My Blog

Tag: Constitutional, Criminal & Civil Law Analysis

  • [Solved] draft paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) I need a paper drafted by Saturday

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    I need a paper drafted by Saturday

  • [Solved] week 2 replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (1)** – ## week2replies.docx **## week2replies.docx** 100 words each reply 530 d1 reply to doug According to the United States Code Annotated [(29 U.S.C. § 623)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623), an empl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (1)**

    – ## week2replies.docx

    **## week2replies.docx**

    100 words each reply

    530 d1 reply to doug

    According to the United States Code Annotated
    [(29 U.S.C. § 623)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623), an employer may participate in age discrimination where there is a “bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary” to operate as a normal business.

    When I think about discrimination I often think about the 7 or 8 protected categories such as Race, Religion, and Sex to name a few.  However it can be in many other forms as well.  Sometimes these discriminatory policies are legal, and sometimes they can open a company up to liability.  For example, the FBI, I understand this is not a private company, but they actively practice age discrimination.  Even though I remain in excellent physical health and can out work most folks half my age, The FBI will not accept my application because I am 56 years old.  They state the reason for this is they want applicants to be able to reach 20 years of government service and retire at the mandatory retirement age of 57.  On their website they say, “Apply before your 36th birthday unless you have veteran’s preference or federal law enforcement experience.  You must be able to retire by the age of 57.  This is discriminatory on its face, but for very reasonable and legal reasons.

    So according to USC Annotated (29 U.S.C.
    [§ 623](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623)), an employer may participate in age discrimination where there is a “bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary” to operate as a normal business.  For example some cities and counties hiring practices do not actually list age requirements but they do include physical requirements that could be extremely difficult for older candidates to accomplish.  Is this discriminatory? Possibly, but it is understandable that older folks tend to develop all sorts of issues, not just strength and endurance problems but even visual acuity declination.  I have 2020 vision (thanks to PRK), but my eyes are older and do not alway “see” things as fast as one with younger eyes.  These are all concerns for agencies looking to hire older Americans.  Think about process operators in the refineries.  As part of their normal daily jobs, they have to climb 75 foot shore tanks full of petrochemicals.  They climb them to take samples and measurements.  So in cases like this, can a person who cannot climb a set of stairs be hired?  Probably not and based on 29 USC oil companies would be protected from liability.

    Taking into account your own experiences in or understanding of law enforcement, what are your thoughts regarding the Los Angeles Police Department's removal of an age requirement, given the nature of the job as a new recruit? What issues might arise?  Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    In the case of LAPD my thoughts are complex.  On the one hand as an older officer, I applaud the decision to do away with the age restriction.  If a person can pass the physical test, including strength, endurance, and agility, well then let them go for it.  However there are other issues that come along with hiring older folks.  Bones are more brittle, eyes don’t see as well at night, we are oftentimes less flexible, (mentally and physically).  It could be looked at as a trade off.  Older people usually have a bit more discipline and don’t call in sick as much, but they may use more (scheduled) sick time.  They often bring a lot more experience to the job, and in police work this is often a good thing.  But along with the amount of wisdom an older person can bring, there is always the possibility that younger officers might not be able to relate with their older counterparts.

    Not only the physical aspects, we should examine the financial topic too. For example if you are working for an agency that has the rule of 75 or 80, which means your age plus the number years of service combined makes 75, you can retire with a full pension.  The problem with hiring older people is that for them to reach this number they don’t have to work as many years as a younger person.  Therefore employers don’t get as many years out of the older employees than they do the younger ones to reach full retirement age.  So this plus the more health appointments older people may have is something employers have to look at.  Lastly, most crimes or criminal activity involve males from the age of 18-25, (I read that somewhere) and therefore older Americans may not even speak the same language or be able to get certain references or understand the current slang, making it difficult to understand and or develop rapport with the younger minded folks they are dealing with.  All of these things should be taken into consideration when hiring older people.

    ~Doug

    Levin, E. A. (2018). GENDER-NORMED PHYSICAL-ABILITY TESTS UNDER TITLE VII. Columbia Law Review, 118(2), 567-603. Retrieved from
    [https://proxy.ccis.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/gender-normed-physical-ability-tests-under-title/docview/2085676562/se-2](https://proxy.ccis.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/gender-normed-physical-ability-tests-under-title/docview/2085676562/se-2)

    Online Web Page  (2026). FBIJOBS.Org. Age requirements.
    [https://fbijobs.gov/special-agents/application-and-evaluation-process](https://fbijobs.gov/special-agents/application-and-evaluation-process)

    Online Article (2026). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Who is Protected From Employment Discrimination.
    [https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/3-who-protected-employment-discrimination](https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/3-who-protected-employment-discrimination)

    less

    530 d1 reply Daniel

    The 29 US Code 623 Prohibits age discrimination. It's illegal for an employer to refuse to hire or discriminate against any individual regarding compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of age. Employers cannot limit, segregate, or classify employees in ways that reduce employment opportunities or adversely affect their status due to age, nor reduce wages to comply with this law.

    The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered whether the forced retirement of a police officer based on budgetary constraints constitutes "subterfuge" in
    Sadie v. City of Cleveland, No. 12-3142/3143 (June 11, 2013).
    Sadie involved a City of Cleveland ordinance that provided for the mandatory retirement of firefighters and law enforcement officers at age 65.  In 2009, however, the City significantly cut the police department budget, forcing 67 officers to be laid off and another 28 officers to be demoted. The Chief of Police also received petitions from several officers, including Joseph Sadie, to continue employment after reaching age 65. The Chief denied the petitions since retirement of these officers would enable him to reinstate some of the laid off and demoted officers. The officers who were forced into retirement filed suit, claiming that the forced retirements for budgetary reasons were a subterfuge for age discrimination which evaded the purpose of the ADEA.

    In my experiences as a Police Officer I believe there should be an age requirement for recruits. A Police Officer is expected to perform arduous physical tasks under high stress. The NYPD's Job Standard Test is a physical endurance test to evaluate an applicants ability to perform physical tasks typically associated with a routine radio call or a critical incident. The Police Officer Candidate Job Standard Test is a timed event comprising six stations that, together, must be completed in four minutes and twenty-eight seconds (4:28) without stopping. The six stations of the Candidate Job Standard Test include; Fence Surmount: From a kneeling, weapon-ready position, the candidate sprints 50 feet to surmount a six-foot fence. Aside from these requirements a candidate must also Climb stairs, adapt or engage in Physical restraint, simulate a foot pursuit, rescue a victim by dragging a 175-180lb dummy for 600 feet, and shoot a gun in the middle of a circular ring, and not allow the barrel of the gun to touch the edges of the ring.

    These tasks require an agile, mobile body with less wear and tear. As one gets older, cardiovascular endurance diminishes and hormone levels naturally change, causing muscle loss and the requirement of longer recovery time after demanding physical tasks. An age requirement is not meant to discriminate against a particular age group, its meant to keep that individual and his colleagues safe.

    References

    [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623)

    https://www.devinemillimet.com/uploads/docs/enews/Labor-Employment/06-21-13/firefighter-law-enforcement-exception-to-the-ADEA.html

    https://nypdrecruit.com/pages/police-officer-training-physical-requirements

    530 d2 reply stephanie

    What types of situations would one expect to fall under this Act?

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from being targeted because of their “race, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, or sexual orientation” (OASAM, n.d., para. 1). When reviewing the archives, you can expect the following types of cases to follow under this act:

    – a supervisor or manager using racial slurs towards an employee (causes a hostile work environment).

    – being touched without consent, inappropriate comments, requests for sexual favors, or threats connected to promotions

    – being passed over for promotions, terminated, or punished because of gender, religion, age, disability, or national origin

    – harassment based on sexual orientation or identity

    – refusing accommodations for religious purposes

    – Failing to provide legally required accommodations under the Disabilities Act of 1990 (EEOC, n.d., para. 1).

    – Retaliating against employees who have filed reports of discrimination and/or participated in investigations (Newbold, 2007, p. 2).

    How might you, as a manager, avoid these situations?

    1. If I was the manager, to avoid these situations, I would ensure I created a fun, yet professional, respectful, and all-inclusive work culture. I would have an open-door policy and push open communication. I would reiterate confidentiality (what is discussed with me stays with me, unless I am bound by my position to share information).

    2. I would clearly and effectively communicate discrimination, unsolicited touching, offensive actions and comments, retaliation of any kind, or any form of harassment will not be tolerated. Those actions will result in immediate termination of employment.

    3. I would provide separate trainings that review the guidelines and policies surrounding Title VII. I would have a training on preventing harassment, to help employees recognize unacceptable. During this training I would exhibit the reporting procedures and reiterate the consequences of violating the policies. With these trainings, I would lead by example by exhibiting the same behaviors I expect from my employees. I would have a training on boundaries and confidentiality. All trainings will be repeated on an annual basis to ensure everyone knows what behavior is acceptable in the workplace.

    4. As a manager, I would respond in a reasonable and fair manner to complaints. I would document all incidents (if it’s not documented, it didn’t happen). I would take all complaints with serious concern and complete a thorough investigate while protecting the reporting person with protection from retaliation.

    5. During the hiring process, I can avoid these situations by ensuring I am hiring based on experience, credentials, and how the person fits in the company and if they are an asset to the company.

    6. When it comes to promotion, discipline, termination. and evaluation, all decisions will be based on lack of performance (making sure performance has been documented up to the point of termination). Promotion will be based on knowledge, years of service, experience, and qualifications. Qualifications don’t always have to come from having a degree; qualifications can come from years of service or experience.

    References

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (n.d.). Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Retrieved May 14, 2026, from
    [https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/titles-i-and-v-americans-disabilities-act-1990-ada](https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/titles-i-and-v-americans-disabilities-act-1990-ada)

    Newbold, M.H. (2007, March 19). When does a Petty Slight Ripen into Retaliation under Title VII? International Association of Chiefs of Police.
    [ccis.ucourses.com](https://ccis.ucourses.com/content/enforced/1053708-MSCJ_530_DEA_5-25SUMR1/Discussion%20)

    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration & Management (OASAM). (n.d.). Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved on May 14, 2026, from
    [https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-of-1964](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-of-1964)

    less

    530 d2 reply aalia

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 defines harassment as unwelcome verbal or physical conduct based on legally protected characteristics such as race, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or retaliation. However, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights provides many examples of discrimination and harassment complaints. Some of the most common forms of workplace discrimination discussed within these reports include sexual harassment, employment discrimination, and racial discrimination, all of which can negatively impact an employee’s ability to work in a safe, fair, and professional environment.

    Sexual Harassment is a form of inappropriate behavior that may include unwanted touching, seeking sexual favors, making sexual jokes, or asking intimate questions about a person’s sex life. It can also include repeatedly asking a person to go on a date after being told no or even sharing pornographic or sexual photos through email or text messages. According to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2020), the #MeToo movement examines sexual harassment in government workplaces, which includes “structural power imbalances and gender disparities” as well as “retaliation among victims of sexual harassment.” For instance, if a manager decides to make sexual comments toward an employee who declines every time, the employee will eventually feel uncomfortable around the manager, creating a hostile work environment. The employee’s refusal can also lead the manager to retaliate by denying a promotion or even by terminating the employee, which can affect the employee’s employment status. To help prevent sexual harassment from continuing, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2020) discussed implementing anti-harassment training programs to ensure that “victims are adequately protected against retaliation” and recommended that “Congress require findings of sexual harassment to be automatically referred to the Office of Special Counsel to ensure protections are enforced, and perpetrators are appropriately disciplined”.

    The Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (1997) examined employment discrimination, highlighting instances where employees were treated unfairly. The committee reported that people of color were denied employment opportunities at significantly higher rates, with males experiencing discrimination more frequently than females. Asian Americans were specifically identified as a group facing employment discrimination, particularly in cases where individuals were employed for several months but later terminated due to language barriers or differences in educational backgrounds (Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1997). These findings indicate that some companies failed to provide adequate training, workplace support, or information about employee rights during the hiring process. Although individuals from diverse racial and cultural backgrounds may be capable of performing job duties effectively, some employers appear unwilling to invest the necessary time and resources to train employees who speak other languages. This reluctance suggests a preference for hiring individuals who are fluent in English, thereby limiting opportunities for people from other races and cultures.

    Racial discrimination may manifest as either direct or indirect actions, in which employers exhibit conscious bias, prejudice, or reliance on racial stereotypes. For instance, a manager might decline to hire a Black applicant due to personal prejudice rather than evaluating the applicant’s qualifications, skills, or experience. As a manager, I would first implement a zero-tolerance policy regarding harassment and discrimination, ensuring that all employees clearly understand which behaviors are unacceptable. I would also require mandatory training to reinforce guidelines for professionalism, respect, accountability, and compliance with federal law. Additionally, I would provide employees with confidential channels to report unethical behavior without fear of retaliation. By adopting an open-door policy and encouraging supervisors to facilitate open discussions, I aim to address concerns proactively and foster a safe, trusting work environment.

    References:

    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2020, April 1). U.S. Commission on Civil Rights releases report, Federal #MeToo: Examining sexual harassment in government workplaces.
    [https://www.usccr.gov/files/press/2020/04-01-Federal-Me-Too-PR.pdf](https://www.usccr.gov/files/press/2020/04-01-Federal-Me-Too-PR.pdf)

    Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1997). Employment discrimination in Utah.
    [https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/2018/11-13-Utah-Employment-Discrimination-1997.pdf](https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/2018/11-13-Utah-Employment-Discrimination-1997.pdf)

    525 d1 reply troy

    I  believe there are a few rare cases where holding a U.S. citizen in custody without immediate judicial access might be necessary, but I would approach that idea with caution. For me, the main point is temporary. If a U.S. citizen is captured on the battlefield while fighting for enemy forces, the government may need to detain them temporarily to assess their status and ensure national security. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the government could detain a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant. However, it emphasized that the citizen still had due process rights and the opportunity to contest the detention before an impartial decision-maker. I get the need for emergency detention during war or serious national security threats, but I don’t think the government should be able to keep a citizen locked up indefinitely without court oversight.  This also connects to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld and Rasul v. Bush, because both cases show that national security does not completely erase legal protections. The Court in Hamdan rejected military commission procedures that violated federal law and Common Article 3, while in Rasul, it permitted federal courts to hear habeas petitions from Guantanamo detainees. Reichel (2017) argues that criminal justice systems mirror a nation's values, and in the U.S., one key value is the limitation of government power through due process.

