My Blog

Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] 360METRICSSLP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3SLPtempHRM520.pdf **## Module3SLPtempHRM520.pdf** Module 3 – SLP METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee bei…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3SLPtempHRM520.pdf

    **## Module3SLPtempHRM520.pdf**

    Module 3 – SLP

    METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK;
    INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS

    360-Degree Appraisal

    The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance
    information from several workers who interact with the employee being
    evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors,
    subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also
    evaluate their own work as a part of the 360-degree appraisal process.
    The 360-degree appraisal is designed to provide a comprehensive
    perspective on an employee’s performance. Some organizations use the
    360-degree appraisal process mainly for developmental purposes
    because the results can be contradicting. The 360-degree appraisal
    process is a helpful foundational step to learning an employee’s strengths
    and weaknesses and then using that information for generating goals for
    MBO. Most employees prefer the 360-degree appraisal process because
    of its comprehensiveness and the amount of information that emerges
    from multiple sources. The following image is an example of different
    individuals who could potentially evaluate an employee during a
    360-degree appraisal.

    Potential Individuals Involved in a 360-Degree Feedback Appraisal
    Process

    Assignment

    ● Create a slide presentation that you will be presenting to your
    entire organization relating to the implementation of a
    360-degree feedback appraisal process. Prepare 10-15 slides and
    notes to go along with each.

    ● Make a persuasive presentation. As the VP of HR (known for
    being creative and intelligent), your task will be to define this

    unique performance management appraisal tool, how it will be
    implemented, the added value to each employee of using this
    type of system, and what the consequences might be of an
    employee receiving a low rating.

    SLP Assignment Expectations

    Demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the relevant issues and HRM
    actions, drawing on your background reading and research.

    Information Literacy: Evaluate resources and select only
    library/Web-based resources that provide reliable, substantiated
    information.

    Give authors credit for their work. Cite sources of borrowed information in
    the body of your text as footnotes or numbered end notes, or use APA
    style of referencing.

    Prepare a professional presentation. Proofread carefully for grammar,
    spelling, and word-usage errors.

    – Module 3 – SLP
    – METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS
    – SLP Assignment Expectations

    **## Module3SLPtempHRM520.pdf**

    Module 3 – SLP

    METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK;
    INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS

    360-Degree Appraisal

    The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance
    information from several workers who interact with the employee being
    evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors,
    subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also
    evaluate their own work as a part of the 360-degree appraisal process.
    The 360-degree appraisal is designed to provide a comprehensive
    perspective on an employee’s performance. Some organizations use the
    360-degree appraisal process mainly for developmental purposes
    because the results can be contradicting. The 360-degree appraisal
    process is a helpful foundational step to learning an employee’s strengths
    and weaknesses and then using that information for generating goals for
    MBO. Most employees prefer the 360-degree appraisal process because
    of its comprehensiveness and the amount of information that emerges
    from multiple sources. The following image is an example of different
    individuals who could potentially evaluate an employee during a
    360-degree appraisal.

    Potential Individuals Involved in a 360-Degree Feedback Appraisal
    Process

    Assignment

    ● Create a slide presentation that you will be presenting to your
    entire organization relating to the implementation of a
    360-degree feedback appraisal process. Prepare 10-15 slides and
    notes to go along with each.

    ● Make a persuasive presentation. As the VP of HR (known for
    being creative and intelligent), your task will be to define this

    unique performance management appraisal tool, how it will be
    implemented, the added value to each employee of using this
    type of system, and what the consequences might be of an
    employee receiving a low rating.

    SLP Assignment Expectations

    Demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the relevant issues and HRM
    actions, drawing on your background reading and research.

    Information Literacy: Evaluate resources and select only
    library/Web-based resources that provide reliable, substantiated
    information.

    Give authors credit for their work. Cite sources of borrowed information in
    the body of your text as footnotes or numbered end notes, or use APA
    style of referencing.

