Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] assessment 2_6011

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering assessment 2_6011.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Qualitative Journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx – BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf **## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx** **Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions** **Purpose:** The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx

    – BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf

    **## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx**

    **Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions**

    **Purpose:** The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology.

    Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following:

    1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document

    1. At the top of the template provide an APA 7th edition citation for the article.

    2. Follow the APA citation with a brief review of the purpose of the article: i.e., between 2 and 4 sentences.

    2. Answer all of the questions on the template.

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research Article**

    **Topic:** Back to the Roots of Nursing: Qualitative Study on the Experience of Nurses in the Front Line During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    **Article Citation in APA Format:**

    **Purpose of Study:**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Research Design:** Identify the research design. Discuss whether it is appropriate for the topic under investigation. Is it appropriate? How do you know? | |
    | **Sample Selection**: How was the sample selected? What type of sample was used. Was the sample size adequate for Qualitative research? How do you know (ex. Was saturation achieved?) | |
    | **Data Collection Methods:** Describe the data collection procedures. Where there any issues noted during data collection that may have impacted the study outcomes? Is there another approach that could have been used to collect data? If so which approach? If not why not? | |
    | **Data Collection Measures/Tools:** What was used for data collection. Was it appropriate for Qualitative research? How do you know? | |
    | **Plans for Data Analysis:** How was data analyzed? How were themes or categories achieved? How do you know? | |
    | **Strengths:** What are the strengths of the research? Note at least two and give a rationale for each. | |
    | **Weaknesses:** What are the main weaknesses of the study. Note two and provide a rationale for each. | |

    **References**

    **BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/backtotherootsofnursing-pdf)

    **BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/backtotherootsofnursing-pdf)

    **## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx**

    **Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions**

    **Purpose:** The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology.

    Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following:

    1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document

    1. At the top of the template provide an APA 7th edition citation for the article.

    2. Follow the APA citation with a brief review of the purpose of the article: i.e., between 2 and 4 sentences.

    2. Answer all of the questions on the template.

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research Article**

    **Topic:** Back to the Roots of Nursing: Qualitative Study on the Experience of Nurses in the Front Line During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    **Article Citation in APA Format:**

    **Purpose of Study:**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Research Design:** Identify the research design. Discuss whether it is appropriate for the topic under investigation. Is it appropriate? How do you know? | |
    | **Sample Selection**: How was the sample selected? What type of sample was used. Was the sample size adequate for Qualitative research? How do you know (ex. Was saturation achieved?) | |
    | **Data Collection Methods:** Describe the data collection procedures. Where there any issues noted during data collection that may have impacted the study outcomes? Is there another approach that could have been used to collect data? If so which approach? If not why not? | |
    | **Data Collection Measures/Tools:** What was used for data collection. Was it appropriate for Qualitative research? How do you know? | |
    | **Plans for Data Analysis:** How was data analyzed? How were themes or categories achieved? How do you know? | |
    | **Strengths:** What are the strengths of the research? Note at least two and give a rationale for each. | |
    | **Weaknesses:** What are the main weaknesses of the study. Note two and provide a rationale for each. | |

    **References**

    **BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/backtotherootsofnursing-pdf)

    **## QuanlitativeJournalClubTemplate.docx**

    **Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions**

    **Purpose:** The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology.

    Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following:

    1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document

    1. At the top of the template provide an APA 7th edition citation for the article.

    2. Follow the APA citation with a brief review of the purpose of the article: i.e., between 2 and 4 sentences.

    2. Answer all of the questions on the template.

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research Article**

    **Topic:** Back to the Roots of Nursing: Qualitative Study on the Experience of Nurses in the Front Line During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    **Article Citation in APA Format:**

    **Purpose of Study:**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Research Design:** Identify the research design. Discuss whether it is appropriate for the topic under investigation. Is it appropriate? How do you know? | |
    | **Sample Selection**: How was the sample selected? What type of sample was used. Was the sample size adequate for Qualitative research? How do you know (ex. Was saturation achieved?) | |
    | **Data Collection Methods:** Describe the data collection procedures. Where there any issues noted during data collection that may have impacted the study outcomes? Is there another approach that could have been used to collect data? If so which approach? If not why not? | |
    | **Data Collection Measures/Tools:** What was used for data collection. Was it appropriate for Qualitative research? How do you know? | |
    | **Plans for Data Analysis:** How was data analyzed? How were themes or categories achieved? How do you know? | |
    | **Strengths:** What are the strengths of the research? Note at least two and give a rationale for each. | |
    | **Weaknesses:** What are the main weaknesses of the study. Note two and provide a rationale for each. | |

    **References**

    **BacktotheRootsofNursing.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/backtotherootsofnursing-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NursingLeadershipInformingCommunityHealthInformationExchangeStrategy.docx **## NursingLeadershipInformingCommunityHealthInformationExchangeStrategy.docx** Nursing Leadership Informing Community Health Information Exchange Strategy You are in the chief nursing officer role and have been asked by…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NursingLeadershipInformingCommunityHealthInformationExchangeStrategy.docx

    **## NursingLeadershipInformingCommunityHealthInformationExchangeStrategy.docx**

    Nursing Leadership Informing Community Health Information Exchange Strategy

    You are in the chief nursing officer role and have been asked by your healthcare system to represent the hospital on the board of a new not-for-profit entity established by your community to build and manage the HIE within your region. Your region has been awarded a federal grant of $250,000 to build the HIE to serve the community. At the first board meeting of diverse stakeholders, including payers, providers, hospitals, public health, and healthcare consumers, the group must advise the chief executive on what type of exchange the group believes is needed. The chief executive indicates that a basic exchange using the Direct Project protocols for the size of the community is likely to exceed the federal grant dollars, and as such, the group needs to align on a value proposition of what the community needs. This is hoped to result in the community being willing to pay for the additional costs.

               The community has a population of more than 250,000, with a significant indigent population that tends to use the ED as an access to care for routine healthcare needs. Hospital staff also suspect that they have drug seekers going from one ED to the next seeking additional medications, yet do not have the information to confirm this suspicion or to track patients from one institution to another.

               The community has two major healthcare systems that are heatedly competitive and unlikely to be willing to share data in a central data repository. Providers in the community compromise one large-practice consortium and multiple independent providers. The large group of providers is demanding that some sort of exchange be established to support their referral base. As a result, there is heated debate as to whether the community aligns with a business and infrastructure strategy.

    Based on information within Chapter 11, consider the following questions:

    1.    Based on the needs of the community noted in the case study, what is your recommendation as to the best infrastructure and technical exchange model that the community should promote?

    2.    What are some of the barriers consistent with other communities’ failures that might be issues for your community and how do you overcome those issues?

    Please note the grading rubric. The submission should be minimally 4 pages not counting the cover page and 5 references.