    I support the ruling on the British torture-evidence issue. Evidence obtained through torture shouldn't be allowed in court, even if British officials weren't directly involved. The 2005 House of Lords case, A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ruled against using evidence obtained through torture, including that gathered by foreign officials abroad. I believe that's the right standard since using evidence still gives torture some value. It encourages countries to ignore issues while others handle the tough tasks. The U.S. should adopt a similar standard. From a practical law-enforcement perspective, torture evidence is unreliable because people will say almost anything to stop pain or fear. It undermines the justice system's legitimacy.

    References

    A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 71.
    [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051208/aand-1.htm](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051208/aand-1.htm)

    Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006).

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).

    Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    525 d1 reply Daniela

    1. We have a judicial system founded on the premise of probable cause and the right to due process. I personally don't think that any American deserves or should be held, detained, or restricted based on assumptions, bias, or other elements without legal bases. Thinking of historical events where American citizens were detained and had their movements restricted, such as the Japanese Americans during WWII. Around 120,000 people of Japanese descent and roughly 70,000 U.S. citizens were removed, relocated, and had their movement restricted pretty much equivalent to incarceration, but without recourse to the judicial system. This happened due to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, combined with a mass hysteria which led to racial prejudice and labeling of individuals as “enemy aliens” no matter of their citizenship status. Analyzing all this situation with my 2026 view, I think the decision makers were advised by scared “leaders” who influenced these decisions based on their bias and fears. The American people, even at the time, recognized this was a human rights violation, and many were appalled at the decision of the Supreme Court to uphold the decision made in Korematsu v. United States (1944) (Adachi, 2022)

    Another event in our recent history where restrictions were exchanged for supposed safety was during covid-19. At the height of covid, I had to deploy my whole battalion of almost 700 Soldiers. We had to isolate, quarantine, feed, lodge and so many more logistical elements in a world where everything and everyone has stopped. Locals where we deployed to had curfews and hefty fines were being issued if they were found on the streets before 6am or after 8pm. They had to log online to print a ticket with their destination to be able to travel outside their dwellings to avoid fines. We were lacking resources, were on lockdown in small little spaces, and many of us found out we could NEVER make it on shows like "Alone". Facilities were closed; the gyms were forever closed. A friend of mine had to quarantine three times during this stint. The quarantine protocol was 14 days, alone in a fairly remote part of the post. He texted me one day and said he ran 10 miles in that room; he told me he was going crazy. I guess that's what it means to be tortured?!

    2. Torturing someone to obtain information has been used since the dawn of civilization. Torture is still practiced in many countries to obtain confessions or to secure convictions. Of course, torture is used for more than just legal obliging methods, but I will mostly focus on this aspect. Methods such as prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, threats, and humiliation are designed to break the strongest person down. The UN Convention against Torture defines torture as: “any act that intentionally inflicts severe physical or mental pain or suffering, carried out by or with the consent of a public official, for purposes such as obtaining information, punishment, or intimidation.” (scienceinsights.org, 2026) A person under duress, threatened with or in solitary confinement, prolonged interrogation, and sleep deprived, could tell or admit to an investigator anything they are suggesting to him too. Physical torture, which I hope doesn’t happen within our police stations or other organizations that should be upholding the law, is even more evil and unconscionable.

    References

    Adachi, N. (2022). https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/legality-japanese-american-relocation. Retrieved from https://www.ebsco.com.

    scienceinsights.org. (2026, March 20). Retrieved from https://scienceinsights.org/what-is-psychological-torture-and-what-it-does-to-the-brain/.

    **## week2replies.docx**

    100 words each reply

    530 d1 reply to doug

    According to the United States Code Annotated
    [(29 U.S.C. § 623)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623), an employer may participate in age discrimination where there is a “bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary” to operate as a normal business.

    When I think about discrimination I often think about the 7 or 8 protected categories such as Race, Religion, and Sex to name a few.  However it can be in many other forms as well.  Sometimes these discriminatory policies are legal, and sometimes they can open a company up to liability.  For example, the FBI, I understand this is not a private company, but they actively practice age discrimination.  Even though I remain in excellent physical health and can out work most folks half my age, The FBI will not accept my application because I am 56 years old.  They state the reason for this is they want applicants to be able to reach 20 years of government service and retire at the mandatory retirement age of 57.  On their website they say, “Apply before your 36th birthday unless you have veteran’s preference or federal law enforcement experience.  You must be able to retire by the age of 57.  This is discriminatory on its face, but for very reasonable and legal reasons.

    So according to USC Annotated (29 U.S.C.
    [§ 623](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623)), an employer may participate in age discrimination where there is a “bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary” to operate as a normal business.  For example some cities and counties hiring practices do not actually list age requirements but they do include physical requirements that could be extremely difficult for older candidates to accomplish.  Is this discriminatory? Possibly, but it is understandable that older folks tend to develop all sorts of issues, not just strength and endurance problems but even visual acuity declination.  I have 2020 vision (thanks to PRK), but my eyes are older and do not alway “see” things as fast as one with younger eyes.  These are all concerns for agencies looking to hire older Americans.  Think about process operators in the refineries.  As part of their normal daily jobs, they have to climb 75 foot shore tanks full of petrochemicals.  They climb them to take samples and measurements.  So in cases like this, can a person who cannot climb a set of stairs be hired?  Probably not and based on 29 USC oil companies would be protected from liability.

    Taking into account your own experiences in or understanding of law enforcement, what are your thoughts regarding the Los Angeles Police Department's removal of an age requirement, given the nature of the job as a new recruit? What issues might arise?  Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    In the case of LAPD my thoughts are complex.  On the one hand as an older officer, I applaud the decision to do away with the age restriction.  If a person can pass the physical test, including strength, endurance, and agility, well then let them go for it.  However there are other issues that come along with hiring older folks.  Bones are more brittle, eyes don’t see as well at night, we are oftentimes less flexible, (mentally and physically).  It could be looked at as a trade off.  Older people usually have a bit more discipline and don’t call in sick as much, but they may use more (scheduled) sick time.  They often bring a lot more experience to the job, and in police work this is often a good thing.  But along with the amount of wisdom an older person can bring, there is always the possibility that younger officers might not be able to relate with their older counterparts.

    Not only the physical aspects, we should examine the financial topic too. For example if you are working for an agency that has the rule of 75 or 80, which means your age plus the number years of service combined makes 75, you can retire with a full pension.  The problem with hiring older people is that for them to reach this number they don’t have to work as many years as a younger person.  Therefore employers don’t get as many years out of the older employees than they do the younger ones to reach full retirement age.  So this plus the more health appointments older people may have is something employers have to look at.  Lastly, most crimes or criminal activity involve males from the age of 18-25, (I read that somewhere) and therefore older Americans may not even speak the same language or be able to get certain references or understand the current slang, making it difficult to understand and or develop rapport with the younger minded folks they are dealing with.  All of these things should be taken into consideration when hiring older people.

    ~Doug

    Levin, E. A. (2018). GENDER-NORMED PHYSICAL-ABILITY TESTS UNDER TITLE VII. Columbia Law Review, 118(2), 567-603. Retrieved from
    [https://proxy.ccis.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/gender-normed-physical-ability-tests-under-title/docview/2085676562/se-2](https://proxy.ccis.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/gender-normed-physical-ability-tests-under-title/docview/2085676562/se-2)

    Online Web Page  (2026). FBIJOBS.Org. Age requirements.
    [https://fbijobs.gov/special-agents/application-and-evaluation-process](https://fbijobs.gov/special-agents/application-and-evaluation-process)

    Online Article (2026). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Who is Protected From Employment Discrimination.
    [https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/3-who-protected-employment-discrimination](https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/3-who-protected-employment-discrimination)

    less

    530 d1 reply Daniel

    The 29 US Code 623 Prohibits age discrimination. It's illegal for an employer to refuse to hire or discriminate against any individual regarding compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of age. Employers cannot limit, segregate, or classify employees in ways that reduce employment opportunities or adversely affect their status due to age, nor reduce wages to comply with this law.

    The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered whether the forced retirement of a police officer based on budgetary constraints constitutes "subterfuge" in
    Sadie v. City of Cleveland, No. 12-3142/3143 (June 11, 2013).
    Sadie involved a City of Cleveland ordinance that provided for the mandatory retirement of firefighters and law enforcement officers at age 65.  In 2009, however, the City significantly cut the police department budget, forcing 67 officers to be laid off and another 28 officers to be demoted. The Chief of Police also received petitions from several officers, including Joseph Sadie, to continue employment after reaching age 65. The Chief denied the petitions since retirement of these officers would enable him to reinstate some of the laid off and demoted officers. The officers who were forced into retirement filed suit, claiming that the forced retirements for budgetary reasons were a subterfuge for age discrimination which evaded the purpose of the ADEA.

    In my experiences as a Police Officer I believe there should be an age requirement for recruits. A Police Officer is expected to perform arduous physical tasks under high stress. The NYPD's Job Standard Test is a physical endurance test to evaluate an applicants ability to perform physical tasks typically associated with a routine radio call or a critical incident. The Police Officer Candidate Job Standard Test is a timed event comprising six stations that, together, must be completed in four minutes and twenty-eight seconds (4:28) without stopping. The six stations of the Candidate Job Standard Test include; Fence Surmount: From a kneeling, weapon-ready position, the candidate sprints 50 feet to surmount a six-foot fence. Aside from these requirements a candidate must also Climb stairs, adapt or engage in Physical restraint, simulate a foot pursuit, rescue a victim by dragging a 175-180lb dummy for 600 feet, and shoot a gun in the middle of a circular ring, and not allow the barrel of the gun to touch the edges of the ring.

    These tasks require an agile, mobile body with less wear and tear. As one gets older, cardiovascular endurance diminishes and hormone levels naturally change, causing muscle loss and the requirement of longer recovery time after demanding physical tasks. An age requirement is not meant to discriminate against a particular age group, its meant to keep that individual and his colleagues safe.

    References

    [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/623)

    https://www.devinemillimet.com/uploads/docs/enews/Labor-Employment/06-21-13/firefighter-law-enforcement-exception-to-the-ADEA.html

    https://nypdrecruit.com/pages/police-officer-training-physical-requirements

    530 d2 reply stephanie

    What types of situations would one expect to fall under this Act?

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from being targeted because of their “race, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, or sexual orientation” (OASAM, n.d., para. 1). When reviewing the archives, you can expect the following types of cases to follow under this act:

    – a supervisor or manager using racial slurs towards an employee (causes a hostile work environment).

    – being touched without consent, inappropriate comments, requests for sexual favors, or threats connected to promotions

    – being passed over for promotions, terminated, or punished because of gender, religion, age, disability, or national origin

    – harassment based on sexual orientation or identity

    – refusing accommodations for religious purposes

    – Failing to provide legally required accommodations under the Disabilities Act of 1990 (EEOC, n.d., para. 1).

    – Retaliating against employees who have filed reports of discrimination and/or participated in investigations (Newbold, 2007, p. 2).

    How might you, as a manager, avoid these situations?

    1. If I was the manager, to avoid these situations, I would ensure I created a fun, yet professional, respectful, and all-inclusive work culture. I would have an open-door policy and push open communication. I would reiterate confidentiality (what is discussed with me stays with me, unless I am bound by my position to share information).

    2. I would clearly and effectively communicate discrimination, unsolicited touching, offensive actions and comments, retaliation of any kind, or any form of harassment will not be tolerated. Those actions will result in immediate termination of employment.

    3. I would provide separate trainings that review the guidelines and policies surrounding Title VII. I would have a training on preventing harassment, to help employees recognize unacceptable. During this training I would exhibit the reporting procedures and reiterate the consequences of violating the policies. With these trainings, I would lead by example by exhibiting the same behaviors I expect from my employees. I would have a training on boundaries and confidentiality. All trainings will be repeated on an annual basis to ensure everyone knows what behavior is acceptable in the workplace.

    4. As a manager, I would respond in a reasonable and fair manner to complaints. I would document all incidents (if it’s not documented, it didn’t happen). I would take all complaints with serious concern and complete a thorough investigate while protecting the reporting person with protection from retaliation.

    5. During the hiring process, I can avoid these situations by ensuring I am hiring based on experience, credentials, and how the person fits in the company and if they are an asset to the company.

    6. When it comes to promotion, discipline, termination. and evaluation, all decisions will be based on lack of performance (making sure performance has been documented up to the point of termination). Promotion will be based on knowledge, years of service, experience, and qualifications. Qualifications don’t always have to come from having a degree; qualifications can come from years of service or experience.

    References

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (n.d.). Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Retrieved May 14, 2026, from
    [https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/titles-i-and-v-americans-disabilities-act-1990-ada](https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/titles-i-and-v-americans-disabilities-act-1990-ada)

    Newbold, M.H. (2007, March 19). When does a Petty Slight Ripen into Retaliation under Title VII? International Association of Chiefs of Police.
    [ccis.ucourses.com](https://ccis.ucourses.com/content/enforced/1053708-MSCJ_530_DEA_5-25SUMR1/Discussion%20)

    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration & Management (OASAM). (n.d.). Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved on May 14, 2026, from
    [https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-of-1964](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-of-1964)

    less

    530 d2 reply aalia

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 defines harassment as unwelcome verbal or physical conduct based on legally protected characteristics such as race, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or retaliation. However, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights provides many examples of discrimination and harassment complaints. Some of the most common forms of workplace discrimination discussed within these reports include sexual harassment, employment discrimination, and racial discrimination, all of which can negatively impact an employee’s ability to work in a safe, fair, and professional environment.

