Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 17494224081306862864504755908081.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17494224081306862864504755908081-jpg "17494224081306862864504755908081.jpg") \ 1749422427529428394185055976691.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/1749422427529428394185055976691-jpg "1749422427529428394185055976691.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    17494224081306862864504755908081.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17494224081306862864504755908081-jpg "17494224081306862864504755908081.jpg")
    \
    1749422427529428394185055976691.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/1749422427529428394185055976691-jpg "1749422427529428394185055976691.jpg")

  • [Solved] Comp FInal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached doc for details APA format and Turnitin report.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached doc for details
    APA format and Turnitin report.

  • [Solved] Law – Criminal Week 10 Assignment – Contingency Plan NO PLAGARISM

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    KION Group is a global material handling Equipment Company based in Germany. Forklift trucks and warehouse automation equipment are the company's main products. KION Group needs to prepare for the prevailing computer incidents of today and tomorrow. An organization can assist in developing a compute…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    KION Group is a global material handling Equipment Company based in Germany. Forklift trucks and warehouse automation equipment are the company's main products. KION Group needs to prepare for the prevailing computer incidents of today and tomorrow. An organization can assist in developing a computer incident response team (CIRT) plan for a number of computer-based safety incidents.
    This assignment will discuss a CIRT plan, which is often used as a contingency plan for the KION Group. A system administrator noticed yesterday that several of the file servers at HQ were responding very slowly. The KION Group headquarters (HQ) handles all incidents so that the plan will have its roots at HQ.
    Like the latest IBM Threat Intelligence Index, read a recent article to gather information on current threats and remember to leverage the BCP and DRP you generated for the organization last week.
    ## **Instructions**
    Write a 5 page paper in which you:
    1. Describe the purpose and primary elements of a CIRT plan.
    2. Discuss the relationship between a CIRT plan and risk management.
    3. Discuss the five Ws (who, what, where, when, and why) found in a CIRT plan in regard to the incident given in the above scenario.
    4. Explain how KION Group can leverage its BCP and DRP to develop and support its CIRT plan.
    5. Explain how you think threats will evolve to impact KION Group in the future and how the CIRT plan should be updated to combat them.
    6. Discuss at least five best practices to follow when creating a CIRT plan.
    7. Use at least two quality resources in this assignment. **Note:** Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources. The Strayer University Library is a good source for resources.

  • [Solved] CASE 3 – 80

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help please – ## Case380.docx **## Case380.docx** **Module 3 – Case** **Creating Value** **Assignment Overview** The Case Assignment for this module is about understanding the development of IT strategies that support and are supported by business strategy in a global economy. Given the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help please

    – ## Case380.docx

    **## Case380.docx**

    **Module 3 – Case**

    **Creating Value**

    **Assignment Overview**

    The Case Assignment for this module is about understanding the development of IT strategies that support and are supported by business strategy in a global economy. Given the large amount of investment in IT, companies need to receive high IT business value. To do that, a good IT strategy is essential especially when doing business in various parts of the world.

    Review the readings on the Background page about the digital economy.

    **Case Assignment**

    Using IT to compete on the world stage has become increasingly important in the global economy. Choose multiple industries and provide an example company for each industry in which IT plays a strategic role by adding value and providing a competitive advantage through innovative application of IT on the global stage and how these firms are meeting the concerns noted in the
    [_Global Information Technology Report 2021_](https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-technology-governance-report-2021).

    Please prepare a short (4- to 5-page) paper addressing the IT strategic roles for your selected firms.

    **Submit your paper upon completion.**

    Use information from the modular background readings as well as any good quality resource you can find. Please cite all sources and provide a reference list at the end of your paper.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    **Length:** Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be evaluated based on the Rubric.

    **Module 3 – Resources**

    **Creating Value**

    You have your strategy in place, and you have your prioritized list of projects to pursue. But, wait! What happens if one of the projects proves to be more expensive or less impactful than originally assessed? What happens if one of the strategic pillars is called into question—due to a change in the economy, for example? One of my favorite quotes about planning comes from the famed German military strategist, Helmuth von Moltke, who said, “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” You do not have enemies
    _per se_, but you do have a variety of realities that may logically require changes to either the strategy or to the project list. What then?

