My Blog

Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] Create a discussion: follow the isntructions NO AI use no Plagiarism, REferences no older than 5 years old

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Compare the similarities and differences between the statistical component of a Quantitative and Qualitative Research report **Participation Requirements** The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instru…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Compare the similarities and differences between the statistical component of a Quantitative and Qualitative Research report
    **Participation Requirements**
    The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of each week. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.
    Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points.
    Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:
    **Initial Post** relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)
    **Quality of Written Communication** Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)
    **Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.**(10%)
    **Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references.** (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)
    **Peer & Professor Responses.** The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)
    **Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)**

  • [Solved] create a discussion. follow the instructions bellow:

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Management theories were developed and used to increase productivity and service quality. No one managers use a singular theory. They use a combination of several theories, depending on the organization: contingency theory, chaos theory, and systems theory. Discuss the difference between managers an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Management theories were developed and used to increase productivity and service quality. No one managers use a singular theory. They use a combination of several theories, depending on the organization: contingency theory, chaos theory, and systems theory.
    Discuss the difference between managers and leaders.  Include in your discussion the different types of leadership styles and management theories? What is the difference between authority and power? Have you experienced working for leaders that have authority but no power, or power but no authority?
    I look forward to exchanging with you and share my personal experience throughout the week!
    -Dr. Dionne 🙂
    =============================================
    ### **Participation Requirements**
    The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of each week. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What is the impact of using teach back to educate Latino men on the importance of lifestyle changes, exercise and medication adherence to blood pressure medication?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What is the impact of using teach back to educate Latino men on the importance of lifestyle changes, exercise and medication adherence to blood pressure medication?

  • [Solved] CONTROVERSY ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONALITY AND PARAPHILIC DISORDERS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the _DSM-5-TR_ to use for this Assignment. – Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the _DSM-5-TR_ to use for this Assignment.
    – Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations.
    In 2–3 pages:
    – Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.
    – Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
    – Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.
    – Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

  • [Solved] Medication Study Guide

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent

  • [Solved] module 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    my pico question: In adults diagnosed with schizotypal personality disorder, how does cognitive behavioral therapy compared to pharmacological treatment with Risperidone affect overall social functioning? Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    my pico question: In adults diagnosed with schizotypal personality disorder, how does cognitive behavioral therapy compared to pharmacological treatment with Risperidone affect overall social functioning?
    Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.
    \
    Screenshot2025-07-12at00.16.55.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-12at00-16-55-png "Screenshot2025-07-12at00.16.55.png")
    \
    Screenshot2025-07-12at00.17.40.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-12at00-17-40-png "Screenshot2025-07-12at00.17.40.png")

  • [Solved] self reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Objective of assignment**: _**How bias may affect PMHNP prescribing practices**_ **(Bias:** Prejudice toward or against one thing, idea, person or group compared to another; Usually in a way this is unfair. Biases are natural and product of human nature, and they don't simply exist in a vacuum or …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Objective of assignment**: _**How bias may affect PMHNP prescribing practices**_
    **(Bias:**  Prejudice toward or against one thing, idea, person or group compared to another; Usually in a way this is unfair.  Biases are natural and product of human nature, and they don't simply exist in a vacuum or in our mind's—they affect the way we make decisions and act.)
    **1:** **Discuss 2 of the following bias factors** that _may influence your prescribing practices_ **.** **Discuss whether the biases were directly experienced by yourself or whether you believe you have any of the following biases.** How has the video influenced your biases for your future PMHNP practice? Discuss how your biases have changed since watching the documentary video.
    1. _Cultural factors_ (For example:  Working with someone with limited English, someone who is not an American citizen, has extended family members in household, someone who has difficulty with holding jobs, assuming certain individuals will have legal or drug problems, assuming individuals will have similarities to other traditional American families, assuming individuals will have specific religious backgrounds or will be terrorists…..etc)
    2. _Legal factors_ (Someone who has a history of prison or jail time, history of past legal charges, Parents pending legal charges, someone on parole/probation, someone who has a history of felonies)
    3. _Ethical factors_ (Judging someone by the way one looks at life, situations, problems, or a position on something, or what one believes is right.  "I believe everyone should be able to quit drinking on their own."  )
    4. _Social factors_ ( For example: someone's living conditions, housing (being homeless), basic environment (living in a shelter), social security (disability), food stamps, low education, no family support)
    5. _Substance use_ (For example: chronic alcohol use, Suboxone or Methadone treatment, Methamphetamine abuse, Opiate or heroin abuse)
    6. _Economic factors_ (For example: Unemployment; low income, no health insurance, Medicaid or medicare)
    7. _Weight_ factors (For example: Stigmatization, discrimination against overweight and obese individuals, cultural practices)
    8. _Gender_ factors (For example: inadequate treatment, disparities in treatment, decreased quality of care, symptoms dismissed)
    2. _**Watch one or both of the following videos**_: _Flight from Darkness: A Bipolar Disorder Documentary (_ 60 minutes) and _Healing Neen_(54 minutes).
    3. After reviewing the video(s), _**Discuss how the video(s) has influenced or changed any bias you have about prescribing as a PMHNP moving forward.**_
    4. Please add your reflection to the drop box in canvas (see course calendar for due dates).  "Turn it in" software will be used to monitor for plagiarism or copying of outside resources. (Including AI).   Limit to 3 pages or less.  Use APA

