Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] w8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    will contact tutor – Portfolio.docx **Portfolio.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/portfolio-docx-10343091) **Portfolio.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/portfolio-docx-10343091…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    will contact tutor

    – Portfolio.docx

    **Portfolio.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/portfolio-docx-10343091)

    **Portfolio.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/portfolio-docx-10343091)

  • [Solved] Medication Study Guide

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    3 PG (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    3 PG  (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study.

  • [Solved] Week 1 discussion (class 1)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 1 discussion (class 1).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] DB wk 550

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## dbwk1550.docx – ## LizaAguirre-OviedoCapstoneFinalPresentation_May2022.pdf – Trust-BasedPhilanthropy-AQualitativeAnalysisofArizonasPhilanthropicSector-ErinOwenFinalCapstoneProjectMay2022-1.pdf – AbstractsofCompletedMSOGLCapstoneProjects_101021-1.pdf – Aguirre-Oviedo_CapstoneProjectProspectus…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## dbwk1550.docx

    – ## LizaAguirre-OviedoCapstoneFinalPresentation_May2022.pdf

    – Trust-BasedPhilanthropy-AQualitativeAnalysisofArizonasPhilanthropicSector-ErinOwenFinalCapstoneProjectMay2022-1.pdf
    – AbstractsofCompletedMSOGLCapstoneProjects_101021-1.pdf
    – Aguirre-Oviedo_CapstoneProjectProspectus_March2022-1.pdf
    – Literaturereviewasamethod.pdf
    – AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322.pdf
    – Tranfieldetal.2003.pdf
    – LiteratureReview.pdf
    – Systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch.pdf

    **## dbwk1550.docx**

    Module 1: Discussion Board on Applied Project Ideas

    Hello Leaders,

    Please complete this two-part assignment:

    · For part 1, after reviewing all of
    [the materials on the MODULE 1 ACTIVITY page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/assignments/6322450), submit an initial post of at least 300 words addressing the points below.

    · For part 2, respond to
    **ONE** of your classmates’ posts by answering the question(s) they posed in their initial post (Due 2 days after the "Due Date" for the initial post — with NO ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS (the "48-hour exception" does NOT apply here). The response post should be at least 150 words.

    **Initial post (Due FRIDAY)**

    Write a post of at least 300 words addressing the following four items.
    **Please use topical headings or numbers to make it easy for readers to see that you’ve covered all four items**:

    1.
    **Please introduce yourself to the class.** What is your background and where do you live now? By what name would you like us to address you? Do you have any hobbies? What are your career aspirations? Why are you getting a Masters degree?
    _(Don’t worry about this part, I will do it)_

    2.
    **Next, please share your current thinking on your applied project**.

    · What problem, industry, and/or phenomenon are you interested in for your applied project?  This class will help you continue planning what kind of questions and problems you are interested in, and how you might go about researching and developing solutions for them.

    · Who will benefit from your research, e.g., who is the end user? How will they benefit?
    [This website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) has examples of benefits from research impact. There are many other types of benefits/impact too, so don't limit yourself to just these.

    · What is your proposed deliverable?

    3.
    **From what you've learned so far from the readings and watching the videos, what organizational design/process issues might be related to the problem you want to study for your applied project**? Sources of problems often stem from failing at one of the five management functions (
    _planning, organizing, leading, coordinating, controlling)_. For example, is poor organization or lack of coordination interfering with productivity or collegial teamwork? How might this reflect a mechanistic approach? Or, is the company losing market share because it’s become too rigid and failed to keep up with changing customer expectations, similar to the Uno Pizza example?
    **Be sure to use vocabulary and ideas from the readings and videos in your analysis, citing appropriately, to demonstrate your mastery of these materials.** For example, contextualize the issue in terms of how it relates to a management function and how it reflects historic or emerging view of management science (e.g., mechanistic vs. organismic). Reflect on how you have framed the problem and what assumptions underlie that framing. If you're not clear about a concept in this unit, be sure to mention that, too, so we can discuss it. Please be sure to provide a references list at the end your discussion.

