My Blog

Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] Weekly Clinical Experience 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    From the perspective of a nurse practitioner student doing their third week of clinical rotation at a gerontology primary care office: Describe your clinical experience for this week. – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    From the perspective of a nurse practitioner student doing their third week of clinical rotation at a gerontology primary care office: Describe your clinical experience for this week.
    – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
    – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    – Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
    – What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
    – Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.
    **Submission Instructions:**
    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
    – in paragraph form, no bullet points or numbering

  • [Solved] research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    itsdue on the 5 – ## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx – ## ResearchArticleComponentIdentificationAssignment-4201.docx – InfectionControlJournal2.pdf **## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx** RATING SYSTEM FOR THE LEVEL/HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE LEVEL I: Evidence from an integrated literature r…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    itsdue on the 5

    – ## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx

    – ## ResearchArticleComponentIdentificationAssignment-4201.docx

    – InfectionControlJournal2.pdf

    **## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx**

    RATING SYSTEM FOR THE LEVEL/HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE

    LEVEL I: Evidence from an integrated literature review, systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs), or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.

    · Review of research evidence related to a specific clinical question.

    · Critically analyzes and synthesizes findings from multiple random control trials.

    · Aim is to interpret and translate findings.

    LEVEL II: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designated RCT. (experimental)

    · Study subjects are randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group.

    · May be:

    · Blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Double-blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Non-blind: both subject and investigator know which treatment subject is receiving; used when it is felt that the knowledge of treatment is unimportant.

    LEVEL III: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization. (quasi-experimental)

    · Always includes manipulation of an independent variable

    · Lacks either random assignment or control group

    · Findings must be considered in light of threats to validity (particularly selection)

    LEVEL IV: Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies.

    · No manipulation of the independent variable.

    LEVEL V: Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies, correlational studies.

    LEVEL VI: Evidence from a single descriptive or qualitative study.

    · Explorative in nature, such as interviews, observations, or focus groups.

    · Starting point for studies of questions for which little research currently exists.

    · Sample sizes are usually small and study results are used to design stronger studies that are more objective and quantifiable.

    · Describing differences in variables between or among groups.

    · Describing relationships among variables. No attempt to understand causal relationship.

    LEVEL VII: Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees.

    QUALITY DEFINITIONS

    (Quality is based on Critical Appraisal)

    GOOD: A study meets all research design-specific criteria well

    FAIR: A study does not meet (or it is not clear that it meets) at least one design-specific criterion but has no known “fatal flaws”

    POOR: A study that has at least one design specific “fatal flaw: or an accumulation of lesser flaws.

    References

    Dearholt, S.L.; & Dang, D. (2012).
    _John Hopkins nursing-evidence based practice: model and guidelines (2nd ed.)._ John Hopkins University, School of Nursing: Sigma Theta Tau

    Fineout-Overholt, E and Melnyk, B.M. (2005).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice._ Philadephia:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    **## ResearchArticleComponentIdentificationAssignment-4201.docx**

    Research Study Component Identification Assignment

    Name: ____________________________________________________________________________

    ***Instructions:**

    1. Utilize the journal article provided, entitled:

    Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel by Salazar-Vargas et al

    [Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole-body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel – ScienceDirect](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655320300134?via%3Dihub)

    2. In the article, identify the following components (# 1-24, listed below) of the research process.  Highlight, underline or bracket,
    on the article, each component listed with the corresponding number from this worksheet.  If any component is missing, make a note next to the item on the worksheet.

    3. On the worksheet, add the
    specific page number/s (ie239, 426) where each component is found in the article.  Components may be in more than one place, so search for them.  If any components of the research process are missing, please note this on the sheet under the component, i.e. missing or N/A.

    4. Complete question #25.

    **Components:**

    1. Abstract —0.5pt

    2. Problem statement (what the problem was and why the study was needed) —2pt

    3. Purpose Statement/Purpose or aim of the study -1pt

    4. Theoretical or conceptual framework (if available) -0.5pt

    5. Review of literature (throughout the article)- 0.5pt

    6. Study design i.e. Descriptive, random control trial, quasi-experimental, case study, ethnography. What

    specific research study design was used in the article? –2pt

    7. Level of Evidence of the research study design: (no page# needed). See Level of Evidence sheet. -2pt

    8. Sample population– 0.5pt

    9. Sample size –0.5pt

    10. Inclusion Criteria of the participants (who is included in the study) -0.5pt

    11. Exclusion Criteria of participants (who is excluded in the study; this may be vague or assumed)—0.5pt

    12. Setting; Where did the study take place? 0.5pt

    13. Legal-ethical issues (IRB approval; Specific guidelines/policies followed): 0.5pt

    14. Independent and Dependent variables: (4 points)

    Independent variable/s: (Be specific; no page # needed):

