Category: Nursing > Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] 2 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Reflect on the quality health indicators that impact the care of diverse ethnic and cultural populations. Select one possible trend (it would be appropriate to discuss the area of focus you are using for your assignments and final project here) based upon the increasingly diverse population in the U…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Reflect on the quality health indicators that impact the care of diverse ethnic and cultural populations. Select one possible trend (it would be appropriate to discuss the area of focus you are using for your assignments and final project here) based upon the increasingly diverse population in the United States.  You may review Healthy People 2000, 2010, and 2020 to understand how health and illness trends have changed over the last 20 years.  Take your selected topic and provide at least three health and illness recommendations to improve the health of the nation by 2030. Include as part of your discussion how Health Care Reform has influenced health care. Based upon your experiences and proposed future strategies, how will you participate in shaping health policy to deliver equitable individual and population resources as a member of a multidisciplinary health care team?

    Support your discussion and opinions with facts, relevant examples from personal nursing practice, and at least two citations from the reading or peer-reviewed professional nursing literature. Remember to use APA Manual (7th ed.) formatting for all discussion posts in-text and reference citations.

    NOTE:

    Must be at least 300 words

    Reference page at the end of the discussion

    NO title page needed

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx – ## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx** MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm** **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx

    – ## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx**

    The PICOT question selected for this discussion is: In adults with mild insomnia (P), does providing a short educational handout on sleep hygiene (I), compared to usual care (C), improve sleep quality (O) within 8 weeks (T)? This question addresses a significant and increasingly recognized public health concern. Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent and have been linked to adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and depression (Lim et al., 2023). Despite its impact, sleep health remains underprioritized in many clinical and community settings.

    The healthcare problem targeted is the limited integration of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia in routine care. Many patients with mild insomnia do not receive structured education on sleep hygiene and may instead be managed with pharmacologic therapies, which can lead to dependency, side effects, and increased healthcare costs. Behavioral and educational approaches, such as sleep hygiene instruction, are strongly supported as first-line strategies for improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Therefore, implementing a simple educational handout represents a practical, evidence-based intervention that can be easily integrated into outpatient practice.

    The impact of this issue extends beyond individual patients. Poor sleep contributes to decreased quality of life, impaired cognitive performance, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare utilization. At the community level, particularly in areas such as Miami-Dade County, addressing sleep health can improve overall population wellness and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. Furthermore, inadequate sleep has been associated with higher risks of chronic disease exacerbation, which may contribute to increased readmissions and long-term healthcare costs (Lim et al., 2023).

    The proposed setting is a primary care or outpatient clinic in Miami-Dade, focusing on adults experiencing mild insomnia. An 8-week timeframe allows for adequate implementation of the intervention and evaluation of measurable improvements in sleep quality. This approach supports a cost-effective, patient-centered, and evidence-based strategy that aligns with current clinical recommendations and promotes sustainable improvements in health outcomes.

    References

    Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., … & Jackson, C. L. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe. The Lancet Public Health, 8(10), e820-e826.

    Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World sleep society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of “behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of sleep medicine clinical practice guidelines”. Sleep medicine, 109, 164-169.

    Top of Form

    For my capstone project, I will use Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory because both theories support patient education, behavioral modification, and evidence-based nursing practice. My PICOT question focuses on adults with mild insomnia and evaluates whether providing a sleep hygiene educational handout improves sleep quality within 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and behavioral changes, these theories provide an appropriate framework for implementation and evaluation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory is especially relevant to my project because it emphasizes the patient’s ability to engage in self-care activities that promote health and well-being. Patients with mild insomnia can benefit from learning strategies such as maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, reducing caffeine intake, limiting electronic device use before bedtime, and creating a healthy sleep environment. In my capstone project, I will incorporate Orem’s theory by educating patients about evidence-based sleep hygiene practices and encouraging them to independently apply these behaviors in their daily lives. The nurse’s role will be to provide education, support, and follow-up to reinforce self-care behaviors and monitor improvements in sleep quality (Tanaka, 2022).

    Additionally, Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the intervention within the outpatient clinical setting. The theory’s three stages—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—will support both patient and organizational change. During the unfreezing stage, patients and healthcare providers will recognize the importance of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia management. During the changing stage, the educational handouts will be distributed, and sleep hygiene teaching will be reinforced during visits. Finally, the refreezing stage will focus on maintaining healthy sleep behaviors and integrating sleep hygiene education into routine patient care practices (Harrison et al., 2021).

    Together, these theories provide a strong framework for promoting patient-centered care, improving sleep outcomes, and supporting sustainable behavioral changes in adults with mild insomnia.

    References

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of healthcare leadership_,
    _13_, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP allows healthcare providers to implement interventions supported by scientific research rather than relying solely on tradition or personal experience. In advanced nursing practice, EBP is essential because it promotes high-quality, safe, cost-effective, and patient-centered care while improving healthcare outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). APRNs play a critical role in identifying clinical problems, evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and assessing outcomes to improve healthcare delivery.

    Through my literature review, I have discovered strong evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions as first-line treatments for mild insomnia. Research consistently demonstrates that sleep hygiene education and behavioral interventions improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms without the risks associated with long-term pharmacologic therapy. Studies emphasize strategies such as maintaining consistent sleep schedules, reducing caffeine intake, minimizing screen exposure before bedtime, and optimizing the sleep environment as effective approaches to improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Additionally, literature indicates that patient education interventions are low-cost, practical, and easily implemented in outpatient and primary care settings, making them highly feasible for my capstone project. Sleep disturbances are also associated with increased risks of chronic disease, anxiety, depression, and decreased quality of life, highlighting the importance of addressing insomnia early through evidence-based interventions (Lim et al., 2023).

    APRNs are heavily involved in EBP within my capstone project because they serve as leaders in implementing and sustaining practice changes. In my project, APRNs will assess patients with mild insomnia, educate them on sleep hygiene practices using evidence-based handouts, and monitor progress over the 8-week period. They will also evaluate patient outcomes by assessing improvements in sleep quality and adjusting interventions when necessary. Furthermore, APRNs advocate for integrating non-pharmacologic insomnia management into routine outpatient care, supporting safer and more sustainable treatment approaches. By applying EBP principles, APRNs can improve patient self-management, reduce unnecessary medication dependence, and enhance long-term health outcomes.

    **References**

    Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice_ (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    The Lancet Public Health Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., et al. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe.
    _The Lancet Public Health, 8_(10), e820–e826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00154-0

    Sleep Medicine Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World Sleep Society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults.
    _Sleep Medicine, 109_, 164–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2023.07.004

    Bottom of Form

    **## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx**

    The PICOT question selected for this discussion is: In adults with mild insomnia (P), does providing a short educational handout on sleep hygiene (I), compared to usual care (C), improve sleep quality (O) within 8 weeks (T)? This question addresses a significant and increasingly recognized public health concern. Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent and have been linked to adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and depression (Lim et al., 2023). Despite its impact, sleep health remains underprioritized in many clinical and community settings.

    The healthcare problem targeted is the limited integration of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia in routine care. Many patients with mild insomnia do not receive structured education on sleep hygiene and may instead be managed with pharmacologic therapies, which can lead to dependency, side effects, and increased healthcare costs. Behavioral and educational approaches, such as sleep hygiene instruction, are strongly supported as first-line strategies for improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Therefore, implementing a simple educational handout represents a practical, evidence-based intervention that can be easily integrated into outpatient practice.

    The impact of this issue extends beyond individual patients. Poor sleep contributes to decreased quality of life, impaired cognitive performance, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare utilization. At the community level, particularly in areas such as Miami-Dade County, addressing sleep health can improve overall population wellness and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. Furthermore, inadequate sleep has been associated with higher risks of chronic disease exacerbation, which may contribute to increased readmissions and long-term healthcare costs (Lim et al., 2023).

    The proposed setting is a primary care or outpatient clinic in Miami-Dade, focusing on adults experiencing mild insomnia. An 8-week timeframe allows for adequate implementation of the intervention and evaluation of measurable improvements in sleep quality. This approach supports a cost-effective, patient-centered, and evidence-based strategy that aligns with current clinical recommendations and promotes sustainable improvements in health outcomes.

    References

    Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., … & Jackson, C. L. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe. The Lancet Public Health, 8(10), e820-e826.

    Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World sleep society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of “behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of sleep medicine clinical practice guidelines”. Sleep medicine, 109, 164-169.

    Top of Form

    For my capstone project, I will use Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory because both theories support patient education, behavioral modification, and evidence-based nursing practice. My PICOT question focuses on adults with mild insomnia and evaluates whether providing a sleep hygiene educational handout improves sleep quality within 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and behavioral changes, these theories provide an appropriate framework for implementation and evaluation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory is especially relevant to my project because it emphasizes the patient’s ability to engage in self-care activities that promote health and well-being. Patients with mild insomnia can benefit from learning strategies such as maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, reducing caffeine intake, limiting electronic device use before bedtime, and creating a healthy sleep environment. In my capstone project, I will incorporate Orem’s theory by educating patients about evidence-based sleep hygiene practices and encouraging them to independently apply these behaviors in their daily lives. The nurse’s role will be to provide education, support, and follow-up to reinforce self-care behaviors and monitor improvements in sleep quality (Tanaka, 2022).

