Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## IBelievewritingassignmentinstructions.docx
**## IBelievewritingassignmentinstructions.docx**
What do you believe about writing, communication, language, or AI in writing? In this assignment, you will create a 3 to 5 page "I Believe” essay that articulates a personal belief about writing, communication, language, or the role of AI in writing. You will express your belief through first-person narrative, drawing on personal experiences and vivid storytelling to persuade an academic audience of fellow university students who may not share your belief but are open to being persuaded.
· Belief Statement – Clearly state your belief in a single, focused sentence early in the essay.
· Personal Narrative – Use at least one well-developed personal story that illustrates the origins or significance of your belief.
· Source Integration – Incorporate at least one credible outside source (scholarly, professional, or reputable media) to situate your belief within a larger conversation about writing, communication, or AI.
· Voice & Style – Maintain a consistent first-person point of view and an authentic, engaging tone while still addressing an academic audience.
· APA Formatting- Adhere to all APA formatting guidelines and requirements
Submit
Submit a Word Document containing your assignment and the following APA requirements:
· 3 – 5 page paper
· APA Requirements
· 1” inch margins
· Times New Roman 12 pt font
· Double-Spaced
· Title Page
· Reference Page and in-text citations
· References cannot be older than 4 years old
· Must be peer reviewed articles
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
Estimated time to complete: 7 hours
Resources
Smart Student. (2020 May 11).
[How to format your paper in APA style in 2021Links to an external site.](https://youtu.be/VEqRqSsNDjc) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/VEqRqSsNDjc
Rubric
**EN304 Unit 1**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| EN304 Unit 1 |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | **20 ptsLevel 5** The assignment includes responses to all of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**16 ptsLevel 4** The assignment includes responses to most of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 3** The assignment includes responses to many of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 2** The assignment includes responses to some of the provided responses<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 1** The assignment includes responses to only a few of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Critical Thinking | **20 ptsLevel 5** Answers indicate a full understanding of each element. Answers reflect the writer’s unique perspective through an authentic and original response.<br> <br>**16 ptsLevel 4** Answers indicate an understanding of most elements with a few gaps in understanding and critical thinking. Answers provide solid, thoughtful analysis with some originality, though depth or complexity may be less developed.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 3** Answers indicate understanding of many elements with gaps in some areas of understanding. While some originality is seen, ideas may be less complex or more predictable.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 2** Answers indicate an attempt at analysis and critical thinking with significant gaps in understanding. Answers offer partial or surface-level analysis that relies on generalization or limited critical engagement.<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 1** There is almost no analysis present in the assignment. Answers show little evidence of authentic or original thinking.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality, Voice, and Writing Quality | **15 ptsLevel 5** Writing is clear, polished, and fully original. Demonstrates a strong, authentic voice and advanced command of language. Thoughtfully integrates AI-generated content as support—not as substitutes for thinking. No grammar or mechanics issues.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 4** Writing is mostly original and clear, with occasional stylistic inconsistencies. Student voice is present and thoughtful. Some over-reliance on AI phrasing, but ideas are still developed independently. Minor grammar or mechanics issues.<br> <br>**9 ptsLevel 3** Student voice is somewhat generic or hard to distinguish. Writing includes frequent paraphrased AI responses with limited reflection. Readable but includes several mechanical or clarity issues.<br> <br>**6 ptsLevel 2** Writing is dominated by AI phrasing or lacks a clear individual perspective. Voice is flat or hard to identify. Numerous grammar/mechanics issues distract from meaning.<br> <br>**3 ptsLevel 1** Minimal original thought or authorial voice present. Writing quality does not meet college standards. Has characteristics of AI-generated text with little to no integration or commentary.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** No post submitted or entirely AI-generated with no meaningful student contribution. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **10 ptsLevel 5** References and in-text citations in proper APA style are included with no errors. A title page is included that meets all the requirements of APA formatting. The sources used are highly credible and include the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 4** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-3 minor APA errors. The sources are credible and include the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**6 ptsLevel 3** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have 4-5 minor APA errors. Not all sources used are credible but each includes the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 2** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 6 errors or one of these elements is not included. There are significant gaps in the credibility of the sources and/or not all sources include a correct DOI or working links.<br> <br>**2 ptsLevel 1** The errors demonstrate limited understanding of APA title page. In-text citations and reference requirements demonstrate a limited understanding of APA requirements or sources are not used. DOIs or links are not included or they are incorrect.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 10 pts |
Total Points: 65
**## IBelievewritingassignmentinstructions.docx**
What do you believe about writing, communication, language, or AI in writing? In this assignment, you will create a 3 to 5 page "I Believe” essay that articulates a personal belief about writing, communication, language, or the role of AI in writing. You will express your belief through first-person narrative, drawing on personal experiences and vivid storytelling to persuade an academic audience of fellow university students who may not share your belief but are open to being persuaded.