    Dependent variable/s: (Be specific no page # needed):

    15. Data collection procedure/s (step by step or process of how data was collected) –2pt

    16. Measurement tools: 0.5pt

    17. Validity and reliability (this can be explained in many ways, i.e. validity of a tool or revision of a tool to

    increase reliability; training done.) –1

    18. Data analysis (methods/statistics used to analyze data) –1

    19. Results-findings; Share enough information/data to clearly state the results; be specific: 2pt

    20. Discussion –conclusions 1pt

    21. Limitations of the study i.e. small sample size, high dropout rate, one setting (if available) –0.5pt

    22. Implications for nursing practice from the findings (if available) i.e. how will this data be used? What

    education can student nurses/nurses provide patients/families/staff –1pt

    23. Suggestions for further study (if available) –1

    24. References –0.5

    25. Did the article have enough information to meet the criteria of a valid research article? Yes or No;

    Why or Why not? Please explain; MUST include strengths or weaknesses of the research article (4 pts)

    **InfectionControlJournal2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/infectioncontroljournal2-pdf)

    **InfectionControlJournal2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/infectioncontroljournal2-pdf)

    **## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx**

    RATING SYSTEM FOR THE LEVEL/HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE

    LEVEL I: Evidence from an integrated literature review, systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs), or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.

    · Review of research evidence related to a specific clinical question.

    · Critically analyzes and synthesizes findings from multiple random control trials.

    · Aim is to interpret and translate findings.

    LEVEL II: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designated RCT. (experimental)

    · Study subjects are randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group.

    · May be:

    · Blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Double-blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Non-blind: both subject and investigator know which treatment subject is receiving; used when it is felt that the knowledge of treatment is unimportant.

    LEVEL III: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization. (quasi-experimental)

    · Always includes manipulation of an independent variable

    · Lacks either random assignment or control group

    · Findings must be considered in light of threats to validity (particularly selection)

    LEVEL IV: Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies.

    · No manipulation of the independent variable.

    LEVEL V: Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies, correlational studies.

    LEVEL VI: Evidence from a single descriptive or qualitative study.

    · Explorative in nature, such as interviews, observations, or focus groups.

    · Starting point for studies of questions for which little research currently exists.

    · Sample sizes are usually small and study results are used to design stronger studies that are more objective and quantifiable.

    · Describing differences in variables between or among groups.

    · Describing relationships among variables. No attempt to understand causal relationship.

    LEVEL VII: Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees.

    QUALITY DEFINITIONS

    (Quality is based on Critical Appraisal)

    GOOD: A study meets all research design-specific criteria well

    FAIR: A study does not meet (or it is not clear that it meets) at least one design-specific criterion but has no known “fatal flaws”

    POOR: A study that has at least one design specific “fatal flaw: or an accumulation of lesser flaws.

    References

    Dearholt, S.L.; & Dang, D. (2012).
    _John Hopkins nursing-evidence based practice: model and guidelines (2nd ed.)._ John Hopkins University, School of Nursing: Sigma Theta Tau

    Fineout-Overholt, E and Melnyk, B.M. (2005).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice._ Philadephia:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    **## ResearchArticleComponentIdentificationAssignment-4201.docx**

    Research Study Component Identification Assignment

    Name: ____________________________________________________________________________

    ***Instructions:**

    1. Utilize the journal article provided, entitled:

    Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel by Salazar-Vargas et al

    [Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole-body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel – ScienceDirect](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655320300134?via%3Dihub)

    2. In the article, identify the following components (# 1-24, listed below) of the research process.  Highlight, underline or bracket,
    on the article, each component listed with the corresponding number from this worksheet.  If any component is missing, make a note next to the item on the worksheet.

    3. On the worksheet, add the
    specific page number/s (ie239, 426) where each component is found in the article.  Components may be in more than one place, so search for them.  If any components of the research process are missing, please note this on the sheet under the component, i.e. missing or N/A.