    Strategies should be created with the anticipation that they will need to be changed. There are events that may lead to change. And the simple passage of time should lead to changes as well. Examples of events include an economic downturn, but may also include the acquisition or divestiture of a business, a competitor beating you to the creation of a new product, a new market that is to be opened, and the like. Each of these, and other changes like them, should lead to a rethinking of the strategy. Mind you, none of these is likely to require canceling the entire strategy and starting anew, but it will be necessary to at least review the strategic plan to see if there’s anything that’s less relevant (or irrelevant) because of the event.

    This is likely to be at the tactic level, rather than the objective level, but the entire plan should be reviewed. The simple passage of time is another reason to review the plan. Many people falsely believe that if there is not an event then the plan should continue to be enacted. As time moves on, aspects of the plan will be accomplished that should be reflected as changes in the plan. Likewise, new strategic opportunities may present themselves. They may need to be incorporated into the plan. And in some cases, you may replace past tactics or objectives to do so. There’s also a tendency to think about the prioritized list of projects (that have been agreed to once the budget for IT is finalized) as set in stone. There are many reasons why a project might need to be canceled, even after it commences. Those might include a significant increase in the cost to develop the project, a reduction in potential value from implementing the project, or the vendor that was to partner with you on it goes out of business. These are three of many examples that would apply. Companies often fall for the sunk cost fallacy. They might say, we've already spent a million dollars on the project, we should see it through to its conclusion. But why throw good money after bad? Cutting your losses and redirecting funds to something of greater value is paramount. It’s also important to note that as projects arise outside of the budgeting cycle, they should be put through the same prioritization criteria, strategic fit, cost/benefit analysis, interdependency analysis, and risk analysis. Again, you may include another category or two of your own choosing.

    By using objective criteria to reprioritize, you can help avoid the situation that many CIOs and their teams find themselves in, where someone, especially when they are outside of IT, requests a project mid-year and suggests that it is their new top priority. What they often mean is, “Drop everything and work on this.” By having an objective set of criteria, you can at least speak about how the project ranks relative to projects that are in process, based on those criteria, and counterbalance this argument. Priorities and events will naturally lead to changes in your plan. But by having a sound process in place to ensure that you can handle these changes, you can be flexible enough to seize new opportunities as they arise.

    **Required Reading**

    Baumgartner, J. (2020).
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/).
    https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/

    Barthelemy, Jerome (2022). Myths of strategy: Dispel the misconceptions and deliver a winning strategy. Kogan Page. Chapter 5-10. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Datta, S., Roy, S., & Kutzewski, T. (2021).
    _Unlocking strategic innovation: Competitive success in a disruptive environment._ Taylor & Francis Group.

    Gamble, W. (2022). The cybersecurity maturity model certification (CMMC) – A pocket guide. IT Governance, audio book. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Developing an AI/ML Data Strategy: The Data Analytics Maturity Model, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    **## Case380.docx**

    **Module 3 – Case**

    **Creating Value**

    **Assignment Overview**

    The Case Assignment for this module is about understanding the development of IT strategies that support and are supported by business strategy in a global economy. Given the large amount of investment in IT, companies need to receive high IT business value. To do that, a good IT strategy is essential especially when doing business in various parts of the world.

    Review the readings on the Background page about the digital economy.

    **Case Assignment**

    Using IT to compete on the world stage has become increasingly important in the global economy. Choose multiple industries and provide an example company for each industry in which IT plays a strategic role by adding value and providing a competitive advantage through innovative application of IT on the global stage and how these firms are meeting the concerns noted in the
    [_Global Information Technology Report 2021_](https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-technology-governance-report-2021).

    Please prepare a short (4- to 5-page) paper addressing the IT strategic roles for your selected firms.

    **Submit your paper upon completion.**

    Use information from the modular background readings as well as any good quality resource you can find. Please cite all sources and provide a reference list at the end of your paper.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    **Length:** Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    Your assignment will be evaluated based on the Rubric.

