Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Activity – TQM Charting Practice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    DUE TOMORROW by 6p EST This activity consists of two problems. – ## TQMChartingPractice.txt **## TQMChartingPractice.txt** This activity consists of two problems. Problem One Dr. Raymond Hill, Director of Surgery, for Forest Medical Center in Lake Park, Illinois, received some recent statistics conc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    DUE TOMORROW by 6p EST
    This activity consists of two problems.

    – ## TQMChartingPractice.txt

    **## TQMChartingPractice.txt**

    This activity consists of two problems.
    Problem One
    Dr. Raymond Hill, Director of Surgery, for Forest Medical Center in Lake Park, Illinois, received some recent statistics concerning data on the surgeries performed in his center during 2019. He was somewhat surprised to see the high number of what is classified as "late surgeries." He has asked you, a quality analyst, to examine this data.
    He requests the following items from you:
    1. Create a scatter plot in Excel of the number of late surgeries versus the overall number of surgeries.
    2. Create a run chart in Excel for the number of late surgeries and a run chart for the overall number of surgeries for 2019.
    3. Create separate control charts in Excel for the number of late surgeries and the overall number of surgeries with a 95% confidence level. Show all calculations that you use to arrive at these control charts.
    4. In a Word document, draw two conclusions regarding these three analyses regarding the late surgeries at Forest Medical Center.
    Late Surgeries versus Overall Surgeries
    Month Number of Surgeries Number of Late Surgeries
    January 435 112
    February 401 129
    March 572 186
    April 409 103
    May 577 89
    June 329 156
    July 467 156
    August 301 94
    September 235 89
    October 325 127
    November 378 156
    December 444 124
    Total 4873 1432
    Problem Two
    Dr. Amanda Guzik, head of infectious diseases for Forest Medical Center in Lake Park Illinois, asks you to analyze the following influenza data that she has collected over five years from cases that were treated at this medical center.
    1. Use Excel to create a run chart for the data.
    2. Use Excel to create a control chart with a 95% confidence level for this data. Include the mean, the LCL, and the UCL. Show all calculations that you use to arrive at these control charts.
    3. In a Word document, draw two conclusions from these charts regarding the influenza cases that the Forest Medical Center had treated.
    Submit Word document(s) and Excel file(s) showing your responses and calculations.
    Influenza Data by Quarter
    Year Quarter # of Cases of Influenza Observed
    1 1 3452
    1 2 346
    1 3 483
    1 4 3984
    2 1 4120
    2 2 376
    2 3 429
    2 4 3583
    3 1 4219
    3 2 385
    3 3 392
    3 4 3614
    4 1 3568
    4 2 439
    4 3 326
    4 4 4103
    5 1 4209
    5 2 396
    5 3 411
    5 4 4008

    **## TQMChartingPractice.txt**

    This activity consists of two problems.
    Problem One
    Dr. Raymond Hill, Director of Surgery, for Forest Medical Center in Lake Park, Illinois, received some recent statistics concerning data on the surgeries performed in his center during 2019. He was somewhat surprised to see the high number of what is classified as "late surgeries." He has asked you, a quality analyst, to examine this data.
    He requests the following items from you:
    1. Create a scatter plot in Excel of the number of late surgeries versus the overall number of surgeries.
    2. Create a run chart in Excel for the number of late surgeries and a run chart for the overall number of surgeries for 2019.
    3. Create separate control charts in Excel for the number of late surgeries and the overall number of surgeries with a 95% confidence level. Show all calculations that you use to arrive at these control charts.
    4. In a Word document, draw two conclusions regarding these three analyses regarding the late surgeries at Forest Medical Center.
    Late Surgeries versus Overall Surgeries
    Month Number of Surgeries Number of Late Surgeries
    January 435 112
    February 401 129
    March 572 186
    April 409 103
    May 577 89
    June 329 156
    July 467 156
    August 301 94
    September 235 89
    October 325 127
    November 378 156
    December 444 124
    Total 4873 1432
    Problem Two
    Dr. Amanda Guzik, head of infectious diseases for Forest Medical Center in Lake Park Illinois, asks you to analyze the following influenza data that she has collected over five years from cases that were treated at this medical center.
    1. Use Excel to create a run chart for the data.
    2. Use Excel to create a control chart with a 95% confidence level for this data. Include the mean, the LCL, and the UCL. Show all calculations that you use to arrive at these control charts.
    3. In a Word document, draw two conclusions from these charts regarding the influenza cases that the Forest Medical Center had treated.
    Submit Word document(s) and Excel file(s) showing your responses and calculations.
    Influenza Data by Quarter
    Year Quarter # of Cases of Influenza Observed
    1 1 3452
    1 2 346
    1 3 483
    1 4 3984
    2 1 4120
    2 2 376
    2 3 429
    2 4 3583
    3 1 4219
    3 2 385
    3 3 392
    3 4 3614
    4 1 3568
    4 2 439
    4 3 326
    4 4 4103
    5 1 4209
    5 2 396
    5 3 411
    5 4 4008

  • [Solved] week 3 theory eval

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering week 3 theory eval.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] PSY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering PSY.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 599 A-3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf – ## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf** JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone Assignment 3 © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Stray…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf

    – ## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf**

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 1 of 3

    Assignment 3: Overview of the Strategic Plan
    Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 9 (20% of Course Grade)

    Overview

    In this assignment, you create the third component of your Board Brief, an overview of your strategic plan.
    The purpose of the overview is to give Board members a preview of the key changes you will make in order
    to implement your plan, and to explain how these changes will impact the organization. This information
    enables your Board to come to the meeting better prepared and to ask more informed questions. Your
    overview must be clear and complete enough that it makes sense, but it should not be overly wordy.

    Your instructor will review your strategic plan and will provide comments and questions where needed to
    help you strengthen your presentation. You will be given these questions in advance of your presentation
    and will be expected to address them in your delivery.

    Instructions

    1. Building on your previous submissions, include an additional 3 to 4 pages to take the analysis work
    you have done in the first two assignments and turn it into an actionable plan.

    2. An effective plan overview will include:

    a. A clear and compelling opening statement (executive summary) that explains the strategic
    initiative

    b. A high-level outline of your implementation plan, including costs, impact on operations, ROI
    projections, competitive advantage, and risks associated with the plan, along with your
    mitigation plans

    c. A reminder of the challenges and opportunities facing the organization and how your
    proposed plan will address these

    d. Enough information to allow Board members to prepare for the upcoming meeting and to
    formulate additional questions

    e. A summary statement recapping why the proposed strategic initiative is necessary and
    specifying the approvals being sought at the upcoming Board meeting

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 2 of 3

    Formatting and Submission Requirements

    NOTE: Use the Board Brief Checklist in the course shell to ensure that you have included the required
    content, from each of the three assignments in this course, in your final Board Brief.

    • Submit your work in Word

    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, and
    the course title and date

    • Include a references page with your sources

    • The cover page and the references page are not included in the required page length

    • Use professional font (Times New Roman or Arial), 10-12 font size, and double-space

    • Headings are used to identify main topics and subtopics

    • Paragraphs are separated by a single space

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 3 of 3

    RUBRIC: Assignment 3

    CRITERIA

    Unsatisfactory

    Low Pass

    Pass

    High Pass

    Honors

    1. Executive
    Summary/
    Opening
    Statement

    Weight: 10%

    Executive summary
    was missing or off-
    topic

    Executive summary
    covered main points,
    but was disorganized
    or overly detailed

    Executive summary
    provided a basic
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Executive summary
    provided an excellent
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Met HP criteria plus
    displayed an
    engaging style that
    indicates a powerful
    opening that will grab
    the audience

    2. Plan Outline

    Weight: 30%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unrealistic
    explanation of the
    strategic plan

    Strategic plan was
    outlined, but lacked
    substantive rationale
    for key choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan was
    outlined; included
    basic rationale and
    information on key
    choices and actions

    Strategic plan
    included a clear and
    well-reasoned
    rationale; included
    key information on
    strategic choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan is
    justified by keen
    insight into market
    dynamics and
    competitors’
    strengths, and
    provided a viable
    solution for both
    near-term and long-
    term growth

    3. Financials

    Weight: 20%

    Performed no
    financial calculations
    or made substantive
    errors

    Financial models
    and calculations
    included minor errors
    or assumptions
    which did not
    materially impact the
    strategic plan

    Correctly performed
    all basic financial
    calculation and
    modeling

    Met Pass criteria plus
    included detailed
    calculations that
    correctly and
    accurately
    summarized the
    financial health of the
    organization

    Met HP criteria plus
    included
    comprehensive
    forward-looking
    calculations of
    payback relative to
    IRR and other key
    performance metrics

