My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] 611 discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## 611discussion1.docx **## 611discussion1.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/611-discussion-1)**_Past Experience_** I work on a peds Oncology hematology floor. Describe your experience in the utilization of nursing research in your clinical practice. **Submission Instructions:** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## 611discussion1.docx

    **## 611discussion1.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/611-discussion-1)**_Past Experience_**

    I work on a peds Oncology hematology floor.

    Describe your experience in the utilization of nursing research in your clinical practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    ## image1.png

    **## 611discussion1.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/611-discussion-1)**_Past Experience_**

    I work on a peds Oncology hematology floor.

    Describe your experience in the utilization of nursing research in your clinical practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Nursing NUR 505 Module 2 Assignment Module 4 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    NUR 505 Module 2 Assignment _**Cultural Interview Assignment**_ NUR 505 Module 4 Assignment _**Preparing Interview Questions for "A Cultural Interview" Assignment**_

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    NUR 505 Module 2 Assignment
    _**Cultural Interview Assignment**_
    NUR 505 Module 4 Assignment
    _**Preparing Interview Questions for "A Cultural Interview" Assignment**_

  • [Solved] CAPSTONE PART 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: DEPRESSION PICOT QUESTION: In older adults residing in long-term care facilities with symptoms of depression (P), does participation in structured group-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions (I), compared to routine social activities alone (C), reduce depressive symptoms and impro…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: DEPRESSION
    PICOT QUESTION: In older adults residing in long-term care facilities with symptoms of depression (P), does participation in structured group-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions (I), compared to routine social activities alone (C), reduce depressive symptoms and improve mood (O) over a 12-week period (T)?
    EACH SECTION MUST HAVE BOLD LETTER TO BE ABLE TO MY INSTRUCTIONS IDENTIFY EACH SECTION COMPLETED
    REQUIREMENTS:
    1. Title Page
    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:
    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.
    -Introduce the topic of the assignment
    -Describe the health problem. DON'T TYPE "Introduction.”
    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem.
    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program.
    -Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT QUESTION but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing (if appropriate to your question).
    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and (sometimes) time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C – Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe
    4. Describe the vulnerable population
    -Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.
    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)
    6. Proposal
    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.
    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.
    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.
    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. ( IN THIS CASE IS -Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring)
    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth
    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format
    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.
    -This section should be 3 pages long (not including the title and reference page).
     -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.
     -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.
    – NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM IS ALLOWED
    DUE DATE JULY 4, 2025, NO LATER

  • [Solved] Ethics in a Nursing Program and in Practice.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Compare and examine the consequences of an unethical behaviors in a nursing Master’s program, INCLUDING PLAGIARISM, and in the nursing practice by providing AT LEAST one example for each.** Please include 250-300 words in your initial posting by Wednesday night in APA Style 7th Ed. Then, answer tw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Compare and examine the consequences of an  unethical behaviors in a nursing Master’s program, INCLUDING  PLAGIARISM, and in the nursing practice by providing AT LEAST one  example for each.**
    Please include 250-300 words in your initial posting by Wednesday  night in APA Style 7th Ed. Then, answer two classmates (with 150 words)  by Saturday at 23:59.  Please include scholarly references.

  • [Solved] Nursing NUR 504 Assignment #3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR504Assignment3.docx **## NUR504Assignment3.docx** **_Presentation: Realistic Clinical Case Study_** For this assignment, you will develop a presentation on a realistic clinical case on a topic that is of interest to you. And then, use **Canvas Studio's Screen Capture** feature to record (voi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR504Assignment3.docx

    **## NUR504Assignment3.docx**

    **_Presentation: Realistic Clinical Case Study_**

    For this assignment, you will develop a presentation on a realistic clinical case on a topic that is of interest to you. And then, use
    **Canvas Studio's Screen Capture** feature to record (voice-over) your presentation.

    [How do I record a Canvas Studio video with a webcam in a course?Links to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-14265-50736850213) **I WILL COAMPLETE THE VIDEO PART**

    **Content Requirements** You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information that will be covering the following:

    1.
    **Subjective data:** Chief Complaint; History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem; Review of Systems (ROS)

    2.
    **Objective data:** Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family history; Past surgical history; Social history; Labs; Vital signs; Physical exam.

    3.
    **Assessment:** Primary Diagnosis; Differential diagnosis

    4.
    **Plan:** Diagnostic testing; Pharmacologic treatment plan; Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; Anticipatory guidance (primary prevention strategies); Follow up plan.

    5.
    **Other:** Incorporation of current clinical guidelines; Integration of research articles; Role of the Nurse practitioner

    **Please make sure that is not similar to other assignments submitted before!!! Thank youuuuuuu**

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides and less than 5 minutes in length.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    **## NUR504Assignment3.docx**

    **_Presentation: Realistic Clinical Case Study_**

    For this assignment, you will develop a presentation on a realistic clinical case on a topic that is of interest to you. And then, use
    **Canvas Studio's Screen Capture** feature to record (voice-over) your presentation.