    4.
    **Conclude your post by posing a question to your classmates that asks for feedback on a specific aspect of your applied project summary and research approach**. Their comments will be helpful as you refine your project idea further. For example, are there other questions you should be asking to help solve this problem? Have you framed the problem in the right way? Are you taking on too big (or too small) of a problem? Remember, this project should be doable in about 6-7 weeks. Also think about how you you will be able to get data, if/how you can get access to the organization, and/or what questions you should ask and answer to solve the problem you are trying to address.

    **## LizaAguirre-OviedoCapstoneFinalPresentation_May2022.pdf**

    “Capacity Building During Times of Crisis – How

    Nonprofit Leaders in San Diego Execute Relational

    Capital Strategies to Strengthen Sustainability”

    Liza Aguirre-Oviedo

    Arizona State University
    MSOGL Capstone Colloquium Presentation

    ❑ Introduction – Capstone Decision Journey

    ❑ Project Summary – Solution
    ❑ Contents & Methods

    ❑ Scholarship – Framework

    ❑ The Project

    ❑ Lesson Types

    ❑ Broader Body of Knowledge
    ❑ Project Design & Layout

    ❑ Research Concluding Findings

    ❑ Research Expansion

    ❑ Model of Leadership

    Presentation Summary

    My Motto

    “Thrive in helping businesses and individuals

    maximize potentials.”

    Capstone Project – Synthesize Knowledge

    The Journey

    Capstone

    OGL 520

    Dr.
    Thomas

    OGL 574

    Dr.
    Chandler

    OGL 540

    Dr. Trihn

    OGL 562

    Dr.
    Castillo

    OGL 568

    Dr.
    Veech

    OGL 554

    Dr.
    Wallace

    OGL 553

    Dr.
    Hirshorn

    Capstone Project – Decision

    Journey

    “How could my capstone project help nonprofits and

    their leadership maximize potentials to strengthen

    sustainability during a time of crisis?”

    Sought to find answers embarking on two

    measures:

    SCHOLARSHIP

    RESEARCH

    Capstone Project – Scholarship

    Capstone Project – Research

    “What are the differences between the FOCUS and

    STRATEGIES of Citizen School’s capacity building

    in educational relational capital compared to their

    capacity building in corporation and foundation

    relational capital that are revealed in their press

    releases and preview reports?”

    Capstone Project – Additional

    Research

    The Problem

    How nonprofits operating in San Diego,
    California struggle with financial sustainability.

    Contributing Factors:
    1. Operating in Times of Crisis – Pandemic
    2. Size of the Nonprofit
    3. Limited Leadership Capacity Skills and or

    Resources

    One

    Solution

    Building Capacity in

    Relational Capital

    Capstone Project – Learning and
    Development Website

    Content

    &

    Methods

    MSOGL

    Learning Materials

    Qualitative Research

    Interviews

    Capstone Project – Areas of

    Knowledge

    Website Page – Communications

    Website Page – Resource Development

    Qualcomm CSR Report – Social Impact

    STEM Education

    Website Page – Organizational Culture

    Qualitative Data Research Interview

    Results

    Three factors impact an organization’s

    financial sustainability.

    1. Stakeholder Communications

    2. Strategic Planning

    3. Development

    BROADER BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

    Women in Leadership

    Equity & Inclusion

    Workplace Culture

    Empower Individuals

    Empower Teams

    We can provide the best resources and concepts to leaders to

    succeed, however if they are held back by a negative culture,

    negative communications, and limiting beliefs, those leaders will

    struggle in leading in any VUCA or non-VUCA environment.

    WEBSITE DESIGN & LAYOUT

    Conclusions drawn from the qualitative
    research indicate that organizational leaders
    of small nonprofits focus on communications
    and relationships, and struggle with a lack of

    sustainability planning. Contrary to large
    nonprofits place more focus on addressing
    relationships, economics (fundraising), and

    crisis strategies.