    **## NursingLeadershipInformingCommunityHealthInformationExchangeStrategy.docx**

    Nursing Leadership Informing Community Health Information Exchange Strategy

    You are in the chief nursing officer role and have been asked by your healthcare system to represent the hospital on the board of a new not-for-profit entity established by your community to build and manage the HIE within your region. Your region has been awarded a federal grant of $250,000 to build the HIE to serve the community. At the first board meeting of diverse stakeholders, including payers, providers, hospitals, public health, and healthcare consumers, the group must advise the chief executive on what type of exchange the group believes is needed. The chief executive indicates that a basic exchange using the Direct Project protocols for the size of the community is likely to exceed the federal grant dollars, and as such, the group needs to align on a value proposition of what the community needs. This is hoped to result in the community being willing to pay for the additional costs.

               The community has a population of more than 250,000, with a significant indigent population that tends to use the ED as an access to care for routine healthcare needs. Hospital staff also suspect that they have drug seekers going from one ED to the next seeking additional medications, yet do not have the information to confirm this suspicion or to track patients from one institution to another.

               The community has two major healthcare systems that are heatedly competitive and unlikely to be willing to share data in a central data repository. Providers in the community compromise one large-practice consortium and multiple independent providers. The large group of providers is demanding that some sort of exchange be established to support their referral base. As a result, there is heated debate as to whether the community aligns with a business and infrastructure strategy.

    Based on information within Chapter 11, consider the following questions:

    1.    Based on the needs of the community noted in the case study, what is your recommendation as to the best infrastructure and technical exchange model that the community should promote?

    2.    What are some of the barriers consistent with other communities’ failures that might be issues for your community and how do you overcome those issues?

    Please note the grading rubric. The submission should be minimally 4 pages not counting the cover page and 5 references.

  • [Solved] nur521

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need assistance with a question – ## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx – ## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf **## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx** **_Realistic Treatment Plan_** For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need assistance with a question

    – ## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx

    – ## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf

    **## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx**

    **_Realistic Treatment Plan_**

    For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.
    **Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in the actual slides.** You will record narration for the slides in the next assignment, so keep that in mind as you work.

    and

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.
    **Submit all information for rubric grading on the slides only (the notes section will not be graded).**

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.

    · Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.

    · Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

    **Content Requirements**

    You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information based on the DSM5-TR and current US clinical guidelines to support the case:

    1. Subjective data:

    · Chief Complaint

    · Demographics

    · History of the Present Illness (HPI) includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem. See an example of the correct way to document the psychiatric HPI hereLinks to an external site.

    · Review of Systems (ROS)

    2. Objective data:

    · Current Medications

    · Allergies

    · Past medical history

    · Family psychiatric history

    · Social history

    · Labs and screening tools

    · Vital signs

    · Mental status exam

    3. Assessment:

    · Primary Diagnosis – DSM5 only

    · Differential diagnosis – DSM5 only

    4. Plan:

    · Pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Non-pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Follow up plan

    5. Other:

    · Incorporation of current US clinical guidelines

    · Integration of research articles

    · Role of the nurse practitioner

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    **## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf**

    Realistic Treatment Plan Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Realistic Case Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Chief
    Complaint
    (Reason for
    seeking health
    care) – S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a direct quote
    from the patient about
    presenting problem.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a direct
    quote from the
    patient and other
    unrelated
    information.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes information
    but the information is
    NOT a direct quote.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Demographics –
    S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Begins with patient
    initials, age, race,
    ethnicity, and gender
    (5 demographics).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Begins with 4 of the
    5 patient
    demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Developing – 1 point
    Begins with 3 or less
    patient demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    History of the
    Present Illness
    (HPI) – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and the 8 dimensions
    of the problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing and Severity).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 6 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Developing – 2
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Novice – 0-1 point
    The presenting
    problem is not clearly
    stated and/or there are
    < 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    5 points

    Allergies – S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes NKA
    (including = Drug,
    Environmental, Food,
    Herbal, and/or Latex
    or if allergies are
    present (reports for
    each severity of
    allergy AND
    description of allergy).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Only screened for
    one type of allergy
    (drug, environmental,
    herbal, food or latex).
    If allergies are
    present, list type
    drug, environmental
    factor, herbal, food,
    latex name and
    include the severity
    of allergy OR
    description of the
    allergy.

    Developing –
    1 points
    If allergies are
    present, students lists
    only the type of
    allergy name.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Review of
    Systems (ROS)
    – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes a minimum
    of 3 assessments for
    each body system,
    assesses at least 9
    body systems directed
    to chief complaint,
    AND uses the words
    “admits” and “denies”.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, assesses
    5-8 body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, AND uses
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, and
    assesses less than 5
    body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, OR
    student does not use
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Vital Signs – O

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes all 8 vital
    signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature (with
    Fahrenheit or Celsius
    and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Includes at least 6
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes at least 4
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Labs,
    Diagnostic
    Tests and
    Screening Tools
    – O

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools that
    should be completed
    for identified patient
    that are based on the
    US clinical guidelines
    OR acknowledges no
    labs/diagnostic tests
    are recommended.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    that should be
    completed the
    identified patient but
    they do not follow the
    US clinical
    guidelines.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    reviewed for the
    identified patient but
    they are inappropriate
    or do not address the
    patient's problem.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Medications-S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a list of all of
    the patient reported
    psychiatric and
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name, dose,
    route, frequency).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a list of all
    of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and but omits the
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name,
    dose, route,
    frequency).

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes a list of
    some of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and/or medical
    medications and the
    diagnosis for the
    medication (omits the
    dose, route,
    frequency of the
    medications).

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Past Medical
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes each
    medical diagnosis but
    does not include year
    of diagnosis or

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, year of
    diagnosis and whether
    the diagnosis is active
    or current.

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, either year
    of diagnosis OR
    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    Past Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis and.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (omits
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    does not include the
    year of diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Family
    Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    6 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history of
    suicidal attempts.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    4 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    2 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Social History-
    S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Distinguished Includes
    all 11 of the following:
    tobacco use, drug use,
    alcohol use, marital
    status, employment
    status, current and
    previous occupation,
    sexual orientation,
    sexually active,
    contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes at least 8 of
    the following:
    tobacco use, drug
    use, alcohol use,
    marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes all 6 of the
    following: tobacco
    use, drug use, alcohol
    use, marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Mental Status
    Exam-O

    Exemplary – 12-15
    points
    Includes all 10
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and judgement)
    with detailed
    descriptions for each
    area.

    Distinguished – 8-11
    points
    Includes all 8
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    detailed descriptions
    for each area.

    Developing – 4-
    7 points
    Includes >6
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    some descriptions for
    each area.

    Novice – 0-3 points
    Includes <3
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) OR
    detailed descriptions
    is not included for
    each area.

    15
    points

    Primary
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 5-6
    points
    Includes a clear
    outline of the accurate
    principal diagnosis
    based on DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR criteria.

