My Blog

Tag: Psychology

  • [Solved] scientific method

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attachment – ## scientificmethod.docx **## scientificmethod.docx** **Discussion 1** Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper tit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attachment

    – ## scientificmethod.docx

    **## scientificmethod.docx**

    **Discussion 1**

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled
    [Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=psyh&AN=2017-38006-007&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897), and the article by Henrich et al. titled
    [Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=cmedm&AN=20595995&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897). Also review Standard 8 of the APA
    [_Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct_ Links to an external site.](https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index) from last week.

    Your instructor will post an announcement with the reference for the quantitative research study you will discuss and critique in this discussion. The study will be found in the UAGC Library. Refer to the Library resource
    [_How Do I Find An Article When I Have A Citation?_ Links to an external site.](https://uagconline.libanswers.com/faq/241209) if you need help finding the article.

    In your initial post, consider the following:

    · Compare and contrast the characteristics of experimental and nonexperimental quantitative research.

    · State the research question the researchers were trying to answer in the study.

    · Identify the type of quantitative research design that was used in the assigned study.

    · Evaluate whether the researchers’ conclusion follows logically from the evidence presented.

    · Identify threats to internal and external validity that might apply to how this study was conducted.

    · Determine whether validity threats were addressed by the researchers. If so, describe how this was done.

    · Summarize ethical considerations that were mentioned in the research report.

    · Assess what ethical considerations apply to the design of the study but that were not mentioned by the researchers.

    · Explain how you might do a study on this topic differently and why your approach would be more appropriate than the one used by the researchers.

    · Evaluate whether a quantitative approach would be useful for the research topic you chose in Week 1.

    · Describe the actions you would take to ensure that a quantitative study on your topic would be ethical.

    · Support your evaluation of the study with citations and references of the required readings and other peer-reviewed sources. Refer to the
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) tip sheet to help determine which sources are appropriate.

    **Discussion 2**

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled
    [Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=psyh&AN=2017-38006-007&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897), and the article by Henrich et al. titled
    [Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=cmedm&AN=20595995&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897). Also review Standard 8 of the APA
    [_Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct_ Links to an external site.](https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index) from last week. Your instructor will post an announcement with the assigned research question. You and your colleagues will share ideas about how to research this topic using a quantitative approach.

    In your initial post, consider the following guidelines and questions:

    · Apply the scientific method by developing a null and an alternative hypothesis that provide potential answers to the research question.

    · Review the quantitative research designs in the required readings and choose one that is suitable for your research question and hypotheses. Explain why this choice is most appropriate to test your hypotheses.

    · Describe the target population, the desired sample, and any cultural considerations that may be involved.

    · Identify potential internal and external threats to validity. Explain how you might mitigate these threats.

    · Determine ethical issues that would need to be addressed. Explain what you would do to ensure an ethical study.

    **## scientificmethod.docx**

    **Discussion 1**

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled
    [Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=psyh&AN=2017-38006-007&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897), and the article by Henrich et al. titled
    [Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=cmedm&AN=20595995&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897). Also review Standard 8 of the APA
    [_Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct_ Links to an external site.](https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index) from last week.

    Your instructor will post an announcement with the reference for the quantitative research study you will discuss and critique in this discussion. The study will be found in the UAGC Library. Refer to the Library resource
    [_How Do I Find An Article When I Have A Citation?_ Links to an external site.](https://uagconline.libanswers.com/faq/241209) if you need help finding the article.

    In your initial post, consider the following:

    · Compare and contrast the characteristics of experimental and nonexperimental quantitative research.

    · State the research question the researchers were trying to answer in the study.

    · Identify the type of quantitative research design that was used in the assigned study.

    · Evaluate whether the researchers’ conclusion follows logically from the evidence presented.

    · Identify threats to internal and external validity that might apply to how this study was conducted.

    · Determine whether validity threats were addressed by the researchers. If so, describe how this was done.

    · Summarize ethical considerations that were mentioned in the research report.

    · Assess what ethical considerations apply to the design of the study but that were not mentioned by the researchers.

    · Explain how you might do a study on this topic differently and why your approach would be more appropriate than the one used by the researchers.