    Sexual Harassment is a form of inappropriate behavior that may include unwanted touching, seeking sexual favors, making sexual jokes, or asking intimate questions about a person’s sex life. It can also include repeatedly asking a person to go on a date after being told no or even sharing pornographic or sexual photos through email or text messages. According to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2020), the #MeToo movement examines sexual harassment in government workplaces, which includes “structural power imbalances and gender disparities” as well as “retaliation among victims of sexual harassment.” For instance, if a manager decides to make sexual comments toward an employee who declines every time, the employee will eventually feel uncomfortable around the manager, creating a hostile work environment. The employee’s refusal can also lead the manager to retaliate by denying a promotion or even by terminating the employee, which can affect the employee’s employment status. To help prevent sexual harassment from continuing, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2020) discussed implementing anti-harassment training programs to ensure that “victims are adequately protected against retaliation” and recommended that “Congress require findings of sexual harassment to be automatically referred to the Office of Special Counsel to ensure protections are enforced, and perpetrators are appropriately disciplined”.

    The Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (1997) examined employment discrimination, highlighting instances where employees were treated unfairly. The committee reported that people of color were denied employment opportunities at significantly higher rates, with males experiencing discrimination more frequently than females. Asian Americans were specifically identified as a group facing employment discrimination, particularly in cases where individuals were employed for several months but later terminated due to language barriers or differences in educational backgrounds (Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1997). These findings indicate that some companies failed to provide adequate training, workplace support, or information about employee rights during the hiring process. Although individuals from diverse racial and cultural backgrounds may be capable of performing job duties effectively, some employers appear unwilling to invest the necessary time and resources to train employees who speak other languages. This reluctance suggests a preference for hiring individuals who are fluent in English, thereby limiting opportunities for people from other races and cultures.

    Racial discrimination may manifest as either direct or indirect actions, in which employers exhibit conscious bias, prejudice, or reliance on racial stereotypes. For instance, a manager might decline to hire a Black applicant due to personal prejudice rather than evaluating the applicant’s qualifications, skills, or experience. As a manager, I would first implement a zero-tolerance policy regarding harassment and discrimination, ensuring that all employees clearly understand which behaviors are unacceptable. I would also require mandatory training to reinforce guidelines for professionalism, respect, accountability, and compliance with federal law. Additionally, I would provide employees with confidential channels to report unethical behavior without fear of retaliation. By adopting an open-door policy and encouraging supervisors to facilitate open discussions, I aim to address concerns proactively and foster a safe, trusting work environment.

    References:

    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2020, April 1). U.S. Commission on Civil Rights releases report, Federal #MeToo: Examining sexual harassment in government workplaces.
    [https://www.usccr.gov/files/press/2020/04-01-Federal-Me-Too-PR.pdf](https://www.usccr.gov/files/press/2020/04-01-Federal-Me-Too-PR.pdf)

    Utah Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1997). Employment discrimination in Utah.
    [https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/2018/11-13-Utah-Employment-Discrimination-1997.pdf](https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/2018/11-13-Utah-Employment-Discrimination-1997.pdf)

    525 d1 reply troy

    I  believe there are a few rare cases where holding a U.S. citizen in custody without immediate judicial access might be necessary, but I would approach that idea with caution. For me, the main point is temporary. If a U.S. citizen is captured on the battlefield while fighting for enemy forces, the government may need to detain them temporarily to assess their status and ensure national security. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the government could detain a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant. However, it emphasized that the citizen still had due process rights and the opportunity to contest the detention before an impartial decision-maker. I get the need for emergency detention during war or serious national security threats, but I don’t think the government should be able to keep a citizen locked up indefinitely without court oversight.  This also connects to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld and Rasul v. Bush, because both cases show that national security does not completely erase legal protections. The Court in Hamdan rejected military commission procedures that violated federal law and Common Article 3, while in Rasul, it permitted federal courts to hear habeas petitions from Guantanamo detainees. Reichel (2017) argues that criminal justice systems mirror a nation's values, and in the U.S., one key value is the limitation of government power through due process.

    I support the ruling on the British torture-evidence issue. Evidence obtained through torture shouldn't be allowed in court, even if British officials weren't directly involved. The 2005 House of Lords case, A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ruled against using evidence obtained through torture, including that gathered by foreign officials abroad. I believe that's the right standard since using evidence still gives torture some value. It encourages countries to ignore issues while others handle the tough tasks. The U.S. should adopt a similar standard. From a practical law-enforcement perspective, torture evidence is unreliable because people will say almost anything to stop pain or fear. It undermines the justice system's legitimacy.

    References

    A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 71.
    [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051208/aand-1.htm](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051208/aand-1.htm)

    Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006).

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).

    Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    525 d1 reply Daniela

    1. We have a judicial system founded on the premise of probable cause and the right to due process. I personally don't think that any American deserves or should be held, detained, or restricted based on assumptions, bias, or other elements without legal bases. Thinking of historical events where American citizens were detained and had their movements restricted, such as the Japanese Americans during WWII. Around 120,000 people of Japanese descent and roughly 70,000 U.S. citizens were removed, relocated, and had their movement restricted pretty much equivalent to incarceration, but without recourse to the judicial system. This happened due to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, combined with a mass hysteria which led to racial prejudice and labeling of individuals as “enemy aliens” no matter of their citizenship status. Analyzing all this situation with my 2026 view, I think the decision makers were advised by scared “leaders” who influenced these decisions based on their bias and fears. The American people, even at the time, recognized this was a human rights violation, and many were appalled at the decision of the Supreme Court to uphold the decision made in Korematsu v. United States (1944) (Adachi, 2022)

    Another event in our recent history where restrictions were exchanged for supposed safety was during covid-19. At the height of covid, I had to deploy my whole battalion of almost 700 Soldiers. We had to isolate, quarantine, feed, lodge and so many more logistical elements in a world where everything and everyone has stopped. Locals where we deployed to had curfews and hefty fines were being issued if they were found on the streets before 6am or after 8pm. They had to log online to print a ticket with their destination to be able to travel outside their dwellings to avoid fines. We were lacking resources, were on lockdown in small little spaces, and many of us found out we could NEVER make it on shows like "Alone". Facilities were closed; the gyms were forever closed. A friend of mine had to quarantine three times during this stint. The quarantine protocol was 14 days, alone in a fairly remote part of the post. He texted me one day and said he ran 10 miles in that room; he told me he was going crazy. I guess that's what it means to be tortured?!

    2. Torturing someone to obtain information has been used since the dawn of civilization. Torture is still practiced in many countries to obtain confessions or to secure convictions. Of course, torture is used for more than just legal obliging methods, but I will mostly focus on this aspect. Methods such as prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, threats, and humiliation are designed to break the strongest person down. The UN Convention against Torture defines torture as: “any act that intentionally inflicts severe physical or mental pain or suffering, carried out by or with the consent of a public official, for purposes such as obtaining information, punishment, or intimidation.” (scienceinsights.org, 2026) A person under duress, threatened with or in solitary confinement, prolonged interrogation, and sleep deprived, could tell or admit to an investigator anything they are suggesting to him too. Physical torture, which I hope doesn’t happen within our police stations or other organizations that should be upholding the law, is even more evil and unconscionable.

    References

    Adachi, N. (2022). https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/legality-japanese-american-relocation. Retrieved from https://www.ebsco.com.

    scienceinsights.org. (2026, March 20). Retrieved from https://scienceinsights.org/what-is-psychological-torture-and-what-it-does-to-the-brain/.

  • [Solved] 2–3 Page Analysis Paper criminology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) APA format. Page requirement not including title page. AI (No AI allowed) & Turnitin report required.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    APA format. Page requirement not including title page.

    AI (No AI allowed) & Turnitin report required.

  • [Solved] PowerPoint presentation with at least 12 content slides (not including title or reference slides)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) AI & Turnitin report required

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    AI & Turnitin report required

  • [Solved] HCAD D1 W1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://umgc-edu.zoom.us/rec/share/CzWNn3B3djcRzJF_gyDBdvPmtTltAXe7pHOpA9wzr159SnhKXrXIY1GYm2urAMV0.xZMJdkTJJKz1o_kL https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1431714&type=coursefile&fileId=Week+1++Evaluation+and+Analysis.pptx – [\ \ HCADD1W1.docx](https://www.sweetstu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://umgc-edu.zoom.us/rec/share/CzWNn3B3djcRzJF_gyDBdvPmtTltAXe7pHOpA9wzr159SnhKXrXIY1GYm2urAMV0.xZMJdkTJJKz1o_kL

    https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1431714&type=coursefile&fileId=Week+1++Evaluation+and+Analysis.pptx

    – [\
    \
    HCADD1W1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hcadd1w1-docx "HCADD1W1.docx")

  • [Solved] DUE 5/21

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (5)** – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsM1.docx – howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow.pdf – HistoryofUrbanPlanning.pptx – MustourcitiesremainuglyAmericasurbancrisisandtheEuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970.pdf – jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (5)**

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsM1.docx

    – howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow.pdf
    – HistoryofUrbanPlanning.pptx
    – MustourcitiesremainuglyAmericasurbancrisisandtheEuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970.pdf
    – jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith_2013.pdf

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsM1.docx**

    PADM708

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post
    **one thread of 750 words by** 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. References must be in current APA format.

    Based on your readings thus far from the Learn items and your own research summarize and analyze two urban planning theories used in the U. S. Next, describe how other countries influenced the two urban planning selected. Discuss how a biblical perspective can be applied to urban planning. Please use scripture(s) to
    **support** the position.

    **howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow-pdf)

    **HistoryofUrbanPlanning.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/historyofurbanplanning-pptx)

    **MustourcitiesremainuglyAmericasurbancrisisandtheEuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mustourcitiesremainuglyamericasurbancrisisandtheeuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970-pdf)

    **jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith_2013.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jplarticle-rice-waldner-smith-2013-pdf)

    **jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith_2013.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jplarticle-rice-waldner-smith-2013-pdf)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsM1.docx**

    PADM708

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post
    **one thread of 750 words by** 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. References must be in current APA format.

    Based on your readings thus far from the Learn items and your own research summarize and analyze two urban planning theories used in the U. S. Next, describe how other countries influenced the two urban planning selected. Discuss how a biblical perspective can be applied to urban planning. Please use scripture(s) to
    **support** the position.

    **howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow-pdf)

    **HistoryofUrbanPlanning.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/historyofurbanplanning-pptx)

    **MustourcitiesremainuglyAmericasurbancrisisandtheEuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mustourcitiesremainuglyamericasurbancrisisandtheeuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970-pdf)

    **jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith_2013.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jplarticle-rice-waldner-smith-2013-pdf)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsM1.docx**

    PADM708

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post
    **one thread of 750 words by** 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. References must be in current APA format.

    Based on your readings thus far from the Learn items and your own research summarize and analyze two urban planning theories used in the U. S. Next, describe how other countries influenced the two urban planning selected. Discuss how a biblical perspective can be applied to urban planning. Please use scripture(s) to
    **support** the position.

    **howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/howard-2003-garden-cities-of-to-morrow-pdf)

    **HistoryofUrbanPlanning.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/historyofurbanplanning-pptx)

    **MustourcitiesremainuglyAmericasurbancrisisandtheEuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mustourcitiesremainuglyamericasurbancrisisandtheeuropeancitytransatlanticperspectivesonurbandevelopment19451970-pdf)

    **jplarticle_rice_waldner_smith_2013.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jplarticle-rice-waldner-smith-2013-pdf)

  • [Solved] Discussion Question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Read the following fact pattern and then answer the questions that follow: Mary and Jack were dating for six years before they got married. Prior to their marriage, Mary gave birth to three children fathered by Jack. One year after their marriage, Jack and Mary separated. During their separation, Ma…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Read the following fact pattern and then answer the questions that follow:

    Mary and Jack were dating for six years before they got married. Prior to their marriage, Mary gave birth to three children fathered by Jack. One year after their marriage, Jack and Mary separated. During their separation, Mary gave birth to a fourth child that was not the biological product of Jack. The parties and the children all reside in the state of Florida and have always done so.

    Questions:

    a.Pursuant to Florida Chapter 742, who may lawfully establish paternity to a child through legal action? Identify your legal authority and fully explain your response.

    b. Are any or all of the children legitimate children within the eyes of the law? What does Privette v. Dept. say about this situation? What is the legal status of each of the children?

    c. If Mary and Jack reconcile and save their marriage, could the biological father of the fourth child sue Mary and Jack to establish paternity of that child?

  • [Solved] Law – Criminal Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Assignment

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Assignment

  • [Solved] week 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (2)** – ## week4.docx – ## LiteratureReview.docx **## week4.docx** 530 d1 350 words According to this week’s readings, a law enforcement member has rights under the Garrity Rule articulated in [Garrity v. New Jersey 38…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (2)**

    – ## week4.docx

    – ## LiteratureReview.docx

    **## week4.docx**

    530 d1 350 words

    According to this week’s readings, a law enforcement member has rights under the Garrity Rule articulated in
    [Garrity v. New Jersey 385 U.S. 493](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf). What are Garrity rights? Why are they so important to law enforcement members? Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    Can a law enforcement member refuse to co-operate using Garrity as a shield? Be detailed in your response.

    https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4

    [https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf)

    530 d2 350 words

    The protections afforded to law enforcement officers under the
    [Weingarten](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/420/251.html) and Loudermill decisions are important for the integrity of the Internal Affairs process. Describe both Weingarten and Loudermill in detail, and discuss the situations and conditions under which each is applicable.

    How might a manager in the criminal justice system avoid making mistakes with regard to these?  Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    [https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html)

    [https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4](https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4)

    525 d1 300 words

    1. The “You Should Know!” box titled “Proof and Truth” (page 126 of your textbook) suggests that adversarial proceedings can be distinguished as relying on the government’s ability to prove (following specific rules of criminal procedure) the defendant’s guilt, whereas the inquisitorial process spends more time on investigations to determine whether the defendant truly committed the crime.