    Distinguished – 3-4
    points
    Includes an
    inaccurate diagnosis
    as the principal
    diagnosis based on
    DSM5 or DSM5-TR
    criteria.

    Developing – 1-2
    point
    Includes a medical
    diagnosis based as the
    principal diagnosis
    OR the diagnosis is
    not a DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    6 points

    Differential
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes at least 2
    differential diagnoses
    for the principal
    diagnosis.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes 2 differential
    diagnoses for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes 1 differential
    diagnosis for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Treatment

    Exemplary – 11-15
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for each
    of the diagnoses listed
    under “assessment”.
    The plan includes
    ALL of the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration. If
    the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Distinguished – 6-10
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4-7 of
    the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration.
    If the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Developing – 1-5
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4 of the
    following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    Non-pharmacological
    treatment NOT
    included. If the
    diagnosis is a chronic
    problem, student
    includes instructions
    on currently
    prescribed
    medications as above.

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    15
    points

    Referral

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Provides a detailed list
    of medical and other
    interdisciplinary
    referrals or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other
    interdisciplinary
    referral or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other interdisciplinary
    referral. DOES NOT
    include a timeline for
    follow up
    appointments.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    APA
    Formatting

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work.
    Exceptional use of
    citations and extended
    referencing. High level
    of precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    Moderate level of
    precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Ineffectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    APA 7th Edition
    writing style not
    strictly adhered to.

    Novice – 0 points
    APA style and writing
    mechanics not used.

    5 points

    Total Points 90

    **## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf**

    Realistic Treatment Plan Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Realistic Case Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Chief
    Complaint
    (Reason for
    seeking health
    care) – S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a direct quote
    from the patient about
    presenting problem.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a direct
    quote from the
    patient and other
    unrelated
    information.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes information
    but the information is
    NOT a direct quote.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Demographics –
    S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Begins with patient
    initials, age, race,
    ethnicity, and gender
    (5 demographics).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Begins with 4 of the
    5 patient
    demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Developing – 1 point
    Begins with 3 or less
    patient demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    History of the
    Present Illness
    (HPI) – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and the 8 dimensions
    of the problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing and Severity).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 6 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Developing – 2
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Novice – 0-1 point
    The presenting
    problem is not clearly
    stated and/or there are
    < 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    5 points

    Allergies – S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes NKA
    (including = Drug,
    Environmental, Food,
    Herbal, and/or Latex
    or if allergies are
    present (reports for
    each severity of
    allergy AND
    description of allergy).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Only screened for
    one type of allergy
    (drug, environmental,
    herbal, food or latex).
    If allergies are
    present, list type
    drug, environmental
    factor, herbal, food,
    latex name and
    include the severity
    of allergy OR
    description of the
    allergy.

    Developing –
    1 points
    If allergies are
    present, students lists
    only the type of
    allergy name.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Review of
    Systems (ROS)
    – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes a minimum
    of 3 assessments for
    each body system,
    assesses at least 9
    body systems directed
    to chief complaint,
    AND uses the words
    “admits” and “denies”.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, assesses
    5-8 body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, AND uses
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, and
    assesses less than 5
    body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, OR
    student does not use
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Vital Signs – O

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes all 8 vital
    signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature (with
    Fahrenheit or Celsius
    and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Includes at least 6
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes at least 4
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Labs,
    Diagnostic
    Tests and
    Screening Tools
    – O

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools that
    should be completed
    for identified patient
    that are based on the
    US clinical guidelines
    OR acknowledges no
    labs/diagnostic tests
    are recommended.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    that should be
    completed the
    identified patient but
    they do not follow the
    US clinical
    guidelines.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    reviewed for the
    identified patient but
    they are inappropriate
    or do not address the
    patient's problem.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Medications-S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a list of all of
    the patient reported
    psychiatric and
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name, dose,
    route, frequency).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a list of all
    of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and but omits the
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name,
    dose, route,
    frequency).

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes a list of
    some of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and/or medical
    medications and the
    diagnosis for the
    medication (omits the
    dose, route,
    frequency of the
    medications).

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Past Medical
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes each
    medical diagnosis but
    does not include year
    of diagnosis or

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, year of
    diagnosis and whether
    the diagnosis is active
    or current.

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, either year
    of diagnosis OR
    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    Past Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis and.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (omits
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    does not include the
    year of diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Family
    Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    6 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history of
    suicidal attempts.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    4 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    2 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Social History-
    S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Distinguished Includes
    all 11 of the following:
    tobacco use, drug use,
    alcohol use, marital
    status, employment
    status, current and
    previous occupation,
    sexual orientation,
    sexually active,
    contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes at least 8 of
    the following:
    tobacco use, drug
    use, alcohol use,
    marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes all 6 of the
    following: tobacco
    use, drug use, alcohol
    use, marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Mental Status
    Exam-O

    Exemplary – 12-15
    points
    Includes all 10
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and judgement)
    with detailed
    descriptions for each
    area.

    Distinguished – 8-11
    points
    Includes all 8
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    detailed descriptions
    for each area.

    Developing – 4-
    7 points
    Includes >6
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    some descriptions for
    each area.

    Novice – 0-3 points
    Includes <3
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) OR
    detailed descriptions
    is not included for
    each area.

    15
    points

    Primary
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 5-6
    points
    Includes a clear
    outline of the accurate
    principal diagnosis
    based on DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR criteria.

    Distinguished – 3-4
    points
    Includes an
    inaccurate diagnosis
    as the principal
    diagnosis based on
    DSM5 or DSM5-TR
    criteria.

    Developing – 1-2
    point
    Includes a medical
    diagnosis based as the
    principal diagnosis
    OR the diagnosis is
    not a DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    6 points

    Differential
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes at least 2
    differential diagnoses
    for the principal
    diagnosis.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes 2 differential
    diagnoses for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes 1 differential
    diagnosis for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Treatment

    Exemplary – 11-15
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for each
    of the diagnoses listed
    under “assessment”.
    The plan includes
    ALL of the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration. If
    the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Distinguished – 6-10
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4-7 of
    the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration.
    If the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Developing – 1-5
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4 of the
    following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    Non-pharmacological
    treatment NOT
    included. If the
    diagnosis is a chronic
    problem, student
    includes instructions
    on currently
    prescribed
    medications as above.

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    15
    points

    Referral

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Provides a detailed list
    of medical and other
    interdisciplinary
    referrals or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other
    interdisciplinary
    referral or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other interdisciplinary
    referral. DOES NOT
    include a timeline for
    follow up
    appointments.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    APA
    Formatting

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work.
    Exceptional use of
    citations and extended
    referencing. High level
    of precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    Moderate level of
    precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Ineffectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    APA 7th Edition
    writing style not
    strictly adhered to.

    Novice – 0 points
    APA style and writing
    mechanics not used.