    · Evaluate whether a quantitative approach would be useful for the research topic you chose in Week 1.

    · Describe the actions you would take to ensure that a quantitative study on your topic would be ethical.

    · Support your evaluation of the study with citations and references of the required readings and other peer-reviewed sources. Refer to the
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) tip sheet to help determine which sources are appropriate.

    **Discussion 2**

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled
    [Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=psyh&AN=2017-38006-007&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897), and the article by Henrich et al. titled
    [Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=cmedm&AN=20595995&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897). Also review Standard 8 of the APA
    [_Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct_ Links to an external site.](https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index) from last week. Your instructor will post an announcement with the assigned research question. You and your colleagues will share ideas about how to research this topic using a quantitative approach.

    In your initial post, consider the following guidelines and questions:

    · Apply the scientific method by developing a null and an alternative hypothesis that provide potential answers to the research question.

    · Review the quantitative research designs in the required readings and choose one that is suitable for your research question and hypotheses. Explain why this choice is most appropriate to test your hypotheses.

    · Describe the target population, the desired sample, and any cultural considerations that may be involved.

    · Identify potential internal and external threats to validity. Explain how you might mitigate these threats.

    · Determine ethical issues that would need to be addressed. Explain what you would do to ensure an ethical study.

  • [Solved] Week 4 of 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 4 of 5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] case study 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx** Page 2 **PSY1010**– **Touchstone 3.1** Type Your Name Here ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**–
    **Touchstone 3.1**

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As of late, Monica has been noticing that Jordan spends a lot of time focusing on what his friends think about him. Without his mother’s permission, Jordan recently crawled out of his bedroom window and went to a party when he was supposed to be studying for an exam. Upon his return home, Jordan reeked of alcohol and marijuana and was caught by his mother. Shocked and appalled by her son's recent behavior, she grounded him for two weeks.

    Date here

    Using what you have learned about the adolescent brain and social development, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Your goals are to help Monica understand why her son makes the choices he does and recommend some strategies that may help solve the problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What happens inside the brain of a teenager that makes it difficult for Jordan to weigh the risks and rewards of his behavior? Describe how the adolescent brain weighs risk and reward.

    **Question 2:** Why does it appear that Jordan values the opinion of his peers more than the opinion of his mother? Explain the psychological concepts that may account for why Jordan places value on his peers’ opinions.

    **Question 3:** What advice would you give Jordan’s mother, Monica, that would teach him how to make better choices and decisions? Discuss a specific strategy that Monica may implement to help her son make better decisions.

    **Question 4:** If you were in Monica’s shoes, how would you feel? Explain why a better understanding of Monica’s perspective could result in more constructive advice.

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**–
    **Touchstone 3.1**

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As of late, Monica has been noticing that Jordan spends a lot of time focusing on what his friends think about him. Without his mother’s permission, Jordan recently crawled out of his bedroom window and went to a party when he was supposed to be studying for an exam. Upon his return home, Jordan reeked of alcohol and marijuana and was caught by his mother. Shocked and appalled by her son's recent behavior, she grounded him for two weeks.

    Date here

    Using what you have learned about the adolescent brain and social development, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Your goals are to help Monica understand why her son makes the choices he does and recommend some strategies that may help solve the problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What happens inside the brain of a teenager that makes it difficult for Jordan to weigh the risks and rewards of his behavior? Describe how the adolescent brain weighs risk and reward.

    **Question 2:** Why does it appear that Jordan values the opinion of his peers more than the opinion of his mother? Explain the psychological concepts that may account for why Jordan places value on his peers’ opinions.

    **Question 3:** What advice would you give Jordan’s mother, Monica, that would teach him how to make better choices and decisions? Discuss a specific strategy that Monica may implement to help her son make better decisions.

    **Question 4:** If you were in Monica’s shoes, how would you feel? Explain why a better understanding of Monica’s perspective could result in more constructive advice.

