Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] NU504-6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU504-6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NU505-6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU505-6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NU506-6A

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU506-6A.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Clinical Experience 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ClinicalExperience6.docx **## ClinicalExperience6.docx** **Clinical Experience 6** Describe your clinical experience for this week for a patient with rheumatoid arthritis · Did you face any challenges, any successes? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ClinicalExperience6.docx

    **## ClinicalExperience6.docx**

    **Clinical Experience 6**

    Describe your clinical experience for this week for a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

    · Did you face any challenges, any successes? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnoses with rationales.

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can be beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources other than your textbook.

    **## ClinicalExperience6.docx**

    **Clinical Experience 6**

    Describe your clinical experience for this week for a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

    · Did you face any challenges, any successes? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnoses with rationales.

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can be beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources other than your textbook.

  • [Solved] Supervisory management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Answer each of the following questions. Submit at minimum TWO "full page" and double-spaced paper, Times New Roman 12-point font, APA format.** The problems that supervisors most commonly encountered among employees are absenteeism and tardiness, insubordination and uncooperativeness, alcohol and …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Answer each of the following questions. Submit at minimum TWO "full page" and double-spaced paper, Times New Roman 12-point font, APA format.**
    The problems that supervisors most commonly encountered among employees are absenteeism and tardiness, insubordination and uncooperativeness, alcohol and drug abuse, workplace violence, and theft. Often the most constructive way a supervisor can address a problem behavior is through counseling. Discipline, which is used to prevent employees from breaking rules and to quickly bring about a change in behavior, must be applied in a constructive way also.
    Before administering discipline, supervisors need to have a clear understanding of the situation by knowing all the facts. Disciplining occurs in as many as four progressive steps:  warnings, suspension, demotion, and dismissal. Supervisors must be careful to motivate and correct rather than to generate hostility and resentment. Supervisors must: follow organizational procedures, union requirements, and laws regarding fair employment practices.  Please answer the below questions in 1 to 2-page paper, double spaced, Times New Roman 12, APA format:
    1. List the rights of employees in the discipline process.
    2. What are the important things to remember about criticizing constructively?
    3. What are the benefits of giving an employee decision-making leave

  • [Solved] Assessment 3_6004

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachment for instructions – ## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx – ## 6004_Assessment3_annotated_training_agenda_template1.docx – ## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx **## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachment for instructions

    – ## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx

    – ## 6004_Assessment3_annotated_training_agenda_template1.docx

    – ## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx

    **## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Protecting Patient Privacy**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Protecting Patient Privacy](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2481792500006731) reading list.

    **Healthcare Regulatory Agencies**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Healthcare Regulatory Agencies](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482311750006731) reading list.

    · These resources will further your understanding of the major healthcare regulatory agencies. They include the Joint Commission, CMS, and HHS. Compare the similarities and differences between these three major agencies that directly correlate with regulatory mandates, reimbursement, and accreditation of organizations. Leaders must understand the various requirements for which healthcare organizations are accountable.

    **Quality Improvement**

    Ongoing quality and performance improvement in healthcare is crucial for sustainability. As technology improvements lead to better outcomes, consumer expectations rise. Health literacy has created an informed customer, and the patient experience is a measurement directly related to reimbursement for hospitals and healthcare organizations.

    Performance improvement strategies that have been applicable in manufacturing and automotive industries are now commonplace in healthcare. Leaders must understand their critical role in continuous improvement in their organizations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Quality Improvement](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482312740006731) reading list.

    · These resources will help you gain a better understanding of performance improvement strategies.

    **Ethics**

    Establishing good ethical standards in healthcare organizations and facilities is mandatory to meet compliance with federal and state standards in the treatment of patients and for facility operations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Ethics](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482317870006731) reading list.

    **Presentation Resources**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Presentation Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=3891643260006731).

    ·
    [Using Kaltura](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4533).

    **## 6004_Assessment3_annotated_training_agenda_template1.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)

    ## Annotated Training Agenda

    Objective:

    [Summarize the objective of the training session.]

    Date, Time, Duration:

    [Specify the date, time, and duration of the training session.]
    **Training Agenda**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Training Agenda Outline | Annotation |
    | **Introduction**<br>Welcome and overview of the training session.<br>Importance of [Policy Name] and its impact on patient care and organizational goals. | |
    | Understanding [Policy Name] <br>Brief overview of the policy’s purpose, scope, and objectives.<br>Key provisions and guidelines. | |
    | Roles and Responsibilities<br>Identify the specific roles targeted for pilot implementation (for example, nursing staff, administrative team, physicians).<br>Discuss the responsibilities of each role within the context of [Policy Name].<br>Highlight collaboration and interprofessional communication. | |
    | Training Strategies<br>Brainstorming: Encourage participants to share their insights and questions related to the policy.<br>Group discussions: Facilitate conversations on practical scenarios and case studies.<br>Outlining: Collaboratively create a roadmap for integrating [Policy Name] into daily workflows. | |
    | Q&A and Clarifications<br>Address any participant queries or concerns.<br>Clarify ambiguities related to [Policy Name]. | |
    | Next Steps (15 minutes)<br>Provide resources (for example, policy documents, contact information) for ongoing support.<br>Announce follow-up sessions or additional training opportunities.<br>Express gratitude for participants’ commitment to quality care. | |

    **1 1 **image1.emf****

    **## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Training and educating those within an organization who are responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a healthcare profession must be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them.