    4. Competitive
    Advantage

    Weight: 15%

    Did not identify
    impact on
    competitive strength
    or presented
    assertions not
    supported by data

    Identified potential
    impact of the
    strategic plan move
    on competitive
    advantage, but did
    not address
    sustainability of
    advantage

    Identified potential
    impact on
    competitive
    advantage and
    provided basic
    insights into the
    ability of competitors
    to match move(s)

    Clearly explained the
    sustainability of the
    move(s) and why
    competitors will not
    easily be able to
    match

    Met HP criteria plus
    offered additional
    valuable insights into
    evidence supporting
    the sustainability and
    superiority of the
    strategic plan

    5. Risk

    Weight: 15%

    Incomplete or
    unclear synopsis of
    any of the most
    important strategic
    risks

    Risk analysis was
    superficial,
    demonstrating only a
    basic understanding
    of the threats to the
    proposed strategic
    plan

    Risk analysis
    demonstrated basic
    understanding of
    risks and the upside
    opportunity relative to
    that risk

    Clearly explained
    potential for risk, risk
    impact on the
    organization, and
    plan for risk
    mitigation

    Met HP criteria plus
    explained why
    proposed plan is
    superior to other risk-
    reward options

    6. Summary

    Weight: 10%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unclear summary

    Summary was vague
    and/or failed to
    connect key
    elements of the plan

    Summary provided a
    basic recap of
    connection of key
    elements of the plan

    Summary recapped
    key elements and
    drew the Board Brief
    to a clear and
    concise close

    Met HP criteria plus
    presented an
    inspiring and
    compelling call to
    action that this is the
    plan that will take the
    organization forward

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf**

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 1 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Use this checklist as a guide when you are working on each of the first three assignments for your
    Capstone Project. It will serve as a reminder of the key content areas and the qualities of a well-written
    Board Brief. Note that the components listed below are not a direct match for each topic in your
    assignments. That is not its purpose. While the elements of an effective Board Brief are fairly consistent,
    the sequence and specific content will vary somewhat depending on circumstances.

    Board Brief Component Key Features

    Executive Summary

    Include a clear executive summary (AKA
    “elevator pitch”) for your brief. A good summary
    will help focus your audience’s attention.

    Remember, you are telling a business story not
    crafting a piece of literature. Your goal is not to
    let the story just unfold as it goes. Tell your
    audience right from the beginning where the brief
    is going and what actions you are proposing.

    Note: An Executive Summary is best written after
    the brief is fully developed in order to capture the
    most significant findings, recommendations and
    conclusions.

     Capture the big idea of what you want to say

     Frame the problem/opportunity

     State your vision for the organization and the

    context for your plan

     Outline a high-level snapshot of how your
    proposed changes will increase the
    organization’s competitive strength

     If there is an “ask” (such as a vote at the next
    meeting), make note of that in the executive
    summary so that Board members know why
    they are reading the brief

    Data

    When presenting complex information to a non-
    technical audience, you must Identify key data
    relative to the problem or opportunity. Don’t
    overwhelm your readers by providing page after
    page of numbers. This may be needed for other
    types of reports, but not for a Board Brief.

    Use good judgment in highlighting the most
    critical data in the main body of the brief. If there
    are additional data sets that include important
    information, but are likely to only be reviewed by
    a few people with specialized knowledge, include
    these in an appendix (or even in a separate
    document).

     Recap of the data you have gathered and
    analyzed

     Document the sources of the data

     Summarize and communicate the data in a
    clear and meaningful way; show how the
    data support your position

     Make good use of visuals to illustrate your
    findings

     Identify areas where data may be missing or
    incomplete; explain the impact of missing
    data on your analysis – remember, you will
    never have complete data and that’s okay,

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 2 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    The data that are most important will, of course,
    vary depending on the specific focus of the brief,
    but should include qualitative and quantitative
    data on your organization, competitors and the
    marketplace to support the strategy you are
    proposing.

    It is critical that you make good use of charts,
    tables and other visual supports to display your
    data. This will help your audience to more easily
    understand the patterns, trends and anomalies in
    the data.

    but you need to convince the Board that the
    data you do have are sufficient to make an
    informed decision

    Implementation Plan

    Craft a clear map of what will happen and when.
    This should include actionable steps that identify
    and align objectives, actions and milestones.

    Use good judgement in determining the level of
    detail to provide. Your Board will not need to
    know specific personnel decisions in every
    department or the exact specifications of a new
    piece of equipment you will be purchasing. They
    need to see a “big picture” overview of how you
    will turn your plan into a reality.

    Note: It is likely that Board members will come
    back to you with additional questions on certain
    areas of the plan. That’s okay. As you continue
    to work with your Board, you will learn where
    different members want to dig deeper, and your
    board briefs will evolve to address those needs.

     Identify key goals and the actionable steps to
    achieve your desired outcomes

     Include key milestones

     Include a (proposed) timeline for each
    milestone

     Identify personnel or organizational changes
    necessary to accomplish the plan

     If additional training will be required, include
    a high-level overview of how the training will
    be delivered

     Identify changes in infrastructure, facilities
    and major equipment purchases – Note: do
    not include the financials for these in your
    implementation overview; address these in
    your financials section

    Financials

    Your initiative is not going to get approved unless
    you can demonstrate a positive return on
    investment. In preparing for your Board
    Presentation, you must address key financial
    questions for Board such as projected revenue,
    fixed and variable costs and ROI.

     How much will it cost to implement your
    plan?

     How will you secure the necessary funds?

     When will this initiative pay for itself and start
    making money?

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 3 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Additionally, you should share data related to
    why your plan is the best use of the financial
    resources of your organization.

    Use the budgeting tools you have learned about
    including NPV, IRR, Break-Even and Payback to
    help you communicate a clear financial picture to
    your Board.

     How much profit will the company earn when
    you successfully execute the plan?

    Competitive Advantage

    Your Board will expect a clear explanation of
    what your plan will accomplish to strengthen the
    “economic moat” surrounding your business.

    Keep your synopsis at a high level and make
    sure you demonstrate how your strategy clearly
    aligns with the mission of the organization.

     How will this initiative put your company
    ahead of the competition?

     How will it create a long-term sustainable
    competitive advantage?

     What will keep your competitors from just
    copying your moves?

    Risk Mitigation

    A Board presentation from the CEO can’t be all
    about the good with none of the bad. Yes, you
    want to convince the Board that your idea is the
    right one and you are the one who can make it
    happen, but you also have a responsibility to
    educate the Board about the risks relative to the
    rewards and the steps you will take to manage
    those risks. This includes threats from outside
    the organization such as what competitors can
    do to keep you from achieving market leadership
    or forces that are impacting the larger economy.

     Summarize the risks (from inside and outside

    forces) that could undermine the success of
    you plan

     Explain to the Board how these risks have
    been assessed and how your plan offers the
    right balance of risk and reward

    Summary or Wrap-Up

    Keep it short and sweet, but pull the pieces
    together. Bringing everything back to the
    Mission is a good way to end a Board Brief.

     Include a “call to action” – this is usually a
    reminder of the request for approval being
    sought at the upcoming meeting

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf**

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 1 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Use this checklist as a guide when you are working on each of the first three assignments for your
    Capstone Project. It will serve as a reminder of the key content areas and the qualities of a well-written
    Board Brief. Note that the components listed below are not a direct match for each topic in your
    assignments. That is not its purpose. While the elements of an effective Board Brief are fairly consistent,
    the sequence and specific content will vary somewhat depending on circumstances.

    Board Brief Component Key Features

    Executive Summary

    Include a clear executive summary (AKA
    “elevator pitch”) for your brief. A good summary
    will help focus your audience’s attention.

    Remember, you are telling a business story not
    crafting a piece of literature. Your goal is not to
    let the story just unfold as it goes. Tell your
    audience right from the beginning where the brief
    is going and what actions you are proposing.

    Note: An Executive Summary is best written after
    the brief is fully developed in order to capture the
    most significant findings, recommendations and
    conclusions.

     Capture the big idea of what you want to say

     Frame the problem/opportunity

     State your vision for the organization and the

    context for your plan

     Outline a high-level snapshot of how your
    proposed changes will increase the
    organization’s competitive strength

     If there is an “ask” (such as a vote at the next
    meeting), make note of that in the executive
    summary so that Board members know why
    they are reading the brief

    Data

    When presenting complex information to a non-
    technical audience, you must Identify key data
    relative to the problem or opportunity. Don’t
    overwhelm your readers by providing page after
    page of numbers. This may be needed for other
    types of reports, but not for a Board Brief.

    Use good judgment in highlighting the most
    critical data in the main body of the brief. If there
    are additional data sets that include important
    information, but are likely to only be reviewed by
    a few people with specialized knowledge, include
    these in an appendix (or even in a separate
    document).

