My Blog

Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] WK 11 DIS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## WK11DISC.docx **## WK11DISC.docx** The Value of Nursing Informatics and Project Management for Nursing Practice ![A doctor holding a stack of files AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis) Nursing informatics works to develop communication and info…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## WK11DISC.docx

    **## WK11DISC.docx**

    The Value of Nursing Informatics and Project Management for Nursing Practice

    ![A doctor holding a stack of files AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis)

    Nursing informatics works to develop communication and information technologies into clinical practice. However, this study is far more important to the discipline than just data analysis and connection. This discipline allows for growth in the industry using emerging technologies, data analysis, and changes in practice. Often, this occurs through the use of project management, to take a need, change, or issue, and identify a solution to implement in practice.

    Based on your experience with your nursing informatics project, the materials provided, and evidence collection, how might you explain the value of nursing informatics and project management in nursing practice? How does nursing informatics align with technology, and how is it far more than just data collection and analysis?

    For this Discussion, reflect on the implementation (or proposed implementation) of your nursing informatics project. Think about the value of the project management as it relates to nursing informatics and consider how nursing informatics impacts nursing practice and healthcare.

    To Prepare

    · Reflect on the last 10 weeks of the course, considering what you may have learned or experienced. Focus on the assigned learning materials, discussions, and projects.

    · Reflect on the concepts of nursing informatics, project management, and technology that you have examined throughout this course.

    · Consider how you might connect the topics and concepts that you have examined in this course to your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

    · Reflect on other areas of nursing informatics in which you may be interested.

    · Reflect on the value of designing a nursing informatics project, including the specific applications.

    · How might the concepts and competencies of project management assist you in the development of your DNP Project or dissertation?

    By Day 3 of Week 11

    **Post** a cohesive response that reflects on what you have examined in this course regarding the value of nursing informatics and how it may impact your clinical practice.

    How will you use what you have learned in this class in your professional practice and in your DNP project or dissertation? Identify two new informatics competencies that you have learned and discuss how you might use them to change your own practice.

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK11DISC.docx**

    The Value of Nursing Informatics and Project Management for Nursing Practice

    ![A doctor holding a stack of files AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis)

    Nursing informatics works to develop communication and information technologies into clinical practice. However, this study is far more important to the discipline than just data analysis and connection. This discipline allows for growth in the industry using emerging technologies, data analysis, and changes in practice. Often, this occurs through the use of project management, to take a need, change, or issue, and identify a solution to implement in practice.

    Based on your experience with your nursing informatics project, the materials provided, and evidence collection, how might you explain the value of nursing informatics and project management in nursing practice? How does nursing informatics align with technology, and how is it far more than just data collection and analysis?

    For this Discussion, reflect on the implementation (or proposed implementation) of your nursing informatics project. Think about the value of the project management as it relates to nursing informatics and consider how nursing informatics impacts nursing practice and healthcare.

    To Prepare

    · Reflect on the last 10 weeks of the course, considering what you may have learned or experienced. Focus on the assigned learning materials, discussions, and projects.

    · Reflect on the concepts of nursing informatics, project management, and technology that you have examined throughout this course.

    · Consider how you might connect the topics and concepts that you have examined in this course to your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

    · Reflect on other areas of nursing informatics in which you may be interested.

    · Reflect on the value of designing a nursing informatics project, including the specific applications.

    · How might the concepts and competencies of project management assist you in the development of your DNP Project or dissertation?

    By Day 3 of Week 11

    **Post** a cohesive response that reflects on what you have examined in this course regarding the value of nursing informatics and how it may impact your clinical practice.

    How will you use what you have learned in this class in your professional practice and in your DNP project or dissertation? Identify two new informatics competencies that you have learned and discuss how you might use them to change your own practice.

