Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] NU505-6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU505-6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] James Home

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering James Home.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] ENG 1252 MOD 5 DB

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx – ## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx** Eng 1252 mod 5 db **Instructions:** This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx

    – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] ENG 1252 MOD 5 ASSN 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    RE V ISE nO a I – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx** Surname 3 Name Professor Name Course Name Date **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs** The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rheto…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    RE   V ISE
    nO  a I

    – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx**

    Surname 3

    Name

    Professor Name

    Course Name

    Date

    **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs**

    The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rhetoric has been very important and planned. I began by using language techniques to interest my readers and show why the subject is significant. Focusing the discussion on how genetically modified plants play a global role in productive farming, food supplies, environment care, and technological improvements showed why the subject deserves attention. This was intended to show readers the major implications of GMOs and encourage them to look at the subject from both scientific and humanitarian standpoints.

    I drew my thesis and my essay structure using the rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, and pathos from Aristotle. Reliable academic findings, recent journal articles, and commentary from experts help establish the ethos of a text (Gubala, Larson and Melonçon). It gains the audience's trust by making it clear that my argument comes from valid sources. The logic behind my content is one example of my Logos. It begins with what GMOs are, then moves on to their benefits, and closes with an assessment of how they positively or negatively impact people, society, and the economy. I tried to make the structure clear by explaining how GMOs are adopted and result in better yields and less need for pesticides. Finally, though pathos is not a major theme, I included descriptions intended to touch my audience's feelings about how desperate the world's hunger can be, how hard it is for small-scale farmers, and how necessary it is to act ethically using technology.

    That being said, I believe that my work can be improved in two significant locations. My goal is to develop and enhance my use of various kinds of information. Sometimes, despite collecting a great deal of information, I have trouble smoothly connecting it to what I say. I will focus on using the correct ways to reference others (APA) and using signal phrases at the right times, so my paraphrasing or direct quoting doesn't change the style of my essay. I am also worried that I missed giving credit for some common ideas or results and I hope to confirm that all claims lead back to trustworthy sources. I get that adding well-integrated sources to my paper boosts its credibility and I wish to ensure my paper is not dominated by outside sources but has my analysis too.

    I also find it hard to explain how GMOs impact the economy and ethics. This field is involved and needs to be explained well and discussed with care (Anyshchenko). I am searching for ways to define "economic sustainability" and "bioethics" so that readers from diverse backgrounds can relate to them without being too basic. I also think that discussing GMOs abstractly can be clearer when illustrated with real-world case studies which is why I am introducing the success stories of Bt cotton in India and Golden Rice in Southeast Asia as case studies. Still, I am making sure that my presentation of ethics is fair and respectful, while also addressing reasons to disagree with my main point.

    My overall goal is to make a reasonable argument, rhetorically sound which not only informs but persuades my readers about the significance and value of genetically modified plants in modern agriculture. I welcome suggestions from peers as to how to further improve the clarity of my economic and moral arguments and how to incorporate and source the sources used in this essay more cleanly. Also, suggestions on how to improve my transitions between paragraphs and ways to strengthen my conclusion would be appreciated. Refining these elements, I think, will help me make my work more persuasive and professional in general.

    Works Cited
    Anyshchenko, A. " The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5) (2019): 855-872.
    Gubala, C, K Larson and L Melonçon. "Do writing errors bother professionals? An analysis of the most bothersome errors and how the writer’s ethos is affected." Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3) (2020): 250-286.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx**

    Surname 3

    Name

    Professor Name

    Course Name

    Date

    **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs**

    The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rhetoric has been very important and planned. I began by using language techniques to interest my readers and show why the subject is significant. Focusing the discussion on how genetically modified plants play a global role in productive farming, food supplies, environment care, and technological improvements showed why the subject deserves attention. This was intended to show readers the major implications of GMOs and encourage them to look at the subject from both scientific and humanitarian standpoints.

    I drew my thesis and my essay structure using the rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, and pathos from Aristotle. Reliable academic findings, recent journal articles, and commentary from experts help establish the ethos of a text (Gubala, Larson and Melonçon). It gains the audience's trust by making it clear that my argument comes from valid sources. The logic behind my content is one example of my Logos. It begins with what GMOs are, then moves on to their benefits, and closes with an assessment of how they positively or negatively impact people, society, and the economy. I tried to make the structure clear by explaining how GMOs are adopted and result in better yields and less need for pesticides. Finally, though pathos is not a major theme, I included descriptions intended to touch my audience's feelings about how desperate the world's hunger can be, how hard it is for small-scale farmers, and how necessary it is to act ethically using technology.

    That being said, I believe that my work can be improved in two significant locations. My goal is to develop and enhance my use of various kinds of information. Sometimes, despite collecting a great deal of information, I have trouble smoothly connecting it to what I say. I will focus on using the correct ways to reference others (APA) and using signal phrases at the right times, so my paraphrasing or direct quoting doesn't change the style of my essay. I am also worried that I missed giving credit for some common ideas or results and I hope to confirm that all claims lead back to trustworthy sources. I get that adding well-integrated sources to my paper boosts its credibility and I wish to ensure my paper is not dominated by outside sources but has my analysis too.

    I also find it hard to explain how GMOs impact the economy and ethics. This field is involved and needs to be explained well and discussed with care (Anyshchenko). I am searching for ways to define "economic sustainability" and "bioethics" so that readers from diverse backgrounds can relate to them without being too basic. I also think that discussing GMOs abstractly can be clearer when illustrated with real-world case studies which is why I am introducing the success stories of Bt cotton in India and Golden Rice in Southeast Asia as case studies. Still, I am making sure that my presentation of ethics is fair and respectful, while also addressing reasons to disagree with my main point.

    My overall goal is to make a reasonable argument, rhetorically sound which not only informs but persuades my readers about the significance and value of genetically modified plants in modern agriculture. I welcome suggestions from peers as to how to further improve the clarity of my economic and moral arguments and how to incorporate and source the sources used in this essay more cleanly. Also, suggestions on how to improve my transitions between paragraphs and ways to strengthen my conclusion would be appreciated. Refining these elements, I think, will help me make my work more persuasive and professional in general.

    Works Cited
    Anyshchenko, A. " The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5) (2019): 855-872.
    Gubala, C, K Larson and L Melonçon. "Do writing errors bother professionals? An analysis of the most bothersome errors and how the writer’s ethos is affected." Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3) (2020): 250-286.

  • [Solved] DB

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached. – ## WK8DB.docx – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx **## WK8DB.docx** · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement. · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other. · Finally, please d…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached.

    – ## WK8DB.docx

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] theology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-2212-26-51am1-png "Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-2212-26-51am1-png "Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png")

  • [Solved] Research Paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached. – ## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx** CJUS 231 **Research Paper: Diff…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached.

    – ## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] IHP 670 Module 4 Project Preparation REQUEST

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering IHP 670 Module 4 Project Preparation REQUEST.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] IHP670 Module 4 Critique REQUEST

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering IHP670 Module 4 Critique REQUEST.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] W1:612-D

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    500 WORDS, APA WITH 2 CITATIONS

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    500 WORDS, APA WITH 2 CITATIONS