    As a master's-level healthcare practitioner, you may be asked to design training sessions to help ensure the smooth implementation of any number of initiatives in your healthcare setting. The ability to create an agenda that will ensure your training goals will be met, and will fit into the allotted time, is a valuable skill for preparing colleagues to be successful in their practice.

    This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement effective educational strategies.

    **Instructions**

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    Use the
    [Annotated Training Agenda Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42142/files/7645573/download) to develop your agenda.

    **Requirements**

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. If using PowerPoint to create your presentation slides, you may use the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX] as a template. Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    What to submit:

    · PowerPoint presentation.

    · Recorded PowerPoint presentation, including audio track.

    · Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes.

    · Understand that the speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

    · Refer to the Presentation Resources for help, along with the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX].

    · Annotated Training Agenda.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Training and educating those within an organization who are responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a healthcare profession must be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them.

    As a master's-level healthcare practitioner, you may be asked to design training sessions to help ensure the smooth implementation of any number of initiatives in your healthcare setting. The ability to create an agenda that will ensure your training goals will be met, and will fit into the allotted time, is a valuable skill for preparing colleagues to be successful in their practice.

    This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement effective educational strategies.

    **Instructions**

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    Use the
    [Annotated Training Agenda Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42142/files/7645573/download) to develop your agenda.

    **Requirements**

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. If using PowerPoint to create your presentation slides, you may use the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX] as a template. Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    What to submit:

    · PowerPoint presentation.

    · Recorded PowerPoint presentation, including audio track.

    · Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes.

    · Understand that the speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

    · Refer to the Presentation Resources for help, along with the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX].

    · Annotated Training Agenda.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Protecting Patient Privacy**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Protecting Patient Privacy](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2481792500006731) reading list.

    **Healthcare Regulatory Agencies**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Healthcare Regulatory Agencies](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482311750006731) reading list.

    · These resources will further your understanding of the major healthcare regulatory agencies. They include the Joint Commission, CMS, and HHS. Compare the similarities and differences between these three major agencies that directly correlate with regulatory mandates, reimbursement, and accreditation of organizations. Leaders must understand the various requirements for which healthcare organizations are accountable.

    **Quality Improvement**

    Ongoing quality and performance improvement in healthcare is crucial for sustainability. As technology improvements lead to better outcomes, consumer expectations rise. Health literacy has created an informed customer, and the patient experience is a measurement directly related to reimbursement for hospitals and healthcare organizations.

    Performance improvement strategies that have been applicable in manufacturing and automotive industries are now commonplace in healthcare. Leaders must understand their critical role in continuous improvement in their organizations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Quality Improvement](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482312740006731) reading list.

    · These resources will help you gain a better understanding of performance improvement strategies.

    **Ethics**

    Establishing good ethical standards in healthcare organizations and facilities is mandatory to meet compliance with federal and state standards in the treatment of patients and for facility operations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Ethics](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482317870006731) reading list.

    **Presentation Resources**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Presentation Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=3891643260006731).

    ·
    [Using Kaltura](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4533).

    **## 6004_Assessment3_annotated_training_agenda_template1.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)

    ## Annotated Training Agenda

    Objective:

    [Summarize the objective of the training session.]

    Date, Time, Duration:

    [Specify the date, time, and duration of the training session.]
    **Training Agenda**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Training Agenda Outline | Annotation |
    | **Introduction**<br>Welcome and overview of the training session.<br>Importance of [Policy Name] and its impact on patient care and organizational goals. | |
    | Understanding [Policy Name] <br>Brief overview of the policy’s purpose, scope, and objectives.<br>Key provisions and guidelines. | |
    | Roles and Responsibilities<br>Identify the specific roles targeted for pilot implementation (for example, nursing staff, administrative team, physicians).<br>Discuss the responsibilities of each role within the context of [Policy Name].<br>Highlight collaboration and interprofessional communication. | |
    | Training Strategies<br>Brainstorming: Encourage participants to share their insights and questions related to the policy.<br>Group discussions: Facilitate conversations on practical scenarios and case studies.<br>Outlining: Collaboratively create a roadmap for integrating [Policy Name] into daily workflows. | |
    | Q&A and Clarifications<br>Address any participant queries or concerns.<br>Clarify ambiguities related to [Policy Name]. | |
    | Next Steps (15 minutes)<br>Provide resources (for example, policy documents, contact information) for ongoing support.<br>Announce follow-up sessions or additional training opportunities.<br>Express gratitude for participants’ commitment to quality care. | |

    **1 1 **image1.emf****

    **## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Training and educating those within an organization who are responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a healthcare profession must be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them.

    As a master's-level healthcare practitioner, you may be asked to design training sessions to help ensure the smooth implementation of any number of initiatives in your healthcare setting. The ability to create an agenda that will ensure your training goals will be met, and will fit into the allotted time, is a valuable skill for preparing colleagues to be successful in their practice.

    This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement effective educational strategies.

