Assignment Prompt & Instructions
see the attachments
– ## Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx
– ## W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx
– 4example_literature_.pdf
**## Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx**
NR631 Nurse Educator Continuing
Graduate Experience
**Research Summary Table Template**
For Week 4 Review of Literature Assignment
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Author (Date) | Design | Sample/<br>Setting | Findings | Measures (Outcomes) | Limitations/Evidence Level |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
NR631 W4 Research Summary Table Template
**## W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx**
**Week 4 Assignment: Review of the Literature**
**Guideline and Rubric**
## Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in developing a research summary table and synthesis of the literature for the executive CGE project.
## Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, you will address the following course learning outcomes:
CO 1: Apply evidence-based leadership skills and concepts in the planning of an executive-level practice change project. (PO 4, 5)
CO 2: Develop an evidence-based foundation to lead organizational change using current knowledge, standards of practice, and research from current literature. (PO 4, 5)
**Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4**
## Total Points Possible: 100 Points
**MY PICOT QUESTION:**
**In adult patients on a med-surg unit (P), how does implementing purposeful hourly rounding by nursing staff (I), compared to no structured rounding (C), affect the incidence of patient falls (O) over 16 weeks (T)?**
**Project title;**
**Purposeful rounding to reduce patient falls?**
## Assignment Overview
Begin your review of the literature by constructing a research summary table. You will use the research summary table to synthesize the literature on your intervention into the Review of the Literature paper.
## Assignment Instructions
The following information should be included in this section of your proposal.
1. Research Summary Table
Collect a minimum of 10 current scholarly research studies related to your proposed executive CGE project intervention.
**Use the Research Summary Table Template to develop your table**. For each article/study that will be used in your paper, fill in the table in your own words.
2. Review of the Literature Paper
Examining your table column by column, identify major themes in your articles.
Use your major themes to organize your Review of the Literature under subheadings. You are likely to have two to five themes or subheadings.
Briefly summarize the major themes from your synthesis of the literature to end your review of the literature.
The paper should be 3-5 pages long, not including the title page, reference list, and Research Summary Table. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement.
Attach your Research Summary Table as an appendix at the end of the literature review, after the reference list, and label it “Appendix A, Research Summary Table.” Only one document should be submitted. Do not submit the paper and table separately.
## Assignment Criteria
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Research Summary Table | 20 | 20% | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 | 20% | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 | 10% | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 | 20% | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme |
| Summary of Findings | 20 | 20% | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 | 5% | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 | 5% | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| Total | 100 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
NR 631: Nurse Executive Concluding Graduate Experience I
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
## Grading Rubric
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished<br>(100%) | Exceeds<br>(92%) | Proficient<br>(84%) | Needs Improvement<br>(0%) |
| Research Summary Table | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least nine evidence-based articles on the intervention; one article is included on the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least eight evidence-based articles on the intervention; two articles are included on the executive problem or issue | Does not develop a Research Summary Table or includes less than eight evidence-based articles. |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 9 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 8 of articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes fewer than 8 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but a few of the themes are not described clearly | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but misses one or more important themes or summarizes articles without tying their results to a theme | Review of literature is a list of summaries of articles and does not reflect synthesis of the literature |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but some areas are unclear | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but half of the synthesis is unclear | Does not describe what was found in the literature about each theme but instead focuses on an article-by-article summary |
| Summary of Findings | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear and the summary is not related to the coming intervention and evaluation paper | Does not summarize what was found in the review of the literature |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are not used; assignment contains seven or more errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper APA format is used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper APA format is used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Assignment contains seven or more errors in APA format. |
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
**4example_literature_.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/4example-literature-pdf)
**4example_literature_.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/4example-literature-pdf)
**## Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx**
NR631 Nurse Educator Continuing
Graduate Experience
**Research Summary Table Template**
For Week 4 Review of Literature Assignment
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Author (Date) | Design | Sample/<br>Setting | Findings | Measures (Outcomes) | Limitations/Evidence Level |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
NR631 W4 Research Summary Table Template
**## W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx**
**Week 4 Assignment: Review of the Literature**
**Guideline and Rubric**
## Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in developing a research summary table and synthesis of the literature for the executive CGE project.
## Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, you will address the following course learning outcomes:
CO 1: Apply evidence-based leadership skills and concepts in the planning of an executive-level practice change project. (PO 4, 5)
CO 2: Develop an evidence-based foundation to lead organizational change using current knowledge, standards of practice, and research from current literature. (PO 4, 5)
**Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4**
## Total Points Possible: 100 Points
**MY PICOT QUESTION:**
**In adult patients on a med-surg unit (P), how does implementing purposeful hourly rounding by nursing staff (I), compared to no structured rounding (C), affect the incidence of patient falls (O) over 16 weeks (T)?**
**Project title;**
**Purposeful rounding to reduce patient falls?**
## Assignment Overview
Begin your review of the literature by constructing a research summary table. You will use the research summary table to synthesize the literature on your intervention into the Review of the Literature paper.
## Assignment Instructions
The following information should be included in this section of your proposal.
1. Research Summary Table
Collect a minimum of 10 current scholarly research studies related to your proposed executive CGE project intervention.
**Use the Research Summary Table Template to develop your table**. For each article/study that will be used in your paper, fill in the table in your own words.
2. Review of the Literature Paper
Examining your table column by column, identify major themes in your articles.
Use your major themes to organize your Review of the Literature under subheadings. You are likely to have two to five themes or subheadings.
