Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Literature

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Could I have help with this assignment? – ## literature.docx – ## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx **## literature.docx** With this paper, you will analyze a short story of your choice and divulge the hidden meaning(s) found in the text. You may choose any of the essays on this link (or anoth…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Could I have help with this assignment?

    – ## literature.docx

    – ## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx

    **## literature.docx**

    With this paper, you will analyze a short story of your choice and divulge the hidden meaning(s) found in the text.

    You may choose any of the essays on this link (or another scholarly work of your choosing):
    [Short Story ChoicesLinks to an external site.](https://lithub.com/43-of-the-most-iconic-short-stories-in-the-english-language/)

    Address the following prompt:

    What is the message of the story you chose? What techniques or strategies does the writer use to deliver the message? Please use the worksheet you completed in Learning Activity #1 to help you determine the techniques.

    For example, did the author use foreshadowing, figurative language, suspense, etc.  to help deliver the message? Did the author use characterization to help deliver the message? Did the author use the sequence of events to deliver the message?

    When writing this paper, you need to focus on one or two strategies. The main purpose of this paper is the determine whether you can figure out the story's central message and find which methods the author used to deliver that message.

    Paper Details:

    MLA formatting (Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double spaced, heading in upper left corner, header begins on page two)
    Creative opener (attention-grabbing hook); connecting sentences leading up to thesis; thesis is last sentence of intro
    Multiple body paragraphs.  Each one considers a different aspect of the paper.  Paragraphs should have good topic sentences, textual evidence, primary source citation, analysis, and some type of transition (this could actually either come at the beginning of the paragraph or at the end)
    Conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis.  Conclusion should extend the topic in some way.

    **## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx**

    ## MarTasia Hardy Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    Professor April McKnight

    English 101

    9 July 2025

    **Thesis Statement:**

    In The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses the narrator’s mental decline and the symbolism of the wallpaper to illustrate how the oppression and isolation of women worsen their mental health. The story reveals the damaging effects of controlling women and neglecting their experiences.

    **Topic Sentence 1:**

    Gilman shows the narrator’s mental decline through her changing thoughts and behavior which highlights the effects of isolation and control.

    · The narrator starts out mildly anxious but becomes paranoid and obsessed as the story progresses.

    · Her husband, John, controls every part of her life, including her thoughts, treatment, and physical space.

    · The more she is isolated and ignored, the more her sense of self falls apart.

    **Topic Sentence 2:**

    The wallpaper serves as a symbol of the narrator’s trapped mind and the restrictions placed on women in society.

    · The tangled, ugly pattern reflects the narrator’s mental confusion and feeling of being stuck.

    · She imagines a woman trapped behind the wallpaper, symbolizing herself and other women in her position.

    · Tearing down the wallpaper becomes her way of fighting back against her oppression.

    **Topic Sentence 3:**

    By combining the narrator’s characterization and the wallpaper’s symbolism, Gilman critiques how society’s treatment of women’s mental health can cause real harm.

    · The “rest cure” treatment ignores the narrator’s real needs and leads to a breakdown.

    · No one listens to her when she says she’s not getting better, showing how women’s voices were silenced.

    · Gilman uses this story to push back against a system that traps women instead of helping them heal.

    **Closing Sentence**

    Through powerful symbolism and a raw portrayal of mental decline, The Yellow Wallpaper warns against the dangers of silencing women and ignoring their struggles. Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    **## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx**

    ## MarTasia Hardy Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    Professor April McKnight

    English 101

    9 July 2025

    **Thesis Statement:**

    In The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses the narrator’s mental decline and the symbolism of the wallpaper to illustrate how the oppression and isolation of women worsen their mental health. The story reveals the damaging effects of controlling women and neglecting their experiences.

    **Topic Sentence 1:**

    Gilman shows the narrator’s mental decline through her changing thoughts and behavior which highlights the effects of isolation and control.

    · The narrator starts out mildly anxious but becomes paranoid and obsessed as the story progresses.

    · Her husband, John, controls every part of her life, including her thoughts, treatment, and physical space.

    · The more she is isolated and ignored, the more her sense of self falls apart.

    **Topic Sentence 2:**

    The wallpaper serves as a symbol of the narrator’s trapped mind and the restrictions placed on women in society.

    · The tangled, ugly pattern reflects the narrator’s mental confusion and feeling of being stuck.

    · She imagines a woman trapped behind the wallpaper, symbolizing herself and other women in her position.

    · Tearing down the wallpaper becomes her way of fighting back against her oppression.

    **Topic Sentence 3:**

    By combining the narrator’s characterization and the wallpaper’s symbolism, Gilman critiques how society’s treatment of women’s mental health can cause real harm.

    · The “rest cure” treatment ignores the narrator’s real needs and leads to a breakdown.