    Prepare a professional presentation. Proofread carefully for grammar,
    spelling, and word-usage errors.

    – Module 3 – SLP
    – METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS
    – SLP Assignment Expectations

  • [Solved] 360METRICSCASE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## MODULE3CASETempHRM520.pdf **## MODULE3CASETempHRM520.pdf** Module 3 – Case METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be asse…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## MODULE3CASETempHRM520.pdf

    **## MODULE3CASETempHRM520.pdf**

    Module 3 – Case

    METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK;
    INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS

    Assignment Overview

    Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level

    In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at
    the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for
    this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at
    the “introduced” level. Finally, in HRM599 your skills will be assessed at
    the “emphasized” level.

    Case Assignment

    Background: Judith and Eric Sultan own a business providing HR
    decision-making expertise to employers across the nation. The name of
    their business is HRM Analysis Services. Their business is located in
    Phoenix and has grown exponentially since 2005. Up to this point they
    have not had their own employees, but instead hired established
    consultants (often called management analysts) to work on a
    project-by-project basis.

    They want to hire three full-time management analysts to work in three
    different locations: San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Miami. The analysts
    would scout out work in their designated regions and manage the
    contracting and oversight of contractual consultants.

    Judith and Eric plan to keep ownership of the company, but want to step
    away from the day-to-day as soon as the business is working well enough
    without them.

    The focus of this assignment is to assist Judith and Eric with the selection
    of three Management Analysts by coming up with a weighted formula of
    important selection factors. The Job Applicants Table shows the
    applicants who applied for the position. See What Management
    Analysts Do for a description of the position.

    Your task is to:

    1. Develop a formula to quantify the merits of each applicant based on
    the factors provided. Justify why you gave heavier weight to some
    factors over others.

    2. Develop your own visual/graphic showing how each applicant fared.
    3. Discuss your visual/graphic in essay format.
    4. Recommend 6-8 applicants to proceed to a panel interview phase.
    5. Critique the process of identifying best candidates to proceed in a

    selection process by using a custom-designed formula applied to
    each candidate.

    Use at least 3 library sources to help strengthen your discussion.
    Reference all material cited.

    Your paper plus table(s) should be at least 4-5 pages (not including cover
    sheet and reference page).

    Note: There is no right or wrong formula to use. Use your best judgment
    for a formula based on the factors in the table given. Be sure to also
    spend time on the critical-thinking/analysis phase of this assignment.

    For instruction on writing papers, citing sources, proper referencing, and
    so forth, use Trident University's Student Guide to Writing a
    High-Quality Academic Paper.

    Upload your paper plus table by the module due date.

    Assignment Expectations

    Critical Thinking: Expresses quantitative analysis of data to support the
    discussion showing what evidence is used and how it is contextualized.

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879)

    [https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879)

    Interpretation: explains information presented in mathematical terms
    (e.g., equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, and/or words).

    Presentation: Able to convert relevant information into various
    mathematical terms (e.g., equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, and/or
    words).

    Conclusions: Draws appropriate conclusions based on the analysis of
    factual information/data.

    Timeliness: Submits assignment on time or with professor’s
    pre-approved assignment extension.

    – Module 3 – Case
    – METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS
    – Assignment Overview
    – Case Assignment
    – Assignment Expectations

    **## MODULE3CASETempHRM520.pdf**

    Module 3 – Case

    METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK;
    INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS

    Assignment Overview

    Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level

    In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at
    the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for
    this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at
    the “introduced” level. Finally, in HRM599 your skills will be assessed at
    the “emphasized” level.

    Case Assignment

    Background: Judith and Eric Sultan own a business providing HR
    decision-making expertise to employers across the nation. The name of
    their business is HRM Analysis Services. Their business is located in
    Phoenix and has grown exponentially since 2005. Up to this point they
    have not had their own employees, but instead hired established
    consultants (often called management analysts) to work on a
    project-by-project basis.