    4. Complete question #25.

    **Components:**

    1. Abstract —0.5pt

    2. Problem statement (what the problem was and why the study was needed) —2pt

    3. Purpose Statement/Purpose or aim of the study -1pt

    4. Theoretical or conceptual framework (if available) -0.5pt

    5. Review of literature (throughout the article)- 0.5pt

    6. Study design i.e. Descriptive, random control trial, quasi-experimental, case study, ethnography. What

    specific research study design was used in the article? –2pt

    7. Level of Evidence of the research study design: (no page# needed). See Level of Evidence sheet. -2pt

    8. Sample population– 0.5pt

    9. Sample size –0.5pt

    10. Inclusion Criteria of the participants (who is included in the study) -0.5pt

    11. Exclusion Criteria of participants (who is excluded in the study; this may be vague or assumed)—0.5pt

    12. Setting; Where did the study take place? 0.5pt

    13. Legal-ethical issues (IRB approval; Specific guidelines/policies followed): 0.5pt

    14. Independent and Dependent variables: (4 points)

    Independent variable/s: (Be specific; no page # needed):

    Dependent variable/s: (Be specific no page # needed):

    15. Data collection procedure/s (step by step or process of how data was collected) –2pt

    16. Measurement tools: 0.5pt

    17. Validity and reliability (this can be explained in many ways, i.e. validity of a tool or revision of a tool to

    increase reliability; training done.) –1

    18. Data analysis (methods/statistics used to analyze data) –1

    19. Results-findings; Share enough information/data to clearly state the results; be specific: 2pt

    20. Discussion –conclusions 1pt

    21. Limitations of the study i.e. small sample size, high dropout rate, one setting (if available) –0.5pt

    22. Implications for nursing practice from the findings (if available) i.e. how will this data be used? What

    education can student nurses/nurses provide patients/families/staff –1pt

    23. Suggestions for further study (if available) –1

    24. References –0.5

    25. Did the article have enough information to meet the criteria of a valid research article? Yes or No;

    Why or Why not? Please explain; MUST include strengths or weaknesses of the research article (4 pts)

    **InfectionControlJournal2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/infectioncontroljournal2-pdf)

    **## RatingsystemforLevelofEvidence112.docx**

    RATING SYSTEM FOR THE LEVEL/HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE

    LEVEL I: Evidence from an integrated literature review, systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs), or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.

    · Review of research evidence related to a specific clinical question.

    · Critically analyzes and synthesizes findings from multiple random control trials.

    · Aim is to interpret and translate findings.

    LEVEL II: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designated RCT. (experimental)

    · Study subjects are randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group.

    · May be:

    · Blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Double-blind: neither subject nor investigator knows which treatment the subject is receiving.

    · Non-blind: both subject and investigator know which treatment subject is receiving; used when it is felt that the knowledge of treatment is unimportant.

    LEVEL III: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization. (quasi-experimental)

    · Always includes manipulation of an independent variable

    · Lacks either random assignment or control group

    · Findings must be considered in light of threats to validity (particularly selection)

    LEVEL IV: Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies.

    · No manipulation of the independent variable.

    LEVEL V: Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies, correlational studies.

    LEVEL VI: Evidence from a single descriptive or qualitative study.

    · Explorative in nature, such as interviews, observations, or focus groups.

    · Starting point for studies of questions for which little research currently exists.

    · Sample sizes are usually small and study results are used to design stronger studies that are more objective and quantifiable.

    · Describing differences in variables between or among groups.

    · Describing relationships among variables. No attempt to understand causal relationship.

    LEVEL VII: Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees.

    QUALITY DEFINITIONS

    (Quality is based on Critical Appraisal)

    GOOD: A study meets all research design-specific criteria well

    FAIR: A study does not meet (or it is not clear that it meets) at least one design-specific criterion but has no known “fatal flaws”

    POOR: A study that has at least one design specific “fatal flaw: or an accumulation of lesser flaws.

    References

    Dearholt, S.L.; & Dang, D. (2012).
    _John Hopkins nursing-evidence based practice: model and guidelines (2nd ed.)._ John Hopkins University, School of Nursing: Sigma Theta Tau

    Fineout-Overholt, E and Melnyk, B.M. (2005).
    _Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice._ Philadephia:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    **## ResearchArticleComponentIdentificationAssignment-4201.docx**

    Research Study Component Identification Assignment

    Name: ____________________________________________________________________________

    ***Instructions:**

    1. Utilize the journal article provided, entitled:

    Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel by Salazar-Vargas et al

    [Chlorhexidine impregnated surgical scrubs and whole-body wash for reducing colonization of health care personnel – ScienceDirect](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655320300134?via%3Dihub)

    2. In the article, identify the following components (# 1-24, listed below) of the research process.  Highlight, underline or bracket,
    on the article, each component listed with the corresponding number from this worksheet.  If any component is missing, make a note next to the item on the worksheet.