     Recap of the data you have gathered and
    analyzed

     Document the sources of the data

     Summarize and communicate the data in a
    clear and meaningful way; show how the
    data support your position

     Make good use of visuals to illustrate your
    findings

     Identify areas where data may be missing or
    incomplete; explain the impact of missing
    data on your analysis – remember, you will
    never have complete data and that’s okay,

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 2 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    The data that are most important will, of course,
    vary depending on the specific focus of the brief,
    but should include qualitative and quantitative
    data on your organization, competitors and the
    marketplace to support the strategy you are
    proposing.

    It is critical that you make good use of charts,
    tables and other visual supports to display your
    data. This will help your audience to more easily
    understand the patterns, trends and anomalies in
    the data.

    but you need to convince the Board that the
    data you do have are sufficient to make an
    informed decision

    Implementation Plan

    Craft a clear map of what will happen and when.
    This should include actionable steps that identify
    and align objectives, actions and milestones.

    Use good judgement in determining the level of
    detail to provide. Your Board will not need to
    know specific personnel decisions in every
    department or the exact specifications of a new
    piece of equipment you will be purchasing. They
    need to see a “big picture” overview of how you
    will turn your plan into a reality.

    Note: It is likely that Board members will come
    back to you with additional questions on certain
    areas of the plan. That’s okay. As you continue
    to work with your Board, you will learn where
    different members want to dig deeper, and your
    board briefs will evolve to address those needs.

     Identify key goals and the actionable steps to
    achieve your desired outcomes

     Include key milestones

     Include a (proposed) timeline for each
    milestone

     Identify personnel or organizational changes
    necessary to accomplish the plan

     If additional training will be required, include
    a high-level overview of how the training will
    be delivered

     Identify changes in infrastructure, facilities
    and major equipment purchases – Note: do
    not include the financials for these in your
    implementation overview; address these in
    your financials section

    Financials

    Your initiative is not going to get approved unless
    you can demonstrate a positive return on
    investment. In preparing for your Board
    Presentation, you must address key financial
    questions for Board such as projected revenue,
    fixed and variable costs and ROI.

     How much will it cost to implement your
    plan?

     How will you secure the necessary funds?

     When will this initiative pay for itself and start
    making money?

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 3 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Additionally, you should share data related to
    why your plan is the best use of the financial
    resources of your organization.

    Use the budgeting tools you have learned about
    including NPV, IRR, Break-Even and Payback to
    help you communicate a clear financial picture to
    your Board.

     How much profit will the company earn when
    you successfully execute the plan?

    Competitive Advantage

    Your Board will expect a clear explanation of
    what your plan will accomplish to strengthen the
    “economic moat” surrounding your business.

    Keep your synopsis at a high level and make
    sure you demonstrate how your strategy clearly
    aligns with the mission of the organization.

     How will this initiative put your company
    ahead of the competition?

     How will it create a long-term sustainable
    competitive advantage?

     What will keep your competitors from just
    copying your moves?

    Risk Mitigation

    A Board presentation from the CEO can’t be all
    about the good with none of the bad. Yes, you
    want to convince the Board that your idea is the
    right one and you are the one who can make it
    happen, but you also have a responsibility to
    educate the Board about the risks relative to the
    rewards and the steps you will take to manage
    those risks. This includes threats from outside
    the organization such as what competitors can
    do to keep you from achieving market leadership
    or forces that are impacting the larger economy.

     Summarize the risks (from inside and outside

    forces) that could undermine the success of
    you plan

     Explain to the Board how these risks have
    been assessed and how your plan offers the
    right balance of risk and reward

    Summary or Wrap-Up

    Keep it short and sweet, but pull the pieces
    together. Bringing everything back to the
    Mission is a good way to end a Board Brief.

     Include a “call to action” – this is usually a
    reminder of the request for approval being
    sought at the upcoming meeting

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf**

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 1 of 3

    Assignment 3: Overview of the Strategic Plan
    Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 9 (20% of Course Grade)

    Overview

    In this assignment, you create the third component of your Board Brief, an overview of your strategic plan.
    The purpose of the overview is to give Board members a preview of the key changes you will make in order
    to implement your plan, and to explain how these changes will impact the organization. This information
    enables your Board to come to the meeting better prepared and to ask more informed questions. Your
    overview must be clear and complete enough that it makes sense, but it should not be overly wordy.

    Your instructor will review your strategic plan and will provide comments and questions where needed to
    help you strengthen your presentation. You will be given these questions in advance of your presentation
    and will be expected to address them in your delivery.

    Instructions

    1. Building on your previous submissions, include an additional 3 to 4 pages to take the analysis work
    you have done in the first two assignments and turn it into an actionable plan.

    2. An effective plan overview will include:

    a. A clear and compelling opening statement (executive summary) that explains the strategic
    initiative

    b. A high-level outline of your implementation plan, including costs, impact on operations, ROI
    projections, competitive advantage, and risks associated with the plan, along with your
    mitigation plans

    c. A reminder of the challenges and opportunities facing the organization and how your
    proposed plan will address these

    d. Enough information to allow Board members to prepare for the upcoming meeting and to
    formulate additional questions

    e. A summary statement recapping why the proposed strategic initiative is necessary and
    specifying the approvals being sought at the upcoming Board meeting

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 2 of 3

    Formatting and Submission Requirements

    NOTE: Use the Board Brief Checklist in the course shell to ensure that you have included the required
    content, from each of the three assignments in this course, in your final Board Brief.

    • Submit your work in Word

    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, and
    the course title and date

    • Include a references page with your sources

    • The cover page and the references page are not included in the required page length

    • Use professional font (Times New Roman or Arial), 10-12 font size, and double-space

    • Headings are used to identify main topics and subtopics

    • Paragraphs are separated by a single space

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 3 of 3

    RUBRIC: Assignment 3

    CRITERIA

    Unsatisfactory

    Low Pass

    Pass

    High Pass

    Honors

    1. Executive
    Summary/
    Opening
    Statement

    Weight: 10%

    Executive summary
    was missing or off-
    topic

    Executive summary
    covered main points,
    but was disorganized
    or overly detailed

    Executive summary
    provided a basic
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Executive summary
    provided an excellent
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Met HP criteria plus
    displayed an
    engaging style that
    indicates a powerful
    opening that will grab
    the audience

    2. Plan Outline

    Weight: 30%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unrealistic
    explanation of the
    strategic plan

    Strategic plan was
    outlined, but lacked
    substantive rationale
    for key choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan was
    outlined; included
    basic rationale and
    information on key
    choices and actions

    Strategic plan
    included a clear and
    well-reasoned
    rationale; included
    key information on
    strategic choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan is
    justified by keen
    insight into market
    dynamics and
    competitors’
    strengths, and
    provided a viable
    solution for both
    near-term and long-
    term growth

    3. Financials

    Weight: 20%

    Performed no
    financial calculations
    or made substantive
    errors

    Financial models
    and calculations
    included minor errors
    or assumptions
    which did not
    materially impact the
    strategic plan

    Correctly performed
    all basic financial
    calculation and
    modeling

    Met Pass criteria plus
    included detailed
    calculations that
    correctly and
    accurately
    summarized the
    financial health of the
    organization

    Met HP criteria plus
    included
    comprehensive
    forward-looking
    calculations of
    payback relative to
    IRR and other key
    performance metrics

    4. Competitive
    Advantage

    Weight: 15%

    Did not identify
    impact on
    competitive strength
    or presented
    assertions not
    supported by data

    Identified potential
    impact of the
    strategic plan move
    on competitive
    advantage, but did
    not address
    sustainability of
    advantage

    Identified potential
    impact on
    competitive
    advantage and
    provided basic
    insights into the
    ability of competitors
    to match move(s)

    Clearly explained the
    sustainability of the
    move(s) and why
    competitors will not
    easily be able to
    match

    Met HP criteria plus
    offered additional
    valuable insights into
    evidence supporting
    the sustainability and
    superiority of the
    strategic plan

    5. Risk

    Weight: 15%

    Incomplete or
    unclear synopsis of
    any of the most
    important strategic
    risks

    Risk analysis was
    superficial,
    demonstrating only a
    basic understanding
    of the threats to the
    proposed strategic
    plan

    Risk analysis
    demonstrated basic
    understanding of
    risks and the upside
    opportunity relative to
    that risk

    Clearly explained
    potential for risk, risk
    impact on the
    organization, and
    plan for risk
    mitigation

    Met HP criteria plus
    explained why
    proposed plan is
    superior to other risk-
    reward options

    6. Summary

    Weight: 10%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unclear summary

    Summary was vague
    and/or failed to
    connect key
    elements of the plan

    Summary provided a
    basic recap of
    connection of key
    elements of the plan

    Summary recapped
    key elements and
    drew the Board Brief
    to a clear and
    concise close

    Met HP criteria plus
    presented an
    inspiring and
    compelling call to
    action that this is the
    plan that will take the
    organization forward

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf**

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 1 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Use this checklist as a guide when you are working on each of the first three assignments for your
    Capstone Project. It will serve as a reminder of the key content areas and the qualities of a well-written
    Board Brief. Note that the components listed below are not a direct match for each topic in your
    assignments. That is not its purpose. While the elements of an effective Board Brief are fairly consistent,
    the sequence and specific content will vary somewhat depending on circumstances.