  • [Solved] 6241

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    M1 D ## Instructions [Healthy People 2030Links to an external site.](https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health) identifies five domains for social determinants of health (SDOH). Select one of these domains, and one healthcare setting discussed in this module. Describ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    M1 D
    ## Instructions
    [Healthy People 2030Links to an external site.](https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health) identifies five domains for social determinants of health (SDOH). Select one of these domains, and one healthcare setting discussed in this module. Describe how a social worker, as part of that healthcare setting, might assist a patient in addressing health risks in that domain.
    (For example, how might a social worker in a hospital assist individuals in terms of risks due to their social and community context?)
    ### Requirements
    In order to successfully complete this assignment, please use the following guidelines:
    – Submit your initial post by the due date.
    – Review the [discussion rubric](https://learnonline.yu.edu/courses/2122/files/402487?wrap=1) for details on grading criteria.
    – Your initial post should be 2-3 paragraphs in length.
    – Your post should be written in a professional tone, free of grammar and spelling errors.
    – You must respond to at least **two** of your peers by the end of the module.
    – In your responses, you must critically engage with your peers. A simple "I agree/disagree" will not be considered sufficient.
    – Be sure to cite any sources using APA format.
    M1 RA
    ## Instructions
    After reading "Childhood Origins of Adult Health", you should have an idea of not only what the life course perspective is and entails, but also how policy can assist in improving outcomes throughout the lifespan. For this assignment, answer the following questions.
    – Define the life course perspective, as laid out by Forrest & Riley.
    – Provide an example (not mentioned in the article) of a childhood risk that can lead to an adult outcome.
    – Provide an example (not mentioned in the article) of a childhood area of resilience that can lead to an adult outcome.
    ### Requirements
    – Thoroughly address all of the questions in this assignment.
    – Use the readings, lecture material and any related content to explain your reasoning.
    – Your document should be 2-3 pages in length, double spaced using 12-point font.
    – You must include at least three citations of scholarly sources in APA format.
    m2 d
    ## Instructions
    This question invites you to use the readings, the presentation, and your own research to think about the following.
    – Briefly discuss the process of applying to one of the entitlement programs we have discussed. Include criteria to qualify and an outline of the application process (if choosing Medicaid, you can discuss the process of applying to Medicaid in your state).
    – What challenges, if any, do you identify in the application process?
    – Reflecting on the other social determinants of health, do you see any factors that may hinder access to a needed program?
    ### Requirements
    In order to successfully complete this assignment, please use the following guidelines:
    – Submit your initial post by the due date.
    – Review the [discussion rubric](https://learnonline.yu.edu/courses/2122/files/402487?wrap=1) for details on grading criteria.
    – Your initial post should be 2-3 paragraphs in length.
    – Your post should be written in a professional tone and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    – You must respond to at least **two** of your peers by the end of the module.
    – In your responses, you must critically engage with your peers. A simple "I agree/disagree" will not be considered sufficient.
    – Be sure to cite any sources using APA format.

  • [Solved] Psychology Homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Help with an assignment – ## Week6assignment.pdf **## Week6assignment.pdf** ● ○ ○ ● ● ● ● ● ● ○ ● ● ● ● ● ● To prepare: Review the following articles from the Learning Resources: “Living happily despite having an illness: Perceptions of healthy aging among Korean American, Vietnamese American, and L…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Help with an assignment

    – ## Week6assignment.pdf

    **## Week6assignment.pdf**

    ●
    ○

    ○

    ●

    ●
    ●

    ●

    ●

    ●

    ○

    ●

    ●
    ●
    ●
    ●
    ●

    To prepare:
    Review the following articles from the Learning Resources:

    “Living happily despite having an illness: Perceptions of healthy aging among Korean
    American, Vietnamese American, and Latino older adults" by Nguyen, Lee, Sorkin, and
    Gibbs.
    "Personality Development Across the Lifespan: Theory, Research, and Application" by
    Griffin, Mroczek, and Wesbecher.

    Using your potential doctoral capstone topic as a guide, identify a specific topic with which
    you can incorporate Levinson’s theory on midlife development or Neugarten’s theory on aging
    and one of the three diverse populations (Asian immigrants, Latino immigrants, or Native
    Americans). For example, if your topic is domestic violence, a specific topic that incorporates
    the above elements might be domestic violence among Latino immigrant elders.