    · No one listens to her when she says she’s not getting better, showing how women’s voices were silenced.

    · Gilman uses this story to push back against a system that traps women instead of helping them heal.

    **Closing Sentence**

    Through powerful symbolism and a raw portrayal of mental decline, The Yellow Wallpaper warns against the dangers of silencing women and ignoring their struggles. Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    **## literature.docx**

    With this paper, you will analyze a short story of your choice and divulge the hidden meaning(s) found in the text.

    You may choose any of the essays on this link (or another scholarly work of your choosing):
    [Short Story ChoicesLinks to an external site.](https://lithub.com/43-of-the-most-iconic-short-stories-in-the-english-language/)

    Address the following prompt:

    What is the message of the story you chose? What techniques or strategies does the writer use to deliver the message? Please use the worksheet you completed in Learning Activity #1 to help you determine the techniques.

    For example, did the author use foreshadowing, figurative language, suspense, etc.  to help deliver the message? Did the author use characterization to help deliver the message? Did the author use the sequence of events to deliver the message?

    When writing this paper, you need to focus on one or two strategies. The main purpose of this paper is the determine whether you can figure out the story's central message and find which methods the author used to deliver that message.

    Paper Details:

    MLA formatting (Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double spaced, heading in upper left corner, header begins on page two)
    Creative opener (attention-grabbing hook); connecting sentences leading up to thesis; thesis is last sentence of intro
    Multiple body paragraphs.  Each one considers a different aspect of the paper.  Paragraphs should have good topic sentences, textual evidence, primary source citation, analysis, and some type of transition (this could actually either come at the beginning of the paragraph or at the end)
    Conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis.  Conclusion should extend the topic in some way.

    **## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx**

    ## MarTasia Hardy Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    Professor April McKnight

    English 101

    9 July 2025

    **Thesis Statement:**

    In The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses the narrator’s mental decline and the symbolism of the wallpaper to illustrate how the oppression and isolation of women worsen their mental health. The story reveals the damaging effects of controlling women and neglecting their experiences.

    **Topic Sentence 1:**

    Gilman shows the narrator’s mental decline through her changing thoughts and behavior which highlights the effects of isolation and control.

    · The narrator starts out mildly anxious but becomes paranoid and obsessed as the story progresses.

    · Her husband, John, controls every part of her life, including her thoughts, treatment, and physical space.

    · The more she is isolated and ignored, the more her sense of self falls apart.

    **Topic Sentence 2:**

    The wallpaper serves as a symbol of the narrator’s trapped mind and the restrictions placed on women in society.

    · The tangled, ugly pattern reflects the narrator’s mental confusion and feeling of being stuck.

    · She imagines a woman trapped behind the wallpaper, symbolizing herself and other women in her position.

    · Tearing down the wallpaper becomes her way of fighting back against her oppression.

    **Topic Sentence 3:**

    By combining the narrator’s characterization and the wallpaper’s symbolism, Gilman critiques how society’s treatment of women’s mental health can cause real harm.

    · The “rest cure” treatment ignores the narrator’s real needs and leads to a breakdown.

    · No one listens to her when she says she’s not getting better, showing how women’s voices were silenced.

    · Gilman uses this story to push back against a system that traps women instead of helping them heal.

    **Closing Sentence**

    Through powerful symbolism and a raw portrayal of mental decline, The Yellow Wallpaper warns against the dangers of silencing women and ignoring their struggles. Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    **## literature.docx**

    With this paper, you will analyze a short story of your choice and divulge the hidden meaning(s) found in the text.

    You may choose any of the essays on this link (or another scholarly work of your choosing):
    [Short Story ChoicesLinks to an external site.](https://lithub.com/43-of-the-most-iconic-short-stories-in-the-english-language/)

    Address the following prompt:

    What is the message of the story you chose? What techniques or strategies does the writer use to deliver the message? Please use the worksheet you completed in Learning Activity #1 to help you determine the techniques.

    For example, did the author use foreshadowing, figurative language, suspense, etc.  to help deliver the message? Did the author use characterization to help deliver the message? Did the author use the sequence of events to deliver the message?

    When writing this paper, you need to focus on one or two strategies. The main purpose of this paper is the determine whether you can figure out the story's central message and find which methods the author used to deliver that message.

    Paper Details:

    MLA formatting (Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double spaced, heading in upper left corner, header begins on page two)
    Creative opener (attention-grabbing hook); connecting sentences leading up to thesis; thesis is last sentence of intro
    Multiple body paragraphs.  Each one considers a different aspect of the paper.  Paragraphs should have good topic sentences, textual evidence, primary source citation, analysis, and some type of transition (this could actually either come at the beginning of the paragraph or at the end)
    Conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis.  Conclusion should extend the topic in some way.