    Additionally, Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the intervention within the outpatient clinical setting. The theory’s three stages—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—will support both patient and organizational change. During the unfreezing stage, patients and healthcare providers will recognize the importance of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia management. During the changing stage, the educational handouts will be distributed, and sleep hygiene teaching will be reinforced during visits. Finally, the refreezing stage will focus on maintaining healthy sleep behaviors and integrating sleep hygiene education into routine patient care practices (Harrison et al., 2021).

    Together, these theories provide a strong framework for promoting patient-centered care, improving sleep outcomes, and supporting sustainable behavioral changes in adults with mild insomnia.

    References

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of healthcare leadership_,
    _13_, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP allows healthcare providers to implement interventions supported by scientific research rather than relying solely on tradition or personal experience. In advanced nursing practice, EBP is essential because it promotes high-quality, safe, cost-effective, and patient-centered care while improving healthcare outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). APRNs play a critical role in identifying clinical problems, evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and assessing outcomes to improve healthcare delivery.

    Through my literature review, I have discovered strong evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions as first-line treatments for mild insomnia. Research consistently demonstrates that sleep hygiene education and behavioral interventions improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms without the risks associated with long-term pharmacologic therapy. Studies emphasize strategies such as maintaining consistent sleep schedules, reducing caffeine intake, minimizing screen exposure before bedtime, and optimizing the sleep environment as effective approaches to improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Additionally, literature indicates that patient education interventions are low-cost, practical, and easily implemented in outpatient and primary care settings, making them highly feasible for my capstone project. Sleep disturbances are also associated with increased risks of chronic disease, anxiety, depression, and decreased quality of life, highlighting the importance of addressing insomnia early through evidence-based interventions (Lim et al., 2023).

    APRNs are heavily involved in EBP within my capstone project because they serve as leaders in implementing and sustaining practice changes. In my project, APRNs will assess patients with mild insomnia, educate them on sleep hygiene practices using evidence-based handouts, and monitor progress over the 8-week period. They will also evaluate patient outcomes by assessing improvements in sleep quality and adjusting interventions when necessary. Furthermore, APRNs advocate for integrating non-pharmacologic insomnia management into routine outpatient care, supporting safer and more sustainable treatment approaches. By applying EBP principles, APRNs can improve patient self-management, reduce unnecessary medication dependence, and enhance long-term health outcomes.

    **References**

    Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice_ (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    The Lancet Public Health Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., et al. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe.
    _The Lancet Public Health, 8_(10), e820–e826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00154-0

    Sleep Medicine Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World Sleep Society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults.
    _Sleep Medicine, 109_, 164–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2023.07.004

    Bottom of Form

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx**

    The PICOT question selected for this discussion is: In adults with mild insomnia (P), does providing a short educational handout on sleep hygiene (I), compared to usual care (C), improve sleep quality (O) within 8 weeks (T)? This question addresses a significant and increasingly recognized public health concern. Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent and have been linked to adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and depression (Lim et al., 2023). Despite its impact, sleep health remains underprioritized in many clinical and community settings.

    The healthcare problem targeted is the limited integration of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia in routine care. Many patients with mild insomnia do not receive structured education on sleep hygiene and may instead be managed with pharmacologic therapies, which can lead to dependency, side effects, and increased healthcare costs. Behavioral and educational approaches, such as sleep hygiene instruction, are strongly supported as first-line strategies for improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Therefore, implementing a simple educational handout represents a practical, evidence-based intervention that can be easily integrated into outpatient practice.

    The impact of this issue extends beyond individual patients. Poor sleep contributes to decreased quality of life, impaired cognitive performance, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare utilization. At the community level, particularly in areas such as Miami-Dade County, addressing sleep health can improve overall population wellness and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. Furthermore, inadequate sleep has been associated with higher risks of chronic disease exacerbation, which may contribute to increased readmissions and long-term healthcare costs (Lim et al., 2023).

    The proposed setting is a primary care or outpatient clinic in Miami-Dade, focusing on adults experiencing mild insomnia. An 8-week timeframe allows for adequate implementation of the intervention and evaluation of measurable improvements in sleep quality. This approach supports a cost-effective, patient-centered, and evidence-based strategy that aligns with current clinical recommendations and promotes sustainable improvements in health outcomes.

    References

    Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., … & Jackson, C. L. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe. The Lancet Public Health, 8(10), e820-e826.

    Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World sleep society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of “behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of sleep medicine clinical practice guidelines”. Sleep medicine, 109, 164-169.

    Top of Form

    For my capstone project, I will use Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory because both theories support patient education, behavioral modification, and evidence-based nursing practice. My PICOT question focuses on adults with mild insomnia and evaluates whether providing a sleep hygiene educational handout improves sleep quality within 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and behavioral changes, these theories provide an appropriate framework for implementation and evaluation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory is especially relevant to my project because it emphasizes the patient’s ability to engage in self-care activities that promote health and well-being. Patients with mild insomnia can benefit from learning strategies such as maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, reducing caffeine intake, limiting electronic device use before bedtime, and creating a healthy sleep environment. In my capstone project, I will incorporate Orem’s theory by educating patients about evidence-based sleep hygiene practices and encouraging them to independently apply these behaviors in their daily lives. The nurse’s role will be to provide education, support, and follow-up to reinforce self-care behaviors and monitor improvements in sleep quality (Tanaka, 2022).

    Additionally, Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the intervention within the outpatient clinical setting. The theory’s three stages—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—will support both patient and organizational change. During the unfreezing stage, patients and healthcare providers will recognize the importance of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia management. During the changing stage, the educational handouts will be distributed, and sleep hygiene teaching will be reinforced during visits. Finally, the refreezing stage will focus on maintaining healthy sleep behaviors and integrating sleep hygiene education into routine patient care practices (Harrison et al., 2021).

    Together, these theories provide a strong framework for promoting patient-centered care, improving sleep outcomes, and supporting sustainable behavioral changes in adults with mild insomnia.

    References

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of healthcare leadership_,
    _13_, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP allows healthcare providers to implement interventions supported by scientific research rather than relying solely on tradition or personal experience. In advanced nursing practice, EBP is essential because it promotes high-quality, safe, cost-effective, and patient-centered care while improving healthcare outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). APRNs play a critical role in identifying clinical problems, evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and assessing outcomes to improve healthcare delivery.

    Through my literature review, I have discovered strong evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions as first-line treatments for mild insomnia. Research consistently demonstrates that sleep hygiene education and behavioral interventions improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms without the risks associated with long-term pharmacologic therapy. Studies emphasize strategies such as maintaining consistent sleep schedules, reducing caffeine intake, minimizing screen exposure before bedtime, and optimizing the sleep environment as effective approaches to improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Additionally, literature indicates that patient education interventions are low-cost, practical, and easily implemented in outpatient and primary care settings, making them highly feasible for my capstone project. Sleep disturbances are also associated with increased risks of chronic disease, anxiety, depression, and decreased quality of life, highlighting the importance of addressing insomnia early through evidence-based interventions (Lim et al., 2023).

    APRNs are heavily involved in EBP within my capstone project because they serve as leaders in implementing and sustaining practice changes. In my project, APRNs will assess patients with mild insomnia, educate them on sleep hygiene practices using evidence-based handouts, and monitor progress over the 8-week period. They will also evaluate patient outcomes by assessing improvements in sleep quality and adjusting interventions when necessary. Furthermore, APRNs advocate for integrating non-pharmacologic insomnia management into routine outpatient care, supporting safer and more sustainable treatment approaches. By applying EBP principles, APRNs can improve patient self-management, reduce unnecessary medication dependence, and enhance long-term health outcomes.

    **References**

    Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice_ (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    The Lancet Public Health Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., et al. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe.
    _The Lancet Public Health, 8_(10), e820–e826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00154-0

    Sleep Medicine Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World Sleep Society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults.
    _Sleep Medicine, 109_, 164–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2023.07.004

    Bottom of Form

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## ThePICOTquestionselectedforthisdiscussionis.docx**

    The PICOT question selected for this discussion is: In adults with mild insomnia (P), does providing a short educational handout on sleep hygiene (I), compared to usual care (C), improve sleep quality (O) within 8 weeks (T)? This question addresses a significant and increasingly recognized public health concern. Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent and have been linked to adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and depression (Lim et al., 2023). Despite its impact, sleep health remains underprioritized in many clinical and community settings.

    The healthcare problem targeted is the limited integration of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia in routine care. Many patients with mild insomnia do not receive structured education on sleep hygiene and may instead be managed with pharmacologic therapies, which can lead to dependency, side effects, and increased healthcare costs. Behavioral and educational approaches, such as sleep hygiene instruction, are strongly supported as first-line strategies for improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Therefore, implementing a simple educational handout represents a practical, evidence-based intervention that can be easily integrated into outpatient practice.

    The impact of this issue extends beyond individual patients. Poor sleep contributes to decreased quality of life, impaired cognitive performance, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare utilization. At the community level, particularly in areas such as Miami-Dade County, addressing sleep health can improve overall population wellness and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. Furthermore, inadequate sleep has been associated with higher risks of chronic disease exacerbation, which may contribute to increased readmissions and long-term healthcare costs (Lim et al., 2023).

