My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Special Occasion Speech

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SPECIAL OCCASION SPEECH: Review pages 195-205 in your text for specific information on content and type of special occasion speech you may want to present. Samples speeches shown on page 201 (wedding toast, award presentation, birthday celebration, etc.) The type and topic of this speech is your cho…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SPECIAL OCCASION SPEECH: Review pages 195-205 in your text for specific information on content and
    type of special occasion speech you may want to present. Samples speeches shown on page 201 (wedding toast,
    award presentation, birthday celebration, etc.) The type and topic of this speech is your choice. Visual aid and

  • [Solved] PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice. 1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.
    1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.
    2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.
    3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
    Conduct a literature review.
    4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:
    – If qualitative,
    – Identify the purpose of the study.
    – Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.
    – Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    – Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
    – Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.
    – Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    – Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    – Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.
    – Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.
    – Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.
    – Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.
    – If quantitative,
    – Identify the purpose and design of the study.
    – Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.
    – Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    – Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.
    – Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    – Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).
    – Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.
    – Outline how the data were analyzed.
    – Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    – Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.
    – Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.
    **Submission Instructions:**
    – The presentation is original work and logically organized.
    – Follow current APA format including citation of references.
    – The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.
    – Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.
    – Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    – Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
    \
    Week3AsignmentNUR611-1Huxleycorrections.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week3asignmentnur611-1huxleycorrections-docx-10363653 "Week3AsignmentNUR611-1Huxleycorrections.docx")

  • [Solved] 8D LEPHR

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    One important role of an HR professional is to distinguish state laws from federal laws – Research articles related to HR responsibilities in the implementation of state laws that are distinguishable from federal Laws. (e.g., right-to-work, benefits like vacation pay, minimum wage, and others). – Id…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    One important role of an HR professional is to distinguish state laws from federal laws
    – Research articles related to HR responsibilities in the implementation of state laws that are distinguishable from federal Laws. (e.g., right-to-work, benefits like vacation pay, minimum wage, and others).
    – Identify a particular federal law and related state law.
    What advice concerning these laws would you provide if you were an HR professional advising top executives who had employees in different states and possibly other countries?
    Submission, APA, 3 paragraphs

  • [Solved] Health Promotion Discussion Week 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #### **Addressing Stigma and Barriers to Substance Use Treatment** **Objective:** This discussion post aims to foster a reflective and empathetic understanding of the stigma associated with substance use treatment and to identify potential barriers to accessing mental health services. By considering…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #### **Addressing Stigma and Barriers to Substance Use Treatment**
    **Objective:** This discussion post aims to foster a reflective and empathetic understanding of the stigma associated with substance use treatment and to identify potential barriers to accessing mental health services. By considering both personal and marginalized perspectives, you will gain insights into the challenges faced by individuals seeking help for substance use-related issues.
    **Assignment Instructions:**
    **Introduction:**
    – **Contextualize the Issue:**
    – Begin by discussing the significant stigma surrounding receiving treatment for substance use-related issues. Reference relevant studies or reports that highlight how stigma can impact individuals seeking help and the broader implications for public health.
    **1. Personal Reflection:**
    – **Reflect on Your Social Circle and Community:**
    – **Receptivity and Support:**
    – Reflect on your personal experiences and consider whether your friends and family would be receptive and supportive if you sought treatment for drug use issues. Discuss factors that might influence their reactions, such as cultural beliefs, awareness of substance use issues, and prior experiences with mental health treatment.
    – **Questions to Consider:**
    – Would your loved ones understand the importance of seeking treatment, or might there be misunderstandings or judgments?
    – How might your social circle's values and attitudes shape their support or lack thereof?
    – **Barriers to Accessing Treatment:**
    – Identify potential barriers you might experience when attempting to schedule an appointment with a behavioral health treatment center or provider. Consider logistical, financial, and social factors.
    – **Questions to Consider:**
    – Are there long wait times for appointments in your area?
    – Are there financial constraints, such as a lack of insurance coverage or high out-of-pocket costs?
    – Are there cultural or societal stigmas that might deter you from seeking help?
    **2. Empathetic Perspective:**
    – **Putting Yourself in the Shoes of Someone Marginalized:**
    – **Identifying Additional Barriers:**
    – Imagine being someone who is marginalized in your social circle or community. Discuss additional barriers they might experience when attempting to access mental health services.
    – **Factors to Consider:**
    – **Socioeconomic Status:** How might limited financial resources and lack of insurance exacerbate barriers to treatment?
    – **Cultural and Linguistic Barriers:** How might language differences and cultural misunderstandings hinder access to care?
    – **Social Isolation:** How might a lack of social support and networks contribute to feelings of helplessness and prevent individuals from seeking help?
    – **Discrimination and Prejudice:** How might experiences of discrimination or prejudice in healthcare settings discourage marginalized individuals from pursuing treatment?
    – **Questions to Consider:**
    – What specific challenges might someone face if they belong to a racial or ethnic minority group, LGBTQ+ community, or are living with a disability?
    – How can systemic issues, such as institutional biases or lack of culturally competent care, impact their ability to access services?
    **3. Critical Analysis and Solutions:**
    – **Analyze the Impact of Stigma and Barriers:**
    – Critically analyze how stigma and barriers to accessing treatment can affect the health outcomes and well-being of individuals with substance use-related issues. Use evidence from scholarly sources to support your analysis.
    – **Consider Broader Implications:**
    – Discuss how addressing stigma and improving access to treatment can benefit public health and reduce the overall burden of substance use disorders in communities.
    – **Propose Solutions:**
    – Suggest strategies to overcome the identified barriers and reduce stigma associated with substance use treatment. Consider the roles of healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations.
    – **Examples of Strategies:**
    – **Education and Awareness Campaigns:** Promote understanding and acceptance of substance use treatment through public education initiatives.
    – **Culturally Competent Care:** Advocate for training healthcare providers in cultural competency to better serve diverse populations.
    – **Policy Changes:** Support policies that increase funding for mental health services, reduce financial barriers, and ensure equitable access to care.
    **Conclusion:**
    – **Summarize Key Points:**
    – Recap the main insights gained from reflecting on personal and marginalized perspectives regarding the stigma and barriers to substance use treatment.
    Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.
    As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 400 words initial, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 3 years.