    Concluding Findings

    Question 2

    What stands out when you think

    of your organization building

    capacity in relational capital?

    Small
    “I think that the most important thing is
    engaging donors and prospective donors in the
    work of the organization.”

    Large
    “I think what stands out is that we highly price
    relational capital. If a billionaire wants to drop
    $200,000, we want to make sure that people
    feel that their contribution is valued.”

    Capstone Project

    Expansion

    Research further the WHY?

    Research further the background of nonprofit
    leaders and their organization’s governance.

    Professional Background

    Cultural Background

    Education Background

    Gender

    Capstone Project – MSOGL

    Reflection

    Leadership Motto

    A leader that develops and contributes to a healthy

    and balanced organizational culture, one that

    elevates respect, encourages collaboration,

    stimulates intelligence, and practices

    empowerment.

    Previous Model of Leadership

    80% Servant 20% Transformational

    New Model of Leadership
    25% Transformational 25% Servant 25% Authentic 25% Democratic

    50/50 Mix of Vertical and Shared Leadership

    Thank you!

    **Trust-BasedPhilanthropy-AQualitativeAnalysisofArizonasPhilanthropicSector-ErinOwenFinalCapstoneProjectMay2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/trust-basedphilanthropy-aqualitativeanalysisofarizonasphilanthropicsector-erinowenfinalcapstoneprojectmay2022-1-pdf)

    **AbstractsofCompletedMSOGLCapstoneProjects_101021-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/abstractsofcompletedmsoglcapstoneprojects-101021-1-pdf)

    **Aguirre-Oviedo_CapstoneProjectProspectus_March2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/aguirre-oviedo-capstoneprojectprospectus-march2022-1-pdf)

    **Literaturereviewasamethod.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereviewasamethod-pdf)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-pdf)

    **Tranfieldetal.2003.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/tranfieldetal-2003-pdf)

    **LiteratureReview.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereview-pdf-10343035)

    **Systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch-pdf)

    **Systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch-pdf)

    **## dbwk1550.docx**

    Module 1: Discussion Board on Applied Project Ideas

    Hello Leaders,

    Please complete this two-part assignment:

    · For part 1, after reviewing all of
    [the materials on the MODULE 1 ACTIVITY page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/assignments/6322450), submit an initial post of at least 300 words addressing the points below.

    · For part 2, respond to
    **ONE** of your classmates’ posts by answering the question(s) they posed in their initial post (Due 2 days after the "Due Date" for the initial post — with NO ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS (the "48-hour exception" does NOT apply here). The response post should be at least 150 words.

    **Initial post (Due FRIDAY)**

    Write a post of at least 300 words addressing the following four items.
    **Please use topical headings or numbers to make it easy for readers to see that you’ve covered all four items**:

    1.
    **Please introduce yourself to the class.** What is your background and where do you live now? By what name would you like us to address you? Do you have any hobbies? What are your career aspirations? Why are you getting a Masters degree?
    _(Don’t worry about this part, I will do it)_

    2.
    **Next, please share your current thinking on your applied project**.

    · What problem, industry, and/or phenomenon are you interested in for your applied project?  This class will help you continue planning what kind of questions and problems you are interested in, and how you might go about researching and developing solutions for them.

    · Who will benefit from your research, e.g., who is the end user? How will they benefit?
    [This website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) has examples of benefits from research impact. There are many other types of benefits/impact too, so don't limit yourself to just these.

    · What is your proposed deliverable?