    They want to hire three full-time management analysts to work in three
    different locations: San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Miami. The analysts
    would scout out work in their designated regions and manage the
    contracting and oversight of contractual consultants.

    Judith and Eric plan to keep ownership of the company, but want to step
    away from the day-to-day as soon as the business is working well enough
    without them.

    The focus of this assignment is to assist Judith and Eric with the selection
    of three Management Analysts by coming up with a weighted formula of
    important selection factors. The Job Applicants Table shows the
    applicants who applied for the position. See What Management
    Analysts Do for a description of the position.

    Your task is to:

    1. Develop a formula to quantify the merits of each applicant based on
    the factors provided. Justify why you gave heavier weight to some
    factors over others.

    2. Develop your own visual/graphic showing how each applicant fared.
    3. Discuss your visual/graphic in essay format.
    4. Recommend 6-8 applicants to proceed to a panel interview phase.
    5. Critique the process of identifying best candidates to proceed in a

    selection process by using a custom-designed formula applied to
    each candidate.

    Use at least 3 library sources to help strengthen your discussion.
    Reference all material cited.

    Your paper plus table(s) should be at least 4-5 pages (not including cover
    sheet and reference page).

    Note: There is no right or wrong formula to use. Use your best judgment
    for a formula based on the factors in the table given. Be sure to also
    spend time on the critical-thinking/analysis phase of this assignment.

    For instruction on writing papers, citing sources, proper referencing, and
    so forth, use Trident University's Student Guide to Writing a
    High-Quality Academic Paper.

    Upload your paper plus table by the module due date.

    Assignment Expectations

    Critical Thinking: Expresses quantitative analysis of data to support the
    discussion showing what evidence is used and how it is contextualized.

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/224041-HRM520-2025JUN02FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=224041)

    [https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879)

    [https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879)

    Interpretation: explains information presented in mathematical terms
    (e.g., equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, and/or words).

    Presentation: Able to convert relevant information into various
    mathematical terms (e.g., equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, and/or
    words).

    Conclusions: Draws appropriate conclusions based on the analysis of
    factual information/data.

    Timeliness: Submits assignment on time or with professor’s
    pre-approved assignment extension.

    – Module 3 – Case
    – METRICS & ANALYTICS; 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK; INTERNSHIPS/APPRENTICESHIPS
    – Assignment Overview
    – Case Assignment
    – Assignment Expectations

  • [Solved] W1 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering W1 3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Psychology Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please follow up with the instruction . No AI – ## Week2_Assignment4.pdf **## Week2_Assignment4.pdf** Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 1 Allowed Attempts 2 New Attempt Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/mod…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please follow up with the instruction . No AI

    – ## Week2_Assignment4.pdf

    **## Week2_Assignment4.pdf**

    Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 1
    Allowed Attempts 2

    New Attempt

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288

    To understand those around you and society as a whole, it is important to understand yourself—that
    is, to have self-knowledge. Conversely, your understanding of self is informed by your social world.
    Development of self-knowledge is influenced by family and those around you, culture, and the
    countless experiences in one’s life.

    For this Assignment, you examine different facets of your self-knowledge.

    SELF-KNOWLEDGE
    (https://cdn-

    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    RESOURCES

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    Resources

     

    Open-Source Psychometrics Project. (n.d.). Self-monitoring scale
    (https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/) [Interactive].
    https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    High5 Content and Review Team. (2024, October 17). What is self-monitoring?
    Examples & how to do it (https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#) . High5 Test.
    https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    Garcia, S. & Halldorsson, A. (2025). Social comparison (http://noba.to/y4urxhvj) .
    In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. DEF
    publishers. http://noba.to/y4urxhvj

    Read from the beginning through "Direction of Comparison".
    Time Estimate: 7 min

    Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
    Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
    where otherwise noted.

    LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.). Principles of social psychology.
    https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Psychology/Social_Psychology_and_Person

    Chapter 1.2, Affect, Behavior, and Cognition (Summary) (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?
    download_frd=1)

    Time Estimate: 1 min
    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Cognitive dissonance (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) [Interactive]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    Time Estimate: 15 min
    Luttrell, A. (2016, July 7). Cognitive dissonance theory – A crash course
    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY) [Video]. YouTube.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY

    Time Estimate: 7 min

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    PSYC_2005_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

    Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

    Based on Open-Source Psychometrics Project (2019)
    (https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/) and Self-monitoring scale (2024)
    (https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#) , define self-monitoring in your own words, and
    provide an example in which you exhibited high or low self-monitoring.
    Based on Garcia and Halldorsson (2025) (http://noba.to/y4urxhvj) , define upward or
    downward comparison, and provide an example in which you engaged in that type of social
    comparison.

    Identify who you compared yourself to.
    Describe a positive or negative effect of that social comparison on yourself.

    Based on LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1) ,
    the learning activity on cognitive dissonance (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) , and Luttrell’s (2016) video

    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY) , briefly describe a time you
    experienced cognitive dissonance. Explain the source of your cognitive dissonance.

    To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
    the Learning Resources.

    Be sure to review the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
    your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

    1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Definition of
    self-
    monitoring
    and example
    in which
    student
    exhibited high
    or low self-
    monitoring

    20 pts

    Definition of
    upward or
    downward
    social
    comparison
    and example
    in which
    student
    engaged in
    upward or
    downward
    comparison,
    including who
    student
    compared
    self to and a
    positive or
    negative
    effect of the
    social
    comparison

    25 pts

    Description of
    an
    experience of
    cognitive
    dissonance
    and the

    25 pts

    20 to >17.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    17 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    source of
    cognitive
    dissonance

    Format and
    writing

    10 pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    strengthen this
    component.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes more than
    one explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, and an
    effort to cite the original
    source was made if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The submission contains
    few spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English, OR
    these deviations do not
    affect clear
    communication.     Work
    includes at least one
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions and a clear
    attempt at citing the source
    has been made.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    Multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English affect
    clear communication.
    Work does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without
    attempting to cite the
    source.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the
    instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

    **## Week2_Assignment4.pdf**

    Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 1
    Allowed Attempts 2

    New Attempt

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288

    To understand those around you and society as a whole, it is important to understand yourself—that
    is, to have self-knowledge. Conversely, your understanding of self is informed by your social world.
    Development of self-knowledge is influenced by family and those around you, culture, and the
    countless experiences in one’s life.

    For this Assignment, you examine different facets of your self-knowledge.

    SELF-KNOWLEDGE
    (https://cdn-

    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    RESOURCES

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/modules/items/7303288)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

    Resources

     

    Open-Source Psychometrics Project. (n.d.). Self-monitoring scale
    (https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/) [Interactive].
    https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    High5 Content and Review Team. (2024, October 17). What is self-monitoring?
    Examples & how to do it (https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#) . High5 Test.
    https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#

    Time Estimate: 10 min
    Garcia, S. & Halldorsson, A. (2025). Social comparison (http://noba.to/y4urxhvj) .
    In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. DEF
    publishers. http://noba.to/y4urxhvj

    Read from the beginning through "Direction of Comparison".
    Time Estimate: 7 min

    Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
    Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
    where otherwise noted.

    LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.). Principles of social psychology.
    https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Psychology/Social_Psychology_and_Person

    Chapter 1.2, Affect, Behavior, and Cognition (Summary) (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?
    download_frd=1)

    Time Estimate: 1 min
    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Cognitive dissonance (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) [Interactive]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    Time Estimate: 15 min
    Luttrell, A. (2016, July 7). Cognitive dissonance theory – A crash course
    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY) [Video]. YouTube.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY

    Time Estimate: 7 min

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    PSYC_2005_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

    Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

    Based on Open-Source Psychometrics Project (2019)
    (https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/) and Self-monitoring scale (2024)
    (https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#) , define self-monitoring in your own words, and
    provide an example in which you exhibited high or low self-monitoring.
    Based on Garcia and Halldorsson (2025) (http://noba.to/y4urxhvj) , define upward or
    downward comparison, and provide an example in which you engaged in that type of social
    comparison.

