Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering see below.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] methods and applicatins

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Businesses often conduct research to maximize profits as well as to understand their competitive edge. There are a number of considerations when preparing and conducting research for a business – biases, reviewing credible sources, and ethical considerations. Throughout the research process it is im…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Businesses often conduct research to maximize profits as well as to understand their competitive edge. There are a number of considerations when preparing and conducting research for a business – biases, reviewing credible sources, and ethical considerations. Throughout the research process it is important to recognize and remove personal biases in order to provide a balanced and thorough review. Another important consideration is to review and utilize sources that are reliable and provide objective information. It is also important to think about the ethics of your research. Being honest, respecting the integrity of data, and being objective help to ensure the credibility of research.
    Utilizing the Internet, CTU Library, and your textbook, choose 1 example (or use one of those listed below) of unethical research in a **business** setting, and discuss the following in 400-600 words:
    – Explain why research might be considered unethical.
    – Share your research topic and explain ethical considerations when conducting your research.
    Examples of unethical business research:
    – [Were OkCupid's and Facebook's Experiments Unethical](https://hbr.org/2014/07/were-okcupids-and-facebooks-experiments-unethical)?
    – [Volkswagen: The Scandal Explained](https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772)

  • [Solved] Lesson plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Using the **CM Form** template, upload a classroom management plan appropriate to your subject and grade level. Before uploading your CM plan, make sure you have 1) carefully read the **CM Instructions** in full, including the tips to avoid needing to resubmit. 2) carefully read the **CM Rubric**. 3…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Using the **CM Form** template, upload a classroom management plan appropriate to your subject and grade level. Before uploading your CM plan, make sure you have
    1) carefully read the **CM Instructions** in full, including the tips to avoid needing to resubmit.
    2) carefully read the **CM Rubric**.
    3) carefully proofread your **CM plan**.
    Using the One Day Lesson Plan Form template in the curriculum, you will create an original one-day, content-based lesson plan appropriate to your subject and grade level.
    You may NOT use any portion of the example lesson plans from the curriculum.
    Before starting on and uploading your lesson plan, be sure you have –
    1. VIEWED the Lesson Planning 101 Webinar.
    2. Carefully READ over the Lesson Plan Instructions in full.
    3. Carefully READ over the Example Lesson Plans provided.
    4. Carefully READ over the Lesson Plan Rubric.
    5. Carefully PROOFREAD your Lesson Plan prior to submitting.
    Please note:
    – The information found in the links mentioned above will provide guidance on your lesson plan creation.
    – Be sure you provide a detailed response to each of the 8 Reflection Questions at the end of your Lesson Plan.  Questions are on the One Day Lesson Plan Form template, under the Reflection section.
    Please upload your TYPED Lesson Plan on a Word document or PDF format only.
    \
    CMPlanForm1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cmplanform1-docx "CMPlanForm1.docx")
    \
    One-DayLessonPlanForm3.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/one-daylessonplanform3-docx "One-DayLessonPlanForm3.docx")

  • [Solved] peds ihuman

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## pedssoapnoteexample.docx – ## pedsihumanweek4.docx **## pedssoapnoteexample.docx** **Students must paste their SOAP note under the management plan section of the iHuman system.** Dear Student, Please make sure to write your SOAP note directly in the Management Plan section within the iHuman pla…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## pedssoapnoteexample.docx

    – ## pedsihumanweek4.docx

    **## pedssoapnoteexample.docx**

    **Students must paste their SOAP note under the management plan section of the iHuman system.**

    Dear Student,

    Please make sure to write your SOAP note directly in the Management Plan section within the iHuman platform. It is important that all work is completed within iHuman. Any Word document attachments will not be accepted or graded, so be sure to submit everything through the appropriate platform.

    Thank you for your attention to this.*********************************

    **SUBJECTIVE (15 pts):**

    **CC:** “2-3 word description” (1 point)

    **HPI:** **Must write as a paragraph. NO BULLET POINTS. See example. ((10 points)

    All: (1 point)

    PMH: (1 point)

    FMH: (1 point)

    MEDS: (1 point)

    **OBJECTIVE (15 pts): Only include the pertinent systems. Note that CV/Pulm should always be included in all PE.**

    VS: (1 point)

    PE: (see example if needed) (10 points)

    Diagnostic Test/labs done: (4 points)

    **Assessment (15 pts):**

    Primary Diagnosis & ICD code: (2 points) Rationale (4 points)

    i.
    **_DDX#1 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    ii.
    **_DDX#2 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    iii.
    **_DDX#3 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    **MEDICATION (10 pts) WRITE as a prescription. Review how to write a prescription.**

    MEDICATION NAME: (include proper name and strength)

    SIG: (this is the directions)

    DISP: (this is how many you are giving)

    RF: (any refills)

    **PLAN: 20 points (ALL areas must be included.)**

    **Appropriate Interventions & Referrals: (8 points) ****
    **_See example SOAP note if unclear** This section should discuss what you did for the patient during the visit. Key exams required that you did to arrive at the diagnosis. Referrals needed?_**

    **Tell me what you did w/ this child in the office (breakdown below; all areas must be included)**

    · -What Intervention(s)/ treatment(s) in office: (for example-02, sutures, teach to use crutches, Tylenol, (4 Points)

    · -Screening tool(s) used: (1 Point)

    · -Referral(s) w rational: (1 point) IF NONE, write NONE do not skip

    · -Address modifiable risk factors: eg stop smoking, reduce screen time, etc (2 points)

    **Pt. education (5 points)-** – Educate parent and patient about today’s visit/diagnosis/meds etc. Must list a minimum of 5 patient education regarding today’s visit.

    1. Pt Ed #1

    2. Pt Ed #2

    3. Pt Ed #3

    4. Pt Ed #4

    5. Pt Ed #5

    **SDOH:** **address all 6 areas of social determinants of health (3 points)**

    1) Economic Stability-

    2) Neighborhood-

    3) Education-

    4) Food Access-

    5) Community and Social Context

    6) Healthcare System: .

    **Health Promotion/Anticipatory guidance: (4 points)**

    Must list a minimum of 4 related to child’s age. Do not simply write f/u on vaccinations, be specific. Use your Bright Futures to help you with this area. *
    **This is not pt education* See examples.**

    1) Health Promotion #1

    2) Health Promotion #2

    3) Health Promotion #3

    4) Health Promotion #4

    **Follow-up**: (5 points)

    a.
    **Timing/when: (1 points); Next WCV (1 pt)**

    b.
    **Symptom to watch for that will prompt a return (red flags): (3points)**

    **Office BILLING/VISIT CODE and CPT CODES (5 pts)**

    **Clinical Guidelines: 5 points**

    a. Name of guidelines: (1 points)

    b. What does the guidelines tell you to do, or how to make a diagnosis (4 points)

    REFERENCES (USE APA)

    **REFERENCES: SUBJECTED TO UP TO 5 POINT DEDUCTION IF NOT CITED IN YOUR TEXT**

    **_Must have 3 and must show that it is cited within your text. Please understand that references provide the information necessary for readers to identify and retrieve each work_** [_cited in the text._](https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapastyle.apa.org%2Fstyle-grammar-guidelines%2Fcitations&data=05%7C02%7Cannaliza.villena%40mail.waldenu.edu%7C832a90a179db41139bc308dd60483251%7C97fb1a0766ed498398cd2b41977edc25%7C0%7C0%7C638772585398859193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UhV7qx7TQZZBb89yZJEmRRFhIFMty9rI1NAurEaSISQ%3D&reserved=0) **_If your references are not cited within your text, then points will be deducted._**

    **NO MAYO CLINIC, no pt. education websites, CDC should only be for stats. REFERENCES must be peer-reviewed literature. Please utilize the Walden Library. Use primary sources.

    **## pedsihumanweek4.docx**

    i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions or respiratory conditions

    ![A person touching a child's mouth Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/peds-ihuman)

    Welcome to another i-Human Case Study. Take a moment to imagine a child and family you might meet. Based on the Learning Resources for this week, consider eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT); and respiratory conditions you may identify frequently as a Family Nurse Practitioner and those that may be more unusual. Also consider what aspects of the exam process might be more challenging for you—assessing, evaluating, providing multiple diagnoses, treatments, or offering the patient and family management advice. Work to be mindful of how to take best advantage of the simulated i-Human exam to prepare for pediatric patients with EENT and respiratory conditions.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/items/7099054)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider how to apply knowledge of EENT and respiratory conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.

    · Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    · Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    · Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    · Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    · Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with EENT conditions and their families.

    **Assignment:**

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the
    _i-Human Graduate Programs Help_ link within the i-Human platform.

    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

    You will access i-Human from the
    **Access i-Human** link located in the
    [Start Here module](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/1352528).