  • [Solved] Project #3: Presentation for Board of Directors

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Check the uploaded files – ## CSIA485Project3-Presentationv2022-1.docx **## CSIA485Project3-Presentationv2022-1.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/project-3-presentation-for-board-of-directors)**CSIA 485: Practical Applications in Cybersecurity Management & Policy** ## Project #3: Pres…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Check the uploaded files

    – ## CSIA485Project3-Presentationv2022-1.docx

    **## CSIA485Project3-Presentationv2022-1.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/project-3-presentation-for-board-of-directors)**CSIA 485: Practical Applications in Cybersecurity Management & Policy**

    ## Project #3: Presentation for Board of Directors

    ### Your Task:

    Padgett-Beale’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) has tasked you to continue supporting the Merger & Acquisition team’s efforts to bring Island Banking Services’ security program into compliance with U.S. laws and regulations. The M&A team has provisionally accepted the draft cybersecurity strategy and draft implementation plan which you prepared previously. The M&A team has now requested that you contribute a set of summary slides for the M&A team’s Decision Briefing (presentation) to the Padgett-Beale Board of Directors. This briefing is one of the final steps in obtaining approval for the M&A team’s plan for integrating the newly purchased company – Island Banking Services – into Padgett-Beale as Padgett-Beale, Inc Financial Services (PBI-FS).

    Before you begin developing your presentation, review your work products from Projects 1 & 2. As you do so, identify the most likely or most significant barriers to success (factors which increase the risk of failure). These can include barriers arising from external factors as well as issues arising from internal company sources. Consider culture and organizational conflict as well as legal and regulatory issues. For each factor, identify a countermeasure or compensatory action which the company could take to reduce the risk of failure. Select the five most significant barriers to success from your analysis. You will include these in your presentation slides.

    ### Develop Your Presentation:

    Using your prior work (Projects 1 & 2), develop a high-level summary presentation of your Cybersecurity Strategy and the Implementation Plan. You will need between 20-30 slides to fully address the requirements listed below; this slide count includes the slides for titles, section titles, and references. Remember to include speaker notes for the agenda slide, section title slides, and content slides. Your notes should be at least 20 words / one paragraph but no longer than 150 words / 3 paragraphs per slide.

    Your presentation must include the following:

    · Title Slide with title, your name, the date, and this course

    · Agenda Slide

    · Overview of the M&A effort (multiple slides – use the assignment overviews / background sections to put together a summary that answers: who, what, where, why, how)

    · Section Title Slide: Cybersecurity Strategy

    · Content Slides: provide a summary of your proposed Cybersecurity Strategy (Project 1)

    · Section Title Slide: Cybersecurity Implementation Plan

    · Content Slides: provide a summary of your proposed Cybersecurity Implementation Plan

    · Section Title Slide: Barriers to Success

    · Content Slides: five separate slides – one for each factor (identify each barrier to success and provide a recommended countermeasure or compensating action that the company could implement to reduce the risk of failure). This section will expand upon your “barriers to success” as discussed in Project #2.

