Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] assg

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering assg.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] A- Discussion Replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You must then post 2 replies of at least 500 words each

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You must then post 2 replies of at least 500 words each

  • [Solved] Leadership

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx – Screenshot_20250624_091821_CanvasStudent.jpg – Screenshot_20250624_091919_CanvasStudent.jpg – Screenshot_20250624_091850_CanvasStudent.jpg – Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg **## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx** 4 **Commitment t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx

    – Screenshot_20250624_091821_CanvasStudent.jpg
    – Screenshot_20250624_091919_CanvasStudent.jpg
    – Screenshot_20250624_091850_CanvasStudent.jpg
    – Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg

    **## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx**

    4

    **Commitment to Self-Improvement**

    **Introduction**

    Explain in your own words, to your readers, a little about yourself personally and professionally. For example, you can discuss the type of industry where you are employed and how you feel about that industry. Another example could be based on your training and education you have had throughout your career. You should have at least one paragraph and no more than two paragraphs of content. There are no sources in this introduction area; however,
    **in the remaining of the assignment (i.e., Areas of Excellence, Areas of Development, Conclusion)**, you are required to demonstrate quality writing and must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more separate current scholarly peer-reviewed articles (past 5 to 7 years) to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts. Please note that short choppy sentences will not count as an academic sentence.

    **Areas of Excellence**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining what leadership means with supporting evidence. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two strengths you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead into the next level heading of Strength One and Strength Two.

    **Instructions for the following two-level headings below:**

    Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **separate** **current scholarly articles** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here and place your example to how you use this in a professional setting.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure..

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why communication is needed in an organization with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess as
    an effective communicator.Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why an individual needs to have skills with the use of technology with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess regarding
    technology skills. Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your technological sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Areas of Development**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved leadership skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved communication skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess**
    **as a communicator.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding your communication skills. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved technological skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess regarding**
    **technology skills.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding the use of technology. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your technology sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Conclusion**

    In this paragraph, explain why you feel this assignment could help you as you move forward in your program and career. All assignments in the course should demonstrate quality writing.
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more current scholarly sources to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph.** Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **References**
    **Enter all References here and keep the double-spacing format. Make sure to DELETE my instructions. All references must have either a DOI or the URL, so faculty can go to the exact source to check the validity of the article.**

    **Screenshot_20250624_091821_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091821-canvasstudent-jpg-10332065)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091919_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091919-canvasstudent-jpg-10332067)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091850_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091850-canvasstudent-jpg-10332069)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091837-canvasstudent-jpg-10332071)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091837-canvasstudent-jpg-10332071)

    **## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx**

    4

    **Commitment to Self-Improvement**

    **Introduction**

    Explain in your own words, to your readers, a little about yourself personally and professionally. For example, you can discuss the type of industry where you are employed and how you feel about that industry. Another example could be based on your training and education you have had throughout your career. You should have at least one paragraph and no more than two paragraphs of content. There are no sources in this introduction area; however,
    **in the remaining of the assignment (i.e., Areas of Excellence, Areas of Development, Conclusion)**, you are required to demonstrate quality writing and must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more separate current scholarly peer-reviewed articles (past 5 to 7 years) to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts. Please note that short choppy sentences will not count as an academic sentence.

    **Areas of Excellence**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining what leadership means with supporting evidence. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two strengths you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead into the next level heading of Strength One and Strength Two.

    **Instructions for the following two-level headings below:**

    Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **separate** **current scholarly articles** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here and place your example to how you use this in a professional setting.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure..

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why communication is needed in an organization with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess as
    an effective communicator.Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why an individual needs to have skills with the use of technology with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess regarding
    technology skills. Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your technological sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Areas of Development**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved leadership skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved communication skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess**
    **as a communicator.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding your communication skills. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved technological skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess regarding**
    **technology skills.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding the use of technology. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your technology sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Conclusion**

    In this paragraph, explain why you feel this assignment could help you as you move forward in your program and career. All assignments in the course should demonstrate quality writing.
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more current scholarly sources to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph.** Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **References**
    **Enter all References here and keep the double-spacing format. Make sure to DELETE my instructions. All references must have either a DOI or the URL, so faculty can go to the exact source to check the validity of the article.**

    **Screenshot_20250624_091821_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091821-canvasstudent-jpg-10332065)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091919_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091919-canvasstudent-jpg-10332067)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091850_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091850-canvasstudent-jpg-10332069)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091837-canvasstudent-jpg-10332071)

    **## Assignmentonemandetorytemplate.docx**

    4

    **Commitment to Self-Improvement**

    **Introduction**

    Explain in your own words, to your readers, a little about yourself personally and professionally. For example, you can discuss the type of industry where you are employed and how you feel about that industry. Another example could be based on your training and education you have had throughout your career. You should have at least one paragraph and no more than two paragraphs of content. There are no sources in this introduction area; however,
    **in the remaining of the assignment (i.e., Areas of Excellence, Areas of Development, Conclusion)**, you are required to demonstrate quality writing and must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more separate current scholarly peer-reviewed articles (past 5 to 7 years) to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts. Please note that short choppy sentences will not count as an academic sentence.