    Board Brief Component Key Features

    Executive Summary

    Include a clear executive summary (AKA
    “elevator pitch”) for your brief. A good summary
    will help focus your audience’s attention.

    Remember, you are telling a business story not
    crafting a piece of literature. Your goal is not to
    let the story just unfold as it goes. Tell your
    audience right from the beginning where the brief
    is going and what actions you are proposing.

    Note: An Executive Summary is best written after
    the brief is fully developed in order to capture the
    most significant findings, recommendations and
    conclusions.

     Capture the big idea of what you want to say

     Frame the problem/opportunity

     State your vision for the organization and the

    context for your plan

     Outline a high-level snapshot of how your
    proposed changes will increase the
    organization’s competitive strength

     If there is an “ask” (such as a vote at the next
    meeting), make note of that in the executive
    summary so that Board members know why
    they are reading the brief

    Data

    When presenting complex information to a non-
    technical audience, you must Identify key data
    relative to the problem or opportunity. Don’t
    overwhelm your readers by providing page after
    page of numbers. This may be needed for other
    types of reports, but not for a Board Brief.

    Use good judgment in highlighting the most
    critical data in the main body of the brief. If there
    are additional data sets that include important
    information, but are likely to only be reviewed by
    a few people with specialized knowledge, include
    these in an appendix (or even in a separate
    document).

     Recap of the data you have gathered and
    analyzed

     Document the sources of the data

     Summarize and communicate the data in a
    clear and meaningful way; show how the
    data support your position

     Make good use of visuals to illustrate your
    findings

     Identify areas where data may be missing or
    incomplete; explain the impact of missing
    data on your analysis – remember, you will
    never have complete data and that’s okay,

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 2 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    The data that are most important will, of course,
    vary depending on the specific focus of the brief,
    but should include qualitative and quantitative
    data on your organization, competitors and the
    marketplace to support the strategy you are
    proposing.

    It is critical that you make good use of charts,
    tables and other visual supports to display your
    data. This will help your audience to more easily
    understand the patterns, trends and anomalies in
    the data.

    but you need to convince the Board that the
    data you do have are sufficient to make an
    informed decision

    Implementation Plan

    Craft a clear map of what will happen and when.
    This should include actionable steps that identify
    and align objectives, actions and milestones.

    Use good judgement in determining the level of
    detail to provide. Your Board will not need to
    know specific personnel decisions in every
    department or the exact specifications of a new
    piece of equipment you will be purchasing. They
    need to see a “big picture” overview of how you
    will turn your plan into a reality.

    Note: It is likely that Board members will come
    back to you with additional questions on certain
    areas of the plan. That’s okay. As you continue
    to work with your Board, you will learn where
    different members want to dig deeper, and your
    board briefs will evolve to address those needs.

     Identify key goals and the actionable steps to
    achieve your desired outcomes

     Include key milestones

     Include a (proposed) timeline for each
    milestone

     Identify personnel or organizational changes
    necessary to accomplish the plan

     If additional training will be required, include
    a high-level overview of how the training will
    be delivered

     Identify changes in infrastructure, facilities
    and major equipment purchases – Note: do
    not include the financials for these in your
    implementation overview; address these in
    your financials section

    Financials

    Your initiative is not going to get approved unless
    you can demonstrate a positive return on
    investment. In preparing for your Board
    Presentation, you must address key financial
    questions for Board such as projected revenue,
    fixed and variable costs and ROI.

     How much will it cost to implement your
    plan?

     How will you secure the necessary funds?

     When will this initiative pay for itself and start
    making money?

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 3 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Additionally, you should share data related to
    why your plan is the best use of the financial
    resources of your organization.

    Use the budgeting tools you have learned about
    including NPV, IRR, Break-Even and Payback to
    help you communicate a clear financial picture to
    your Board.

     How much profit will the company earn when
    you successfully execute the plan?

    Competitive Advantage

    Your Board will expect a clear explanation of
    what your plan will accomplish to strengthen the
    “economic moat” surrounding your business.

    Keep your synopsis at a high level and make
    sure you demonstrate how your strategy clearly
    aligns with the mission of the organization.

     How will this initiative put your company
    ahead of the competition?

     How will it create a long-term sustainable
    competitive advantage?

     What will keep your competitors from just
    copying your moves?

    Risk Mitigation

    A Board presentation from the CEO can’t be all
    about the good with none of the bad. Yes, you
    want to convince the Board that your idea is the
    right one and you are the one who can make it
    happen, but you also have a responsibility to
    educate the Board about the risks relative to the
    rewards and the steps you will take to manage
    those risks. This includes threats from outside
    the organization such as what competitors can
    do to keep you from achieving market leadership
    or forces that are impacting the larger economy.

     Summarize the risks (from inside and outside

    forces) that could undermine the success of
    you plan

     Explain to the Board how these risks have
    been assessed and how your plan offers the
    right balance of risk and reward

    Summary or Wrap-Up

    Keep it short and sweet, but pull the pieces
    together. Bringing everything back to the
    Mission is a good way to end a Board Brief.

     Include a “call to action” – this is usually a
    reminder of the request for approval being
    sought at the upcoming meeting

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneAssignment3.pdf**

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 1 of 3

    Assignment 3: Overview of the Strategic Plan
    Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 9 (20% of Course Grade)

    Overview

    In this assignment, you create the third component of your Board Brief, an overview of your strategic plan.
    The purpose of the overview is to give Board members a preview of the key changes you will make in order
    to implement your plan, and to explain how these changes will impact the organization. This information
    enables your Board to come to the meeting better prepared and to ask more informed questions. Your
    overview must be clear and complete enough that it makes sense, but it should not be overly wordy.

    Your instructor will review your strategic plan and will provide comments and questions where needed to
    help you strengthen your presentation. You will be given these questions in advance of your presentation
    and will be expected to address them in your delivery.

    Instructions

    1. Building on your previous submissions, include an additional 3 to 4 pages to take the analysis work
    you have done in the first two assignments and turn it into an actionable plan.

    2. An effective plan overview will include:

    a. A clear and compelling opening statement (executive summary) that explains the strategic
    initiative

    b. A high-level outline of your implementation plan, including costs, impact on operations, ROI
    projections, competitive advantage, and risks associated with the plan, along with your
    mitigation plans

    c. A reminder of the challenges and opportunities facing the organization and how your
    proposed plan will address these

    d. Enough information to allow Board members to prepare for the upcoming meeting and to
    formulate additional questions

    e. A summary statement recapping why the proposed strategic initiative is necessary and
    specifying the approvals being sought at the upcoming Board meeting

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 2 of 3

    Formatting and Submission Requirements

    NOTE: Use the Board Brief Checklist in the course shell to ensure that you have included the required
    content, from each of the three assignments in this course, in your final Board Brief.

    • Submit your work in Word

    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, and
    the course title and date

    • Include a references page with your sources

    • The cover page and the references page are not included in the required page length

    • Use professional font (Times New Roman or Arial), 10-12 font size, and double-space

    • Headings are used to identify main topics and subtopics

    • Paragraphs are separated by a single space

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Assignment 3

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 599 – Assignment 3 (1244) Page 3 of 3

    RUBRIC: Assignment 3

    CRITERIA

    Unsatisfactory

    Low Pass

    Pass

    High Pass

    Honors

    1. Executive
    Summary/
    Opening
    Statement

    Weight: 10%

    Executive summary
    was missing or off-
    topic

    Executive summary
    covered main points,
    but was disorganized
    or overly detailed

    Executive summary
    provided a basic
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Executive summary
    provided an excellent
    synopsis of the
    strategic plan

    Met HP criteria plus
    displayed an
    engaging style that
    indicates a powerful
    opening that will grab
    the audience

    2. Plan Outline

    Weight: 30%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unrealistic
    explanation of the
    strategic plan

    Strategic plan was
    outlined, but lacked
    substantive rationale
    for key choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan was
    outlined; included
    basic rationale and
    information on key
    choices and actions

    Strategic plan
    included a clear and
    well-reasoned
    rationale; included
    key information on
    strategic choices and
    actions