    **## ExtendedParagraphPlan_Heading2new.docx**

    ## MarTasia Hardy Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    Professor April McKnight

    English 101

    9 July 2025

    **Thesis Statement:**

    In The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses the narrator’s mental decline and the symbolism of the wallpaper to illustrate how the oppression and isolation of women worsen their mental health. The story reveals the damaging effects of controlling women and neglecting their experiences.

    **Topic Sentence 1:**

    Gilman shows the narrator’s mental decline through her changing thoughts and behavior which highlights the effects of isolation and control.

    · The narrator starts out mildly anxious but becomes paranoid and obsessed as the story progresses.

    · Her husband, John, controls every part of her life, including her thoughts, treatment, and physical space.

    · The more she is isolated and ignored, the more her sense of self falls apart.

    **Topic Sentence 2:**

    The wallpaper serves as a symbol of the narrator’s trapped mind and the restrictions placed on women in society.

    · The tangled, ugly pattern reflects the narrator’s mental confusion and feeling of being stuck.

    · She imagines a woman trapped behind the wallpaper, symbolizing herself and other women in her position.

    · Tearing down the wallpaper becomes her way of fighting back against her oppression.

    **Topic Sentence 3:**

    By combining the narrator’s characterization and the wallpaper’s symbolism, Gilman critiques how society’s treatment of women’s mental health can cause real harm.

    · The “rest cure” treatment ignores the narrator’s real needs and leads to a breakdown.

    · No one listens to her when she says she’s not getting better, showing how women’s voices were silenced.

    · Gilman uses this story to push back against a system that traps women instead of helping them heal.

    **Closing Sentence**

    Through powerful symbolism and a raw portrayal of mental decline, The Yellow Wallpaper warns against the dangers of silencing women and ignoring their struggles. Comment by MarTasia Hardy: I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm, organize my ideas, and refine my thesis and topic sentences. All analysis and final writing decisions are my own.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] The Entity Relationship Model

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Defining relationships within a database can improve search capabilities and optimal performance of the database in the long run. – Identify at least two relationship strength types that can be used within the entity relationship model. – Provide a real-world scenario that demonstrates each relation…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Defining relationships within a database can improve search capabilities and optimal performance of the database in the long run.
    – Identify at least two relationship strength types that can be used within the entity relationship model.
    – Provide a real-world scenario that demonstrates each relationship strength classification, using the classifications.

  • [Solved] Follow the instructions attached, support your response with references no older than 5 years old,.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LgVrfEQWE8 – ## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx – DNPEssentials.pdf **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-suppor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LgVrfEQWE8

    – ## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx

    – DNPEssentials.pdf

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] ENG 190 Module Two Journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Directions In this journal assignment, you will start by reiterating your topic and research question and identifying your audience. Then, you will share two sources from your independent research and examine them for bias. Specifically, you must address the following: 1. **List** credible and re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Directions
    In this journal assignment, you will start by reiterating your topic and research question and identifying your audience. Then, you will share two sources from your independent research and examine them for bias.
    Specifically, you must address the following:
    1. **List** credible and relevant **sources** you found in the Shapiro Library during your independent research.
    1. Include two sources that you find from your independent research.
    2. Include the link to both sources. Alternatively, you can practice using attribution conventions to cite sources by writing a citation for each source using APA or MLA conventions. While you will not be graded on the accuracy of this citation, this is a great opportunity to practice citing sources using the citation format you chose to use in this course. Remember, you will need to use the format you chose in Module One for the duration of the course, including all assignments and the project.
    2. **Evaluate** your **sources**.
    1. Describe how each source supports your topic and how it can help answer your research question.
    2. Discuss why you trust the credibility of your sources and/or what questions or doubts you have about the information presented in your sources.
    3. Discuss how you think your audience will view the credibility of your sources for your argument.
    3. **Explain the bias** found in each source.
    1. Explain how the bias or lack of bias in each source impacts your argument.
    2. Explain how you think your audience will respond to the bias or lack of bias in each source.
    ## What to Submit
    Submit your journal as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to either APA style or MLA style.
    PLEASE USE TOPICS FROM THE BELOW ATTACHMENT!!
    \
    ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eng190projectresourcesdocument-pdf-10352081 "ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf")

  • [Solved] Draft Part One: Collection of Sources

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Overview PLEASE UTILIZE THE BELOW ATTACHMENTS IN REGARD TO THIS ASSIGNMENT – ## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx – ## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarMLA.docx – ## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarAPA.docx – ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf **## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx** **INTRU…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Overview
    PLEASE UTILIZE THE BELOW ATTACHMENTS IN REGARD TO THIS ASSIGNMENT

    – ## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx

    – ## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarMLA.docx

    – ## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarAPA.docx

    – ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf

    **## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **INTRUCTIONS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT**