· Belief Statement – Clearly state your belief in a single, focused sentence early in the essay.
· Personal Narrative – Use at least one well-developed personal story that illustrates the origins or significance of your belief.
· Source Integration – Incorporate at least one credible outside source (scholarly, professional, or reputable media) to situate your belief within a larger conversation about writing, communication, or AI.
· Voice & Style – Maintain a consistent first-person point of view and an authentic, engaging tone while still addressing an academic audience.
· APA Formatting- Adhere to all APA formatting guidelines and requirements
Submit
Submit a Word Document containing your assignment and the following APA requirements:
· 3 – 5 page paper
· APA Requirements
· 1” inch margins
· Times New Roman 12 pt font
· Double-Spaced
· Title Page
· Reference Page and in-text citations
· References cannot be older than 4 years old
· Must be peer reviewed articles
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
Estimated time to complete: 7 hours
Resources
Smart Student. (2020 May 11).
[How to format your paper in APA style in 2021Links to an external site.](https://youtu.be/VEqRqSsNDjc) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/VEqRqSsNDjc
Rubric
**EN304 Unit 1**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| EN304 Unit 1 |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | **20 ptsLevel 5** The assignment includes responses to all of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**16 ptsLevel 4** The assignment includes responses to most of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 3** The assignment includes responses to many of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 2** The assignment includes responses to some of the provided responses<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 1** The assignment includes responses to only a few of the provided prompts.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Critical Thinking | **20 ptsLevel 5** Answers indicate a full understanding of each element. Answers reflect the writer’s unique perspective through an authentic and original response.<br> <br>**16 ptsLevel 4** Answers indicate an understanding of most elements with a few gaps in understanding and critical thinking. Answers provide solid, thoughtful analysis with some originality, though depth or complexity may be less developed.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 3** Answers indicate understanding of many elements with gaps in some areas of understanding. While some originality is seen, ideas may be less complex or more predictable.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 2** Answers indicate an attempt at analysis and critical thinking with significant gaps in understanding. Answers offer partial or surface-level analysis that relies on generalization or limited critical engagement.<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 1** There is almost no analysis present in the assignment. Answers show little evidence of authentic or original thinking.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality, Voice, and Writing Quality | **15 ptsLevel 5** Writing is clear, polished, and fully original. Demonstrates a strong, authentic voice and advanced command of language. Thoughtfully integrates AI-generated content as support—not as substitutes for thinking. No grammar or mechanics issues.<br> <br>**12 ptsLevel 4** Writing is mostly original and clear, with occasional stylistic inconsistencies. Student voice is present and thoughtful. Some over-reliance on AI phrasing, but ideas are still developed independently. Minor grammar or mechanics issues.<br> <br>**9 ptsLevel 3** Student voice is somewhat generic or hard to distinguish. Writing includes frequent paraphrased AI responses with limited reflection. Readable but includes several mechanical or clarity issues.<br> <br>**6 ptsLevel 2** Writing is dominated by AI phrasing or lacks a clear individual perspective. Voice is flat or hard to identify. Numerous grammar/mechanics issues distract from meaning.<br> <br>**3 ptsLevel 1** Minimal original thought or authorial voice present. Writing quality does not meet college standards. Has characteristics of AI-generated text with little to no integration or commentary.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** No post submitted or entirely AI-generated with no meaningful student contribution. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **10 ptsLevel 5** References and in-text citations in proper APA style are included with no errors. A title page is included that meets all the requirements of APA formatting. The sources used are highly credible and include the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**8 ptsLevel 4** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-3 minor APA errors. The sources are credible and include the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**6 ptsLevel 3** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have 4-5 minor APA errors. Not all sources used are credible but each includes the correct DOI or a working link.<br> <br>**4 ptsLevel 2** A title page, in-text citations, and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 6 errors or one of these elements is not included. There are significant gaps in the credibility of the sources and/or not all sources include a correct DOI or working links.<br> <br>**2 ptsLevel 1** The errors demonstrate limited understanding of APA title page. In-text citations and reference requirements demonstrate a limited understanding of APA requirements or sources are not used. DOIs or links are not included or they are incorrect.<br> <br>**0 ptsLevel 0** The assignment was not submitted | 10 pts |
Total Points: 65