    Strategic plan is
    justified by keen
    insight into market
    dynamics and
    competitors’
    strengths, and
    provided a viable
    solution for both
    near-term and long-
    term growth

    3. Financials

    Weight: 20%

    Performed no
    financial calculations
    or made substantive
    errors

    Financial models
    and calculations
    included minor errors
    or assumptions
    which did not
    materially impact the
    strategic plan

    Correctly performed
    all basic financial
    calculation and
    modeling

    Met Pass criteria plus
    included detailed
    calculations that
    correctly and
    accurately
    summarized the
    financial health of the
    organization

    Met HP criteria plus
    included
    comprehensive
    forward-looking
    calculations of
    payback relative to
    IRR and other key
    performance metrics

    4. Competitive
    Advantage

    Weight: 15%

    Did not identify
    impact on
    competitive strength
    or presented
    assertions not
    supported by data

    Identified potential
    impact of the
    strategic plan move
    on competitive
    advantage, but did
    not address
    sustainability of
    advantage

    Identified potential
    impact on
    competitive
    advantage and
    provided basic
    insights into the
    ability of competitors
    to match move(s)

    Clearly explained the
    sustainability of the
    move(s) and why
    competitors will not
    easily be able to
    match

    Met HP criteria plus
    offered additional
    valuable insights into
    evidence supporting
    the sustainability and
    superiority of the
    strategic plan

    5. Risk

    Weight: 15%

    Incomplete or
    unclear synopsis of
    any of the most
    important strategic
    risks

    Risk analysis was
    superficial,
    demonstrating only a
    basic understanding
    of the threats to the
    proposed strategic
    plan

    Risk analysis
    demonstrated basic
    understanding of
    risks and the upside
    opportunity relative to
    that risk

    Clearly explained
    potential for risk, risk
    impact on the
    organization, and
    plan for risk
    mitigation

    Met HP criteria plus
    explained why
    proposed plan is
    superior to other risk-
    reward options

    6. Summary

    Weight: 10%

    Missing, incomplete,
    or unclear summary

    Summary was vague
    and/or failed to
    connect key
    elements of the plan

    Summary provided a
    basic recap of
    connection of key
    elements of the plan

    Summary recapped
    key elements and
    drew the Board Brief
    to a clear and
    concise close

    Met HP criteria plus
    presented an
    inspiring and
    compelling call to
    action that this is the
    plan that will take the
    organization forward

    **## JWI599BusinessAnalyticsandCapstoneBoardBriefChecklist.pdf**

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 1 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Use this checklist as a guide when you are working on each of the first three assignments for your
    Capstone Project. It will serve as a reminder of the key content areas and the qualities of a well-written
    Board Brief. Note that the components listed below are not a direct match for each topic in your
    assignments. That is not its purpose. While the elements of an effective Board Brief are fairly consistent,
    the sequence and specific content will vary somewhat depending on circumstances.

    Board Brief Component Key Features

    Executive Summary

    Include a clear executive summary (AKA
    “elevator pitch”) for your brief. A good summary
    will help focus your audience’s attention.

    Remember, you are telling a business story not
    crafting a piece of literature. Your goal is not to
    let the story just unfold as it goes. Tell your
    audience right from the beginning where the brief
    is going and what actions you are proposing.

    Note: An Executive Summary is best written after
    the brief is fully developed in order to capture the
    most significant findings, recommendations and
    conclusions.

     Capture the big idea of what you want to say

     Frame the problem/opportunity

     State your vision for the organization and the

    context for your plan

     Outline a high-level snapshot of how your
    proposed changes will increase the
    organization’s competitive strength

     If there is an “ask” (such as a vote at the next
    meeting), make note of that in the executive
    summary so that Board members know why
    they are reading the brief

    Data

    When presenting complex information to a non-
    technical audience, you must Identify key data
    relative to the problem or opportunity. Don’t
    overwhelm your readers by providing page after
    page of numbers. This may be needed for other
    types of reports, but not for a Board Brief.

    Use good judgment in highlighting the most
    critical data in the main body of the brief. If there
    are additional data sets that include important
    information, but are likely to only be reviewed by
    a few people with specialized knowledge, include
    these in an appendix (or even in a separate
    document).

     Recap of the data you have gathered and
    analyzed

     Document the sources of the data

     Summarize and communicate the data in a
    clear and meaningful way; show how the
    data support your position

     Make good use of visuals to illustrate your
    findings

     Identify areas where data may be missing or
    incomplete; explain the impact of missing
    data on your analysis – remember, you will
    never have complete data and that’s okay,

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 2 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    The data that are most important will, of course,
    vary depending on the specific focus of the brief,
    but should include qualitative and quantitative
    data on your organization, competitors and the
    marketplace to support the strategy you are
    proposing.

    It is critical that you make good use of charts,
    tables and other visual supports to display your
    data. This will help your audience to more easily
    understand the patterns, trends and anomalies in
    the data.

    but you need to convince the Board that the
    data you do have are sufficient to make an
    informed decision

    Implementation Plan

    Craft a clear map of what will happen and when.
    This should include actionable steps that identify
    and align objectives, actions and milestones.

    Use good judgement in determining the level of
    detail to provide. Your Board will not need to
    know specific personnel decisions in every
    department or the exact specifications of a new
    piece of equipment you will be purchasing. They
    need to see a “big picture” overview of how you
    will turn your plan into a reality.

    Note: It is likely that Board members will come
    back to you with additional questions on certain
    areas of the plan. That’s okay. As you continue
    to work with your Board, you will learn where
    different members want to dig deeper, and your
    board briefs will evolve to address those needs.

     Identify key goals and the actionable steps to
    achieve your desired outcomes

     Include key milestones

     Include a (proposed) timeline for each
    milestone

     Identify personnel or organizational changes
    necessary to accomplish the plan

     If additional training will be required, include
    a high-level overview of how the training will
    be delivered

     Identify changes in infrastructure, facilities
    and major equipment purchases – Note: do
    not include the financials for these in your
    implementation overview; address these in
    your financials section

    Financials

    Your initiative is not going to get approved unless
    you can demonstrate a positive return on
    investment. In preparing for your Board
    Presentation, you must address key financial
    questions for Board such as projected revenue,
    fixed and variable costs and ROI.

     How much will it cost to implement your
    plan?

     How will you secure the necessary funds?

     When will this initiative pay for itself and start
    making money?

    599 – Board Brief Checklist Page 3 of 3

    JWI 599: Business Analytics and Capstone

    Board Brief Checklist

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and
    may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
    Strayer University.

    Additionally, you should share data related to
    why your plan is the best use of the financial
    resources of your organization.

    Use the budgeting tools you have learned about
    including NPV, IRR, Break-Even and Payback to
    help you communicate a clear financial picture to
    your Board.

     How much profit will the company earn when
    you successfully execute the plan?

    Competitive Advantage

    Your Board will expect a clear explanation of
    what your plan will accomplish to strengthen the
    “economic moat” surrounding your business.

    Keep your synopsis at a high level and make
    sure you demonstrate how your strategy clearly
    aligns with the mission of the organization.

     How will this initiative put your company
    ahead of the competition?

     How will it create a long-term sustainable
    competitive advantage?

     What will keep your competitors from just
    copying your moves?

    Risk Mitigation

    A Board presentation from the CEO can’t be all
    about the good with none of the bad. Yes, you
    want to convince the Board that your idea is the
    right one and you are the one who can make it
    happen, but you also have a responsibility to
    educate the Board about the risks relative to the
    rewards and the steps you will take to manage
    those risks. This includes threats from outside
    the organization such as what competitors can
    do to keep you from achieving market leadership
    or forces that are impacting the larger economy.

     Summarize the risks (from inside and outside

    forces) that could undermine the success of
    you plan

     Explain to the Board how these risks have
    been assessed and how your plan offers the
    right balance of risk and reward

    Summary or Wrap-Up

    Keep it short and sweet, but pull the pieces
    together. Bringing everything back to the
    Mission is a good way to end a Board Brief.

     Include a “call to action” – this is usually a
    reminder of the request for approval being
    sought at the upcoming meeting

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Expanding Your Literature Search

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please answer all 11 questions ‘DUE Tomorrow Sunday by 6p EST – ## ExpandingYourLiteratureSearch.txt **## ExpandingYourLiteratureSearch.txt** Expanding Your Literature Search At this point, you have five articles. Now you need to double that number to have at least 10 articles for your literature re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please answer all 11 questions
    ‘DUE Tomorrow Sunday by 6p EST

    – ## ExpandingYourLiteratureSearch.txt

    **## ExpandingYourLiteratureSearch.txt**

    Expanding Your Literature Search

    At this point, you have five articles. Now you need to double that number to have at least 10 articles for your literature review. What are some strategies to expand your literature search?
    1. Reference list
    a. Relevant articles will cite other articles that you should also read, so review it for articles that interest you.
    2. Keywords identified in article
    a. Some journals include relevant keywords for that article. If the journal does this, they are often found right under the abstract. Try those terms if you want to read more articles like that one.
    3. Authors
    a. If you find an especially interesting article, look up the author to see what else they have published. Check to see if they have a website: they often list their publications there.

