Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] ENG 1252 MOD 5 DB

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx – ## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx** Eng 1252 mod 5 db **Instructions:** This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx

    – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx

    – ## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    **## ENG1252MOD5DBINFO2025.docx**

    Eng 1252 mod 5 db

    **Instructions:**

    This discussion will be completed in two parts, and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week's content and to interact with your classmates.

    · Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59pm

    · Part 2 – Post substantive feedback to two (2) classmates by Sunday at 11:59pm

    **Discussion Questions:**

    This week, you will be tasked with creating your own visual argument (see the Module 5 Assignment below). This discussion board will allow you to workshop your ideas for your visual argument with your classmates and engage in peer review.

    1. Discuss in a couple of sentences your own definition of visual argument.

    2. How will the terms of visual rhetoric help you plan and draft your visual argument?

    3. Share your thoughts about your plan for your visual argument.

    4. Do you think this will be easier than creating a written argument, or more challenging for you? Explain why.

    5. In response posts, comment on two (2) peers' posts.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.pptx**

    w

    Where We Are Now

    Where We Need To Be

    ## image9.jpg

    ## image10.jpg

    ## image11.jpg

    ## image12.jpg

    ## image1.jpg

    ## image2.jpg

    ## image3.jpg

    ## image4.jpg

    ## image5.jpg

    ## image6.jpg

    ## image7.jpg

    ## image8.jpg

    **## ENG1252MOD5DB2025.docx**

    2

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    Student

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    **Discussion: Visual Argument**

    A visual argument refers to the use of images, layouts, colors, and other design elements to communicate a particular idea or perspective to the audience. It is a way of persuading or influencing an audience through visual elements, which make a point, support a position, or make a point. Unlike verbal arguments that rely on words to make an argument, visual argument utilizes images. To plan and draft an effective visual argument, it is important to understand and use visual rhetoric like shape, size, color, and space. I plan on creating intentional choices in my design, therefore, I can use visual rhetoric components like bold colors to capture the audience's attention, and strategic placement of the images to guide the viewer's eyes to the argument.

    My plans to create an effective visual argument involve identifying a clear point to argue, which in this case is the plastic impact on the environment, then selecting appropriate visuals and organizing them to create a persuasive presentation. The argument will mainly focus on plastic impact on the ocean, thus I plan on using powerful images of clean oceans and contrasting them with polluted oceans. I will also use a darker color palette for the polluted side and brighter colors for the unpolluted side. The layout will also focus on drawing the viewer's eyes towards the central message.

    Compared to creating a written argument, creating a visual argument might be more challenging because it relies more on the relationship between different visual rhetoric components to create a clear argument. Furthermore, I am used on expressing personal opinions or arguments with words, and visual arguments requires communicating an argument without relying on too much text. Although it is a creative challenge, it is also an engaging and fun activity.

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] ENG 1252 MOD 5 ASSN 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    RE V ISE nO a I – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx** Surname 3 Name Professor Name Course Name Date **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs** The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rheto…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    RE   V ISE
    nO  a I

    – ## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx**

    Surname 3

    Name

    Professor Name

    Course Name

    Date

    **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs**

    The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rhetoric has been very important and planned. I began by using language techniques to interest my readers and show why the subject is significant. Focusing the discussion on how genetically modified plants play a global role in productive farming, food supplies, environment care, and technological improvements showed why the subject deserves attention. This was intended to show readers the major implications of GMOs and encourage them to look at the subject from both scientific and humanitarian standpoints.

    I drew my thesis and my essay structure using the rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, and pathos from Aristotle. Reliable academic findings, recent journal articles, and commentary from experts help establish the ethos of a text (Gubala, Larson and Melonçon). It gains the audience's trust by making it clear that my argument comes from valid sources. The logic behind my content is one example of my Logos. It begins with what GMOs are, then moves on to their benefits, and closes with an assessment of how they positively or negatively impact people, society, and the economy. I tried to make the structure clear by explaining how GMOs are adopted and result in better yields and less need for pesticides. Finally, though pathos is not a major theme, I included descriptions intended to touch my audience's feelings about how desperate the world's hunger can be, how hard it is for small-scale farmers, and how necessary it is to act ethically using technology.

    That being said, I believe that my work can be improved in two significant locations. My goal is to develop and enhance my use of various kinds of information. Sometimes, despite collecting a great deal of information, I have trouble smoothly connecting it to what I say. I will focus on using the correct ways to reference others (APA) and using signal phrases at the right times, so my paraphrasing or direct quoting doesn't change the style of my essay. I am also worried that I missed giving credit for some common ideas or results and I hope to confirm that all claims lead back to trustworthy sources. I get that adding well-integrated sources to my paper boosts its credibility and I wish to ensure my paper is not dominated by outside sources but has my analysis too.

