provided in the course as an e-book.**

    Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters3-pdf)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    [removed]

    **## VIDEOS.docx**

    **VIDEOS**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-deep-and-wide-the-nature-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=103967123)

    **## APALogin.docx**

    American Psychological Association.
    _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_ (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the
    [APA Style Manual](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstylemanual.apa.org%2Fmanual%2F0).
    **This book is provided in the course as an e-book.**

    Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters3-pdf)