Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • Nursing Leadership and Management Course Competencies

    Nursing Leadership and Management Course Competencies

    You will be expected to do the following to successfully complete this course:

    Integrate key nursing leadership, management, and communication concepts into collaborative practice situations.

    Explain the accountability of the nurse leader for decisions that affect health care delivery and patient outcomes.

    Apply management strategies and best practices for health care finance, human resources, and materials allocation decisions to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes.

    Apply professional standards of moral, ethical, and legal conduct in professional practice.

    Communicate in manner that is consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional.

  • Body Scans and Bottlenecks: Optimizing Hospital CT Process Flows

    Body Scans and Bottlenecks: Optimizing Hospital CT Process Flows

    1. visit case Body Scans and Bottlenecks: Optimizing Hospital CT Process Flows. Drawing from this case, please address the following: a. Draw the process flow map for the original CT scan process. b. What should Foster do? Provide one argument and one number (quantitative data) to support your answer. Reference : Body Scans and Bottlenecks: Optimizing Hospital CT Process Flows, by Sunil Chopra, Flamm Scott, Sachin Waikar, Product number: KEL592-PDF-ENG, at http://hbr.org/search/ . 2. Describe the supply chain of an organization of your choice, which was not addressed in your textbook, course cases, articles or postings. What is, in your opinion, the most important issue in managing the supply chain for this organization? 3. Revisit Harvard Business Case: dVider LLC. What changes, initiatives or strategies might dVider management implement for expanding capacity in-house (without outsourcing)? Reference:  4. Describe a concept/procedure/tool/example/case/company/situation that you remember and/or liked in to operation management course.how it could help?

  • Understanding Health Insurance

    Understanding Health Insurance A Guide to Billing and Reimbursement 
    13th edition:

    Use the blank PDF CMS-1500 Form for this assignment:   Use the same form for Exercises 11-2 and 11- 3. Download the blank PDF again and use it for Exercise 14-2.  (If you have technical issues saving the edited form, be sure you download the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader.)

    1, 
    Exercise 11-2:

    You will enter procedures in Block 24 of a CMS-1500 Claim Form.

    2. 
    Exercise 11-3:

    You will complete Block 33 with the information provided.

    3.
     Exercise 14-2:

    You will complete the Mary S. Patient Medicare Primary CMS-1500 claim (
    Exercise 14-2 on page 530
    ). Download the PDF claim form above (you won’t need to use the claim form in the Appendix as mentioned in #1 of exercise) and save it as “YourNameMarySPatient” when completed. This exercise has specific instructions, so please follow them carefully. Compare your claim with the completed claim in Figure 14-8 on page 531. Your claim should look like that before you submit it. This is a great low-stress opportunity to successfully complete a Medicare claim form!

  • Fetal Abnormality Case Study

    Fetal Abnormality Case Study

    Write an analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:

    Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.

    How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?

    What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

    This Fetal Abnormality Case Study assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

     

    Fetal Abnormality Case Study on Moral Status Rubric

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory

    0.00%

    2

    Less Than Satisfactory

    65.00%

    3

    Satisfactory

    75.00%

    4

    Good

    85.00%

    5

    Excellent

    100.00%

    70.0 %Content

     

    25.0 %Determination of Moral Status

    Theory/Theories that determine the moral status of the fetus are incorrectly identified.

    Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study, but explanation is lacking.

    Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study. Some explanation is provided.

    Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including adequate explanation.

    Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation.

    25.0 %Recommendation for Action

    Recommendation for action shows little to no relevance to the case study.

    Recommendation for action is present, but lacks explanation.

    Recommendation for action is present, with some explanation.

    Recommendation for action is present, with explanation.

    Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject.

    20.0 %Personal Response to Case Study

    Personal response to the case study shows little to no relevance, and does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

    Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree but does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

    Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and an explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

    Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

    Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

    20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     

    7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    10.0 %Format

     

    5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    Sources are not documented.

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    100 %Total Weightage

  • CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUANTITATIVE STUDY

    CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUANTITATIVE STUDY

    Introduction

    Develop a topic sentence in which you will define the purpose of the Research Critique.

    Formulate a thesis statement which briefly provides a broad indication of your point of view in composing this assignment.