    I also find it hard to explain how GMOs impact the economy and ethics. This field is involved and needs to be explained well and discussed with care (Anyshchenko). I am searching for ways to define "economic sustainability" and "bioethics" so that readers from diverse backgrounds can relate to them without being too basic. I also think that discussing GMOs abstractly can be clearer when illustrated with real-world case studies which is why I am introducing the success stories of Bt cotton in India and Golden Rice in Southeast Asia as case studies. Still, I am making sure that my presentation of ethics is fair and respectful, while also addressing reasons to disagree with my main point.

    My overall goal is to make a reasonable argument, rhetorically sound which not only informs but persuades my readers about the significance and value of genetically modified plants in modern agriculture. I welcome suggestions from peers as to how to further improve the clarity of my economic and moral arguments and how to incorporate and source the sources used in this essay more cleanly. Also, suggestions on how to improve my transitions between paragraphs and ways to strengthen my conclusion would be appreciated. Refining these elements, I think, will help me make my work more persuasive and professional in general.

    Works Cited
    Anyshchenko, A. " The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5) (2019): 855-872.
    Gubala, C, K Larson and L Melonçon. "Do writing errors bother professionals? An analysis of the most bothersome errors and how the writer’s ethos is affected." Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3) (2020): 250-286.

    **## ENG1252MOD5ASSN2025.docx**

    Surname 3

    Name

    Professor Name

    Course Name

    Date

    **Reflecting on Rhetoric in My Essay on GMOs**

    The process of preparing my essay, "The Benefits of Genetically Modified Plants (GMOs) in Agriculture," made it clear that rhetoric has been very important and planned. I began by using language techniques to interest my readers and show why the subject is significant. Focusing the discussion on how genetically modified plants play a global role in productive farming, food supplies, environment care, and technological improvements showed why the subject deserves attention. This was intended to show readers the major implications of GMOs and encourage them to look at the subject from both scientific and humanitarian standpoints.

    I drew my thesis and my essay structure using the rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, and pathos from Aristotle. Reliable academic findings, recent journal articles, and commentary from experts help establish the ethos of a text (Gubala, Larson and Melonçon). It gains the audience's trust by making it clear that my argument comes from valid sources. The logic behind my content is one example of my Logos. It begins with what GMOs are, then moves on to their benefits, and closes with an assessment of how they positively or negatively impact people, society, and the economy. I tried to make the structure clear by explaining how GMOs are adopted and result in better yields and less need for pesticides. Finally, though pathos is not a major theme, I included descriptions intended to touch my audience's feelings about how desperate the world's hunger can be, how hard it is for small-scale farmers, and how necessary it is to act ethically using technology.

    That being said, I believe that my work can be improved in two significant locations. My goal is to develop and enhance my use of various kinds of information. Sometimes, despite collecting a great deal of information, I have trouble smoothly connecting it to what I say. I will focus on using the correct ways to reference others (APA) and using signal phrases at the right times, so my paraphrasing or direct quoting doesn't change the style of my essay. I am also worried that I missed giving credit for some common ideas or results and I hope to confirm that all claims lead back to trustworthy sources. I get that adding well-integrated sources to my paper boosts its credibility and I wish to ensure my paper is not dominated by outside sources but has my analysis too.

    I also find it hard to explain how GMOs impact the economy and ethics. This field is involved and needs to be explained well and discussed with care (Anyshchenko). I am searching for ways to define "economic sustainability" and "bioethics" so that readers from diverse backgrounds can relate to them without being too basic. I also think that discussing GMOs abstractly can be clearer when illustrated with real-world case studies which is why I am introducing the success stories of Bt cotton in India and Golden Rice in Southeast Asia as case studies. Still, I am making sure that my presentation of ethics is fair and respectful, while also addressing reasons to disagree with my main point.

    My overall goal is to make a reasonable argument, rhetorically sound which not only informs but persuades my readers about the significance and value of genetically modified plants in modern agriculture. I welcome suggestions from peers as to how to further improve the clarity of my economic and moral arguments and how to incorporate and source the sources used in this essay more cleanly. Also, suggestions on how to improve my transitions between paragraphs and ways to strengthen my conclusion would be appreciated. Refining these elements, I think, will help me make my work more persuasive and professional in general.

    Works Cited
    Anyshchenko, A. " The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5) (2019): 855-872.
    Gubala, C, K Larson and L Melonçon. "Do writing errors bother professionals? An analysis of the most bothersome errors and how the writer’s ethos is affected." Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3) (2020): 250-286.

  • [Solved] DB

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached. – ## WK8DB.docx – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx **## WK8DB.docx** · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement. · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other. · Finally, please d…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached.