    • QUESTION 1
    Look at the articles you already have and consider the ones that you found especially relevant. Review the reference list. Identify two articles in the reference list that you could locate:
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 2
    Look to see if any of the current articles you have list keywords. What are two new keywords, or keyword combinations, that you could use to search for more articles?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 3
    Identify the author(s) of one of your articles and look them up. You can use Google to see if they have a website as well as search for their work in the literature databases. Who are you going to read up on?
    Enter your response

    Databases Part 1

    Another thing to consider is the database you’re searching. Summon is the general database that pulls from all of Capella’s online databases. If you find more specific databases, that can increase the likelihood that you’ll find relevant articles.
    Some useful databases for human services include:
    – PsycArticles
    – Psychology Database
    – PsycINFO
    – Sage Journals Online
    – SocIndex with Full Text
    – Sociology Database
    The advantage of searching in certain databases is that the results are more likely to be relevant to your topic compared to what you may find in, say, the Education database. Using the general Summon databases will yield results from a variety of disciplines besides your own.
    • QUESTION 4
    Which databases will you use to search for articles? Try a new one if you haven’t searched it yet!
    Enter your response

    Databases Part 2

    After you locate your additional articles, analyze them just like you did for assessment 3: first, individually, and then comparing/contrasting the findings for similarities and differences.
    Hopefully, you feel like you have a deeper understanding of your topic with the new information. If not, consider: were these new articles relevant?
    A couple of other things to remember about the literature searches:
    • Limit your lit search to the last five years
    • Make sure you select a research article, not something like a literature review, dissertation, or another document (Capella library guide: https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/c.php?g=197572&p=1302271)
    • You can search multiple databases at once.
    Resources:
    • Human Services Doctoral (DHS) Program Library Guide (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/hsdoc)
    • Searching the Library for Articles (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/hsdoc/basicsearch)
    • How do I Know I’m Looking at It (research article)? (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/c.php?g=197572&p=1302271)
    • Searching Multiple Databases (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MultipleDatabases)

    Incorporating Theory

    Research refers to the systematic collection and analysis of data to answer a research question, such as testing a hypothesis. Theory refers to how things are: they are questions that have been tested repeatedly and have not been disproven. Both research studies and theories are written in scholarly articles, but theory tends to focus on the ideas, supported with previous research findings.
    Theory is as crucial to doctoral-level professionals as research; it helps them make sense of all the findings. For example, let’s say you find multiple articles that indicate employees tend to think more highly of leaders who share their religious beliefs:
    • Protestant Christian employees tend to view Protestant Christian leaders most favorably
    • Roman Catholic employees tend to view Roman Catholic leaders most favorably
    • Jewish American employees tend to view Jewish American leaders most favorably
    • Muslim employees tend to view Muslim leaders most favorably
    What theory could help us make sense of this? Tajfel (1974) theorized that people sometimes prefer others who are like them (in-group) over others who are different (out-group) as part of his theory on social identity. Social identity theory (Tajfel, 1974) helps make sense of the findings listed above.
    When searching for scholarly theories, remember these things:
    1. Scholarly theories are published in peer-reviewed journals and by academic publications. Self-help books are not appropriate sources for scholarly theories.
    2. Theories have been tested repeatedly and not disproven. If you cannot find research on a theory, it is not a scholarly theory.
    3. You should always read the primary sources for theories rather than rely on summaries from textbooks or other articles. It is appropriate to have older citations for theories.
    The research findings and scholarly theories are the specialized knowledge that doctoral professionals use to inform their thinking. Some common theories used in social science include:
    – Urie Bronfenbrenner’s (1992) ecological systems theory focuses on how the environment beyond the family can influence child development.
    – Albert Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory posits that, not only do people learn from their environment, but they also influence their environment, hence influencing their own learning.
    – Albert Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory focuses on how our thoughts and beliefs (cognitions) influence people.
    – Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) cognitive bias theory is about how people can systematically rely on flawed ideas/thinking patterns to solve problems.
    – Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) stress and coping theory defines stress as an imbalance between an internal or external stressor and perceived resources to manage the stressor.
    • QUESTION 5
    There are many theories out there to help make sense of research findings: just make sure it is a scholarly one! A relevant theory may be discussed in the introduction or discussion section of an article. You can also find them discussed in textbooks (especially for introductory-level courses) but do make sure to look up the primary source. Textbooks can be located in Capella’s ebook database in the library.
    What is a theory that helps you make sense of the research findings for your paper?
    Enter your response

    APA Format

    We’ve reviewed APA format for headings, but you want to make sure you are adhering to APA format for all your writing. We’ll review:
    – In-text citation format
    – Reference list format
    -In-Text Citation Format
    Single author
    Only the last name of the author is included in an in-text citation: first and middle initials should only go in the reference list. The appropriate format for an in-text citation where the author is not referred to explicitly in the sentence is:
    – Burnout is a significant predictor of attrition rates (Clarkson, 2021).
    Both the author’s name and publication year are in parentheses, separated by a comma.
    The appropriate format for an in-text citation where the author is referred to explicitly in the sentence is:
    – Clarkson (2021) identified burnout as a significant predictor of attrition rates.
    Since the author is referred to explicitly, the name is outside of parentheses and no comma is needed. A comma is only required if the author name is in the parentheses.
    Multiple Authors for One Article
    If there are more than two authors, you must refer to all of the authors the first time in the paper, and you can then switch to “et al.”
    – Windmere, Louis, and Fletcher (2022) examined the relationship between leadership style and employee satisfaction. Employee satisfaction rates were highest for transformational leaders and lowest for authoritarian leaders (Windmere et al., 2022).
    Note that there is no comma after Windmere in the parentheses: a comma is not needed to separate the first author from “et al.”

    Multiple Articles in one set of parentheses

    If one sentence is supported by multiple articles, you may choose to put all of the citations in one set of parentheses. The author and publication year are still separated by commas; the articles are separated by semicolons. The articles should be alphabetized based on the last name of the first author.
    – The demographic characteristics of leaders influences how employees view them (Giles and Anderson, 2020; Jackson, 2022).
    Question: Identify the correct in-text citation format:
    Option A: Holly (2020), found that case managers with high caseloads were more likely to report feeling overwhelmed.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect: no comma is needed after (2020). A comma is only needed if the author name and publication year are both in parentheses.
    Option B: Jones, et al (2019) demonstrated the relationship between repetition and skill acquisition.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect for two reasons: (1) no comma is needed after Jones to separate it from et al. and (2) “et al.” must always be followed by a period.
    Option C: (Becker, 2021) asked leaders about their experiences starting their non-profit organizations.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect since the author, Becker, is referred to explicitly: Becker is the subject of the sentence. Therefore, the name should not be in parentheses.
    Option D: Non-profit leaders struggled the most with financial management of their organizations (Smith, 2020).
    Formative Answer: This is the correct answer: since the author is not referred to explicitly in the sentence, both the name and publication year are in parentheses and are separated by a comma.
    Option E: Protecting tax-exempt status was a significant challenge for leaders whose organizations generated significant revenue (Thompson, 2020, Deane and Watson, 2022).
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect for two reasons: (1) the two articles are not separated by a semicolon, and (2) they are not in alphabetical order (Deane and Watson should precede Thompson).
    Reference: APA Format for in-text citation: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_author_authors.html
    Reference List Format
    To see the correct format for a reference list, review APA Academic Writer and copy that format exactly. It matters where you put periods, commas, and how you capitalize article titles vs journal names, so pay attention to the details!
    • QUESTION 6
    Correct the mistakes in the reference below:
    Jackson, Amber T., Ricki, Gillian M., & Thompson, Jesse L. (2022) Leadership Style and Organizational Success, Human Services Organizational Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, pp. 482 – 491.
    Enter your response