    **Module 3 – Resources**

    **Creating Value**

    You have your strategy in place, and you have your prioritized list of projects to pursue. But, wait! What happens if one of the projects proves to be more expensive or less impactful than originally assessed? What happens if one of the strategic pillars is called into question—due to a change in the economy, for example? One of my favorite quotes about planning comes from the famed German military strategist, Helmuth von Moltke, who said, “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” You do not have enemies
    _per se_, but you do have a variety of realities that may logically require changes to either the strategy or to the project list. What then?

    Strategies should be created with the anticipation that they will need to be changed. There are events that may lead to change. And the simple passage of time should lead to changes as well. Examples of events include an economic downturn, but may also include the acquisition or divestiture of a business, a competitor beating you to the creation of a new product, a new market that is to be opened, and the like. Each of these, and other changes like them, should lead to a rethinking of the strategy. Mind you, none of these is likely to require canceling the entire strategy and starting anew, but it will be necessary to at least review the strategic plan to see if there’s anything that’s less relevant (or irrelevant) because of the event.

    This is likely to be at the tactic level, rather than the objective level, but the entire plan should be reviewed. The simple passage of time is another reason to review the plan. Many people falsely believe that if there is not an event then the plan should continue to be enacted. As time moves on, aspects of the plan will be accomplished that should be reflected as changes in the plan. Likewise, new strategic opportunities may present themselves. They may need to be incorporated into the plan. And in some cases, you may replace past tactics or objectives to do so. There’s also a tendency to think about the prioritized list of projects (that have been agreed to once the budget for IT is finalized) as set in stone. There are many reasons why a project might need to be canceled, even after it commences. Those might include a significant increase in the cost to develop the project, a reduction in potential value from implementing the project, or the vendor that was to partner with you on it goes out of business. These are three of many examples that would apply. Companies often fall for the sunk cost fallacy. They might say, we've already spent a million dollars on the project, we should see it through to its conclusion. But why throw good money after bad? Cutting your losses and redirecting funds to something of greater value is paramount. It’s also important to note that as projects arise outside of the budgeting cycle, they should be put through the same prioritization criteria, strategic fit, cost/benefit analysis, interdependency analysis, and risk analysis. Again, you may include another category or two of your own choosing.

    By using objective criteria to reprioritize, you can help avoid the situation that many CIOs and their teams find themselves in, where someone, especially when they are outside of IT, requests a project mid-year and suggests that it is their new top priority. What they often mean is, “Drop everything and work on this.” By having an objective set of criteria, you can at least speak about how the project ranks relative to projects that are in process, based on those criteria, and counterbalance this argument. Priorities and events will naturally lead to changes in your plan. But by having a sound process in place to ensure that you can handle these changes, you can be flexible enough to seize new opportunities as they arise.

    **Required Reading**

    Baumgartner, J. (2020).
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/).
    https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/

    Barthelemy, Jerome (2022). Myths of strategy: Dispel the misconceptions and deliver a winning strategy. Kogan Page. Chapter 5-10. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Datta, S., Roy, S., & Kutzewski, T. (2021).
    _Unlocking strategic innovation: Competitive success in a disruptive environment._ Taylor & Francis Group.

    Gamble, W. (2022). The cybersecurity maturity model certification (CMMC) – A pocket guide. IT Governance, audio book. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Developing an AI/ML Data Strategy: The Data Analytics Maturity Model, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

  • [Solved] Functional Areas

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    align your new knowledge of business functions (operations, marketing, IT, HR, and finance) with your chosen organization.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    align your new knowledge of business functions (operations, marketing, IT, HR, and finance) with your chosen organization.

  • [Solved] SLP 3 – 80

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please help me – ## SLP380.docx **## SLP380.docx** **Module 3 – SLP** **Creating Value** Read or listen to these resources on Dr. Michael Porter's competitive strategies. Porter, M. E. and Mauborgne, K. R., HBR's 10 must reads on strategy. Ascent Hu. Audio book. Go to Library Access. In Additional L…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please help me

    – ## SLP380.docx

    **## SLP380.docx**

    **Module 3 – SLP**

    **Creating Value**

    Read or listen to these resources on Dr. Michael Porter's competitive strategies.