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMPLETION of the iHuman: Students must complete the required sections: • PE • key findings • differential diagnoses • test summary. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Student successfully completed all required sections in iHuman.<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent** Student missed completing 1-2 of the required sections.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not complete the iHuman required components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSUBJECTIVE: Complete HPI including all 8 aspects and pertinent information related to chief complaint, including the pertinent positives & negatives | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written chief complaint • HPI well written including all aspects of OLDCARTS/LOCATES • Includes pertinent positives & negatives<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Clearly written chief complaint • Misses 1-2 key components from the history • Missing pertinent positives and negatives<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written HPI • Student includes PE findings • Lacks basic history taking • Missing pertinent positives and negatives | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOBJECTIVE: Physical exam includes appropriate areas based on the pertinent history (subjective). | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Documents most pertinent examination components. • Misses 1-3 components • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Physical examination cursory • misses several pertinent components • Includes unnecessary systems in the documentation • Does not utilize the screening tools | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeASSESSMENT: Primary diagnosis and differential diagnoses are identified and supported by rationales; correct ICD codes provided, and appropriate diagnostic tests are ordered. | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses with ICD codes are supported by findings and ruled out • Appropriate tests ordered and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses are identified but 1-2 are not supported by findings. ICD codes included • Missing <1-2 appropriate tests ordered, and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Incorrect primary does not provide a rationale and incorrect ICD code • <3 differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings • Inappropriate tests ordered • Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMEDICATION: Ordered (including over the counter) are appropriate, evidenced based, written as a complete prescription. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient**• Student appropriately writes the correct medication as a prescription • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent**• Student misses 1-2 components of medication order • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice**• Student identifies the incorrect medication • Student does not appropriately calculate the correct doses and route | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLAN: Comprehensive plan to address the diagnosis should include the following: • Appropriate interventions & referrals (if needed) • Pt education • SDOH • Health promotion/anticipatory guidance | **20 to >12.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written plan covering all critical components proper intervention, including referrals for the patient’s final diagnosis • Student addresses 6 components of SDOH • Student includes 4 health maintenance • Comprehensive patient education is included related to current health visit, must list 5. • Supported 3 by peer-reviewed literature<br> <br>**12 to >8.0 ptsCompetent**• Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis • Some aspects of SDOH are addressed • Some aspects of Health Promotion/anticipatory guidance are addressed. • Patient education is present but missing 1 or 2 key pieces of information • Supported by only 2 peer reviewed literature<br> <br>**8 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient's diagnosis • There are missing aspects of SDOH • There are missing aspects health promotion anticipatory guidance • Patient education is missing many aspects related to current visit • Supported by less than 2 peer reviewed literature | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFOLLOW-UP: Instructions | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Follow up instructions are complete and include time to next visit and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Follow up instructions are generally complete but missing 1 or 2 aspects • Symptoms that would prompt a return visit sooner are included but some are missing<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice**• Follow up instructions are missing important timing aspects • Symptoms prompting return visit sooner are incomplete or missing | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOFFICE BILLING/VISIT CODE: CPT CODES | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient**• Student identifies the correct office billing code • Student identifies the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Student does not correctly identify the correct office billing code • Student does not correctly identify the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the billing and CPT codes. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Guidelines | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Student identifies the clinical guidelines utilized and rationale.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent** Student identifies the clinical guidelines but does not provide a rationale.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the clinical guidelines. | 5 pts |

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## pedsihumanweek4.docx**

    i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions or respiratory conditions

    ![A person touching a child's mouth Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/peds-ihuman)

    Welcome to another i-Human Case Study. Take a moment to imagine a child and family you might meet. Based on the Learning Resources for this week, consider eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT); and respiratory conditions you may identify frequently as a Family Nurse Practitioner and those that may be more unusual. Also consider what aspects of the exam process might be more challenging for you—assessing, evaluating, providing multiple diagnoses, treatments, or offering the patient and family management advice. Work to be mindful of how to take best advantage of the simulated i-Human exam to prepare for pediatric patients with EENT and respiratory conditions.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/items/7099054)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider how to apply knowledge of EENT and respiratory conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.

    · Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    · Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    · Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    · Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    · Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with EENT conditions and their families.

    **Assignment:**

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the
    _i-Human Graduate Programs Help_ link within the i-Human platform.

    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

    You will access i-Human from the
    **Access i-Human** link located in the
    [Start Here module](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/1352528).

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMPLETION of the iHuman: Students must complete the required sections: • PE • key findings • differential diagnoses • test summary. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Student successfully completed all required sections in iHuman.<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent** Student missed completing 1-2 of the required sections.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not complete the iHuman required components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSUBJECTIVE: Complete HPI including all 8 aspects and pertinent information related to chief complaint, including the pertinent positives & negatives | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written chief complaint • HPI well written including all aspects of OLDCARTS/LOCATES • Includes pertinent positives & negatives<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Clearly written chief complaint • Misses 1-2 key components from the history • Missing pertinent positives and negatives<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written HPI • Student includes PE findings • Lacks basic history taking • Missing pertinent positives and negatives | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOBJECTIVE: Physical exam includes appropriate areas based on the pertinent history (subjective). | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Documents most pertinent examination components. • Misses 1-3 components • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Physical examination cursory • misses several pertinent components • Includes unnecessary systems in the documentation • Does not utilize the screening tools | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeASSESSMENT: Primary diagnosis and differential diagnoses are identified and supported by rationales; correct ICD codes provided, and appropriate diagnostic tests are ordered. | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses with ICD codes are supported by findings and ruled out • Appropriate tests ordered and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses are identified but 1-2 are not supported by findings. ICD codes included • Missing <1-2 appropriate tests ordered, and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Incorrect primary does not provide a rationale and incorrect ICD code • <3 differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings • Inappropriate tests ordered • Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMEDICATION: Ordered (including over the counter) are appropriate, evidenced based, written as a complete prescription. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient**• Student appropriately writes the correct medication as a prescription • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent**• Student misses 1-2 components of medication order • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice**• Student identifies the incorrect medication • Student does not appropriately calculate the correct doses and route | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLAN: Comprehensive plan to address the diagnosis should include the following: • Appropriate interventions & referrals (if needed) • Pt education • SDOH • Health promotion/anticipatory guidance | **20 to >12.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written plan covering all critical components proper intervention, including referrals for the patient’s final diagnosis • Student addresses 6 components of SDOH • Student includes 4 health maintenance • Comprehensive patient education is included related to current health visit, must list 5. • Supported 3 by peer-reviewed literature<br> <br>**12 to >8.0 ptsCompetent**• Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis • Some aspects of SDOH are addressed • Some aspects of Health Promotion/anticipatory guidance are addressed. • Patient education is present but missing 1 or 2 key pieces of information • Supported by only 2 peer reviewed literature<br> <br>**8 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient's diagnosis • There are missing aspects of SDOH • There are missing aspects health promotion anticipatory guidance • Patient education is missing many aspects related to current visit • Supported by less than 2 peer reviewed literature | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFOLLOW-UP: Instructions | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Follow up instructions are complete and include time to next visit and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Follow up instructions are generally complete but missing 1 or 2 aspects • Symptoms that would prompt a return visit sooner are included but some are missing<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice**• Follow up instructions are missing important timing aspects • Symptoms prompting return visit sooner are incomplete or missing | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOFFICE BILLING/VISIT CODE: CPT CODES | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient**• Student identifies the correct office billing code • Student identifies the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Student does not correctly identify the correct office billing code • Student does not correctly identify the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the billing and CPT codes. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Guidelines | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Student identifies the clinical guidelines utilized and rationale.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent** Student identifies the clinical guidelines but does not provide a rationale.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the clinical guidelines. | 5 pts |

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## pedssoapnoteexample.docx**

    **Students must paste their SOAP note under the management plan section of the iHuman system.**

    Dear Student,

    Please make sure to write your SOAP note directly in the Management Plan section within the iHuman platform. It is important that all work is completed within iHuman. Any Word document attachments will not be accepted or graded, so be sure to submit everything through the appropriate platform.