    Identify who you compared yourself to.
    Describe a positive or negative effect of that social comparison on yourself.

    Based on LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1) ,
    the learning activity on cognitive dissonance (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) , and Luttrell’s (2016) video

    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY) , briefly describe a time you
    experienced cognitive dissonance. Explain the source of your cognitive dissonance.

    To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
    the Learning Resources.

    Be sure to review the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
    your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

    1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/](https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SMS/)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#](https://high5test.com/self-monitoring/#)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [http://noba.to/y4urxhvj](http://noba.to/y4urxhvj)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/178209/files/14324152/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y17YaZRRvY)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Definition of
    self-
    monitoring
    and example
    in which
    student
    exhibited high
    or low self-
    monitoring

    20 pts

    Definition of
    upward or
    downward
    social
    comparison
    and example
    in which
    student
    engaged in
    upward or
    downward
    comparison,
    including who
    student
    compared
    self to and a
    positive or
    negative
    effect of the
    social
    comparison

    25 pts

    Description of
    an
    experience of
    cognitive
    dissonance
    and the

    25 pts

    20 to >17.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    17 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)
    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    source of
    cognitive
    dissonance

    Format and
    writing

    10 pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    strengthen this
    component.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes more than
    one explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, and an
    effort to cite the original
    source was made if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The submission contains
    few spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English, OR
    these deviations do not
    affect clear
    communication.     Work
    includes at least one
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions and a clear
    attempt at citing the source
    has been made.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    Multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard
    Academic English affect
    clear communication.
    Work does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without
    attempting to cite the
    source.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the
    instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient (Meets
    expectations)

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)

    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

  • [Solved] W1 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering W1 5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Management Problem solving assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Answer 2 main question of the assignment. Detailed explain needed. – ## ProblemSolvingAssignment.docx **## ProblemSolvingAssignment.docx** **Problem Solving Assignment: A** nswer the following questions. To get full credit for your work, your responses to each section must be clearly marked and expl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Answer 2 main question of the assignment. Detailed explain needed.

    – ## ProblemSolvingAssignment.docx

    **## ProblemSolvingAssignment.docx**

    **Problem Solving Assignment: A** nswer the following questions. To get full credit for your work, your responses to each section must be clearly marked and explained. Where needed, show your work with a brief explanation for each part of the question

    **Q1-** In 2017, the Restaurant Hospitality website reported that only 11% of surplus food is being recovered in the food service and restaurant sector, leaving approximately 1.5 billion meals per year uneaten. Assume that this is the true population proportion and that you plan to take a sample survey of 525 companies in the food service and restaurant sector to further investigate their behavior. You suspect that restaurants are doing a far better job in recovering surplus food than what has been reported by the website.
    Suppose that based on the sample you collected restaurants report an average of 59 surplus meals per day of which an equivalent of 51 meals is thrown away. Respond to the following questions:

    a.      Set up the research question and hypotheses. –
    **Let’s set up Accounting related question.**

    b.      Calculate the p-value using the “Norm.dist” Excel command.

    c.      What is your conclusion?

    **Q2-** A computer manufacturer needs 7,500 units of a component to complete an order for a distributor. If done in-house, the fixed cost would be$325,000 with variable cost at $25 per unit. Alternative two is to outsource for a total cost of $75 per unit with a set-up/tooling cost of $50,000 (fixed cost). The selling price for the item is $110. Answer the following questions:

    a.      Determine the breakeven quantity for each alternative.

    b.      Determine the breakeven quantity between the two alternatives. In other words, at what level of production the company would be indifferent between outsourcing the order and in-house production.

    c.      For the current order, should they make the item in-house or outsource it?

    d.      At what order quantity would it become optimal to make the item in-house rather than outsourcing it?