    **Instructions**

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    Use the
    [Annotated Training Agenda Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42142/files/7645573/download) to develop your agenda.

    **Requirements**

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. If using PowerPoint to create your presentation slides, you may use the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX] as a template. Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    What to submit:

    · PowerPoint presentation.

    · Recorded PowerPoint presentation, including audio track.

    · Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes.

    · Understand that the speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

    · Refer to the Presentation Resources for help, along with the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX].

    · Annotated Training Agenda.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## 6004_Assessment3_resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Protecting Patient Privacy**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Protecting Patient Privacy](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2481792500006731) reading list.

    **Healthcare Regulatory Agencies**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Healthcare Regulatory Agencies](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482311750006731) reading list.

    · These resources will further your understanding of the major healthcare regulatory agencies. They include the Joint Commission, CMS, and HHS. Compare the similarities and differences between these three major agencies that directly correlate with regulatory mandates, reimbursement, and accreditation of organizations. Leaders must understand the various requirements for which healthcare organizations are accountable.

    **Quality Improvement**

    Ongoing quality and performance improvement in healthcare is crucial for sustainability. As technology improvements lead to better outcomes, consumer expectations rise. Health literacy has created an informed customer, and the patient experience is a measurement directly related to reimbursement for hospitals and healthcare organizations.

    Performance improvement strategies that have been applicable in manufacturing and automotive industries are now commonplace in healthcare. Leaders must understand their critical role in continuous improvement in their organizations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Quality Improvement](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482312740006731) reading list.

    · These resources will help you gain a better understanding of performance improvement strategies.

    **Ethics**

    Establishing good ethical standards in healthcare organizations and facilities is mandatory to meet compliance with federal and state standards in the treatment of patients and for facility operations.

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Ethics](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=2482317870006731) reading list.

    **Presentation Resources**

    ·
    [Assessment 3: Presentation Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2475943070006731?auth=SAML&section=3891643260006731).

    ·
    [Using Kaltura](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4533).

    **## 6004_Assessment3_annotated_training_agenda_template1.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-3-6004)

    ## Annotated Training Agenda

    Objective:

    [Summarize the objective of the training session.]

    Date, Time, Duration:

    [Specify the date, time, and duration of the training session.]
    **Training Agenda**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Training Agenda Outline | Annotation |
    | **Introduction**<br>Welcome and overview of the training session.<br>Importance of [Policy Name] and its impact on patient care and organizational goals. | |
    | Understanding [Policy Name] <br>Brief overview of the policy’s purpose, scope, and objectives.<br>Key provisions and guidelines. | |
    | Roles and Responsibilities<br>Identify the specific roles targeted for pilot implementation (for example, nursing staff, administrative team, physicians).<br>Discuss the responsibilities of each role within the context of [Policy Name].<br>Highlight collaboration and interprofessional communication. | |
    | Training Strategies<br>Brainstorming: Encourage participants to share their insights and questions related to the policy.<br>Group discussions: Facilitate conversations on practical scenarios and case studies.<br>Outlining: Collaboratively create a roadmap for integrating [Policy Name] into daily workflows. | |
    | Q&A and Clarifications<br>Address any participant queries or concerns.<br>Clarify ambiguities related to [Policy Name]. | |
    | Next Steps (15 minutes)<br>Provide resources (for example, policy documents, contact information) for ongoing support.<br>Announce follow-up sessions or additional training opportunities.<br>Express gratitude for participants’ commitment to quality care. | |

    **1 1 **image1.emf****

    **## 6004_Instructions_Assessment3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Training and educating those within an organization who are responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a healthcare profession must be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them.

    As a master's-level healthcare practitioner, you may be asked to design training sessions to help ensure the smooth implementation of any number of initiatives in your healthcare setting. The ability to create an agenda that will ensure your training goals will be met, and will fit into the allotted time, is a valuable skill for preparing colleagues to be successful in their practice.

    This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement effective educational strategies.

    **Instructions**

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    Use the
    [Annotated Training Agenda Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42142/files/7645573/download) to develop your agenda.

    **Requirements**

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. If using PowerPoint to create your presentation slides, you may use the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX] as a template. Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    What to submit:

    · PowerPoint presentation.

    · Recorded PowerPoint presentation, including audio track.

    · Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes.

    · Understand that the speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

    · Refer to the Presentation Resources for help, along with the
    SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX].

    · Annotated Training Agenda.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Synopsis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see notes from teacher to generate a one page synopsis of topic. – ## Synopsis.docx – ## ProfessorT.Feedback.Johnson.docx – ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx **## Synopsis.docx** · **Create a one page synopsis explaining my plan going forward before I continue to keep writing.** Take away from…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see notes from teacher to generate a one page synopsis of topic.

    – ## Synopsis.docx

    – ## ProfessorT.Feedback.Johnson.docx

    – ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx

    **## Synopsis.docx**

    ·
    **Create a one page synopsis explaining my plan going forward before I continue to keep writing.**

    Take away from meeting with teacher:

    · Too many ideas and the focus isn’t there I should narrow down to one topic incorporate with what I already done and switch the dynamic to one thing.