    – ## WK8DB.docx

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    **## WK8DB.docx**

    · Please discuss what might constitute an internal statement versus that of an external statement.

    · Additionally, please discuss when one might be completed as opposed to the other.

    · Finally, please discuss the importance of accurate and legible writing for both, internal and external statements and why clear, comprehensible writing is critical.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, reading assignments from class, lecture materials, the Bible, etc.).

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] theology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-2212-26-51am1-png "Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-2212-26-51am1-png "Screenshot2025-06-2212.26.51AM1.png")

  • [Solved] Research Paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached. – ## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx** CJUS 231 **Research Paper: Diff…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached.

    – ## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    **## ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 231

    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    For this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment**, students will prepare a research paper. Thus far, in the course, you have learned about the information and documentation required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, you have learned about the importance of both, internal and external statements and/or reports and the circumstances under which both might be completed.

    In this
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** – you should discuss the primary differences in report writing documentation for both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should also discuss, compare and contrast the primary differences between the use of internal and external statements and/or reports and when both might be utilized as well as the audience that might review either internal or external reports and investigations. All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where you will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources.

    Instructions

    The
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

    · Title Page;

    · Introduction;

    · Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

    · Reference Page

    All components of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

    The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

    The body of the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the
    **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

    The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Discuss the
    elements listed, to
    include the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony
    investigations.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    analysis and
    discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required
    to complete both,
    misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    analysis and discussion
    of the elements listed,
    to include the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    both, misdemeanor and
    felony investigations.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth in the analysis
    and discussion of the
    elements listed, to
    include the information
    that might be required to
    complete both,
    misdemeanor and felony
    investigations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss in-depth the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to
    external statements
    or reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    discussion of the
    purpose of internal
    statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no
    depth or does not
    discuss the purpose of
    internal statements in
    comparison to external
    statements or reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Discuss the
    information that
    might be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons
    for completing those
    reports, the
    necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    30 to >26 pts

    Advanced

    Provides an in-depth
    discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to
    complete those
    reports, the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity
    of ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might
    view these reports.

    26 to >20 pts

    Proficient

    Provides some depth in
    the discussion of the
    information that might
    be required to complete
    those reports, the
    reasons for completing
    those reports, the
    necessity of ensuring
    accuracy in reporting
    and the audience that
    might view these
    reports.

    20 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Provides little or no-
    depth or does not
    discuss the information
    that might be required to
    complete those reports,
    the reasons for
    completing those
    reports, the necessity of
    ensuring accuracy in
    reporting and the
    audience that might view
    these reports.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    30 pts

    Biblical or Christian
    Worldview Present

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Considers biblical
    foundations in-depth.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Some depth in
    discussion regarding
    biblical foundations.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Very little or no depth of
    discussion
    regarding biblical
    foundations.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Appropriate level of
    analysis and critical
    thinking

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a cogent
    and critical manner.
    Submission provides
    clear evidence of
    critical thinking.

    13 to >10 pts

    Proficient

    Ideas and concepts
    presented in a fairly
    clear manner.
    Submission provides
    some evidence of
    critical thinking.

    10 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Ideas and concepts are
    not clear.
    Submission provides
    very little or no evidence
    of critical thinking.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    15 pts

    Meets Length
    Requirement of at
    least 5 pages

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Submission meets or
    exceeds the required
    length.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Submission is within
    100 words of length
    requirement.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Submission is more or
    less than 100 words of
    the stated length
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Proper use of APA
    and Cites at Least 3
    Scholarly Sources

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least
    3 scholarly sources.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Very few errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and proper use
    and citation of at least 2
    scholarly sources.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Several errors in
    grammar, spelling or
    APA and/or improper
    use and citation of only
    1 scholarly source.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Grammar, Spelling
    and Clarity

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Little or no errors in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Some errors present in
    grammar, spelling, and
    diction.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Numerous errors in
    grammar, spelling,
    diction present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 150

    Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Grading
    Rubric | CJUS231_B06_202530

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Week595Discussiondraft.docx **## Week595Discussiondraft.docx** Week 595 Discussion case study Imagine a 64-year-old woman from a different cultural background than the healthcare provider. She has been living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for two years. She has been taking metformin (2000 mg/day)…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Week595Discussiondraft.docx

    **## Week595Discussiondraft.docx**

    Week 595 Discussion case study

    Imagine a 64-year-old woman from a different cultural background than the healthcare provider. She has been living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for two years. She has been taking metformin (2000 mg/day) without any issues. Her BMI is 32 kg/m². She also has high blood pressure (hypertension), which is well managed with a thiazide and an ACE inhibitor. Her cholesterol levels are under control with atorvastatin 10 mg. She doesn't smoke, drink, and is up-to-date with her vaccinations. However, her recent A1C reading is 7.8%.