    **## ProblemSolvingAssignment.docx**

    **Problem Solving Assignment: A** nswer the following questions. To get full credit for your work, your responses to each section must be clearly marked and explained. Where needed, show your work with a brief explanation for each part of the question

    **Q1-** In 2017, the Restaurant Hospitality website reported that only 11% of surplus food is being recovered in the food service and restaurant sector, leaving approximately 1.5 billion meals per year uneaten. Assume that this is the true population proportion and that you plan to take a sample survey of 525 companies in the food service and restaurant sector to further investigate their behavior. You suspect that restaurants are doing a far better job in recovering surplus food than what has been reported by the website.
    Suppose that based on the sample you collected restaurants report an average of 59 surplus meals per day of which an equivalent of 51 meals is thrown away. Respond to the following questions:

    a.      Set up the research question and hypotheses. –
    **Let’s set up Accounting related question.**

    b.      Calculate the p-value using the “Norm.dist” Excel command.

    c.      What is your conclusion?

    **Q2-** A computer manufacturer needs 7,500 units of a component to complete an order for a distributor. If done in-house, the fixed cost would be$325,000 with variable cost at $25 per unit. Alternative two is to outsource for a total cost of $75 per unit with a set-up/tooling cost of $50,000 (fixed cost). The selling price for the item is $110. Answer the following questions:

    a.      Determine the breakeven quantity for each alternative.

    b.      Determine the breakeven quantity between the two alternatives. In other words, at what level of production the company would be indifferent between outsourcing the order and in-house production.

    c.      For the current order, should they make the item in-house or outsource it?

    d.      At what order quantity would it become optimal to make the item in-house rather than outsourcing it?

  • [Solved] W1 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering W1 6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Theorists and Developmentally Appropriate Practices

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As an educator, you will need to understand how students learn. This component of instructional planning is important because it provides a foundation and purpose for learning. Studying seminal theorists, or theorists who have significantly influenced the understanding of cognitive processes, is whe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As an educator, you will need to understand how students learn. This component of instructional planning is important because it provides a foundation and purpose for learning. Studying seminal theorists, or theorists who have significantly influenced the understanding of cognitive processes, is where you can start to grasp how students learn.
    Support your work with 2-3 scholarly resources.
    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    \
    ELM-201-RS-T1-Cognitive_Development_Table.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/elm-201-rs-t1-cognitive-development-table-docx "ELM-201-RS-T1-Cognitive_Development_Table.docx")