    · Use ProQuest and google scholar and search for articles related to the performance management within HR and replicate study but make it your own. Use that to incorporate categories and make sure you can find something with scales that important for the topic (contact companies if you need to). Incorporate scale development and data collection for topic. Use this article to create levels i.e. Managers and employees (emphasized you can probably get more out of the employee level.

    · Some categories could be: high performers, performance evaluation, training compliance, and employee satisfaction…or whatever else you can come up with.

    · Discuss TAM briefly (including someone’s comfort with a computer.

    · Take TAM and apply it to AI setting seem to peak his interest he said that will be fun and interesting to see because he haven’t seen that.

    · Improvise dependent, independent, and measure (what do we want to predict)

    · If possible find out who use AI throughout their hiring process and what the difference is before and after usage.

    · A few question ideas: How are managers using Ai? Computer literacy and what type of AI are they using? Like is it something already generated or something they generate? How extensive have you trained? What do you use AI for? And how long have you been using it?

    · Where would we get data?

    · Analysis, what’s out there, measures, and talent management….

    · Training of a model and if it’s accurate.

    · The draft have to be close to defensible

    · I’m on cloud level and he wants me on ground. He say we have a lot of good ideas but want it to be as simple as possible.

    · Is Ai accurate with the information given? What is depended?

    · Good ideas but lacking research

    · Improvise regression model

    · Some companies use AI to screen but it sometimes searched for key words (can’t take context well) leaving the company making the wrong decisions based off what they are trained to look for.

    **## ProfessorT.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    ## Key Strengths

    Your work stands out in several important ways:

    **Comprehensive Scope**
    From the opening problem statement to the final methodological design, your study offers a clear and complete roadmap. The progression of ideas is logical, giving readers a strong sense of direction throughout.

    **Solid Theoretical Grounding**
    Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Diffusion of Innovations, and Ethical Decision-Making Theory gives your study a well-rounded, multidisciplinary foundation. This robust theoretical lens supports both your hypothesis development and conceptual framework.

    **Clear Purpose and Structure**

    The study’s aims and objectives are well defined.

    Hypotheses are logically derived from literature.

    The chapter organization—Introduction → Literature Review → Methodology—is textbook-correct and easy to follow.

    **Contextual Richness**
    The introductory discussion effectively sets the stage, tracing the evolution of AI within HR contexts. While examples like “Food Quality 4.0” provide interesting context, they slightly stray from HR-specific themes and could be refocused to maintain thematic alignment.

    **Depth in Literature Review**
    You’ve engaged thoroughly with the existing research, identifying theoretical gaps (e.g., long-term cultural impacts of AI in HR) and showing an understanding of current discourse.

    ## Areas for Refinement and Suggestions

    ### Chapter 1: Introduction

    **Observations:**

    · The background includes interesting but tangential references (e.g., “Food Quality 4.0”) that dilute the focus on HR-specific applications of AI.

    · This reference is peripheral to the core topic of
    **AI in HR decision-making** and is drawn from the food production domain. While it highlights AI’s impact in another industry, its presence here may distract from the HR focus unless the comparison is explicitly justified.

    · There is minimal early framing of the case study organization (Accenture), which would help ground the research problem.

    · The stakeholder scope within the problem statement remains broad and would benefit from greater specificity.

    ·

    **Suggestions:**

    · Move the background content on RPA and "Food Quality 4.0" to the literature review. Replace this with a tighter, HR-specific motivation. For example, cite Unilever’s or IBM’s use of AI in hiring (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2019).

    · Preview the research design earlier so readers understand the empirical context upfront. For instance:
    _“This study centers on Accenture, a multinational consulting firm known for its early adoption of AI in human capital processes.”_

    · Clarify the problem statement by explicitly identifying the primary stakeholders (e.g., line managers, HR partners, or applicants) impacted by AI decisions (Ulrich, 1997).

    ### Chapter 2: Literature Review

    **Observations:**

    · The review covers relevant theories (RBV, TAM, Diffusion, Ethical frameworks) comprehensively but reads as modular rather than integrated.

    · Some redundancy exists, particularly around the stages of adoption (e.g., innovation adoption curve concepts repeated multiple times).

    · There’s an opportunity to strengthen the connection between theories and your conceptual framework.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Add transition paragraphs that link one theory to the next. For example:

    _“Building on TAM, we see how the Diffusion of Innovations framework captures the organization-wide spread of AI adoption beyond initial acceptance, offering a more holistic understanding of AI integration.”_
    (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Rogers, 2003).

    · Condense repetitive content for clarity and efficiency—particularly descriptions of innovation phases and adopter types.

    · Include more recent empirical studies on AI in HR to modernize the review (e.g., Jarrahi, 2018; Tambe et al., 2019).

    ### Chapter 3: Methodology

    **Strengths:**

    · Sampling methods, ethical concerns, and data protection protocols are clearly presented.

    · The focus on Accenture lends specificity to your research and reflects real-world practice.

    **Observations:**

    · The sample size (n=50) is appropriate for exploratory studies but lacks explicit justification.

    · There is no discussion of potential non-response bias, nor mitigation strategies.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Justify your sample size (50 respondents) through a brief statistical rationale or citation. For example:

    _“According to Green (1991), a sample size of N ≥ 50 + 8m is adequate for testing multiple correlations, supporting this study’s design.”_

    · Include a subsection addressing potential non-response bias and any strategies for mitigation (e.g., follow-up emails, reminder notices, or incentives) in line with Dillman et al. (2014).

