Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## Wk10instructions.docx
**## Wk10instructions.docx**
Your task is to
**apply the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC)** to this scenario and develop a
**2–3 page role description** for a
**graduate-level nurse leader** serving on the implementation team. The focus is on ensuring the system is usable, acceptable, and supportive of nursing workflow, while clearly demonstrating how nurse leadership adds value throughout the process.
As you prepare your paper, be sure to:
·
**Briefly reflect on the scenario** and explain why a nurse leader must be part of the implementation team.
·
**Discuss both benefits and challenges** of involving a nurse leader in health information technology implementation.
·
**Structure the role description around the SDLC stages**, clearly outlining how the nurse leader contributes to and impacts each phase:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Write from a
**graduate-level leadership perspective**, emphasizing communication, advocacy, workflow alignment, usability, and change management.
· Include
**3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.**
Use clear headings tied to the SDLC phases, integrate evidence where appropriate, and ensure your role description goes beyond listing tasks by explaining
_how_ the nurse leader influences successful adoption. This assignment is designed to connect informatics theory to real-world nursing leadership practice. Use the scenario to make those connections explicit.
**The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page)**
In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
· Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your completed Role Description.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:· Planning and requirements definition· Analysis· Design of the new system· Implementation· Post-implementation support | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis· Design of the new system | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Implementation· Post-implementation support | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Assignment includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## Wk10instructions.docx**
Your task is to
**apply the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC)** to this scenario and develop a
**2–3 page role description** for a
**graduate-level nurse leader** serving on the implementation team. The focus is on ensuring the system is usable, acceptable, and supportive of nursing workflow, while clearly demonstrating how nurse leadership adds value throughout the process.
As you prepare your paper, be sure to:
·
**Briefly reflect on the scenario** and explain why a nurse leader must be part of the implementation team.
·
**Discuss both benefits and challenges** of involving a nurse leader in health information technology implementation.
·
**Structure the role description around the SDLC stages**, clearly outlining how the nurse leader contributes to and impacts each phase:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Write from a
**graduate-level leadership perspective**, emphasizing communication, advocacy, workflow alignment, usability, and change management.
· Include
**3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.**
Use clear headings tied to the SDLC phases, integrate evidence where appropriate, and ensure your role description goes beyond listing tasks by explaining
_how_ the nurse leader influences successful adoption. This assignment is designed to connect informatics theory to real-world nursing leadership practice. Use the scenario to make those connections explicit.
**The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page)**
In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
· Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your completed Role Description.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:· Planning and requirements definition· Analysis· Design of the new system· Implementation· Post-implementation support | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis· Design of the new system | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Implementation· Post-implementation support | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response elements are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Assignment includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100