    [How do I record a Canvas Studio video with a webcam in a course?Links to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-14265-50736850213) **I WILL COAMPLETE THE VIDEO PART**

    **Content Requirements** You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information that will be covering the following:

    1.
    **Subjective data:** Chief Complaint; History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem; Review of Systems (ROS)

    2.
    **Objective data:** Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family history; Past surgical history; Social history; Labs; Vital signs; Physical exam.

    3.
    **Assessment:** Primary Diagnosis; Differential diagnosis

    4.
    **Plan:** Diagnostic testing; Pharmacologic treatment plan; Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; Anticipatory guidance (primary prevention strategies); Follow up plan.

    5.
    **Other:** Incorporation of current clinical guidelines; Integration of research articles; Role of the Nurse practitioner

    **Please make sure that is not similar to other assignments submitted before!!! Thank youuuuuuu**

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.

    · The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides and less than 5 minutes in length.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

  • [Solved] Follow the instructions attached, support your response with references no older than 5 years old,.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LgVrfEQWE8 – ## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx – DNPEssentials.pdf **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-suppor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LgVrfEQWE8

    – ## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx

    – DNPEssentials.pdf

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    **## Statisticweek3-Epidemiologic_Principles_Worksheet_Guidelines-25.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/follow-the-instructions-attached-support-your-response-with-references-no-older-than-5-years-old)**Doctor of Nursing Practice Program**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **DNP7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences**

    **Epidemiologic Principles Worksheet Guidelines and Grading Rubric**

    **Purpose**
    The purpose of this assignment is to help you to begin to understand and apply the important counts, ratios, and statistics presented in healthcare and epidemiological research. Remember to use the list of formulas presented prior to the problems and to carefully consider the purpose of each calculation and how it is interpreted.
    **Also, do not forget the importance of the proper denominator such as per 100, per 1,000, per 10,000 etc.**
    **Course Outcomes**
    · Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health.

    · Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.

    · Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice.

    **Points**

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    **Due Date**

    Submit your completed worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time

    **Requirements**
    1. Complete the Risk Calculation Worksheet.

    2. For each question, identify the correct answer.

    3. Submit the worksheet to the Moodle by Saturday of week #3 at midnight Eastern Time
    **Preparing the Worksheet**
    The following are best practices for preparing this assignment:

    1. Prior to completing this worksheet, review the lessons, reading and course text up to this point. Also review the tables of calculations.

    2. Each question is worth 5 points.

    3. There is only one right answer for each of the 10 problems.

    4. You will upload the completed worksheet to the Moodle.

    **Epidemiological Formulas and Statistics**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Parameter** | **Definition** | **Formula** |
    | **Incidence (exposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were exposed | number (exposed with disease)/total number of exposed |
    | **Incidence (unexposed)** | Incidence of new cases of disease in persons who were not exposed | number (unexposed with disease)/total number of unexposed |
    | **Incidence of Disease** | Measure of risk: Total number in a population with a disease divided by the total number of the population | Number with the disease/ total population number |
    | **Relative Risk** | Risk of disease in one group versus another: Risk of developing a disease after exposure. If this number is 1, it means there is no risk. R(exposed)/Risk (unexposed) | (# exposed with disease[divided by]/total of all exposed) <br>(# of unexposed with disease/[divided by]total of all <br>unexposed) |
    | **Odds Ratio** | A measure of exposure and disease outcome commonly used in case control studies | R(exposed) / <br>R (unexposed)<br>1- R(exposed) 1-R(unexposed) |
    | **Prevalence** | The number of cases of a disease in a given time regardless of when it began (new and old cases) | (Persons with the disease/ Total population) X 1000 |
    | **Attributable Risk** | The difference in disease in those exposed and unexposed and is calculated from prospective data; directly attributed to exposure (if exposure is gone, disease would be gone) | R(exposed) – R(unexposed) |
    | **Crude Birth Rate** | The number of live births per 1,000 people in the population | (# of births/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Crude Death Rate** | The number of deaths per 1,000 people in the population | (# of deaths/estimated midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Fetal Death Rate** | The number of fetal deaths (20 weeks or more gestation) per 1,000 live births | (# of fetal deaths/ # of live births + fetal deaths) X 1000 |
    | **Annual Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease or can be all causes per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths of all causes (or a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Cause Specific Mortality Rate** | Usually an expression of a specific disease per 1,000 people for a year | (# of deaths per a specific disease)/midyear population) X 1000 |
    | **Case Fatality Rate** | The parentage of individuals who have a specific disease and die within a specific time after diagnosis | (# of persons dying from a disease after diagnosis or set period/ # of persons with the disease) X 100 |

    **Answer the following questions. Remember that there is only one right answer for each item.**

    1. The population in the city of Miami, Florida, in October 2015, was 200,000.

    The number of new cases of HIV was 28 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The number of current HIV cases was 130 between January 1 and June 30, 2015.

