[Solved] Lecture Signature

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## SignatureInstructions.pdf

**## SignatureInstructions.pdf**

For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to
a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3
references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the
paper:

● Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
● Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a

separate page. This will be page 2.
● Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and

kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
● Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings

that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., “Abnormal Glucose Levels” for
question 1).

○ Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and
provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each
prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).

○ Maintain the order of questions when answering.
● Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.

Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the
rubric for complete grading criteria.

Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease

Cynthia, a 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room due to feeling
constantly tired, hungry, thirsty, and with frequent urination. Her past medical
history is significant for cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease. Physical
examination had revealed yellowish discoloration to the skin, multiple bruises,
bilateral edema, and weakness lasting more than three weeks. Laboratory tests
were ordered (results provided below) after which she was prescribed metformin
and informed to contact a doctor if she starts experiencing nausea, vomiting, fast
breathing, and/or lethargy, as metformin has been known to cause metabolic
acidosis.

Complete Blood Count (CBC)

Sodium 126 mEq/L

Glucose 220 mg/dl

Calcium 7.1 mg/dl

Red blood cell
count

3.9 million cells/ul

Iron 40 mcg/dL

Albumin 2.5 g/dl

Vitals

Blood pressure 86/56 mmHg

Hormone Panel

Renin Low

ADH Elevated

Aldosterone Low

Vitamins

Vit D Low

Vit K Low

Vit E Low

Vit A Low

Urine and Stool Sample

Stool color Gray

Stool content Increase fat
content

Urine color Clear

Glucose Present

Answer the following questions regarding Cynthia’s case:

1. What hormone is not functioning properly causing Cynthia’s glucose
levels to be abnormal? Furthermore, explain in depth how this hormone
regulates blood glucose levels.

2. What other hormone(s) are responsible for maintaining normal glucose
levels? Explain in depth how they work.

3. Explain why Cynthia is presenting with excessive thirst (polydipsia),
tiredness and hunger (polyphagia), and frequent urination (polyuria).

4. Explain why Cynthia is experiencing hypotension. How does the body
and its various organ systems bring the blood pressure back towards
homeostasis?

5. What do you expect Cynthia’s heart rate and end-diastolic volume (EDV)
to be (elevated, normal, or low) and justify your expectation with
cardiovascular formulas such as cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume
(SV).

6. What is the importance of iron in the body and the consequence of it
being 40 mcg/dL?

7. Explain in detail what gluconeogenesis is and where in the body it
occurs? Knowing that gluconeogenesis helps maintain blood glucose
level, what is the effect of metformin on the management of diabetes
mellitus type 2?

8. Looking at Cynthia’s albumin levels, what effect does it have on her (a)
blood osmolarity (b) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and (c) urine
volume?

9. Explain how glucose is normally reabsorbed by the kidneys? What is
happening in Cynthia’s kidneys resulting in glucosuria and what effect
does glucosuria have on her blood pressure?

10. If Cynthia ends up developing metabolic acidosis, what would the levels

of her pH, CO2, and HCO3 be in the blood? Furthermore, how would the
body compensate and address both renal and respiratory compensation
(optional: show the compensation via a flow chart)?

Rubric

PHYS 261 Signature Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #1

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #2

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #3

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #4

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #5

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #6

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #7

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #8

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information
may not be scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #9

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #10

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Organization
and
Assignment
Requirement
s

5.6 to >4.76 ptsDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion serve to
bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Presents
coherently and logically organized ideas that are thoughtful and
in-depth. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of
the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all
sources meet the assignment specifications.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsDemonstrates an adequate understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion generally
serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic, but there
may be some redundancy or unnecessary information. Ideas are
mostly coherent and organized. Meets all length requirements and
addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of
resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsDemonstrates a vague or incorrect understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion do not add
cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Several ideas are
incoherent and disorganized. Meets some length requirements and
addresses some aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number
of resources, and some meet the assignment specifications.

3.3 to >0 ptsDemonstrates little or no understanding of the topic(s) and
issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion are missing or
insufficient. Meets few, if any, assignment and reference criteria.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

APA and
Mechanics

8.4 to >7.14 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format
and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There
are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are
cited and referenced correctly.

7.14 to >6.05 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA
format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited
and referenced correctly.

6.05 to >4.96 ptsThe assignment does not follow current APA format
and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many
sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and
references are missing where needed.

4.96 to >0 ptsNo attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are
not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors
significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

8.4
pts

Total Points: 70

– Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease
– Rubric

**## SignatureInstructions.pdf**

For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to
a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3
references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the
paper:

● Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
● Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a

separate page. This will be page 2.
● Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and

kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
● Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings

that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., “Abnormal Glucose Levels” for
question 1).

○ Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and
provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each
prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).

○ Maintain the order of questions when answering.
● Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.

Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the
rubric for complete grading criteria.

Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease

Cynthia, a 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room due to feeling
constantly tired, hungry, thirsty, and with frequent urination. Her past medical
history is significant for cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease. Physical
examination had revealed yellowish discoloration to the skin, multiple bruises,
bilateral edema, and weakness lasting more than three weeks. Laboratory tests
were ordered (results provided below) after which she was prescribed metformin
and informed to contact a doctor if she starts experiencing nausea, vomiting, fast
breathing, and/or lethargy, as metformin has been known to cause metabolic
acidosis.

Complete Blood Count (CBC)

Sodium 126 mEq/L

Glucose 220 mg/dl

Calcium 7.1 mg/dl

Red blood cell
count

3.9 million cells/ul

Iron 40 mcg/dL

Albumin 2.5 g/dl

Vitals

Blood pressure 86/56 mmHg

Hormone Panel

Renin Low

ADH Elevated

Aldosterone Low

Vitamins

Vit D Low

Vit K Low

Vit E Low

Vit A Low

Urine and Stool Sample

Stool color Gray

Stool content Increase fat
content

Urine color Clear

Glucose Present

Answer the following questions regarding Cynthia’s case:

1. What hormone is not functioning properly causing Cynthia’s glucose
levels to be abnormal? Furthermore, explain in depth how this hormone
regulates blood glucose levels.

2. What other hormone(s) are responsible for maintaining normal glucose
levels? Explain in depth how they work.

3. Explain why Cynthia is presenting with excessive thirst (polydipsia),
tiredness and hunger (polyphagia), and frequent urination (polyuria).

4. Explain why Cynthia is experiencing hypotension. How does the body
and its various organ systems bring the blood pressure back towards
homeostasis?

5. What do you expect Cynthia’s heart rate and end-diastolic volume (EDV)
to be (elevated, normal, or low) and justify your expectation with
cardiovascular formulas such as cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume
(SV).

6. What is the importance of iron in the body and the consequence of it
being 40 mcg/dL?

7. Explain in detail what gluconeogenesis is and where in the body it
occurs? Knowing that gluconeogenesis helps maintain blood glucose
level, what is the effect of metformin on the management of diabetes
mellitus type 2?

8. Looking at Cynthia’s albumin levels, what effect does it have on her (a)
blood osmolarity (b) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and (c) urine
volume?

9. Explain how glucose is normally reabsorbed by the kidneys? What is
happening in Cynthia’s kidneys resulting in glucosuria and what effect
does glucosuria have on her blood pressure?

10. If Cynthia ends up developing metabolic acidosis, what would the levels

of her pH, CO2, and HCO3 be in the blood? Furthermore, how would the
body compensate and address both renal and respiratory compensation
(optional: show the compensation via a flow chart)?

Rubric

PHYS 261 Signature Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #1

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #2

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #3

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #4

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #5

5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically
sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt
correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly
scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt
correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically
sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion
of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound,
necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #6

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #7

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #8

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information
may not be scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #9

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content/Info
rmation
Prompt #10

5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth
and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary,
and sufficient.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth
or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough,
necessary, and sufficient.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is
mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.

3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.
Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Organization
and
Assignment
Requirement
s

5.6 to >4.76 ptsDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion serve to
bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Presents
coherently and logically organized ideas that are thoughtful and
in-depth. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of
the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all
sources meet the assignment specifications.

4.76 to >4.03 ptsDemonstrates an adequate understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion generally
serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic, but there
may be some redundancy or unnecessary information. Ideas are
mostly coherent and organized. Meets all length requirements and
addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of
resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications.

4.03 to >3.3 ptsDemonstrates a vague or incorrect understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion do not add
cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Several ideas are
incoherent and disorganized. Meets some length requirements and
addresses some aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number
of resources, and some meet the assignment specifications.

3.3 to >0 ptsDemonstrates little or no understanding of the topic(s) and
issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion are missing or
insufficient. Meets few, if any, assignment and reference criteria.

5.6
pts

This
criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome

APA and
Mechanics

8.4 to >7.14 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format
and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There
are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are
cited and referenced correctly.

7.14 to >6.05 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA
format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited
and referenced correctly.

6.05 to >4.96 ptsThe assignment does not follow current APA format
and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many
sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and
references are missing where needed.

4.96 to >0 ptsNo attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are
not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors
significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

8.4
pts

Total Points: 70

– Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease
– Rubric