    ## Conceptual Framework & Hypotheses

    **Feedback:**

    · Your visual model (e.g., Figure 5) is clear and effectively illustrates relationships between independent and dependent variables.

    · The framework accurately reflects the chosen theories and supports the hypothesis development.

    **Suggestions:**

    · While hypotheses are correctly framed in the null form, you might consider offering at least one directional hypothesis. For example:

    _“AI tools significantly improve decision accuracy in performance evaluations.”_
    (Tambe et al., 2019; Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017).

    · Clearly indicate how each hypothesis is linked to a theoretical construct within your conceptual framework to improve alignment and traceability.

    ## Writing, Style, and Consistency

    **Observations:**

    · There are inconsistencies in how AI technologies are referred to—terms like “robotic process automation,” “smart machine learning,” and “AI-based tools” are used interchangeably.

    · Minor grammatical and typographic errors occur throughout the document.

    · APA citation formatting is inconsistently applied.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Choose a consistent term to refer to the technology under study (e.g., “AI technologies”) and define it early in Chapter 1.

    · Conduct a final proofreading pass for grammar, sentence clarity, and academic tone.

    · Ensure all in-text citations and references conform to APA 7th edition guidelines (e.g., use “&” in parenthetical citations, proper use of italics and punctuation).

    **ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professorg-feedback-johnson-docx)

    **ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professorg-feedback-johnson-docx)

    **## Synopsis.docx**

    ·
    **Create a one page synopsis explaining my plan going forward before I continue to keep writing.**

    Take away from meeting with teacher:

    · Too many ideas and the focus isn’t there I should narrow down to one topic incorporate with what I already done and switch the dynamic to one thing.

    · Use ProQuest and google scholar and search for articles related to the performance management within HR and replicate study but make it your own. Use that to incorporate categories and make sure you can find something with scales that important for the topic (contact companies if you need to). Incorporate scale development and data collection for topic. Use this article to create levels i.e. Managers and employees (emphasized you can probably get more out of the employee level.

    · Some categories could be: high performers, performance evaluation, training compliance, and employee satisfaction…or whatever else you can come up with.

    · Discuss TAM briefly (including someone’s comfort with a computer.

    · Take TAM and apply it to AI setting seem to peak his interest he said that will be fun and interesting to see because he haven’t seen that.

    · Improvise dependent, independent, and measure (what do we want to predict)

    · If possible find out who use AI throughout their hiring process and what the difference is before and after usage.

    · A few question ideas: How are managers using Ai? Computer literacy and what type of AI are they using? Like is it something already generated or something they generate? How extensive have you trained? What do you use AI for? And how long have you been using it?

    · Where would we get data?

    · Analysis, what’s out there, measures, and talent management….

    · Training of a model and if it’s accurate.

    · The draft have to be close to defensible

    · I’m on cloud level and he wants me on ground. He say we have a lot of good ideas but want it to be as simple as possible.

    · Is Ai accurate with the information given? What is depended?

    · Good ideas but lacking research

    · Improvise regression model

    · Some companies use AI to screen but it sometimes searched for key words (can’t take context well) leaving the company making the wrong decisions based off what they are trained to look for.

    **## ProfessorT.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    ## Key Strengths

    Your work stands out in several important ways:

    **Comprehensive Scope**
    From the opening problem statement to the final methodological design, your study offers a clear and complete roadmap. The progression of ideas is logical, giving readers a strong sense of direction throughout.

    **Solid Theoretical Grounding**
    Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Diffusion of Innovations, and Ethical Decision-Making Theory gives your study a well-rounded, multidisciplinary foundation. This robust theoretical lens supports both your hypothesis development and conceptual framework.

    **Clear Purpose and Structure**

    The study’s aims and objectives are well defined.

    Hypotheses are logically derived from literature.

    The chapter organization—Introduction → Literature Review → Methodology—is textbook-correct and easy to follow.

    **Contextual Richness**
    The introductory discussion effectively sets the stage, tracing the evolution of AI within HR contexts. While examples like “Food Quality 4.0” provide interesting context, they slightly stray from HR-specific themes and could be refocused to maintain thematic alignment.

    **Depth in Literature Review**
    You’ve engaged thoroughly with the existing research, identifying theoretical gaps (e.g., long-term cultural impacts of AI in HR) and showing an understanding of current discourse.

    ## Areas for Refinement and Suggestions

    ### Chapter 1: Introduction

    **Observations:**

    · The background includes interesting but tangential references (e.g., “Food Quality 4.0”) that dilute the focus on HR-specific applications of AI.

    · This reference is peripheral to the core topic of
    **AI in HR decision-making** and is drawn from the food production domain. While it highlights AI’s impact in another industry, its presence here may distract from the HR focus unless the comparison is explicitly justified.

    · There is minimal early framing of the case study organization (Accenture), which would help ground the research problem.

    · The stakeholder scope within the problem statement remains broad and would benefit from greater specificity.