    **Areas of Excellence**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining what leadership means with supporting evidence. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two strengths you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead into the next level heading of Strength One and Strength Two.

    **Instructions for the following two-level headings below:**

    Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **separate** **current scholarly articles** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here and place your example to how you use this in a professional setting.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure..

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why communication is needed in an organization with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess as
    an effective communicator.Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why an individual needs to have skills with the use of technology with supporting evidence. Then you will mention the two strengths you possess regarding
    technology skills. Highlight your strengths as Areas of Excellence and provide a detailed example of how you have utilized these two strengths in a professional setting. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate strengths** in separate sections (i.e., Strength One, Strength Two), each of your technological sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences. Do not end a paragraph with a source as you need to summarize any source you find by closing out each paragraph with your thoughts.

    **Strength One.** Start your first strength here.

    **Strength Two.** Start your second strength here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Areas of Development**

    **_Leadership_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved leadership skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your leadership sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of leadership. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Communication_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved communication skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess**
    **as a communicator.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding your communication skills. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your communication sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of communication. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure. Please remember to be detailed as this is a doctoral level submission and represents you as a leader.

    **_Technology_**

    You will start this paragraph by explaining why it is important to have improved technological skills. You must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least two supporting scholarly articles. You will then close out the paragraph by mentioning the two weaknesses you possess
    as a leader. This will then lead to the next level heading of Development One and Development Two.

    **In your first sentence, you will start this section by first mentioning two weaknesses you possess regarding**
    **technology skills.** Highlight your weaknesses as Areas of Development and provide a detailed example of how you plan to show growth in the future regarding the use of technology. You will support your narrative with
    **four** **current scholarly sources** in order to synthesize and validate your claims (i.e., supporting your content). Since you will discuss your
    **two separate weaknesses** in separate sections (i.e., Development One, Development Two), each of your technology sections will need two separate sources, totaling four current scholarly sources for this section of technology. These current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years) will be from peer reviewed journals only, no books or trade reports. All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.

    **Development One.** Start your first development here.

    **Development Two.** Start your second development here.

    Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **Conclusion**

    In this paragraph, explain why you feel this assignment could help you as you move forward in your program and career. All assignments in the course should demonstrate quality writing.
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences and two or more current scholarly sources to synthesize each topic/issue within the paragraph.** Remove the directions when creating your section and respond in sentence structure.

    **References**
    **Enter all References here and keep the double-spacing format. Make sure to DELETE my instructions. All references must have either a DOI or the URL, so faculty can go to the exact source to check the validity of the article.**

    **Screenshot_20250624_091821_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091821-canvasstudent-jpg-10332065)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091919_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091919-canvasstudent-jpg-10332067)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091850_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091850-canvasstudent-jpg-10332069)

    **Screenshot_20250624_091837_CanvasStudent.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250624-091837-canvasstudent-jpg-10332071)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5

  • [Solved] GENE2500000

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://juicyecumenism.com/2014/08/04/symposium-dylan-pahman-defining-social-justice/ Ryken, Philip Graham. _Written in Stone: The Ten Commandments and Today’s Moral Crisis_. P&R Publishing, 2010. (ISBN: 978-1596382060) **Read** pages 11-25 and 41-55 of Philip Ryken, _Written in Stone_, chapter 1 "W…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://juicyecumenism.com/2014/08/04/symposium-dylan-pahman-defining-social-justice/
    Ryken, Philip Graham. _Written in Stone: The Ten Commandments and Today’s Moral Crisis_. P&R Publishing, 2010. (ISBN: 978-1596382060)
    **Read** pages 11-25 and 41-55 of Philip Ryken, _Written in Stone_, chapter 1 "Written in Stone" and chapter 3, “Interpreting God’s Law
    \
    WEEK1GENE250.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week1gene250-docx "WEEK1GENE250.docx")

  • [Solved] 6202-5A

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 6202-5A.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week 5 Discussion Response- Managing People and Promoting Collab

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx – ## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx **## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx** **Managing People and Promoting Collab** **Week 5 Learning Resources** **Understanding Coaching** Much…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx

    – ## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx

    **## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People and Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Learning Resources**

    **Understanding Coaching**

    Much of the manager’s role consists of achieving organizational results through other people. To achieve this goal, managers must be skilled coaches. Through these resources, you will explore the mindset and fundamental skills of effective coaching.

    · Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    [_What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906?wrap=1) [Download What is coaching? How to be an effective coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906/download?download_frd=1). MindTools. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm
    MindTools. (n.d.). What is Coaching? https://www.mindtools.com/a1plnmq/what-is-coaching. Reprinted by permission of MindTools via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2023.