    This patient is widowed and relies on her late husband's disability payments and a small pension. She's worried about the cost of any new medications. She primarily speaks her native language, with limited proficiency in English, and sometimes her son accompanies her for translation.

    Discuss and evaluate at least three treatment options, considering the benefits and drawbacks, based on the latest clinical guidelines and evidence. Include any other essential considerations.

    Additionally, in your response, list three specific programs or organizations in your city that can assist her in obtaining low-cost or free diabetes supplies, medications, or other diabetes-related resources. Include links to these unique resources in your area.

    In addition to your links, list high-level scholarly references to support your clinical decision-making. Do not use point-of-care references for this discussion.

    Due: July 5th

    Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references

    Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

    Peer Responses:

    **## Week595Discussiondraft.docx**

    Week 595 Discussion case study

    Imagine a 64-year-old woman from a different cultural background than the healthcare provider. She has been living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for two years. She has been taking metformin (2000 mg/day) without any issues. Her BMI is 32 kg/m². She also has high blood pressure (hypertension), which is well managed with a thiazide and an ACE inhibitor. Her cholesterol levels are under control with atorvastatin 10 mg. She doesn't smoke, drink, and is up-to-date with her vaccinations. However, her recent A1C reading is 7.8%.

    This patient is widowed and relies on her late husband's disability payments and a small pension. She's worried about the cost of any new medications. She primarily speaks her native language, with limited proficiency in English, and sometimes her son accompanies her for translation.

    Discuss and evaluate at least three treatment options, considering the benefits and drawbacks, based on the latest clinical guidelines and evidence. Include any other essential considerations.

    Additionally, in your response, list three specific programs or organizations in your city that can assist her in obtaining low-cost or free diabetes supplies, medications, or other diabetes-related resources. Include links to these unique resources in your area.

    In addition to your links, list high-level scholarly references to support your clinical decision-making. Do not use point-of-care references for this discussion.

    Due: July 5th

    Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references

    Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

    Peer Responses:

  • [Solved] How Organizations Modified Operations to adapt to the pandemic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment 10-12 page assignment. – ## FinalInstructions.docx **## FinalInstructions.docx** Intro: During the COVID-19 pandemic, human service organizations faced many challenges to provide optimal services to families in need. The needs of underserved communities grew and required additi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment 10-12 page assignment.

    – ## FinalInstructions.docx

    **## FinalInstructions.docx**

    Intro: During the COVID-19 pandemic, human service organizations faced many challenges to provide optimal services to families in need. The needs of underserved communities grew and required additional services. Yet, many organizations had limited resources and staffing to fill these new demands. Human service professionals began to experience vicarious trauma because of large caseloads and their inability to provide services. Some complained of compassion fatigue and apathy. Human service organizations began to change the type of services they provided to adapt to the needs of their communities.

    Instructions
    : Draft a 10–12-page paper on How Organizations Modified Operations to Adapt to the Pandemic Needs will investigate the obstacles created by the pandemic.

    (The Annotated Bibliography is already completed on Airbnb)

    · Select an organization, non-profit or governmental agency that redefined their business model to adapt to the pandemic challenges.

    · Identify the services that were altered to accommodate various needs during the pandemic (i.e., hotels provided extended stays for out-of-town nurses during COVID nursing shortages, the Gap & Athleta company created masks, Armbrust American created N95 respirators).

    · Explore the best leadership style for this organizational change.

    · Examine the change management approach used.

    · Describe how emotional intelligence was applied to service delivery.

    · Evaluate the strategies that can help a human service professional overcome compassion fatigue during service delivery.

    · Compare self-care methods that human service professionals can use to overcome apathy.

    APA Citation-Required

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    The COVID-19 pandemic forced organizations globally to take a deeper evaluation of their operations to adapt to challenges never seen before. The evaluations were needed to prevent internal loss, improve their business model, and keep the business heartbeat strong to survive. Many businesses faced these challenges, and one of the most distinctive companies to adapt to the unprecedented times was Airbnb. Airbnb emerged as an example of resilience and innovation. The leadership mindset shifted as Airbnb was formerly known for short-term vacation rentals. Still, after triaging the environment, they could pivot their services and begin accommodating long-term stays and virtual experiences. This focus was tailored more for remote workers and prudent travelers. We will explore Airbnb's strategic adaptation during the pandemic. This transformation was profoundly grounded in leadership, change management, and employee well-being.