    ·

    **Suggestions:**

    · Move the background content on RPA and "Food Quality 4.0" to the literature review. Replace this with a tighter, HR-specific motivation. For example, cite Unilever’s or IBM’s use of AI in hiring (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2019).

    · Preview the research design earlier so readers understand the empirical context upfront. For instance:
    _“This study centers on Accenture, a multinational consulting firm known for its early adoption of AI in human capital processes.”_

    · Clarify the problem statement by explicitly identifying the primary stakeholders (e.g., line managers, HR partners, or applicants) impacted by AI decisions (Ulrich, 1997).

    ### Chapter 2: Literature Review

    **Observations:**

    · The review covers relevant theories (RBV, TAM, Diffusion, Ethical frameworks) comprehensively but reads as modular rather than integrated.

    · Some redundancy exists, particularly around the stages of adoption (e.g., innovation adoption curve concepts repeated multiple times).

    · There’s an opportunity to strengthen the connection between theories and your conceptual framework.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Add transition paragraphs that link one theory to the next. For example:

    _“Building on TAM, we see how the Diffusion of Innovations framework captures the organization-wide spread of AI adoption beyond initial acceptance, offering a more holistic understanding of AI integration.”_
    (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Rogers, 2003).

    · Condense repetitive content for clarity and efficiency—particularly descriptions of innovation phases and adopter types.

    · Include more recent empirical studies on AI in HR to modernize the review (e.g., Jarrahi, 2018; Tambe et al., 2019).

    ### Chapter 3: Methodology

    **Strengths:**

    · Sampling methods, ethical concerns, and data protection protocols are clearly presented.

    · The focus on Accenture lends specificity to your research and reflects real-world practice.

    **Observations:**

    · The sample size (n=50) is appropriate for exploratory studies but lacks explicit justification.

    · There is no discussion of potential non-response bias, nor mitigation strategies.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Justify your sample size (50 respondents) through a brief statistical rationale or citation. For example:

    _“According to Green (1991), a sample size of N ≥ 50 + 8m is adequate for testing multiple correlations, supporting this study’s design.”_

    · Include a subsection addressing potential non-response bias and any strategies for mitigation (e.g., follow-up emails, reminder notices, or incentives) in line with Dillman et al. (2014).

    ## Conceptual Framework & Hypotheses

    **Feedback:**

    · Your visual model (e.g., Figure 5) is clear and effectively illustrates relationships between independent and dependent variables.

    · The framework accurately reflects the chosen theories and supports the hypothesis development.

    **Suggestions:**

    · While hypotheses are correctly framed in the null form, you might consider offering at least one directional hypothesis. For example:

    _“AI tools significantly improve decision accuracy in performance evaluations.”_
    (Tambe et al., 2019; Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017).

    · Clearly indicate how each hypothesis is linked to a theoretical construct within your conceptual framework to improve alignment and traceability.

    ## Writing, Style, and Consistency

    **Observations:**

    · There are inconsistencies in how AI technologies are referred to—terms like “robotic process automation,” “smart machine learning,” and “AI-based tools” are used interchangeably.

    · Minor grammatical and typographic errors occur throughout the document.

    · APA citation formatting is inconsistently applied.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Choose a consistent term to refer to the technology under study (e.g., “AI technologies”) and define it early in Chapter 1.

    · Conduct a final proofreading pass for grammar, sentence clarity, and academic tone.

    · Ensure all in-text citations and references conform to APA 7th edition guidelines (e.g., use “&” in parenthetical citations, proper use of italics and punctuation).

    **ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professorg-feedback-johnson-docx)

    **## Synopsis.docx**

    ·
    **Create a one page synopsis explaining my plan going forward before I continue to keep writing.**

    Take away from meeting with teacher:

    · Too many ideas and the focus isn’t there I should narrow down to one topic incorporate with what I already done and switch the dynamic to one thing.

    · Use ProQuest and google scholar and search for articles related to the performance management within HR and replicate study but make it your own. Use that to incorporate categories and make sure you can find something with scales that important for the topic (contact companies if you need to). Incorporate scale development and data collection for topic. Use this article to create levels i.e. Managers and employees (emphasized you can probably get more out of the employee level.

    · Some categories could be: high performers, performance evaluation, training compliance, and employee satisfaction…or whatever else you can come up with.

    · Discuss TAM briefly (including someone’s comfort with a computer.

    · Take TAM and apply it to AI setting seem to peak his interest he said that will be fun and interesting to see because he haven’t seen that.

    · Improvise dependent, independent, and measure (what do we want to predict)

    · If possible find out who use AI throughout their hiring process and what the difference is before and after usage.

    · A few question ideas: How are managers using Ai? Computer literacy and what type of AI are they using? Like is it something already generated or something they generate? How extensive have you trained? What do you use AI for? And how long have you been using it?

    · Where would we get data?

    · Analysis, what’s out there, measures, and talent management….

    · Training of a model and if it’s accurate.

    · The draft have to be close to defensible

    · I’m on cloud level and he wants me on ground. He say we have a lot of good ideas but want it to be as simple as possible.

    · Is Ai accurate with the information given? What is depended?

    · Good ideas but lacking research

    · Improvise regression model

    · Some companies use AI to screen but it sometimes searched for key words (can’t take context well) leaving the company making the wrong decisions based off what they are trained to look for.