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Bivariate and Multivariate Regression

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx – classs_survey-11.sav **## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx** Using the class_survey dataset, you are going to address the following research questions: 1. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use? · State your null and research hypothesis. · …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx

    – classs_survey-11.sav

    **## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx**

    Using the class_survey dataset, you are going to address the following research questions:

    1. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Conduct regression analysis in SPSS to determine if scores on the BSSS Total (BSSSTotal) predict alcohol use (Alcohol). Write up the findings from the SPSS output in paragraph format. Report and interpret the r-squared value, unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variable/predictor = BSSSTotal

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    2. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, cigarette use, and callous-unemotional traits?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Based on prior research, we believe that age, gender, ethnicity (Latino vs. Non-Latino), cigarette use, and CU traits (ICUTotal) may also be important in predicting alcohol use. Conduct multiple regression in SPSS controlling for these variables to determine if the association between the BSSS total and alcohol use still holds.

    · Write up the findings from the SPSS output in a single paragraph (do not use bullet points). Your paragraph should include: (1) interpretation of the r-squared value, (2) which variables are and are not significant, (3) report unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients for significant variables only (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples), and (4) discuss the relative effects for any significant predictors (i.e., compare the effects using the standardized regression coefficients). Statistics should be reported in the proper format (see examples provided below).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variables/predictors = BSSSTotal, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Cigarettes, and ICUTotal.

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    Submit your hypotheses and write-ups – I do not need your spss output.

    Reporting regression:

    · Make sure to interpret the R Square value as the percent of the variance explained in the outcome by all variables included in the model and report the F-statistic when reporting significance.

    · Examples:

    · In a bivariate regression model, self-control predicted 23% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .23, F(2, 108) = 4.47, p = .04.

    · Age, gender, race, and self-control were included in the model predicting delinquency. Together the predictors explained 33% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .33, F(4, 108) = 5.67, p = .03.

    · When interpreting the unstandardized regression coefficients make sure to provide the proper interpretation:

    · Example: Self-control had a significant negative impact on delinquency (B = -.673, p = .002). Specifically, for every one unit increase on the self-control scale, there was a .673 decrease in self-reported delinquency.

    · Make sure to interpret the standardized regression coefficients in terms of standard deviation units and to report the standardized regression coefficients when discussing the relative magnitude of their effects on the outcome:

    · Example: Although both were significant predictors of delinquency, the effect of self-control (b = -.51, p = .002) was stronger than the effect for age (b = .23, p = .03). That is, for every one standard deviation increase in self-control there was a .51 standard deviation unit decrease in delinquency compared to only a .23 standard deviation increase associated with a one unit standard deviation increase for age.

    **classs_survey-11.sav**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classs-survey-11-sav-10364399)

    **classs_survey-11.sav**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classs-survey-11-sav-10364399)

    **## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx**

    Using the class_survey dataset, you are going to address the following research questions:

    1. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Conduct regression analysis in SPSS to determine if scores on the BSSS Total (BSSSTotal) predict alcohol use (Alcohol). Write up the findings from the SPSS output in paragraph format. Report and interpret the r-squared value, unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variable/predictor = BSSSTotal

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    2. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, cigarette use, and callous-unemotional traits?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Based on prior research, we believe that age, gender, ethnicity (Latino vs. Non-Latino), cigarette use, and CU traits (ICUTotal) may also be important in predicting alcohol use. Conduct multiple regression in SPSS controlling for these variables to determine if the association between the BSSS total and alcohol use still holds.

    · Write up the findings from the SPSS output in a single paragraph (do not use bullet points). Your paragraph should include: (1) interpretation of the r-squared value, (2) which variables are and are not significant, (3) report unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients for significant variables only (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples), and (4) discuss the relative effects for any significant predictors (i.e., compare the effects using the standardized regression coefficients). Statistics should be reported in the proper format (see examples provided below).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variables/predictors = BSSSTotal, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Cigarettes, and ICUTotal.

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    Submit your hypotheses and write-ups – I do not need your spss output.