    5 points

    Total Points 90

    **## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx**

    **_Realistic Treatment Plan_**

    For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.
    **Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in the actual slides.** You will record narration for the slides in the next assignment, so keep that in mind as you work.

    and

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.
    **Submit all information for rubric grading on the slides only (the notes section will not be graded).**

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.

    · Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.

    · Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

    **Content Requirements**

    You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information based on the DSM5-TR and current US clinical guidelines to support the case:

    1. Subjective data:

    · Chief Complaint

    · Demographics

    · History of the Present Illness (HPI) includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem. See an example of the correct way to document the psychiatric HPI hereLinks to an external site.

    · Review of Systems (ROS)

    2. Objective data:

    · Current Medications

    · Allergies

    · Past medical history

    · Family psychiatric history

    · Social history

    · Labs and screening tools

    · Vital signs

    · Mental status exam

    3. Assessment:

    · Primary Diagnosis – DSM5 only

    · Differential diagnosis – DSM5 only

    4. Plan:

    · Pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Non-pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Follow up plan

    5. Other:

    · Incorporation of current US clinical guidelines

    · Integration of research articles

    · Role of the nurse practitioner

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    **## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf**

    Realistic Treatment Plan Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Realistic Case Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Chief
    Complaint
    (Reason for
    seeking health
    care) – S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a direct quote
    from the patient about
    presenting problem.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a direct
    quote from the
    patient and other
    unrelated
    information.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes information
    but the information is
    NOT a direct quote.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Demographics –
    S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Begins with patient
    initials, age, race,
    ethnicity, and gender
    (5 demographics).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Begins with 4 of the
    5 patient
    demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Developing – 1 point
    Begins with 3 or less
    patient demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    History of the
    Present Illness
    (HPI) – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and the 8 dimensions
    of the problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing and Severity).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 6 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Developing – 2
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Novice – 0-1 point
    The presenting
    problem is not clearly
    stated and/or there are
    < 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    5 points

    Allergies – S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes NKA
    (including = Drug,
    Environmental, Food,
    Herbal, and/or Latex
    or if allergies are
    present (reports for
    each severity of
    allergy AND
    description of allergy).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Only screened for
    one type of allergy
    (drug, environmental,
    herbal, food or latex).
    If allergies are
    present, list type
    drug, environmental
    factor, herbal, food,
    latex name and
    include the severity
    of allergy OR
    description of the
    allergy.

    Developing –
    1 points
    If allergies are
    present, students lists
    only the type of
    allergy name.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Review of
    Systems (ROS)
    – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes a minimum
    of 3 assessments for
    each body system,
    assesses at least 9
    body systems directed
    to chief complaint,
    AND uses the words
    “admits” and “denies”.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, assesses
    5-8 body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, AND uses
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, and
    assesses less than 5
    body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, OR
    student does not use
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Vital Signs – O

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes all 8 vital
    signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature (with
    Fahrenheit or Celsius
    and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Includes at least 6
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes at least 4
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Labs,
    Diagnostic
    Tests and
    Screening Tools
    – O

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools that
    should be completed
    for identified patient
    that are based on the
    US clinical guidelines
    OR acknowledges no
    labs/diagnostic tests
    are recommended.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    that should be
    completed the
    identified patient but
    they do not follow the
    US clinical
    guidelines.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    reviewed for the
    identified patient but
    they are inappropriate
    or do not address the
    patient's problem.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Medications-S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a list of all of
    the patient reported
    psychiatric and
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name, dose,
    route, frequency).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a list of all
    of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and but omits the
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name,
    dose, route,
    frequency).

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes a list of
    some of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and/or medical
    medications and the
    diagnosis for the
    medication (omits the
    dose, route,
    frequency of the
    medications).

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Past Medical
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes each
    medical diagnosis but
    does not include year
    of diagnosis or

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, year of
    diagnosis and whether
    the diagnosis is active
    or current.

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, either year
    of diagnosis OR
    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    Past Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis and.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (omits
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    does not include the
    year of diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Family
    Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    6 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history of
    suicidal attempts.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    4 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    2 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Social History-
    S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Distinguished Includes
    all 11 of the following:
    tobacco use, drug use,
    alcohol use, marital
    status, employment
    status, current and
    previous occupation,
    sexual orientation,
    sexually active,
    contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes at least 8 of
    the following:
    tobacco use, drug
    use, alcohol use,
    marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes all 6 of the
    following: tobacco
    use, drug use, alcohol
    use, marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Mental Status
    Exam-O

    Exemplary – 12-15
    points
    Includes all 10
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and judgement)
    with detailed
    descriptions for each
    area.

    Distinguished – 8-11
    points
    Includes all 8
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    detailed descriptions
    for each area.

    Developing – 4-
    7 points
    Includes >6
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    some descriptions for
    each area.

    Novice – 0-3 points
    Includes <3
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) OR
    detailed descriptions
    is not included for
    each area.

    15
    points

    Primary
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 5-6
    points
    Includes a clear
    outline of the accurate
    principal diagnosis
    based on DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR criteria.

    Distinguished – 3-4
    points
    Includes an
    inaccurate diagnosis
    as the principal
    diagnosis based on
    DSM5 or DSM5-TR
    criteria.

    Developing – 1-2
    point
    Includes a medical
    diagnosis based as the
    principal diagnosis
    OR the diagnosis is
    not a DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    6 points

    Differential
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes at least 2
    differential diagnoses
    for the principal
    diagnosis.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes 2 differential
    diagnoses for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes 1 differential
    diagnosis for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Treatment

    Exemplary – 11-15
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for each
    of the diagnoses listed
    under “assessment”.
    The plan includes
    ALL of the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration. If
    the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Distinguished – 6-10
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4-7 of
    the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration.
    If the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Developing – 1-5
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4 of the
    following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    Non-pharmacological
    treatment NOT
    included. If the
    diagnosis is a chronic
    problem, student
    includes instructions
    on currently
    prescribed
    medications as above.

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    15
    points

    Referral

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Provides a detailed list
    of medical and other
    interdisciplinary
    referrals or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other
    interdisciplinary
    referral or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other interdisciplinary
    referral. DOES NOT
    include a timeline for
    follow up
    appointments.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    APA
    Formatting

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work.
    Exceptional use of
    citations and extended
    referencing. High level
    of precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    Moderate level of
    precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Ineffectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    APA 7th Edition
    writing style not
    strictly adhered to.

    Novice – 0 points
    APA style and writing
    mechanics not used.

    5 points

    Total Points 90

    **## psychopharmaassignmnet1.docx**

    **_Realistic Treatment Plan_**

    For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.
    **Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in the actual slides.** You will record narration for the slides in the next assignment, so keep that in mind as you work.

    and

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.
    **Submit all information for rubric grading on the slides only (the notes section will not be graded).**

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.

    · Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.

    · Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

    **Content Requirements**

    You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information based on the DSM5-TR and current US clinical guidelines to support the case:

    1. Subjective data:

    · Chief Complaint

    · Demographics

    · History of the Present Illness (HPI) includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem. See an example of the correct way to document the psychiatric HPI hereLinks to an external site.