    3.
    **From what you've learned so far from the readings and watching the videos, what organizational design/process issues might be related to the problem you want to study for your applied project**? Sources of problems often stem from failing at one of the five management functions (
    _planning, organizing, leading, coordinating, controlling)_. For example, is poor organization or lack of coordination interfering with productivity or collegial teamwork? How might this reflect a mechanistic approach? Or, is the company losing market share because it’s become too rigid and failed to keep up with changing customer expectations, similar to the Uno Pizza example?
    **Be sure to use vocabulary and ideas from the readings and videos in your analysis, citing appropriately, to demonstrate your mastery of these materials.** For example, contextualize the issue in terms of how it relates to a management function and how it reflects historic or emerging view of management science (e.g., mechanistic vs. organismic). Reflect on how you have framed the problem and what assumptions underlie that framing. If you're not clear about a concept in this unit, be sure to mention that, too, so we can discuss it. Please be sure to provide a references list at the end your discussion.

    4.
    **Conclude your post by posing a question to your classmates that asks for feedback on a specific aspect of your applied project summary and research approach**. Their comments will be helpful as you refine your project idea further. For example, are there other questions you should be asking to help solve this problem? Have you framed the problem in the right way? Are you taking on too big (or too small) of a problem? Remember, this project should be doable in about 6-7 weeks. Also think about how you you will be able to get data, if/how you can get access to the organization, and/or what questions you should ask and answer to solve the problem you are trying to address.

    **## LizaAguirre-OviedoCapstoneFinalPresentation_May2022.pdf**

    “Capacity Building During Times of Crisis – How

    Nonprofit Leaders in San Diego Execute Relational

    Capital Strategies to Strengthen Sustainability”

    Liza Aguirre-Oviedo

    Arizona State University
    MSOGL Capstone Colloquium Presentation

    ❑ Introduction – Capstone Decision Journey

    ❑ Project Summary – Solution
    ❑ Contents & Methods

    ❑ Scholarship – Framework

    ❑ The Project

    ❑ Lesson Types

    ❑ Broader Body of Knowledge
    ❑ Project Design & Layout

    ❑ Research Concluding Findings

    ❑ Research Expansion

    ❑ Model of Leadership

    Presentation Summary

    My Motto

    “Thrive in helping businesses and individuals

    maximize potentials.”

    Capstone Project – Synthesize Knowledge

    The Journey

    Capstone

    OGL 520

    Dr.
    Thomas

    OGL 574

    Dr.
    Chandler

    OGL 540

    Dr. Trihn

    OGL 562

    Dr.
    Castillo

    OGL 568

    Dr.
    Veech

    OGL 554

    Dr.
    Wallace

    OGL 553

    Dr.
    Hirshorn

    Capstone Project – Decision

    Journey

    “How could my capstone project help nonprofits and

    their leadership maximize potentials to strengthen

    sustainability during a time of crisis?”

    Sought to find answers embarking on two

    measures:

    SCHOLARSHIP

    RESEARCH

    Capstone Project – Scholarship

    Capstone Project – Research

    “What are the differences between the FOCUS and

    STRATEGIES of Citizen School’s capacity building

    in educational relational capital compared to their

    capacity building in corporation and foundation

    relational capital that are revealed in their press

    releases and preview reports?”

    Capstone Project – Additional

    Research

    The Problem

    How nonprofits operating in San Diego,
    California struggle with financial sustainability.

    Contributing Factors:
    1. Operating in Times of Crisis – Pandemic
    2. Size of the Nonprofit
    3. Limited Leadership Capacity Skills and or

    Resources

    One

    Solution

    Building Capacity in

    Relational Capital

    Capstone Project – Learning and
    Development Website

    Content

    &

    Methods

    MSOGL

    Learning Materials

    Qualitative Research

    Interviews

    Capstone Project – Areas of

    Knowledge

    Website Page – Communications

    Website Page – Resource Development

    Qualcomm CSR Report – Social Impact

    STEM Education

    Website Page – Organizational Culture

    Qualitative Data Research Interview

    Results

    Three factors impact an organization’s

    financial sustainability.

    1. Stakeholder Communications

    2. Strategic Planning

    3. Development

    BROADER BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

    Women in Leadership

    Equity & Inclusion

    Workplace Culture

    Empower Individuals

    Empower Teams

    We can provide the best resources and concepts to leaders to

    succeed, however if they are held back by a negative culture,

    negative communications, and limiting beliefs, those leaders will

    struggle in leading in any VUCA or non-VUCA environment.