    **## ProfessorT.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    ## Key Strengths

    Your work stands out in several important ways:

    **Comprehensive Scope**
    From the opening problem statement to the final methodological design, your study offers a clear and complete roadmap. The progression of ideas is logical, giving readers a strong sense of direction throughout.

    **Solid Theoretical Grounding**
    Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Diffusion of Innovations, and Ethical Decision-Making Theory gives your study a well-rounded, multidisciplinary foundation. This robust theoretical lens supports both your hypothesis development and conceptual framework.

    **Clear Purpose and Structure**

    The study’s aims and objectives are well defined.

    Hypotheses are logically derived from literature.

    The chapter organization—Introduction → Literature Review → Methodology—is textbook-correct and easy to follow.

    **Contextual Richness**
    The introductory discussion effectively sets the stage, tracing the evolution of AI within HR contexts. While examples like “Food Quality 4.0” provide interesting context, they slightly stray from HR-specific themes and could be refocused to maintain thematic alignment.

    **Depth in Literature Review**
    You’ve engaged thoroughly with the existing research, identifying theoretical gaps (e.g., long-term cultural impacts of AI in HR) and showing an understanding of current discourse.

    ## Areas for Refinement and Suggestions

    ### Chapter 1: Introduction

    **Observations:**

    · The background includes interesting but tangential references (e.g., “Food Quality 4.0”) that dilute the focus on HR-specific applications of AI.

    · This reference is peripheral to the core topic of
    **AI in HR decision-making** and is drawn from the food production domain. While it highlights AI’s impact in another industry, its presence here may distract from the HR focus unless the comparison is explicitly justified.

    · There is minimal early framing of the case study organization (Accenture), which would help ground the research problem.

    · The stakeholder scope within the problem statement remains broad and would benefit from greater specificity.

    ·

    **Suggestions:**

    · Move the background content on RPA and "Food Quality 4.0" to the literature review. Replace this with a tighter, HR-specific motivation. For example, cite Unilever’s or IBM’s use of AI in hiring (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2019).

    · Preview the research design earlier so readers understand the empirical context upfront. For instance:
    _“This study centers on Accenture, a multinational consulting firm known for its early adoption of AI in human capital processes.”_

    · Clarify the problem statement by explicitly identifying the primary stakeholders (e.g., line managers, HR partners, or applicants) impacted by AI decisions (Ulrich, 1997).

    ### Chapter 2: Literature Review

    **Observations:**

    · The review covers relevant theories (RBV, TAM, Diffusion, Ethical frameworks) comprehensively but reads as modular rather than integrated.

    · Some redundancy exists, particularly around the stages of adoption (e.g., innovation adoption curve concepts repeated multiple times).

    · There’s an opportunity to strengthen the connection between theories and your conceptual framework.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Add transition paragraphs that link one theory to the next. For example:

    _“Building on TAM, we see how the Diffusion of Innovations framework captures the organization-wide spread of AI adoption beyond initial acceptance, offering a more holistic understanding of AI integration.”_
    (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Rogers, 2003).

    · Condense repetitive content for clarity and efficiency—particularly descriptions of innovation phases and adopter types.

    · Include more recent empirical studies on AI in HR to modernize the review (e.g., Jarrahi, 2018; Tambe et al., 2019).

    ### Chapter 3: Methodology

    **Strengths:**

    · Sampling methods, ethical concerns, and data protection protocols are clearly presented.

    · The focus on Accenture lends specificity to your research and reflects real-world practice.

    **Observations:**

    · The sample size (n=50) is appropriate for exploratory studies but lacks explicit justification.

    · There is no discussion of potential non-response bias, nor mitigation strategies.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Justify your sample size (50 respondents) through a brief statistical rationale or citation. For example:

    _“According to Green (1991), a sample size of N ≥ 50 + 8m is adequate for testing multiple correlations, supporting this study’s design.”_

    · Include a subsection addressing potential non-response bias and any strategies for mitigation (e.g., follow-up emails, reminder notices, or incentives) in line with Dillman et al. (2014).

    ## Conceptual Framework & Hypotheses

    **Feedback:**

    · Your visual model (e.g., Figure 5) is clear and effectively illustrates relationships between independent and dependent variables.

    · The framework accurately reflects the chosen theories and supports the hypothesis development.

    **Suggestions:**

    · While hypotheses are correctly framed in the null form, you might consider offering at least one directional hypothesis. For example:

    _“AI tools significantly improve decision accuracy in performance evaluations.”_
    (Tambe et al., 2019; Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017).

    · Clearly indicate how each hypothesis is linked to a theoretical construct within your conceptual framework to improve alignment and traceability.

    ## Writing, Style, and Consistency

    **Observations:**

    · There are inconsistencies in how AI technologies are referred to—terms like “robotic process automation,” “smart machine learning,” and “AI-based tools” are used interchangeably.

    · Minor grammatical and typographic errors occur throughout the document.

    · APA citation formatting is inconsistently applied.

    **Suggestions:**

    · Choose a consistent term to refer to the technology under study (e.g., “AI technologies”) and define it early in Chapter 1.