    · Grote, D. (2011).
    [Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895?wrap=1) [Download Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895/download?download_frd=1). In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.
    Grote, D. (2011).
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_. Harvard Business Press. Licensed 2021.

    · Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    [Most managers don’t know how to coach people. But they can learn](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FH04HTO-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Coaching For Performance**

    Several management gurus have pointed out that managers should “look in the mirror” to explore their own behaviors when employees are not performing as they should. Using these resources, you will explore specific skills and techniques managers use to help employees achieve improved performance.

    · Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    [Becoming a better coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7447BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2006).
    [Closing gaps and improving performance: The basics of coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7416BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–19). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Conducting a feedback session](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Developing an action plan](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 43–53). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Geisler, J. (2020).
    [What leaders should know before having tough conversations about performanceLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgea&AN=edsgcl.613864826&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Healthcare Financial Management_,
    _74_(1), 50–51.

    · Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    [The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FR1906G-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11. http://hbr.org

    · PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    [_A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_ Links to an external site.](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/).
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **Important Documents and Resources**

    ·
    **Document:** [Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905?wrap=1) [Download Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    **Document:** [Week 5 Assignment Template: Coaching Conversation Preparation and Strategy (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724894?wrap=1)

    **## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People & Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Discussion Response**

    **Colleague 1**

    Alexis Ruban

    At a SaaS start-up in my second year, I got lucky and worked directly under our CTO, who placed on himself the image of a coach Ibarra and Scoular (2019) portrayed as a leader. She never introduced a meeting with a prescription; she always started with broad questions: a re-framing of problems as experiments: What is a minimal-viable test that could prove your hypothesis during this sprint?” Such prompts made me develop assumptions, locate data gaps, and offer scaled-down and non-permanent pilots. She supplemented that question with what Grote (2011) terms micro-coaching, which teaches things in a burst during a quick learning session completed in real-time between reviews and daily stand-ups. In case I had difficulties with an API integration, she would halt the review, open a quick diagram on her tablet, and say to me: Refactor one of the endpoints when the idea is still vivid. This on-the-spot, practical feedback made my learning curve much steeper than any other workshop could have. Within half a year, her coaching helped me to revamp our customer-onboarding journey, resulting in a 40 percent decrease in time-to-activation and a 12 percent decrease in churn. The experience has made me utterly convinced that great coaches foster independence by stimulating curiosity and providing just-in-time scaffolding as opposed to regular lectures.

    In utter contrast, I had an earlier internship where I was led by a technical lead whose style was very waterfall in the era that he supported. It did not take long before weekly check-ins turned into a post-mortem checking, counting missed deadlines, and naming sources. They lacked a collective vision of a desired state in the future, there were no developmental resources, and there was surely no room for experimentation. According to Harvard Business School Press (2006), performance coaching turns into a performance-eating mess the moment managers become obsessed with the assessment process more than with the growth; my case study is a textbook example. The meeting focused on lagging indicators: how many bugs we had to fix and how many hours we had to work, so I finished each meeting feeling more anxious and less sure about a path to victory. Moreover, unsurprisingly, team velocity stopped, and innovation came out only in secretive side projects.

    The comparison between the two experiences sums up the dynamics of successful versus unsuccessful coaching. The CTO worked in an inquiry-based position: inquiry came first, and then teaching ensued, resulting in psychological safety and belonging. The intern lead has become judgment-first, not guided by evaluation and elimination of initiative. The distinction also upholds the claim by Grote (2011) that regular and small coaching is better than the annually downloaded coaching model, and that the view proposed by Harvard Business School Press (2006) is developed instead of downloading.

    From these contrasts, I distill three enduring principles for my coaching practice:

    1. Ownership blossoms through inquiry before advice. Open questions invite self-diagnosis and foster commitment (Ibarra & Scoular, 2019).

    2. Micro-coaching beats marathon feedback sessions. Timely, situational guidance turns learning moments into muscle memory (Grote, 2011).

    3. Innovation thrives when feedback is developmental, not merely evaluative. Centering on growth rather than fault-finding sustains creative risk-taking (Harvard Business School Press, 2006).

    These lessons now guide how I mentor junior engineers: I begin with questions, embed teaching into daily workflows, and frame feedback as a springboard for experimentation rather than a judgment on past performance.

    **References**

    Grote, D. (2011).
    _Providing day-to-day coaching_. In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.

    Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    _Becoming a better coach_. In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_ (pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    _The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Colleague 2**

    Lauren Adkins

    One of my earliest bosses in the marketing field was a regional director whose behavior matched what can be described as a product of Emerald Works Limited (n.d.), as the so-called growth-centered coach. Each one-to-one began with a question that helped her connect the short-sequenced project I was working on with some longer-term competencies I wanted to develop. When I had the choke in the national rebrand, she did not provide me with answers but rather facilitated the process of going through PERLA Coaching & Consulting's (n.d.) conversation checklist that included clarifying the challenge, co-brainstorming options, and committing to such further steps. The building of such a structure made me feel free to restart the campaign and motivated me to consult on cross-functional meetings. Her approach to precise questions and instant responses can be likened to the instructions for a feedback session (Harvard Business Review Press, 2014).