    · Do you think it is a fair distinction?
    Include in your response a reference to the additional identifiers noted in the box (e.g., legal guilt versus factual guilt and due process versus crime control).

    2. During the discussion of hudud and qisas crimes, it was noted that by having a category of crimes that require retaliation, Sharia law is attempting to satisfy the human tendency to retaliate.

    · Discuss whether you agree that there is such a human tendency.

    · If so, does the American justice system provide a mechanism to accommodate that tendency?

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US).
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470)

    Dropbox

    Dropbox Assignment 5
    Visit the Council on Foreign Relations, read the article on
    ["How Police Compare in Different Democracies](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-police-compare-different-democracies)"
    , then compare and contrast the police services in other countries.

    1. Select two of the police agencies mentioned then write a paragraph on EACH that gives some insight into the structure, functions, and operations of that agency. If you feel that it is appropriate, include any information or overview of the criminal justice system surrounding the police jurisdictions reviewed.

    2. Read TWO of the following articles from media sources writing news stories that compare shootings by police officers in countries around the world.

    Write a paragraph each of the two articles and summarize the points raised in each article. Be sure to provide your opinion about the article’s apparent accuracy, fairness, and the reasonableness of any suggestions in the article for change in the United States.

    · The Guardian's "
    [The Counted Police Killings: US vs. Other Countries](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/09/the-counted-police-killings-us-vs-other-countries)"

    · The Christian Science Monitor's "
    [Why Police Don't Pull Guns in Many Countries](http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2015/0628/Why-police-don-t-pull-guns-in-many-countries)"

    · The Huffington Post's "
    [Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared to European Cops](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870)"

    Dropbox assignments are between 300-500 words and written in the
    [APA format](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format). Submissions are not to exceed 550 words

    525 research paper

    Submit an outline of your research paper to the Dropbox folder. Your outline should account for at least 12 pages of content with section headings, plus title, abstract, and reference pages.

    Incorporate the 12 sources from your literature review into your outline. Include the headings and sub-headings you anticipate for the paper. For each level 1 heading include a sentence or two to describe your anticipated content and refer to the supporting documents from your literature review.

    Your outline should follow the guidelines for an
    [APA Style formatted paper](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/literature-review-student-paper.docx) including double-spaced sentences, in a 12pt. font, with 1-inch-wide margins. Points are awarded for a correctly formatted writing style.

    _The more content you submit earlier on, the more feedback your instructor can provide._ This will increase your chances on a higher grade substantially.

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470

    **## LiteratureReview.docx**

    **Literature Review**

    **Due Process and Comparative Criminal Justice Protections in Modern Legal Systems**

    Globalization, technology and shifts in human rights norms have an impact on criminal justice in all aspects. The literature review will give a background on research studies in the domains of due process, procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and constitutional protections related to the criminal justice system across different jurisdictions. Applies to comparative legal worlds, not in the USA, and focuses on rights of due process, search and seizure, self-incrimination, and rights to counsel. Another area of current concern under the law highlighted in the literature is the way in which the laws are changing in response to new issues regarding artificial intelligence, digital evidence, and transnational crime.

    **Due Process in Criminal Justice**

    Amagnya (2022) examines police prosecutions and the possibility that hybridization of the investigator roles and the prosecutor working hand in hand can affect the rights to due process. The study indicates that the impartial investigative (as well as prosecutive) authority needed for fair trials could become more suspectable because of overlapping duties of the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the case. The study suggests that having the officer control both investigations and prosecution may make neutrality necessary for a fair trial more problematic and create the risk of bias and wrongful conviction. This is an extension of worries about the separation of powers in criminal procedure.

    Similarly, Dhami & van den Brink (2022) examine the decision on pre-trial detention in jurisdictions in their study and define that there is great variation in practices regarding detention. Their study findings suggest that subjective opinions have a greater impact on detention decisions than the generally accepted legal standards, which is a concern regarding the arbitrary deprivation of freedom. They are in favor of evidence-based reforms to make the procedures consistent and are eager to safeguard the rights of the suspects during pre-trial proceedings.

    In addition, Schaap & Saarikkomäki (2022) add procedural justice by critiquing versions of it that only include perceptions of fairness. True procedural justice must consider structural inequalities and inequalities in the power of institutions as well, they say. Certain values play a crucial role in comparative criminal justice analysis, which is why they are discussed here using the example of the French and German systems of norms.

    **Artificial Intelligence and Due Process Protections**.

    In cases where AI is increasingly being incorporated into the criminal justice systems, it raises new challenges for constitutional rights protection. As AI becomes a more common feature of criminal justice systems, constitutional rights protection presents new challenges. AI has been used in crime prevention, while it has many potential applications as described by Blount (2022). The problem with these systems is that they are often opaque and cannot be explained, and if those systems are not accountable, it might be considered a violation of due process. Bias in policing by using AI tools may reinforce the existing bias and result in discriminatory policing patterns that will adversely affect marginalized communities. Algorithmic governance in the criminal justice system in the UK is also explored by Zilka et al. (2022). They are focusing their studies on the need to be transparent, have oversight on, and be explained by algorithmic decision-making.

    **Digital Evidence, Search and Seizure, and Cross-Border Challenges**

    A systematic review of the challenges in the management of digital evidence from different jurisdictions has been done by Casino et al. (2022). They identified laws of access to data, data privacy provisions, and jurisdiction provisions that cause conflicts. All of these create challenges for (traditional) search and seizure procedures aimed at collecting physical evidence rather than in digital spaces.

    Panzavolta & Maes (2022) tackle illegal Evidence exclusion in the era of Mass Surveillance. They find increasing tension between the security interests and individual rights in this analysis within the framework of European Union law. The authors recommend clearing out illegal evidence using inclusive rules and advocate for principled exclusionary rules to exclude evidence obtained in an illegal search, thus reinforcing the protections against illegal search and seizure.

    This international aspect has been included in Rose (2022), who writes about transnational crimes and the necessity of PIL to uphold legal obligations. Crime crosses the border, bringing with it certain problems and difficulties about the boundaries of jurisdiction, but with certain respect for the standards of due process, there is a need for cooperation with other states.

    **Equality Before the Law**

    McConnell (2022) indicates that there are systematic discrepancies in legal decision-making, even if one's approach is formal law and has an emphasis on neutrality. Newburn and Jones (2022) show that not only is there variation in punishment practices between countries, but also differences in crime rates, which can be explained as being influenced by political, cultural, and institutional features. They found that the overall values of society affect the laws and may lead to bias and proportionality in sentencing.

    Winterdyk 2022 offers a comparison and contrast of the various African criminal justice systems, with a focus on the historical, political, and economic backgrounds. This study suggests that constraints on resources and structural inequalities are a problem that commonly confronts post-colonial legal systems, and that such constraints impact upon equality of constitutional protections for fair trial rights and representation.

    **Judicial Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms**

    Oversight by judges is very important in guaranteeing fairness in the negotiated justice system. This article from Davis (2022) describes deferred prosecution agreements and the need to hold deferred prosecutors accountable by the judiciary. Without adequate judicial oversight, prosecutorial discretion will lead to disparity in enforcement of the law and to proffer of unclear sentencing. The effects of this do not only apply when attempting a right to counsel and equalization of treatment in plea-like proceedings in different jurisdictions, but this has far-reaching consequences.

    **Right to Counsel and Fair Trial Protections**

    Many of the examined studies indirectly reference legal representation in terms of fairness and procedural protections; while these are not always directly related to “right to counsel,” they appear to have a similar purpose to providing access to counsel. Amagnya (2022) and Dhami and van den Brink (2022) emphasize that there are risks in the first steps of the criminal procedure when legal protections are not equally provided. A failure to provide for legal counsel at the pre-trial stages can have a profound effect on various issues – detention, case disposition, punitive sanctions, and so forth.

    The literature depicts a close relationship between access to counsel and widespread procedural justice and judicial independence at a jurisdictional level. Legal aid that is robust is more likely to offer a more level playing field in the stages of interrogation, prosecution, and trial.

    **Conclusion**

    It is observed that while there are legal differences between different systems and variations in national or uniform approaches, there are common problems that need to be addressed in criminal justice systems today. From jurisdiction to jurisdiction, with the sophistication of technology, crime in other jurisdictions, and systemic inequality facing increased tests of due process protections, search and seizure, and the right to counsel. AI and digital evidence generate additional issues that need new legal protections for a fair and transparent justice system.

    **References**

    Amagnya, M. A. (2022). Due process in police-led prosecutions: Views of Ghanaian police prosecutors.
    _International Journal of Police Science & Management_, 146135572210895.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562](https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562)

    Blount, K. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to prevent crime: implications for due process and criminal justice.
    _AI & SOCIETY_,
    _39_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z)

    Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence.
    _Journal of Cybersecurity_,
    _8_(1), 1–18.
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014](https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014)

    Davis, F. (2022). Judicial Review of Deferred Prosecution Agreements: A Comparative Study.
    _SSRN Electronic Journal_.
    [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985)

    Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform.
    _European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0)

    McConnell, B. (2022).
    _Racial Sentencing Disparities and Differential Progression Through the Criminal Justice System: Evidence From Linked Federal and State Court Data_.
    [https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282)

    Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2022). Policing, punishment and comparative penality.
    _British Journal of Criminology_,
    _62_(5).
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032](https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032)

    Panzavolta, M., & Maes, E. (2022). Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union.
    _The International Journal of Evidence & Proof_, 136571272210883.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328](https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328)

    Rose, C. (2022). Enforcing the “Community Interest” in Combating Transnational Crimes: The Potential for Public Interest Litigation.
    _Netherlands International Law Review_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0)

    Schaap, D., & Saarikkomäki, E. (2022). Rethinking police procedural justice.
    _Theoretical Criminology_,
    _26_(3), 136248062110566.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680](https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680)

    Winterdyk, J. (2022). Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice within the African Continent.
    _Strathmore Law Journal_,
    _6_(1), 46–70.
    [https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157](https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157)

    Zilka, M., Sargeant, H., & Weller, A. (2022). Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study.
    _Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200](https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200)

    **## LiteratureReview.docx**

    **Literature Review**

    **Due Process and Comparative Criminal Justice Protections in Modern Legal Systems**

    Globalization, technology and shifts in human rights norms have an impact on criminal justice in all aspects. The literature review will give a background on research studies in the domains of due process, procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and constitutional protections related to the criminal justice system across different jurisdictions. Applies to comparative legal worlds, not in the USA, and focuses on rights of due process, search and seizure, self-incrimination, and rights to counsel. Another area of current concern under the law highlighted in the literature is the way in which the laws are changing in response to new issues regarding artificial intelligence, digital evidence, and transnational crime.

    **Due Process in Criminal Justice**

    Amagnya (2022) examines police prosecutions and the possibility that hybridization of the investigator roles and the prosecutor working hand in hand can affect the rights to due process. The study indicates that the impartial investigative (as well as prosecutive) authority needed for fair trials could become more suspectable because of overlapping duties of the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the case. The study suggests that having the officer control both investigations and prosecution may make neutrality necessary for a fair trial more problematic and create the risk of bias and wrongful conviction. This is an extension of worries about the separation of powers in criminal procedure.

    Similarly, Dhami & van den Brink (2022) examine the decision on pre-trial detention in jurisdictions in their study and define that there is great variation in practices regarding detention. Their study findings suggest that subjective opinions have a greater impact on detention decisions than the generally accepted legal standards, which is a concern regarding the arbitrary deprivation of freedom. They are in favor of evidence-based reforms to make the procedures consistent and are eager to safeguard the rights of the suspects during pre-trial proceedings.

    In addition, Schaap & Saarikkomäki (2022) add procedural justice by critiquing versions of it that only include perceptions of fairness. True procedural justice must consider structural inequalities and inequalities in the power of institutions as well, they say. Certain values play a crucial role in comparative criminal justice analysis, which is why they are discussed here using the example of the French and German systems of norms.

    **Artificial Intelligence and Due Process Protections**.

    In cases where AI is increasingly being incorporated into the criminal justice systems, it raises new challenges for constitutional rights protection. As AI becomes a more common feature of criminal justice systems, constitutional rights protection presents new challenges. AI has been used in crime prevention, while it has many potential applications as described by Blount (2022). The problem with these systems is that they are often opaque and cannot be explained, and if those systems are not accountable, it might be considered a violation of due process. Bias in policing by using AI tools may reinforce the existing bias and result in discriminatory policing patterns that will adversely affect marginalized communities. Algorithmic governance in the criminal justice system in the UK is also explored by Zilka et al. (2022). They are focusing their studies on the need to be transparent, have oversight on, and be explained by algorithmic decision-making.

    **Digital Evidence, Search and Seizure, and Cross-Border Challenges**

    A systematic review of the challenges in the management of digital evidence from different jurisdictions has been done by Casino et al. (2022). They identified laws of access to data, data privacy provisions, and jurisdiction provisions that cause conflicts. All of these create challenges for (traditional) search and seizure procedures aimed at collecting physical evidence rather than in digital spaces.

    Panzavolta & Maes (2022) tackle illegal Evidence exclusion in the era of Mass Surveillance. They find increasing tension between the security interests and individual rights in this analysis within the framework of European Union law. The authors recommend clearing out illegal evidence using inclusive rules and advocate for principled exclusionary rules to exclude evidence obtained in an illegal search, thus reinforcing the protections against illegal search and seizure.

    This international aspect has been included in Rose (2022), who writes about transnational crimes and the necessity of PIL to uphold legal obligations. Crime crosses the border, bringing with it certain problems and difficulties about the boundaries of jurisdiction, but with certain respect for the standards of due process, there is a need for cooperation with other states.