    Thank you for your attention to this.*********************************

    **SUBJECTIVE (15 pts):**

    **CC:** “2-3 word description” (1 point)

    **HPI:** **Must write as a paragraph. NO BULLET POINTS. See example. ((10 points)

    All: (1 point)

    PMH: (1 point)

    FMH: (1 point)

    MEDS: (1 point)

    **OBJECTIVE (15 pts): Only include the pertinent systems. Note that CV/Pulm should always be included in all PE.**

    VS: (1 point)

    PE: (see example if needed) (10 points)

    Diagnostic Test/labs done: (4 points)

    **Assessment (15 pts):**

    Primary Diagnosis & ICD code: (2 points) Rationale (4 points)

    i.
    **_DDX#1 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    ii.
    **_DDX#2 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    iii.
    **_DDX#3 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    **MEDICATION (10 pts) WRITE as a prescription. Review how to write a prescription.**

    MEDICATION NAME: (include proper name and strength)

    SIG: (this is the directions)

    DISP: (this is how many you are giving)

    RF: (any refills)

    **PLAN: 20 points (ALL areas must be included.)**

    **Appropriate Interventions & Referrals: (8 points) ****
    **_See example SOAP note if unclear** This section should discuss what you did for the patient during the visit. Key exams required that you did to arrive at the diagnosis. Referrals needed?_**

    **Tell me what you did w/ this child in the office (breakdown below; all areas must be included)**

    · -What Intervention(s)/ treatment(s) in office: (for example-02, sutures, teach to use crutches, Tylenol, (4 Points)

    · -Screening tool(s) used: (1 Point)

    · -Referral(s) w rational: (1 point) IF NONE, write NONE do not skip

    · -Address modifiable risk factors: eg stop smoking, reduce screen time, etc (2 points)

    **Pt. education (5 points)-** – Educate parent and patient about today’s visit/diagnosis/meds etc. Must list a minimum of 5 patient education regarding today’s visit.

    1. Pt Ed #1

    2. Pt Ed #2

    3. Pt Ed #3

    4. Pt Ed #4

    5. Pt Ed #5

    **SDOH:** **address all 6 areas of social determinants of health (3 points)**

    1) Economic Stability-

    2) Neighborhood-

    3) Education-

    4) Food Access-

    5) Community and Social Context

    6) Healthcare System: .

    **Health Promotion/Anticipatory guidance: (4 points)**

    Must list a minimum of 4 related to child’s age. Do not simply write f/u on vaccinations, be specific. Use your Bright Futures to help you with this area. *
    **This is not pt education* See examples.**

    1) Health Promotion #1

    2) Health Promotion #2

    3) Health Promotion #3

    4) Health Promotion #4

    **Follow-up**: (5 points)

    a.
    **Timing/when: (1 points); Next WCV (1 pt)**

    b.
    **Symptom to watch for that will prompt a return (red flags): (3points)**

    **Office BILLING/VISIT CODE and CPT CODES (5 pts)**

    **Clinical Guidelines: 5 points**

    a. Name of guidelines: (1 points)

    b. What does the guidelines tell you to do, or how to make a diagnosis (4 points)

    REFERENCES (USE APA)

    **REFERENCES: SUBJECTED TO UP TO 5 POINT DEDUCTION IF NOT CITED IN YOUR TEXT**

    **_Must have 3 and must show that it is cited within your text. Please understand that references provide the information necessary for readers to identify and retrieve each work_** [_cited in the text._](https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapastyle.apa.org%2Fstyle-grammar-guidelines%2Fcitations&data=05%7C02%7Cannaliza.villena%40mail.waldenu.edu%7C832a90a179db41139bc308dd60483251%7C97fb1a0766ed498398cd2b41977edc25%7C0%7C0%7C638772585398859193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UhV7qx7TQZZBb89yZJEmRRFhIFMty9rI1NAurEaSISQ%3D&reserved=0) **_If your references are not cited within your text, then points will be deducted._**

    **NO MAYO CLINIC, no pt. education websites, CDC should only be for stats. REFERENCES must be peer-reviewed literature. Please utilize the Walden Library. Use primary sources.

    **## pedsihumanweek4.docx**

    i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions or respiratory conditions

    ![A person touching a child's mouth Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/peds-ihuman)

    Welcome to another i-Human Case Study. Take a moment to imagine a child and family you might meet. Based on the Learning Resources for this week, consider eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT); and respiratory conditions you may identify frequently as a Family Nurse Practitioner and those that may be more unusual. Also consider what aspects of the exam process might be more challenging for you—assessing, evaluating, providing multiple diagnoses, treatments, or offering the patient and family management advice. Work to be mindful of how to take best advantage of the simulated i-Human exam to prepare for pediatric patients with EENT and respiratory conditions.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/items/7099054)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider how to apply knowledge of EENT and respiratory conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.

    · Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    · Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    · Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    · Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    · Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with EENT conditions and their families.

    **Assignment:**

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the
    _i-Human Graduate Programs Help_ link within the i-Human platform.

    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

    You will access i-Human from the
    **Access i-Human** link located in the
    [Start Here module](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/1352528).

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMPLETION of the iHuman: Students must complete the required sections: • PE • key findings • differential diagnoses • test summary. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Student successfully completed all required sections in iHuman.<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent** Student missed completing 1-2 of the required sections.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not complete the iHuman required components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSUBJECTIVE: Complete HPI including all 8 aspects and pertinent information related to chief complaint, including the pertinent positives & negatives | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written chief complaint • HPI well written including all aspects of OLDCARTS/LOCATES • Includes pertinent positives & negatives<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Clearly written chief complaint • Misses 1-2 key components from the history • Missing pertinent positives and negatives<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written HPI • Student includes PE findings • Lacks basic history taking • Missing pertinent positives and negatives | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOBJECTIVE: Physical exam includes appropriate areas based on the pertinent history (subjective). | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Documents most pertinent examination components. • Misses 1-3 components • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Physical examination cursory • misses several pertinent components • Includes unnecessary systems in the documentation • Does not utilize the screening tools | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeASSESSMENT: Primary diagnosis and differential diagnoses are identified and supported by rationales; correct ICD codes provided, and appropriate diagnostic tests are ordered. | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses with ICD codes are supported by findings and ruled out • Appropriate tests ordered and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses are identified but 1-2 are not supported by findings. ICD codes included • Missing <1-2 appropriate tests ordered, and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Incorrect primary does not provide a rationale and incorrect ICD code • <3 differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings • Inappropriate tests ordered • Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMEDICATION: Ordered (including over the counter) are appropriate, evidenced based, written as a complete prescription. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient**• Student appropriately writes the correct medication as a prescription • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent**• Student misses 1-2 components of medication order • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice**• Student identifies the incorrect medication • Student does not appropriately calculate the correct doses and route | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLAN: Comprehensive plan to address the diagnosis should include the following: • Appropriate interventions & referrals (if needed) • Pt education • SDOH • Health promotion/anticipatory guidance | **20 to >12.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written plan covering all critical components proper intervention, including referrals for the patient’s final diagnosis • Student addresses 6 components of SDOH • Student includes 4 health maintenance • Comprehensive patient education is included related to current health visit, must list 5. • Supported 3 by peer-reviewed literature<br> <br>**12 to >8.0 ptsCompetent**• Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis • Some aspects of SDOH are addressed • Some aspects of Health Promotion/anticipatory guidance are addressed. • Patient education is present but missing 1 or 2 key pieces of information • Supported by only 2 peer reviewed literature<br> <br>**8 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient's diagnosis • There are missing aspects of SDOH • There are missing aspects health promotion anticipatory guidance • Patient education is missing many aspects related to current visit • Supported by less than 2 peer reviewed literature | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFOLLOW-UP: Instructions | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Follow up instructions are complete and include time to next visit and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Follow up instructions are generally complete but missing 1 or 2 aspects • Symptoms that would prompt a return visit sooner are included but some are missing<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice**• Follow up instructions are missing important timing aspects • Symptoms prompting return visit sooner are incomplete or missing | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOFFICE BILLING/VISIT CODE: CPT CODES | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient**• Student identifies the correct office billing code • Student identifies the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Student does not correctly identify the correct office billing code • Student does not correctly identify the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the billing and CPT codes. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Guidelines | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Student identifies the clinical guidelines utilized and rationale.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent** Student identifies the clinical guidelines but does not provide a rationale.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the clinical guidelines. | 5 pts |

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## pedssoapnoteexample.docx**

    **Students must paste their SOAP note under the management plan section of the iHuman system.**

    Dear Student,

    Please make sure to write your SOAP note directly in the Management Plan section within the iHuman platform. It is important that all work is completed within iHuman. Any Word document attachments will not be accepted or graded, so be sure to submit everything through the appropriate platform.

    Thank you for your attention to this.*********************************

    **SUBJECTIVE (15 pts):**

    **CC:** “2-3 word description” (1 point)

    **HPI:** **Must write as a paragraph. NO BULLET POINTS. See example. ((10 points)

    All: (1 point)

    PMH: (1 point)

    FMH: (1 point)

    MEDS: (1 point)

    **OBJECTIVE (15 pts): Only include the pertinent systems. Note that CV/Pulm should always be included in all PE.**

    VS: (1 point)

    PE: (see example if needed) (10 points)

    Diagnostic Test/labs done: (4 points)

    **Assessment (15 pts):**

    Primary Diagnosis & ICD code: (2 points) Rationale (4 points)

    i.
    **_DDX#1 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    ii.
    **_DDX#2 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    iii.
    **_DDX#3 w ICD code and rational_** _(3 points)_

    **MEDICATION (10 pts) WRITE as a prescription. Review how to write a prescription.**

    MEDICATION NAME: (include proper name and strength)

    SIG: (this is the directions)

    DISP: (this is how many you are giving)

    RF: (any refills)

    **PLAN: 20 points (ALL areas must be included.)**

    **Appropriate Interventions & Referrals: (8 points) ****
    **_See example SOAP note if unclear** This section should discuss what you did for the patient during the visit. Key exams required that you did to arrive at the diagnosis. Referrals needed?_**

    **Tell me what you did w/ this child in the office (breakdown below; all areas must be included)**

    · -What Intervention(s)/ treatment(s) in office: (for example-02, sutures, teach to use crutches, Tylenol, (4 Points)

    · -Screening tool(s) used: (1 Point)

    · -Referral(s) w rational: (1 point) IF NONE, write NONE do not skip

    · -Address modifiable risk factors: eg stop smoking, reduce screen time, etc (2 points)

    **Pt. education (5 points)-** – Educate parent and patient about today’s visit/diagnosis/meds etc. Must list a minimum of 5 patient education regarding today’s visit.