    · Conduct a final proofreading pass for grammar, sentence clarity, and academic tone.

    · Ensure all in-text citations and references conform to APA 7th edition guidelines (e.g., use “&” in parenthetical citations, proper use of italics and punctuation).

    **ProfessorG.Feedback.Johnson.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professorg-feedback-johnson-docx)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] 623 asssg 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Review Chapter 11 and 12 from your textbook, _Applied Psychology in Talent Management_. – Review Chapters 6 and 8 from the book [_Business Ethics and Rational Corporate Policies: Leveraging Human Resources in Organizations_Links to an external site.](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-e…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Review Chapter 11 and 12 from your textbook, _Applied Psychology in Talent Management_.
    – Review Chapters 6 and 8 from the book [_Business Ethics and Rational Corporate Policies: Leveraging Human Resources in Organizations_Links to an external site.](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=6362839).
    – Review the article [No Obstacles: Opportunities and Strategies for Virtual Recruiting and SelectionLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/no-obstacles-opportunities-strategies-virtual/docview/2453783523/se-2?accountid=32521).
    – Review the article [Hiring Independent Contractors, Outsourcing Work, and Hiring Consultants: Here’s what you need to know about these unique business relationshipsLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=ccm&AN=173369784&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897).
    You will develop a recruiting and a selection strategy for Amazon to include both managerial and staff positions. You will want to think through the following three sequential stages of recruiting found in Chapter 11 of the course textbook:
    – Sourcing: process of generating a pool of applicants.
    – Assessing: evaluation of knowledge, skills, and abilities, and other characteristics necessary to perform a job.
    – Employing: process of moving the desired candidate into employment.
    First, consider and discuss the importance of Amazon having a positive organizational image and brand, and the impact on recruitment. Take into consideration the importance of recruiting for diversity. Next, you will need to develop a selection process, starting with the application, recommendations, employment testing, experience, drug screening, computer-based screening, and interviewing. Be sure to consider both managerial and staffing positions for both the recruiting and selection strategies.
    In your paper,
    – Analyze Amazon’s company profile and business model.
    – Construct a recruiting strategy using the three sequential stages.
    – Discuss the benefits of diversity in recruiting, the Amazon brand, contemporary human capital topics, and predictive analysis.
    – Create a selection strategy for both managerial and staff positions.
    4 pages
    3 sources including  Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2019). _Applied Psychology in Talent Management_ (8th ed.). Sage Publications.

  • [Solved] Everything

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Everything.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week 4 discussion 1 and Discussion 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Week 4 discussion 1 **How is conflict management critical to Project Management?** **What can happen during a period of conflict within a team?** **How does this differ from a conflict with a customer, or a supplier?** **What are some techniques to manage conflict?** **Have you ever tried any of the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Week 4 discussion 1
    **How is conflict management critical to Project Management?**
    **What can happen during a period of conflict within a team?**
    **How does this differ from a conflict with a customer, or a supplier?**
    **What are some techniques to manage conflict?**
    **Have you ever tried any of these? What was the result?**
    Week 4 discussion 2
    **Often, project work is outsourced. Explain principles of managing procurement in projects and challenges a project manager faces when all or part of the work is accomplished through outsourcing. What would you do to ensure quality work is delivered?**
    **Week 4 discussion 1 and Discussion 2 (4 replies per post)**
    NOT RATED
    Purchase the answer to view it
    ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png)
    ![homework question](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/loader.e99f1ef323fecd089c1cdcaaadcd1f9b.gif)
    plagiarism checkPurchase $15
    01. [Applied Sciences](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/applied-sciences)
    02. [Architecture and Design](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/architecture-and-design)
    03. [Biology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology)
    04. [Business & Finance](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance)
    05. [Chemistry](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/chemistry)
    06. [Computer Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science)
    07. [Geography](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/earth-science-geography)
    08. [Geology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/earth-science-geology)
    09. [Education](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/education)
    10. [Engineering](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/engineering)
    11. [English](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/english)
    12. [Environmental science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/environmental-science)
    13. [Spanish](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/foreign-languages-spanish)
    14. [Government](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/government)
    15. [History](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history)
    16. [Human Resource Management](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/human-resource-management)
    17. [Information Systems](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/information-systems)
    18. [Law](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law)
    19. [Literature](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/literature)
    20. [Mathematics](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics)
    21. [Nursing](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/nursing)
    22. [Physics](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/physics)
    23. [Political Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/political-science)
    24. [Psychology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/psychology)
    25. [Reading](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/reading)
    26. [Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/science)
    27. [Social Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science)
    28. [Liberty University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/liberty-university)
    29. [New Hampshire University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/southern-new-hampshire-university)
    30. [Strayer University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/strayer-university)
    31. [University Of Phoenix](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/university-of-phoenix)
    32. [Walden University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/walden-university)
    – [Home](https://www.sweetstudy.com/)
    – [Homework Answers](https://www.sweetstudy.com/homework-answers)
    – [Archive](https://www.sweetstudy.com/archive)
    – [Tags](https://www.sweetstudy.com/tag-cloud)
    – [Reviews](https://www.sweetstudy.com/reviews-page)
    – [Contact](https://www.sweetstudy.com/contact-us)