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    **Organization Overview: Airnb's Business Model Shift**

    Reinhold, S., & Dolnicar, S. (2021). The evolution of Airbnb’s business model. Uq.pressbooks.pub.
    [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14195957](https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14195957)

    Reinhold provides a comprehensive overview of how Airbnb conditioned its business model because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The author further highlights Airbnb's change management shift from short-term vacation rentals towards long-term stays, accommodating remote workers into their business mix and including more virtual experiences. This ability to adapt helped Airbnb remain relevant by responding to consumers' transition needs. This article supports that strategic adaptability is not about survival but more about realigning services and creating new realities. It helped Airbnb to create a new frame and become proactive and innovative instead of complacent and reactive.

    Adamiak, C. (2021). Changes in the global Airbnb offer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Adamiak's study used data highlighting Airbnb's services by offering a change based on geographical and strategic changes during the pandemic. The research supports a decline in urban listings but a rise in rural and suburban accommodations, supporting a shift in consumers' purchasing behavior. This evidence is vital as it captures Airbnb's adaptability and supports the company in realigning its services by cross-referencing emerging trends. This concept reinforces the essential components of data-driven decision-making while incorporating strategic planning. Through Airbnb's flexibility and open model business lens, their innovation allowed them to gain and maintain a competitive advantage during a global crisis.

    **Leadership Styles**

    Carrington Legal. (2020).
    _Lessons in leadership during COVID-19: Airbnb_.
    [https://carringtonlegal.com/blog/lessons-in-leadership-during-covid-19-airbnb](https://carringtonlegal.com/blog/lessons-in-leadership-during-covid-19-airbnb)

    The article illustrates the leadership that Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky executed during one of the most vulnerable and challenging times in the company's history. Chesky's transformational leadership style resonated with their colleagues through his communication, empathetic decision-making, and prioritization for employees' well-being while having to go through a complex process of laying off constituents. The article supports effective leadership while experiencing a crisis, which requires more than just strategic thinking; it demands emotional intelligence and putting people first. The CEO's actions helped elevate and preserve trust while boosting morale even as the company was revamping significantly.

    Forbes. (2020).
    _How Airbnb survived the pandemic_.
    [https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2020/11/10/how-airbnb-survived-the-pandemic–and-how-you-can-too/](https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2020/11/10/how-airbnb-survived-the-pandemic–and-how-you-can-too/)

    The article reinforces Airbnb's CEO Chesky's role as a transformational leader through innovation and emphasizes his commitment to the company's core values and long-term vision. The article illustrates how Chesky maintained strategic clarity while chartering through a choppy, unstable environment. It is also important to highlight how the organization prioritizes emotionally intelligent leadership by guiding the company through rapid change. The article also points towards how leaders can inspire resilience and innovate others by remaining grounded with purpose and authentic communication. This demonstrated Chesky's senior leadership, which galvanized Airbnb and helped it gain a renewed sense of direction and identity, which was born through a crisis environment.

    **Change Management Styles**

    Lead Read Today. (2020).
    _Resilience, focus and the broader perspective: The case of Airbnb_. Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University.
    [https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/leadreadtoday/resilience-focus-and-broader-perspective-case-airbnb](https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/leadreadtoday/resilience-focus-and-broader-perspective-case-airbnb)

    The source dives into how Airbnb embraced adaptive change management, which helped navigate uncertainty during the pandemic. Instead of reacting impulsively, the CEO strategically measured his approach and began focusing on the company's core mission, listening to stakeholders, and making tough but much-needed adjustments. The article emphasizes the importance of resilience and long-term thinking while managing change. The article details how successful change management connects operational shifts, cultural commitment, flexibility, and ongoing learning.

    Inc. (2020).
    _3 important lessons from Airbnb's pandemic pivot_.
    [https://www.inc.com/akhil-kambhammettu/airbnb-brian-chesky-advice-for-pivoting.html](https://www.inc.com/akhil-kambhammettu/airbnb-brian-chesky-advice-for-pivoting.html)

    The article highlights Airbnb's leadership, which was implemented by understanding their community, hosts, guests, and employees. The company understood it needed to pivot quickly while being transparent and creating an empathetic environment, leading to a participative change management style. The article also shows how involving stakeholders in the change process helps build trust and reduce organizational resistance, including the board of directors. Lastly, the article sheds light on how there was trust in experimenting. Airbnb's willingness to experiment and allow an open mindset allowed the organization to adapt quickly and, as a result, was more effective while experiencing an evolving crisis.

    **Emotional Intelligence and Compassion Fatigue**

    Lluch, C., Galiana, L., Doménech, P., Sansó, N., & Vidal-Blanco, G. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction in healthcare personnel: A systematic review.
    _Healthcare, 10_(2), 364.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364](https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364)

    This study focuses on healthcare professionals. It also provides valuable insights into how emotional strain and compassion fatigue affect employees across sectors during a crisis. The study's results show how prolonged stress, uncertainty, and emotional labor lead to burnout and reduced job satisfaction. This information and data help frame the emotional challenges Airbnb employees likely faced during the pandemic, especially while experiencing layoffs, shifting roles, and a rapidly changing working environment. This study details how emotionally intelligent leadership recognizes and responds to different pressures while providing empathy and support.