    **Directions**

    **In this assignment, you will compile your research by providing three sources that support your topic. You will also provide your revised research question. You may refer to the Module Three Project Draft exemplars located in the Supporting Materials section for an example of how to complete this assignment. Please note that there are two versions of this exemplar: one is specific to MLA format, and one is specific to APA format.**

    **Specifically, you must address the following:**

    Specifically, you must address the following:

    1. State the
    **purpose** of your research.

    2. Consider the purpose of your research in relation to your topic.

    3. State your
    **research question**.

    4. State your revised research question.

    5. Based on your research, what is your potential answer to your question? Considering the potential answer to your research question now will help you write a thesis statement for your persuasive essay in a future assignment. The thesis statement will be an essential part of your essay.

    6. Describe the impact of using
    **biased sources** to support your topic.

    7. How does the presence of bias in your sources impact your argument?

    8. Describe how
    **diverse perspectives** from sources support your position. Consider the following:

    9. Are there multiple voices?

    10. How do these diverse perspectives from your research support your topic?

    11. List
    **relevant sources** to support your persuasive essay.

    12. Include at least one source from the Project Resources Document and at least two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library.

    13. Include an APA or MLA citation for each source. Remember, you will need to use the format you chose in Module One for the duration of the course, including all assignments and the project.

    14. Describe how each source
    **supports** your topic.

    15. Briefly summarize each source.

    16. State why the source is credible.

    17. State how the source is relevant to your research question.

    **What to Submit**

    Submit your assignment as a 2- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA or MLA style.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarMLA.docx**

    Stu Dent

    Professor _____

    ENG 190

    4 January 2023

    **[Use a header instead of a title page for MLA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ## Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, Carmen. “Adjunct Professors: Jobs Are Low on Pay and Health Benefits With High COVID Risk.”
    _KFF Health News,_ 23 July 2020, khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk.

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance. While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author's information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, Geoff. “Legislative High and Low for Part-Time Faculty: Healthcare Funding Increased in State Budget, but Higher Workload Cap Vetoed.”
    _California Federation of Teachers,_ 13 Oct. 2022, www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty.

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, Jonathan. “What Adjuncts Need.”
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education,_ vol. 61, no. 26, 2015. ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site.

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarAPA.docx**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    Stu Dent

    Southern New Hampshire University

    ENG 190: Research and Persuasion

    Professor _____

    January 4, 2023

    **[Be sure to include a title page for APA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ### Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, C. (2020, July 23).
    _Adjunct professors: Jobs are low on pay and health benefits with high COVID risk_. KFF Health News. https://khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk/

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance.
    While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author’s information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, G. (2022, October 13).
    _Legislative high and low for part-time faculty: Healthcare funding increased in state budget, but higher workload cap vetoed_. California Federation of Teachers. https://www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, J. (2015). What adjuncts need.
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_,
    _61_(26). https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site
    **[Note the italics in this resource listing. Because the source is an online periodical, the journal title can be italicized instead of the article title.]**

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eng190projectresourcesdocument-pdf-10352089)

    **ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eng190projectresourcesdocument-pdf-10352089)

    **## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **INTRUCTIONS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT**

    **Directions**

    **In this assignment, you will compile your research by providing three sources that support your topic. You will also provide your revised research question. You may refer to the Module Three Project Draft exemplars located in the Supporting Materials section for an example of how to complete this assignment. Please note that there are two versions of this exemplar: one is specific to MLA format, and one is specific to APA format.**

    **Specifically, you must address the following:**

    Specifically, you must address the following:

    1. State the
    **purpose** of your research.

    2. Consider the purpose of your research in relation to your topic.

    3. State your
    **research question**.

    4. State your revised research question.

    5. Based on your research, what is your potential answer to your question? Considering the potential answer to your research question now will help you write a thesis statement for your persuasive essay in a future assignment. The thesis statement will be an essential part of your essay.

    6. Describe the impact of using
    **biased sources** to support your topic.

    7. How does the presence of bias in your sources impact your argument?

    8. Describe how
    **diverse perspectives** from sources support your position. Consider the following:

    9. Are there multiple voices?

    10. How do these diverse perspectives from your research support your topic?

    11. List
    **relevant sources** to support your persuasive essay.

    12. Include at least one source from the Project Resources Document and at least two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library.

    13. Include an APA or MLA citation for each source. Remember, you will need to use the format you chose in Module One for the duration of the course, including all assignments and the project.

    14. Describe how each source
    **supports** your topic.

    15. Briefly summarize each source.

    16. State why the source is credible.

    17. State how the source is relevant to your research question.

    **What to Submit**

    Submit your assignment as a 2- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA or MLA style.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarMLA.docx**

    Stu Dent

    Professor _____

    ENG 190

    4 January 2023

    **[Use a header instead of a title page for MLA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ## Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, Carmen. “Adjunct Professors: Jobs Are Low on Pay and Health Benefits With High COVID Risk.”
    _KFF Health News,_ 23 July 2020, khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk.