    1. Pt Ed #1

    2. Pt Ed #2

    3. Pt Ed #3

    4. Pt Ed #4

    5. Pt Ed #5

    **SDOH:** **address all 6 areas of social determinants of health (3 points)**

    1) Economic Stability-

    2) Neighborhood-

    3) Education-

    4) Food Access-

    5) Community and Social Context

    6) Healthcare System: .

    **Health Promotion/Anticipatory guidance: (4 points)**

    Must list a minimum of 4 related to child’s age. Do not simply write f/u on vaccinations, be specific. Use your Bright Futures to help you with this area. *
    **This is not pt education* See examples.**

    1) Health Promotion #1

    2) Health Promotion #2

    3) Health Promotion #3

    4) Health Promotion #4

    **Follow-up**: (5 points)

    a.
    **Timing/when: (1 points); Next WCV (1 pt)**

    b.
    **Symptom to watch for that will prompt a return (red flags): (3points)**

    **Office BILLING/VISIT CODE and CPT CODES (5 pts)**

    **Clinical Guidelines: 5 points**

    a. Name of guidelines: (1 points)

    b. What does the guidelines tell you to do, or how to make a diagnosis (4 points)

    REFERENCES (USE APA)

    **REFERENCES: SUBJECTED TO UP TO 5 POINT DEDUCTION IF NOT CITED IN YOUR TEXT**

    **_Must have 3 and must show that it is cited within your text. Please understand that references provide the information necessary for readers to identify and retrieve each work_** [_cited in the text._](https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapastyle.apa.org%2Fstyle-grammar-guidelines%2Fcitations&data=05%7C02%7Cannaliza.villena%40mail.waldenu.edu%7C832a90a179db41139bc308dd60483251%7C97fb1a0766ed498398cd2b41977edc25%7C0%7C0%7C638772585398859193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UhV7qx7TQZZBb89yZJEmRRFhIFMty9rI1NAurEaSISQ%3D&reserved=0) **_If your references are not cited within your text, then points will be deducted._**

    **NO MAYO CLINIC, no pt. education websites, CDC should only be for stats. REFERENCES must be peer-reviewed literature. Please utilize the Walden Library. Use primary sources.

    **## pedsihumanweek4.docx**

    i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions or respiratory conditions

    ![A person touching a child's mouth Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/peds-ihuman)

    Welcome to another i-Human Case Study. Take a moment to imagine a child and family you might meet. Based on the Learning Resources for this week, consider eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT); and respiratory conditions you may identify frequently as a Family Nurse Practitioner and those that may be more unusual. Also consider what aspects of the exam process might be more challenging for you—assessing, evaluating, providing multiple diagnoses, treatments, or offering the patient and family management advice. Work to be mindful of how to take best advantage of the simulated i-Human exam to prepare for pediatric patients with EENT and respiratory conditions.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/items/7099054)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider how to apply knowledge of EENT and respiratory conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.

    · Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    · Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    · Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    · Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    · Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with EENT conditions and their families.

    **Assignment:**

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the
    _i-Human Graduate Programs Help_ link within the i-Human platform.

    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

    You will access i-Human from the
    **Access i-Human** link located in the
    [Start Here module](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172027/modules/1352528).

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6541_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMPLETION of the iHuman: Students must complete the required sections: • PE • key findings • differential diagnoses • test summary. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Student successfully completed all required sections in iHuman.<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent** Student missed completing 1-2 of the required sections.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not complete the iHuman required components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSUBJECTIVE: Complete HPI including all 8 aspects and pertinent information related to chief complaint, including the pertinent positives & negatives | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written chief complaint • HPI well written including all aspects of OLDCARTS/LOCATES • Includes pertinent positives & negatives<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Clearly written chief complaint • Misses 1-2 key components from the history • Missing pertinent positives and negatives<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written HPI • Student includes PE findings • Lacks basic history taking • Missing pertinent positives and negatives | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOBJECTIVE: Physical exam includes appropriate areas based on the pertinent history (subjective). | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Documents most pertinent examination components. • Misses 1-3 components • Does not include unnecessary systems in the documentation • Utilizes the correct screening tools<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Physical examination cursory • misses several pertinent components • Includes unnecessary systems in the documentation • Does not utilize the screening tools | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeASSESSMENT: Primary diagnosis and differential diagnoses are identified and supported by rationales; correct ICD codes provided, and appropriate diagnostic tests are ordered. | **15 to >9.0 ptsProficient**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses with ICD codes are supported by findings and ruled out • Appropriate tests ordered and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**9 to >3.0 ptsCompetent**• Identifies the primary diagnosis with rationale and the correct ICD • 3 differential diagnoses are identified but 1-2 are not supported by findings. ICD codes included • Missing <1-2 appropriate tests ordered, and results documented • Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsNovice**• Incorrect primary does not provide a rationale and incorrect ICD code • <3 differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings • Inappropriate tests ordered • Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMEDICATION: Ordered (including over the counter) are appropriate, evidenced based, written as a complete prescription. | **10 to >6.0 ptsProficient**• Student appropriately writes the correct medication as a prescription • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**6 to >2.0 ptsCompetent**• Student misses 1-2 components of medication order • Student appropriately calculates the correct doses and route<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsNovice**• Student identifies the incorrect medication • Student does not appropriately calculate the correct doses and route | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLAN: Comprehensive plan to address the diagnosis should include the following: • Appropriate interventions & referrals (if needed) • Pt education • SDOH • Health promotion/anticipatory guidance | **20 to >12.0 ptsProficient**• Clearly written plan covering all critical components proper intervention, including referrals for the patient’s final diagnosis • Student addresses 6 components of SDOH • Student includes 4 health maintenance • Comprehensive patient education is included related to current health visit, must list 5. • Supported 3 by peer-reviewed literature<br> <br>**12 to >8.0 ptsCompetent**• Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis • Some aspects of SDOH are addressed • Some aspects of Health Promotion/anticipatory guidance are addressed. • Patient education is present but missing 1 or 2 key pieces of information • Supported by only 2 peer reviewed literature<br> <br>**8 to >0 ptsNovice**• Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient's diagnosis • There are missing aspects of SDOH • There are missing aspects health promotion anticipatory guidance • Patient education is missing many aspects related to current visit • Supported by less than 2 peer reviewed literature | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFOLLOW-UP: Instructions | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Follow up instructions are complete and include time to next visit and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Follow up instructions are generally complete but missing 1 or 2 aspects • Symptoms that would prompt a return visit sooner are included but some are missing<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice**• Follow up instructions are missing important timing aspects • Symptoms prompting return visit sooner are incomplete or missing | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOFFICE BILLING/VISIT CODE: CPT CODES | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient**• Student identifies the correct office billing code • Student identifies the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent**• Student does not correctly identify the correct office billing code • Student does not correctly identify the correct CPT codes<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the billing and CPT codes. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Guidelines | **5 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Student identifies the clinical guidelines utilized and rationale.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsCompetent** Student identifies the clinical guidelines but does not provide a rationale.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsNovice** Student does not address the clinical guidelines. | 5 pts |

    ## image1.jpeg

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] A Better South Carolina

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    everything attached – ## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip – ## Document1.docx **## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip** ## Discussion Good Topics and Better Topics.html ## Overview Most of us can think of something to talk about when pressed to do so. However, some topics gener…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    everything attached

    – ## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip

    – ## Document1.docx

    **## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip**

    ## Discussion Good Topics and Better Topics.html

    ## Overview

    Most of us can think of something to talk about when pressed to do so. However, some topics generate better discussions than others.