    3. On the worksheet, add the
    specific page number/s (ie239, 426) where each component is found in the article.  Components may be in more than one place, so search for them.  If any components of the research process are missing, please note this on the sheet under the component, i.e. missing or N/A.

    4. Complete question #25.

    **Components:**

    1. Abstract —0.5pt

    2. Problem statement (what the problem was and why the study was needed) —2pt

    3. Purpose Statement/Purpose or aim of the study -1pt

    4. Theoretical or conceptual framework (if available) -0.5pt

    5. Review of literature (throughout the article)- 0.5pt

    6. Study design i.e. Descriptive, random control trial, quasi-experimental, case study, ethnography. What

    specific research study design was used in the article? –2pt

    7. Level of Evidence of the research study design: (no page# needed). See Level of Evidence sheet. -2pt

    8. Sample population– 0.5pt

    9. Sample size –0.5pt

    10. Inclusion Criteria of the participants (who is included in the study) -0.5pt

    11. Exclusion Criteria of participants (who is excluded in the study; this may be vague or assumed)—0.5pt

    12. Setting; Where did the study take place? 0.5pt

    13. Legal-ethical issues (IRB approval; Specific guidelines/policies followed): 0.5pt

    14. Independent and Dependent variables: (4 points)

    Independent variable/s: (Be specific; no page # needed):

    Dependent variable/s: (Be specific no page # needed):

    15. Data collection procedure/s (step by step or process of how data was collected) –2pt

    16. Measurement tools: 0.5pt

    17. Validity and reliability (this can be explained in many ways, i.e. validity of a tool or revision of a tool to

    increase reliability; training done.) –1

    18. Data analysis (methods/statistics used to analyze data) –1

    19. Results-findings; Share enough information/data to clearly state the results; be specific: 2pt

    20. Discussion –conclusions 1pt

    21. Limitations of the study i.e. small sample size, high dropout rate, one setting (if available) –0.5pt

    22. Implications for nursing practice from the findings (if available) i.e. how will this data be used? What

    education can student nurses/nurses provide patients/families/staff –1pt

    23. Suggestions for further study (if available) –1

    24. References –0.5

    25. Did the article have enough information to meet the criteria of a valid research article? Yes or No;

    Why or Why not? Please explain; MUST include strengths or weaknesses of the research article (4 pts)

    **InfectionControlJournal2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/infectioncontroljournal2-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See Attachment – ## 6PostOUT.pdf **## 6PostOUT.pdf** Medicaid discussion WHAT : Discussion Post FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years Word Count : 200 MINIMUM INCLUDE : Turnitin Report \* Please and THANK YOU * —…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See Attachment

    – ## 6PostOUT.pdf

    **## 6PostOUT.pdf**

    Medicaid discussion

    WHAT : Discussion Post

    FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List

    REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years

    Word Count : 200 MINIMUM

    INCLUDE : Turnitin Report

    \* Please and THANK YOU *

    —————————————————————————————

    • How does ACA Medicaid (Medicaid expansion) differ from
    other Medicaid programs?

    • What problem(s) was the Medicare program originally
    intended to solve?

    • What are the differences between Medicare and Medicaid?
    • Why have financial considerations been important to the

    politics of policy?
    • How does Medicare For All affect the current Medicare

    program?

    In this discussion, please debate that health care is a PRIVILEGE
    versus a right.

    **## 6PostOUT.pdf**

    Medicaid discussion

    WHAT : Discussion Post

    FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List

    REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years

    Word Count : 200 MINIMUM

    INCLUDE : Turnitin Report

    \* Please and THANK YOU *

    —————————————————————————————

    • How does ACA Medicaid (Medicaid expansion) differ from
    other Medicaid programs?

    • What problem(s) was the Medicare program originally
    intended to solve?

    • What are the differences between Medicare and Medicaid?
    • Why have financial considerations been important to the

    politics of policy?
    • How does Medicare For All affect the current Medicare

    program?

    In this discussion, please debate that health care is a PRIVILEGE
    versus a right.