    Reporting regression:

    · Make sure to interpret the R Square value as the percent of the variance explained in the outcome by all variables included in the model and report the F-statistic when reporting significance.

    · Examples:

    · In a bivariate regression model, self-control predicted 23% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .23, F(2, 108) = 4.47, p = .04.

    · Age, gender, race, and self-control were included in the model predicting delinquency. Together the predictors explained 33% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .33, F(4, 108) = 5.67, p = .03.

    · When interpreting the unstandardized regression coefficients make sure to provide the proper interpretation:

    · Example: Self-control had a significant negative impact on delinquency (B = -.673, p = .002). Specifically, for every one unit increase on the self-control scale, there was a .673 decrease in self-reported delinquency.

    · Make sure to interpret the standardized regression coefficients in terms of standard deviation units and to report the standardized regression coefficients when discussing the relative magnitude of their effects on the outcome:

    · Example: Although both were significant predictors of delinquency, the effect of self-control (b = -.51, p = .002) was stronger than the effect for age (b = .23, p = .03). That is, for every one standard deviation increase in self-control there was a .51 standard deviation unit decrease in delinquency compared to only a .23 standard deviation increase associated with a one unit standard deviation increase for age.

    **classs_survey-11.sav**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classs-survey-11-sav-10364399)

    **## BivariateandMultivariateRegression.docx**

    Using the class_survey dataset, you are going to address the following research questions:

    1. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Conduct regression analysis in SPSS to determine if scores on the BSSS Total (BSSSTotal) predict alcohol use (Alcohol). Write up the findings from the SPSS output in paragraph format. Report and interpret the r-squared value, unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variable/predictor = BSSSTotal

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    2. Do scores on the BSSS predict alcohol use controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, cigarette use, and callous-unemotional traits?

    · State your null and research hypothesis.

    · Based on prior research, we believe that age, gender, ethnicity (Latino vs. Non-Latino), cigarette use, and CU traits (ICUTotal) may also be important in predicting alcohol use. Conduct multiple regression in SPSS controlling for these variables to determine if the association between the BSSS total and alcohol use still holds.

    · Write up the findings from the SPSS output in a single paragraph (do not use bullet points). Your paragraph should include: (1) interpretation of the r-squared value, (2) which variables are and are not significant, (3) report unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients for significant variables only (direction, change in Y given X, significance – see below for examples), and (4) discuss the relative effects for any significant predictors (i.e., compare the effects using the standardized regression coefficients). Statistics should be reported in the proper format (see examples provided below).

    · Dependent variable = Alcohol

    · Independent variables/predictors = BSSSTotal, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Cigarettes, and ICUTotal.

    · State your conclusion in terms of the null hypothesis.

    Submit your hypotheses and write-ups – I do not need your spss output.

    Reporting regression:

    · Make sure to interpret the R Square value as the percent of the variance explained in the outcome by all variables included in the model and report the F-statistic when reporting significance.

    · Examples:

    · In a bivariate regression model, self-control predicted 23% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .23, F(2, 108) = 4.47, p = .04.

    · Age, gender, race, and self-control were included in the model predicting delinquency. Together the predictors explained 33% of the variance in delinquency, R2 = .33, F(4, 108) = 5.67, p = .03.

    · When interpreting the unstandardized regression coefficients make sure to provide the proper interpretation:

    · Example: Self-control had a significant negative impact on delinquency (B = -.673, p = .002). Specifically, for every one unit increase on the self-control scale, there was a .673 decrease in self-reported delinquency.

    · Make sure to interpret the standardized regression coefficients in terms of standard deviation units and to report the standardized regression coefficients when discussing the relative magnitude of their effects on the outcome:

    · Example: Although both were significant predictors of delinquency, the effect of self-control (b = -.51, p = .002) was stronger than the effect for age (b = .23, p = .03). That is, for every one standard deviation increase in self-control there was a .51 standard deviation unit decrease in delinquency compared to only a .23 standard deviation increase associated with a one unit standard deviation increase for age.