    · Review of Systems (ROS)

    2. Objective data:

    · Current Medications

    · Allergies

    · Past medical history

    · Family psychiatric history

    · Social history

    · Labs and screening tools

    · Vital signs

    · Mental status exam

    3. Assessment:

    · Primary Diagnosis – DSM5 only

    · Differential diagnosis – DSM5 only

    4. Plan:

    · Pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Non-pharmacologic treatment plan

    · Follow up plan

    5. Other:

    · Incorporation of current US clinical guidelines

    · Integration of research articles

    · Role of the nurse practitioner

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly
    **journal articles** or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    **Journal articles** should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    **## RealisticTreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf**

    Realistic Treatment Plan Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Realistic Case Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Chief
    Complaint
    (Reason for
    seeking health
    care) – S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a direct quote
    from the patient about
    presenting problem.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a direct
    quote from the
    patient and other
    unrelated
    information.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes information
    but the information is
    NOT a direct quote.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Demographics –
    S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Begins with patient
    initials, age, race,
    ethnicity, and gender
    (5 demographics).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Begins with 4 of the
    5 patient
    demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Developing – 1 point
    Begins with 3 or less
    patient demographics
    (patient initials, age,
    race, ethnicity, and
    gender).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    History of the
    Present Illness
    (HPI) – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and the 8 dimensions
    of the problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing and Severity).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 6 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Developing – 2
    points
    Includes the
    presenting problem
    and 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    Novice – 0-1 point
    The presenting
    problem is not clearly
    stated and/or there are
    < 4 of the 8
    dimensions of the
    problem (OLD
    CARTS – Onset,
    Location, Duration,
    Character,
    Aggravating factors,
    Relieving factors,
    Timing.

    5 points

    Allergies – S

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes NKA
    (including = Drug,
    Environmental, Food,
    Herbal, and/or Latex
    or if allergies are
    present (reports for
    each severity of
    allergy AND
    description of allergy).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Only screened for
    one type of allergy
    (drug, environmental,
    herbal, food or latex).
    If allergies are
    present, list type
    drug, environmental
    factor, herbal, food,
    latex name and
    include the severity
    of allergy OR
    description of the
    allergy.

    Developing –
    1 points
    If allergies are
    present, students lists
    only the type of
    allergy name.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Review of
    Systems (ROS)
    – S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes a minimum
    of 3 assessments for
    each body system,
    assesses at least 9
    body systems directed
    to chief complaint,
    AND uses the words
    “admits” and “denies”.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, assesses
    5-8 body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, AND uses
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes 3 or fewer
    assessments for each
    body system, and
    assesses less than 5
    body systems
    directed to chief
    complaint, OR
    student does not use
    the words “admits”
    and “denies”.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Vital Signs – O

    Exemplary – 2
    points
    Includes all 8 vital
    signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature (with
    Fahrenheit or Celsius
    and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Distinguished – 1.5
    points
    Includes at least 6
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes at least 4
    vital signs, (BP (with
    patient position), HR,
    RR, temperature
    (with Fahrenheit or
    Celsius and route of
    temperature
    collection), weight,
    height, BMI (or
    percentiles for
    pediatric population)
    and pain.).

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    2 points

    Labs,
    Diagnostic
    Tests and
    Screening Tools
    – O

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools that
    should be completed
    for identified patient
    that are based on the
    US clinical guidelines
    OR acknowledges no
    labs/diagnostic tests
    are recommended.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    that should be
    completed the
    identified patient but
    they do not follow the
    US clinical
    guidelines.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes a list of the
    labs, diagnostic tests,
    or screening tools
    reviewed for the
    identified patient but
    they are inappropriate
    or do not address the
    patient's problem.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Medications-S

    Exemplary – 4
    points
    Includes a list of all of
    the patient reported
    psychiatric and
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name, dose,
    route, frequency).

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes a list of all
    of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and but omits the
    medical medications
    and the diagnosis for
    the medication
    (including name,
    dose, route,
    frequency).

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes a list of
    some of the patient
    reported psychiatric
    and/or medical
    medications and the
    diagnosis for the
    medication (omits the
    dose, route,
    frequency of the
    medications).

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    4 points

    Past Medical
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes
    (Major/Chronic,
    Trauma,

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes each
    medical diagnosis but
    does not include year
    of diagnosis or

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, year of
    diagnosis and whether
    the diagnosis is active
    or current.

    Hospitalizations), for
    each medical
    diagnosis, either year
    of diagnosis OR
    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    whether the diagnosis
    is active or current.

    Past Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis and.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (omits
    addiction treatment),
    year of diagnosis.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Includes (Outpatient
    and Hospitalizations),
    for each psychiatric
    diagnosis (including
    addiction treatment),
    does not include the
    year of diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    Family
    Psychiatric
    History-S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    6 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history of
    suicidal attempts.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    4 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes an
    assessment of at least
    2 family members
    regarding, at a
    minimum, genetic
    disorders, mood
    disorder, bipolar
    disorder and history
    of suicidal attempts.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Social History-
    S

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Distinguished Includes
    all 11 of the following:
    tobacco use, drug use,
    alcohol use, marital
    status, employment
    status, current and
    previous occupation,
    sexual orientation,
    sexually active,
    contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes at least 8 of
    the following:
    tobacco use, drug
    use, alcohol use,
    marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes all 6 of the
    following: tobacco
    use, drug use, alcohol
    use, marital status,
    employment status,
    current and previous
    occupation, sexual
    orientation, sexually
    active, contraceptive
    use/pregnancy status,
    and living situation.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    3 points

    Mental Status
    Exam-O

    Exemplary – 12-15
    points
    Includes all 10
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and judgement)
    with detailed
    descriptions for each
    area.

    Distinguished – 8-11
    points
    Includes all 8
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    detailed descriptions
    for each area.

    Developing – 4-
    7 points
    Includes >6
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) with
    some descriptions for
    each area.

    Novice – 0-3 points
    Includes <3
    components of the
    mental status exam
    (appearance,
    attitude/behavior,
    mood, affect, speech,
    thought process,
    thought content/
    perception, cognition,
    insight and
    judgement) OR
    detailed descriptions
    is not included for
    each area.

    15
    points

    Primary
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 5-6
    points
    Includes a clear
    outline of the accurate
    principal diagnosis
    based on DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR criteria.

    Distinguished – 3-4
    points
    Includes an
    inaccurate diagnosis
    as the principal
    diagnosis based on
    DSM5 or DSM5-TR
    criteria.

    Developing – 1-2
    point
    Includes a medical
    diagnosis based as the
    principal diagnosis
    OR the diagnosis is
    not a DSM5 or
    DSM5-TR diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    6 points

    Differential
    Diagnoses-A

    Exemplary – 3
    points
    Includes at least 2
    differential diagnoses
    for the principal
    diagnosis.