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance. While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author's information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, Geoff. “Legislative High and Low for Part-Time Faculty: Healthcare Funding Increased in State Budget, but Higher Workload Cap Vetoed.”
    _California Federation of Teachers,_ 13 Oct. 2022, www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty.

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, Jonathan. “What Adjuncts Need.”
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education,_ vol. 61, no. 26, 2015. ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site.

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarAPA.docx**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    Stu Dent

    Southern New Hampshire University

    ENG 190: Research and Persuasion

    Professor _____

    January 4, 2023

    **[Be sure to include a title page for APA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ### Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, C. (2020, July 23).
    _Adjunct professors: Jobs are low on pay and health benefits with high COVID risk_. KFF Health News. https://khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk/

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance.
    While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author’s information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, G. (2022, October 13).
    _Legislative high and low for part-time faculty: Healthcare funding increased in state budget, but higher workload cap vetoed_. California Federation of Teachers. https://www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, J. (2015). What adjuncts need.
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_,
    _61_(26). https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site
    **[Note the italics in this resource listing. Because the source is an online periodical, the journal title can be italicized instead of the article title.]**

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eng190projectresourcesdocument-pdf-10352089)

    **## MODULE3INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **INTRUCTIONS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT**

    **Directions**

    **In this assignment, you will compile your research by providing three sources that support your topic. You will also provide your revised research question. You may refer to the Module Three Project Draft exemplars located in the Supporting Materials section for an example of how to complete this assignment. Please note that there are two versions of this exemplar: one is specific to MLA format, and one is specific to APA format.**

    **Specifically, you must address the following:**

    Specifically, you must address the following:

    1. State the
    **purpose** of your research.

    2. Consider the purpose of your research in relation to your topic.

    3. State your
    **research question**.

    4. State your revised research question.

    5. Based on your research, what is your potential answer to your question? Considering the potential answer to your research question now will help you write a thesis statement for your persuasive essay in a future assignment. The thesis statement will be an essential part of your essay.

    6. Describe the impact of using
    **biased sources** to support your topic.

    7. How does the presence of bias in your sources impact your argument?

    8. Describe how
    **diverse perspectives** from sources support your position. Consider the following:

    9. Are there multiple voices?

    10. How do these diverse perspectives from your research support your topic?

    11. List
    **relevant sources** to support your persuasive essay.

    12. Include at least one source from the Project Resources Document and at least two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library.

    13. Include an APA or MLA citation for each source. Remember, you will need to use the format you chose in Module One for the duration of the course, including all assignments and the project.

    14. Describe how each source
    **supports** your topic.

    15. Briefly summarize each source.

    16. State why the source is credible.

    17. State how the source is relevant to your research question.

    **What to Submit**

    Submit your assignment as a 2- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA or MLA style.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarMLA.docx**

    Stu Dent

    Professor _____

    ENG 190

    4 January 2023

    **[Use a header instead of a title page for MLA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ## Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, Carmen. “Adjunct Professors: Jobs Are Low on Pay and Health Benefits With High COVID Risk.”
    _KFF Health News,_ 23 July 2020, khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk.

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance. While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author's information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, Geoff. “Legislative High and Low for Part-Time Faculty: Healthcare Funding Increased in State Budget, but Higher Workload Cap Vetoed.”
    _California Federation of Teachers,_ 13 Oct. 2022, www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty.

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, Jonathan. “What Adjuncts Need.”
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education,_ vol. 61, no. 26, 2015. ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site.

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **## ENG190ModuleThreeCollectionofSourcesExemplarAPA.docx**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    Stu Dent

    Southern New Hampshire University

    ENG 190: Research and Persuasion

    Professor _____

    January 4, 2023

    **[Be sure to include a title page for APA.]**

    ## Project Part One: Collection of Sources

    The purpose of my research is to investigate potential funding for part-time faculty healthcare at California community colleges. I am interested in this topic because I think that teachers should have employer-provided healthcare. The research I do will inform me about the current situation and potential funding sources
    **[The purpose of the research is identified.]**, and will help me to develop an argument as to why and how districts should provide healthcare for part-time faculty.
    **[The final sentence identified the reason for interest in the topic and how the research will support the writing process.]**

    My revised research question is: What should community college districts do to overcome healthcare inequity among part-time faculty?
    **[Note that the research question has been revised.]**