    The incidence rate of HIV cases for this 6-month period was

    A. 7 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 85 per 100,000 of the population.

    2. The prevalence rate of HIV cases in Miami, Florida, as of June 30, 2015, was

    A. 14 per 100,000 of the population.

    B. 28 per 100,000 of the population.

    C. 79 per 100,000 of the population.

    D. 130 per 100,000 of the population.

    3. In a North African country with a population of 5 million people, 50,000 deaths occurred during 2014. These deaths included 5,000 people from malaria out of 10,000 persons who had malaria.

    What was the total annual mortality rate for 2014 for this country? (Please show your work.)

    4. What was the cause-specific mortality rate from malaria? (Please show your work.)

    5. What was the case-fatality percentage from malaria?

    6. Fill in and total the 4 X 4 table for the following disease parameters:

    · Total number of people with lung cancer in a given population = 120

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who smoked = 90

    · Total number of people with lung cancer who did not smoke = 30

    · Total number of people who smoked = 150

    · Total number of people in the population = 350

    Fill in the missing parameters based on the above information.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | | YES, LUNG CANCER | NO, LUNG CANCER | TOTALS |
    | YES SMOKING | | | |
    | NO SMOKING | | | |
    | TOTALS | | | |

    7. From Question 6, what is the total number of people with no lung cancer?

    8. From question 6, what is the total number of people who smoked but did not have lung cancer?

    9. Set up the problem for relative risk based on the table in #6.

    10. Calculate the relative risk.

    11. Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis. (Let’s include both in discussion)
    **Directions and Grading Criteria**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Category | Points | % | Description |
    | Q1 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q2 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q3 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q4 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q5 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q6 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q7 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q8 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q9 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Q10 | 5 | 10 | Correct answer provided |
    | Total: | 50 pts | 100% | A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | DNP7200 Epidemiological Principles Worksheet Oct 18 | 1 |

    **image2.jpg**

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10352083)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx** New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx

    **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

    **NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## LiteratureReviewTheUseofClinicalSystemstoImproveOutcomesandEfficiencies.docx**

    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173825/modules/items/6934273)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

    · Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

    · Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

    · For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies)

    **The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)**

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

    · Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

    · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

    · In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Use APA format and include a title page.

    · Use the Turnitin Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

    **NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx** ### Case Case Study Analysis Study Analysis ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729) An understanding of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx

    **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

    ### Case Case Study Analysis

    Study Analysis

    ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729)

    An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    By day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 8.**

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## CaseStudyAnalysis.docx**

    ### Case Case Study Analysis

    Study Analysis

    ![A person with a rainbow colored sound wave AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20928729)

    An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174469/modules/items/7084853)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    By day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** your Case Study Analysis Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 8.**

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how obesity plays a role in the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joints, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of risk factors that may contribute to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pt |

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] NUR 611 Discussion 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NURDiscussion3.docx – 611discussion3picturetable.jpeg **## NURDiscussion3.docx** Please answer the questions below. 1. What should be included in an introductory paragraph of the research paper? 2. Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NURDiscussion3.docx

    – 611discussion3picturetable.jpeg

    **## NURDiscussion3.docx**

    Please answer the questions below.

    1. What should be included in an introductory paragraph of the research paper?

    2. Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to assess whether it includes the necessary elements of an introduction. Why and why not?

    3. How does PICOT help form a clinical question? Use Box 2.2 in your textbook to discuss population, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome and how this process helps the student arrive at a quality clinical question.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    **611discussion3picturetable.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611discussion3picturetable-jpeg)

    **611discussion3picturetable.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611discussion3picturetable-jpeg)

    **## NURDiscussion3.docx**

    Please answer the questions below.

    1. What should be included in an introductory paragraph of the research paper?

    2. Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to assess whether it includes the necessary elements of an introduction. Why and why not?

    3. How does PICOT help form a clinical question? Use Box 2.2 in your textbook to discuss population, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome and how this process helps the student arrive at a quality clinical question.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    **611discussion3picturetable.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611discussion3picturetable-jpeg)

    **## NURDiscussion3.docx**

    Please answer the questions below.

    1. What should be included in an introductory paragraph of the research paper?

    2. Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to assess whether it includes the necessary elements of an introduction. Why and why not?

    3. How does PICOT help form a clinical question? Use Box 2.2 in your textbook to discuss population, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome and how this process helps the student arrive at a quality clinical question.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    **611discussion3picturetable.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611discussion3picturetable-jpeg)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Nursing NUR 611 Week 3 Assignment 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR611Week3Assignment1.docx **## NUR611Week3Assignment1.docx** For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem. A. Conduct a search of lite…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR611Week3Assignment1.docx

    **## NUR611Week3Assignment1.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    A. Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion articles may be included.

    B. Read the peer- reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded.

    D. Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template located in
    [Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/46070/pages/module-2-lecture-materials-and-resources).

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

    **## NUR611Week3Assignment1.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    A. Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion articles may be included.

    B. Read the peer- reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded.

    D. Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template located in
    [Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/46070/pages/module-2-lecture-materials-and-resources).

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.