    Distinguished – 2
    points
    Includes 2 differential
    diagnoses for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Developing – 1 point
    Includes 1 differential
    diagnosis for the
    principal diagnosis.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing. 3 points

    Treatment

    Exemplary – 11-15
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for each
    of the diagnoses listed
    under “assessment”.
    The plan includes
    ALL of the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration. If
    the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Distinguished – 6-10
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4-7 of
    the following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    For non-
    pharmacological
    treatment, includes:
    treatment name,
    frequency, duration.
    If the diagnosis is a
    chronic problem,
    student includes
    instructions on
    currently prescribed
    medications as above.

    Developing – 1-5
    points
    Includes a detailed
    pharmacologic and
    non pharmacological
    treatment plan for
    each of the diagnoses
    listed under
    “assessment”. The
    plan includes 4 of the
    following:
    drug/vitamin/herbal
    name, dose, route,
    frequency, duration
    and cost as well as
    education related to
    pharmacologic agent.
    Non-pharmacological
    treatment NOT
    included. If the
    diagnosis is a chronic
    problem, student
    includes instructions
    on currently
    prescribed
    medications as above.

    Novice – 0 point
    Information is
    completely missing.

    15
    points

    Referral

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Provides a detailed list
    of medical and other
    interdisciplinary
    referrals or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other
    interdisciplinary
    referral or documents
    NO REFERRAL
    ADVISED AT THIS
    TIME. Includes a
    timeline for follow up
    appointments.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Provides a medical or
    other interdisciplinary
    referral. DOES NOT
    include a timeline for
    follow up
    appointments.

    Novice – 0 points
    Information is
    completely missing.

    5 points

    APA
    Formatting

    Exemplary – 4-5
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work.
    Exceptional use of
    citations and extended
    referencing. High level
    of precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Distinguished – 3
    points
    Effectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    Moderate level of
    precision with APA
    7th Edition writing
    style.

    Developing – 1-2
    points
    Ineffectively uses
    literature and other
    resources to inform
    their work. Moderate
    use of citations and
    extended referencing.
    APA 7th Edition
    writing style not
    strictly adhered to.

    Novice – 0 points
    APA style and writing
    mechanics not used.

    5 points

    Total Points 90

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Newtechnology.docx **## Newtechnology.docx** New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Newtechnology.docx

    **## Newtechnology.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

    **## Newtechnology.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] HEALTH ASSESSMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Reflection questions ## 1. The patient was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. What social determinants of health (SDOH) should the nurse assess for that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? ## 2. What are some environmental and/or individual factors that could imp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Reflection questions
    ## 1. The patient was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. What social determinants of health (SDOH) should the nurse assess for that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management?
    ## 2. What are some environmental and/or individual factors that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management?
    ## 3. Draft one question you have regarding the topic/content of the simulation to have answered in class.

  • [Solved] Week 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attached – ## week6.docx **## week6.docx** Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post. Article:Impact of **Crisis** **Care** on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disabil…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attached

    – ## week6.docx

    **## week6.docx**

    Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post.

    Article:Impact of
    **Crisis** **Care** on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review  • 2024

    Introduction:
    **Crisis** intervention aims to prevent hospital admissions by providing rapid assessment and intensive support in the community. Interest is growing in the potential of
    **crisis** **care** for people with intellectual disabilities who often have co-occurring psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors. They are at high risk for admission to…

    **Author:** Yik Long Tai • Borbala Vegh • Tamara Ondruskova • Leila Hamza • Afia Ali • Angela Hassiotis

    **Source:** Journal of Mental Health
    **Research** in Intellectual Disabilities

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2024.2310033](https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2024.2310033)

    **## week6.docx**

    Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post.

    Article:Impact of
    **Crisis** **Care** on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review  • 2024

    Introduction:
    **Crisis** intervention aims to prevent hospital admissions by providing rapid assessment and intensive support in the community. Interest is growing in the potential of
    **crisis** **care** for people with intellectual disabilities who often have co-occurring psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors. They are at high risk for admission to…

    **Author:** Yik Long Tai • Borbala Vegh • Tamara Ondruskova • Leila Hamza • Afia Ali • Angela Hassiotis

    **Source:** Journal of Mental Health
    **Research** in Intellectual Disabilities

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2024.2310033](https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2024.2310033)

  • [Solved] Assessment 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or you observed from the Sentinel U – Interprofessional Collaboration simulation. Expand All ## **Introduction** Leadership and collaboration are critical aspects of a nurse’s work. The use of effective lead…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or you observed from the Sentinel U – Interprofessional Collaboration simulation.
    Expand All
    ## **Introduction**
    Leadership and collaboration are critical aspects of a nurse’s work. The use of effective leadership skills and interprofessional collaboration allow practitioners to share their perspectives in guiding patient care for the purposes of promoting optimal health and well-being. This can only be achieved when individuals have a true perception of who they are as a person.
    Reflection is a key part of building leadership skills and interprofessional relationships. It allows you to look critically at experiences and actions through specific lenses. Reflection can help you consider potential reasons and causes of people’s actions and behaviors and allow you to think about how to respond appropriately. This is vital because nurses are often at the frontlines of interacting with various other disciplines and are considered full partners when approaching healthcare of patients.
    As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the What is Reflective Practice? activity. The activity consists of five questions that will allow you the opportunity to practice self-reflection. The information gained from completing this formative will help with your success on the Collaboration and Leadership Reflection assessment. Completing formative assessments or activities is also a way to demonstrate course engagement.
    ## **Professional Context**
    This assessment is designed to help you become a reflective practitioner. By reflecting on your leadership style, along with the styles you’ve observed in others, you will learn to continually assess and improve your leadership and collaboration skills.
    You may choose to reflect on a collaborative interprofessional experience in a current or former place of practice, or you may choose to imagine yourself in the five short modules in the Sentinel U – Interprofessional Collaboration simulation.
    ## **Instructions**
    ### **Part 1: Create a one-page infographic resume of your current strengths as a leader**
    Briefly describe your leadership style. Create a short, one-page infographic resume or poster to advertise your strengths. You can use an online tool or simply use the graphics capabilities of Word to create your infographic.
    Here's an example:
    – [Infographic Resume Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49018/files/8786826/download).
    ### **Part 2: Write a two-page reflection**
    Reflect on the leadership styles you’ve observed in others, as well as an interprofessional collaboration experience from your personal practice. (If you’re having a hard time coming up with an example from your own experience, complete the five short modules in the Sentinel U – Interprofessional Collaboration simulation). What did or would effective leadership look like? What did or would effective collaboration look like? Remember that leadership can be demonstrated by those who aren’t in official leadership positions as well as by formal leaders.
    Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
    – Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes, and how effective leadership, or a lack of it, played a role. This may be the Sentinel U simulation on Interprofessional Collaboration. There are five modules in this simulation
    – A simplified gap-analysis approach may be useful:
    – What happened?
    – What went well?
    – What did not go well?
    – What should have happened?
    – Compare and contrast effective leadership with ineffective leadership. What have you observed in others that works or doesn’t work when it comes to leadership?
    – Given what you’ve shared about effective leadership and also what effective collaboration looks like, identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one article from the literature.
    – Also identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one article from the literature.
    – What leadership style do you think you need to develop more to support the above best-practice strategies you’ve described? How would you do that?
    – Include a full reference list from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, adhering to APA format.
    You will also be required to submit an APA-formatted reference list for any sources that you cited or used to inform your reflection.
    ## **Additional Requirements**
    – **Length of submission:** Part 1 is a one-page infographic resume consisting of bullet points and a few sentences. Part 2 is two pages in length double-spaced, not including the reference page.
    – **References:** Per the instructions above, cite at least 3 professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions and proposals you make. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.
    – **APA reference page:** Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources used to develop the content. You may wish to refer to the [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586) for more information on applying APA style.
    ## **Competencies Measured**
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
    – Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    – Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
    – Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively, citing the work of at least one article in the presentation.
    – Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    – Describe one's leadership style.
    – Compare and contrast effective leadership with ineffective leadership.
    – Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing the work of at least one article in the presentation.
    – Describe a leadership style to develop to better support best-practice strategies.
    – Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    – The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
    \
    cf_infographic_resume_example.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-infographic-resume-example-pdf "cf_infographic_resume_example.pdf")