    **Equality Before the Law**

    McConnell (2022) indicates that there are systematic discrepancies in legal decision-making, even if one's approach is formal law and has an emphasis on neutrality. Newburn and Jones (2022) show that not only is there variation in punishment practices between countries, but also differences in crime rates, which can be explained as being influenced by political, cultural, and institutional features. They found that the overall values of society affect the laws and may lead to bias and proportionality in sentencing.

    Winterdyk 2022 offers a comparison and contrast of the various African criminal justice systems, with a focus on the historical, political, and economic backgrounds. This study suggests that constraints on resources and structural inequalities are a problem that commonly confronts post-colonial legal systems, and that such constraints impact upon equality of constitutional protections for fair trial rights and representation.

    **Judicial Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms**

    Oversight by judges is very important in guaranteeing fairness in the negotiated justice system. This article from Davis (2022) describes deferred prosecution agreements and the need to hold deferred prosecutors accountable by the judiciary. Without adequate judicial oversight, prosecutorial discretion will lead to disparity in enforcement of the law and to proffer of unclear sentencing. The effects of this do not only apply when attempting a right to counsel and equalization of treatment in plea-like proceedings in different jurisdictions, but this has far-reaching consequences.

    **Right to Counsel and Fair Trial Protections**

    Many of the examined studies indirectly reference legal representation in terms of fairness and procedural protections; while these are not always directly related to “right to counsel,” they appear to have a similar purpose to providing access to counsel. Amagnya (2022) and Dhami and van den Brink (2022) emphasize that there are risks in the first steps of the criminal procedure when legal protections are not equally provided. A failure to provide for legal counsel at the pre-trial stages can have a profound effect on various issues – detention, case disposition, punitive sanctions, and so forth.

    The literature depicts a close relationship between access to counsel and widespread procedural justice and judicial independence at a jurisdictional level. Legal aid that is robust is more likely to offer a more level playing field in the stages of interrogation, prosecution, and trial.

    **Conclusion**

    It is observed that while there are legal differences between different systems and variations in national or uniform approaches, there are common problems that need to be addressed in criminal justice systems today. From jurisdiction to jurisdiction, with the sophistication of technology, crime in other jurisdictions, and systemic inequality facing increased tests of due process protections, search and seizure, and the right to counsel. AI and digital evidence generate additional issues that need new legal protections for a fair and transparent justice system.

    **References**

    Amagnya, M. A. (2022). Due process in police-led prosecutions: Views of Ghanaian police prosecutors.
    _International Journal of Police Science & Management_, 146135572210895.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562](https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562)

    Blount, K. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to prevent crime: implications for due process and criminal justice.
    _AI & SOCIETY_,
    _39_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z)

    Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence.
    _Journal of Cybersecurity_,
    _8_(1), 1–18.
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014](https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014)

    Davis, F. (2022). Judicial Review of Deferred Prosecution Agreements: A Comparative Study.
    _SSRN Electronic Journal_.
    [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985)

    Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform.
    _European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0)

    McConnell, B. (2022).
    _Racial Sentencing Disparities and Differential Progression Through the Criminal Justice System: Evidence From Linked Federal and State Court Data_.
    [https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282)

    Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2022). Policing, punishment and comparative penality.
    _British Journal of Criminology_,
    _62_(5).
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032](https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032)

    Panzavolta, M., & Maes, E. (2022). Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union.
    _The International Journal of Evidence & Proof_, 136571272210883.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328](https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328)

    Rose, C. (2022). Enforcing the “Community Interest” in Combating Transnational Crimes: The Potential for Public Interest Litigation.
    _Netherlands International Law Review_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0)

    Schaap, D., & Saarikkomäki, E. (2022). Rethinking police procedural justice.
    _Theoretical Criminology_,
    _26_(3), 136248062110566.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680](https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680)

    Winterdyk, J. (2022). Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice within the African Continent.
    _Strathmore Law Journal_,
    _6_(1), 46–70.
    [https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157](https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157)

    Zilka, M., Sargeant, H., & Weller, A. (2022). Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study.
    _Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200](https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200)

    **## week4.docx**

    530 d1 350 words

    According to this week’s readings, a law enforcement member has rights under the Garrity Rule articulated in
    [Garrity v. New Jersey 385 U.S. 493](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf). What are Garrity rights? Why are they so important to law enforcement members? Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    Can a law enforcement member refuse to co-operate using Garrity as a shield? Be detailed in your response.

    https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4

    [https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf)

    530 d2 350 words

    The protections afforded to law enforcement officers under the
    [Weingarten](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/420/251.html) and Loudermill decisions are important for the integrity of the Internal Affairs process. Describe both Weingarten and Loudermill in detail, and discuss the situations and conditions under which each is applicable.

    How might a manager in the criminal justice system avoid making mistakes with regard to these?  Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    [https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html)

    [https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4](https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4)

    525 d1 300 words

    1. The “You Should Know!” box titled “Proof and Truth” (page 126 of your textbook) suggests that adversarial proceedings can be distinguished as relying on the government’s ability to prove (following specific rules of criminal procedure) the defendant’s guilt, whereas the inquisitorial process spends more time on investigations to determine whether the defendant truly committed the crime.

    · Do you think it is a fair distinction?
    Include in your response a reference to the additional identifiers noted in the box (e.g., legal guilt versus factual guilt and due process versus crime control).

    2. During the discussion of hudud and qisas crimes, it was noted that by having a category of crimes that require retaliation, Sharia law is attempting to satisfy the human tendency to retaliate.

    · Discuss whether you agree that there is such a human tendency.

    · If so, does the American justice system provide a mechanism to accommodate that tendency?

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US).
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470)

    Dropbox

    Dropbox Assignment 5
    Visit the Council on Foreign Relations, read the article on
    ["How Police Compare in Different Democracies](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-police-compare-different-democracies)"
    , then compare and contrast the police services in other countries.

    1. Select two of the police agencies mentioned then write a paragraph on EACH that gives some insight into the structure, functions, and operations of that agency. If you feel that it is appropriate, include any information or overview of the criminal justice system surrounding the police jurisdictions reviewed.

    2. Read TWO of the following articles from media sources writing news stories that compare shootings by police officers in countries around the world.

    Write a paragraph each of the two articles and summarize the points raised in each article. Be sure to provide your opinion about the article’s apparent accuracy, fairness, and the reasonableness of any suggestions in the article for change in the United States.

    · The Guardian's "
    [The Counted Police Killings: US vs. Other Countries](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/09/the-counted-police-killings-us-vs-other-countries)"

    · The Christian Science Monitor's "
    [Why Police Don't Pull Guns in Many Countries](http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2015/0628/Why-police-don-t-pull-guns-in-many-countries)"

    · The Huffington Post's "
    [Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared to European Cops](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870)"

    Dropbox assignments are between 300-500 words and written in the
    [APA format](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format). Submissions are not to exceed 550 words

    525 research paper

    Submit an outline of your research paper to the Dropbox folder. Your outline should account for at least 12 pages of content with section headings, plus title, abstract, and reference pages.

    Incorporate the 12 sources from your literature review into your outline. Include the headings and sub-headings you anticipate for the paper. For each level 1 heading include a sentence or two to describe your anticipated content and refer to the supporting documents from your literature review.

    Your outline should follow the guidelines for an
    [APA Style formatted paper](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/literature-review-student-paper.docx) including double-spaced sentences, in a 12pt. font, with 1-inch-wide margins. Points are awarded for a correctly formatted writing style.

    _The more content you submit earlier on, the more feedback your instructor can provide._ This will increase your chances on a higher grade substantially.

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470

    **## LiteratureReview.docx**

    **Literature Review**

    **Due Process and Comparative Criminal Justice Protections in Modern Legal Systems**

    Globalization, technology and shifts in human rights norms have an impact on criminal justice in all aspects. The literature review will give a background on research studies in the domains of due process, procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and constitutional protections related to the criminal justice system across different jurisdictions. Applies to comparative legal worlds, not in the USA, and focuses on rights of due process, search and seizure, self-incrimination, and rights to counsel. Another area of current concern under the law highlighted in the literature is the way in which the laws are changing in response to new issues regarding artificial intelligence, digital evidence, and transnational crime.

    **Due Process in Criminal Justice**

    Amagnya (2022) examines police prosecutions and the possibility that hybridization of the investigator roles and the prosecutor working hand in hand can affect the rights to due process. The study indicates that the impartial investigative (as well as prosecutive) authority needed for fair trials could become more suspectable because of overlapping duties of the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the case. The study suggests that having the officer control both investigations and prosecution may make neutrality necessary for a fair trial more problematic and create the risk of bias and wrongful conviction. This is an extension of worries about the separation of powers in criminal procedure.

    Similarly, Dhami & van den Brink (2022) examine the decision on pre-trial detention in jurisdictions in their study and define that there is great variation in practices regarding detention. Their study findings suggest that subjective opinions have a greater impact on detention decisions than the generally accepted legal standards, which is a concern regarding the arbitrary deprivation of freedom. They are in favor of evidence-based reforms to make the procedures consistent and are eager to safeguard the rights of the suspects during pre-trial proceedings.

    In addition, Schaap & Saarikkomäki (2022) add procedural justice by critiquing versions of it that only include perceptions of fairness. True procedural justice must consider structural inequalities and inequalities in the power of institutions as well, they say. Certain values play a crucial role in comparative criminal justice analysis, which is why they are discussed here using the example of the French and German systems of norms.

    **Artificial Intelligence and Due Process Protections**.

    In cases where AI is increasingly being incorporated into the criminal justice systems, it raises new challenges for constitutional rights protection. As AI becomes a more common feature of criminal justice systems, constitutional rights protection presents new challenges. AI has been used in crime prevention, while it has many potential applications as described by Blount (2022). The problem with these systems is that they are often opaque and cannot be explained, and if those systems are not accountable, it might be considered a violation of due process. Bias in policing by using AI tools may reinforce the existing bias and result in discriminatory policing patterns that will adversely affect marginalized communities. Algorithmic governance in the criminal justice system in the UK is also explored by Zilka et al. (2022). They are focusing their studies on the need to be transparent, have oversight on, and be explained by algorithmic decision-making.

    **Digital Evidence, Search and Seizure, and Cross-Border Challenges**

    A systematic review of the challenges in the management of digital evidence from different jurisdictions has been done by Casino et al. (2022). They identified laws of access to data, data privacy provisions, and jurisdiction provisions that cause conflicts. All of these create challenges for (traditional) search and seizure procedures aimed at collecting physical evidence rather than in digital spaces.

    Panzavolta & Maes (2022) tackle illegal Evidence exclusion in the era of Mass Surveillance. They find increasing tension between the security interests and individual rights in this analysis within the framework of European Union law. The authors recommend clearing out illegal evidence using inclusive rules and advocate for principled exclusionary rules to exclude evidence obtained in an illegal search, thus reinforcing the protections against illegal search and seizure.

    This international aspect has been included in Rose (2022), who writes about transnational crimes and the necessity of PIL to uphold legal obligations. Crime crosses the border, bringing with it certain problems and difficulties about the boundaries of jurisdiction, but with certain respect for the standards of due process, there is a need for cooperation with other states.

    **Equality Before the Law**

    McConnell (2022) indicates that there are systematic discrepancies in legal decision-making, even if one's approach is formal law and has an emphasis on neutrality. Newburn and Jones (2022) show that not only is there variation in punishment practices between countries, but also differences in crime rates, which can be explained as being influenced by political, cultural, and institutional features. They found that the overall values of society affect the laws and may lead to bias and proportionality in sentencing.

    Winterdyk 2022 offers a comparison and contrast of the various African criminal justice systems, with a focus on the historical, political, and economic backgrounds. This study suggests that constraints on resources and structural inequalities are a problem that commonly confronts post-colonial legal systems, and that such constraints impact upon equality of constitutional protections for fair trial rights and representation.

    **Judicial Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms**

    Oversight by judges is very important in guaranteeing fairness in the negotiated justice system. This article from Davis (2022) describes deferred prosecution agreements and the need to hold deferred prosecutors accountable by the judiciary. Without adequate judicial oversight, prosecutorial discretion will lead to disparity in enforcement of the law and to proffer of unclear sentencing. The effects of this do not only apply when attempting a right to counsel and equalization of treatment in plea-like proceedings in different jurisdictions, but this has far-reaching consequences.

    **Right to Counsel and Fair Trial Protections**

    Many of the examined studies indirectly reference legal representation in terms of fairness and procedural protections; while these are not always directly related to “right to counsel,” they appear to have a similar purpose to providing access to counsel. Amagnya (2022) and Dhami and van den Brink (2022) emphasize that there are risks in the first steps of the criminal procedure when legal protections are not equally provided. A failure to provide for legal counsel at the pre-trial stages can have a profound effect on various issues – detention, case disposition, punitive sanctions, and so forth.

    The literature depicts a close relationship between access to counsel and widespread procedural justice and judicial independence at a jurisdictional level. Legal aid that is robust is more likely to offer a more level playing field in the stages of interrogation, prosecution, and trial.

    **Conclusion**

    It is observed that while there are legal differences between different systems and variations in national or uniform approaches, there are common problems that need to be addressed in criminal justice systems today. From jurisdiction to jurisdiction, with the sophistication of technology, crime in other jurisdictions, and systemic inequality facing increased tests of due process protections, search and seizure, and the right to counsel. AI and digital evidence generate additional issues that need new legal protections for a fair and transparent justice system.