    Submit a 2- to 3-page analysis that addresses the following:
    Identify your topic and its connection to a diverse population group.
    In 2–3 sentences, briefly summarize the assumptions of the life span development theory you
    selected.
    Describe the cultural values and belief systems of the group you chose, using literature to
    ground your claims.
    Analyze the extent to which the assumptions of Levinson’s theory or Neugarten’s theory are
    culturally relevant to the group you selected.
    Relative to the topic and population, describe one social work practice recommendation from
    each of the micro, meso, and macro levels when working with the population in relation to
    your topic or problem.

    Remember that the social work practice recommendations need to be informed by the
    life span theory you selected.

    Evaluate how the life span theory you selected is consistent with social work ethics.
    Be sure to:

    Use literature to support your claims.
    Use APA formatting and style, including double-spacing.

    **## Week6assignment.pdf**

    ●
    ○

    ○

    ●

    ●
    ●

    ●

    ●

    ●

    ○

    ●

    ●
    ●
    ●
    ●
    ●

    To prepare:
    Review the following articles from the Learning Resources:

    “Living happily despite having an illness: Perceptions of healthy aging among Korean
    American, Vietnamese American, and Latino older adults" by Nguyen, Lee, Sorkin, and
    Gibbs.
    "Personality Development Across the Lifespan: Theory, Research, and Application" by
    Griffin, Mroczek, and Wesbecher.

    Using your potential doctoral capstone topic as a guide, identify a specific topic with which
    you can incorporate Levinson’s theory on midlife development or Neugarten’s theory on aging
    and one of the three diverse populations (Asian immigrants, Latino immigrants, or Native
    Americans). For example, if your topic is domestic violence, a specific topic that incorporates
    the above elements might be domestic violence among Latino immigrant elders.

    Submit a 2- to 3-page analysis that addresses the following:
    Identify your topic and its connection to a diverse population group.
    In 2–3 sentences, briefly summarize the assumptions of the life span development theory you
    selected.
    Describe the cultural values and belief systems of the group you chose, using literature to
    ground your claims.
    Analyze the extent to which the assumptions of Levinson’s theory or Neugarten’s theory are
    culturally relevant to the group you selected.
    Relative to the topic and population, describe one social work practice recommendation from
    each of the micro, meso, and macro levels when working with the population in relation to
    your topic or problem.

    Remember that the social work practice recommendations need to be informed by the
    life span theory you selected.

    Evaluate how the life span theory you selected is consistent with social work ethics.
    Be sure to:

    Use literature to support your claims.
    Use APA formatting and style, including double-spacing.

  • [Solved] discussion board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_4990.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4990-jpeg-10352475 "IMG_4990.jpeg") \ IMG_4989.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4989-jpeg-10352477 "IMG_4989.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_4990.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4990-jpeg-10352475 "IMG_4990.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_4989.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4989-jpeg-10352477 "IMG_4989.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_2638.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2638-jpeg-10352303 "IMG_2638.jpeg") \ IMG_2639.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2639-jpeg-10352305 "IMG_2639.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_2638.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2638-jpeg-10352303 "IMG_2638.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2639.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2639-jpeg-10352305 "IMG_2639.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_2643.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2643-jpeg "IMG_2643.jpeg") \ IMG_2648.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2648-jpeg-10352367 "IMG_2648.jpeg") \ IMG_2641.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2641-jpeg-10352369 "IMG_2641.jpeg") \ IMG_2642.jpeg](https://www.sw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_2643.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2643-jpeg "IMG_2643.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2648.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2648-jpeg-10352367 "IMG_2648.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2641.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2641-jpeg-10352369 "IMG_2641.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2642.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2642-jpeg-10352371 "IMG_2642.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2647.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2647-jpeg "IMG_2647.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2644.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2644-jpeg "IMG_2644.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully. – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf – IMG_2654.jpeg – IMG_2652.jpeg – IMG_2653.jpeg **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf** Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf

    – IMG_2654.jpeg
    – IMG_2652.jpeg
    – IMG_2653.jpeg

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4