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx – ## CaseStudy2-Respiratory.pdf – ## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf **## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx** **Case Study 1 and 2 Due end of week 3 at 23:59** Completion requirements **Opened:** Monday, July 14, 2025, 12:01 AM **Due:** Saturday, …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx

    – ## CaseStudy2-Respiratory.pdf

    – ## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf

    **## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx**

    **Case Study 1 and 2 Due end of week 3 at 23:59**

    Completion requirements

    **Opened:** Monday, July 14, 2025, 12:01 AM

    **Due:** Saturday, July 19, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

    Case Study 1 & 2 topics change every semester. Topics will be determined at due time for this semester

    The answers must be in your own words with reference to the journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer. Do not copy-paste or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.

    Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

    **All answers to case studies must-have reference cited in the text for each answer and a minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (No websites)  per case Study**

    **## CaseStudy2-Respiratory.pdf**

    Case Study: Respiratory Infection
    Patient Information:

    • Name: Sarah Smith
    • Age: 25
    • Gender: Female
    • Occupation: Teacher
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: Sarah Smith presents to the clinic with complaints of cough, fever, and
    difficulty breathing for the past week. She reports a productive cough with yellowish-green
    sputum and chest tightness.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 110/70 mmHg, HR 90 bpm, RR 20 breaths/min, Temp 101.2°F
    • General: Alert and oriented, appears ill
    • Respiratory: Decreased breath sounds and crackles heard bilaterally on auscultation
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Complete Blood Count (CBC): Elevated white blood cell count (WBC) with left shift
    • Chest X-ray: Infiltrates in bilateral lower lung fields consistent with pneumonia
    •

    Diagnosis: Sarah Smith is diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia based on her clinical
    presentation, physical examination findings, and radiological evidence.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia?
    2. Describe the typical findings on physical examination and chest X-ray in patients with

    pneumonia.
    3. What are the most common pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia, and

    how would you choose empirical antibiotic therapy in this patient?
    4. Discuss the management of community-acquired pneumonia, including non-

    pharmacological measures and potential complications to monitor for.

    **## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf**

    Case Study: Iron Deficiency Anemia
    Patient Information:

    • Name: John Doe
    • Age: 35
    • Gender: Male
    • Occupation: Construction Worker
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: John Doe presents to the clinic with complaints of fatigue, weakness,
    and shortness of breath on exertion for the past few months. He reports feeling unusually tired,
    even after a full night's sleep, and has noticed increased paleness of his skin and conjunctiva.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 120/80 mmHg, HR 80 bpm, RR 16 breaths/min, Temp 98.6°F
    • General: Pale skin and conjunctiva, fatigue apparent
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Respiratory: Clear lung fields bilaterally
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Hemoglobin (Hb): 9.5 g/dL (Normal range: 13.5-17.5 g/dL)
    • Hematocrit (Hct): 29% (Normal range: 40-50%)
    • Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV): 75 fL (Normal range: 80-100 fL)
    • Serum Iron: 25 mcg/dL (Normal range: 60-170 mcg/dL)
    • Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC): 400 mcg/dL (Normal range: 250-450 mcg/dL)
    • Ferritin: 10 ng/mL (Normal range: 30-400 ng/mL)

    Diagnosis: John Doe is diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia based on his clinical presentation,
    physical examination findings, and laboratory results.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of iron deficiency anemia?
    2. Explain the laboratory findings in John Doe's case and how they support the diagnosis of

    iron deficiency anemia.
    3. What are the potential causes of iron deficiency anemia in adults, and how would you

    approach further investigations in this patient?
    4. Discuss the treatment options for iron deficiency anemia, including dietary

    recommendations and pharmacological interventions.

    **## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf**

    Case Study: Iron Deficiency Anemia
    Patient Information:

    • Name: John Doe
    • Age: 35
    • Gender: Male
    • Occupation: Construction Worker
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: John Doe presents to the clinic with complaints of fatigue, weakness,
    and shortness of breath on exertion for the past few months. He reports feeling unusually tired,
    even after a full night's sleep, and has noticed increased paleness of his skin and conjunctiva.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 120/80 mmHg, HR 80 bpm, RR 16 breaths/min, Temp 98.6°F
    • General: Pale skin and conjunctiva, fatigue apparent
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Respiratory: Clear lung fields bilaterally
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Hemoglobin (Hb): 9.5 g/dL (Normal range: 13.5-17.5 g/dL)
    • Hematocrit (Hct): 29% (Normal range: 40-50%)
    • Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV): 75 fL (Normal range: 80-100 fL)
    • Serum Iron: 25 mcg/dL (Normal range: 60-170 mcg/dL)
    • Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC): 400 mcg/dL (Normal range: 250-450 mcg/dL)
    • Ferritin: 10 ng/mL (Normal range: 30-400 ng/mL)

    Diagnosis: John Doe is diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia based on his clinical presentation,
    physical examination findings, and laboratory results.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of iron deficiency anemia?
    2. Explain the laboratory findings in John Doe's case and how they support the diagnosis of

    iron deficiency anemia.
    3. What are the potential causes of iron deficiency anemia in adults, and how would you

    approach further investigations in this patient?
    4. Discuss the treatment options for iron deficiency anemia, including dietary

    recommendations and pharmacological interventions.