    · Section Title Slide: Summary & Recommendations

    · Content Slide: present a recommendation that the strategy & implementation plan be approved by the Board of Directors for adoption and implementation by the company. Include 5 major business benefits of adoption and implementation. This may be new content (not previously included in projects 1 & 2).

    · Section Title Slide: References

    · Content Slides(s) that include reference list entries for your resources. Do not cite your own work for Projects 1 & 2.

    ### Putting It All Together

    MS Power Point .pptx format is the preferred delivery format; this application can be accessed via the Web or downloaded from UMGC under the university’s enterprise license for student use of Office 365. For more information see:
    [https://www.umgc.edu/help/help-article-base.html?knowledgeArticleId=kA00W000000sZpeSAE&articleType=FAQ_IT__kav](https://www.umgc.edu/help/help-article-base.html?knowledgeArticleId=kA00W000000sZpeSAE&articleType=FAQ_IT__kav)

    If you are unable to use Power Point, you may use another presentation application to create your slides and speaker notes. After you have done so, print your presentation slides to PDF and deliver the assignment as a PDF document. If you deliver as PDF, you must make sure that your speaker notes are visible and accompany each slide.

    ### Additional Information

    1. Consult the grading rubric for specific content and formatting requirements for this assignment.

    2. Your presentation should be professional in appearance with consistent use of fonts, font sizes, margins, etc.

    3. You must include a title slide with the assignment title, your name, and the due date. Your reference list must be on a separate slide at the end of your file.

    4. You are expected to write grammatically correct English in every assignment that you submit for grading. Do not turn in any work without (a) using spell check, (b) using grammar check, (c) verifying that your punctuation is correct and (d) reviewing your work for correct word usage and correctly structured sentences and paragraphs.

    5. You are expected to credit your sources using in-text citations and reference list entries. Both your citations and your reference list entries must follow a consistent citation style (APA, MLA, etc.). To reduce visual clutter, you may put citations for sources into footnotes at the bottom of your slides (instead of putting citations at the ends of bullet points).

    **Copyright © 2022 by University of Maryland Global Campus. All rights reserved.**

    ## image1.png

    **## CSIA485Project3-Presentationv2022-1.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/project-3-presentation-for-board-of-directors)**CSIA 485: Practical Applications in Cybersecurity Management & Policy**

    ## Project #3: Presentation for Board of Directors

    ### Your Task:

    Padgett-Beale’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) has tasked you to continue supporting the Merger & Acquisition team’s efforts to bring Island Banking Services’ security program into compliance with U.S. laws and regulations. The M&A team has provisionally accepted the draft cybersecurity strategy and draft implementation plan which you prepared previously. The M&A team has now requested that you contribute a set of summary slides for the M&A team’s Decision Briefing (presentation) to the Padgett-Beale Board of Directors. This briefing is one of the final steps in obtaining approval for the M&A team’s plan for integrating the newly purchased company – Island Banking Services – into Padgett-Beale as Padgett-Beale, Inc Financial Services (PBI-FS).

    Before you begin developing your presentation, review your work products from Projects 1 & 2. As you do so, identify the most likely or most significant barriers to success (factors which increase the risk of failure). These can include barriers arising from external factors as well as issues arising from internal company sources. Consider culture and organizational conflict as well as legal and regulatory issues. For each factor, identify a countermeasure or compensatory action which the company could take to reduce the risk of failure. Select the five most significant barriers to success from your analysis. You will include these in your presentation slides.

    ### Develop Your Presentation:

    Using your prior work (Projects 1 & 2), develop a high-level summary presentation of your Cybersecurity Strategy and the Implementation Plan. You will need between 20-30 slides to fully address the requirements listed below; this slide count includes the slides for titles, section titles, and references. Remember to include speaker notes for the agenda slide, section title slides, and content slides. Your notes should be at least 20 words / one paragraph but no longer than 150 words / 3 paragraphs per slide.

    Your presentation must include the following:

    · Title Slide with title, your name, the date, and this course

    · Agenda Slide

    · Overview of the M&A effort (multiple slides – use the assignment overviews / background sections to put together a summary that answers: who, what, where, why, how)

    · Section Title Slide: Cybersecurity Strategy

    · Content Slides: provide a summary of your proposed Cybersecurity Strategy (Project 1)

    · Section Title Slide: Cybersecurity Implementation Plan

    · Content Slides: provide a summary of your proposed Cybersecurity Implementation Plan

    · Section Title Slide: Barriers to Success

    · Content Slides: five separate slides – one for each factor (identify each barrier to success and provide a recommended countermeasure or compensating action that the company could implement to reduce the risk of failure). This section will expand upon your “barriers to success” as discussed in Project #2.