    Include a summary outline to describe the organization and main topics you will include in the body paragraphs of the assignments (see below sections).

    Protection of Human Participants

    Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

    Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

    Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

    Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

     

    Data Collection

    Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

    How were data collected in this study?

    What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

    Identify the time period for data collection of the study.

    Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

     

    Data Management and Analysis

    Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.

    Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?

    What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

     

    Findings / Interpretation of Findings: Implications for Practice and Future Research

    What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

    Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

    What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

    Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

    What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the study findings be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, to a specific area of nursing?

    What suggestions are made for further studies?

     

    Conclusion

    Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement

    Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

    Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

    Integrate asummary of the knowledge learned.

     

    Reference

    Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). 
    Understanding Nursing Research
    (5
    th
    ed.).  Elsevier.  ISBN-13:  9781437707502

  • Challenges Facing Today’s Health Care Organizations Leaders

    Challenges Facing Today’s Health Care Organizations Leaders

    Choose two issues or challenges that the leaders of today’s health care organizations face. Select from among the following topics:

    Staff Shortage (Physicians, Nurses, Allied Health Providers, Ancillary Services) Reorganization in Response to Merger or Consolidation of Services Layoffs as a Result of Declining Revenues Influx of Registry, Part-Time, and Temporary Contract Staff Poor Performance Outcomes Leading to a Reduction in Medicare Reimbursement Dollars Poor Job Satisfaction Rates Resulting in Turnover

    You are the manager of an ancillary service department at a large, 500+ bed hospital. Develop a proposal (750-1,200 words) that is directed toward your staff, in which you address the following:

    Inform the staff of the two issues (from the topics provided) your organization is facing. Describe the impact of these issues on your department. Describe how improved communication, collaboration, and teamwork can improve conditions in your department. Identify at least two examples from the required or recommended readings of techniques found to foster inclusion and improve communication and collaboration. A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.

    Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

  • Economics and Decision Making in Health Care Course Competencies

    Economics and Decision Making in Health Care Course Competencies

    To successfully complete this course, you will be expected to:

    Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.

    Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.

    Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.

    Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization’s resources and its ability to provide quality care.

    Apply various communication methods in order to clearly, effectively, and efficiently relate information to stakeholders and colleagues related to economic data, findings, and strategies.

  • Proposal, Annotated Bibliography, and Literature Review Course Competencies

    Proposal, Annotated Bibliography, and Literature Review Course Competencies

    PRELIMINARY SEARCH STRATEGY

    For this project you will need to gather peer reviewed articles for your Annotated Bibliography.  A main goal in finding articles is to gather scholarly evidence to support your proposal arguments.

    Some prefer to refine their idea first and use it to inform their library search. Others prefer to start in the library databases and let their library search help refine their topic. This process is called the 
    preliminary search
    .

    Preliminary Search Strategy:

    1.  Carefully read the assignment to identify research needs.

    Here are the main research requirements of the Assessment and Surveillance Plan Project (though there may be others):

    Research Elements: Assessment and Surveillance Plan Project

     Specific health issue: 
    e.g. congestive heart failure, obesity or STDs

     Identify culture(s) and demographic(s) affected and their specific needs: 
    e.g. poverty, Asian or elderly

     Policy or policies that influence the health issue:
     e.g. vaccination requirements, insurance coverage, Older Americans Act

    You will want a nice variety of articles to establish your arguments. Relevant articles may touch on all three levels above, two out of the three, or only one element at a time. Therefore, you will need to try different search strategies to perform a thorough search.

    2.  Plan your search strategy and identify keywords. Here are some approaches for searching for scholarly articles: 

    Mix and match to try different element combinations: 
    e.g. congestive heart failure
     and poverty; obesity and (specific cultural group); restrictions and HIV

    Search on a specific condition/problem and scan articles for related policies:
     e.g. STDs and detection and public health

    Policy or policies that influence the health issue:
      e.g. vaccination requirements, insurance coverage, Older Americans Act

    You will want a nice variety of articles to establish your arguments. Relevant articles may touch on all three levels above, two out of the three, or only one element at a time. Therefore, you will need to try different search strategies perform a thorough search.