    ### Purpose

    Distinguish the difference between good and better topics for research-based argumentative essays by exploring the proper questions

    ### Assignment Details

    While reading and viewing the "Selecting a Topic" and "Developing a Research Question"  from
    [GW Libguides modules](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=content&rcode=MTC-5442548) (menu located on the left side of the libguide homepage), please think about the following ideas and questions:

    – What am I interested in that might be a good topic for MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina
    – Is my potential topic mostly belief or opinion based (i.e can it be reasonably supported beyond personal feelings)?
    – How can I turn a potential topic into a debatable, researchable question?
    – How can I narrow the topic down to create more focused research?
    – Who would be interested in this topic besides me?
    – What are some open-ended questions (How and Why type questions) related to the topic?
    – What are good sources of research to support my ideas? Be specific with titles of organizations and/or other types of authorities who are considered experts in the area you are exploring.

    After reading and viewing the modules, post your response to these ideas including a possible topic or two in 300+ words.

    ### Classmate response

    Read a few of your classmate's responses and comment in 100+ words on at least two of them in regards to the viability of their possible topic.

    – If the topic seems viable, offer some insight as to how they could support their position and/or how they could focus the topic if it could be focused.
    – If the topic does not seem viable, offer some insight as to how it could become a better idea for argument. A critique should be helpful and considerate- not demoralizing.

    #### Submit Posts

    When you are ready submit posts to the discussion "
    [Good questions make good topics"](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=discuss&rcode=MTC-5718896)

    [Go to top](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/a-better-south-carolina#top)

    **## Document1.docx**

    What I need to be done and guidelines are in the attachment. The website that was mention is also below. The 2 classmate post is also listed below. I work in health so if you want to do something in the medical or about health but I'm cool with that or whatever you choose to write about.

    Classmate 1

    When choosing a topic for a research essay like MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina, it’s important to go beyond personal opinions and select issues that are researchable. A “good” topic might be something I’m passionate about, but a “better” topic is one that can spark public interest.

    For example, I’m interested in improving education in South Carolina. I might ask: How can South Carolina improve teacher retention rates in rural school districts? This is a better topic because it presents a specific problem, invites debate, and can be supported by data from credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education.

    For example, mental health has become a growing concern, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. How can South Carolina increase access to school-based mental health services for high school students? This topic is supported by data from the South Carolina Department of Mental Health. It would interest parents, educators, and healthcare professionals.

    Others who would be interested in this topic include educators, school administrators, and parents. Open-ended questions that's from this topic include: Why are teachers leaving rural schools in South Carolina? and How can state policy better support these schools and their communities?

    Some sources for research would include South Carolina Department of Education reports, Education Week, The Brookings Institution , National Education Association , Local newspapers such as The State or The Post and Courier

    Another possible topic could be: How can expanding affordable housing in South Carolina reduce homelessness and improve public health? This issue is similarly rich with potential for debate, policy impact, and research depth.

    classmate 2

    One topic I’d like to write about for MA 2 is whether or not South Carolina high schools should make financial literacy a required class. I’ve always thought it was crazy that we spend years in school but never learn how to handle basic money skills like budgeting, saving, or how credit works. I think a class like this could help students once they graduate and have to make financial decisions on their own.

    This topic isn’t just about personal opinion. There’s actual research behind it. For example, some states already require financial literacy courses, and studies show students from those states tend to make smarter money choices later. I’d definitely want to include that in my paper to show that this issue goes beyond just what I think.

    To make this idea more research-focused, I could ask a question like: What would be the long-term impact if South Carolina made personal finance a required high school course? That way, I can look at things like student outcomes, economic benefits, and even public support. I could also narrow it down by focusing on how this kind of education might help students in low-income areas.

    This topic could probably interest many besides me, including parents and employers who want financially responsible workers. Some open-ended questions I might explore are: Why don’t more schools already teach this? How could adding this class change things for future generations of students?

    As far as research goes, I’d look at credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education, the National Endowment for Financial Education, the Council for Economic Education, and local news sources. Overall, this feels like a topic that matters for real people and could help make a positive difference in South Carolina.

    https://libguides.gwu.edu/research

    **## Document1.docx**

    What I need to be done and guidelines are in the attachment. The website that was mention is also below. The 2 classmate post is also listed below. I work in health so if you want to do something in the medical or about health but I'm cool with that or whatever you choose to write about.

    Classmate 1

    When choosing a topic for a research essay like MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina, it’s important to go beyond personal opinions and select issues that are researchable. A “good” topic might be something I’m passionate about, but a “better” topic is one that can spark public interest.

    For example, I’m interested in improving education in South Carolina. I might ask: How can South Carolina improve teacher retention rates in rural school districts? This is a better topic because it presents a specific problem, invites debate, and can be supported by data from credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education.

    For example, mental health has become a growing concern, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. How can South Carolina increase access to school-based mental health services for high school students? This topic is supported by data from the South Carolina Department of Mental Health. It would interest parents, educators, and healthcare professionals.

    Others who would be interested in this topic include educators, school administrators, and parents. Open-ended questions that's from this topic include: Why are teachers leaving rural schools in South Carolina? and How can state policy better support these schools and their communities?

    Some sources for research would include South Carolina Department of Education reports, Education Week, The Brookings Institution , National Education Association , Local newspapers such as The State or The Post and Courier

    Another possible topic could be: How can expanding affordable housing in South Carolina reduce homelessness and improve public health? This issue is similarly rich with potential for debate, policy impact, and research depth.

    classmate 2

    One topic I’d like to write about for MA 2 is whether or not South Carolina high schools should make financial literacy a required class. I’ve always thought it was crazy that we spend years in school but never learn how to handle basic money skills like budgeting, saving, or how credit works. I think a class like this could help students once they graduate and have to make financial decisions on their own.

    This topic isn’t just about personal opinion. There’s actual research behind it. For example, some states already require financial literacy courses, and studies show students from those states tend to make smarter money choices later. I’d definitely want to include that in my paper to show that this issue goes beyond just what I think.

    To make this idea more research-focused, I could ask a question like: What would be the long-term impact if South Carolina made personal finance a required high school course? That way, I can look at things like student outcomes, economic benefits, and even public support. I could also narrow it down by focusing on how this kind of education might help students in low-income areas.

    This topic could probably interest many besides me, including parents and employers who want financially responsible workers. Some open-ended questions I might explore are: Why don’t more schools already teach this? How could adding this class change things for future generations of students?

    As far as research goes, I’d look at credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education, the National Endowment for Financial Education, the Council for Economic Education, and local news sources. Overall, this feels like a topic that matters for real people and could help make a positive difference in South Carolina.

    https://libguides.gwu.edu/research

    **## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip**

    ## Discussion Good Topics and Better Topics.html

    ## Overview

    Most of us can think of something to talk about when pressed to do so. However, some topics generate better discussions than others.

    ### Purpose

    Distinguish the difference between good and better topics for research-based argumentative essays by exploring the proper questions

    ### Assignment Details

    While reading and viewing the "Selecting a Topic" and "Developing a Research Question"  from
    [GW Libguides modules](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=content&rcode=MTC-5442548) (menu located on the left side of the libguide homepage), please think about the following ideas and questions:

    – What am I interested in that might be a good topic for MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina
    – Is my potential topic mostly belief or opinion based (i.e can it be reasonably supported beyond personal feelings)?
    – How can I turn a potential topic into a debatable, researchable question?
    – How can I narrow the topic down to create more focused research?
    – Who would be interested in this topic besides me?
    – What are some open-ended questions (How and Why type questions) related to the topic?
    – What are good sources of research to support my ideas? Be specific with titles of organizations and/or other types of authorities who are considered experts in the area you are exploring.

    After reading and viewing the modules, post your response to these ideas including a possible topic or two in 300+ words.

    ### Classmate response

    Read a few of your classmate's responses and comment in 100+ words on at least two of them in regards to the viability of their possible topic.

    – If the topic seems viable, offer some insight as to how they could support their position and/or how they could focus the topic if it could be focused.
    – If the topic does not seem viable, offer some insight as to how it could become a better idea for argument. A critique should be helpful and considerate- not demoralizing.

    #### Submit Posts

    When you are ready submit posts to the discussion "
    [Good questions make good topics"](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=discuss&rcode=MTC-5718896)

    [Go to top](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/a-better-south-carolina#top)

    **## Document1.docx**

    What I need to be done and guidelines are in the attachment. The website that was mention is also below. The 2 classmate post is also listed below. I work in health so if you want to do something in the medical or about health but I'm cool with that or whatever you choose to write about.

    Classmate 1

    When choosing a topic for a research essay like MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina, it’s important to go beyond personal opinions and select issues that are researchable. A “good” topic might be something I’m passionate about, but a “better” topic is one that can spark public interest.

    For example, I’m interested in improving education in South Carolina. I might ask: How can South Carolina improve teacher retention rates in rural school districts? This is a better topic because it presents a specific problem, invites debate, and can be supported by data from credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education.

    For example, mental health has become a growing concern, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. How can South Carolina increase access to school-based mental health services for high school students? This topic is supported by data from the South Carolina Department of Mental Health. It would interest parents, educators, and healthcare professionals.