    **References**

    Amagnya, M. A. (2022). Due process in police-led prosecutions: Views of Ghanaian police prosecutors.
    _International Journal of Police Science & Management_, 146135572210895.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562](https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562)

    Blount, K. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to prevent crime: implications for due process and criminal justice.
    _AI & SOCIETY_,
    _39_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z)

    Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence.
    _Journal of Cybersecurity_,
    _8_(1), 1–18.
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014](https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014)

    Davis, F. (2022). Judicial Review of Deferred Prosecution Agreements: A Comparative Study.
    _SSRN Electronic Journal_.
    [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985)

    Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform.
    _European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0)

    McConnell, B. (2022).
    _Racial Sentencing Disparities and Differential Progression Through the Criminal Justice System: Evidence From Linked Federal and State Court Data_.
    [https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282)

    Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2022). Policing, punishment and comparative penality.
    _British Journal of Criminology_,
    _62_(5).
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032](https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032)

    Panzavolta, M., & Maes, E. (2022). Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union.
    _The International Journal of Evidence & Proof_, 136571272210883.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328](https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328)

    Rose, C. (2022). Enforcing the “Community Interest” in Combating Transnational Crimes: The Potential for Public Interest Litigation.
    _Netherlands International Law Review_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0)

    Schaap, D., & Saarikkomäki, E. (2022). Rethinking police procedural justice.
    _Theoretical Criminology_,
    _26_(3), 136248062110566.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680](https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680)

    Winterdyk, J. (2022). Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice within the African Continent.
    _Strathmore Law Journal_,
    _6_(1), 46–70.
    [https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157](https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157)

    Zilka, M., Sargeant, H., & Weller, A. (2022). Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study.
    _Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200](https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200)

    **## week4.docx**

    530 d1 350 words

    According to this week’s readings, a law enforcement member has rights under the Garrity Rule articulated in
    [Garrity v. New Jersey 385 U.S. 493](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf). What are Garrity rights? Why are they so important to law enforcement members? Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    Can a law enforcement member refuse to co-operate using Garrity as a shield? Be detailed in your response.

    https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4

    [https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385493/usrep385493.pdf)

    530 d2 350 words

    The protections afforded to law enforcement officers under the
    [Weingarten](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/420/251.html) and Loudermill decisions are important for the integrity of the Internal Affairs process. Describe both Weingarten and Loudermill in detail, and discuss the situations and conditions under which each is applicable.

    How might a manager in the criminal justice system avoid making mistakes with regard to these?  Discuss fully, demonstrating your knowledge of the readings.

    [https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/420/251.html)

    [https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4](https://library.ccis.edu/mscj530/week4)

    525 d1 300 words

    1. The “You Should Know!” box titled “Proof and Truth” (page 126 of your textbook) suggests that adversarial proceedings can be distinguished as relying on the government’s ability to prove (following specific rules of criminal procedure) the defendant’s guilt, whereas the inquisitorial process spends more time on investigations to determine whether the defendant truly committed the crime.

    · Do you think it is a fair distinction?
    Include in your response a reference to the additional identifiers noted in the box (e.g., legal guilt versus factual guilt and due process versus crime control).

    2. During the discussion of hudud and qisas crimes, it was noted that by having a category of crimes that require retaliation, Sharia law is attempting to satisfy the human tendency to retaliate.

    · Discuss whether you agree that there is such a human tendency.

    · If so, does the American justice system provide a mechanism to accommodate that tendency?

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US).
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470)

    Dropbox

    Dropbox Assignment 5
    Visit the Council on Foreign Relations, read the article on
    ["How Police Compare in Different Democracies](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-police-compare-different-democracies)"
    , then compare and contrast the police services in other countries.

    1. Select two of the police agencies mentioned then write a paragraph on EACH that gives some insight into the structure, functions, and operations of that agency. If you feel that it is appropriate, include any information or overview of the criminal justice system surrounding the police jurisdictions reviewed.

    2. Read TWO of the following articles from media sources writing news stories that compare shootings by police officers in countries around the world.

    Write a paragraph each of the two articles and summarize the points raised in each article. Be sure to provide your opinion about the article’s apparent accuracy, fairness, and the reasonableness of any suggestions in the article for change in the United States.

    · The Guardian's "
    [The Counted Police Killings: US vs. Other Countries](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/09/the-counted-police-killings-us-vs-other-countries)"

    · The Christian Science Monitor's "
    [Why Police Don't Pull Guns in Many Countries](http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2015/0628/Why-police-don-t-pull-guns-in-many-countries)"

    · The Huffington Post's "
    [Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared to European Cops](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870)"

    Dropbox assignments are between 300-500 words and written in the
    [APA format](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format). Submissions are not to exceed 550 words

    525 research paper

    Submit an outline of your research paper to the Dropbox folder. Your outline should account for at least 12 pages of content with section headings, plus title, abstract, and reference pages.

    Incorporate the 12 sources from your literature review into your outline. Include the headings and sub-headings you anticipate for the paper. For each level 1 heading include a sentence or two to describe your anticipated content and refer to the supporting documents from your literature review.

    Your outline should follow the guidelines for an
    [APA Style formatted paper](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/literature-review-student-paper.docx) including double-spaced sentences, in a 12pt. font, with 1-inch-wide margins. Points are awarded for a correctly formatted writing style.

    _The more content you submit earlier on, the more feedback your instructor can provide._ This will increase your chances on a higher grade substantially.

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780134548470

    **## LiteratureReview.docx**

    **Literature Review**

    **Due Process and Comparative Criminal Justice Protections in Modern Legal Systems**

    Globalization, technology and shifts in human rights norms have an impact on criminal justice in all aspects. The literature review will give a background on research studies in the domains of due process, procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and constitutional protections related to the criminal justice system across different jurisdictions. Applies to comparative legal worlds, not in the USA, and focuses on rights of due process, search and seizure, self-incrimination, and rights to counsel. Another area of current concern under the law highlighted in the literature is the way in which the laws are changing in response to new issues regarding artificial intelligence, digital evidence, and transnational crime.

    **Due Process in Criminal Justice**

    Amagnya (2022) examines police prosecutions and the possibility that hybridization of the investigator roles and the prosecutor working hand in hand can affect the rights to due process. The study indicates that the impartial investigative (as well as prosecutive) authority needed for fair trials could become more suspectable because of overlapping duties of the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the case. The study suggests that having the officer control both investigations and prosecution may make neutrality necessary for a fair trial more problematic and create the risk of bias and wrongful conviction. This is an extension of worries about the separation of powers in criminal procedure.

    Similarly, Dhami & van den Brink (2022) examine the decision on pre-trial detention in jurisdictions in their study and define that there is great variation in practices regarding detention. Their study findings suggest that subjective opinions have a greater impact on detention decisions than the generally accepted legal standards, which is a concern regarding the arbitrary deprivation of freedom. They are in favor of evidence-based reforms to make the procedures consistent and are eager to safeguard the rights of the suspects during pre-trial proceedings.

    In addition, Schaap & Saarikkomäki (2022) add procedural justice by critiquing versions of it that only include perceptions of fairness. True procedural justice must consider structural inequalities and inequalities in the power of institutions as well, they say. Certain values play a crucial role in comparative criminal justice analysis, which is why they are discussed here using the example of the French and German systems of norms.

    **Artificial Intelligence and Due Process Protections**.

    In cases where AI is increasingly being incorporated into the criminal justice systems, it raises new challenges for constitutional rights protection. As AI becomes a more common feature of criminal justice systems, constitutional rights protection presents new challenges. AI has been used in crime prevention, while it has many potential applications as described by Blount (2022). The problem with these systems is that they are often opaque and cannot be explained, and if those systems are not accountable, it might be considered a violation of due process. Bias in policing by using AI tools may reinforce the existing bias and result in discriminatory policing patterns that will adversely affect marginalized communities. Algorithmic governance in the criminal justice system in the UK is also explored by Zilka et al. (2022). They are focusing their studies on the need to be transparent, have oversight on, and be explained by algorithmic decision-making.

    **Digital Evidence, Search and Seizure, and Cross-Border Challenges**

    A systematic review of the challenges in the management of digital evidence from different jurisdictions has been done by Casino et al. (2022). They identified laws of access to data, data privacy provisions, and jurisdiction provisions that cause conflicts. All of these create challenges for (traditional) search and seizure procedures aimed at collecting physical evidence rather than in digital spaces.

    Panzavolta & Maes (2022) tackle illegal Evidence exclusion in the era of Mass Surveillance. They find increasing tension between the security interests and individual rights in this analysis within the framework of European Union law. The authors recommend clearing out illegal evidence using inclusive rules and advocate for principled exclusionary rules to exclude evidence obtained in an illegal search, thus reinforcing the protections against illegal search and seizure.

    This international aspect has been included in Rose (2022), who writes about transnational crimes and the necessity of PIL to uphold legal obligations. Crime crosses the border, bringing with it certain problems and difficulties about the boundaries of jurisdiction, but with certain respect for the standards of due process, there is a need for cooperation with other states.

    **Equality Before the Law**

    McConnell (2022) indicates that there are systematic discrepancies in legal decision-making, even if one's approach is formal law and has an emphasis on neutrality. Newburn and Jones (2022) show that not only is there variation in punishment practices between countries, but also differences in crime rates, which can be explained as being influenced by political, cultural, and institutional features. They found that the overall values of society affect the laws and may lead to bias and proportionality in sentencing.

    Winterdyk 2022 offers a comparison and contrast of the various African criminal justice systems, with a focus on the historical, political, and economic backgrounds. This study suggests that constraints on resources and structural inequalities are a problem that commonly confronts post-colonial legal systems, and that such constraints impact upon equality of constitutional protections for fair trial rights and representation.

    **Judicial Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms**

    Oversight by judges is very important in guaranteeing fairness in the negotiated justice system. This article from Davis (2022) describes deferred prosecution agreements and the need to hold deferred prosecutors accountable by the judiciary. Without adequate judicial oversight, prosecutorial discretion will lead to disparity in enforcement of the law and to proffer of unclear sentencing. The effects of this do not only apply when attempting a right to counsel and equalization of treatment in plea-like proceedings in different jurisdictions, but this has far-reaching consequences.

    **Right to Counsel and Fair Trial Protections**

    Many of the examined studies indirectly reference legal representation in terms of fairness and procedural protections; while these are not always directly related to “right to counsel,” they appear to have a similar purpose to providing access to counsel. Amagnya (2022) and Dhami and van den Brink (2022) emphasize that there are risks in the first steps of the criminal procedure when legal protections are not equally provided. A failure to provide for legal counsel at the pre-trial stages can have a profound effect on various issues – detention, case disposition, punitive sanctions, and so forth.

    The literature depicts a close relationship between access to counsel and widespread procedural justice and judicial independence at a jurisdictional level. Legal aid that is robust is more likely to offer a more level playing field in the stages of interrogation, prosecution, and trial.

    **Conclusion**

    It is observed that while there are legal differences between different systems and variations in national or uniform approaches, there are common problems that need to be addressed in criminal justice systems today. From jurisdiction to jurisdiction, with the sophistication of technology, crime in other jurisdictions, and systemic inequality facing increased tests of due process protections, search and seizure, and the right to counsel. AI and digital evidence generate additional issues that need new legal protections for a fair and transparent justice system.

    **References**

    Amagnya, M. A. (2022). Due process in police-led prosecutions: Views of Ghanaian police prosecutors.
    _International Journal of Police Science & Management_, 146135572210895.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562](https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089562)

    Blount, K. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to prevent crime: implications for due process and criminal justice.
    _AI & SOCIETY_,
    _39_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01513-z)

    Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence.
    _Journal of Cybersecurity_,
    _8_(1), 1–18.
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014](https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014)

    Davis, F. (2022). Judicial Review of Deferred Prosecution Agreements: A Comparative Study.
    _SSRN Electronic Journal_.
    [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985)

    Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform.
    _European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0)

    McConnell, B. (2022).
    _Racial Sentencing Disparities and Differential Progression Through the Criminal Justice System: Evidence From Linked Federal and State Court Data_.
    [https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.14282)

    Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2022). Policing, punishment and comparative penality.
    _British Journal of Criminology_,
    _62_(5).
    [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032](https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac032)

    Panzavolta, M., & Maes, E. (2022). Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union.
    _The International Journal of Evidence & Proof_, 136571272210883.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328](https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221088328)

    Rose, C. (2022). Enforcing the “Community Interest” in Combating Transnational Crimes: The Potential for Public Interest Litigation.
    _Netherlands International Law Review_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00214-0)

    Schaap, D., & Saarikkomäki, E. (2022). Rethinking police procedural justice.
    _Theoretical Criminology_,
    _26_(3), 136248062110566.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680](https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211056680)

    Winterdyk, J. (2022). Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice within the African Continent.
    _Strathmore Law Journal_,
    _6_(1), 46–70.
    [https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157](https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v6i1.157)

    Zilka, M., Sargeant, H., & Weller, A. (2022). Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study.
    _Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200](https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534200)

  • [Solved] week 3 replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (1)** – ## week3replies.docx **## week3replies.docx** 100 words reply each 525 Reply to troy Countries identified as part of the socialist legal tradition fit better within the civil law tradition than as a distinct le…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (1)**

    – ## week3replies.docx

    **## week3replies.docx**

    100 words reply each

    525 Reply to troy

    Countries identified as part of the socialist legal tradition fit better within the civil law tradition than as a distinct legal family. Socialist law has a distinct political background, emphasizing the state, collective interests, and government control. Yet when you examine how these systems function, they still largely depend on written codes, statutes, and centralized legal authority. That seems more aligned with civil law than common law. Reichel (2017) notes that legal traditions aid in comparing systems, but here, I believe "socialist law" reflects the political ideology more than the fundamental legal framework. Countries such as China, Vietnam, and Cuba have socialist governments, yet their courts and laws operate based on established legal rules. To me, socialist law resembles a civil law system with socialist elements.

    The second question reminds us that people interpret religion differently, even among those who identify with it. Two people can identify as devout Muslims yet hold entirely different views on terrorism, as Islamic law has various interpretations. Sunni Islam has schools like Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali, whereas Shia Islam has the Ja’fari school. These schools share core beliefs, but they can differ in how they interpret religious law and authority (Britannica, n.d.). It’s important to note that one Muslim may firmly denounce terrorism as murder and against Islam, while another might distort religious beliefs to rationalize violence. I don't believe that means Islam supports terrorism. Interpretation, politics, culture, and personal beliefs can influence how a person practices their religion. It's crucial to evaluate individuals based on their actions and evidence, rather than generalizing an entire religion.