     

    3.  Think about where to find information about policy.

     

    What is a social policy?  This may be the most difficult element to find. Most social policies are not labeled with the word “policy” and they may have any of these qualities:

     Regional in scope

     National in scope

     Formal or have legal roots

     Informal – rooted in social assumption or smaller institutional regulations

    As you brainstorm for search topics, keep an eye out for articles that mention disadvantage or cultural inequalities and their relationships to health disparities. Those will be a clue that indicates a policy/disparity connection.

    LET’S WRITE YOUR PAPER, ORDER NOW.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY CHECKLIST

    Check to make sure that your Annotated Bibliography is complete using the checklist below. The more thorough your Annotated Bibliography, the more seamlessly it will transform into your paper’s literature review.

    Components of the Annotated Bibliography list:

    Lists citations to books, articles, and documents

    Comprises a variety of credible perspectives

    Formatted in APA Style

    Annotation follows each citation

    Annotations should contain some or most of the following:

    Provides the reader with more information about the content of the sources

    Consists of a paragraph that’s both a descriptive and evaluative paragraph (about 150 words)

    Offers both a description and a critical assessment of the articles or books being annotated

    Gives the reader a sense of the quality of the sources

    Gives a sense of the argumentative position of the author relative to others in the field

    Informs the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited

    Concisely exposes the author’s point of view and the clarity of the work

    Evaluates the appropriateness of expression, and authority

    Summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article

    Evaluates the authority or background of the author

    Comments on the intended audience

    Compares or contrasts this work with another you have cited

    Explains how this work illuminates your bibliography topic

     

    WE HAVE THE WRITING EXPERTS, OUR PAPERS ARE ORIGINAL WITH NO PLAGIARISM, WHY STRESS YOURSELF?

    CREATE YOUR LITERATURE REVIEW

    Informing the Literature Review

    As you prepared your Annotated Bibliography, common themes should have emerged from the articles. Your articles for your Literature Review will fall into these natural categories. This structure will help organize your use of sources as you synthesize, or pull them together, in writing. (It doesn’t matter how your sources are organized; it only matters that they are organized logically.) Usually, the citations are grouped according to common themes or the stances they share.

     

    As you write the literature review, you will synthesize, or pull together, your analysis and articles that follow similar themes. You don’t need to try to wedge all of the articles from your Annotated Bibliography inside your Literature Review paragraphs. Some sources will be less helpful in the Literature Review section of your paper but extremely helpful if reserved as evidence in other sections.

    Through your Annotated Bibliography, you have already performed the evaluation and analysis of the literature. Now, it’s time for the synthesis. Your literature review will synthesize the literature into a summary of what’s known and what’s not known.

    Your literature review will also . . .

    Review the background of the problem area – the history of the issue.

    Identify merits of previous studies (who, what, when, where, why, how)

    Explore what the field has said on the topic

    Identify areas of controversy in the literature

    Demonstrate your knowledge of the field

    Define which issues and authors are important to you and which are not

    Define where you stand in the academic conversation of your field

    Formulate questions that need further research/answers

    Performing a selective, critical literature review will help you in your professional as well as scholarly life. An evaluation of pertinent works provides good evidence for your arguments. It demonstrates that you’ve done the necessary preliminary research to undertake your project. Many grant proposals even require a literature review.

    If you find that you need help with any form of academic writing, let our academic writing experts assist you.

  • Introduction to Health Information Systems Course Competencies

    Introduction to Health Information Systems Course Competencies

    To successfully complete this course, you will be expected to:

    Apply emerging models or best practices to implement a health information system that improves operations and patient outcomes.

    Analyze administrative, clinical, management, and decision-support information technology tools.

    Conduct a comprehensive financial assessment into the implementation of an electronic health record system.

    Apply evidence to obtain buy-in from all stakeholders for implementation of an integrated electronic health record system.

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in health care administration.

  • Health Care Quality, Risk, and Regulatory Compliance Course Competencies

    Health Care Quality, Risk, and Regulatory Compliance Course Competencies

    To successfully complete this course, you will be expected to:

    Analyze research and informal information to develop a financial strategy for a health care organization.

    Manage budgets and assets in alignment with organizational directional strategy.

    Assess information technology status relative to organizational needs.

    Apply innovative thinking to develop solutions for existing and emerging IT issues within a health care organization.

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in health

    care administration.