    Others who would be interested in this topic include educators, school administrators, and parents. Open-ended questions that's from this topic include: Why are teachers leaving rural schools in South Carolina? and How can state policy better support these schools and their communities?

    Some sources for research would include South Carolina Department of Education reports, Education Week, The Brookings Institution , National Education Association , Local newspapers such as The State or The Post and Courier

    Another possible topic could be: How can expanding affordable housing in South Carolina reduce homelessness and improve public health? This issue is similarly rich with potential for debate, policy impact, and research depth.

    classmate 2

    One topic I’d like to write about for MA 2 is whether or not South Carolina high schools should make financial literacy a required class. I’ve always thought it was crazy that we spend years in school but never learn how to handle basic money skills like budgeting, saving, or how credit works. I think a class like this could help students once they graduate and have to make financial decisions on their own.

    This topic isn’t just about personal opinion. There’s actual research behind it. For example, some states already require financial literacy courses, and studies show students from those states tend to make smarter money choices later. I’d definitely want to include that in my paper to show that this issue goes beyond just what I think.

    To make this idea more research-focused, I could ask a question like: What would be the long-term impact if South Carolina made personal finance a required high school course? That way, I can look at things like student outcomes, economic benefits, and even public support. I could also narrow it down by focusing on how this kind of education might help students in low-income areas.

    This topic could probably interest many besides me, including parents and employers who want financially responsible workers. Some open-ended questions I might explore are: Why don’t more schools already teach this? How could adding this class change things for future generations of students?

    As far as research goes, I’d look at credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education, the National Endowment for Financial Education, the Council for Economic Education, and local news sources. Overall, this feels like a topic that matters for real people and could help make a positive difference in South Carolina.

    https://libguides.gwu.edu/research

    **## DiscussionGoodTopicsandBetterTopics.html.zip**

    ## Discussion Good Topics and Better Topics.html

    ## Overview

    Most of us can think of something to talk about when pressed to do so. However, some topics generate better discussions than others.

    ### Purpose

    Distinguish the difference between good and better topics for research-based argumentative essays by exploring the proper questions

    ### Assignment Details

    While reading and viewing the "Selecting a Topic" and "Developing a Research Question"  from
    [GW Libguides modules](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=content&rcode=MTC-5442548) (menu located on the left side of the libguide homepage), please think about the following ideas and questions:

    – What am I interested in that might be a good topic for MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina
    – Is my potential topic mostly belief or opinion based (i.e can it be reasonably supported beyond personal feelings)?
    – How can I turn a potential topic into a debatable, researchable question?
    – How can I narrow the topic down to create more focused research?
    – Who would be interested in this topic besides me?
    – What are some open-ended questions (How and Why type questions) related to the topic?
    – What are good sources of research to support my ideas? Be specific with titles of organizations and/or other types of authorities who are considered experts in the area you are exploring.

    After reading and viewing the modules, post your response to these ideas including a possible topic or two in 300+ words.

    ### Classmate response

    Read a few of your classmate's responses and comment in 100+ words on at least two of them in regards to the viability of their possible topic.

    – If the topic seems viable, offer some insight as to how they could support their position and/or how they could focus the topic if it could be focused.
    – If the topic does not seem viable, offer some insight as to how it could become a better idea for argument. A critique should be helpful and considerate- not demoralizing.

    #### Submit Posts

    When you are ready submit posts to the discussion "
    [Good questions make good topics"](https://www.sweetstudy.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1178867&type=discuss&rcode=MTC-5718896)

    [Go to top](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/a-better-south-carolina#top)

    **## Document1.docx**

    What I need to be done and guidelines are in the attachment. The website that was mention is also below. The 2 classmate post is also listed below. I work in health so if you want to do something in the medical or about health but I'm cool with that or whatever you choose to write about.

    Classmate 1

    When choosing a topic for a research essay like MA 2: Building a Better South Carolina, it’s important to go beyond personal opinions and select issues that are researchable. A “good” topic might be something I’m passionate about, but a “better” topic is one that can spark public interest.

    For example, I’m interested in improving education in South Carolina. I might ask: How can South Carolina improve teacher retention rates in rural school districts? This is a better topic because it presents a specific problem, invites debate, and can be supported by data from credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education.

    For example, mental health has become a growing concern, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. How can South Carolina increase access to school-based mental health services for high school students? This topic is supported by data from the South Carolina Department of Mental Health. It would interest parents, educators, and healthcare professionals.

    Others who would be interested in this topic include educators, school administrators, and parents. Open-ended questions that's from this topic include: Why are teachers leaving rural schools in South Carolina? and How can state policy better support these schools and their communities?

    Some sources for research would include South Carolina Department of Education reports, Education Week, The Brookings Institution , National Education Association , Local newspapers such as The State or The Post and Courier

    Another possible topic could be: How can expanding affordable housing in South Carolina reduce homelessness and improve public health? This issue is similarly rich with potential for debate, policy impact, and research depth.

    classmate 2

    One topic I’d like to write about for MA 2 is whether or not South Carolina high schools should make financial literacy a required class. I’ve always thought it was crazy that we spend years in school but never learn how to handle basic money skills like budgeting, saving, or how credit works. I think a class like this could help students once they graduate and have to make financial decisions on their own.

    This topic isn’t just about personal opinion. There’s actual research behind it. For example, some states already require financial literacy courses, and studies show students from those states tend to make smarter money choices later. I’d definitely want to include that in my paper to show that this issue goes beyond just what I think.

    To make this idea more research-focused, I could ask a question like: What would be the long-term impact if South Carolina made personal finance a required high school course? That way, I can look at things like student outcomes, economic benefits, and even public support. I could also narrow it down by focusing on how this kind of education might help students in low-income areas.

    This topic could probably interest many besides me, including parents and employers who want financially responsible workers. Some open-ended questions I might explore are: Why don’t more schools already teach this? How could adding this class change things for future generations of students?

    As far as research goes, I’d look at credible sources like the South Carolina Department of Education, the National Endowment for Financial Education, the Council for Economic Education, and local news sources. Overall, this feels like a topic that matters for real people and could help make a positive difference in South Carolina.

    https://libguides.gwu.edu/research

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 8 FLECT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 8 FLECT.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Primary Government Source

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Primary Government Source.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Reflection 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx – ## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx **## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx** **Journal #2 Topic**: **Considering your work in field 1 and now in field 2, name at least 1 human behavior theory that has guided your work. Explain the importance of that…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx

    – ## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx

    **## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx**

    **Journal #2 Topic**:
    **Considering your work in field 1 and now in field 2, name at least 1 human behavior theory that has guided your work. Explain the importance of that theory to your successful practice.You may also include other reflections in your journal but please ensure to speak about the topic for the journal as well.**

    Be sure to utilize all headings, including paragraph headings, in your journal.  Paragraph Headings:  What, So What, Now What, Summary.

    · What: State facts and observations of the event/situation. (objective)

    · So What: Students to present personal thoughts, reflections, and/or feelings about the event/situation. May also include a discussion about how your perspective has changed. (subjective)

    · Now What:  Based on educational knowledge already possessed or learned, how does that knowledge affect your future behavior or action in connection with the event/situation?  Clearly connect knowledge with social work practice. (see explanation below)

    · Summary: Brief overview of the journal. Each heading discussion should be about the same event/situation.

    **Focus** (discussion of Journal) may be any Topic of the Week on the Syllabus OR any experience or observation that you had during your internship at the agency.

    **_How to Connect knowledge to practice in your journal??_** Discuss knowledge that you learned or know through your education and how you applied that to your practice in field placement.  Why are you doing what you are doing as a social worker?

    Journals should be no more than 1.5 pages in length, double-spaced, and in APA 7th edition format.

    The agency is Center to Rise – Here’s the website:
    [https://centertorise.com/](https://centertorise.com/)

    This is the same agency where I completed my placement during Term 1 last semester. While the assignments for last semester and the current semester (Placement Term 2) share the same structure and requirements, the content must be original and not identical. However, it can reflect similar themes or experiences, given that it is the same agency.

    Reflection 2 journal during the last term had a complete different question, so I didn’t attach the previous assignment here.

    However as sample, I’ve attached the reflection journal 1 that you completed on this 2nd term.

    **## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx**

    2

    **Journal Reflection**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Professor’s Name

    Course Name

    Due Date

    **What**

    In my second-term internship at Center To Rise, I learned how ethics and professionalism guide the agency. Therapists met regularly to examine ongoing cases while protecting client privacy. Only required client information was shared for professional advancement, anonymized. This practice demonstrated ethical behavior, particularly regarding client privacy and team information sharing. In a session I saw this semester, the therapist sought to rebuild informed consent with a returning client with changed treatment goals. This increased the agency's client autonomy and openness ethics. Professionally, the therapist described availability and field of practice without sacrificing empathy or warmth. Here, the Center to Rise demonstrated its integrity and therapist-client professionalism.