    · Section Title Slide: Summary & Recommendations

    · Content Slide: present a recommendation that the strategy & implementation plan be approved by the Board of Directors for adoption and implementation by the company. Include 5 major business benefits of adoption and implementation. This may be new content (not previously included in projects 1 & 2).

    · Section Title Slide: References

    · Content Slides(s) that include reference list entries for your resources. Do not cite your own work for Projects 1 & 2.

    ### Putting It All Together

    MS Power Point .pptx format is the preferred delivery format; this application can be accessed via the Web or downloaded from UMGC under the university’s enterprise license for student use of Office 365. For more information see:
    [https://www.umgc.edu/help/help-article-base.html?knowledgeArticleId=kA00W000000sZpeSAE&articleType=FAQ_IT__kav](https://www.umgc.edu/help/help-article-base.html?knowledgeArticleId=kA00W000000sZpeSAE&articleType=FAQ_IT__kav)

    If you are unable to use Power Point, you may use another presentation application to create your slides and speaker notes. After you have done so, print your presentation slides to PDF and deliver the assignment as a PDF document. If you deliver as PDF, you must make sure that your speaker notes are visible and accompany each slide.

    ### Additional Information

    1. Consult the grading rubric for specific content and formatting requirements for this assignment.

    2. Your presentation should be professional in appearance with consistent use of fonts, font sizes, margins, etc.

    3. You must include a title slide with the assignment title, your name, and the due date. Your reference list must be on a separate slide at the end of your file.

    4. You are expected to write grammatically correct English in every assignment that you submit for grading. Do not turn in any work without (a) using spell check, (b) using grammar check, (c) verifying that your punctuation is correct and (d) reviewing your work for correct word usage and correctly structured sentences and paragraphs.

    5. You are expected to credit your sources using in-text citations and reference list entries. Both your citations and your reference list entries must follow a consistent citation style (APA, MLA, etc.). To reduce visual clutter, you may put citations for sources into footnotes at the bottom of your slides (instead of putting citations at the ends of bullet points).

    **Copyright © 2022 by University of Maryland Global Campus. All rights reserved.**

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] PES Discussion Week 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe the seven key focus areas for diabetes management espoused by the Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists (ADCES). Instruction: Discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words initial, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 2 scholar…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe the seven key focus areas for diabetes management espoused by the Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists (ADCES).
    Instruction:
    Discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words initial, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 3 years.

  • [Solved] 8-2 LEPHR

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As the start-up continues to scale and grow, the chief human resources officer (CHRO) has observed a noticeable uptick in complaints from present and former employees based on real or perceived violations of local, state, and federal employment laws. Complaints such as violations of the Family and M…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As the start-up continues to scale and grow, the chief human resources officer (CHRO) has observed a noticeable uptick in complaints from present and former employees based on real or perceived violations of local, state, and federal employment laws. Complaints such as violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and pay, along with allegations of discrimination and wrongful termination, have started to grow along with the organization. While not having a significant impact on the business, the importance of firmly establishing consistent business practices to support employment law requirements is a concern with the continued growth planned.
    ## Directions
    After reviewing recent concerns, the CHRO and in-house counsel have asked you to craft an email to share with leaders across the organization. For this email, you have been asked to select three to four employment laws that you feel are important. While the code of conduct, policies, and other annual and new-employee training sessions are sufficient, the time has come to ensure that the leaders understand their role in supporting employment law within the organization.
    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
    1. **Email Considerations:**Prepare an email that includes an appropriate subject line, recipients, date and time, and signature.
    1. It is important to consider precisely what group the email will be sent to. Will it be sent as a company communication in which employees can “reply all” or as a “BCC” in which employees will not be able to respond? Why is it important that this group receive this email?
    2. **Ethical Implications:** Describe the ethical implications that should be considered in the situation provided.
    3. **Legal Implications:** Describe legal implications that should be considered in the situation, including specific laws applicable.
    4. **Specific Approach:** Recommend a specific approach for meeting organizational needs while maintaining ethical and responsible practices.
    Submission, APA, 2 pages

  • [Solved] Nursing MODULE 3 ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it. – ## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx** **Start by reading and following these instructions:** 1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommend…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Consider the discussion and the any insights you      gained from it.

    – ## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx

    – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    **## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones &

    Bartlett Learning. Read
    **chapters 7 & 11.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th

    ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters
    **6, 7, & 8.**

    Additional Resources

    Aspen University Library.(2020, January). Guide: Conducting a literature review.