    In comparison, a former manager was a clear example of the critique by Milner and Milner (2018) that most managers tend to explain rather than coach. During weekly status calls, he took up all the air flow, gave short, terse orders, and adjourned the meetings without a definite course of action. When a digital ad set was performing below expectations, he would re-communicate targets, providing no discussion on developing skills. Moreover, had he taken a moment to unearth root causes or collaboratively developed an improvement roadmap, as advised by Harvard Business Review Press (2014), our team members would have been able to learn quicker, and they would not have felt so demoralized. Three takeaways shape my coaching philosophy:

    1.
    **Use questions to unlock autonomy.** Actual curiosity brings out the truth that an order can never bring out.

    2.
    **Anchor feedback in a shared checklist.** An obvious form maintains sessions on topic and is instructive.

    3.
    **Close with a co-authored action plan.** Once a check mark is done on both ends, obligations go through the roof.

    **References**

    Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    _What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_. MindTools.
    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htmLinks to an external site.](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm)

    Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    _Conducting a feedback session_. In
    _Giving Effective Feedback_ (pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    _Most managers do not know how to coach people. But they can learn_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [https://hbr.orgLinks to an external site.](https://hbr.org/)

    PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    _A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_.
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People & Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Discussion Response**

    **Colleague 1**

    Alexis Ruban

    At a SaaS start-up in my second year, I got lucky and worked directly under our CTO, who placed on himself the image of a coach Ibarra and Scoular (2019) portrayed as a leader. She never introduced a meeting with a prescription; she always started with broad questions: a re-framing of problems as experiments: What is a minimal-viable test that could prove your hypothesis during this sprint?” Such prompts made me develop assumptions, locate data gaps, and offer scaled-down and non-permanent pilots. She supplemented that question with what Grote (2011) terms micro-coaching, which teaches things in a burst during a quick learning session completed in real-time between reviews and daily stand-ups. In case I had difficulties with an API integration, she would halt the review, open a quick diagram on her tablet, and say to me: Refactor one of the endpoints when the idea is still vivid. This on-the-spot, practical feedback made my learning curve much steeper than any other workshop could have. Within half a year, her coaching helped me to revamp our customer-onboarding journey, resulting in a 40 percent decrease in time-to-activation and a 12 percent decrease in churn. The experience has made me utterly convinced that great coaches foster independence by stimulating curiosity and providing just-in-time scaffolding as opposed to regular lectures.

    In utter contrast, I had an earlier internship where I was led by a technical lead whose style was very waterfall in the era that he supported. It did not take long before weekly check-ins turned into a post-mortem checking, counting missed deadlines, and naming sources. They lacked a collective vision of a desired state in the future, there were no developmental resources, and there was surely no room for experimentation. According to Harvard Business School Press (2006), performance coaching turns into a performance-eating mess the moment managers become obsessed with the assessment process more than with the growth; my case study is a textbook example. The meeting focused on lagging indicators: how many bugs we had to fix and how many hours we had to work, so I finished each meeting feeling more anxious and less sure about a path to victory. Moreover, unsurprisingly, team velocity stopped, and innovation came out only in secretive side projects.

    The comparison between the two experiences sums up the dynamics of successful versus unsuccessful coaching. The CTO worked in an inquiry-based position: inquiry came first, and then teaching ensued, resulting in psychological safety and belonging. The intern lead has become judgment-first, not guided by evaluation and elimination of initiative. The distinction also upholds the claim by Grote (2011) that regular and small coaching is better than the annually downloaded coaching model, and that the view proposed by Harvard Business School Press (2006) is developed instead of downloading.

    From these contrasts, I distill three enduring principles for my coaching practice:

    1. Ownership blossoms through inquiry before advice. Open questions invite self-diagnosis and foster commitment (Ibarra & Scoular, 2019).

    2. Micro-coaching beats marathon feedback sessions. Timely, situational guidance turns learning moments into muscle memory (Grote, 2011).

    3. Innovation thrives when feedback is developmental, not merely evaluative. Centering on growth rather than fault-finding sustains creative risk-taking (Harvard Business School Press, 2006).

    These lessons now guide how I mentor junior engineers: I begin with questions, embed teaching into daily workflows, and frame feedback as a springboard for experimentation rather than a judgment on past performance.

    **References**

    Grote, D. (2011).
    _Providing day-to-day coaching_. In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.

    Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    _Becoming a better coach_. In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_ (pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    _The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Colleague 2**

    Lauren Adkins

    One of my earliest bosses in the marketing field was a regional director whose behavior matched what can be described as a product of Emerald Works Limited (n.d.), as the so-called growth-centered coach. Each one-to-one began with a question that helped her connect the short-sequenced project I was working on with some longer-term competencies I wanted to develop. When I had the choke in the national rebrand, she did not provide me with answers but rather facilitated the process of going through PERLA Coaching & Consulting's (n.d.) conversation checklist that included clarifying the challenge, co-brainstorming options, and committing to such further steps. The building of such a structure made me feel free to restart the campaign and motivated me to consult on cross-functional meetings. Her approach to precise questions and instant responses can be likened to the instructions for a feedback session (Harvard Business Review Press, 2014).

    In comparison, a former manager was a clear example of the critique by Milner and Milner (2018) that most managers tend to explain rather than coach. During weekly status calls, he took up all the air flow, gave short, terse orders, and adjourned the meetings without a definite course of action. When a digital ad set was performing below expectations, he would re-communicate targets, providing no discussion on developing skills. Moreover, had he taken a moment to unearth root causes or collaboratively developed an improvement roadmap, as advised by Harvard Business Review Press (2014), our team members would have been able to learn quicker, and they would not have felt so demoralized. Three takeaways shape my coaching philosophy:

    1.
    **Use questions to unlock autonomy.** Actual curiosity brings out the truth that an order can never bring out.

    2.
    **Anchor feedback in a shared checklist.** An obvious form maintains sessions on topic and is instructive.

    3.
    **Close with a co-authored action plan.** Once a check mark is done on both ends, obligations go through the roof.

    **References**

    Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    _What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_. MindTools.
    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htmLinks to an external site.](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm)

    Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    _Conducting a feedback session_. In
    _Giving Effective Feedback_ (pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    _Most managers do not know how to coach people. But they can learn_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [https://hbr.orgLinks to an external site.](https://hbr.org/)

    PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    _A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_.
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People and Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Learning Resources**

    **Understanding Coaching**

    Much of the manager’s role consists of achieving organizational results through other people. To achieve this goal, managers must be skilled coaches. Through these resources, you will explore the mindset and fundamental skills of effective coaching.

    · Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    [_What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906?wrap=1) [Download What is coaching? How to be an effective coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906/download?download_frd=1). MindTools. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm
    MindTools. (n.d.). What is Coaching? https://www.mindtools.com/a1plnmq/what-is-coaching. Reprinted by permission of MindTools via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2023.

    · Grote, D. (2011).
    [Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895?wrap=1) [Download Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895/download?download_frd=1). In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.
    Grote, D. (2011).
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_. Harvard Business Press. Licensed 2021.

    · Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    [Most managers don’t know how to coach people. But they can learn](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FH04HTO-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Coaching For Performance**

    Several management gurus have pointed out that managers should “look in the mirror” to explore their own behaviors when employees are not performing as they should. Using these resources, you will explore specific skills and techniques managers use to help employees achieve improved performance.

    · Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    [Becoming a better coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7447BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2006).
    [Closing gaps and improving performance: The basics of coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7416BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–19). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Conducting a feedback session](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Developing an action plan](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 43–53). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Geisler, J. (2020).
    [What leaders should know before having tough conversations about performanceLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgea&AN=edsgcl.613864826&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Healthcare Financial Management_,
    _74_(1), 50–51.

    · Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    [The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FR1906G-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11. http://hbr.org

    · PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    [_A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_ Links to an external site.](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/).
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **Important Documents and Resources**

    ·
    **Document:** [Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905?wrap=1) [Download Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    **Document:** [Week 5 Assignment Template: Coaching Conversation Preparation and Strategy (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724894?wrap=1)

    **## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People & Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Discussion Response**

    **Colleague 1**

    Alexis Ruban

    At a SaaS start-up in my second year, I got lucky and worked directly under our CTO, who placed on himself the image of a coach Ibarra and Scoular (2019) portrayed as a leader. She never introduced a meeting with a prescription; she always started with broad questions: a re-framing of problems as experiments: What is a minimal-viable test that could prove your hypothesis during this sprint?” Such prompts made me develop assumptions, locate data gaps, and offer scaled-down and non-permanent pilots. She supplemented that question with what Grote (2011) terms micro-coaching, which teaches things in a burst during a quick learning session completed in real-time between reviews and daily stand-ups. In case I had difficulties with an API integration, she would halt the review, open a quick diagram on her tablet, and say to me: Refactor one of the endpoints when the idea is still vivid. This on-the-spot, practical feedback made my learning curve much steeper than any other workshop could have. Within half a year, her coaching helped me to revamp our customer-onboarding journey, resulting in a 40 percent decrease in time-to-activation and a 12 percent decrease in churn. The experience has made me utterly convinced that great coaches foster independence by stimulating curiosity and providing just-in-time scaffolding as opposed to regular lectures.