    **So What**

    This encounter reinforced the necessity of ethical reasoning in clinical and therapeutic social work. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Now What**

    My study on the NASW Code of Ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks has prepared me to tackle ethical problems with purpose and clarity. I now realize that professional social workers must continually think, be self-aware, and consult when ethically unsure. My future fieldwork will include more systematic ethical thinking. I will evaluate my ethical behavior following client or team meetings, such as autonomy, fairness, and honesty. Self-care is also part of professionalism, especially in emotionally difficult instances. I now know that professionalism requires regulating my answers and being present and productive for my customers.

    I will continue to work ethically by respecting confidentiality, professional boundaries, and client rights. I also want to improve my professionalism by communicating better, being prompt and documenting well, and seeking supervision to address ethical issues. These behaviors reflect my social work beliefs and Center To Rise's comprehensive, client-centered philosophy. This event reinforced the need to apply ethics to all social work practice, particularly clinical and therapeutic contexts. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Summary**

    My experience at Center To Rise has improved my regard for therapeutic ethics and expertise. Observing client sessions, case reviews, and staff interactions has shown me how these concepts build trust and effectiveness. Ethics like confidentiality, informed consent, and client autonomy are essential to good therapeutic partnerships, and the agency upholds them (Johnson et al., 2021). As I complete my field placement, I will internalize and demonstrate these ethical and professional standards in all aspects of my social work practice.

    **References**

    Johnson, M. K., Weeks, S. N., Peacock, G. G., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2021). Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues.
    _Ethics & Behavior_,
    _32_(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.1913593

    **## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx**

    2

    **Journal Reflection**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Professor’s Name

    Course Name

    Due Date

    **What**

    In my second-term internship at Center To Rise, I learned how ethics and professionalism guide the agency. Therapists met regularly to examine ongoing cases while protecting client privacy. Only required client information was shared for professional advancement, anonymized. This practice demonstrated ethical behavior, particularly regarding client privacy and team information sharing. In a session I saw this semester, the therapist sought to rebuild informed consent with a returning client with changed treatment goals. This increased the agency's client autonomy and openness ethics. Professionally, the therapist described availability and field of practice without sacrificing empathy or warmth. Here, the Center to Rise demonstrated its integrity and therapist-client professionalism.

    **So What**

    This encounter reinforced the necessity of ethical reasoning in clinical and therapeutic social work. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Now What**

    My study on the NASW Code of Ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks has prepared me to tackle ethical problems with purpose and clarity. I now realize that professional social workers must continually think, be self-aware, and consult when ethically unsure. My future fieldwork will include more systematic ethical thinking. I will evaluate my ethical behavior following client or team meetings, such as autonomy, fairness, and honesty. Self-care is also part of professionalism, especially in emotionally difficult instances. I now know that professionalism requires regulating my answers and being present and productive for my customers.

    I will continue to work ethically by respecting confidentiality, professional boundaries, and client rights. I also want to improve my professionalism by communicating better, being prompt and documenting well, and seeking supervision to address ethical issues. These behaviors reflect my social work beliefs and Center To Rise's comprehensive, client-centered philosophy. This event reinforced the need to apply ethics to all social work practice, particularly clinical and therapeutic contexts. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Summary**

    My experience at Center To Rise has improved my regard for therapeutic ethics and expertise. Observing client sessions, case reviews, and staff interactions has shown me how these concepts build trust and effectiveness. Ethics like confidentiality, informed consent, and client autonomy are essential to good therapeutic partnerships, and the agency upholds them (Johnson et al., 2021). As I complete my field placement, I will internalize and demonstrate these ethical and professional standards in all aspects of my social work practice.

    **References**

    Johnson, M. K., Weeks, S. N., Peacock, G. G., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2021). Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues.
    _Ethics & Behavior_,
    _32_(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.1913593

    **## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx**

    **Journal #2 Topic**:
    **Considering your work in field 1 and now in field 2, name at least 1 human behavior theory that has guided your work. Explain the importance of that theory to your successful practice.You may also include other reflections in your journal but please ensure to speak about the topic for the journal as well.**

    Be sure to utilize all headings, including paragraph headings, in your journal.  Paragraph Headings:  What, So What, Now What, Summary.

    · What: State facts and observations of the event/situation. (objective)

    · So What: Students to present personal thoughts, reflections, and/or feelings about the event/situation. May also include a discussion about how your perspective has changed. (subjective)

    · Now What:  Based on educational knowledge already possessed or learned, how does that knowledge affect your future behavior or action in connection with the event/situation?  Clearly connect knowledge with social work practice. (see explanation below)

    · Summary: Brief overview of the journal. Each heading discussion should be about the same event/situation.

    **Focus** (discussion of Journal) may be any Topic of the Week on the Syllabus OR any experience or observation that you had during your internship at the agency.

    **_How to Connect knowledge to practice in your journal??_** Discuss knowledge that you learned or know through your education and how you applied that to your practice in field placement.  Why are you doing what you are doing as a social worker?

    Journals should be no more than 1.5 pages in length, double-spaced, and in APA 7th edition format.

    The agency is Center to Rise – Here’s the website:
    [https://centertorise.com/](https://centertorise.com/)

    This is the same agency where I completed my placement during Term 1 last semester. While the assignments for last semester and the current semester (Placement Term 2) share the same structure and requirements, the content must be original and not identical. However, it can reflect similar themes or experiences, given that it is the same agency.

    Reflection 2 journal during the last term had a complete different question, so I didn’t attach the previous assignment here.

    However as sample, I’ve attached the reflection journal 1 that you completed on this 2nd term.

    **## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx**

    2

    **Journal Reflection**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Professor’s Name

    Course Name

    Due Date

    **What**

    In my second-term internship at Center To Rise, I learned how ethics and professionalism guide the agency. Therapists met regularly to examine ongoing cases while protecting client privacy. Only required client information was shared for professional advancement, anonymized. This practice demonstrated ethical behavior, particularly regarding client privacy and team information sharing. In a session I saw this semester, the therapist sought to rebuild informed consent with a returning client with changed treatment goals. This increased the agency's client autonomy and openness ethics. Professionally, the therapist described availability and field of practice without sacrificing empathy or warmth. Here, the Center to Rise demonstrated its integrity and therapist-client professionalism.

    **So What**

    This encounter reinforced the necessity of ethical reasoning in clinical and therapeutic social work. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Now What**

    My study on the NASW Code of Ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks has prepared me to tackle ethical problems with purpose and clarity. I now realize that professional social workers must continually think, be self-aware, and consult when ethically unsure. My future fieldwork will include more systematic ethical thinking. I will evaluate my ethical behavior following client or team meetings, such as autonomy, fairness, and honesty. Self-care is also part of professionalism, especially in emotionally difficult instances. I now know that professionalism requires regulating my answers and being present and productive for my customers.

    I will continue to work ethically by respecting confidentiality, professional boundaries, and client rights. I also want to improve my professionalism by communicating better, being prompt and documenting well, and seeking supervision to address ethical issues. These behaviors reflect my social work beliefs and Center To Rise's comprehensive, client-centered philosophy. This event reinforced the need to apply ethics to all social work practice, particularly clinical and therapeutic contexts. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Summary**

    My experience at Center To Rise has improved my regard for therapeutic ethics and expertise. Observing client sessions, case reviews, and staff interactions has shown me how these concepts build trust and effectiveness. Ethics like confidentiality, informed consent, and client autonomy are essential to good therapeutic partnerships, and the agency upholds them (Johnson et al., 2021). As I complete my field placement, I will internalize and demonstrate these ethical and professional standards in all aspects of my social work practice.

    **References**

    Johnson, M. K., Weeks, S. N., Peacock, G. G., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2021). Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues.
    _Ethics & Behavior_,
    _32_(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.1913593

    **## ReflectionJournal2instructions.docx**

    **Journal #2 Topic**:
    **Considering your work in field 1 and now in field 2, name at least 1 human behavior theory that has guided your work. Explain the importance of that theory to your successful practice.You may also include other reflections in your journal but please ensure to speak about the topic for the journal as well.**

    Be sure to utilize all headings, including paragraph headings, in your journal.  Paragraph Headings:  What, So What, Now What, Summary.

    · What: State facts and observations of the event/situation. (objective)

    · So What: Students to present personal thoughts, reflections, and/or feelings about the event/situation. May also include a discussion about how your perspective has changed. (subjective)

    · Now What:  Based on educational knowledge already possessed or learned, how does that knowledge affect your future behavior or action in connection with the event/situation?  Clearly connect knowledge with social work practice. (see explanation below)

    · Summary: Brief overview of the journal. Each heading discussion should be about the same event/situation.

    **Focus** (discussion of Journal) may be any Topic of the Week on the Syllabus OR any experience or observation that you had during your internship at the agency.

    **_How to Connect knowledge to practice in your journal??_** Discuss knowledge that you learned or know through your education and how you applied that to your practice in field placement.  Why are you doing what you are doing as a social worker?