  • [Solved] mod 2 FHP discussion reply

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply. Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five year…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.
    Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.
    Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
    discussion 1
    The 52-year-old painter presents with exertional chest pain and chronic fatigue that improve with rest. His caregiving responsibilities, excessive weight gain, and past history with mild hyperlipidemia contribute to his cardiovascular risk, and accordingly, an in-depth assessment is crucial to characterize his pain, uncover contributing factors, and tailor an evidence-based management plan that addresses the psychosocial and physiological aspects.
    **Additional History of Present Illness**
    To explore his chest pain, an inquiry into the onset, location, quality, and radiation of the pain is warranted. The advanced practice nurse (APN) should ascertain whether the pain is persistent, its intensity and sharpness, and establish provocation upon exposure to certain postures and heat exposure, while taking his occupation into account. That aside, it is also essential to inquire from him what his associated symptoms are, including diaphoresis, nausea, palpitations, dyspnea on rest, and relief actions apart from rest. According to Joshi and De Lemos (2021), deprescribing patterns like frequency, duration, and change during the past three years are also highly recommended. Anginal equivalent screening, inclusive of jaw and epigastric pain, prevents atypical presentation from being overlooked.
    **Additional Physical Assessment**
    A comprehensive cardiovascular assessment should include auscultation for murmurs and gallops and palpations for the maximal impulse displacement point. That aside, APNs should also check for peripheral edema, jugular venous distension, and carotid bruits and examine lung fields for crackles indicative of pulmonary congestion **.** It is also essential to measure orthostatic vital signs to exclude hypovolemia or autonomic dysfunction. Gabara et al. (2022) highlight that performing a focused musculoskeletal assessment of the chest wall and shoulder girdle helps rule out costochondral or cervical spine etiologies. Ultimately, it is essential to observe his exercise tolerance through a brief walk test if feasible.
    **Considerations for Elevated CRP**
    An elevated C-reactive protein signals systemic inflammation and correlates with atherosclerotic plaque instability. Recognizing that CRP is a non-specific marker, elevations may also reflect obesity, insulin resistance, and chronic stress. In this context, elevated CRP heightens his risk for acute coronary events and may warrant more aggressive lipid-lowering strategies, like high-intensity statin therapy. Manfredi et al. (2022) suggest that monitoring CRP trends alongside lipid profiles to gauge response to anti-inflammatory interventions like statins or lifestyle modification targeting weight reduction and glycemic control is also crucial.
    **Differential Diagnoses**
    While stable angina is high on the differential, considering other etiologies is also crucial. Prinzmetal's (variant) angina may present with transient ECG changes and chest pain at rest. Gastroesophageal reflux disease can mimic anginal discomfort, and this warrants the need for evaluating reflux symptoms. Gabara et al. (2022) highlight that musculoskeletal causes like costochondritis or rotator cuff strain from repetitive overhead painting should be excluded through palpation and range-of-motion testing. Anxiety-induced chest pain warrants consideration, given his history of anxiety and caregiving stress, which may exacerbate cardiac risk through sympathetic activation.
    **Patient Teaching to Modify Risk Factors**
    It is essential to educate the patient on the role of smoking cessation, even though he does not smoke, healthy weight management, and dietary changes, stressing a Mediterranean-style diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins. Manfredi et al. (2022) suggest that APNs should also encourage at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise every week, tailored to his caregiving and work schedule, for instance, brisk walking during breaks. Reviewing stress-management techniques like deep-breathing exercises and referral to counseling resources helps in addressing caregiver burden and anxiety. APNs should reinforce adherence to lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications, explaining their impact on plaque stabilization.
    **Responding to “I Don’t Have Time to Be Sick”**
    APNs should consider validating the patient’s claim on his dedication to family responsibilities while reframing self-care as crucial to his ability to provide that care. The APN should acknowledge his time constraints and collaboratively develop a realistic plan like scheduling briefs, structured self-monitoring at home, and combining medication refills with caregiving tasks. They should stress that timely interventions provided currently have the capacity to prevent more prolonged absenteeism from work and reduce long-term health complications.
    **Conclusion**
    A comprehensive assessment of this patient integrates a detailed history, targeted physical assessment, and interpretation of CRP in the context of systemic inflammation. Differential diagnoses range from stable angina to musculoskeletal and reflux-related chest pain, informing appropriate diagnostic testing. Patient education on lifestyle modification and reframing self-care as a prerequisite for his caregiving role fosters compliance. Collaborative scheduling and empathetic communication guarantee that his medical needs are met without undermining his family commitments, ultimately optimizing cardiovascular outcomes and his overall well-being.
    DISCUSSION 2 IS ATTACHED
    \
    discussion2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion2-docx-10345871 "discussion2.docx")

  • [Solved] Disparity in healthcare

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans, and explore how Advanced Practice Nurses can address healthcare disparities for this group. Document this in a 2 page word document, include a minimum of 4 references published in last 5 years.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans, and explore how Advanced Practice Nurses can address healthcare disparities for this group.
    Document this in a 2 page word document, include a minimum of 4 references published in last 5 years.