    Porter, M. E. and Mauborgne, K. R., HBR's 10 must reads on strategy. Ascent Hu. Audio book.

    Go to Library Access. In Additional Library Resources, select Skillsoft Books. In the search box enter: HBR's 10 must reads on strategy, select the Books tab, then select: HBR's 10 must reads on strategy.

    Kamran, Qeis (2021). Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage. Kogan Page. Chapters 1 – 5

    Go to Library Access. In Additional Library Resources, select Skillsoft Books. In the search box enter: Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage, select the Books tab, then select: Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage.

    Research a firm that interests you and on which you can obtain sufficient information; find information through sources such as Forbes.com and Businessweek.com, etc., or journal publications.

    In this assignment, you are to apply Porter’s value chain model to the firm you selected. Your paper should cover the following:

    1. Discuss what competitive forces entail, the competitive environment of your firm, and the strategy (strategies) that it undertakes.

    2. Explain what value chain means and use it to analyze the company of your choice. Describe the tasks that the firm must accomplish for each primary value chain activity.

    3. Given the nature of its business, how would the firm’s information systems contribute to its competitive strategy,

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    1. The paper has proper introduction, discussion, and summary.

    2. The report should address all questions, but they do not need to be in the order the questions are raised. The key is to have a paper that flows well.

    3. References used need to be listed according to the APA7 format.

    **Module 3 – Resources**

    **Creating Value**

    You have your strategy in place, and you have your prioritized list of projects to pursue. But, wait! What happens if one of the projects proves to be more expensive or less impactful than originally assessed? What happens if one of the strategic pillars is called into question—due to a change in the economy, for example? One of my favorite quotes about planning comes from the famed German military strategist, Helmuth von Moltke, who said, “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” You do not have enemies
    _per se_, but you do have a variety of realities that may logically require changes to either the strategy or to the project list. What then?

    Strategies should be created with the anticipation that they will need to be changed. There are events that may lead to change. And the simple passage of time should lead to changes as well. Examples of events include an economic downturn, but may also include the acquisition or divestiture of a business, a competitor beating you to the creation of a new product, a new market that is to be opened, and the like. Each of these, and other changes like them, should lead to a rethinking of the strategy. Mind you, none of these is likely to require canceling the entire strategy and starting anew, but it will be necessary to at least review the strategic plan to see if there’s anything that’s less relevant (or irrelevant) because of the event.

    This is likely to be at the tactic level, rather than the objective level, but the entire plan should be reviewed. The simple passage of time is another reason to review the plan. Many people falsely believe that if there is not an event then the plan should continue to be enacted. As time moves on, aspects of the plan will be accomplished that should be reflected as changes in the plan. Likewise, new strategic opportunities may present themselves. They may need to be incorporated into the plan. And in some cases, you may replace past tactics or objectives to do so. There’s also a tendency to think about the prioritized list of projects (that have been agreed to once the budget for IT is finalized) as set in stone. There are many reasons why a project might need to be canceled, even after it commences. Those might include a significant increase in the cost to develop the project, a reduction in potential value from implementing the project, or the vendor that was to partner with you on it goes out of business. These are three of many examples that would apply. Companies often fall for the sunk cost fallacy. They might say, we've already spent a million dollars on the project, we should see it through to its conclusion. But why throw good money after bad? Cutting your losses and redirecting funds to something of greater value is paramount. It’s also important to note that as projects arise outside of the budgeting cycle, they should be put through the same prioritization criteria, strategic fit, cost/benefit analysis, interdependency analysis, and risk analysis. Again, you may include another category or two of your own choosing.

    By using objective criteria to reprioritize, you can help avoid the situation that many CIOs and their teams find themselves in, where someone, especially when they are outside of IT, requests a project mid-year and suggests that it is their new top priority. What they often mean is, “Drop everything and work on this.” By having an objective set of criteria, you can at least speak about how the project ranks relative to projects that are in process, based on those criteria, and counterbalance this argument. Priorities and events will naturally lead to changes in your plan. But by having a sound process in place to ensure that you can handle these changes, you can be flexible enough to seize new opportunities as they arise.