    The proposed setting is a primary care or outpatient clinic in Miami-Dade, focusing on adults experiencing mild insomnia. An 8-week timeframe allows for adequate implementation of the intervention and evaluation of measurable improvements in sleep quality. This approach supports a cost-effective, patient-centered, and evidence-based strategy that aligns with current clinical recommendations and promotes sustainable improvements in health outcomes.

    References

    Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., … & Jackson, C. L. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe. The Lancet Public Health, 8(10), e820-e826.

    Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World sleep society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of “behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of sleep medicine clinical practice guidelines”. Sleep medicine, 109, 164-169.

    Top of Form

    For my capstone project, I will use Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory because both theories support patient education, behavioral modification, and evidence-based nursing practice. My PICOT question focuses on adults with mild insomnia and evaluates whether providing a sleep hygiene educational handout improves sleep quality within 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and behavioral changes, these theories provide an appropriate framework for implementation and evaluation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory is especially relevant to my project because it emphasizes the patient’s ability to engage in self-care activities that promote health and well-being. Patients with mild insomnia can benefit from learning strategies such as maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, reducing caffeine intake, limiting electronic device use before bedtime, and creating a healthy sleep environment. In my capstone project, I will incorporate Orem’s theory by educating patients about evidence-based sleep hygiene practices and encouraging them to independently apply these behaviors in their daily lives. The nurse’s role will be to provide education, support, and follow-up to reinforce self-care behaviors and monitor improvements in sleep quality (Tanaka, 2022).

    Additionally, Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the intervention within the outpatient clinical setting. The theory’s three stages—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—will support both patient and organizational change. During the unfreezing stage, patients and healthcare providers will recognize the importance of non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia management. During the changing stage, the educational handouts will be distributed, and sleep hygiene teaching will be reinforced during visits. Finally, the refreezing stage will focus on maintaining healthy sleep behaviors and integrating sleep hygiene education into routine patient care practices (Harrison et al., 2021).

    Together, these theories provide a strong framework for promoting patient-centered care, improving sleep outcomes, and supporting sustainable behavioral changes in adults with mild insomnia.

    References

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of healthcare leadership_,
    _13_, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP allows healthcare providers to implement interventions supported by scientific research rather than relying solely on tradition or personal experience. In advanced nursing practice, EBP is essential because it promotes high-quality, safe, cost-effective, and patient-centered care while improving healthcare outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). APRNs play a critical role in identifying clinical problems, evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and assessing outcomes to improve healthcare delivery.

    Through my literature review, I have discovered strong evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions as first-line treatments for mild insomnia. Research consistently demonstrates that sleep hygiene education and behavioral interventions improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms without the risks associated with long-term pharmacologic therapy. Studies emphasize strategies such as maintaining consistent sleep schedules, reducing caffeine intake, minimizing screen exposure before bedtime, and optimizing the sleep environment as effective approaches to improving sleep outcomes (Morin et al., 2023). Additionally, literature indicates that patient education interventions are low-cost, practical, and easily implemented in outpatient and primary care settings, making them highly feasible for my capstone project. Sleep disturbances are also associated with increased risks of chronic disease, anxiety, depression, and decreased quality of life, highlighting the importance of addressing insomnia early through evidence-based interventions (Lim et al., 2023).

    APRNs are heavily involved in EBP within my capstone project because they serve as leaders in implementing and sustaining practice changes. In my project, APRNs will assess patients with mild insomnia, educate them on sleep hygiene practices using evidence-based handouts, and monitor progress over the 8-week period. They will also evaluate patient outcomes by assessing improvements in sleep quality and adjusting interventions when necessary. Furthermore, APRNs advocate for integrating non-pharmacologic insomnia management into routine outpatient care, supporting safer and more sustainable treatment approaches. By applying EBP principles, APRNs can improve patient self-management, reduce unnecessary medication dependence, and enhance long-term health outcomes.

    **References**

    Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice_ (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    The Lancet Public Health Lim, D. C., Najafi, A., Afifi, L., Bassetti, C. L., Buysse, D. J., Han, F., et al. (2023). The need to promote sleep health in public health agendas across the globe.
    _The Lancet Public Health, 8_(10), e820–e826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00154-0

    Sleep Medicine Morin, C. M., Bei, B., Bjorvatn, B., Poyares, D., Spiegelhalder, K., & Wing, Y. K. (2023). World Sleep Society international sleep medicine guidelines position statement endorsement of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults.
    _Sleep Medicine, 109_, 164–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2023.07.004

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx – ## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx** MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm** **The PICOT will be a he…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx

    – ## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx**

    The revised PICOT question is now clearly aligned with a defined clinical setting: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)?

    The healthcare problem addressed in this PICOT is the lack of structured and consistent lifestyle counseling in primary care settings. Many patients do not receive comprehensive guidance on weight management, which contributes to poor health outcomes and disease progression. Lifestyle modification education, which integrates nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral strategies, is an evidence-based approach that can effectively support weight reduction. According to Alqahtani (2025), lifestyle counseling in primary care has demonstrated effectiveness in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes when delivered in a structured and patient-centered manner. These interventions are practical, low-cost, and can be implemented without complex resources, making them ideal for routine clinical practice.

    The impact of obesity extends beyond individual health to the broader community and healthcare system. Increased prevalence of obesity contributes to higher healthcare costs due to chronic disease management, hospital admissions, and preventable complications. Additionally, obesity negatively affects patients’ physical functioning and psychological well-being, reducing overall quality of life (CDC, 2023). By implementing standardized lifestyle modification education, primary care providers can help reduce these burdens, improve patient outcomes, and prevent costly complications.

    The setting for this proposed intervention is primary care clinics, where patients frequently seek preventive and chronic care services. The target population includes adults who are overweight or obese, a group at high risk for developing long-term health complications. Primary care is an optimal setting for this intervention because it allows for early identification, continuous monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors. Overall, this PICOT question addresses a critical healthcare issue using a simple, evidence-based strategy that can improve patient outcomes without requiring complex implementation

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and implementation of this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, behavioral modification, and sustainable healthcare improvement. These frameworks are especially appropriate for addressing obesity management through structured lifestyle modification education in primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of patient participation in maintaining and improving health through self-care behaviors. According to Dorothea Orem, nursing interventions should focus on empowering patients to independently manage their health needs when possible. This theory is highly relevant to obesity management because long-term weight reduction depends on patients consistently engaging in healthy eating, physical activity, and behavioral changes. In this Capstone project, Orem’s theory will be incorporated through structured patient education focused on nutrition, exercise, portion control, and self-monitoring strategies. Nurses will serve as educators and supporters who encourage patients to develop self-care abilities and maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Isik and Fredland (2023) emphasized that Orem’s theory effectively improves self-care behaviors through education and supportive nursing interventions, making it an appropriate framework for promoting patient accountability and long-term lifestyle modification.

    Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will also be used to support the implementation of the intervention within the clinical setting. Lewin’s theory consists of three stages: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, healthcare providers and patients will recognize obesity as a serious health concern requiring intervention. Educational discussions regarding obesity-related complications and the benefits of lifestyle changes will help motivate readiness for change. In the changing stage, the structured lifestyle modification education program will be implemented through counseling sessions, educational materials, and ongoing patient support. Patients will begin practicing healthier behaviors while providers reinforce positive progress. Finally, during the refreezing stage, healthy behaviors and standardized educational practices will become integrated into routine patient care and patients’ daily lifestyles. Amina et al. (2022) demonstrated that Lewin’s Change Theory can successfully improve healthcare practices and patient outcomes by guiding systematic implementation and sustaining change over time.

    The integration of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Lewin’s Change Theory provides a strong theoretical foundation for this Capstone project. Together, these theories promote patient empowerment, evidence-based education, behavioral change, and sustainability, all of which are essential for improving body weight and BMI outcomes among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP helps healthcare providers implement interventions that are supported by research rather than relying solely on tradition or experience. In nursing and advanced practice, EBP is essential because it promotes safe, effective, and patient-centered care while reducing unnecessary healthcare costs and complications (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Through EBP, healthcare professionals can evaluate current research and apply interventions that have demonstrated measurable effectiveness in clinical practice.

    Based on the current review of literature for the revised PICOT question, structured lifestyle modification education has consistently demonstrated positive effects on weight reduction and BMI improvement among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings. Research indicates that interventions including nutrition counseling, physical activity guidance, behavioral support, and individualized education improve weight management outcomes when delivered consistently and in a patient-centered manner. For example, lifestyle counseling in primary care settings has been associated with improved metabolic outcomes and modest but clinically meaningful weight loss among adults with obesity (Alqahtani, 2025). Additionally, literature supports the importance of continuous monitoring and reinforcement of behavioral changes to sustain long-term improvements in health outcomes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in EBP implementation within this Capstone project. APRNs are responsible for identifying healthcare problems, evaluating current evidence, and translating research findings into clinical interventions. In this obesity-focused project, APRNs will implement structured lifestyle modification education, assess patients’ readiness for change, provide counseling on nutrition and physical activity, and monitor patient progress over the 8–12-week period. Guided by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, APRNs will empower patients to develop self-management skills, while Lewin’s Change Theory will assist APRNs in facilitating sustainable behavioral changes within the clinical setting. APRNs also contribute by evaluating outcomes and ensuring that evidence-based interventions become part of routine primary care practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

    **## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx**

    The revised PICOT question is now clearly aligned with a defined clinical setting: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)?