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/19391-LIB/Conducting%20a%20

    Literature%20Review.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=rLrwiD8yyMhvXyoTomcIB9EcT

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
    [https://www.ahrq.gov/](https://www.ahrq.gov/) programs/index.html

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones &

    Bartlett Learning. Read
    **chapters 7 & 11.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th

    ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters
    **6, 7, & 8.**

    Additional Resources

    Aspen University Library.(2020, January). Guide: Conducting a literature review.

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/19391-LIB/Conducting%20a%20

    Literature%20Review.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=rLrwiD8yyMhvXyoTomcIB9EcT

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
    [https://www.ahrq.gov/](https://www.ahrq.gov/) programs/index.html

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **## WEEK3ESSAYASSIGNMENT.docx**

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones &

    Bartlett Learning. Read
    **chapters 7 & 11.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th

    ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters
    **6, 7, & 8.**

    Additional Resources

    Aspen University Library.(2020, January). Guide: Conducting a literature review.

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/19391-LIB/Conducting%20a%20

    Literature%20Review.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=rLrwiD8yyMhvXyoTomcIB9EcT

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
    [https://www.ahrq.gov/](https://www.ahrq.gov/) programs/index.html

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    7/28/25, 7:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956652/View 1/6

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] MODULE 3 JOURNAL QUESTION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Immersion courses have 125 hours – ## Journalquestionweek3.docx – ## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx **## Journalquestionweek3.docx** **Journal Question:** After review of the DNP 2.0 Residency video, respond to the following questions: · Immersion courses have 125 hours associated with each cour…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Immersion courses have 125 hours

    – ## Journalquestionweek3.docx

    – ## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Journalquestionweek3.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    After review of the DNP 2.0 Residency video, respond to the following questions:

    · Immersion courses have 125 hours associated with each course. What is your plan to accomplish completion of the required hours?

    · Describe your topic for the DNP project.  Include the population, gap, EBP implementation, and intended outcomes.

    · What barriers do you anticipate during the duration of enrollment in a DNP program?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Journal responses must be entered. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words;** no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.

    “My DNP project will focus on improving outcomes among Black adults with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes through increased usage of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs). The population consists patients aged 40–70 with HbA1c levels ≥9%, seen at a community-based primary care clinic.

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journalquestionweek3.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    After review of the DNP 2.0 Residency video, respond to the following questions:

    · Immersion courses have 125 hours associated with each course. What is your plan to accomplish completion of the required hours?

    · Describe your topic for the DNP project.  Include the population, gap, EBP implementation, and intended outcomes.

    · What barriers do you anticipate during the duration of enrollment in a DNP program?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Journal responses must be entered. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words;** no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.

    “My DNP project will focus on improving outcomes among Black adults with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes through increased usage of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs). The population consists patients aged 40–70 with HbA1c levels ≥9%, seen at a community-based primary care clinic.

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journalquestionweek3.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    After review of the DNP 2.0 Residency video, respond to the following questions:

    · Immersion courses have 125 hours associated with each course. What is your plan to accomplish completion of the required hours?

    · Describe your topic for the DNP project.  Include the population, gap, EBP implementation, and intended outcomes.

    · What barriers do you anticipate during the duration of enrollment in a DNP program?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Journal responses must be entered. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words;** no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.

    “My DNP project will focus on improving outcomes among Black adults with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes through increased usage of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs). The population consists patients aged 40–70 with HbA1c levels ≥9%, seen at a community-based primary care clinic.

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    7/28/25, 7:24 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-3-journal-question)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956651/View 1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Review Help Needed

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Is there anyone that could possibly review my law school application documents before I submit them and let me know your honest opinion and what needs to be corrected And what other documents I may be missing. Documents include: personal statement, gpa addendum, character and fitness addendum, diver…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Is there anyone that could possibly review my law school application documents before I submit them and let me know your honest opinion and what needs to be corrected And what other documents I may be missing. Documents include: personal statement, gpa addendum, character and fitness addendum, diversity statements.
    \
    GPAAddendum.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gpaaddendum-docx "GPAAddendum.docx")
    \
    Personalstatement.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/personalstatement-docx-10363465 "Personalstatement.docx")
    \
    LSACDiversityStatement.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lsacdiversitystatement-docx "LSACDiversityStatement.docx")
    \
    CharacterandFitnessAddendum.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/characterandfitnessaddendum-docx "CharacterandFitnessAddendum.docx")
    \
    SchoolsDiversityStatement.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/schoolsdiversitystatement-docx "SchoolsDiversityStatement.docx")