    **Required Reading**

    Baumgartner, J. (2020).
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/).
    https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/

    Barthelemy, Jerome (2022). Myths of strategy: Dispel the misconceptions and deliver a winning strategy. Kogan Page. Chapter 5-10. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Datta, S., Roy, S., & Kutzewski, T. (2021).
    _Unlocking strategic innovation: Competitive success in a disruptive environment._ Taylor & Francis Group.

    Gamble, W. (2022). The cybersecurity maturity model certification (CMMC) – A pocket guide. IT Governance, audio book. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Developing an AI/ML Data Strategy: The Data Analytics Maturity Model, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    **## SLP380.docx**

    **Module 3 – SLP**

    **Creating Value**

    Read or listen to these resources on Dr. Michael Porter's competitive strategies.

    Porter, M. E. and Mauborgne, K. R., HBR's 10 must reads on strategy. Ascent Hu. Audio book.

    Go to Library Access. In Additional Library Resources, select Skillsoft Books. In the search box enter: HBR's 10 must reads on strategy, select the Books tab, then select: HBR's 10 must reads on strategy.

    Kamran, Qeis (2021). Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage. Kogan Page. Chapters 1 – 5

    Go to Library Access. In Additional Library Resources, select Skillsoft Books. In the search box enter: Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage, select the Books tab, then select: Strategic value chain management: Models for competitive advantage.

    Research a firm that interests you and on which you can obtain sufficient information; find information through sources such as Forbes.com and Businessweek.com, etc., or journal publications.

    In this assignment, you are to apply Porter’s value chain model to the firm you selected. Your paper should cover the following:

    1. Discuss what competitive forces entail, the competitive environment of your firm, and the strategy (strategies) that it undertakes.

    2. Explain what value chain means and use it to analyze the company of your choice. Describe the tasks that the firm must accomplish for each primary value chain activity.

    3. Given the nature of its business, how would the firm’s information systems contribute to its competitive strategy,

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    1. The paper has proper introduction, discussion, and summary.

    2. The report should address all questions, but they do not need to be in the order the questions are raised. The key is to have a paper that flows well.

    3. References used need to be listed according to the APA7 format.

    **Module 3 – Resources**

    **Creating Value**

    You have your strategy in place, and you have your prioritized list of projects to pursue. But, wait! What happens if one of the projects proves to be more expensive or less impactful than originally assessed? What happens if one of the strategic pillars is called into question—due to a change in the economy, for example? One of my favorite quotes about planning comes from the famed German military strategist, Helmuth von Moltke, who said, “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” You do not have enemies
    _per se_, but you do have a variety of realities that may logically require changes to either the strategy or to the project list. What then?

    Strategies should be created with the anticipation that they will need to be changed. There are events that may lead to change. And the simple passage of time should lead to changes as well. Examples of events include an economic downturn, but may also include the acquisition or divestiture of a business, a competitor beating you to the creation of a new product, a new market that is to be opened, and the like. Each of these, and other changes like them, should lead to a rethinking of the strategy. Mind you, none of these is likely to require canceling the entire strategy and starting anew, but it will be necessary to at least review the strategic plan to see if there’s anything that’s less relevant (or irrelevant) because of the event.

    This is likely to be at the tactic level, rather than the objective level, but the entire plan should be reviewed. The simple passage of time is another reason to review the plan. Many people falsely believe that if there is not an event then the plan should continue to be enacted. As time moves on, aspects of the plan will be accomplished that should be reflected as changes in the plan. Likewise, new strategic opportunities may present themselves. They may need to be incorporated into the plan. And in some cases, you may replace past tactics or objectives to do so. There’s also a tendency to think about the prioritized list of projects (that have been agreed to once the budget for IT is finalized) as set in stone. There are many reasons why a project might need to be canceled, even after it commences. Those might include a significant increase in the cost to develop the project, a reduction in potential value from implementing the project, or the vendor that was to partner with you on it goes out of business. These are three of many examples that would apply. Companies often fall for the sunk cost fallacy. They might say, we've already spent a million dollars on the project, we should see it through to its conclusion. But why throw good money after bad? Cutting your losses and redirecting funds to something of greater value is paramount. It’s also important to note that as projects arise outside of the budgeting cycle, they should be put through the same prioritization criteria, strategic fit, cost/benefit analysis, interdependency analysis, and risk analysis. Again, you may include another category or two of your own choosing.