    The healthcare problem addressed in this PICOT is the lack of structured and consistent lifestyle counseling in primary care settings. Many patients do not receive comprehensive guidance on weight management, which contributes to poor health outcomes and disease progression. Lifestyle modification education, which integrates nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral strategies, is an evidence-based approach that can effectively support weight reduction. According to Alqahtani (2025), lifestyle counseling in primary care has demonstrated effectiveness in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes when delivered in a structured and patient-centered manner. These interventions are practical, low-cost, and can be implemented without complex resources, making them ideal for routine clinical practice.

    The impact of obesity extends beyond individual health to the broader community and healthcare system. Increased prevalence of obesity contributes to higher healthcare costs due to chronic disease management, hospital admissions, and preventable complications. Additionally, obesity negatively affects patients’ physical functioning and psychological well-being, reducing overall quality of life (CDC, 2023). By implementing standardized lifestyle modification education, primary care providers can help reduce these burdens, improve patient outcomes, and prevent costly complications.

    The setting for this proposed intervention is primary care clinics, where patients frequently seek preventive and chronic care services. The target population includes adults who are overweight or obese, a group at high risk for developing long-term health complications. Primary care is an optimal setting for this intervention because it allows for early identification, continuous monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors. Overall, this PICOT question addresses a critical healthcare issue using a simple, evidence-based strategy that can improve patient outcomes without requiring complex implementation

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and implementation of this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, behavioral modification, and sustainable healthcare improvement. These frameworks are especially appropriate for addressing obesity management through structured lifestyle modification education in primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of patient participation in maintaining and improving health through self-care behaviors. According to Dorothea Orem, nursing interventions should focus on empowering patients to independently manage their health needs when possible. This theory is highly relevant to obesity management because long-term weight reduction depends on patients consistently engaging in healthy eating, physical activity, and behavioral changes. In this Capstone project, Orem’s theory will be incorporated through structured patient education focused on nutrition, exercise, portion control, and self-monitoring strategies. Nurses will serve as educators and supporters who encourage patients to develop self-care abilities and maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Isik and Fredland (2023) emphasized that Orem’s theory effectively improves self-care behaviors through education and supportive nursing interventions, making it an appropriate framework for promoting patient accountability and long-term lifestyle modification.

    Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will also be used to support the implementation of the intervention within the clinical setting. Lewin’s theory consists of three stages: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, healthcare providers and patients will recognize obesity as a serious health concern requiring intervention. Educational discussions regarding obesity-related complications and the benefits of lifestyle changes will help motivate readiness for change. In the changing stage, the structured lifestyle modification education program will be implemented through counseling sessions, educational materials, and ongoing patient support. Patients will begin practicing healthier behaviors while providers reinforce positive progress. Finally, during the refreezing stage, healthy behaviors and standardized educational practices will become integrated into routine patient care and patients’ daily lifestyles. Amina et al. (2022) demonstrated that Lewin’s Change Theory can successfully improve healthcare practices and patient outcomes by guiding systematic implementation and sustaining change over time.

    The integration of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Lewin’s Change Theory provides a strong theoretical foundation for this Capstone project. Together, these theories promote patient empowerment, evidence-based education, behavioral change, and sustainability, all of which are essential for improving body weight and BMI outcomes among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP helps healthcare providers implement interventions that are supported by research rather than relying solely on tradition or experience. In nursing and advanced practice, EBP is essential because it promotes safe, effective, and patient-centered care while reducing unnecessary healthcare costs and complications (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Through EBP, healthcare professionals can evaluate current research and apply interventions that have demonstrated measurable effectiveness in clinical practice.

    Based on the current review of literature for the revised PICOT question, structured lifestyle modification education has consistently demonstrated positive effects on weight reduction and BMI improvement among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings. Research indicates that interventions including nutrition counseling, physical activity guidance, behavioral support, and individualized education improve weight management outcomes when delivered consistently and in a patient-centered manner. For example, lifestyle counseling in primary care settings has been associated with improved metabolic outcomes and modest but clinically meaningful weight loss among adults with obesity (Alqahtani, 2025). Additionally, literature supports the importance of continuous monitoring and reinforcement of behavioral changes to sustain long-term improvements in health outcomes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in EBP implementation within this Capstone project. APRNs are responsible for identifying healthcare problems, evaluating current evidence, and translating research findings into clinical interventions. In this obesity-focused project, APRNs will implement structured lifestyle modification education, assess patients’ readiness for change, provide counseling on nutrition and physical activity, and monitor patient progress over the 8–12-week period. Guided by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, APRNs will empower patients to develop self-management skills, while Lewin’s Change Theory will assist APRNs in facilitating sustainable behavioral changes within the clinical setting. APRNs also contribute by evaluating outcomes and ensuring that evidence-based interventions become part of routine primary care practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx**

    The revised PICOT question is now clearly aligned with a defined clinical setting: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)?

    The healthcare problem addressed in this PICOT is the lack of structured and consistent lifestyle counseling in primary care settings. Many patients do not receive comprehensive guidance on weight management, which contributes to poor health outcomes and disease progression. Lifestyle modification education, which integrates nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral strategies, is an evidence-based approach that can effectively support weight reduction. According to Alqahtani (2025), lifestyle counseling in primary care has demonstrated effectiveness in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes when delivered in a structured and patient-centered manner. These interventions are practical, low-cost, and can be implemented without complex resources, making them ideal for routine clinical practice.

    The impact of obesity extends beyond individual health to the broader community and healthcare system. Increased prevalence of obesity contributes to higher healthcare costs due to chronic disease management, hospital admissions, and preventable complications. Additionally, obesity negatively affects patients’ physical functioning and psychological well-being, reducing overall quality of life (CDC, 2023). By implementing standardized lifestyle modification education, primary care providers can help reduce these burdens, improve patient outcomes, and prevent costly complications.

    The setting for this proposed intervention is primary care clinics, where patients frequently seek preventive and chronic care services. The target population includes adults who are overweight or obese, a group at high risk for developing long-term health complications. Primary care is an optimal setting for this intervention because it allows for early identification, continuous monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors. Overall, this PICOT question addresses a critical healthcare issue using a simple, evidence-based strategy that can improve patient outcomes without requiring complex implementation

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and implementation of this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, behavioral modification, and sustainable healthcare improvement. These frameworks are especially appropriate for addressing obesity management through structured lifestyle modification education in primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of patient participation in maintaining and improving health through self-care behaviors. According to Dorothea Orem, nursing interventions should focus on empowering patients to independently manage their health needs when possible. This theory is highly relevant to obesity management because long-term weight reduction depends on patients consistently engaging in healthy eating, physical activity, and behavioral changes. In this Capstone project, Orem’s theory will be incorporated through structured patient education focused on nutrition, exercise, portion control, and self-monitoring strategies. Nurses will serve as educators and supporters who encourage patients to develop self-care abilities and maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Isik and Fredland (2023) emphasized that Orem’s theory effectively improves self-care behaviors through education and supportive nursing interventions, making it an appropriate framework for promoting patient accountability and long-term lifestyle modification.

    Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will also be used to support the implementation of the intervention within the clinical setting. Lewin’s theory consists of three stages: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, healthcare providers and patients will recognize obesity as a serious health concern requiring intervention. Educational discussions regarding obesity-related complications and the benefits of lifestyle changes will help motivate readiness for change. In the changing stage, the structured lifestyle modification education program will be implemented through counseling sessions, educational materials, and ongoing patient support. Patients will begin practicing healthier behaviors while providers reinforce positive progress. Finally, during the refreezing stage, healthy behaviors and standardized educational practices will become integrated into routine patient care and patients’ daily lifestyles. Amina et al. (2022) demonstrated that Lewin’s Change Theory can successfully improve healthcare practices and patient outcomes by guiding systematic implementation and sustaining change over time.

    The integration of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Lewin’s Change Theory provides a strong theoretical foundation for this Capstone project. Together, these theories promote patient empowerment, evidence-based education, behavioral change, and sustainability, all of which are essential for improving body weight and BMI outcomes among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP helps healthcare providers implement interventions that are supported by research rather than relying solely on tradition or experience. In nursing and advanced practice, EBP is essential because it promotes safe, effective, and patient-centered care while reducing unnecessary healthcare costs and complications (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Through EBP, healthcare professionals can evaluate current research and apply interventions that have demonstrated measurable effectiveness in clinical practice.