    **classs_survey-11.sav**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classs-survey-11-sav-10364399)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] No ai

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Genogram: Create a genogram of your family history for thr **Neatness (10 points)** – **Legibility and Organization (5 points):** – **5 points:** Writing is clear, readable, and organized on one piece of paper. Completely legible and professional. – **3-4 points:** Mostly legible with minor issues (…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Genogram:
    Create a genogram of your family history for thr
    **Neatness (10 points)**
    – **Legibility and Organization (5 points):**
    – **5 points:** Writing is clear, readable, and organized on one piece of paper. Completely legible and professional.
    – **3-4 points:** Mostly legible with minor issues (e.g., small areas of crowding or light smudging).
    – **1-2 points:** Significant legibility issues or messy presentation.
    – **Use of Tools (5 points):**
    – **5 points:** Lines are drawn with a ruler or are computer-generated; symbols and text are neat and properly aligned. All lines and symbols are precise and well-organized.
    – **3-4 points:** Most lines and symbols are straight and organized, with minor alignment issues.
    – **1-2 points:** Frequent alignment issues or uneven lines detract from clarity.
    **Key (10 points)**
    – **Inclusion of Symbols (5 points):**
    – **5 points:** The key includes all symbols used in the genogram with clear explanations. Comprehensive and no errors or omissions.
    – **3-4 points:** Mostly complete but minor omissions or unclear details.
    – **1-2 points:** Incomplete or poorly explained key.
    – **Alignment with Genogram (5 points):**
    – **5 points:** Symbols used in the genogram match those defined in the key. Full alignment with no discrepancies.
    – **3-4 points:** Minor mismatches or inconsistencies.
    – **1-2 points:** Frequent mismatches between the key and the genogram.
    **Relationships (20 points)**
    – **Proband Identification (10 points):**
    – **10 points:** The individual who is the subject of the genogram (proband) is clearly and uniquely marked. Proband is clearly indicated and easy to locate.
    – **6-9 points:** Proband is marked, but the notation could be clearer.
    – **1-5 points:** Proband is difficult to identify or missing.
    – **Clarity of Relationships (10 points):**
    – **10 points:** Depictions of relationships (e.g., marriages, divorces, adoptions) are accurate and clear. All relationships are represented accurately with appropriate symbols and lines.
    – **6-9 points:** Most relationships are correct but with minor errors or omissions.
    – **1-5 points:** Multiple inaccuracies or unclear relationship representations.
    **Number of Levels (20 points)**
    – **Generational Representation (10 points):**
    – **10 points:** At least three levels for individuals without children and four levels for individuals with children. All required generations are represented and organized.
    – **6-9 points:** Missing one level or levels are incomplete.
    – **1-5 points:** Significant generational omissions or disorganization.
    – **Alignment of Levels (10 points):**
    – **10 points:** Individuals in the same generation (e.g., grandparents) are aligned horizontally. Perfect alignment for each generational level.
    – **6-9 points:** Mostly aligned with minor inconsistencies.
    – **1-5 points:** Frequent alignment issues or confusion within levels.
    **Age and Health Information (30 points)**
    – **Basic Information (15 points):**
    – **15 points:** Each individual includes sex, age or birth date, and age at death or date of death (if applicable). Complete and accurate information for all individuals.
    – **10-14 points:** Minor omissions or inaccuracies in a few cases.
    – **1-9 points:** Significant gaps or errors in basic information.
    – **Health Diagnoses (15 points):**
    – **15 points:** Includes known physical and mental health conditions for individuals where applicable. Comprehensive and accurate health information for most individuals.
    – **10-14 points:** Some individuals are missing health information, but omissions are minimal.
    – **1-9 points:** Many individuals lack health information or the information is inaccurate.
    **Overall Summary of Findings (10 points)**
    – **Identification of Cues (3 points):**
    – **3 points:** Recognizes familial patterns or concerns (e.g., hereditary illnesses, strained relationships). Identifies all major cues.
    – **2 points:** Identifies some major cues.
    – **1 point:** Few or no cues are identified.
    – **Analysis of Problems (4 points):**
    – **4 points:** Analyzes familial problems based on the genogram (e.g., health trends, relational issues). Thorough and insightful analysis.
    – **2-3 points:** Basic analysis with some gaps in depth or clarity.
    – **1 point:** Analysis is superficial or incomplete.
    – **Solutions and Recommendations (3 points):**
    – **3 points:** Provides possible solutions or interventions for identified problems. Solutions are thoughtful and relevant.
    – **2 points:** Solutions are basic or lack detail.
    – **1 point:** Solutions are missing or irrelevant.