    My potential answer to my research question, based on my research, is that community college districts must provide healthcare to their part-time faculty at the same level and employee cost as their full-time faculty, because the health of part-time faculty is very important to the stability of the college, the state offers reimbursement for these costs, and healthcare is a human right.
    **[The answer to the research question should include strong, specific detail. Additionally, the answer to the research question should take a stance on the issue and provide reasons for the stance.]**

    In my essay, I will use some sources from faculty unions and organizations. These sources are biased in that they advocate for faculty; however, they are also respected organizations that have been able to make improvements for faculty in a variety of ways over the years. They are respected by both faculty and district administration. I will also use more neutral sources about potential state funding related to part-time faculty healthcare and news articles on the state of adjunct healthcare access.
    **[Note the detailed explanation about the types of sources that have been selected.]** Using both the biased and the more neutral sources will support my argument by showing what has been done and what is reasonable.
    **[The description includes information about the bias that is present in the sources and how this bias impacts the sources.]**

    Diverse perspectives from my research will help me to see multiple perspectives on this topic. Instead of choosing three sources from faculty unions or faculty organizations, I will also include sources from an academic journal and a health news outlet to better understand different perspectives on the topic.

    ### Sources

    Heredia Rodriguez, C. (2020, July 23).
    _Adjunct professors: Jobs are low on pay and health benefits with high COVID risk_. KFF Health News. https://khn.org/news/adjunct-professors-jobs-are-low-on-pay-and-health-benefits-with-high-covid-risk/

    This article on the KFF Health News website reports on the conditions of employment adjunct faculty faced when returning to campus after COVID.
    **[Be sure to start the resource description with a summary of the article.]** It notes that many adjunct faculty do not have health insurance provided through their employer, and they also cannot afford private health insurance.
    While they might be able to negotiate more online classes, they might be too concerned about their job security to push their districts for accommodations due to health concerns.
    **[The resource description should also include specific references to content from the source and how this relates to your argument.]**

    This article is credible because it is published by KFF Health News, a news outlet that focuses on healthcare-related news. The author is an up-and-coming journalist who regularly reports for KFF Health News on a variety of health-focused topics.
    **[These statements evaluate the credibility of the article and indicate why the author’s information is considered reliable.]** Although this article is focused on the COVID situation in 2020, it provides information about the state of adjunct faculty’s access to healthcare that has not changed much since 2020.
    **[In terms of formatting, note how this section is indented beyond the resource listing.]**

    This source is relevant to my research question because it directly addresses the working conditions of adjuncts in relation to their health and healthcare. It argues that adjunct faculty are at risk by not having access to healthcare.
    **[Be sure to include a specific statement of relevance and how the source addresses information that will support your stance.]**

    Johnson, G. (2022, October 13).
    _Legislative high and low for part-time faculty: Healthcare funding increased in state budget, but higher workload cap vetoed_. California Federation of Teachers. https://www.cft.org/article/legislative-high-and-low-part-time-faculty

    This article outlines the recently passed California state legislation that would provide 100% funding for community colleges specifically to provide healthcare for adjunct faculty. It also outlines the criteria that districts would need to meet in order to receive this funding. It also discusses the work that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) has been doing to advocate at the state level for improvements for adjuncts.

    This source is credible because it is published by CFT, which was active in the creation and passing of the bill. CFT represents California community college part-time faculty. The author is part-time faculty at two California community colleges, and he is on the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it clearly explains new legislation that will fund healthcare for part-time faculty, and the criteria that the college districts will need to meet in order to receive this funding.

    Karpf, J. (2015). What adjuncts need.
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_,
    _61_(26). https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.406082035&site=eds-live&scope=site
    **[Note the italics in this resource listing. Because the source is an online periodical, the journal title can be italicized instead of the article title.]**

    This article outlines the state of adjuncts and provides statistics about adjuncts from a cited report by Coalition on the Academic Workforce. The article also outlines four things that adjuncts need. These are job security, a living wage, health and retirement benefits, and basic institutional support like office space. The article advocates that positive change is possible for adjuncts and lists some of the changes that the unions have successfully negotiated since the 1990s.

    This source is credible because the author is the associate vice president of the CFA. He cites his statistics on the adjunct workforce in the article. This article is also published in
    _The Chronicle of Higher Education_, which is an academic news source for topics pertaining to higher education. Although the statistics cited might now be out of date, the list of four things that adjuncts need, including healthcare, are still relevant in 2023.

    This source is relevant to my topic because it provides statistics about the adjunct workforce and argues for the needs of adjuncts. It also argues that positive change is possible for adjunct faculty.