    Based on the current review of literature for the revised PICOT question, structured lifestyle modification education has consistently demonstrated positive effects on weight reduction and BMI improvement among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings. Research indicates that interventions including nutrition counseling, physical activity guidance, behavioral support, and individualized education improve weight management outcomes when delivered consistently and in a patient-centered manner. For example, lifestyle counseling in primary care settings has been associated with improved metabolic outcomes and modest but clinically meaningful weight loss among adults with obesity (Alqahtani, 2025). Additionally, literature supports the importance of continuous monitoring and reinforcement of behavioral changes to sustain long-term improvements in health outcomes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in EBP implementation within this Capstone project. APRNs are responsible for identifying healthcare problems, evaluating current evidence, and translating research findings into clinical interventions. In this obesity-focused project, APRNs will implement structured lifestyle modification education, assess patients’ readiness for change, provide counseling on nutrition and physical activity, and monitor patient progress over the 8–12-week period. Guided by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, APRNs will empower patients to develop self-management skills, while Lewin’s Change Theory will assist APRNs in facilitating sustainable behavioral changes within the clinical setting. APRNs also contribute by evaluating outcomes and ensuring that evidence-based interventions become part of routine primary care practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## TherevisedPICOTquestionisnowclearlyalignedwithadefinedclinicalsetting.docx**

    The revised PICOT question is now clearly aligned with a defined clinical setting: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)?

    The healthcare problem addressed in this PICOT is the lack of structured and consistent lifestyle counseling in primary care settings. Many patients do not receive comprehensive guidance on weight management, which contributes to poor health outcomes and disease progression. Lifestyle modification education, which integrates nutrition, physical activity, and behavioral strategies, is an evidence-based approach that can effectively support weight reduction. According to Alqahtani (2025), lifestyle counseling in primary care has demonstrated effectiveness in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes when delivered in a structured and patient-centered manner. These interventions are practical, low-cost, and can be implemented without complex resources, making them ideal for routine clinical practice.

    The impact of obesity extends beyond individual health to the broader community and healthcare system. Increased prevalence of obesity contributes to higher healthcare costs due to chronic disease management, hospital admissions, and preventable complications. Additionally, obesity negatively affects patients’ physical functioning and psychological well-being, reducing overall quality of life (CDC, 2023). By implementing standardized lifestyle modification education, primary care providers can help reduce these burdens, improve patient outcomes, and prevent costly complications.

    The setting for this proposed intervention is primary care clinics, where patients frequently seek preventive and chronic care services. The target population includes adults who are overweight or obese, a group at high risk for developing long-term health complications. Primary care is an optimal setting for this intervention because it allows for early identification, continuous monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors. Overall, this PICOT question addresses a critical healthcare issue using a simple, evidence-based strategy that can improve patient outcomes without requiring complex implementation

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and implementation of this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, behavioral modification, and sustainable healthcare improvement. These frameworks are especially appropriate for addressing obesity management through structured lifestyle modification education in primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of patient participation in maintaining and improving health through self-care behaviors. According to Dorothea Orem, nursing interventions should focus on empowering patients to independently manage their health needs when possible. This theory is highly relevant to obesity management because long-term weight reduction depends on patients consistently engaging in healthy eating, physical activity, and behavioral changes. In this Capstone project, Orem’s theory will be incorporated through structured patient education focused on nutrition, exercise, portion control, and self-monitoring strategies. Nurses will serve as educators and supporters who encourage patients to develop self-care abilities and maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Isik and Fredland (2023) emphasized that Orem’s theory effectively improves self-care behaviors through education and supportive nursing interventions, making it an appropriate framework for promoting patient accountability and long-term lifestyle modification.

    Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory will also be used to support the implementation of the intervention within the clinical setting. Lewin’s theory consists of three stages: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, healthcare providers and patients will recognize obesity as a serious health concern requiring intervention. Educational discussions regarding obesity-related complications and the benefits of lifestyle changes will help motivate readiness for change. In the changing stage, the structured lifestyle modification education program will be implemented through counseling sessions, educational materials, and ongoing patient support. Patients will begin practicing healthier behaviors while providers reinforce positive progress. Finally, during the refreezing stage, healthy behaviors and standardized educational practices will become integrated into routine patient care and patients’ daily lifestyles. Amina et al. (2022) demonstrated that Lewin’s Change Theory can successfully improve healthcare practices and patient outcomes by guiding systematic implementation and sustaining change over time.

    The integration of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and Lewin’s Change Theory provides a strong theoretical foundation for this Capstone project. Together, these theories promote patient empowerment, evidence-based education, behavioral change, and sustainability, all of which are essential for improving body weight and BMI outcomes among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best available scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide healthcare decisions and improve patient outcomes. EBP helps healthcare providers implement interventions that are supported by research rather than relying solely on tradition or experience. In nursing and advanced practice, EBP is essential because it promotes safe, effective, and patient-centered care while reducing unnecessary healthcare costs and complications (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Through EBP, healthcare professionals can evaluate current research and apply interventions that have demonstrated measurable effectiveness in clinical practice.

    Based on the current review of literature for the revised PICOT question, structured lifestyle modification education has consistently demonstrated positive effects on weight reduction and BMI improvement among overweight and obese adults in primary care settings. Research indicates that interventions including nutrition counseling, physical activity guidance, behavioral support, and individualized education improve weight management outcomes when delivered consistently and in a patient-centered manner. For example, lifestyle counseling in primary care settings has been associated with improved metabolic outcomes and modest but clinically meaningful weight loss among adults with obesity (Alqahtani, 2025). Additionally, literature supports the importance of continuous monitoring and reinforcement of behavioral changes to sustain long-term improvements in health outcomes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in EBP implementation within this Capstone project. APRNs are responsible for identifying healthcare problems, evaluating current evidence, and translating research findings into clinical interventions. In this obesity-focused project, APRNs will implement structured lifestyle modification education, assess patients’ readiness for change, provide counseling on nutrition and physical activity, and monitor patient progress over the 8–12-week period. Guided by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, APRNs will empower patients to develop self-management skills, while Lewin’s Change Theory will assist APRNs in facilitating sustainable behavioral changes within the clinical setting. APRNs also contribute by evaluating outcomes and ensuring that evidence-based interventions become part of routine primary care practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## WritingAssigment3.docx – Outlinetemplate.jpg **## WritingAssigment3.docx** Decision Making-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper** **Here I will be approving your TOPIC a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## WritingAssigment3.docx

    – Outlinetemplate.jpg

    **## WritingAssigment3.docx**

    Decision Making-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **Nursing Issues Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **Professional Practice, Safety, and Workforce Issues**

    1. Workplace violence and incivility in healthcare

    2. Horizontal and vertical bullying in nursing

    3. Scopeofpractice barriers for advanced practice nurses

    4. Interprofessional collaboration and communication failures

    5. Medication administration safety and error prevention

    6. Patient handoff and care transition communication

    7. Alarm fatigue and technology overload

    8. Electronic health record (EHR) usability and documentation burden

    9. Clinical decision support tools and nurse autonomy

    10. Delegation and supervision of unlicensed assistive personnel

    11. Shared governance and nurse participation in decisionmaking

    **Equity, Ethics, and PatientCentered Care**

    1. Cultural competence and care for diverse populations

    2. Health equity and structural racism in nursing care

    3. Language barriers and access to interpreter services

    4. Endoflife decisionmaking and goalsofcare communication

    5. Ethical dilemmas in lifesustaining treatment and medical futility

    6. Informed consent and patient comprehension in complex care

    7. Stigma in mental health care delivery

    8. LGBTQ+ affirming care and nursing practice gaps

    **Clinical Quality & Safety**

    1. Infection prevention and control (CLABSI, CAUTI, HAPI)

    2. Falls prevention and safe mobility practices

    3. Pressure injury prevention and skin integrity management

    4. Pediatric medication safety and weightbased dosing

    5. Maternal morbidity and mortality disparities

    6. Care coordination for patients with complex chronic conditions

    7. Readmission reduction and discharge planning quality

    **Education, Leadership, and Workforce Development**

    1. Clinical preceptorship quality and support for new graduates

    2. Transitiontopractice programs and nurse residency models

    3. Mentorship and leadership development in nursing

    4. Professional identity formation and role strain

    5. Nurse involvement in policy advocacy and health legislation

    6. Leadership preparedness for crisis and emergency response

    **Technology, Innovation, and Emerging Trends**

    1. Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in nursing practice

    2. Nursing roles in genomic and precision health care

    3. Technologydriven disparities in patient access and outcomes

    **Public Health, Community Health, and Systems Issues**

    1. Rural health access and nursing practice challenges

    2. Disaster preparedness and emergency response readiness

    3. Climate change and its impact on nursing and patient care

    4. Substance use disorder among nurses and returntowork policies

    5. Pain management and safe opioid stewardship

    6. Social determinants of health and nursing interventions

    7. Housing instability and its impact on patient outcomes

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Outlinetemplate.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlinetemplate-jpg-10549761)

    **Outlinetemplate.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlinetemplate-jpg-10549761)

    **## WritingAssigment3.docx**

    Decision Making-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **Nursing Issues Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **Professional Practice, Safety, and Workforce Issues**