    WEBSITE DESIGN & LAYOUT

    Conclusions drawn from the qualitative
    research indicate that organizational leaders
    of small nonprofits focus on communications
    and relationships, and struggle with a lack of

    sustainability planning. Contrary to large
    nonprofits place more focus on addressing
    relationships, economics (fundraising), and

    crisis strategies.

    Concluding Findings

    Question 2

    What stands out when you think

    of your organization building

    capacity in relational capital?

    Small
    “I think that the most important thing is
    engaging donors and prospective donors in the
    work of the organization.”

    Large
    “I think what stands out is that we highly price
    relational capital. If a billionaire wants to drop
    $200,000, we want to make sure that people
    feel that their contribution is valued.”

    Capstone Project

    Expansion

    Research further the WHY?

    Research further the background of nonprofit
    leaders and their organization’s governance.

    Professional Background

    Cultural Background

    Education Background

    Gender

    Capstone Project – MSOGL

    Reflection

    Leadership Motto

    A leader that develops and contributes to a healthy

    and balanced organizational culture, one that

    elevates respect, encourages collaboration,

    stimulates intelligence, and practices

    empowerment.

    Previous Model of Leadership

    80% Servant 20% Transformational

    New Model of Leadership
    25% Transformational 25% Servant 25% Authentic 25% Democratic

    50/50 Mix of Vertical and Shared Leadership

    Thank you!

    **Trust-BasedPhilanthropy-AQualitativeAnalysisofArizonasPhilanthropicSector-ErinOwenFinalCapstoneProjectMay2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/trust-basedphilanthropy-aqualitativeanalysisofarizonasphilanthropicsector-erinowenfinalcapstoneprojectmay2022-1-pdf)

    **AbstractsofCompletedMSOGLCapstoneProjects_101021-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/abstractsofcompletedmsoglcapstoneprojects-101021-1-pdf)

    **Aguirre-Oviedo_CapstoneProjectProspectus_March2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/aguirre-oviedo-capstoneprojectprospectus-march2022-1-pdf)

    **Literaturereviewasamethod.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereviewasamethod-pdf)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-pdf)

    **Tranfieldetal.2003.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/tranfieldetal-2003-pdf)

    **LiteratureReview.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereview-pdf-10343035)

    **Systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch-pdf)

    **## dbwk1550.docx**

    Module 1: Discussion Board on Applied Project Ideas

    Hello Leaders,

    Please complete this two-part assignment:

    · For part 1, after reviewing all of
    [the materials on the MODULE 1 ACTIVITY page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/assignments/6322450), submit an initial post of at least 300 words addressing the points below.

    · For part 2, respond to
    **ONE** of your classmates’ posts by answering the question(s) they posed in their initial post (Due 2 days after the "Due Date" for the initial post — with NO ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS (the "48-hour exception" does NOT apply here). The response post should be at least 150 words.

    **Initial post (Due FRIDAY)**

    Write a post of at least 300 words addressing the following four items.
    **Please use topical headings or numbers to make it easy for readers to see that you’ve covered all four items**:

    1.
    **Please introduce yourself to the class.** What is your background and where do you live now? By what name would you like us to address you? Do you have any hobbies? What are your career aspirations? Why are you getting a Masters degree?
    _(Don’t worry about this part, I will do it)_

    2.
    **Next, please share your current thinking on your applied project**.

    · What problem, industry, and/or phenomenon are you interested in for your applied project?  This class will help you continue planning what kind of questions and problems you are interested in, and how you might go about researching and developing solutions for them.

    · Who will benefit from your research, e.g., who is the end user? How will they benefit?
    [This website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) has examples of benefits from research impact. There are many other types of benefits/impact too, so don't limit yourself to just these.

    · What is your proposed deliverable?