    **ENG190ProjectResourcesDocument.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eng190projectresourcesdocument-pdf-10352089)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx** New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx

    **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

    **NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

    **NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx** ### Case Case Study Analysis Study Analysis ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729) An understanding of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx

    **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

    ### Case Case Study Analysis

    Study Analysis

    ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729)

    An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    By day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 8.**

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

    ### Case Case Study Analysis

    Study Analysis

    ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729)

    An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    By day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 8.**

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3discussioninstructions.docx **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx** Module 3 Discussion Pico question: In adults diagnosed with Histrionic Personality Disorder receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy compared to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy affect em…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3discussioninstructions.docx

    **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx**

    Module 3 Discussion

    Pico question: In adults diagnosed with Histrionic Personality Disorder receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy compared to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy affect emotional regulation?

    You must include you pico in each discussion and the academic abstract. Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928665)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928665)**_Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria_**

    After studying
    [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/47535/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:

    ·

    1. Describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria used to fine-tune the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question using the table below.  See the example below:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Database Searched** | **Search Terms / Keywords** | **Boolean Operators Used** | **Limits / Filters Applied** | **Number of Results Found** |
    | PubMed | “generalized anxiety disorder” AND “DBT” | AND | Published in the last 5 years; English only | 182 |
    | CINAHL | “depression” OR “major depressive disorder” AND “benzodiazepines” | OR, AND | Adults; peer-reviewed; English | 245 |

    · 2.  Discuss the databases searched and the process used to gather the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question.

    · 3.  Full points for the main issues section of the rubric will be given for including:

    .
    **Database Searched**
    List each database used (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).

    .
    **Search Terms / Keywords**
    Include specific keywords or subject headings used for your search.

    .
    **Boolean Operators Used**
    Note how you combined terms (e.g., AND, OR, NOT).

    .
    **Limits / Filters Applied**
    Describe any filters (e.g., date range, language, human subjects, age group).

    .
    **Number of Results Found**
    Report how many articles were retrieved in each search.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    . Your initial post, question 2, should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.

    . Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old. Visit
    [Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.

    . Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster.

    . Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.

    . Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    . You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points. (1 point per response)

    . All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    . Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    . You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

    · Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Discussion Rubric** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **Distinguished – 4 points** Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic. | **Excellent – 3 points** Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be. | **Fair – 1-2 points** Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given. | **Poor – 0 points** Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. | 4 points |
    | APA Formatting Guidelines | **Distinguished – 2 points** The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Excellent – 1 point** The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Poor – 0 points** The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. | 2 points |
    | Writing Mechanics | **Distinguished – 2 points** Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. | **Excellent – 1 point** Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | **Poor – 0 points** The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | 2 points |
    | Response to Posts of Peers | **Distinguished – 2 points** Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. | **Fair – 1 point** Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. | **Poor – 0 points** Provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 points |
    | **Total Points** | **10** |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx**

    Module 3 Discussion

    Pico question: In adults diagnosed with Histrionic Personality Disorder receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy compared to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy affect emotional regulation?

    You must include you pico in each discussion and the academic abstract. Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928665)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928665)**_Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria_**

    After studying
    [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/47535/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:

    ·

    1. Describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria used to fine-tune the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question using the table below.  See the example below:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Database Searched** | **Search Terms / Keywords** | **Boolean Operators Used** | **Limits / Filters Applied** | **Number of Results Found** |
    | PubMed | “generalized anxiety disorder” AND “DBT” | AND | Published in the last 5 years; English only | 182 |
    | CINAHL | “depression” OR “major depressive disorder” AND “benzodiazepines” | OR, AND | Adults; peer-reviewed; English | 245 |

    · 2.  Discuss the databases searched and the process used to gather the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question.

    · 3.  Full points for the main issues section of the rubric will be given for including:

    .
    **Database Searched**
    List each database used (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).

    .
    **Search Terms / Keywords**
    Include specific keywords or subject headings used for your search.

    .
    **Boolean Operators Used**
    Note how you combined terms (e.g., AND, OR, NOT).

    .
    **Limits / Filters Applied**
    Describe any filters (e.g., date range, language, human subjects, age group).

    .
    **Number of Results Found**
    Report how many articles were retrieved in each search.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    . Your initial post, question 2, should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.

    . Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old. Visit
    [Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.

    . Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster.

    . Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.

    . Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    . You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points. (1 point per response)

    . All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    . Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    . You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

    · Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Discussion Rubric** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **Distinguished – 4 points** Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic. | **Excellent – 3 points** Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be. | **Fair – 1-2 points** Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given. | **Poor – 0 points** Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. | 4 points |
    | APA Formatting Guidelines | **Distinguished – 2 points** The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Excellent – 1 point** The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Poor – 0 points** The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. | 2 points |
    | Writing Mechanics | **Distinguished – 2 points** Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. | **Excellent – 1 point** Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | **Poor – 0 points** The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | 2 points |
    | Response to Posts of Peers | **Distinguished – 2 points** Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. | **Fair – 1 point** Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. | **Poor – 0 points** Provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 points |
    | **Total Points** | **10** |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

  • [Solved] 612M3D

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 612M3D.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3discussioninstructions.docx **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx** Module 3 Discussion This is my PICO question In adults with Schizotypal Personality Disorder (STPD) receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to Dialectical Behavior Th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3discussioninstructions.docx

    **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx**

    Module 3 Discussion

    This is my PICO question

    In adults with Schizotypal Personality Disorder (STPD) receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) affect social anxiety symptoms?