    By using objective criteria to reprioritize, you can help avoid the situation that many CIOs and their teams find themselves in, where someone, especially when they are outside of IT, requests a project mid-year and suggests that it is their new top priority. What they often mean is, “Drop everything and work on this.” By having an objective set of criteria, you can at least speak about how the project ranks relative to projects that are in process, based on those criteria, and counterbalance this argument. Priorities and events will naturally lead to changes in your plan. But by having a sound process in place to ensure that you can handle these changes, you can be flexible enough to seize new opportunities as they arise.

    **Required Reading**

    Baumgartner, J. (2020).
    [_Why diversity is the mother of creativity_](https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/).
    https://innovationmanagement.se/2010/11/24/why-diversity-is-the-mother-of-creativity/

    Barthelemy, Jerome (2022). Myths of strategy: Dispel the misconceptions and deliver a winning strategy. Kogan Page. Chapter 5-10. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Datta, S., Roy, S., & Kutzewski, T. (2021).
    _Unlocking strategic innovation: Competitive success in a disruptive environment._ Taylor & Francis Group.

    Gamble, W. (2022). The cybersecurity maturity model certification (CMMC) – A pocket guide. IT Governance, audio book. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

    Developing an AI/ML Data Strategy: The Data Analytics Maturity Model, Course. Available in the Trident Online Library in Skillsoft.

  • [Solved] Research Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Research Proposal **Instructions** The components of this assignment include a research question, a purpose statement, and six sources (at least four of which must be peer-reviewed). The specific research question should relate to a general topic in the course. I will review and grade your research …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Research Proposal
    **Instructions**
    The components of this assignment include a research question, a purpose statement, and six sources (at least four of which must be peer-reviewed). The specific research question should relate to a general topic in the course. I will review and grade your research question and either approve the topic or have you resubmit it with revisions.
    **Technical Requirements**
    **Topic:** Cyber Crime, Espionage and Terrorism
    – Your paper should be 1-2 pages double spaced (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
    – Scholarly and credible references should be used. At least 6 sources are required and at least 4 of those sources must be peer-reviewed).
    – Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
    – Students will follow the current Turabian Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
    – Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
    – All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

  • [Solved] I&T W5 REPLIES

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering I&T W5 REPLIES.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] FOCUSED NOTE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## EpisodicVisitPEDS1.docx **## EpisodicVisitPEDS1.docx** Episodic Visit: Adolescent Focused Note (Ages 13-17) **SENARIO- SICK VISIT-PATIENT SORE THROAT.** Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learnin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## EpisodicVisitPEDS1.docx

    **## EpisodicVisitPEDS1.docx**

    Episodic Visit: Adolescent Focused Note (Ages 13-17)

    **SENARIO- SICK VISIT-PATIENT SORE THROAT.**

    Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Focused Notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.

    For this Assignment, you will work with an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks and complete a Focused Note Template in which you will gather patient information, relevant diagnostic and treatment information, and reflect on health promotion and disease prevention in light of patient factors, such as age, ethnic group, past medical history (PMH), socio-economic status, cultural background, etc. In this week’s Learning Resources, please refer to the Focused Note resources for guidance on writing Focused Notes.

    **Note**: All Focused Notes must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your preceptor. When you submit your Focused Notes, you should include the complete Focused Note as a Word document and pdf/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your preceptor. You must submit your Focused Notes using Turnitin.

    **Note**: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936684)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the Focused Note Checklist provided in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how you will develop your Focused Note for this week’s Assignment.

    · Use the Focused SOAP Note Template and the example found in the Learning Resources for this week to complete this Assignment.