    Britannica. (n.d.). Shariah. Encyclopedia Britannica.
    [https://www.britannica.com/topic/sharia](https://www.britannica.com/topic/sharia)

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education

    less

    525 reply to eric

    Question 1: Socialist Law and the Civil Legal Tradition

    An argument can be made that socialist law should no longer be treated as a fully separate legal tradition and should instead be understood as a political variation within the broader civil law tradition. Reichel (2017) identifies socialist law as historically rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideology, state ownership, centralized planning, and the belief that law should serve the goals of the socialist state. However, many countries once classified as socialist legal systems now rely heavily on written codes, legislative supremacy, bureaucratic legal administration, and limited judicial precedent, all features commonly associated with civil law systems. For example, China’s modern legal system includes extensive codification, including its Civil Code, which has been described as a major legal development in China’s move toward a formalized legal order (Sweet, 2023).

    The separate socialist category may therefore create more confusion than clarity. Contemporary socialist systems, especially China and Vietnam, are not identical to the older Soviet model. Their legal systems combine civil law structures with socialist political control. Liu (2025) notes that contemporary Chinese legal ideology reflects authoritarian political commitments, but this does not erase the system’s civil-law characteristics, including codified law and legislative centrality. Therefore, socialist law may be better understood as a civil law system shaped by socialist political ideology, rather than as a completely separate legal family.

    Eliminating socialist law as a separate category would also strengthen comparative analysis by focusing on how law actually operates rather than relying on Cold War-era classifications. Reichel (2017) emphasizes that legal traditions should be compared through their institutions, procedures, and social purposes. From that perspective, socialist systems today often function through civil-law methods, even when political control limits judicial independence. The more accurate classification would be “civil law with socialist characteristics,” because the legal form is civil-law based while the political purpose remains socialist or authoritarian.

    Question 2: Islamic Schools of Law and Differing Views on Terrorism

    Persons who claim to be devout Muslims may hold very different views on terrorism because Islamic law is not a single, uniform system. Reichel (2017) explains that Islamic law, or Sharia, developed through several schools of legal interpretation. The major Sunni schools, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali, along with Shi’a traditions, differ in how they interpret sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, consensus, and analogy. These differences can shape views on violence, authority, punishment, warfare, and political resistance.

    This is important because extremist groups often rely on selective or distorted interpretations of Islamic law to justify terrorism. However, many mainstream Islamic scholars reject terrorism as inconsistent with Islamic legal and ethical principles. Hoelz (2021) explains that terrorist interpretations of Sharia often contradict classical Islamic law governing war, especially rules concerning legitimate authority, protection of noncombatants, and limits on violence. In other words, the same religious tradition can produce very different conclusions depending on who is interpreting the law, what school of jurisprudence is followed, and whether the interpretation is scholarly, political, or extremist.

    Therefore, disagreement among devout Muslims does not necessarily reflect disagreement about faith itself, but disagreement about legal interpretation, political authority, and the misuse of religious doctrine. Mojtahedi (2021) notes that harsh counterterrorism practices in Iraq were not necessarily grounded in Islamic jurisprudence, showing that political violence and legal punishment are often shaped more by state power and conflict than by religion alone. This distinction is important because it prevents the mistake of equating Islam with terrorism. A comparative criminal justice perspective requires recognizing that legal traditions are internally diverse and shaped by history, politics, and interpretation.

    References

    Hoelz, J. (2021). Islamist terrorism and the classical Islamic law of war. International Law Studies, 97, 1266–1300.

    Liu, Z. (2025). Redefining law in China. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 73(3), 672–718.

    Mojtahedi, M. H. (2021). Islamic law and the balancing of justice and peace in Iraq’s post-IS transitional justice process. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 15(2), 407–428.

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative criminal justice systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Sweet, A. S. (2023). Breaching the taboo? Constitutional dimensions of the new Chinese Civil Code. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 18(1), 1–32.

    530 d1 rodney

    A qualified individual with a disability is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act as a person who meets the skill, experience, education, and other job related requirements for a position and who can perform the important functions of that job with or without reasonable accommodation (Legal Information Institute, 2022). Essential functions are the basic job duties that the position exists to perform. For example, a firefighter must be able to carry hoses and climb ladders. A cashier must be able to handle money. If a person with a disability cannot do these essential tasks even with help like a special chair or extra time, then that person is not qualified for that specific job. However, if the person can do the tasks with a reasonable change to the workplace, such as a ramp for a wheelchair user or a sign language interpreter for a deaf employee, then the person is qualified. The ADA also protects people who have a record of a disability or who are seen by others as having a disability. The framers of the ADA wrote that barriers to employment and other areas have hurt American society and kept people with disabilities from showing their talents. By removing those barriers, the ADA helps everyone gain from the skills of people with disabilities.

    Criminal justice fields should not be exempt from the ADA. The Department of Justice clearly states that state and local governments including police departments, courts, jails, and prisons must follow the ADA (U.S. Department of Justice, n.d.). This means they have to make reasonable changes to policies, provide physical access to buildings, and offer communication aids like sign language interpreters. Some people argue that criminal justice jobs are too dangerous for the ADA to apply. However, the law already allows employers to set real job requirements. A police officer must be able to chase a suspect or use force if needed. If a disability prevents a person from doing those essential functions, that person is not qualified and the employer does not have to hire them. But many jobs in criminal justice do not require physical tasks. A dispatcher answering 911 calls, a clerk processing records, or a counselor working with inmates can often do their jobs with reasonable accommodations. Exempting criminal justice would deny jobs to qualified people with disabilities and go against the purpose of the ADA. The Federalist Papers, as explained by Maggs (2007), show that the Constitution was created to form a just and effective government. Excluding people with disabilities from criminal justice jobs would be unjust. Therefore, the ADA applies fully to criminal justice fields.

    References

    Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. (2022). Qualified individual with a disability.
    [https://liicornell.org/wex/qualified_individual_with_a_disability](https://liicornell.org/wex/qualified_individual_with_a_disability)

    Maggs, G. E. (2007). A concise guide to the Federalist Papers as a source of the original meaning of the United States Constitution.

    U.S. Department of Justice,ADA.gov (n.d.). Criminal justice.
    [https://www.ada.gov/topics/criminal-justice/](https://www.ada.gov/topics/criminal-justice/)

    530 d1 reply troy

    Under the ADA, a qualified "individual with a disability” is an individual who (1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially restricts one or more major life activities, (2) has a record of such an impairment, or (3) is regarded as having such an impairment. In the employment context, the individual must also be able to execute the fundamental responsibilities of the job, with or without appropriate accommodation (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990). The last portion is significant, particularly in criminal justice. The ADA does not require an agency to recruit or maintain someone who cannot safely do the job. It states the agency can’t make choices based on prejudices, fear, or preconceptions.

    I don’t think that the criminal justice fields should be immune from the ADA. Police agencies, jails, courts, probation offices, and prisons all interact with the public, and persons with disabilities are part of that public. They may be victims, witnesses, suspects, inmates, staff, or applicants. Exempting criminal justice agencies leaves a severe vacuum in civil rights protection. In Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey, the Supreme Court ruled that Title II of the ADA extends to state prisons. Meaning that correctional institutions cannot bypass disability rights merely because someone is jailed.

    But at the same time, I think ADA compliance needs to be reasonable. Policing and prisons are not routine office work. Officers may have to sprint, speak coherently under pressure, battle through stress, make rapid decisions, and safeguard others. Agencies should be permitted to maintain job-related physical, medical, psychological, and communication requirements. But such requirements must be linked to the real responsibilities of the work, not to some archaic notion of incapacity.

    From a managerial perspective, balancing is the optimum strategy. Agencies are required to offer reasonable accommodation where possible, train staff on ADA regulations, make facilities accessible, and establish effective communication for deaf, hard-of-hearing, mentally ill, or otherwise impaired individuals. City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan highlights how complex ADA problems may be in police contacts involving mental illness and safety concerns. Overall, criminal justice agencies should comply with the ADA while enforcing valid safety and performance criteria.

    Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213.

    City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, 575 U.S. 600 (2015).

    Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206 (1998).

    less

    530 d2 reply to chet

    Ricci v. DeStefano confronted a fraught tension between avoiding disparate-impact liability under Title VII and avoiding disparate-treatment liability for intentional discrimination. In my view, the Court’s narrow holding—that New Haven unlawfully discarded valid test results without a strong, demonstrable basis to believe it would be liable under disparate-impact law—was legally correct, though factually and morally uncomfortable for many. The majority required an employer who sets aside race-neutral test results to show a “strong basis in evidence” that it would have been liable for disparate impact if it had certified the results. That standard appropriately protects employees who performed well from being penalized solely because the racial composition of passers is uneven, while also recognizing that employers face legitimate pressure to avoid practices that have a disparate adverse impact on protected groups. The Court’s rule forces employers to make decisions grounded in concrete evidence (statistics, prior litigation risk, or test validation problems) rather than speculation or public pressure. This is consistent with Title VII’s dual aims of eliminating both intentional discrimination and unintentional practices that disproportionately burden protected groups; Ricci simply calibrates when an employer may lawfully sacrifice the former to avoid the latter.

    That said, Ricci exposed systemic weaknesses in how public employers design, validate, and administer examinations that determine promotions. The dissent’s forceful criticism reflected the moral intuition that employers should actively correct selection tools that perpetuate historical exclusion. But the majority’s approach placed the corrective burden where it more properly belongs: on employers to use validated, job-related selection procedures from the outset or risk either form of liability. Courts have long required job-related validation after Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which recognized that neutral tests may be unlawful if not shown to be related to job performance; Ricci does not displace Griggs but stresses employers cannot discard results retroactively without solid legal justification.

    For law enforcement, the decision has several practical consequences. Agencies reliant on written or composite exams for promotion must be meticulous in test development, validation studies, and documentation demonstrating job-relatedness. Departments should engage psychometric experts, implement multiple, validated assessment methods (e.g., structured oral boards, performance simulations), and pilot and analyze results for disparate impact before finalizing procedures. If an employer anticipates that a valid test will yield racially disparate outcomes, Ricci allows the employer to consider the disparate-impact risk only with a strong evidentiary basis; thus, agencies that proactively validate and, where appropriate, revise selection tools are better positioned to both diversify their ranks and defend against litigation. Ricci also complicates well-intentioned administrative remedies: efforts to avoid public discord by discarding results may now produce successful disparate-treatment claims by successful candidates. Finally, the decision underscores the need for transparent processes and early consultation with counsel and experts when test design or results raise equity concerns, as ad hoc choices made after the fact are legally perilous.

    In sum, Ricci’s legal balancing is defensible and enforces discipline on employers to design lawful, job-related selection systems; however, it also means that meaningful institutional efforts to remedy systemic disparities must be proactive, evidence-based, and well-documented. For policing, where promotion and hiring materially affect public trust and operational capability, the ruling signals that compliance and fairness require rigorous validation, transparent processes, and informed policymaking rather than last-minute fixes.

    Course Week 3 materials. (2026). Course readings and lecture notes on employment discrimination and reverse discrimination. [Course packet].

    Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009). Oyez. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/07-1428

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). Oyez. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/70-60

    U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Disparate Impact. https://www.eeoc.gov/disparate-impact

    less

    530 d2 reply Rodney

    The Supreme Court made the correct decision in Ricci v. DeStefano (Cornell Law School, 2009), but the ruling also creates a difficult standard for employers to follow. The case involved white and Hispanic firefighters in New Haven, Connecticut who passed promotion tests but were denied promotion because city officials threw out the test results. The city feared a disparate impact lawsuit from minority firefighters who performed poorly on the test. However, the Court held that throwing out valid test results based only on racial outcomes is illegal reverse discrimination. Under Title VII, an employer cannot use race based actions to avoid potential disparate impact liability unless there is a strong basis in evidence that the test was flawed or that a better alternative test existed. The city had no such evidence. The tests were professionally designed and job related. As Justice Kennedy wrote, fear of a lawsuit alone cannot justify discriminating against workers based on their race. The Court got it right because allowing cities to discard valid test results just because of racial outcomes would hurt fairness and hard work (Britannica, n.d.). Yet the new standard makes it very hard for employers to know when they can act to fix potential discrimination.

    This decision strongly impacts law enforcement fields. Police and fire departments rely on objective promotional exams to identify qualified candidates for leadership roles. After Ricci, agencies must carefully validate any employment test before using it. They cannot wait until after the results come in to decide if the test is fair. The ruling forces law enforcement agencies to build valid, job related exams from the start or face lawsuits from either side (Cornell Law School, 2009). The Federalist Papers teach that the Constitution aims for a balanced and fair government (Maggs, 2007). In law enforcement, this means treating all candidates equally under the same standards. Agencies should use multiple assessment methods like assessment centers and performance evaluations, not just written tests. They should also validate all exams through job analysis and consider race neutral alternatives if problems appear. The Ricci decision reminds law enforcement that equal treatment means judging every candidate by the same fair standards, not by the color of their skin (Britannica, n.d.).

    References

    Britannica. (n.d.). Ricci v. DeStefano: Supreme Court case, employment discrimination.
    [https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1540641](https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1540641)

    Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. (2009). Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009).
    [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-1428](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-1428)

    Maggs, G. E. (2007). A concise guide to the Federalist Papers as a source of the original meaning of the United States Constitution.

    **## week3replies.docx**

    100 words reply each

    525 Reply to troy

    Countries identified as part of the socialist legal tradition fit better within the civil law tradition than as a distinct legal family. Socialist law has a distinct political background, emphasizing the state, collective interests, and government control. Yet when you examine how these systems function, they still largely depend on written codes, statutes, and centralized legal authority. That seems more aligned with civil law than common law. Reichel (2017) notes that legal traditions aid in comparing systems, but here, I believe "socialist law" reflects the political ideology more than the fundamental legal framework. Countries such as China, Vietnam, and Cuba have socialist governments, yet their courts and laws operate based on established legal rules. To me, socialist law resembles a civil law system with socialist elements.

