Executive Solution Overview
Attached Using the words attached – ## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf – ## COURSEDESCRIPTION3.pdf – ## COURSEDESCRIPTION1.pdf – ## Unit2_WritingAssignment.pdf – IMG_4616.jpg **## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf** 19 RECORDING AND ANALYZING SPELLING Student: Grade: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Attached
Using the words attached
– ## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf
– ## COURSEDESCRIPTION3.pdf
– ## COURSEDESCRIPTION1.pdf
– ## Unit2_WritingAssignment.pdf
– IMG_4616.jpg
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf**
19
RECORDING AND ANALYZING SPELLING
Student: Grade:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
SPELLED CORRECTLY
STAGE OF
DEVELOPMENT
STUDENT RESULT
0 Emergent
1-5 Alphabetic
6-10 Within-word pattern
11-15 Syllables and affixes
16-25 Derivational relations
Teacher Comments:
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION3.pdf**
28
Weekly Intervention Report Checklist – 35 points
Criteria Yes No
Student grade level indicated 1 pt 0 pts
Focus of Intervention stated 1 pt 0 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
• Student results on pretest clearly described
• Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of
need, area(s) targeted for intervention
• Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude
• Student attitude towards intervention process
described
• Student response to intervention described
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result
• Posttest data clearly presented
• Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of
intervention clearly described
• Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pt 0 pts
Student assessment pages included in report 1 pt 0 pts
Report uploaded as one document 1 pt 0 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines 1 pt 0 pts
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION1.pdf**
26
APPENDIX B
Rubric for Weekly Discussion Forum Participation Points
(4 points for initial post; 2 points for each response)
NOTE: All initial posts are due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. each week. All responses to colleagues are
due by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. each week.
Fully Met (2 pts) Partially Met (1 pt) Not Met (0 pts)
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Reveals
accurate
understanding of key
concepts/ideas
Post’s ideas are consistent
with the readings and
lectures and accurately
represent key concepts
and ideas.
Post’s ideas are related to
the readings and lectures
and accurately represent
key concepts and ideas,
but some elements of the
prompt are weak or
lacking in substance.
Post’s ideas are
inconsistent with the
readings and/or lectures
and do not accurately
address key concepts and
ideas.
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Integrates
specifics from
readings and/or
experiences
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
AND personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
OR personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post consists of opinions
unsupported by evidence
from readings or personal
teaching experiences.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #1
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #2
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #3
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
NOTE 1: Presence of grammatical or mechanical errors in a post limits a grade to
“Partially Met” if errors are few or minimal or “Not Met” if multiple errors are
present.
NOTE 2: One “Response to Classmate” can be a continuation of a discussion with the
same classmate. The continued discussion must be substantive and continue to add to
the conversation.
**## Unit2_WritingAssignment.pdf**
Unit 2: Writing Assignment
Due Saturday by 11:59pm
Points 35
Submitting a file upload
Intervention Week 2
Start Assignment
Writing Assignment: Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m.
Intervention #1 – Spelling
You are providing Tier III interventions for the student you’ve selected for your case study.
Day One – Using the Recording and Analyzing Spelling handout (in Appendix A and
copied into Canvas), administer Informal Spelling Inventory One Sets 1-5 in the C.53
appendix of your textbook and analyze the results. Using the spelling intervention
strategies in your textbook that are appropriate to the age/grade level of your student,
determine your intervention strategy based on the results of the assessment. Use one
strategy with your student.
Day Two – Conduct a 30-minute intervention with your student
Day Three – Conduct a short intervention with your student. Administer the Informal
Spelling Inventory Two Sets 1-5 in the C.53 appendix of your textbook and analyze the
results to determine effectiveness of your interventions.
Write a report on the intervention experience. See Appendix B for the report template.
Focus of Intervention
Description of intervention(s) used
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
Description of intervention protocol (i.e. how did you administer the intervention?)
Description of the students' attitude and response to the intervention experiences
Results of intervention – effectiveness in achieving desired goals
Upload as one file your student’s Spelling sheet and your report.