    Literature Review Organization

    Once you have a list/table of your findings, it’s time to start thinking about writing the literature review. The stages of writing a literature review are:
    1. Prewriting
    2. Drafting
    3. Peer Review (if possible)
    4. Revising
    5. Proofreading
    Prewriting
    Prewriting is when you think through the ideas that you want to write about. At this point, you’ve read the articles, analyzed them (individually), and synthesized them (thought about the articles as a group) to identify key points.
    How are you going to organize those points? What is the overall point of your paper? This is what you determine in the prewriting stage. It is tempting to skip this step. DON’T DO IT.
    Most writing problems are thinking problems, and this is the thinking part. If you start trying to write without a clear sense of the point of your paper and the supporting points, you will have a jumbled mess to revise.
    Some things to consider in the prewriting stage are:
    1. What is the main point of this paper?
    2. What are the key points to elaborate on the main point?
    3. What is a logical order for these points?
    Identifying the Main Point
    The main point of your paper (what can also be referred to as the “thesis” or “main argument”) is a combination of:
    – Your topic
    – Research findings
    Let’s say you started out wanting to understand how cis female and transgender female leaders maintain their authority in work environments where the staff is predominantly cis male. That’s your topic.
    The research might indicate:
    – The experience is different for cis female and transgender females due to gender socialization differences and different reactions to their gender identities
    1. Cis gender leaders deal with gender socialization that encourages maintaining relationships over establishing dominance
    2. Transgender females are not accustomed to the sexism that cis females grow up experiencing
    – Both groups experience frequent challenges to their authority
    – Both groups develop strategies to establish authority while maintaining productive working relationships, but those strategies differ
    So while you started out wanting to know how female leaders (whether cis female or transgender female) maintain authority among predominately male subordinates, you discovered that the experiences are unique based on whether they are cis female or transgender.
    The main point or thesis now is: Female leaders, whether cis female or transgender female, face challenges to their authority from male subordinates, but the experiences are different for cis female leaders compared to transgender female leaders.
    • QUESTION 7
    Look at your notes from your articles. What is the main point?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 8
    What are the key ideas in the story (add more if you need them)?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 9
    Are any of the ideas not directly relevant to your topic (although they may be interesting)? Note them here. They could be useful things to read about another time!
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 10
    What is a logical order? Order the ideas in two different ways.
    Enter your response

    Formal Outline

    Now that you have your ideas, put them into a formal outline with headings that you will use in the paper. Here’s the outline you need to use for this assessment:
    I. Introduction
    II. Literature Review
    III. Theory
    IV. Project Proposal
    The literature review is the section that will need the most thought, since the headings/subheadings will vary for each of you, based on what you’re reading. For example, continuing with the above example, the lit review outline could be:
    I. Introduction
    II. Literature Review
    a. Cis female and transgender female leaders experience challenges to authority
    i. Gender socialization
    ii. Reaction to sexism
    b. Strategies to Establish Authority
    i. Cis female gender strategies
    ii. Transgender female strategies
    c. Responses to Challenges of Authority
    i. Cis female responses
    ii. Transgender female responses
    III. Theory
    IV. Project Proposal
    • QUESTION 11
    Write an outline for your paper:
    Enter your response

    **## ExpandingYourLiteratureSearch.txt**

    Expanding Your Literature Search

    At this point, you have five articles. Now you need to double that number to have at least 10 articles for your literature review. What are some strategies to expand your literature search?
    1. Reference list
    a. Relevant articles will cite other articles that you should also read, so review it for articles that interest you.
    2. Keywords identified in article
    a. Some journals include relevant keywords for that article. If the journal does this, they are often found right under the abstract. Try those terms if you want to read more articles like that one.
    3. Authors
    a. If you find an especially interesting article, look up the author to see what else they have published. Check to see if they have a website: they often list their publications there.

    • QUESTION 1
    Look at the articles you already have and consider the ones that you found especially relevant. Review the reference list. Identify two articles in the reference list that you could locate:
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 2
    Look to see if any of the current articles you have list keywords. What are two new keywords, or keyword combinations, that you could use to search for more articles?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 3
    Identify the author(s) of one of your articles and look them up. You can use Google to see if they have a website as well as search for their work in the literature databases. Who are you going to read up on?
    Enter your response

    Databases Part 1

    Another thing to consider is the database you’re searching. Summon is the general database that pulls from all of Capella’s online databases. If you find more specific databases, that can increase the likelihood that you’ll find relevant articles.
    Some useful databases for human services include:
    – PsycArticles
    – Psychology Database
    – PsycINFO
    – Sage Journals Online
    – SocIndex with Full Text
    – Sociology Database
    The advantage of searching in certain databases is that the results are more likely to be relevant to your topic compared to what you may find in, say, the Education database. Using the general Summon databases will yield results from a variety of disciplines besides your own.
    • QUESTION 4
    Which databases will you use to search for articles? Try a new one if you haven’t searched it yet!
    Enter your response

    Databases Part 2

    After you locate your additional articles, analyze them just like you did for assessment 3: first, individually, and then comparing/contrasting the findings for similarities and differences.
    Hopefully, you feel like you have a deeper understanding of your topic with the new information. If not, consider: were these new articles relevant?
    A couple of other things to remember about the literature searches:
    • Limit your lit search to the last five years
    • Make sure you select a research article, not something like a literature review, dissertation, or another document (Capella library guide: https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/c.php?g=197572&p=1302271)
    • You can search multiple databases at once.
    Resources:
    • Human Services Doctoral (DHS) Program Library Guide (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/hsdoc)
    • Searching the Library for Articles (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/hsdoc/basicsearch)
    • How do I Know I’m Looking at It (research article)? (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/c.php?g=197572&p=1302271)
    • Searching Multiple Databases (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MultipleDatabases)

    Incorporating Theory

    Research refers to the systematic collection and analysis of data to answer a research question, such as testing a hypothesis. Theory refers to how things are: they are questions that have been tested repeatedly and have not been disproven. Both research studies and theories are written in scholarly articles, but theory tends to focus on the ideas, supported with previous research findings.
    Theory is as crucial to doctoral-level professionals as research; it helps them make sense of all the findings. For example, let’s say you find multiple articles that indicate employees tend to think more highly of leaders who share their religious beliefs:
    • Protestant Christian employees tend to view Protestant Christian leaders most favorably
    • Roman Catholic employees tend to view Roman Catholic leaders most favorably
    • Jewish American employees tend to view Jewish American leaders most favorably
    • Muslim employees tend to view Muslim leaders most favorably
    What theory could help us make sense of this? Tajfel (1974) theorized that people sometimes prefer others who are like them (in-group) over others who are different (out-group) as part of his theory on social identity. Social identity theory (Tajfel, 1974) helps make sense of the findings listed above.
    When searching for scholarly theories, remember these things:
    1. Scholarly theories are published in peer-reviewed journals and by academic publications. Self-help books are not appropriate sources for scholarly theories.
    2. Theories have been tested repeatedly and not disproven. If you cannot find research on a theory, it is not a scholarly theory.
    3. You should always read the primary sources for theories rather than rely on summaries from textbooks or other articles. It is appropriate to have older citations for theories.
    The research findings and scholarly theories are the specialized knowledge that doctoral professionals use to inform their thinking. Some common theories used in social science include:
    – Urie Bronfenbrenner’s (1992) ecological systems theory focuses on how the environment beyond the family can influence child development.
    – Albert Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory posits that, not only do people learn from their environment, but they also influence their environment, hence influencing their own learning.
    – Albert Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory focuses on how our thoughts and beliefs (cognitions) influence people.
    – Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) cognitive bias theory is about how people can systematically rely on flawed ideas/thinking patterns to solve problems.
    – Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) stress and coping theory defines stress as an imbalance between an internal or external stressor and perceived resources to manage the stressor.
    • QUESTION 5
    There are many theories out there to help make sense of research findings: just make sure it is a scholarly one! A relevant theory may be discussed in the introduction or discussion section of an article. You can also find them discussed in textbooks (especially for introductory-level courses) but do make sure to look up the primary source. Textbooks can be located in Capella’s ebook database in the library.
    What is a theory that helps you make sense of the research findings for your paper?
    Enter your response

    APA Format

    We’ve reviewed APA format for headings, but you want to make sure you are adhering to APA format for all your writing. We’ll review:
    – In-text citation format
    – Reference list format
    -In-Text Citation Format
    Single author
    Only the last name of the author is included in an in-text citation: first and middle initials should only go in the reference list. The appropriate format for an in-text citation where the author is not referred to explicitly in the sentence is:
    – Burnout is a significant predictor of attrition rates (Clarkson, 2021).
    Both the author’s name and publication year are in parentheses, separated by a comma.
    The appropriate format for an in-text citation where the author is referred to explicitly in the sentence is:
    – Clarkson (2021) identified burnout as a significant predictor of attrition rates.
    Since the author is referred to explicitly, the name is outside of parentheses and no comma is needed. A comma is only required if the author name is in the parentheses.
    Multiple Authors for One Article
    If there are more than two authors, you must refer to all of the authors the first time in the paper, and you can then switch to “et al.”
    – Windmere, Louis, and Fletcher (2022) examined the relationship between leadership style and employee satisfaction. Employee satisfaction rates were highest for transformational leaders and lowest for authoritarian leaders (Windmere et al., 2022).
    Note that there is no comma after Windmere in the parentheses: a comma is not needed to separate the first author from “et al.”