    The second question reminds us that people interpret religion differently, even among those who identify with it. Two people can identify as devout Muslims yet hold entirely different views on terrorism, as Islamic law has various interpretations. Sunni Islam has schools like Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali, whereas Shia Islam has the Ja’fari school. These schools share core beliefs, but they can differ in how they interpret religious law and authority (Britannica, n.d.). It’s important to note that one Muslim may firmly denounce terrorism as murder and against Islam, while another might distort religious beliefs to rationalize violence. I don't believe that means Islam supports terrorism. Interpretation, politics, culture, and personal beliefs can influence how a person practices their religion. It's crucial to evaluate individuals based on their actions and evidence, rather than generalizing an entire religion.

    Britannica. (n.d.). Shariah. Encyclopedia Britannica.
    [https://www.britannica.com/topic/sharia](https://www.britannica.com/topic/sharia)

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education

    less

    525 reply to eric

    Question 1: Socialist Law and the Civil Legal Tradition

    An argument can be made that socialist law should no longer be treated as a fully separate legal tradition and should instead be understood as a political variation within the broader civil law tradition. Reichel (2017) identifies socialist law as historically rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideology, state ownership, centralized planning, and the belief that law should serve the goals of the socialist state. However, many countries once classified as socialist legal systems now rely heavily on written codes, legislative supremacy, bureaucratic legal administration, and limited judicial precedent, all features commonly associated with civil law systems. For example, China’s modern legal system includes extensive codification, including its Civil Code, which has been described as a major legal development in China’s move toward a formalized legal order (Sweet, 2023).

    The separate socialist category may therefore create more confusion than clarity. Contemporary socialist systems, especially China and Vietnam, are not identical to the older Soviet model. Their legal systems combine civil law structures with socialist political control. Liu (2025) notes that contemporary Chinese legal ideology reflects authoritarian political commitments, but this does not erase the system’s civil-law characteristics, including codified law and legislative centrality. Therefore, socialist law may be better understood as a civil law system shaped by socialist political ideology, rather than as a completely separate legal family.

    Eliminating socialist law as a separate category would also strengthen comparative analysis by focusing on how law actually operates rather than relying on Cold War-era classifications. Reichel (2017) emphasizes that legal traditions should be compared through their institutions, procedures, and social purposes. From that perspective, socialist systems today often function through civil-law methods, even when political control limits judicial independence. The more accurate classification would be “civil law with socialist characteristics,” because the legal form is civil-law based while the political purpose remains socialist or authoritarian.

    Question 2: Islamic Schools of Law and Differing Views on Terrorism

    Persons who claim to be devout Muslims may hold very different views on terrorism because Islamic law is not a single, uniform system. Reichel (2017) explains that Islamic law, or Sharia, developed through several schools of legal interpretation. The major Sunni schools, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali, along with Shi’a traditions, differ in how they interpret sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, consensus, and analogy. These differences can shape views on violence, authority, punishment, warfare, and political resistance.

    This is important because extremist groups often rely on selective or distorted interpretations of Islamic law to justify terrorism. However, many mainstream Islamic scholars reject terrorism as inconsistent with Islamic legal and ethical principles. Hoelz (2021) explains that terrorist interpretations of Sharia often contradict classical Islamic law governing war, especially rules concerning legitimate authority, protection of noncombatants, and limits on violence. In other words, the same religious tradition can produce very different conclusions depending on who is interpreting the law, what school of jurisprudence is followed, and whether the interpretation is scholarly, political, or extremist.

    Therefore, disagreement among devout Muslims does not necessarily reflect disagreement about faith itself, but disagreement about legal interpretation, political authority, and the misuse of religious doctrine. Mojtahedi (2021) notes that harsh counterterrorism practices in Iraq were not necessarily grounded in Islamic jurisprudence, showing that political violence and legal punishment are often shaped more by state power and conflict than by religion alone. This distinction is important because it prevents the mistake of equating Islam with terrorism. A comparative criminal justice perspective requires recognizing that legal traditions are internally diverse and shaped by history, politics, and interpretation.

    References

    Hoelz, J. (2021). Islamist terrorism and the classical Islamic law of war. International Law Studies, 97, 1266–1300.

    Liu, Z. (2025). Redefining law in China. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 73(3), 672–718.

    Mojtahedi, M. H. (2021). Islamic law and the balancing of justice and peace in Iraq’s post-IS transitional justice process. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 15(2), 407–428.

    Reichel, P. L. (2017). Comparative criminal justice systems (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Sweet, A. S. (2023). Breaching the taboo? Constitutional dimensions of the new Chinese Civil Code. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 18(1), 1–32.

    530 d1 rodney

    A qualified individual with a disability is defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act as a person who meets the skill, experience, education, and other job related requirements for a position and who can perform the important functions of that job with or without reasonable accommodation (Legal Information Institute, 2022). Essential functions are the basic job duties that the position exists to perform. For example, a firefighter must be able to carry hoses and climb ladders. A cashier must be able to handle money. If a person with a disability cannot do these essential tasks even with help like a special chair or extra time, then that person is not qualified for that specific job. However, if the person can do the tasks with a reasonable change to the workplace, such as a ramp for a wheelchair user or a sign language interpreter for a deaf employee, then the person is qualified. The ADA also protects people who have a record of a disability or who are seen by others as having a disability. The framers of the ADA wrote that barriers to employment and other areas have hurt American society and kept people with disabilities from showing their talents. By removing those barriers, the ADA helps everyone gain from the skills of people with disabilities.

    Criminal justice fields should not be exempt from the ADA. The Department of Justice clearly states that state and local governments including police departments, courts, jails, and prisons must follow the ADA (U.S. Department of Justice, n.d.). This means they have to make reasonable changes to policies, provide physical access to buildings, and offer communication aids like sign language interpreters. Some people argue that criminal justice jobs are too dangerous for the ADA to apply. However, the law already allows employers to set real job requirements. A police officer must be able to chase a suspect or use force if needed. If a disability prevents a person from doing those essential functions, that person is not qualified and the employer does not have to hire them. But many jobs in criminal justice do not require physical tasks. A dispatcher answering 911 calls, a clerk processing records, or a counselor working with inmates can often do their jobs with reasonable accommodations. Exempting criminal justice would deny jobs to qualified people with disabilities and go against the purpose of the ADA. The Federalist Papers, as explained by Maggs (2007), show that the Constitution was created to form a just and effective government. Excluding people with disabilities from criminal justice jobs would be unjust. Therefore, the ADA applies fully to criminal justice fields.

    References

    Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. (2022). Qualified individual with a disability.
    [https://liicornell.org/wex/qualified_individual_with_a_disability](https://liicornell.org/wex/qualified_individual_with_a_disability)

    Maggs, G. E. (2007). A concise guide to the Federalist Papers as a source of the original meaning of the United States Constitution.

    U.S. Department of Justice,ADA.gov (n.d.). Criminal justice.
    [https://www.ada.gov/topics/criminal-justice/](https://www.ada.gov/topics/criminal-justice/)

    530 d1 reply troy

    Under the ADA, a qualified "individual with a disability” is an individual who (1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially restricts one or more major life activities, (2) has a record of such an impairment, or (3) is regarded as having such an impairment. In the employment context, the individual must also be able to execute the fundamental responsibilities of the job, with or without appropriate accommodation (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990). The last portion is significant, particularly in criminal justice. The ADA does not require an agency to recruit or maintain someone who cannot safely do the job. It states the agency can’t make choices based on prejudices, fear, or preconceptions.

    I don’t think that the criminal justice fields should be immune from the ADA. Police agencies, jails, courts, probation offices, and prisons all interact with the public, and persons with disabilities are part of that public. They may be victims, witnesses, suspects, inmates, staff, or applicants. Exempting criminal justice agencies leaves a severe vacuum in civil rights protection. In Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey, the Supreme Court ruled that Title II of the ADA extends to state prisons. Meaning that correctional institutions cannot bypass disability rights merely because someone is jailed.

    But at the same time, I think ADA compliance needs to be reasonable. Policing and prisons are not routine office work. Officers may have to sprint, speak coherently under pressure, battle through stress, make rapid decisions, and safeguard others. Agencies should be permitted to maintain job-related physical, medical, psychological, and communication requirements. But such requirements must be linked to the real responsibilities of the work, not to some archaic notion of incapacity.

    From a managerial perspective, balancing is the optimum strategy. Agencies are required to offer reasonable accommodation where possible, train staff on ADA regulations, make facilities accessible, and establish effective communication for deaf, hard-of-hearing, mentally ill, or otherwise impaired individuals. City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan highlights how complex ADA problems may be in police contacts involving mental illness and safety concerns. Overall, criminal justice agencies should comply with the ADA while enforcing valid safety and performance criteria.

    Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213.

    City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, 575 U.S. 600 (2015).

    Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206 (1998).

    less

    530 d2 reply to chet

    Ricci v. DeStefano confronted a fraught tension between avoiding disparate-impact liability under Title VII and avoiding disparate-treatment liability for intentional discrimination. In my view, the Court’s narrow holding—that New Haven unlawfully discarded valid test results without a strong, demonstrable basis to believe it would be liable under disparate-impact law—was legally correct, though factually and morally uncomfortable for many. The majority required an employer who sets aside race-neutral test results to show a “strong basis in evidence” that it would have been liable for disparate impact if it had certified the results. That standard appropriately protects employees who performed well from being penalized solely because the racial composition of passers is uneven, while also recognizing that employers face legitimate pressure to avoid practices that have a disparate adverse impact on protected groups. The Court’s rule forces employers to make decisions grounded in concrete evidence (statistics, prior litigation risk, or test validation problems) rather than speculation or public pressure. This is consistent with Title VII’s dual aims of eliminating both intentional discrimination and unintentional practices that disproportionately burden protected groups; Ricci simply calibrates when an employer may lawfully sacrifice the former to avoid the latter.

    That said, Ricci exposed systemic weaknesses in how public employers design, validate, and administer examinations that determine promotions. The dissent’s forceful criticism reflected the moral intuition that employers should actively correct selection tools that perpetuate historical exclusion. But the majority’s approach placed the corrective burden where it more properly belongs: on employers to use validated, job-related selection procedures from the outset or risk either form of liability. Courts have long required job-related validation after Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which recognized that neutral tests may be unlawful if not shown to be related to job performance; Ricci does not displace Griggs but stresses employers cannot discard results retroactively without solid legal justification.

    For law enforcement, the decision has several practical consequences. Agencies reliant on written or composite exams for promotion must be meticulous in test development, validation studies, and documentation demonstrating job-relatedness. Departments should engage psychometric experts, implement multiple, validated assessment methods (e.g., structured oral boards, performance simulations), and pilot and analyze results for disparate impact before finalizing procedures. If an employer anticipates that a valid test will yield racially disparate outcomes, Ricci allows the employer to consider the disparate-impact risk only with a strong evidentiary basis; thus, agencies that proactively validate and, where appropriate, revise selection tools are better positioned to both diversify their ranks and defend against litigation. Ricci also complicates well-intentioned administrative remedies: efforts to avoid public discord by discarding results may now produce successful disparate-treatment claims by successful candidates. Finally, the decision underscores the need for transparent processes and early consultation with counsel and experts when test design or results raise equity concerns, as ad hoc choices made after the fact are legally perilous.

    In sum, Ricci’s legal balancing is defensible and enforces discipline on employers to design lawful, job-related selection systems; however, it also means that meaningful institutional efforts to remedy systemic disparities must be proactive, evidence-based, and well-documented. For policing, where promotion and hiring materially affect public trust and operational capability, the ruling signals that compliance and fairness require rigorous validation, transparent processes, and informed policymaking rather than last-minute fixes.

    Course Week 3 materials. (2026). Course readings and lecture notes on employment discrimination and reverse discrimination. [Course packet].

    Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009). Oyez. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/07-1428

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). Oyez. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/70-60

    U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Disparate Impact. https://www.eeoc.gov/disparate-impact

    less

    530 d2 reply Rodney

    The Supreme Court made the correct decision in Ricci v. DeStefano (Cornell Law School, 2009), but the ruling also creates a difficult standard for employers to follow. The case involved white and Hispanic firefighters in New Haven, Connecticut who passed promotion tests but were denied promotion because city officials threw out the test results. The city feared a disparate impact lawsuit from minority firefighters who performed poorly on the test. However, the Court held that throwing out valid test results based only on racial outcomes is illegal reverse discrimination. Under Title VII, an employer cannot use race based actions to avoid potential disparate impact liability unless there is a strong basis in evidence that the test was flawed or that a better alternative test existed. The city had no such evidence. The tests were professionally designed and job related. As Justice Kennedy wrote, fear of a lawsuit alone cannot justify discriminating against workers based on their race. The Court got it right because allowing cities to discard valid test results just because of racial outcomes would hurt fairness and hard work (Britannica, n.d.). Yet the new standard makes it very hard for employers to know when they can act to fix potential discrimination.

    This decision strongly impacts law enforcement fields. Police and fire departments rely on objective promotional exams to identify qualified candidates for leadership roles. After Ricci, agencies must carefully validate any employment test before using it. They cannot wait until after the results come in to decide if the test is fair. The ruling forces law enforcement agencies to build valid, job related exams from the start or face lawsuits from either side (Cornell Law School, 2009). The Federalist Papers teach that the Constitution aims for a balanced and fair government (Maggs, 2007). In law enforcement, this means treating all candidates equally under the same standards. Agencies should use multiple assessment methods like assessment centers and performance evaluations, not just written tests. They should also validate all exams through job analysis and consider race neutral alternatives if problems appear. The Ricci decision reminds law enforcement that equal treatment means judging every candidate by the same fair standards, not by the color of their skin (Britannica, n.d.).

    References

    Britannica. (n.d.). Ricci v. DeStefano: Supreme Court case, employment discrimination.
    [https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1540641](https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1540641)

    Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. (2009). Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009).
    [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-1428](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-1428)

    Maggs, G. E. (2007). A concise guide to the Federalist Papers as a source of the original meaning of the United States Constitution.