    1. Workplace violence and incivility in healthcare

    2. Horizontal and vertical bullying in nursing

    3. Scopeofpractice barriers for advanced practice nurses

    4. Interprofessional collaboration and communication failures

    5. Medication administration safety and error prevention

    6. Patient handoff and care transition communication

    7. Alarm fatigue and technology overload

    8. Electronic health record (EHR) usability and documentation burden

    9. Clinical decision support tools and nurse autonomy

    10. Delegation and supervision of unlicensed assistive personnel

    11. Shared governance and nurse participation in decisionmaking

    **Equity, Ethics, and PatientCentered Care**

    1. Cultural competence and care for diverse populations

    2. Health equity and structural racism in nursing care

    3. Language barriers and access to interpreter services

    4. Endoflife decisionmaking and goalsofcare communication

    5. Ethical dilemmas in lifesustaining treatment and medical futility

    6. Informed consent and patient comprehension in complex care

    7. Stigma in mental health care delivery

    8. LGBTQ+ affirming care and nursing practice gaps

    **Clinical Quality & Safety**

    1. Infection prevention and control (CLABSI, CAUTI, HAPI)

    2. Falls prevention and safe mobility practices

    3. Pressure injury prevention and skin integrity management

    4. Pediatric medication safety and weightbased dosing

    5. Maternal morbidity and mortality disparities

    6. Care coordination for patients with complex chronic conditions

    7. Readmission reduction and discharge planning quality

    **Education, Leadership, and Workforce Development**

    1. Clinical preceptorship quality and support for new graduates

    2. Transitiontopractice programs and nurse residency models

    3. Mentorship and leadership development in nursing

    4. Professional identity formation and role strain

    5. Nurse involvement in policy advocacy and health legislation

    6. Leadership preparedness for crisis and emergency response

    **Technology, Innovation, and Emerging Trends**

    1. Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in nursing practice

    2. Nursing roles in genomic and precision health care

    3. Technologydriven disparities in patient access and outcomes

    **Public Health, Community Health, and Systems Issues**

    1. Rural health access and nursing practice challenges

    2. Disaster preparedness and emergency response readiness

    3. Climate change and its impact on nursing and patient care

    4. Substance use disorder among nurses and returntowork policies

    5. Pain management and safe opioid stewardship

    6. Social determinants of health and nursing interventions

    7. Housing instability and its impact on patient outcomes

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Outlinetemplate.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlinetemplate-jpg-10549761)

    **## WritingAssigment3.docx**

    Decision Making-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **Nursing Issues Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **Professional Practice, Safety, and Workforce Issues**

    1. Workplace violence and incivility in healthcare

    2. Horizontal and vertical bullying in nursing

    3. Scopeofpractice barriers for advanced practice nurses

    4. Interprofessional collaboration and communication failures

    5. Medication administration safety and error prevention

    6. Patient handoff and care transition communication

    7. Alarm fatigue and technology overload

    8. Electronic health record (EHR) usability and documentation burden

    9. Clinical decision support tools and nurse autonomy

    10. Delegation and supervision of unlicensed assistive personnel

    11. Shared governance and nurse participation in decisionmaking

    **Equity, Ethics, and PatientCentered Care**

    1. Cultural competence and care for diverse populations

    2. Health equity and structural racism in nursing care

    3. Language barriers and access to interpreter services

    4. Endoflife decisionmaking and goalsofcare communication

    5. Ethical dilemmas in lifesustaining treatment and medical futility

    6. Informed consent and patient comprehension in complex care

    7. Stigma in mental health care delivery

    8. LGBTQ+ affirming care and nursing practice gaps

    **Clinical Quality & Safety**

    1. Infection prevention and control (CLABSI, CAUTI, HAPI)

    2. Falls prevention and safe mobility practices

    3. Pressure injury prevention and skin integrity management

    4. Pediatric medication safety and weightbased dosing

    5. Maternal morbidity and mortality disparities

    6. Care coordination for patients with complex chronic conditions

    7. Readmission reduction and discharge planning quality

    **Education, Leadership, and Workforce Development**

    1. Clinical preceptorship quality and support for new graduates

    2. Transitiontopractice programs and nurse residency models

    3. Mentorship and leadership development in nursing

    4. Professional identity formation and role strain

    5. Nurse involvement in policy advocacy and health legislation

    6. Leadership preparedness for crisis and emergency response

    **Technology, Innovation, and Emerging Trends**

    1. Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in nursing practice

    2. Nursing roles in genomic and precision health care

    3. Technologydriven disparities in patient access and outcomes

    **Public Health, Community Health, and Systems Issues**

    1. Rural health access and nursing practice challenges

    2. Disaster preparedness and emergency response readiness

    3. Climate change and its impact on nursing and patient care

    4. Substance use disorder among nurses and returntowork policies

    5. Pain management and safe opioid stewardship

    6. Social determinants of health and nursing interventions

    7. Housing instability and its impact on patient outcomes

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Outlinetemplate.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlinetemplate-jpg-10549761)

  • [Solved] 509 reflection week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    How would the management plan change for the Week 3 virtual patient if the patient were uninsured? Include the following components: 1. Type150-300 words in a Microsoft Word document 2. demonstrate clinical judgment appropriate to the virtual patient scenario 3. provide rationales for each intervent…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    How would the management plan change for the Week 3 virtual patient if the patient were uninsured? Include the following components:

    1. Type150-300 words in a Microsoft Word document
    2. demonstrate clinical judgment appropriate to the virtual patient scenario
    3. provide rationales for each intervention and cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations
    4. communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

    (add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the reflection post)

    Use current APA format for citations and references in management plan and reflection and is free of errors.

    Please provide AI and similarity report

    – [\
    \
    NR509_W3_i-Human_Assignment_Reflection_Worksheet.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nr509-w3-i-human-assignment-reflection-worksheet-docx "NR509_W3_i-Human_Assignment_Reflection_Worksheet.docx")
    – [\
    \
    iHumanweek3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ihumanweek3-pdf "iHumanweek3.pdf")

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx – ## PICOTquestion.docx **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx** MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm** **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be cr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx

    – ## PICOTquestion.docx

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## PICOTquestion.docx**

    PICOT question: In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine (I), compared to usual care (C), reduce stiffness (O) over 8 weeks (T)? This question targets a common healthcare concern, as mild muscle stiffness frequently affects adults due to sedentary behavior, occupational strain, and limited physical activity. In community settings such as Miami-Dade County, this issue is highly prevalent and can negatively influence mobility, comfort, and overall functional status if not addressed early (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Muscle stiffness significantly impacts a patient's quality of life by limiting the range of motion and contributing to discomfort during daily activities. Stretching interventions have been shown to improve flexibility and joint mobility, which are essential for maintaining independence and preventing further musculoskeletal complications. A systematic review by Behm et al. (2023) demonstrated that various stretching techniques produce measurable improvements in range of motion, supporting their effectiveness as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for stiffness reduction.

    At the community and healthcare system levels, untreated muscle stiffness may increase healthcare utilization, including clinic visits, medication use, and potential progression to chronic pain conditions. These outcomes can elevate healthcare costs and reduce workforce productivity. Additionally, evidence indicates that incorporating stretching and ergonomic interventions in routine care can significantly decrease musculoskeletal discomfort, particularly in populations exposed to prolonged sitting or repetitive tasks (Çimen, 2023).

    The proposed 5-minute stretching routine is a feasible, low-cost intervention that can be implemented in primary care clinics and community health settings. It promotes patient self-management, improves physical function, and may reduce long-term complications such as decreased mobility or fall risk. Furthermore, the physiological benefits of stretching—including improved circulation, reduced muscle tension, and enhanced tissue recovery—support its role as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    References

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., … & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine-open, 9(1), 107.

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40(2), 329-332.

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: a comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8596.

    Top of Form

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will be used as the primary frameworks for this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, self-management, and the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The proposed PICOT question focuses on adults with mild muscle stiffness and evaluates whether teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine can reduce stiffness over 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and consistent behavioral change, these frameworks provide appropriate guidance for both nursing practice and project implementation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of empowering individuals to actively participate in their own care to maintain health and well-being (Tanaka, 2022). This theory aligns well with the proposed intervention because stretching exercises are self-care activities that patients can independently perform after receiving proper education and instruction. Within the Capstone project, nurses will teach patients how to correctly complete the stretching routine, explain the benefits of flexibility and mobility, and encourage daily participation. The theory supports the idea that patients who develop effective self-care behaviors are more likely to improve their physical function and reduce discomfort associated with muscle stiffness. Additionally, Orem’s framework promotes preventive care strategies that may help avoid progression into chronic musculoskeletal problems.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will guide the implementation process of the project by providing a structured framework for integrating research evidence into clinical practice. According to Cullen et al. (2022), the Iowa Model assists healthcare professionals in identifying practice problems, evaluating current evidence, implementing interventions, and assessing patient outcomes. In this Capstone project, muscle stiffness will be identified as a clinical concern affecting patient mobility and quality of life. Evidence supporting stretching interventions will be reviewed and incorporated into the intervention design. The 5-minute stretching routine will then be introduced in a primary care or community setting, and outcomes such as reduction in stiffness and improvement in mobility will be evaluated throughout the 8-week period.

    Together, Orem’s theory and the Iowa Model provide a strong foundation for this Capstone project because they support patient-centered care, evidence-based nursing practice, and sustainable behavioral change. These frameworks will help ensure the intervention is practical, effective, and capable of improving patient outcomes through education and self-management.

    References

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics_. Sigma Theta Tau.

