[Solved] Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## Presentation-CriticalReviewEvaluationofHealthPromotionProtocolPractice.docx

**## Presentation-CriticalReviewEvaluationofHealthPromotionProtocolPractice.docx**

**_Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice_**

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.

**Your presentation should**:

1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.

**_Note:_** Read Chapter 9 in Edelman, C. L., & Kudzma, E. C. (2021) to inform your response.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.

· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years)
_scholarly journal articles_ or
_primary legal sources_ (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

· PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

· The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

· Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

· Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.


**Grading Rubric**

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

**Presentation Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Presentation Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Distinguished**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |

## image1.png

**## Presentation-CriticalReviewEvaluationofHealthPromotionProtocolPractice.docx**

**_Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice_**

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.

**Your presentation should**:

1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.

**_Note:_** Read Chapter 9 in Edelman, C. L., & Kudzma, E. C. (2021) to inform your response.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.

· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years)
_scholarly journal articles_ or
_primary legal sources_ (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

· PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

· The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

· Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

· Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.


**Grading Rubric**

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

**Presentation Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Presentation Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
| **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Distinguished**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |

## image1.png