    3.
    **From what you've learned so far from the readings and watching the videos, what organizational design/process issues might be related to the problem you want to study for your applied project**? Sources of problems often stem from failing at one of the five management functions (
    _planning, organizing, leading, coordinating, controlling)_. For example, is poor organization or lack of coordination interfering with productivity or collegial teamwork? How might this reflect a mechanistic approach? Or, is the company losing market share because it’s become too rigid and failed to keep up with changing customer expectations, similar to the Uno Pizza example?
    **Be sure to use vocabulary and ideas from the readings and videos in your analysis, citing appropriately, to demonstrate your mastery of these materials.** For example, contextualize the issue in terms of how it relates to a management function and how it reflects historic or emerging view of management science (e.g., mechanistic vs. organismic). Reflect on how you have framed the problem and what assumptions underlie that framing. If you're not clear about a concept in this unit, be sure to mention that, too, so we can discuss it. Please be sure to provide a references list at the end your discussion.

    4.
    **Conclude your post by posing a question to your classmates that asks for feedback on a specific aspect of your applied project summary and research approach**. Their comments will be helpful as you refine your project idea further. For example, are there other questions you should be asking to help solve this problem? Have you framed the problem in the right way? Are you taking on too big (or too small) of a problem? Remember, this project should be doable in about 6-7 weeks. Also think about how you you will be able to get data, if/how you can get access to the organization, and/or what questions you should ask and answer to solve the problem you are trying to address.

    **## LizaAguirre-OviedoCapstoneFinalPresentation_May2022.pdf**

    “Capacity Building During Times of Crisis – How

    Nonprofit Leaders in San Diego Execute Relational

    Capital Strategies to Strengthen Sustainability”

    Liza Aguirre-Oviedo

    Arizona State University
    MSOGL Capstone Colloquium Presentation

    ❑ Introduction – Capstone Decision Journey

    ❑ Project Summary – Solution
    ❑ Contents & Methods

    ❑ Scholarship – Framework

    ❑ The Project

    ❑ Lesson Types

    ❑ Broader Body of Knowledge
    ❑ Project Design & Layout

    ❑ Research Concluding Findings

    ❑ Research Expansion

    ❑ Model of Leadership

    Presentation Summary

    My Motto

    “Thrive in helping businesses and individuals

    maximize potentials.”

    Capstone Project – Synthesize Knowledge

    The Journey

    Capstone

    OGL 520

    Dr.
    Thomas

    OGL 574

    Dr.
    Chandler

    OGL 540

    Dr. Trihn

    OGL 562

    Dr.
    Castillo

    OGL 568

    Dr.
    Veech

    OGL 554

    Dr.
    Wallace

    OGL 553

    Dr.
    Hirshorn

    Capstone Project – Decision

    Journey

    “How could my capstone project help nonprofits and

    their leadership maximize potentials to strengthen

    sustainability during a time of crisis?”

    Sought to find answers embarking on two

    measures:

    SCHOLARSHIP

    RESEARCH

    Capstone Project – Scholarship

    Capstone Project – Research

    “What are the differences between the FOCUS and

    STRATEGIES of Citizen School’s capacity building

    in educational relational capital compared to their

    capacity building in corporation and foundation

    relational capital that are revealed in their press

    releases and preview reports?”

    Capstone Project – Additional

    Research

    The Problem

    How nonprofits operating in San Diego,
    California struggle with financial sustainability.

    Contributing Factors:
    1. Operating in Times of Crisis – Pandemic
    2. Size of the Nonprofit
    3. Limited Leadership Capacity Skills and or

    Resources

    One

    Solution

    Building Capacity in

    Relational Capital

    Capstone Project – Learning and
    Development Website

    Content

    &

    Methods

    MSOGL

    Learning Materials

    Qualitative Research

    Interviews

    Capstone Project – Areas of

    Knowledge

    Website Page – Communications

    Website Page – Resource Development

    Qualcomm CSR Report – Social Impact

    STEM Education

    Website Page – Organizational Culture

    Qualitative Data Research Interview

    Results

    Three factors impact an organization’s

    financial sustainability.