    In utter contrast, I had an earlier internship where I was led by a technical lead whose style was very waterfall in the era that he supported. It did not take long before weekly check-ins turned into a post-mortem checking, counting missed deadlines, and naming sources. They lacked a collective vision of a desired state in the future, there were no developmental resources, and there was surely no room for experimentation. According to Harvard Business School Press (2006), performance coaching turns into a performance-eating mess the moment managers become obsessed with the assessment process more than with the growth; my case study is a textbook example. The meeting focused on lagging indicators: how many bugs we had to fix and how many hours we had to work, so I finished each meeting feeling more anxious and less sure about a path to victory. Moreover, unsurprisingly, team velocity stopped, and innovation came out only in secretive side projects.

    The comparison between the two experiences sums up the dynamics of successful versus unsuccessful coaching. The CTO worked in an inquiry-based position: inquiry came first, and then teaching ensued, resulting in psychological safety and belonging. The intern lead has become judgment-first, not guided by evaluation and elimination of initiative. The distinction also upholds the claim by Grote (2011) that regular and small coaching is better than the annually downloaded coaching model, and that the view proposed by Harvard Business School Press (2006) is developed instead of downloading.

    From these contrasts, I distill three enduring principles for my coaching practice:

    1. Ownership blossoms through inquiry before advice. Open questions invite self-diagnosis and foster commitment (Ibarra & Scoular, 2019).

    2. Micro-coaching beats marathon feedback sessions. Timely, situational guidance turns learning moments into muscle memory (Grote, 2011).

    3. Innovation thrives when feedback is developmental, not merely evaluative. Centering on growth rather than fault-finding sustains creative risk-taking (Harvard Business School Press, 2006).

    These lessons now guide how I mentor junior engineers: I begin with questions, embed teaching into daily workflows, and frame feedback as a springboard for experimentation rather than a judgment on past performance.

    **References**

    Grote, D. (2011).
    _Providing day-to-day coaching_. In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.

    Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    _Becoming a better coach_. In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_ (pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    _The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Colleague 2**

    Lauren Adkins

    One of my earliest bosses in the marketing field was a regional director whose behavior matched what can be described as a product of Emerald Works Limited (n.d.), as the so-called growth-centered coach. Each one-to-one began with a question that helped her connect the short-sequenced project I was working on with some longer-term competencies I wanted to develop. When I had the choke in the national rebrand, she did not provide me with answers but rather facilitated the process of going through PERLA Coaching & Consulting's (n.d.) conversation checklist that included clarifying the challenge, co-brainstorming options, and committing to such further steps. The building of such a structure made me feel free to restart the campaign and motivated me to consult on cross-functional meetings. Her approach to precise questions and instant responses can be likened to the instructions for a feedback session (Harvard Business Review Press, 2014).

    In comparison, a former manager was a clear example of the critique by Milner and Milner (2018) that most managers tend to explain rather than coach. During weekly status calls, he took up all the air flow, gave short, terse orders, and adjourned the meetings without a definite course of action. When a digital ad set was performing below expectations, he would re-communicate targets, providing no discussion on developing skills. Moreover, had he taken a moment to unearth root causes or collaboratively developed an improvement roadmap, as advised by Harvard Business Review Press (2014), our team members would have been able to learn quicker, and they would not have felt so demoralized. Three takeaways shape my coaching philosophy:

    1.
    **Use questions to unlock autonomy.** Actual curiosity brings out the truth that an order can never bring out.

    2.
    **Anchor feedback in a shared checklist.** An obvious form maintains sessions on topic and is instructive.

    3.
    **Close with a co-authored action plan.** Once a check mark is done on both ends, obligations go through the roof.

    **References**

    Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    _What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_. MindTools.
    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htmLinks to an external site.](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm)

    Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    _Conducting a feedback session_. In
    _Giving Effective Feedback_ (pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    _Most managers do not know how to coach people. But they can learn_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [https://hbr.orgLinks to an external site.](https://hbr.org/)

    PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    _A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_.
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **## Week5LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People and Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Learning Resources**

    **Understanding Coaching**

    Much of the manager’s role consists of achieving organizational results through other people. To achieve this goal, managers must be skilled coaches. Through these resources, you will explore the mindset and fundamental skills of effective coaching.

    · Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    [_What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906?wrap=1) [Download What is coaching? How to be an effective coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724906/download?download_frd=1). MindTools. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm
    MindTools. (n.d.). What is Coaching? https://www.mindtools.com/a1plnmq/what-is-coaching. Reprinted by permission of MindTools via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2023.

    · Grote, D. (2011).
    [Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895?wrap=1) [Download Providing day-to-day coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724895/download?download_frd=1). In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.
    Grote, D. (2011).
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_. Harvard Business Press. Licensed 2021.

    · Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    [Most managers don’t know how to coach people. But they can learn](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FH04HTO-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Coaching For Performance**

    Several management gurus have pointed out that managers should “look in the mirror” to explore their own behaviors when employees are not performing as they should. Using these resources, you will explore specific skills and techniques managers use to help employees achieve improved performance.

    · Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    [Becoming a better coach](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7447BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2006).
    [Closing gaps and improving performance: The basics of coaching](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F7416BC-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_(pp. 1–19). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Conducting a feedback session](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    [Developing an action plan](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2F13999-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text). In
    _Giving effective feedback_(pp. 43–53). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    · Geisler, J. (2020).
    [What leaders should know before having tough conversations about performanceLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgea&AN=edsgcl.613864826&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Healthcare Financial Management_,
    _74_(1), 50–51.

    · Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    [The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/external_tools/retrieve?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.hbsp.harvard.edu%2Flti%2Flinks%2FR1906G-PDF-ENG%2Frich-text).
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11. http://hbr.org

    · PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    [_A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_ Links to an external site.](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/).
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    **Important Documents and Resources**

    ·
    **Document:** [Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905?wrap=1) [Download Developing Individuals: Coaching for Performance Simulation Preparation (PDF)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724905/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    **Document:** [Week 5 Assignment Template: Coaching Conversation Preparation and Strategy (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724894?wrap=1)

    **## Week5DiscussionResponse-ManagingPeoplePromotingCollab.docx**

    **Managing People & Promoting Collab**

    **Week 5 Discussion Response**

    **Colleague 1**

    Alexis Ruban

    At a SaaS start-up in my second year, I got lucky and worked directly under our CTO, who placed on himself the image of a coach Ibarra and Scoular (2019) portrayed as a leader. She never introduced a meeting with a prescription; she always started with broad questions: a re-framing of problems as experiments: What is a minimal-viable test that could prove your hypothesis during this sprint?” Such prompts made me develop assumptions, locate data gaps, and offer scaled-down and non-permanent pilots. She supplemented that question with what Grote (2011) terms micro-coaching, which teaches things in a burst during a quick learning session completed in real-time between reviews and daily stand-ups. In case I had difficulties with an API integration, she would halt the review, open a quick diagram on her tablet, and say to me: Refactor one of the endpoints when the idea is still vivid. This on-the-spot, practical feedback made my learning curve much steeper than any other workshop could have. Within half a year, her coaching helped me to revamp our customer-onboarding journey, resulting in a 40 percent decrease in time-to-activation and a 12 percent decrease in churn. The experience has made me utterly convinced that great coaches foster independence by stimulating curiosity and providing just-in-time scaffolding as opposed to regular lectures.

    In utter contrast, I had an earlier internship where I was led by a technical lead whose style was very waterfall in the era that he supported. It did not take long before weekly check-ins turned into a post-mortem checking, counting missed deadlines, and naming sources. They lacked a collective vision of a desired state in the future, there were no developmental resources, and there was surely no room for experimentation. According to Harvard Business School Press (2006), performance coaching turns into a performance-eating mess the moment managers become obsessed with the assessment process more than with the growth; my case study is a textbook example. The meeting focused on lagging indicators: how many bugs we had to fix and how many hours we had to work, so I finished each meeting feeling more anxious and less sure about a path to victory. Moreover, unsurprisingly, team velocity stopped, and innovation came out only in secretive side projects.

    The comparison between the two experiences sums up the dynamics of successful versus unsuccessful coaching. The CTO worked in an inquiry-based position: inquiry came first, and then teaching ensued, resulting in psychological safety and belonging. The intern lead has become judgment-first, not guided by evaluation and elimination of initiative. The distinction also upholds the claim by Grote (2011) that regular and small coaching is better than the annually downloaded coaching model, and that the view proposed by Harvard Business School Press (2006) is developed instead of downloading.

    From these contrasts, I distill three enduring principles for my coaching practice:

    1. Ownership blossoms through inquiry before advice. Open questions invite self-diagnosis and foster commitment (Ibarra & Scoular, 2019).

    2. Micro-coaching beats marathon feedback sessions. Timely, situational guidance turns learning moments into muscle memory (Grote, 2011).

    3. Innovation thrives when feedback is developmental, not merely evaluative. Centering on growth rather than fault-finding sustains creative risk-taking (Harvard Business School Press, 2006).

    These lessons now guide how I mentor junior engineers: I begin with questions, embed teaching into daily workflows, and frame feedback as a springboard for experimentation rather than a judgment on past performance.

    **References**

    Grote, D. (2011).
    _Providing day-to-day coaching_. In
    _How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right_ (pp. 71–88). Harvard Business Review Press.

