Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## EVIDENSEASSIG2.docx
**## EVIDENSEASSIG2.docx**
Using a two-step process, students will evaluate and synthesize the
external evidence results from two (2) of the strongest external studies retrieved during the search of the literature that supports the intervention of the PICOT question formulated in Week 1. These are the studies that answer the chosen PICOT question and directly relate to the chosen intervention. The studies must be
**within the discipline of nursing and not medicine.**
**Assignment Criteria:**
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. Complete the
_Evaluation Table Template_ found in the Week 3 module with the results from the two strongest
external evidence studies.
2. Pages 119-145 (5th edition) provides detailed samples of what type of information should be included in each category of the
_Evaluation Table._ Also, Section 6.1, Pages 256-258 of the text, provides a detailed narrative of what information needs to be included in each category of the
_Evaluation Table_.
3. Determine the strength of each of the two (2) studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (5th edition) page 21 and add the
_Level_ for each study
to the evaluation table. The information on the evaluation table should be in bulleted format, not sentences.
4. Include a legend on the evaluation table.
5. Place the completed
_Evaluation Table_ as an appendix.
6. Submit copies of the two selected studies with the assignment.
7. Write a one-page narrative that analyzes how the evidence from the two studies supports the intervention of the PICOT question. If the evidence does not support the intervention, describe what would be the next step in the evidence-based practice process.
8. Include a brief introduction, purpose statement and conclusion.
9. Level 1 headings required.
10. Include a title page, reference page and appendix.
11. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
12. APA 7th edition format is required.
13. The assignment does not need to be submitted to Turnitin.
14. Submit the assignment
and copies of
both studies (PDFs) by the posted due date.
X4
## image1.png
## image2.png
## image3.png
**## EVIDENSEASSIG2.docx**
Using a two-step process, students will evaluate and synthesize the
external evidence results from two (2) of the strongest external studies retrieved during the search of the literature that supports the intervention of the PICOT question formulated in Week 1. These are the studies that answer the chosen PICOT question and directly relate to the chosen intervention. The studies must be
**within the discipline of nursing and not medicine.**
**Assignment Criteria:**
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. Complete the
_Evaluation Table Template_ found in the Week 3 module with the results from the two strongest
external evidence studies.
2. Pages 119-145 (5th edition) provides detailed samples of what type of information should be included in each category of the
_Evaluation Table._ Also, Section 6.1, Pages 256-258 of the text, provides a detailed narrative of what information needs to be included in each category of the
_Evaluation Table_.
3. Determine the strength of each of the two (2) studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (5th edition) page 21 and add the
_Level_ for each study
to the evaluation table. The information on the evaluation table should be in bulleted format, not sentences.
4. Include a legend on the evaluation table.
5. Place the completed
_Evaluation Table_ as an appendix.
6. Submit copies of the two selected studies with the assignment.
7. Write a one-page narrative that analyzes how the evidence from the two studies supports the intervention of the PICOT question. If the evidence does not support the intervention, describe what would be the next step in the evidence-based practice process.
8. Include a brief introduction, purpose statement and conclusion.
9. Level 1 headings required.
10. Include a title page, reference page and appendix.
11. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
12. APA 7th edition format is required.
13. The assignment does not need to be submitted to Turnitin.
14. Submit the assignment
and copies of
both studies (PDFs) by the posted due date.
X4
## image1.png
## image2.png
## image3.png