    · Select an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a Focused Note.

    **Assignment**

    · Subjective: What details did the patient or parent provide regarding the personal and medical history? Include any discrepancies between the details provided by the child and details provided by the parent as well as possible reasons for these discrepancies.

    · Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Include pertinent positive and negative physical exam findings. Describe whether the patient presented with any growth and development or psychosocial issues.

    · Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority and include their ICD-10 code for the diagnosis. What was your primary diagnosis and why?

    · Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management? Include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

    · Reflection notes: What was your “aha” moment? What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

    **Note**: Your Focused Note Assignment must be signed by Day 7 of Week 3.

    **SICK VISIT-PATIENT SORE THROAT**.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Write-up | **10 to >6.0 ptsExcellent** All information organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings.<br> <br>**6 to >3.0 ptsGood** Information generally organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsFair** Errors in format; information intermittently organized. Headings are used some of the time.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Errors in format; information disorganized. Headings are not used appropriately. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of History | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all pertinent history components for type of note; includes critical as well as supportive information.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsGood** Documents most pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsFair** Documents some pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**7 to >0 ptsPoor** Physical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of Present Illness | **10 to >6.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all 8 aspects of HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical as well as supportive information.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsGood** Documents at least 6 aspects of the HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical information.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Documents at least 4 aspects of HPI and some data pertinent to chief complaint. Lacks some critical information or rambling in history.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Missing many aspects of HPI and pertinent data. Critical information missing. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of Physical Exam | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Documents most pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Documents some pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Physical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostic Reasoning | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes all secondary problems. Cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes most secondary problems.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Assessment mostly consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Assessment not consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTreatment Plan/Patient Education | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Treatment plan addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Medications prescribed are appropriate and full prescription is included. Evidence based decisions. Cost effective treatment.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsGood** Treatment plan addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications prescribed are appropriate but include 1 or 2 error in writing prescription.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Treatment plan fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications are inappropriate or include 3 or more errors in writing prescription.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Minimal treatment plan addressed. Medications are inappropriate or poorly written prescription. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Education / Follow Up / Reflection | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Patient education addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Follow up plan in appropriate and reflects acuity of illness. Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.<br> <br>**8 to >5.0 ptsGood** Patient education addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is appropriate but lacks specifics Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Patient education fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is lacking specifics or is inappropriate for patient acuity. Reflection is brief, vague. and does not discuss anything that would have been done in addition to or differently.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Minimal patient education addressed. Follow up plan is inappropriate Reflection is absent. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Professional language utilized | **5 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Professional language utilized.<br> <br>**4 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains a few errors (1 or 2) in professional language use.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains several errors (3 -4) in professional language use.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains many errors in professional language use. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly References and Clinical Practice Guidelines. The assignment includes a minimum of 3 scholarly references that are not older than 5 years. Clinical practice guidelines are included if applicable. | **5 ptsExcellent** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable.<br> <br>**4 ptsGood** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference less than 5 years old is listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936663)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936679)

    **## EpisodicVisitPEDS1.docx**

    Episodic Visit: Adolescent Focused Note (Ages 13-17)

    **SENARIO- SICK VISIT-PATIENT SORE THROAT.**

    Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Focused Notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.

    For this Assignment, you will work with an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks and complete a Focused Note Template in which you will gather patient information, relevant diagnostic and treatment information, and reflect on health promotion and disease prevention in light of patient factors, such as age, ethnic group, past medical history (PMH), socio-economic status, cultural background, etc. In this week’s Learning Resources, please refer to the Focused Note resources for guidance on writing Focused Notes.

    **Note**: All Focused Notes must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your preceptor. When you submit your Focused Notes, you should include the complete Focused Note as a Word document and pdf/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your preceptor. You must submit your Focused Notes using Turnitin.

    **Note**: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936684)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the Focused Note Checklist provided in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how you will develop your Focused Note for this week’s Assignment.

    · Use the Focused SOAP Note Template and the example found in the Learning Resources for this week to complete this Assignment.

    · Select an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a Focused Note.