    Multiple Articles in one set of parentheses

    If one sentence is supported by multiple articles, you may choose to put all of the citations in one set of parentheses. The author and publication year are still separated by commas; the articles are separated by semicolons. The articles should be alphabetized based on the last name of the first author.
    – The demographic characteristics of leaders influences how employees view them (Giles and Anderson, 2020; Jackson, 2022).
    Question: Identify the correct in-text citation format:
    Option A: Holly (2020), found that case managers with high caseloads were more likely to report feeling overwhelmed.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect: no comma is needed after (2020). A comma is only needed if the author name and publication year are both in parentheses.
    Option B: Jones, et al (2019) demonstrated the relationship between repetition and skill acquisition.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect for two reasons: (1) no comma is needed after Jones to separate it from et al. and (2) “et al.” must always be followed by a period.
    Option C: (Becker, 2021) asked leaders about their experiences starting their non-profit organizations.
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect since the author, Becker, is referred to explicitly: Becker is the subject of the sentence. Therefore, the name should not be in parentheses.
    Option D: Non-profit leaders struggled the most with financial management of their organizations (Smith, 2020).
    Formative Answer: This is the correct answer: since the author is not referred to explicitly in the sentence, both the name and publication year are in parentheses and are separated by a comma.
    Option E: Protecting tax-exempt status was a significant challenge for leaders whose organizations generated significant revenue (Thompson, 2020, Deane and Watson, 2022).
    Formative Answer: This is incorrect for two reasons: (1) the two articles are not separated by a semicolon, and (2) they are not in alphabetical order (Deane and Watson should precede Thompson).
    Reference: APA Format for in-text citation: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_author_authors.html
    Reference List Format
    To see the correct format for a reference list, review APA Academic Writer and copy that format exactly. It matters where you put periods, commas, and how you capitalize article titles vs journal names, so pay attention to the details!
    • QUESTION 6
    Correct the mistakes in the reference below:
    Jackson, Amber T., Ricki, Gillian M., & Thompson, Jesse L. (2022) Leadership Style and Organizational Success, Human Services Organizational Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, pp. 482 – 491.
    Enter your response

    Literature Review Organization

    Once you have a list/table of your findings, it’s time to start thinking about writing the literature review. The stages of writing a literature review are:
    1. Prewriting
    2. Drafting
    3. Peer Review (if possible)
    4. Revising
    5. Proofreading
    Prewriting
    Prewriting is when you think through the ideas that you want to write about. At this point, you’ve read the articles, analyzed them (individually), and synthesized them (thought about the articles as a group) to identify key points.
    How are you going to organize those points? What is the overall point of your paper? This is what you determine in the prewriting stage. It is tempting to skip this step. DON’T DO IT.
    Most writing problems are thinking problems, and this is the thinking part. If you start trying to write without a clear sense of the point of your paper and the supporting points, you will have a jumbled mess to revise.
    Some things to consider in the prewriting stage are:
    1. What is the main point of this paper?
    2. What are the key points to elaborate on the main point?
    3. What is a logical order for these points?
    Identifying the Main Point
    The main point of your paper (what can also be referred to as the “thesis” or “main argument”) is a combination of:
    – Your topic
    – Research findings
    Let’s say you started out wanting to understand how cis female and transgender female leaders maintain their authority in work environments where the staff is predominantly cis male. That’s your topic.
    The research might indicate:
    – The experience is different for cis female and transgender females due to gender socialization differences and different reactions to their gender identities
    1. Cis gender leaders deal with gender socialization that encourages maintaining relationships over establishing dominance
    2. Transgender females are not accustomed to the sexism that cis females grow up experiencing
    – Both groups experience frequent challenges to their authority
    – Both groups develop strategies to establish authority while maintaining productive working relationships, but those strategies differ
    So while you started out wanting to know how female leaders (whether cis female or transgender female) maintain authority among predominately male subordinates, you discovered that the experiences are unique based on whether they are cis female or transgender.
    The main point or thesis now is: Female leaders, whether cis female or transgender female, face challenges to their authority from male subordinates, but the experiences are different for cis female leaders compared to transgender female leaders.
    • QUESTION 7
    Look at your notes from your articles. What is the main point?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 8
    What are the key ideas in the story (add more if you need them)?
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 9
    Are any of the ideas not directly relevant to your topic (although they may be interesting)? Note them here. They could be useful things to read about another time!
    Enter your response
    • QUESTION 10
    What is a logical order? Order the ideas in two different ways.
    Enter your response

    Formal Outline

    Now that you have your ideas, put them into a formal outline with headings that you will use in the paper. Here’s the outline you need to use for this assessment:
    I. Introduction
    II. Literature Review
    III. Theory
    IV. Project Proposal
    The literature review is the section that will need the most thought, since the headings/subheadings will vary for each of you, based on what you’re reading. For example, continuing with the above example, the lit review outline could be:
    I. Introduction
    II. Literature Review
    a. Cis female and transgender female leaders experience challenges to authority
    i. Gender socialization
    ii. Reaction to sexism
    b. Strategies to Establish Authority
    i. Cis female gender strategies
    ii. Transgender female strategies
    c. Responses to Challenges of Authority
    i. Cis female responses
    ii. Transgender female responses
    III. Theory
    IV. Project Proposal
    • QUESTION 11
    Write an outline for your paper:
    Enter your response

  • [Solved] SNHU MODULE IDS 105 Module 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please complete IDS-105 ModIke 4 assignment only. Discussion is already late and will not be accepted. Please complete assignment only. ***Best Bid Only***

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please complete IDS-105 ModIke 4 assignment only. Discussion is already late and will not be accepted. Please complete assignment only.
    ***Best Bid Only***

  • [Solved] Developing as an Academic Writer

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    If you haven't had an instructor make a comment about the expectations for "graduate level writing," you likely will. This is another way of saying "scholarly writing." What makes it challenging is that scholarly writing requires clear articulation of your thoughts and empirical support for any clai…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    If you haven't had an instructor make a comment about the expectations for "graduate level writing," you likely will. This is another way of saying "scholarly writing." What makes it challenging is that scholarly writing requires clear articulation of your thoughts and empirical support for any claims. You may have heard a TV pundit or government official make a claim like, "None of the studies indicate this." In scholarly writing, you must cite the studies you're referencing, for example, and define terms you're using. It's a challenge at first, but it becomes easier with practice!
    For this week's discussion, discuss one of the following:
    1. What is it like for you to have to clearly articulate your thoughts and support them with scholarly work?
    2. What is it like when the research findings don't support your assumptions?
    3. What tips/strategies would you share with your colleagues to strategies to make your writing more scholarly?
    ## **Response Guidelines**
    Read the posts of your peers and respond to at least one other learner. Please make sure your response is substantive.

  • [Solved] Compensations and Benefits

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Compensations and Benefits.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] MAT-274 Inferential Statistics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You suspect that among fraternal twins born across the United States, the second-born twin has a higher resting heart rate from ages 0-2 years. Your instructor will provide an Excel sheet containing resting heart rate data (in beats per minute) for 129 pairs of fraternal twins, measured at age 1 yea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You suspect that among fraternal twins born across the United States, the second-born twin has a higher resting heart rate from ages 0-2 years. Your instructor will provide an Excel sheet containing resting heart rate data (in beats per minute) for 129 pairs of fraternal twins, measured at age 1 year. You will be addressing the following areas, including relevant calculations and explanations; see the assignment style guide for details about what to consider in your responses:
    (1)Consider how your data is obtained.
    (2)Select an appropriate hypothesis test.
    (3)Describe your hypothesis in mathematical and nonmathematical terms.
    (4)Using your Excel sample data, complete the relevant hypothesis test calculations.
    (5)Make a formal decision on your null hypothesis.
    (6)Using your Excel sample data, complete the relevant confidence interval calculations.
    (7)Discuss how to interpret your confidence interval.
    (8)Consider the effects of increasing the sample size.
    (9)Consider confounding variables
    \
    MAT-274-RS-InferentialStatisticsProject-FA24.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-274-rs-inferentialstatisticsproject-fa24-docx-10308227 "MAT-274-RS-InferentialStatisticsProject-FA24.docx")
    \
    MAT-274-RS-InferentialStyleGuide-FA24.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-274-rs-inferentialstyleguide-fa24-docx-10308229 "MAT-274-RS-InferentialStyleGuide-FA24.docx")
    \
    4-14MAT274ProjectData.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/4-14mat274projectdata-xlsx-10308231 "4-14MAT274ProjectData.xlsx")