    **## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx**

    **Case Study 1 and 2 Due end of week 3 at 23:59**

    Completion requirements

    **Opened:** Monday, July 14, 2025, 12:01 AM

    **Due:** Saturday, July 19, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

    Case Study 1 & 2 topics change every semester. Topics will be determined at due time for this semester

    The answers must be in your own words with reference to the journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer. Do not copy-paste or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.

    Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

    **All answers to case studies must-have reference cited in the text for each answer and a minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (No websites)  per case Study**

    **## CaseStudy2-Respiratory.pdf**

    Case Study: Respiratory Infection
    Patient Information:

    • Name: Sarah Smith
    • Age: 25
    • Gender: Female
    • Occupation: Teacher
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: Sarah Smith presents to the clinic with complaints of cough, fever, and
    difficulty breathing for the past week. She reports a productive cough with yellowish-green
    sputum and chest tightness.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 110/70 mmHg, HR 90 bpm, RR 20 breaths/min, Temp 101.2°F
    • General: Alert and oriented, appears ill
    • Respiratory: Decreased breath sounds and crackles heard bilaterally on auscultation
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Complete Blood Count (CBC): Elevated white blood cell count (WBC) with left shift
    • Chest X-ray: Infiltrates in bilateral lower lung fields consistent with pneumonia
    •

    Diagnosis: Sarah Smith is diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia based on her clinical
    presentation, physical examination findings, and radiological evidence.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia?
    2. Describe the typical findings on physical examination and chest X-ray in patients with

    pneumonia.
    3. What are the most common pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia, and

    how would you choose empirical antibiotic therapy in this patient?
    4. Discuss the management of community-acquired pneumonia, including non-

    pharmacological measures and potential complications to monitor for.

    **## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf**

    Case Study: Iron Deficiency Anemia
    Patient Information:

    • Name: John Doe
    • Age: 35
    • Gender: Male
    • Occupation: Construction Worker
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: John Doe presents to the clinic with complaints of fatigue, weakness,
    and shortness of breath on exertion for the past few months. He reports feeling unusually tired,
    even after a full night's sleep, and has noticed increased paleness of his skin and conjunctiva.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 120/80 mmHg, HR 80 bpm, RR 16 breaths/min, Temp 98.6°F
    • General: Pale skin and conjunctiva, fatigue apparent
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Respiratory: Clear lung fields bilaterally
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Hemoglobin (Hb): 9.5 g/dL (Normal range: 13.5-17.5 g/dL)
    • Hematocrit (Hct): 29% (Normal range: 40-50%)
    • Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV): 75 fL (Normal range: 80-100 fL)
    • Serum Iron: 25 mcg/dL (Normal range: 60-170 mcg/dL)
    • Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC): 400 mcg/dL (Normal range: 250-450 mcg/dL)
    • Ferritin: 10 ng/mL (Normal range: 30-400 ng/mL)

    Diagnosis: John Doe is diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia based on his clinical presentation,
    physical examination findings, and laboratory results.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of iron deficiency anemia?
    2. Explain the laboratory findings in John Doe's case and how they support the diagnosis of

    iron deficiency anemia.
    3. What are the potential causes of iron deficiency anemia in adults, and how would you

    approach further investigations in this patient?
    4. Discuss the treatment options for iron deficiency anemia, including dietary

    recommendations and pharmacological interventions.

    **## CaseStudy1and2Dueendofweek3at23.docx**

    **Case Study 1 and 2 Due end of week 3 at 23:59**

    Completion requirements

    **Opened:** Monday, July 14, 2025, 12:01 AM

    **Due:** Saturday, July 19, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

    Case Study 1 & 2 topics change every semester. Topics will be determined at due time for this semester

    The answers must be in your own words with reference to the journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer. Do not copy-paste or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.

    Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

    **All answers to case studies must-have reference cited in the text for each answer and a minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (No websites)  per case Study**

    **## CaseStudy2-Respiratory.pdf**

    Case Study: Respiratory Infection
    Patient Information:

    • Name: Sarah Smith
    • Age: 25
    • Gender: Female
    • Occupation: Teacher
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: Sarah Smith presents to the clinic with complaints of cough, fever, and
    difficulty breathing for the past week. She reports a productive cough with yellowish-green
    sputum and chest tightness.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 110/70 mmHg, HR 90 bpm, RR 20 breaths/min, Temp 101.2°F
    • General: Alert and oriented, appears ill
    • Respiratory: Decreased breath sounds and crackles heard bilaterally on auscultation
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Complete Blood Count (CBC): Elevated white blood cell count (WBC) with left shift
    • Chest X-ray: Infiltrates in bilateral lower lung fields consistent with pneumonia
    •

    Diagnosis: Sarah Smith is diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia based on her clinical
    presentation, physical examination findings, and radiological evidence.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia?
    2. Describe the typical findings on physical examination and chest X-ray in patients with

    pneumonia.
    3. What are the most common pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia, and

    how would you choose empirical antibiotic therapy in this patient?
    4. Discuss the management of community-acquired pneumonia, including non-

    pharmacological measures and potential complications to monitor for.

    **## CaseStudy1-Irondeficiencyanemia2024.pdf**

    Case Study: Iron Deficiency Anemia
    Patient Information:

    • Name: John Doe
    • Age: 35
    • Gender: Male
    • Occupation: Construction Worker
    • Medical History: No significant medical history reported.

    Presenting Complaint: John Doe presents to the clinic with complaints of fatigue, weakness,
    and shortness of breath on exertion for the past few months. He reports feeling unusually tired,
    even after a full night's sleep, and has noticed increased paleness of his skin and conjunctiva.

    Physical Examination Findings:

    • Vital Signs: BP 120/80 mmHg, HR 80 bpm, RR 16 breaths/min, Temp 98.6°F
    • General: Pale skin and conjunctiva, fatigue apparent
    • Cardiovascular: Regular rhythm, no murmurs or abnormal sounds
    • Respiratory: Clear lung fields bilaterally
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly
    • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal motor and sensory functions

    Laboratory Investigations:

    • Hemoglobin (Hb): 9.5 g/dL (Normal range: 13.5-17.5 g/dL)
    • Hematocrit (Hct): 29% (Normal range: 40-50%)
    • Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV): 75 fL (Normal range: 80-100 fL)
    • Serum Iron: 25 mcg/dL (Normal range: 60-170 mcg/dL)
    • Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC): 400 mcg/dL (Normal range: 250-450 mcg/dL)
    • Ferritin: 10 ng/mL (Normal range: 30-400 ng/mL)

    Diagnosis: John Doe is diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia based on his clinical presentation,
    physical examination findings, and laboratory results.

    Questions for Students:

    1. What are the common signs and symptoms of iron deficiency anemia?
    2. Explain the laboratory findings in John Doe's case and how they support the diagnosis of

    iron deficiency anemia.
    3. What are the potential causes of iron deficiency anemia in adults, and how would you

    approach further investigations in this patient?
    4. Discuss the treatment options for iron deficiency anemia, including dietary

    recommendations and pharmacological interventions.

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3