My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully. – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf – IMG_2654.jpeg – IMG_2652.jpeg – IMG_2653.jpeg **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf** Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf

    – IMG_2654.jpeg
    – IMG_2652.jpeg
    – IMG_2653.jpeg

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4

  • [Solved] rrr.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ good.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/good-pdf-10352289 "good.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    good.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/good-pdf-10352289 "good.pdf")

  • [Solved] 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] article

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    At least 4 implementation strategies At least 2 evaluation strategies (label as Structure, Process or Outcome Measure & note is pre data is applicable and note when short term and long-term data would be obtained) here is my article [http://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicines](http://www.mdpi.com/journal…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    At least 4 implementation strategies
    At least 2 evaluation strategies (label as Structure, Process or Outcome Measure   & note is pre data is applicable and note when short term and long-term data would be obtained)
    here is my article  [http://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicines](http://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicines)  .i also submitted a pdf of my article
    \
    ImplementationWorksheet420.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/implementationworksheet420-docx "ImplementationWorksheet420.docx")
    \
    medicines-08-00046-with-cover3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/medicines-08-00046-with-cover3-pdf "medicines-08-00046-with-cover3.pdf")

  • [Solved] db g

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    need today teacher keep providing work on same day due

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    need today teacher keep providing work on same day due

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_2638.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2638-jpeg-10352303 "IMG_2638.jpeg") \ IMG_2639.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2639-jpeg-10352305 "IMG_2639.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_2638.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2638-jpeg-10352303 "IMG_2638.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2639.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2639-jpeg-10352305 "IMG_2639.jpeg")

  • [Solved] discussion board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_4990.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4990-jpeg-10352475 "IMG_4990.jpeg") \ IMG_4989.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4989-jpeg-10352477 "IMG_4989.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_4990.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4990-jpeg-10352475 "IMG_4990.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_4989.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-4989-jpeg-10352477 "IMG_4989.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing ASSIGNMENT.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Health Promotion Discussion Week 3 Reply to Peer 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Week 3 Discussion: Food in Health Promotion** When we talk about health promotion, one of the most critical and often overlooked aspects is access to food. Not just any food, but safe, nutritious, and sufficient food that supports overall well-being. In this week’s discussion, I reflected on the c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Week 3 Discussion: Food in Health Promotion**
    When we talk about health promotion, one of the most critical and often overlooked aspects is access to food. Not just any food, but safe, nutritious, and sufficient food that supports overall well-being. In this week’s discussion, I reflected on the concepts of hunger and food insecurity, which although closely related, are not quite the same.
    Hunger is the physical sensation we feel when our bodies need food. It’s that immediate, biological response to not eating. Food insecurity, on the other hand, is a much broader and more complex issue. It refers to the lack of consistent access to enough food for an active, healthy life. According to the USDA (2023), food insecurity includes both the quantity and quality of food, as well as the uncertainty and stress that comes with not knowing where your next meal is coming from. So while someone might not be experiencing physical hunger at a given moment, they may still be food insecure.
    To understand how we’re addressing this issue in the U.S., I looked into two major nutrition assistance programs: SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). Both are cornerstones of our national response to food insecurity and target different vulnerable populations.
    SNAP primarily supports low-income individuals and families. It offers monthly benefits to help them buy groceries, giving recipients more autonomy in choosing their food. One clear benefit is that it improves diet quality and helps reduce food insecurity among working-age adults (Gregory & Coleman-Jensen, 2022). However, SNAP isn’t perfect. A frequent challenge is that the monthly benefits often aren’t enough to last the entire month, leaving families scrambling or skipping meals before their next allotment arrives (Leung et al., 2019).
    The NSLP focuses on school-aged children, offering free or reduced-price lunches during the school year. This program is essential in ensuring children from low-income families get at least one nutritious meal a day. It supports academic performance, reduces absenteeism, and promotes healthy growth (Ralston et al., 2021). But stigma can be a problem because some students avoid participating because they don’t want to be singled out, which can undermine the program’s impact.
    Looking at both programs together, it’s clear they do more than just provide food—they play a vital role in public health. By addressing social determinants like income and education, SNAP and NSLP help reduce health disparities and improve quality of life. These programs are also tied to larger public health goals, such as reducing obesity, improving chronic disease outcomes, and promoting lifelong healthy eating habits.
    In conclusion, food insecurity is a major public health issue that affects physical health, mental health, and social stability. Programs like SNAP and NSLP are essential tools in combating this problem, but they must be adequately funded, expanded, and destigmatized to reach their full potential. As a future healthcare provider, I see it as part of our responsibility to advocate for these programs and help connect patients to the resources they need. Promoting nutrition is not just about giving advice on healthy eating—it’s about ensuring people have access to food in the first place.
    **References**
    Gregory, C. A., & Coleman-Jensen, A. (2022). _Food insecurity, chronic disease, and health among working-age adults._ USDA Economic Research Report No. 235. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=104655
    Leung, C. W., Tester, J. M., & Rimm, E. B. (2019). SNAP participation and diet-sensitive cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents. _American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57_(4), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.020
    Ralston, K., Newman, C., Clauson, A., Guthrie, J., & Buzby, J. (2021). _The National School Lunch Program: Background, trends, and issues._ USDA Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/48755/ry245.pdf
    USDA. (2023). _Definitions of food security._ U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/
    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] WH D3 R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WH D3 R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.