Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## HealthISITComponentsAssign.docx
– ## Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf
**## HealthISITComponentsAssign.docx**
Choose a challenge for health information systems that most interests you and write a 750–1,000-word response about how you envision yourself addressing the challenge. Include the following points in your response:
· Define the six major challenges for health information systems.
· Defend where your selected challenge fits into the list of six major challenges for health information systems, and at what perceived priority the selected challenge should be addressed.
· Propose correction of the selected challenge.
· Discuss future challenges related to your suggested correction of the selected challenge.
· Explain how to reduce the negative impact of such a new challenge.
· Conclude with a discussion of the evolution of health information systems and what some of the future challenges may be with the implementation of existing technology in health care.
Use references please
**## Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf**
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Health IS/IT Components – Rubric Total 85 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Six Major Challenges for
Health Information
Systems
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems
0 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is not
included.
6.08 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
7.95 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
9.35 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Selected Challenge
Priority
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed
0 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is not included.
6.08 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is partially
incorporated, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is present, but
only minimal detail or
support is provided.
7.95 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is provided with
appropriate details and
support.
9.35 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Correction of Selected
Challenge
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Future Challenges
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Reduction of Negative
Impact
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge
0 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided.
8.67 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Evolution of Health
Information Systems
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care
0 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is not included.
6.63 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided
with appropriate details
and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
3.32 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
3.82 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
3.32 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
3.82 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
4.42 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
5.1 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
5.78 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
6.8 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
2.76 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
3.19 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
3.61 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
4.25 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
2.76 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
3.19 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
3.61 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
4.25 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf**
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Health IS/IT Components – Rubric Total 85 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Six Major Challenges for
Health Information
Systems
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems
0 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is not
included.
6.08 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
7.95 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
9.35 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Selected Challenge
Priority
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed
0 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is not included.
6.08 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is partially
incorporated, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is present, but
only minimal detail or
support is provided.
7.95 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is provided with
appropriate details and
support.
9.35 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Correction of Selected
Challenge
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Future Challenges
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Reduction of Negative
Impact
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge
0 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided.
8.67 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Evolution of Health
Information Systems
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care
0 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is not included.
6.63 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided
with appropriate details
and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
3.32 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
3.82 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
3.32 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
3.82 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
4.42 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
5.1 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
5.78 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
6.8 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
2.76 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
3.19 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
3.61 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
4.25 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
2.76 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
3.19 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
3.61 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
4.25 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## HealthISITComponentsAssign.docx**
Choose a challenge for health information systems that most interests you and write a 750–1,000-word response about how you envision yourself addressing the challenge. Include the following points in your response:
· Define the six major challenges for health information systems.
· Defend where your selected challenge fits into the list of six major challenges for health information systems, and at what perceived priority the selected challenge should be addressed.
· Propose correction of the selected challenge.
· Discuss future challenges related to your suggested correction of the selected challenge.
· Explain how to reduce the negative impact of such a new challenge.
· Conclude with a discussion of the evolution of health information systems and what some of the future challenges may be with the implementation of existing technology in health care.
Use references please
**## Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf**
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Health IS/IT Components – Rubric Total 85 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Six Major Challenges for
Health Information
Systems
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems
0 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is not
included.
6.08 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
7.95 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
9.35 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Selected Challenge
Priority
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed
0 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is not included.
6.08 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is partially
incorporated, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is present, but
only minimal detail or
support is provided.
7.95 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is provided with
appropriate details and
support.
9.35 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Correction of Selected
Challenge
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Future Challenges
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Reduction of Negative
Impact
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge
0 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided.
8.67 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Evolution of Health
Information Systems
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care
0 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is not included.
6.63 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided
with appropriate details
and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
3.32 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
3.82 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
3.32 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
3.82 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
4.42 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
5.1 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
5.78 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
6.8 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
2.76 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
3.19 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
3.61 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
4.25 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
2.76 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
3.19 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
3.61 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
4.25 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## HealthISITComponentsAssign.docx**
Choose a challenge for health information systems that most interests you and write a 750–1,000-word response about how you envision yourself addressing the challenge. Include the following points in your response:
· Define the six major challenges for health information systems.
· Defend where your selected challenge fits into the list of six major challenges for health information systems, and at what perceived priority the selected challenge should be addressed.
· Propose correction of the selected challenge.
· Discuss future challenges related to your suggested correction of the selected challenge.
· Explain how to reduce the negative impact of such a new challenge.
· Conclude with a discussion of the evolution of health information systems and what some of the future challenges may be with the implementation of existing technology in health care.
Use references please
**## Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf**
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Health IS/IT Components – Rubric Total 85 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Six Major Challenges for
Health Information
Systems
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems
0 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is not
included.
6.08 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
7.95 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
9.35 points
Definition of six major
challenges for health
information systems is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Selected Challenge
Priority
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed
0 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is not included.
6.08 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is partially
incorporated, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.01 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is present, but
only minimal detail or
support is provided.
7.95 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is provided with
appropriate details and
support.
9.35 points
Defense of where selected
challenge fits into list of six
major challenges for health
information systems and at
what priority selected
challenge should be
addressed is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Correction of Selected
Challenge
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Proposal of correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Future Challenges
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge
0 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
partially incorporated, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
present, but only minimal
detail or support is
provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of future
challenges related to
suggested correction of
selected challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Reduction of Negative
Impact
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge
0 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is not
included.
6.63 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
7.65 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided.
8.67 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
provided with appropriate
details and support.
10.2 points
Explanation of how to
reduce the negative impact
of new challenge is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Evolution of Health
Information Systems
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care
0 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is not included.
6.63 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
7.65 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided.
8.67 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is provided
with appropriate details
and support.
10.2 points
Discussion of evolution of
health information systems
including future challenges
in implementation of
existing technology in
health care is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
6/29/25, 1:26 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
3.32 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
3.82 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
3.32 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
3.82 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
4.34 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
5.1 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
4.42 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
5.1 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
5.78 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
6.8 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
2.76 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
3.19 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
3.61 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
4.25 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
2.76 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
3.19 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
3.61 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
4.25 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
– 1
– 2