  • [Solved] podcast

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Ear Huste Podcast https://www.earhustlesq.com/

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Ear Huste Podcast
    https://www.earhustlesq.com/

  • [Solved] IPA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 20250730_085943.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-085943-jpg "20250730_085943.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    20250730_085943.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-085943-jpg "20250730_085943.jpg")

  • [Solved] Journal 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 20250730_090439.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-090439-jpg "20250730_090439.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    20250730_090439.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-090439-jpg "20250730_090439.jpg")

  • [Solved] Eff on adult health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 20250730_091123.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-091123-jpg "20250730_091123.jpg") \ 20250730_091035.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-091035-jpg "20250730_091035.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    20250730_091123.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-091123-jpg "20250730_091123.jpg")
    \
    20250730_091035.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250730-091035-jpg "20250730_091035.jpg")

  • [Solved] Week 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This week, you will focus on critically analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing methodology sections in dissertations. Review and reflect on the AES Model and Guide for Summarizing, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing Information using the SPL model to prepare for the assignment. Complete the Me…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This week, you will focus on critically analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing methodology sections in dissertations.
    Review and reflect on the AES Model and Guide for Summarizing, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing Information using the SPL model to prepare for the assignment.
    Complete the Method and Design AES Worksheet. This worksheet contains both the worksheet portion of the assignment and APA formatted paper sections to use for this assignment.
    \
    doc714s_v2_wk4_method_and_design_aes_worksheet1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doc714s-v2-wk4-method-and-design-aes-worksheet1-docx "doc714s_v2_wk4_method_and_design_aes_worksheet1.docx")
    \
    doc714s_v2_aes_model_and_guide_for_summarizing_analyzing_evaluating_and_synthesizing_information_ppt1.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doc714s-v2-aes-model-and-guide-for-summarizing-analyzing-evaluating-and-synthesizing-information-ppt1-pptx-10363957 "doc714s_v2_aes_model_and_guide_for_summarizing_analyzing_evaluating_and_synthesizing_information_ppt1.pptx")

  • [Solved] biology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering biology.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] ASSESSMENT 4_6008

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Due 08/01 – ## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx – ## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx **## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx** Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment. Collapse All **Health Care Financing** · [Assessment 4: Health Care Financing](https://capella.alma.exl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Due 08/01

    – ## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx

    – ## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx

    **## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Health Care Financing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Health Care Financing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491124570006731) reading list.

    **Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491133610006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 11, "Applying Health Economics to Influence Health Care Through Federal and State Policy Formation."

    · This chapter examines how to influence the development of policy at various levels of government.

    **Social Justice and Health Equity**

    Read the following resources. They may be helpful in completing Assessment 4:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Social Justice and Health Equity](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491145660006731) reading list.

    **Reflection**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Reflection](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491181910006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 12, "Epilogue: Reflections on Living and Leading in a Changing Nursing World."

    · This chapter offers a reflection of how to lead positive change in nursing.

    **## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx**

    Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.

    **Background and Context**

    As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.

    As a master's-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.

    Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.

    · Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.

    · Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.

    · Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    · Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Audience:** Make sure you are addressing your letter to an actual local or state official.

    · For most states, you can use the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Lobbying for Change](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491123430006731).

    · For local officials, search your city’s government website for officials and their positions.

    ·
    **Length of Submission:** 1–2 double spaced pages. Your letter needs to be succinct and persuasive.

    ·
    **Number of References:** Cite at least five sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

    **Note:** As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center's
    [Writing Support](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4646) page.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization's resources and its ability to provide quality care.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx**

    Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.

    **Background and Context**

    As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.

    As a master's-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.

    Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.

    · Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.

    · Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.

    · Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    · Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Audience:** Make sure you are addressing your letter to an actual local or state official.

    · For most states, you can use the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Lobbying for Change](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491123430006731).

    · For local officials, search your city’s government website for officials and their positions.

    ·
    **Length of Submission:** 1–2 double spaced pages. Your letter needs to be succinct and persuasive.

    ·
    **Number of References:** Cite at least five sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

    **Note:** As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center's
    [Writing Support](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4646) page.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization's resources and its ability to provide quality care.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Health Care Financing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Health Care Financing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491124570006731) reading list.

    **Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491133610006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 11, "Applying Health Economics to Influence Health Care Through Federal and State Policy Formation."

    · This chapter examines how to influence the development of policy at various levels of government.

    **Social Justice and Health Equity**

    Read the following resources. They may be helpful in completing Assessment 4:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Social Justice and Health Equity](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491145660006731) reading list.

    **Reflection**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Reflection](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491181910006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 12, "Epilogue: Reflections on Living and Leading in a Changing Nursing World."

    · This chapter offers a reflection of how to lead positive change in nursing.

    **## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx**

    Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.

    **Background and Context**

    As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.

    As a master's-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.

    Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.

    · Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.

    · Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.

    · Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    · Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Audience:** Make sure you are addressing your letter to an actual local or state official.

    · For most states, you can use the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Lobbying for Change](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491123430006731).

    · For local officials, search your city’s government website for officials and their positions.

    ·
    **Length of Submission:** 1–2 double spaced pages. Your letter needs to be succinct and persuasive.

    ·
    **Number of References:** Cite at least five sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

    **Note:** As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center's
    [Writing Support](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4646) page.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization's resources and its ability to provide quality care.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    **## Assessment4_6008_Resources.docx**

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Health Care Financing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Health Care Financing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491124570006731) reading list.

    **Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Advocacy, Lobbying, and Letter Writing](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491133610006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 11, "Applying Health Economics to Influence Health Care Through Federal and State Policy Formation."

    · This chapter examines how to influence the development of policy at various levels of government.

    **Social Justice and Health Equity**

    Read the following resources. They may be helpful in completing Assessment 4:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Social Justice and Health Equity](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491145660006731) reading list.

    **Reflection**

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Reflection](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491181910006731) reading list.

    ·
    [Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2674737490006731).

    · Chapter 12, "Epilogue: Reflections on Living and Leading in a Changing Nursing World."

    · This chapter offers a reflection of how to lead positive change in nursing.

    **## Assessment4_6008_instructions.docx**

    Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.

    **Background and Context**

    As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.

    As a master's-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.

    Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.

    · Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.

    · Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.

    · Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    · Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Audience:** Make sure you are addressing your letter to an actual local or state official.

    · For most states, you can use the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 4: Lobbying for Change](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2490763020006731?auth=SAML&section=2491123430006731).

    · For local officials, search your city’s government website for officials and their positions.

    ·
    **Length of Submission:** 1–2 double spaced pages. Your letter needs to be succinct and persuasive.

    ·
    **Number of References:** Cite at least five sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

    **Note:** As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center's
    [Writing Support](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4646) page.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.

    · Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

    · Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.

    · Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

    · Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.

    · Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

    · Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization's resources and its ability to provide quality care.

    · Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    – 1
    – 2