    **Assignment**

    · Subjective: What details did the patient or parent provide regarding the personal and medical history? Include any discrepancies between the details provided by the child and details provided by the parent as well as possible reasons for these discrepancies.

    · Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Include pertinent positive and negative physical exam findings. Describe whether the patient presented with any growth and development or psychosocial issues.

    · Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority and include their ICD-10 code for the diagnosis. What was your primary diagnosis and why?

    · Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management? Include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

    · Reflection notes: What was your “aha” moment? What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

    **Note**: Your Focused Note Assignment must be signed by Day 7 of Week 3.

    **SICK VISIT-PATIENT SORE THROAT**.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Write-up | **10 to >6.0 ptsExcellent** All information organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings.<br> <br>**6 to >3.0 ptsGood** Information generally organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsFair** Errors in format; information intermittently organized. Headings are used some of the time.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Errors in format; information disorganized. Headings are not used appropriately. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of History | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all pertinent history components for type of note; includes critical as well as supportive information.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsGood** Documents most pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsFair** Documents some pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**7 to >0 ptsPoor** Physical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of Present Illness | **10 to >6.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all 8 aspects of HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical as well as supportive information.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsGood** Documents at least 6 aspects of the HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical information.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Documents at least 4 aspects of HPI and some data pertinent to chief complaint. Lacks some critical information or rambling in history.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Missing many aspects of HPI and pertinent data. Critical information missing. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of Physical Exam | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Documents most pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Documents some pertinent examination components.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Physical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostic Reasoning | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes all secondary problems. Cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes most secondary problems.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** Assessment mostly consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Assessment not consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTreatment Plan/Patient Education | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Treatment plan addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Medications prescribed are appropriate and full prescription is included. Evidence based decisions. Cost effective treatment.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsGood** Treatment plan addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications prescribed are appropriate but include 1 or 2 error in writing prescription.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Treatment plan fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications are inappropriate or include 3 or more errors in writing prescription.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Minimal treatment plan addressed. Medications are inappropriate or poorly written prescription. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Education / Follow Up / Reflection | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Patient education addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Follow up plan in appropriate and reflects acuity of illness. Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.<br> <br>**8 to >5.0 ptsGood** Patient education addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is appropriate but lacks specifics Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Patient education fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is lacking specifics or is inappropriate for patient acuity. Reflection is brief, vague. and does not discuss anything that would have been done in addition to or differently.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Minimal patient education addressed. Follow up plan is inappropriate Reflection is absent. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Professional language utilized | **5 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Professional language utilized.<br> <br>**4 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains a few errors (1 or 2) in professional language use.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains several errors (3 -4) in professional language use.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains many errors in professional language use. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly References and Clinical Practice Guidelines. The assignment includes a minimum of 3 scholarly references that are not older than 5 years. Clinical practice guidelines are included if applicable. | **5 ptsExcellent** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable.<br> <br>**4 ptsGood** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference less than 5 years old is listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936663)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6936679)

  • [Solved] Can this be don in 4 hours? 8pages

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    COVER pg and Cite PG not included in 8pg.. 5 sources in the past 5 years!!! https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/citation/4597266730006731?auth=SAML NASW code ethics – **Standards and indicators for cultural competency in social work practice** WebsiteNASW, n.d.stick…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    COVER pg and Cite PG not included in 8pg.. 5 sources in the past 5 years!!!
    https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/citation/4597266730006731?auth=SAML
    NASW code ethics
    – **Standards and indicators for cultural competency in social work practice** WebsiteNASW, n.d.sticky_note_2 Note: Read pages 19–28.linkView online
    – Mark Best practice standards in social work supervision as done![Document: Best practice standards in social work supervision](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/nui/assets/images/item-types/svg/DO.svg) **Best practice standards in social work supervision** DocumentNASW, n.d.sticky_note_2 Note: Read pages 19–27.
    \
    Updated-Tech-Standards-2017.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/updated-tech-standards-2017-pdf "Updated-Tech-Standards-2017.pdf")
    \
    5017.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/5017-docx "5017.docx")