    Journals should be no more than 1.5 pages in length, double-spaced, and in APA 7th edition format.

    The agency is Center to Rise – Here’s the website:
    [https://centertorise.com/](https://centertorise.com/)

    This is the same agency where I completed my placement during Term 1 last semester. While the assignments for last semester and the current semester (Placement Term 2) share the same structure and requirements, the content must be original and not identical. However, it can reflect similar themes or experiences, given that it is the same agency.

    Reflection 2 journal during the last term had a complete different question, so I didn’t attach the previous assignment here.

    However as sample, I’ve attached the reflection journal 1 that you completed on this 2nd term.

    **## Sample-ReflectionJournal1Thisterm.docx**

    2

    **Journal Reflection**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Professor’s Name

    Course Name

    Due Date

    **What**

    In my second-term internship at Center To Rise, I learned how ethics and professionalism guide the agency. Therapists met regularly to examine ongoing cases while protecting client privacy. Only required client information was shared for professional advancement, anonymized. This practice demonstrated ethical behavior, particularly regarding client privacy and team information sharing. In a session I saw this semester, the therapist sought to rebuild informed consent with a returning client with changed treatment goals. This increased the agency's client autonomy and openness ethics. Professionally, the therapist described availability and field of practice without sacrificing empathy or warmth. Here, the Center to Rise demonstrated its integrity and therapist-client professionalism.

    **So What**

    This encounter reinforced the necessity of ethical reasoning in clinical and therapeutic social work. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Now What**

    My study on the NASW Code of Ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks has prepared me to tackle ethical problems with purpose and clarity. I now realize that professional social workers must continually think, be self-aware, and consult when ethically unsure. My future fieldwork will include more systematic ethical thinking. I will evaluate my ethical behavior following client or team meetings, such as autonomy, fairness, and honesty. Self-care is also part of professionalism, especially in emotionally difficult instances. I now know that professionalism requires regulating my answers and being present and productive for my customers.

    I will continue to work ethically by respecting confidentiality, professional boundaries, and client rights. I also want to improve my professionalism by communicating better, being prompt and documenting well, and seeking supervision to address ethical issues. These behaviors reflect my social work beliefs and Center To Rise's comprehensive, client-centered philosophy. This event reinforced the need to apply ethics to all social work practice, particularly clinical and therapeutic contexts. I related to the therapist's informed consent and limits while creating my professional identity. It reminded me that ethics is a lifestyle that affects client trust and safety, not just a list of regulations. I was struck by how the therapist handled sensitive themes with respect and confidence, proving that professionalism involves knowledge, attitude, and approach. I now see ethics and professionalism more nuancedly than in my first semester. I notice how they are used in subtle but major ways in client encounters, documentation, inter-professional communication, and self-regulation. I now see that ethical difficulties regularly occur in daily actions like managing dual relationships, setting boundaries, and reporting suspected abuse.

    **Summary**

    My experience at Center To Rise has improved my regard for therapeutic ethics and expertise. Observing client sessions, case reviews, and staff interactions has shown me how these concepts build trust and effectiveness. Ethics like confidentiality, informed consent, and client autonomy are essential to good therapeutic partnerships, and the agency upholds them (Johnson et al., 2021). As I complete my field placement, I will internalize and demonstrate these ethical and professional standards in all aspects of my social work practice.

    **References**

    Johnson, M. K., Weeks, S. N., Peacock, G. G., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2021). Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues.
    _Ethics & Behavior_,
    _32_(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.1913593

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Case 4- 80

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help – ## Case480.docx **## Case480.docx** **Module 4 – Case** **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy** **Assignment Overview** Information Technology strategy development and implementation will take practice, but this is a journey. A firm’s IT strategy will evolve over time and im…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help

    – ## Case480.docx

    **## Case480.docx**

    **Module 4 – Case**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Assignment Overview**

    Information Technology strategy development and implementation will take practice, but this is a journey. A firm’s IT strategy will evolve over time and improve over time. The CIO must draw from diverse sources to develop new ideas, tactics, and projects. Diverse sources include employees of different racial and ethnic backgrounds and diversity in gender. These workers bring a fresh perspective in determining systems requirements and can result in innovative solutions.

    Begin with business practice articles such as those in the Wall Street Journal, which covers business generally, but also has a good section for technology executives and Chief Information Officers. Forbes often covers technology topics that you might find interesting. In terms of books on strategy, Michael Porter is a must. His original text is on competitive strategy, but he has a variety of other books to consider. Also look at this piece on creativity and diversity:
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/). You should follow leading thinkers in the world of technology, from venture capitalists and technology executives to those who write primarily for a CIO audience.

    **Case Assignment**

    Prepare a 4- to 5-page paper for the following:

    Look at the business–IT alignment at Amazon. Compare the business–IT alignment of the Amazon business line that sells products to customers with the Amazon business that sells IT cloud services to organizations. Look for articles in Forbes and Business Week that discuss the organization and strategy of Amazon and specifically address the issue of alignment. Discuss the synergy across these lines of business for Amazon and the diversity that Amazon uses in its hiring practices to enable innovation across the business units. Provide specifics in your discussion to enable a comparative analysis, including any experience you may have had with Amazon.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be evaluated based on the Rubric.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Required Reading**

    CISM 2020: Information Security & Business Process Alignment, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Blum, D. (2021).  Rational cybersecurity for business: The security leaders' guide to business alignment. Apress. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Johnson, A. (2021).  The art of alignment: A data-driven approach to lead aligned organizations. Made for Success. Chapters 1 -5. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    **## Case480.docx**

    **Module 4 – Case**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Assignment Overview**

    Information Technology strategy development and implementation will take practice, but this is a journey. A firm’s IT strategy will evolve over time and improve over time. The CIO must draw from diverse sources to develop new ideas, tactics, and projects. Diverse sources include employees of different racial and ethnic backgrounds and diversity in gender. These workers bring a fresh perspective in determining systems requirements and can result in innovative solutions.

    Begin with business practice articles such as those in the Wall Street Journal, which covers business generally, but also has a good section for technology executives and Chief Information Officers. Forbes often covers technology topics that you might find interesting. In terms of books on strategy, Michael Porter is a must. His original text is on competitive strategy, but he has a variety of other books to consider. Also look at this piece on creativity and diversity:
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/). You should follow leading thinkers in the world of technology, from venture capitalists and technology executives to those who write primarily for a CIO audience.

    **Case Assignment**

    Prepare a 4- to 5-page paper for the following:

    Look at the business–IT alignment at Amazon. Compare the business–IT alignment of the Amazon business line that sells products to customers with the Amazon business that sells IT cloud services to organizations. Look for articles in Forbes and Business Week that discuss the organization and strategy of Amazon and specifically address the issue of alignment. Discuss the synergy across these lines of business for Amazon and the diversity that Amazon uses in its hiring practices to enable innovation across the business units. Provide specifics in your discussion to enable a comparative analysis, including any experience you may have had with Amazon.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be evaluated based on the Rubric.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Required Reading**

    CISM 2020: Information Security & Business Process Alignment, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Blum, D. (2021).  Rational cybersecurity for business: The security leaders' guide to business alignment. Apress. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Johnson, A. (2021).  The art of alignment: A data-driven approach to lead aligned organizations. Made for Success. Chapters 1 -5. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

  • [Solved] SLP 4 – 80

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please help me – ## SLP480.docx **## SLP480.docx** **Module 4 – SLP** **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy** In a 2- to 3-page paper, identify at least five major computing trends that are already under way and are likely to continue. For each trend, pick a company and discuss how the tr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please help me

    – ## SLP480.docx

    **## SLP480.docx**

    **Module 4 – SLP**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    In a 2- to 3-page paper, identify at least five major computing trends that are already under way and are likely to continue. For each trend, pick a company and discuss how the trend could disrupt the company’s strategy.

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be graded according to the
    **MSITM SLP Grading Rubric**.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Required Reading**

    CISM 2020: Information Security & Business Process Alignment, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Blum, D. (2021).  Rational cybersecurity for business: The security leaders' guide to business alignment. Apress. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Johnson, A. (2021).  The art of alignment: A data-driven approach to lead aligned organizations. Made for Success. Chapters 1 -5. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    **## SLP480.docx**

    **Module 4 – SLP**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    In a 2- to 3-page paper, identify at least five major computing trends that are already under way and are likely to continue. For each trend, pick a company and discuss how the trend could disrupt the company’s strategy.

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be graded according to the
    **MSITM SLP Grading Rubric**.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Alignment of IT Strategy and Business Strategy**

    **Required Reading**

    CISM 2020: Information Security & Business Process Alignment, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Blum, D. (2021).  Rational cybersecurity for business: The security leaders' guide to business alignment. Apress. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Johnson, A. (2021).  The art of alignment: A data-driven approach to lead aligned organizations. Made for Success. Chapters 1 -5. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.