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Bottom of Form

    **## PICOTquestion.docx**

    PICOT question: In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine (I), compared to usual care (C), reduce stiffness (O) over 8 weeks (T)? This question targets a common healthcare concern, as mild muscle stiffness frequently affects adults due to sedentary behavior, occupational strain, and limited physical activity. In community settings such as Miami-Dade County, this issue is highly prevalent and can negatively influence mobility, comfort, and overall functional status if not addressed early (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Muscle stiffness significantly impacts a patient's quality of life by limiting the range of motion and contributing to discomfort during daily activities. Stretching interventions have been shown to improve flexibility and joint mobility, which are essential for maintaining independence and preventing further musculoskeletal complications. A systematic review by Behm et al. (2023) demonstrated that various stretching techniques produce measurable improvements in range of motion, supporting their effectiveness as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for stiffness reduction.

    At the community and healthcare system levels, untreated muscle stiffness may increase healthcare utilization, including clinic visits, medication use, and potential progression to chronic pain conditions. These outcomes can elevate healthcare costs and reduce workforce productivity. Additionally, evidence indicates that incorporating stretching and ergonomic interventions in routine care can significantly decrease musculoskeletal discomfort, particularly in populations exposed to prolonged sitting or repetitive tasks (Çimen, 2023).

    The proposed 5-minute stretching routine is a feasible, low-cost intervention that can be implemented in primary care clinics and community health settings. It promotes patient self-management, improves physical function, and may reduce long-term complications such as decreased mobility or fall risk. Furthermore, the physiological benefits of stretching—including improved circulation, reduced muscle tension, and enhanced tissue recovery—support its role as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    References

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., … & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine-open, 9(1), 107.

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40(2), 329-332.

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: a comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8596.

    Top of Form

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will be used as the primary frameworks for this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, self-management, and the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The proposed PICOT question focuses on adults with mild muscle stiffness and evaluates whether teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine can reduce stiffness over 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and consistent behavioral change, these frameworks provide appropriate guidance for both nursing practice and project implementation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of empowering individuals to actively participate in their own care to maintain health and well-being (Tanaka, 2022). This theory aligns well with the proposed intervention because stretching exercises are self-care activities that patients can independently perform after receiving proper education and instruction. Within the Capstone project, nurses will teach patients how to correctly complete the stretching routine, explain the benefits of flexibility and mobility, and encourage daily participation. The theory supports the idea that patients who develop effective self-care behaviors are more likely to improve their physical function and reduce discomfort associated with muscle stiffness. Additionally, Orem’s framework promotes preventive care strategies that may help avoid progression into chronic musculoskeletal problems.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will guide the implementation process of the project by providing a structured framework for integrating research evidence into clinical practice. According to Cullen et al. (2022), the Iowa Model assists healthcare professionals in identifying practice problems, evaluating current evidence, implementing interventions, and assessing patient outcomes. In this Capstone project, muscle stiffness will be identified as a clinical concern affecting patient mobility and quality of life. Evidence supporting stretching interventions will be reviewed and incorporated into the intervention design. The 5-minute stretching routine will then be introduced in a primary care or community setting, and outcomes such as reduction in stiffness and improvement in mobility will be evaluated throughout the 8-week period.

    Together, Orem’s theory and the Iowa Model provide a strong foundation for this Capstone project because they support patient-centered care, evidence-based nursing practice, and sustainable behavioral change. These frameworks will help ensure the intervention is practical, effective, and capable of improving patient outcomes through education and self-management.

    References

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics_. Sigma Theta Tau.

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Bottom of Form

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## PICOTquestion.docx**

    PICOT question: In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine (I), compared to usual care (C), reduce stiffness (O) over 8 weeks (T)? This question targets a common healthcare concern, as mild muscle stiffness frequently affects adults due to sedentary behavior, occupational strain, and limited physical activity. In community settings such as Miami-Dade County, this issue is highly prevalent and can negatively influence mobility, comfort, and overall functional status if not addressed early (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Muscle stiffness significantly impacts a patient's quality of life by limiting the range of motion and contributing to discomfort during daily activities. Stretching interventions have been shown to improve flexibility and joint mobility, which are essential for maintaining independence and preventing further musculoskeletal complications. A systematic review by Behm et al. (2023) demonstrated that various stretching techniques produce measurable improvements in range of motion, supporting their effectiveness as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for stiffness reduction.

    At the community and healthcare system levels, untreated muscle stiffness may increase healthcare utilization, including clinic visits, medication use, and potential progression to chronic pain conditions. These outcomes can elevate healthcare costs and reduce workforce productivity. Additionally, evidence indicates that incorporating stretching and ergonomic interventions in routine care can significantly decrease musculoskeletal discomfort, particularly in populations exposed to prolonged sitting or repetitive tasks (Çimen, 2023).

    The proposed 5-minute stretching routine is a feasible, low-cost intervention that can be implemented in primary care clinics and community health settings. It promotes patient self-management, improves physical function, and may reduce long-term complications such as decreased mobility or fall risk. Furthermore, the physiological benefits of stretching—including improved circulation, reduced muscle tension, and enhanced tissue recovery—support its role as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    References

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., … & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine-open, 9(1), 107.

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40(2), 329-332.

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: a comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8596.

    Top of Form

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will be used as the primary frameworks for this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, self-management, and the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The proposed PICOT question focuses on adults with mild muscle stiffness and evaluates whether teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine can reduce stiffness over 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and consistent behavioral change, these frameworks provide appropriate guidance for both nursing practice and project implementation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of empowering individuals to actively participate in their own care to maintain health and well-being (Tanaka, 2022). This theory aligns well with the proposed intervention because stretching exercises are self-care activities that patients can independently perform after receiving proper education and instruction. Within the Capstone project, nurses will teach patients how to correctly complete the stretching routine, explain the benefits of flexibility and mobility, and encourage daily participation. The theory supports the idea that patients who develop effective self-care behaviors are more likely to improve their physical function and reduce discomfort associated with muscle stiffness. Additionally, Orem’s framework promotes preventive care strategies that may help avoid progression into chronic musculoskeletal problems.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will guide the implementation process of the project by providing a structured framework for integrating research evidence into clinical practice. According to Cullen et al. (2022), the Iowa Model assists healthcare professionals in identifying practice problems, evaluating current evidence, implementing interventions, and assessing patient outcomes. In this Capstone project, muscle stiffness will be identified as a clinical concern affecting patient mobility and quality of life. Evidence supporting stretching interventions will be reviewed and incorporated into the intervention design. The 5-minute stretching routine will then be introduced in a primary care or community setting, and outcomes such as reduction in stiffness and improvement in mobility will be evaluated throughout the 8-week period.

    Together, Orem’s theory and the Iowa Model provide a strong foundation for this Capstone project because they support patient-centered care, evidence-based nursing practice, and sustainable behavioral change. These frameworks will help ensure the intervention is practical, effective, and capable of improving patient outcomes through education and self-management.

    References

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics_. Sigma Theta Tau.

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Bottom of Form

    **## MSNCapstoneProjec1.docx**

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    **## PICOTquestion.docx**

    PICOT question: In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine (I), compared to usual care (C), reduce stiffness (O) over 8 weeks (T)? This question targets a common healthcare concern, as mild muscle stiffness frequently affects adults due to sedentary behavior, occupational strain, and limited physical activity. In community settings such as Miami-Dade County, this issue is highly prevalent and can negatively influence mobility, comfort, and overall functional status if not addressed early (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Muscle stiffness significantly impacts a patient's quality of life by limiting the range of motion and contributing to discomfort during daily activities. Stretching interventions have been shown to improve flexibility and joint mobility, which are essential for maintaining independence and preventing further musculoskeletal complications. A systematic review by Behm et al. (2023) demonstrated that various stretching techniques produce measurable improvements in range of motion, supporting their effectiveness as a simple, non-pharmacological intervention for stiffness reduction.

    At the community and healthcare system levels, untreated muscle stiffness may increase healthcare utilization, including clinic visits, medication use, and potential progression to chronic pain conditions. These outcomes can elevate healthcare costs and reduce workforce productivity. Additionally, evidence indicates that incorporating stretching and ergonomic interventions in routine care can significantly decrease musculoskeletal discomfort, particularly in populations exposed to prolonged sitting or repetitive tasks (Çimen, 2023).

    The proposed 5-minute stretching routine is a feasible, low-cost intervention that can be implemented in primary care clinics and community health settings. It promotes patient self-management, improves physical function, and may reduce long-term complications such as decreased mobility or fall risk. Furthermore, the physiological benefits of stretching—including improved circulation, reduced muscle tension, and enhanced tissue recovery—support its role as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    References

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., … & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine-open, 9(1), 107.

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40(2), 329-332.

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: a comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8596.

    Top of Form

    Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will be used as the primary frameworks for this Capstone project because both theories strongly support patient education, self-management, and the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The proposed PICOT question focuses on adults with mild muscle stiffness and evaluates whether teaching a simple 5-minute stretching routine can reduce stiffness over 8 weeks. Since the intervention depends on patient participation and consistent behavioral change, these frameworks provide appropriate guidance for both nursing practice and project implementation.

    Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory emphasizes the importance of empowering individuals to actively participate in their own care to maintain health and well-being (Tanaka, 2022). This theory aligns well with the proposed intervention because stretching exercises are self-care activities that patients can independently perform after receiving proper education and instruction. Within the Capstone project, nurses will teach patients how to correctly complete the stretching routine, explain the benefits of flexibility and mobility, and encourage daily participation. The theory supports the idea that patients who develop effective self-care behaviors are more likely to improve their physical function and reduce discomfort associated with muscle stiffness. Additionally, Orem’s framework promotes preventive care strategies that may help avoid progression into chronic musculoskeletal problems.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice will guide the implementation process of the project by providing a structured framework for integrating research evidence into clinical practice. According to Cullen et al. (2022), the Iowa Model assists healthcare professionals in identifying practice problems, evaluating current evidence, implementing interventions, and assessing patient outcomes. In this Capstone project, muscle stiffness will be identified as a clinical concern affecting patient mobility and quality of life. Evidence supporting stretching interventions will be reviewed and incorporated into the intervention design. The 5-minute stretching routine will then be introduced in a primary care or community setting, and outcomes such as reduction in stiffness and improvement in mobility will be evaluated throughout the 8-week period.

    Together, Orem’s theory and the Iowa Model provide a strong foundation for this Capstone project because they support patient-centered care, evidence-based nursing practice, and sustainable behavioral change. These frameworks will help ensure the intervention is practical, effective, and capable of improving patient outcomes through education and self-management.

    References

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics_. Sigma Theta Tau.

    Tanaka, M. (2022, May). Orem's nursing self‐care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. In
    _Nursing forum_ (Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 480-485).

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation Module3** **files (2)** – ## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx** **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation** Write a 2500-word essay addressing each of the following …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation Module3**

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx

    – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx**

    **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation**

    Write a 2500-word essay addressing each of the following points. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
    **The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Place yourself on the healthcare administration team as a DNP leader. As part of the executive team, you are evaluating electronic health record systems for the organization. A tool in the form of a rubric with evaluation criteria and a grading system is needed for each team member to provide input on each electronic health record system that is being considered.

    **Create an evaluation tool rubric containing at least five criteria.**

    **Follow the rubric with a paper that provides the rationale for each criterion you chose to include.**

    **Your assignment should contain:**

    1.
    **the evaluation tool rubric you create,**

    2.
    **an introduction to the tool,**

    3.
    **the rationale for each component of the rubric,**

    4.
    **and a conclusion.**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** **2500 words**

    ·
    **Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **References:**

    Use appropriate APA-style in-text citations and references for all resources used to answer the questions.
    **Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Learning Materials**

    **Required Resources**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. ISBN:9781284220469. Read chapters 2 &14.

    **Additional resources**

    Pendyala, S. K. (2024). Healthcare data analytics: Leveraging predictive analytics for improved patient outcomes.
    _International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (Ijcet)_,
    _15_(6), 548-565.
    [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001)

    Huarng, K.H, Hui-Kuang Yu, T., & Lee, C. F. (2022). Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices.
    _Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174_.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub)

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019, August).
    _Health Information Technology Integration._ [https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html)

    Adeniyi, A. O., Arowoogun, J. O., Chidi, R., Okolo, C. A., & Babawarun, O. (2024). The impact of electronic health records on patient care and outcomes: A comprehensive review.World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1446-1455.
    [https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592](https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592)

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    5/7/26, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335761/View 1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    5/7/26, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335761/View 1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx**

    **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation**

    Write a 2500-word essay addressing each of the following points. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
    **The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Place yourself on the healthcare administration team as a DNP leader. As part of the executive team, you are evaluating electronic health record systems for the organization. A tool in the form of a rubric with evaluation criteria and a grading system is needed for each team member to provide input on each electronic health record system that is being considered.

    **Create an evaluation tool rubric containing at least five criteria.**

    **Follow the rubric with a paper that provides the rationale for each criterion you chose to include.**

    **Your assignment should contain:**

    1.
    **the evaluation tool rubric you create,**

    2.
    **an introduction to the tool,**

    3.
    **the rationale for each component of the rubric,**

    4.
    **and a conclusion.**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** **2500 words**

    ·
    **Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **References:**

    Use appropriate APA-style in-text citations and references for all resources used to answer the questions.
    **Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Learning Materials**

    **Required Resources**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. ISBN:9781284220469. Read chapters 2 &14.

    **Additional resources**

    Pendyala, S. K. (2024). Healthcare data analytics: Leveraging predictive analytics for improved patient outcomes.
    _International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (Ijcet)_,
    _15_(6), 548-565.
    [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001)

    Huarng, K.H, Hui-Kuang Yu, T., & Lee, C. F. (2022). Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices.
    _Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174_.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub)

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019, August).
    _Health Information Technology Integration._ [https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html)

    Adeniyi, A. O., Arowoogun, J. O., Chidi, R., Okolo, C. A., & Babawarun, O. (2024). The impact of electronic health records on patient care and outcomes: A comprehensive review.World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1446-1455.
    [https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592](https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592)

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    5/7/26, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335761/View 1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-QUESTION.docx**

    **Health Information System Evaluation Tool Creation**

    Write a 2500-word essay addressing each of the following points. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
    **The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Place yourself on the healthcare administration team as a DNP leader. As part of the executive team, you are evaluating electronic health record systems for the organization. A tool in the form of a rubric with evaluation criteria and a grading system is needed for each team member to provide input on each electronic health record system that is being considered.

    **Create an evaluation tool rubric containing at least five criteria.**

    **Follow the rubric with a paper that provides the rationale for each criterion you chose to include.**

    **Your assignment should contain:**

    1.
    **the evaluation tool rubric you create,**

    2.
    **an introduction to the tool,**

    3.
    **the rationale for each component of the rubric,**

    4.
    **and a conclusion.**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** **2500 words**

    ·
    **Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **References:**

    Use appropriate APA-style in-text citations and references for all resources used to answer the questions.
    **Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Learning Materials**

    **Required Resources**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. ISBN:9781284220469. Read chapters 2 &14.

    **Additional resources**

    Pendyala, S. K. (2024). Healthcare data analytics: Leveraging predictive analytics for improved patient outcomes.
    _International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (Ijcet)_,
    _15_(6), 548-565.
    [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14197001)

    Huarng, K.H, Hui-Kuang Yu, T., & Lee, C. F. (2022). Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices.
    _Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174_.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007204?via%3Dihub)

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019, August).
    _Health Information Technology Integration._ [https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/health-it/index.html)

    Adeniyi, A. O., Arowoogun, J. O., Chidi, R., Okolo, C. A., & Babawarun, O. (2024). The impact of electronic health records on patient care and outcomes: A comprehensive review.World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1446-1455.
    [https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592](https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0592)

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    5/7/26, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335761/View 1/5

  • [Solved] Credible source

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Discussion3.docx **## Discussion3.docx** **Must be less than 10% AI detectable on Turnitin. No plagiarism-must be original writing,due by 5/20/26 5PM Eastern time. Must be at least 300 words.** Answer the following question: You will find a source (an article, blog post, or web pa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Discussion3.docx

    **## Discussion3.docx**

    **Must be less than 10% AI detectable on Turnitin. No plagiarism-must be original writing,due by 5/20/26 5PM Eastern time. Must be at least 300 words.**

    Answer the following question:

    You will find a source (an article, blog post, or web page) related to a topic that you are interested in. You will summarize the source for your classmates and then evaluate the source by answering the following:

    · Pick three criteria from the list below and evaluate how the source you picked measures up in a well-developed post that cites evidence to prove your stance.

    · Credibility

    · Relevancy

    · Currency

    · Accuracy

    · Reasonability

    · Reliability

    · Objectivity

    · Reflect on how using or citing this source would impact your own credibility as a writer. For example, would this source be used in a college paper or professional communication? Why or why not?

    **Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.**

    **## Discussion3.docx**

    **Must be less than 10% AI detectable on Turnitin. No plagiarism-must be original writing,due by 5/20/26 5PM Eastern time. Must be at least 300 words.**

    Answer the following question:

    You will find a source (an article, blog post, or web page) related to a topic that you are interested in. You will summarize the source for your classmates and then evaluate the source by answering the following:

    · Pick three criteria from the list below and evaluate how the source you picked measures up in a well-developed post that cites evidence to prove your stance.

    · Credibility

    · Relevancy

    · Currency

    · Accuracy

    · Reasonability

    · Reliability

    · Objectivity

    · Reflect on how using or citing this source would impact your own credibility as a writer. For example, would this source be used in a college paper or professional communication? Why or why not?

    **Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.**

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## QIAsignment1Inst.docx **## QIAsignment1Inst.docx** **_Assignment 1_** Critique the article by Rashid et al. located in [Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/53912/pages/module-1-lecture-materials-and-resources). Focus on the process of inter…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## QIAsignment1Inst.docx

    **## QIAsignment1Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 1_**

    Critique the article by Rashid et al. located in
    [Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/53912/pages/module-1-lecture-materials-and-resources). Focus on the process of intervention research and application to evidence-based practice. Discuss strategies to implement the findings to improve quality outcomes in practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 3-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    **## QIAsignment1Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 1_**

    Critique the article by Rashid et al. located in
    [Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/53912/pages/module-1-lecture-materials-and-resources). Focus on the process of intervention research and application to evidence-based practice. Discuss strategies to implement the findings to improve quality outcomes in practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 3-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ IMG_7887.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7887-png "IMG_7887.png") – [\ \ IMG_7888.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7888-png "IMG_7888.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    IMG_7887.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7887-png "IMG_7887.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_7888.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7888-png "IMG_7888.png")