    1. Stakeholder Communications

    2. Strategic Planning

    3. Development

    BROADER BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

    Women in Leadership

    Equity & Inclusion

    Workplace Culture

    Empower Individuals

    Empower Teams

    We can provide the best resources and concepts to leaders to

    succeed, however if they are held back by a negative culture,

    negative communications, and limiting beliefs, those leaders will

    struggle in leading in any VUCA or non-VUCA environment.

    WEBSITE DESIGN & LAYOUT

    Conclusions drawn from the qualitative
    research indicate that organizational leaders
    of small nonprofits focus on communications
    and relationships, and struggle with a lack of

    sustainability planning. Contrary to large
    nonprofits place more focus on addressing
    relationships, economics (fundraising), and

    crisis strategies.

    Concluding Findings

    Question 2

    What stands out when you think

    of your organization building

    capacity in relational capital?

    Small
    “I think that the most important thing is
    engaging donors and prospective donors in the
    work of the organization.”

    Large
    “I think what stands out is that we highly price
    relational capital. If a billionaire wants to drop
    $200,000, we want to make sure that people
    feel that their contribution is valued.”

    Capstone Project

    Expansion

    Research further the WHY?

    Research further the background of nonprofit
    leaders and their organization’s governance.

    Professional Background

    Cultural Background

    Education Background

    Gender

    Capstone Project – MSOGL

    Reflection

    Leadership Motto

    A leader that develops and contributes to a healthy

    and balanced organizational culture, one that

    elevates respect, encourages collaboration,

    stimulates intelligence, and practices

    empowerment.

    Previous Model of Leadership

    80% Servant 20% Transformational

    New Model of Leadership
    25% Transformational 25% Servant 25% Authentic 25% Democratic

    50/50 Mix of Vertical and Shared Leadership

    Thank you!

    **Trust-BasedPhilanthropy-AQualitativeAnalysisofArizonasPhilanthropicSector-ErinOwenFinalCapstoneProjectMay2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/trust-basedphilanthropy-aqualitativeanalysisofarizonasphilanthropicsector-erinowenfinalcapstoneprojectmay2022-1-pdf)

    **AbstractsofCompletedMSOGLCapstoneProjects_101021-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/abstractsofcompletedmsoglcapstoneprojects-101021-1-pdf)

    **Aguirre-Oviedo_CapstoneProjectProspectus_March2022-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/aguirre-oviedo-capstoneprojectprospectus-march2022-1-pdf)

    **Literaturereviewasamethod.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereviewasamethod-pdf)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-pdf)

    **Tranfieldetal.2003.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/tranfieldetal-2003-pdf)

    **LiteratureReview.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/literaturereview-pdf-10343035)

    **Systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/systemsthinkinginsustainabilitymanagementresearch-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7
    – 8
    – 9
    – 10

  • [Solved] Week 4 discussion (class 1)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 4 discussion (class 1).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Midterm Reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    my overall grade in class is a 88.8 – ## SA4MidtermReflection.html.zip **## SA4MidtermReflection.html.zip** ## SA 4 Midterm Reflection.html ## Overview ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/midterm-reflection-20926553) ##### Fixed vs Growth Mindset from Accredited Online Training ### Purpose Refl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    my overall grade in class is a 88.8

    – ## SA4MidtermReflection.html.zip

    **## SA4MidtermReflection.html.zip**

    ## SA 4 Midterm Reflection.html

    ## Overview

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/midterm-reflection-20926553)

    ##### Fixed vs Growth Mindset from Accredited Online Training

    ### Purpose

    Reflection is an opportunity to look back and think about what has occurred in the past and make adjustments for the future. For our class, it is an opportunity to consider individual progress to this point and how to finish out the semester based on those considerations.