    Wee, E. Y. M., & Fehr, R. (2021). Compassion during difficult times: Team compassion behavior and the role of leader affective presence.
    _Journal of Applied Psychology, 106_(4), 514–529.
    [https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000893](https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000893)

    This article details how leaders who demonstrate emotional intelligence with warmth, empathy, and presence act as a buffer for any adverse effects of stress and uncertainty. The ideology supports the thought that emotionally intelligent leadership is not a soft skill but a nonnegotiable factor in maintaining team cohesion and morale during challenging times. This article directly relates to Airbnb's leadership approach, being transparent and compassionate in communication, which helped employees feel seen, heard, and supported amid difficult decisions.

    **Self-Care Strategies for Human Service Professionals**

    National Association of Social Workers. (2020).
    _Self-care for social workers during the coronavirus pandemic_.
    [https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Infectious-Diseases/Coronavirus/Self-Care-During-the-Coronavirus-Pandemic](https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Infectious-Diseases/Coronavirus/Self-Care-During-the-Coronavirus-Pandemic)

    This resource covers practical strategies for managing stress and maintaining well-being during a crisis. The article covers the importance of setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, and staying connected with supportive peers. This guidance is primarily relevant for any human service professional navigating due to emotionally demanding work. These guided resources reinforce the idea that self-care is not optional. Sustainability must remain effective and avoid burnout, especially during prolonged periods of uncertainty similar to the pandemic.

    Ottawa University. (2020).
    _Best self-care practices during a pandemic_.
    [https://telfer.uottawa.ca/telfer-knowledge-hub/career-centre/covid-19-three-easy-ways-to-practice-self-care](https://telfer.uottawa.ca/telfer-knowledge-hub/career-centre/covid-19-three-easy-ways-to-practice-self-care)

    The article details the range of techniques associated with self-care, such as breathing exercises and journaling to maintain a routine. This helps professionals set boundaries, prioritize rest, and get the proper mental, physical, and psychological help they need. This article outlines a holistic approach by focusing on multiple faucets for proper well-being and illustrating to organizations that resilience is deeply connected to the health and sustainability of its people.

    The Pandemic was challenging for many. Some businesses experienced tremendous challenges and became victims of the tragic economic climate around them. Many other organizations, such as Airbnb, can adapt with purpose and lead by deploying empathy and making it a mission to prioritize innovation and well-being. Airbnb experienced a holistic restructuring in its business model, transformational leadership, and thoughtful change management. They were able to defy the odds and emerge with a new roadmap with a greater sense of direction. During this time, many employees experienced a lot of hardship due to layoffs

    **## FinalInstructions.docx**

    Intro: During the COVID-19 pandemic, human service organizations faced many challenges to provide optimal services to families in need. The needs of underserved communities grew and required additional services. Yet, many organizations had limited resources and staffing to fill these new demands. Human service professionals began to experience vicarious trauma because of large caseloads and their inability to provide services. Some complained of compassion fatigue and apathy. Human service organizations began to change the type of services they provided to adapt to the needs of their communities.

    Instructions
    : Draft a 10–12-page paper on How Organizations Modified Operations to Adapt to the Pandemic Needs will investigate the obstacles created by the pandemic.

    (The Annotated Bibliography is already completed on Airbnb)

    · Select an organization, non-profit or governmental agency that redefined their business model to adapt to the pandemic challenges.

    · Identify the services that were altered to accommodate various needs during the pandemic (i.e., hotels provided extended stays for out-of-town nurses during COVID nursing shortages, the Gap & Athleta company created masks, Armbrust American created N95 respirators).

    · Explore the best leadership style for this organizational change.

    · Examine the change management approach used.

    · Describe how emotional intelligence was applied to service delivery.

    · Evaluate the strategies that can help a human service professional overcome compassion fatigue during service delivery.

    · Compare self-care methods that human service professionals can use to overcome apathy.

    APA Citation-Required

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    The COVID-19 pandemic forced organizations globally to take a deeper evaluation of their operations to adapt to challenges never seen before. The evaluations were needed to prevent internal loss, improve their business model, and keep the business heartbeat strong to survive. Many businesses faced these challenges, and one of the most distinctive companies to adapt to the unprecedented times was Airbnb. Airbnb emerged as an example of resilience and innovation. The leadership mindset shifted as Airbnb was formerly known for short-term vacation rentals. Still, after triaging the environment, they could pivot their services and begin accommodating long-term stays and virtual experiences. This focus was tailored more for remote workers and prudent travelers. We will explore Airbnb's strategic adaptation during the pandemic. This transformation was profoundly grounded in leadership, change management, and employee well-being.