    Professor instructions

    You must include it in each discussion and the academic abstract. Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928667)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928667)**_Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria_**

    After studying
    [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/47535/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:

    ·

    1. Describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria used to fine-tune the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question using the table below.  See the example below:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Database Searched** | **Search Terms / Keywords** | **Boolean Operators Used** | **Limits / Filters Applied** | **Number of Results Found** |
    | PubMed | “generalized anxiety disorder” AND “DBT” | AND | Published in the last 5 years; English only | 182 |
    | CINAHL | “depression” OR “major depressive disorder” AND “benzodiazepines” | OR, AND | Adults; peer-reviewed; English | 245 |

    · 2.  Discuss the databases searched and the process used to gather the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question.

    · 3.  Full points for the main issues section of the rubric will be given for including:

    .
    **Database Searched**
    List each database used (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).

    .
    **Search Terms / Keywords**
    Include specific keywords or subject headings used for your search.

    .
    **Boolean Operators Used**
    Note how you combined terms (e.g., AND, OR, NOT).

    .
    **Limits / Filters Applied**
    Describe any filters (e.g., date range, language, human subjects, age group).

    .
    **Number of Results Found**
    Report how many articles were retrieved in each search.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    . Your initial post, question 2, should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.

    . Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old. Visit
    [Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.

    . Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster.

    . Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.

    . Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    . You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points. (1 point per response)

    . All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    . Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    . You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

    · Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Discussion Rubric** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **Distinguished – 4 points** Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic. | **Excellent – 3 points** Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be. | **Fair – 1-2 points** Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given. | **Poor – 0 points** Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. | 4 points |
    | APA Formatting Guidelines | **Distinguished – 2 points** The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Excellent – 1 point** The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Poor – 0 points** The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. | 2 points |
    | Writing Mechanics | **Distinguished – 2 points** Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. | **Excellent – 1 point** Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | **Poor – 0 points** The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | 2 points |
    | Response to Posts of Peers | **Distinguished – 2 points** Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. | **Fair – 1 point** Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. | **Poor – 0 points** Provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 points |
    | **Total Points** | **10** |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3discussioninstructions.docx**

    Module 3 Discussion

    This is my PICO question

    In adults with Schizotypal Personality Disorder (STPD) receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) affect social anxiety symptoms?

    Professor instructions

    You must include it in each discussion and the academic abstract. Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928667)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-20928667)**_Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria_**

    After studying
    [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/47535/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:

    ·

    1. Describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria used to fine-tune the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question using the table below.  See the example below:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Database Searched** | **Search Terms / Keywords** | **Boolean Operators Used** | **Limits / Filters Applied** | **Number of Results Found** |
    | PubMed | “generalized anxiety disorder” AND “DBT” | AND | Published in the last 5 years; English only | 182 |
    | CINAHL | “depression” OR “major depressive disorder” AND “benzodiazepines” | OR, AND | Adults; peer-reviewed; English | 245 |

    · 2.  Discuss the databases searched and the process used to gather the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question.

    · 3.  Full points for the main issues section of the rubric will be given for including:

    .
    **Database Searched**
    List each database used (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).

    .
    **Search Terms / Keywords**
    Include specific keywords or subject headings used for your search.

    .
    **Boolean Operators Used**
    Note how you combined terms (e.g., AND, OR, NOT).

    .
    **Limits / Filters Applied**
    Describe any filters (e.g., date range, language, human subjects, age group).

    .
    **Number of Results Found**
    Report how many articles were retrieved in each search.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    . Your initial post, question 2, should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.

    . Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old. Visit
    [Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.

    . Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster.

    . Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.

    . Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    . You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points. (1 point per response)

    . All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    . Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    . You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

    · Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Discussion Rubric** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **Distinguished – 4 points** Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic. | **Excellent – 3 points** Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be. | **Fair – 1-2 points** Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given. | **Poor – 0 points** Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. | 4 points |
    | APA Formatting Guidelines | **Distinguished – 2 points** The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Excellent – 1 point** The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. | **Poor – 0 points** The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. | 2 points |
    | Writing Mechanics | **Distinguished – 2 points** Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. | **Excellent – 1 point** Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise. | **Fair – 0.5 points** The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | **Poor – 0 points** The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | 2 points |
    | Response to Posts of Peers | **Distinguished – 2 points** Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. | **Fair – 1 point** Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. | **Poor – 0 points** Provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 points |
    | **Total Points** | **10** |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png