  • [Solved] Shades of abnormality

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #### Objective: 1. To start critically thinking about levels of mental illness and appropriate follow-up response. #### Purpose: 1. Consider and critically think about how severe is a person's mental illness 2. Critically think about when a person needs psychotherapy or hospitalization? 3. This exer…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #### Objective:
    1. To start critically thinking about levels of mental illness and appropriate follow-up response.
    #### Purpose:
    1. Consider and critically think about how severe is a person's mental illness
    2. Critically think about when a person needs psychotherapy or hospitalization?
    3. This exercise encourages you to think critically about the above questions which you will be faced with daily as a PMHNP.
    #### Instructions:
    – Review the four cases presented.
    – Critically think about the case and rate each one using the rating scale:
    – 1 = Basically O.K. Psychotherapy is not needed.
    2 = Mild disturbance. Psychotherapy should be considered.
    3 = Significant disturbance. Psychotherapy is strongly recommended.
    4 = Severe disturbance. Hospitalize!
    – **Provide a rationale for each of your ratings for each case**.
    – Readings and citations are not required. Complete this assignment based on your current level of understanding.
    – Your completed assignment should total 1 – 3 pages in length. (Copying & pasting the case does not count as part of your 1 page minimum.)
    – Cases:
    – Bob is a very intelligent, 25 year old member of a religious organization that is based on Buddhism. Bob's working for this organization caused considerable conflict between him and his parents, who are devout Catholics. Recently Bob experiences acute spells of nausea and fatigue that prevent him from working and which have forced him to return home to live with his parents. Various medical tests are being conducted, but as yet no physical causes of his problems have been found.
    – Jim was vice president of the freshman class at a local college and played on the school's football team. Later that year he dropped out of these activities and gradually became more and more withdrawn from friends and family. Neglecting to shave and shower, he began to look dirty and unhealthy. He spent most of his time alone in his room and sometimes complained to his parents that he heard voices in the curtains and in the closet. In his sophomore year he dropped out of school entirely. With increasing anxiety and agitation, he began to worry that "people" were plotting to kill his family and kidnap him.
    – Mary is a 30 year old musician who is very dedicated and successful in her work as a teacher in a local high school and as a part-time member of local musical groups. Since her marriage five years ago, which ended in divorce after six months, she has dated very few men. She often worries that her time is "running out" for establishing a good relationship with a man, getting married, and raising a family. Her friends tell her that she gets way too anxious around men, and that she needs to relax a little in general.
    – Larry, a gay man who has lived for three years with a man he met in graduate school, works as a psychologist in a large hospital. Although competent in his work, he often feels strained by the pressures of his demanding position. An added source of tension on the job is his not being able to confide in all his co-workers about his private life. Most of his leisure activities are with good friends who belong to the gay community.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module7.docx **## Module7.docx** **Module 7:** _Literature Review_ Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module7.docx

    **## Module7.docx**

    **Module 7:** _Literature Review_

    Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your post should be at least four pages ( excluding title page and references page), with support of no less than eight academic sources, peer reviewed, formatted, and cited in the current APA style.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    **## Module7.docx**

    **Module 7:** _Literature Review_

    Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your post should be at least four pages ( excluding title page and references page), with support of no less than eight academic sources, peer reviewed, formatted, and cited in the current APA style.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing ASSIGNMENT.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.