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    **Organization Overview: Airnb's Business Model Shift**

    Reinhold, S., & Dolnicar, S. (2021). The evolution of Airbnb’s business model. Uq.pressbooks.pub.
    [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14195957](https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14195957)

    Reinhold provides a comprehensive overview of how Airbnb conditioned its business model because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The author further highlights Airbnb's change management shift from short-term vacation rentals towards long-term stays, accommodating remote workers into their business mix and including more virtual experiences. This ability to adapt helped Airbnb remain relevant by responding to consumers' transition needs. This article supports that strategic adaptability is not about survival but more about realigning services and creating new realities. It helped Airbnb to create a new frame and become proactive and innovative instead of complacent and reactive.

    Adamiak, C. (2021). Changes in the global Airbnb offer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Adamiak's study used data highlighting Airbnb's services by offering a change based on geographical and strategic changes during the pandemic. The research supports a decline in urban listings but a rise in rural and suburban accommodations, supporting a shift in consumers' purchasing behavior. This evidence is vital as it captures Airbnb's adaptability and supports the company in realigning its services by cross-referencing emerging trends. This concept reinforces the essential components of data-driven decision-making while incorporating strategic planning. Through Airbnb's flexibility and open model business lens, their innovation allowed them to gain and maintain a competitive advantage during a global crisis.

    **Leadership Styles**

    Carrington Legal. (2020).
    _Lessons in leadership during COVID-19: Airbnb_.
    [https://carringtonlegal.com/blog/lessons-in-leadership-during-covid-19-airbnb](https://carringtonlegal.com/blog/lessons-in-leadership-during-covid-19-airbnb)

    The article illustrates the leadership that Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky executed during one of the most vulnerable and challenging times in the company's history. Chesky's transformational leadership style resonated with their colleagues through his communication, empathetic decision-making, and prioritization for employees' well-being while having to go through a complex process of laying off constituents. The article supports effective leadership while experiencing a crisis, which requires more than just strategic thinking; it demands emotional intelligence and putting people first. The CEO's actions helped elevate and preserve trust while boosting morale even as the company was revamping significantly.

    Forbes. (2020).
    _How Airbnb survived the pandemic_.
    [https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2020/11/10/how-airbnb-survived-the-pandemic–and-how-you-can-too/](https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2020/11/10/how-airbnb-survived-the-pandemic–and-how-you-can-too/)

    The article reinforces Airbnb's CEO Chesky's role as a transformational leader through innovation and emphasizes his commitment to the company's core values and long-term vision. The article illustrates how Chesky maintained strategic clarity while chartering through a choppy, unstable environment. It is also important to highlight how the organization prioritizes emotionally intelligent leadership by guiding the company through rapid change. The article also points towards how leaders can inspire resilience and innovate others by remaining grounded with purpose and authentic communication. This demonstrated Chesky's senior leadership, which galvanized Airbnb and helped it gain a renewed sense of direction and identity, which was born through a crisis environment.

    **Change Management Styles**

    Lead Read Today. (2020).
    _Resilience, focus and the broader perspective: The case of Airbnb_. Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University.
    [https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/leadreadtoday/resilience-focus-and-broader-perspective-case-airbnb](https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/leadreadtoday/resilience-focus-and-broader-perspective-case-airbnb)

    The source dives into how Airbnb embraced adaptive change management, which helped navigate uncertainty during the pandemic. Instead of reacting impulsively, the CEO strategically measured his approach and began focusing on the company's core mission, listening to stakeholders, and making tough but much-needed adjustments. The article emphasizes the importance of resilience and long-term thinking while managing change. The article details how successful change management connects operational shifts, cultural commitment, flexibility, and ongoing learning.

    Inc. (2020).
    _3 important lessons from Airbnb's pandemic pivot_.
    [https://www.inc.com/akhil-kambhammettu/airbnb-brian-chesky-advice-for-pivoting.html](https://www.inc.com/akhil-kambhammettu/airbnb-brian-chesky-advice-for-pivoting.html)

    The article highlights Airbnb's leadership, which was implemented by understanding their community, hosts, guests, and employees. The company understood it needed to pivot quickly while being transparent and creating an empathetic environment, leading to a participative change management style. The article also shows how involving stakeholders in the change process helps build trust and reduce organizational resistance, including the board of directors. Lastly, the article sheds light on how there was trust in experimenting. Airbnb's willingness to experiment and allow an open mindset allowed the organization to adapt quickly and, as a result, was more effective while experiencing an evolving crisis.