    ### Assignment Details

    – After looking over the infographic above that examines the differences in a Fixed v. Growth Mindset,  please address the following response:

    – What is my grade in this class at this time and why do I have this grade?
    – What have I been doing to reach this point?
    – How could I do more to improve my situation?
    – If you were me, how would you describe your performance?
    – If you were me, what advice would you give yourself about the second half of the semester?
    – What has been your greatest achievement so far?
    – On a scale of 1-10 for each bullet, how would you evaluate

    – Your contributions to class discussions/forums
    – The work effort in between deadlines
    – Overall performance

    #### Submit Assignment

    – Use MLA format
    – SA 4 should be 1.5+ pages
    – When SA 4 is complete, please submit it to dropbox
    [SA 4: Midterm Reflection](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=dropbox&rcode=MTC-4219766)

    #### Late Assignment

    Late Assignments are accepted no later than 48 hours after the original deadline.

    [Go to top](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/midterm-reflection-20926553#top)

    ## fixed mindset.jpg

    **## SA4MidtermReflection.html.zip**

    ## SA 4 Midterm Reflection.html

    ## Overview

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/midterm-reflection-20926553)

    ##### Fixed vs Growth Mindset from Accredited Online Training

    ### Purpose

    Reflection is an opportunity to look back and think about what has occurred in the past and make adjustments for the future. For our class, it is an opportunity to consider individual progress to this point and how to finish out the semester based on those considerations.

    ### Assignment Details

    – After looking over the infographic above that examines the differences in a Fixed v. Growth Mindset,  please address the following response:

    – What is my grade in this class at this time and why do I have this grade?
    – What have I been doing to reach this point?
    – How could I do more to improve my situation?
    – If you were me, how would you describe your performance?
    – If you were me, what advice would you give yourself about the second half of the semester?
    – What has been your greatest achievement so far?
    – On a scale of 1-10 for each bullet, how would you evaluate

    – Your contributions to class discussions/forums
    – The work effort in between deadlines
    – Overall performance

    #### Submit Assignment

    – Use MLA format
    – SA 4 should be 1.5+ pages
    – When SA 4 is complete, please submit it to dropbox
    [SA 4: Midterm Reflection](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=dropbox&rcode=MTC-4219766)

    #### Late Assignment

    Late Assignments are accepted no later than 48 hours after the original deadline.

    [Go to top](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/midterm-reflection-20926553#top)

    ## fixed mindset.jpg

  • [Solved] Discussion respibses

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion respibses.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Concept map

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Medical problems and solutions concept map

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Medical problems and solutions concept map

  • [Solved] assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf – Assessmentdescription.PNG **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf** Literature Review Revision – Rubric Summary of existing literature 72 points Criteria Description Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf

    – Assessmentdescription.PNG

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-LiteratureReviewRevision.pdf**

    Literature Review Revision – Rubric

    Summary of existing literature 72 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

    of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    5. Target 72 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

    peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    4. Acceptable 61.2 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

    reviewed sources were cited.

    3. Approaching 54 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

    10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

    2. Insufficient 46.8 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

    the minimum word count.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

    missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

    word count.

    Collapse All

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Proposed research 24 points

    Criteria Description

    Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

    5. Target 24 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

    4. Acceptable 20.4 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

    3. Approaching 18 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is clear.

    2. Insufficient 15.6 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is vague or inadequate.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

    research is missing.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    5. Target 12 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

    directed to a specific audience.

    4. Acceptable 10.2 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

    appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    3. Approaching 9 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    2. Insufficient 7.8 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

    awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

    audience is evident.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Format/Documentation 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 6 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

    errors.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

    in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 120 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Assessmentdescription.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentdescription-png)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Electronic Health Record 1. Answer the following questions: – What is an **EHR**? – What types of **information** are found in an EHR? – Who **manages** an EHR? – How is it **used**? – Does an EHR follow the patient to other **health facilities**? Explain.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Electronic Health Record
    1. Answer the following questions:
    – What is an **EHR**?
    – What types of **information** are found in an EHR?
    – Who **manages** an EHR?
    – How is it **used**?
    – Does an EHR follow the patient to other **health facilities**? Explain.