See Appendix B for the scoring checklist
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 1/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
Student grade level indicated
1 pts
Focus of Intervention stated
1 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s) • Student results on pretest
clearly described • Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of need,
area(s) targeted for intervention • Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three • Appropriate administration of
the intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude • Student attitude towards
intervention process described • Student response to intervention described 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result • Posttest data clearly presented •
Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of intervention clearly described •
Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pts
Student assessment pages included in report
1 pts
Report uploaded as one document
1 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines
1 pts
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 2/3
Total Points: 35
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 3/3
**IMG_4616.jpg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4616-jpg-10341855)
**IMG_4616.jpg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4616-jpg-10341855)
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf**
19
RECORDING AND ANALYZING SPELLING
Student: Grade:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
SPELLED CORRECTLY
STAGE OF
DEVELOPMENT
STUDENT RESULT
0 Emergent
1-5 Alphabetic
6-10 Within-word pattern
11-15 Syllables and affixes
16-25 Derivational relations
Teacher Comments:
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION3.pdf**
28
Weekly Intervention Report Checklist – 35 points
Criteria Yes No
Student grade level indicated 1 pt 0 pts
Focus of Intervention stated 1 pt 0 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
• Student results on pretest clearly described
• Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of
need, area(s) targeted for intervention
• Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude
• Student attitude towards intervention process
described
• Student response to intervention described
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result
• Posttest data clearly presented
• Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of
intervention clearly described
• Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pt 0 pts
Student assessment pages included in report 1 pt 0 pts
Report uploaded as one document 1 pt 0 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines 1 pt 0 pts
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION1.pdf**
26
APPENDIX B
Rubric for Weekly Discussion Forum Participation Points
(4 points for initial post; 2 points for each response)
NOTE: All initial posts are due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. each week. All responses to colleagues are
due by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. each week.
Fully Met (2 pts) Partially Met (1 pt) Not Met (0 pts)
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Reveals
accurate
understanding of key
concepts/ideas
Post’s ideas are consistent
with the readings and
lectures and accurately
represent key concepts
and ideas.
Post’s ideas are related to
the readings and lectures
and accurately represent
key concepts and ideas,
but some elements of the
prompt are weak or
lacking in substance.
Post’s ideas are
inconsistent with the
readings and/or lectures
and do not accurately
address key concepts and
ideas.
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Integrates
specifics from
readings and/or
experiences
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
AND personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
OR personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post consists of opinions
unsupported by evidence
from readings or personal
teaching experiences.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #1
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #2
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #3
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
NOTE 1: Presence of grammatical or mechanical errors in a post limits a grade to
“Partially Met” if errors are few or minimal or “Not Met” if multiple errors are
present.
NOTE 2: One “Response to Classmate” can be a continuation of a discussion with the
same classmate. The continued discussion must be substantive and continue to add to
the conversation.
**## Unit2_WritingAssignment.pdf**
Unit 2: Writing Assignment
Due Saturday by 11:59pm
Points 35
Submitting a file upload
Intervention Week 2
Start Assignment
Writing Assignment: Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m.
Intervention #1 – Spelling
You are providing Tier III interventions for the student you’ve selected for your case study.
Day One – Using the Recording and Analyzing Spelling handout (in Appendix A and
copied into Canvas), administer Informal Spelling Inventory One Sets 1-5 in the C.53
appendix of your textbook and analyze the results. Using the spelling intervention
strategies in your textbook that are appropriate to the age/grade level of your student,
determine your intervention strategy based on the results of the assessment. Use one
strategy with your student.
Day Two – Conduct a 30-minute intervention with your student
Day Three – Conduct a short intervention with your student. Administer the Informal
Spelling Inventory Two Sets 1-5 in the C.53 appendix of your textbook and analyze the
results to determine effectiveness of your interventions.
Write a report on the intervention experience. See Appendix B for the report template.
Focus of Intervention
Description of intervention(s) used
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
Description of intervention protocol (i.e. how did you administer the intervention?)
Description of the students' attitude and response to the intervention experiences
Results of intervention – effectiveness in achieving desired goals
Upload as one file your student’s Spelling sheet and your report.
See Appendix B for the scoring checklist
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 1/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
Student grade level indicated
1 pts
Focus of Intervention stated
1 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s) • Student results on pretest
clearly described • Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of need,
area(s) targeted for intervention • Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three • Appropriate administration of
the intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude • Student attitude towards
intervention process described • Student response to intervention described 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result • Posttest data clearly presented •
Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of intervention clearly described •
Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pts
Student assessment pages included in report
1 pts
Report uploaded as one document
1 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines
1 pts
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 2/3
Total Points: 35
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 3/3
**IMG_4616.jpg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4616-jpg-10341855)
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION.pdf**
19
RECORDING AND ANALYZING SPELLING
Student: Grade:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
SPELLED CORRECTLY
STAGE OF
DEVELOPMENT
STUDENT RESULT
0 Emergent
1-5 Alphabetic
6-10 Within-word pattern
11-15 Syllables and affixes
16-25 Derivational relations
Teacher Comments:
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION3.pdf**
28
Weekly Intervention Report Checklist – 35 points
Criteria Yes No
Student grade level indicated 1 pt 0 pts
Focus of Intervention stated 1 pt 0 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
• Student results on pretest clearly described
• Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of
need, area(s) targeted for intervention
• Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention
5 pt 0 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three
• Appropriate administration of the intervention
• At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude
• Student attitude towards intervention process
described
• Student response to intervention described
5 pt 0 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result
• Posttest data clearly presented
• Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of
intervention clearly described
• Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pt 0 pts
Student assessment pages included in report 1 pt 0 pts
Report uploaded as one document 1 pt 0 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines 1 pt 0 pts
**## COURSEDESCRIPTION1.pdf**
26
APPENDIX B
Rubric for Weekly Discussion Forum Participation Points
(4 points for initial post; 2 points for each response)
NOTE: All initial posts are due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. each week. All responses to colleagues are
due by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. each week.