    Harvard Business School Press. (2006).
    _Becoming a better coach_. In
    _Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees_ (pp. 1–14). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019, October 31).
    _The leader as coach: How to unleash innovation, energy, and commitment_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–11.
    [http://hbr.org](http://hbr.org/)

    **Colleague 2**

    Lauren Adkins

    One of my earliest bosses in the marketing field was a regional director whose behavior matched what can be described as a product of Emerald Works Limited (n.d.), as the so-called growth-centered coach. Each one-to-one began with a question that helped her connect the short-sequenced project I was working on with some longer-term competencies I wanted to develop. When I had the choke in the national rebrand, she did not provide me with answers but rather facilitated the process of going through PERLA Coaching & Consulting's (n.d.) conversation checklist that included clarifying the challenge, co-brainstorming options, and committing to such further steps. The building of such a structure made me feel free to restart the campaign and motivated me to consult on cross-functional meetings. Her approach to precise questions and instant responses can be likened to the instructions for a feedback session (Harvard Business Review Press, 2014).

    In comparison, a former manager was a clear example of the critique by Milner and Milner (2018) that most managers tend to explain rather than coach. During weekly status calls, he took up all the air flow, gave short, terse orders, and adjourned the meetings without a definite course of action. When a digital ad set was performing below expectations, he would re-communicate targets, providing no discussion on developing skills. Moreover, had he taken a moment to unearth root causes or collaboratively developed an improvement roadmap, as advised by Harvard Business Review Press (2014), our team members would have been able to learn quicker, and they would not have felt so demoralized. Three takeaways shape my coaching philosophy:

    1.
    **Use questions to unlock autonomy.** Actual curiosity brings out the truth that an order can never bring out.

    2.
    **Anchor feedback in a shared checklist.** An obvious form maintains sessions on topic and is instructive.

    3.
    **Close with a co-authored action plan.** Once a check mark is done on both ends, obligations go through the roof.

    **References**

    Emerald Works Limited. (n.d.).
    _What is coaching? How to be an effective coach_. MindTools.
    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htmLinks to an external site.](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_15.htm)

    Harvard Business Review Press. (2014).
    _Conducting a feedback session_. In
    _Giving Effective Feedback_ (pp. 25–42). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Milner, J., & Milner, T. (2018, August 14).
    _Most managers do not know how to coach people. But they can learn_.
    _Harvard Business Review Digital Articles_, 2–5.
    [https://hbr.orgLinks to an external site.](https://hbr.org/)

    PERLA Coaching & Consulting. (n.d.).
    _A coaching conversation checklist for smart managers_.
    [https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/](https://www.perlacoaching.com/coaching-conversation-checklist-for-smart-managers/)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 6530-5A

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 6530-5A.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Capstone

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will create a final report video presentation on your data analysis project in the form of a PowerPoint document and a 3–5 minute video in which you present the information in your PowerPoint slides

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will create a final report video presentation on your data analysis project in the form of a PowerPoint document and a 3–5 minute video in which you present the information in your PowerPoint slides

  • [Solved] correlation vs causation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **First:** After reviewing the learning resources this week, consider the difference between correlation and causation. How would you describe these two terms to a fellow coworker? Why is it misleading to argue that correlational data demonstrates a cause-effect relationship? **Next:** Locate an art…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **First:** After reviewing the learning resources this week, consider the difference between correlation and causation. How would you describe these two terms to a fellow coworker? Why is it misleading to argue that correlational data demonstrates a cause-effect relationship?
    **Next:** Locate an article that demonstrates either correlation or causation. Describe, the methodology that was used in the study and the results that were obtained. What conclusions can be stated from the data? If your study used correlation, what is the danger of arguing that one variable caused the other? If your study used causation, what are the limitations of applying a causal relationship identified in research to a real-world setting?
    **Discussion Board Instructions**
    **Purpose**
    Weekly discussions are designed to promote dialogue and learning between faculty and students, and students and the peers. They are designed to stimulate the dialogue which would normally take place in a traditional classroom setting. Participation in the discussion board is an opportunity for each student to demonstrate knowledge of the course content.
    In each discussion, students will achieve the following objectives:
    – Demonstrate an understanding of each week’s concepts and content.
    – Integrate scholarly resources.
    – Engage in a meaningful dialogue with classmates and the professor.
    – Express opinions and evidence clearly and logically, in a professional manner.
    **Requirements**
    Discussions must be comprehensive, scholarly and follow APA guidelines.
    – Initial posts must be a minimum of 500 words and contain _at least_ 2 scholarly sources, one of which may be your textbook.
    **A note on sources**
    Only scholarly sources are acceptable in graduate-level discussion posts and must be properly cited according to APA 7th edition.
    – Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, .com websites, or blogs are not acceptable. When using internet sources, only reputable websites by government agencies (.gov) or respected organizations (.org) will be considered to be scholarly sources.

  • [Solved] Module 7 Reflection Paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe a time when you struggled to perform a task at work. What was the job task? Using the PDC-HS, what questions would you have responded to with a no? If you were your supervisor, what would you have changed in your environment in order to help you perform better? _Remember to review the Refle…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe a time when you struggled to perform a task at work. What was the job task? Using the PDC-HS, what questions would you have responded to with a no? If you were your supervisor, what would you have changed in your environment in order to help you perform better?
    _Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._
    _Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._