    **Emotional Intelligence and Compassion Fatigue**

    Lluch, C., Galiana, L., Doménech, P., Sansó, N., & Vidal-Blanco, G. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction in healthcare personnel: A systematic review.
    _Healthcare, 10_(2), 364.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364](https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364)

    This study focuses on healthcare professionals. It also provides valuable insights into how emotional strain and compassion fatigue affect employees across sectors during a crisis. The study's results show how prolonged stress, uncertainty, and emotional labor lead to burnout and reduced job satisfaction. This information and data help frame the emotional challenges Airbnb employees likely faced during the pandemic, especially while experiencing layoffs, shifting roles, and a rapidly changing working environment. This study details how emotionally intelligent leadership recognizes and responds to different pressures while providing empathy and support.

    Wee, E. Y. M., & Fehr, R. (2021). Compassion during difficult times: Team compassion behavior and the role of leader affective presence.
    _Journal of Applied Psychology, 106_(4), 514–529.
    [https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000893](https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000893)

    This article details how leaders who demonstrate emotional intelligence with warmth, empathy, and presence act as a buffer for any adverse effects of stress and uncertainty. The ideology supports the thought that emotionally intelligent leadership is not a soft skill but a nonnegotiable factor in maintaining team cohesion and morale during challenging times. This article directly relates to Airbnb's leadership approach, being transparent and compassionate in communication, which helped employees feel seen, heard, and supported amid difficult decisions.

    **Self-Care Strategies for Human Service Professionals**

    National Association of Social Workers. (2020).
    _Self-care for social workers during the coronavirus pandemic_.
    [https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Infectious-Diseases/Coronavirus/Self-Care-During-the-Coronavirus-Pandemic](https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Infectious-Diseases/Coronavirus/Self-Care-During-the-Coronavirus-Pandemic)

    This resource covers practical strategies for managing stress and maintaining well-being during a crisis. The article covers the importance of setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, and staying connected with supportive peers. This guidance is primarily relevant for any human service professional navigating due to emotionally demanding work. These guided resources reinforce the idea that self-care is not optional. Sustainability must remain effective and avoid burnout, especially during prolonged periods of uncertainty similar to the pandemic.

    Ottawa University. (2020).
    _Best self-care practices during a pandemic_.
    [https://telfer.uottawa.ca/telfer-knowledge-hub/career-centre/covid-19-three-easy-ways-to-practice-self-care](https://telfer.uottawa.ca/telfer-knowledge-hub/career-centre/covid-19-three-easy-ways-to-practice-self-care)

    The article details the range of techniques associated with self-care, such as breathing exercises and journaling to maintain a routine. This helps professionals set boundaries, prioritize rest, and get the proper mental, physical, and psychological help they need. This article outlines a holistic approach by focusing on multiple faucets for proper well-being and illustrating to organizations that resilience is deeply connected to the health and sustainability of its people.

    The Pandemic was challenging for many. Some businesses experienced tremendous challenges and became victims of the tragic economic climate around them. Many other organizations, such as Airbnb, can adapt with purpose and lead by deploying empathy and making it a mission to prioritize innovation and well-being. Airbnb experienced a holistic restructuring in its business model, transformational leadership, and thoughtful change management. They were able to defy the odds and emerge with a new roadmap with a greater sense of direction. During this time, many employees experienced a lot of hardship due to layoffs

  • [Solved] A01

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Offer a critique of the research content

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Offer a critique of the research content

  • [Solved] disc 1 504

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    use case study # one \ disc1part2504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/disc1part2504-png "disc1part2504.png") \ rubricfor504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubricfor504-png "rubricfor504.png") \ disc1part3504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/disc1part3504-png "disc1part3504.png") …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    use case study # one
    \
    disc1part2504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/disc1part2504-png "disc1part2504.png")
    \
    rubricfor504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubricfor504-png "rubricfor504.png")
    \
    disc1part3504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/disc1part3504-png "disc1part3504.png")
    \
    module1discpart1504.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module1discpart1504-png "module1discpart1504.png")

  • [Solved] Marketing Excel set up help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I struggle setting up these excel sheets. If you can work out the excel sheet and maybe break it down how to do it. I can attempt to answer these questions for my homework \ Homework2-4.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/homework2-4-docx-10337877 "Homework2-4.docx") \ Homework2data.xlsx](https…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I struggle setting up these excel sheets. If you can work out the excel sheet and maybe break it down how to do it. I can attempt to answer these questions for my homework
    \
    Homework2-4.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/homework2-4-docx-10337877 "Homework2-4.docx")
    \
    Homework2data.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/homework2data-xlsx-10337879 "Homework2data.xlsx")