Fully Met (2 pts) Partially Met (1 pt) Not Met (0 pts)
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Reveals
accurate
understanding of key
concepts/ideas
Post’s ideas are consistent
with the readings and
lectures and accurately
represent key concepts
and ideas.
Post’s ideas are related to
the readings and lectures
and accurately represent
key concepts and ideas,
but some elements of the
prompt are weak or
lacking in substance.
Post’s ideas are
inconsistent with the
readings and/or lectures
and do not accurately
address key concepts and
ideas.
INITIAL
RESPONSE TO
PROMPT: Integrates
specifics from
readings and/or
experiences
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
AND personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post interweaves specific
evidence from readings
OR personal teaching
experiences to support
argument.
Post consists of opinions
unsupported by evidence
from readings or personal
teaching experiences.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #1
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #2
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
RESPONSE TO
CLASSMATE #3
Response offers a
substantive discussion or
elaboration on the key
elements in the original
post.
Response offers a
discussion of the key
elements in the original
post.
Response lacks substance;
it is primarily an
agreement with or
acknowledgement of the
original post.
NOTE 1: Presence of grammatical or mechanical errors in a post limits a grade to
“Partially Met” if errors are few or minimal or “Not Met” if multiple errors are
present.
NOTE 2: One “Response to Classmate” can be a continuation of a discussion with the
same classmate. The continued discussion must be substantive and continue to add to
the conversation.
**## Unit2_WritingAssignment.pdf**
Unit 2: Writing Assignment
Due Saturday by 11:59pm
Points 35
Submitting a file upload
Intervention Week 2
Start Assignment
Writing Assignment: Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m.
Intervention #1 – Spelling
You are providing Tier III interventions for the student you’ve selected for your case study.
Day One – Using the Recording and Analyzing Spelling handout (in Appendix A and
copied into Canvas), administer Informal Spelling Inventory One Sets 1-5 in the C.53
appendix of your textbook and analyze the results. Using the spelling intervention
strategies in your textbook that are appropriate to the age/grade level of your student,
determine your intervention strategy based on the results of the assessment. Use one
strategy with your student.
Day Two – Conduct a 30-minute intervention with your student
Day Three – Conduct a short intervention with your student. Administer the Informal
Spelling Inventory Two Sets 1-5 in the C.53 appendix of your textbook and analyze the
results to determine effectiveness of your interventions.
Write a report on the intervention experience. See Appendix B for the report template.
Focus of Intervention
Description of intervention(s) used
Justification for selection of the intervention(s)
Description of intervention protocol (i.e. how did you administer the intervention?)
Description of the students' attitude and response to the intervention experiences
Results of intervention – effectiveness in achieving desired goals
Upload as one file your student’s Spelling sheet and your report.
See Appendix B for the scoring checklist
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 1/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
Student grade level indicated
1 pts
Focus of Intervention stated
1 pts
Justification for selection of the intervention(s) • Student results on pretest
clearly described • Pretest data clearly interpreted to indicate area(s) of need,
area(s) targeted for intervention • Intervention plan is based on grade level and
assessment data
5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day One • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Two • Appropriate administration of the
intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Description of Interventions Used: Day Three • Appropriate administration of
the intervention • At least 30 minutes spent in intervention/assessment 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Attitude • Student attitude towards
intervention process described • Student response to intervention described 5 pts
Results of Intervention – Student Result • Posttest data clearly presented •
Posttest data clearly analyzed and results of intervention clearly described •
Suggestions for future interventions included
5 pts
Student assessment pages included in report
1 pts
Report uploaded as one document
1 pts
Paper properly formatted according to APA guidelines
1 pts
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
5 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
1 pts
Yes
0 pts
No
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 2/3
Total Points: 35
7/5/25, 10:32 AM Unit 2: Writing Assignment
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/47879/assignments/886623 3/3
**IMG_4616.jpg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4616-jpg-10341855)
– 1
– 2
– 3
– 4
– 5
Leave a Reply