Briefly summarize the major themes from your synthesis of the literature to end your review of the literature.
The paper should be 3-5 pages long, not including the title page, reference list, and Research Summary Table. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement.
Attach your Research Summary Table as an appendix at the end of the literature review, after the reference list, and label it “Appendix A, Research Summary Table.” Only one document should be submitted. Do not submit the paper and table separately.
## Assignment Criteria
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Research Summary Table | 20 | 20% | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 | 20% | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 | 10% | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 | 20% | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme |
| Summary of Findings | 20 | 20% | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 | 5% | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 | 5% | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| Total | 100 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
NR 631: Nurse Executive Concluding Graduate Experience I
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
## Grading Rubric
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished<br>(100%) | Exceeds<br>(92%) | Proficient<br>(84%) | Needs Improvement<br>(0%) |
| Research Summary Table | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least nine evidence-based articles on the intervention; one article is included on the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least eight evidence-based articles on the intervention; two articles are included on the executive problem or issue | Does not develop a Research Summary Table or includes less than eight evidence-based articles. |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 9 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 8 of articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes fewer than 8 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but a few of the themes are not described clearly | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but misses one or more important themes or summarizes articles without tying their results to a theme | Review of literature is a list of summaries of articles and does not reflect synthesis of the literature |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but some areas are unclear | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but half of the synthesis is unclear | Does not describe what was found in the literature about each theme but instead focuses on an article-by-article summary |
| Summary of Findings | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear and the summary is not related to the coming intervention and evaluation paper | Does not summarize what was found in the review of the literature |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are not used; assignment contains seven or more errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper APA format is used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper APA format is used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Assignment contains seven or more errors in APA format. |
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
**4example_literature_.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/4example-literature-pdf)
**## Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx**
NR631 Nurse Educator Continuing
Graduate Experience
**Research Summary Table Template**
For Week 4 Review of Literature Assignment
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Author (Date) | Design | Sample/<br>Setting | Findings | Measures (Outcomes) | Limitations/Evidence Level |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
NR631 W4 Research Summary Table Template
**## W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx**
**Week 4 Assignment: Review of the Literature**
**Guideline and Rubric**
## Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in developing a research summary table and synthesis of the literature for the executive CGE project.
## Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, you will address the following course learning outcomes:
CO 1: Apply evidence-based leadership skills and concepts in the planning of an executive-level practice change project. (PO 4, 5)
CO 2: Develop an evidence-based foundation to lead organizational change using current knowledge, standards of practice, and research from current literature. (PO 4, 5)
**Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4**
## Total Points Possible: 100 Points
**MY PICOT QUESTION:**
**In adult patients on a med-surg unit (P), how does implementing purposeful hourly rounding by nursing staff (I), compared to no structured rounding (C), affect the incidence of patient falls (O) over 16 weeks (T)?**
**Project title;**
**Purposeful rounding to reduce patient falls?**
## Assignment Overview
Begin your review of the literature by constructing a research summary table. You will use the research summary table to synthesize the literature on your intervention into the Review of the Literature paper.
## Assignment Instructions
The following information should be included in this section of your proposal.
1. Research Summary Table
Collect a minimum of 10 current scholarly research studies related to your proposed executive CGE project intervention.
**Use the Research Summary Table Template to develop your table**. For each article/study that will be used in your paper, fill in the table in your own words.
2. Review of the Literature Paper
Examining your table column by column, identify major themes in your articles.
Use your major themes to organize your Review of the Literature under subheadings. You are likely to have two to five themes or subheadings.
Briefly summarize the major themes from your synthesis of the literature to end your review of the literature.
The paper should be 3-5 pages long, not including the title page, reference list, and Research Summary Table. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement.
Attach your Research Summary Table as an appendix at the end of the literature review, after the reference list, and label it “Appendix A, Research Summary Table.” Only one document should be submitted. Do not submit the paper and table separately.
## Assignment Criteria
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Research Summary Table | 20 | 20% | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 | 20% | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 | 10% | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 | 20% | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme |
| Summary of Findings | 20 | 20% | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 | 5% | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 | 5% | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. |
| Total | 100 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
NR 631: Nurse Executive Concluding Graduate Experience I
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
## Grading Rubric
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished<br>(100%) | Exceeds<br>(92%) | Proficient<br>(84%) | Needs Improvement<br>(0%) |
| Research Summary Table | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least nine evidence-based articles on the intervention; one article is included on the executive problem or issue | Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least eight evidence-based articles on the intervention; two articles are included on the executive problem or issue | Does not develop a Research Summary Table or includes less than eight evidence-based articles. |
| Analysis of Articles | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 9 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes 8 of articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations | Analyzes fewer than 8 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations |
| Themes and Subheadings | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but a few of the themes are not described clearly | Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but misses one or more important themes or summarizes articles without tying their results to a theme | Review of literature is a list of summaries of articles and does not reflect synthesis of the literature |
| Description of Each Theme | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but some areas are unclear | Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but half of the synthesis is unclear | Does not describe what was found in the literature about each theme but instead focuses on an article-by-article summary |
| Summary of Findings | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear | Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear and the summary is not related to the coming intervention and evaluation paper | Does not summarize what was found in the review of the literature |
| Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are not used; assignment contains seven or more errors. |
| APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 0 Points |
| | Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors. | Proper APA format is used, with no more than three to four errors. | Proper APA format is used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors. | Assignment contains seven or more errors in APA format. |
NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23
**4example_literature_.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/4example-literature-pdf)
– 1
– 2
– 3