  • [Solved] 612 clinical discussion 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## 612discussion3clinical.docx **## 612discussion3clinical.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/612-clinical-discussion-3)**_Weekly Clinical Experience 3_** Patient is a 73 year male coming in because he has been having knee pain Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Di…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## 612discussion3clinical.docx

    **## 612discussion3clinical.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/612-clinical-discussion-3)**_Weekly Clinical Experience 3_**

    Patient is a 73 year male coming in because he has been having knee pain

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    ## image1.png

    **## 612discussion3clinical.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/612-clinical-discussion-3)**_Weekly Clinical Experience 3_**

    Patient is a 73 year male coming in because he has been having knee pain

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] nursing informatics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Writea4.docx **## Writea4.docx** Write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes. Nurses at the baccalaureate level in all practice areas are involved in nursing informatics through inter…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Writea4.docx

    **## Writea4.docx**

    Write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes.

    Nurses at the baccalaureate level in all practice areas are involved in nursing informatics through interaction with information management and patient care technologies. Nurses must not only demonstrate knowledge of and skills in health information and patient care technologies, but also how to use these tools at the bedside and organizational levels. Moreover, nurses need to recognize how information gathered from various health information sources can impact decision making at the national and state regulatory levels.

    As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Team Perspectives of the Nurse Informaticist activity. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you explore the nurse informaticist's role from the different perspectives of the health care team. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

    To successfully prepare for this assessment, you will need to complete these preparatory activities:

    Review assessment resources and activities.

    Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    Conduct independent research on the nursing knowledge and skills necessary to interact with health information and patient care technology.

    Focus your research on current resources available through peer-reviewed articles, professional websites, government websites, professional blogs, wikis, job boards, and so on.

    Consult the BSN Program Library Research Guide for help in identifying scholarly and authoritative sources.

    Interview peers in your network who are considered information technology experts.

    Ask them about how information technology advances are impacting patient care at the bedside, at the organizational level, and beyond.

    For this assessment, assume you are a nurse attending a meeting of your state’s nurses association. A nurse informaticist conducted a presentation on their role and its impact on positive patient and organizational outcomes in their workplace. You realize that your organization is undergoing many technological changes. You believe this type of role could provide many benefits to your organization.

    Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    You decide to pursue proposing a nurse informaticist role in your organization. You speak to your chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager, who ask you to prepare a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the new role. In this way, they can make an informed decision as to whether the addition of such a role could justify the return on investment (ROI). They need your proposal before an upcoming fiscal meeting.​ This is not an essay, but instead, it is a proposal to create a new Nurse Informaticist position.

    One important part of this assessment is the justification of the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization and references from relevant and timely scholarly or professional resources to support the justification for creating this nurse informaticist position. The term justify means to show or prove that the nurse informaticist position brings value to the organization. This justification must include evidence from the literature to support that this position will provide a return on investment for the organization.

    The chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager have asked you to include the headings below in your proposal and to be sure to address the bullets following each heading. Remember that you will emphasize the focus of the new nurse informaticist position as described in the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    Nursing Informatics and the Nurse Informaticist

    What is nursing informatics?

    What is the role of the nurse informaticist?

    Highlight one influential nurse informaticist and their contributions to nursing.

    Nurse Informaticists and Other Health Care Organizations

    What is the experience of other health care organizations with nurse informaticists?

    How do these nurse informaticists collaborate with the rest of the nursing staff and the interdisciplinary team?

    Impact of Full Nurse Engagement in Health Care Technology

    How does fully engaging nurses in health care technology impact:

    Patient care?

    Protected health information (security, privacy, and confidentiality)?

    In this section, you will explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients' protected health information, particularly privacy, security, and confidentiality. Evidence-based means that they are supported by evidence from scholarly sources.

    Workflow?

    Costs and return on investment?

    Opportunities and Challenges

    What are the opportunities and challenges for nurses and the interdisciplinary team with the addition of a nurse informaticist role?

    How can the interdisciplinary team collaborate to improve quality care outcomes through technology?

    Summary of Recommendations

    What are 3–4 key takeaways from your proposal about the recommended nurse informaticist role that you want the CNO and the HR manager to remember?

    This is the section where the justification for the implementation of the nursing informaticist role is addressed. Remember to include evidence from the literature to support your recommendation.

    Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

    Submission length: 4–5 double-spaced pages, in addition to title and references pages.

    Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Citations and References: Cite a minimum of three current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your ideas. In addition, cite a minimum of one current professional blog or website to support your central ideas. Current means no more than five years old.

    APA formatting: Be sure to follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references. For an APA refresher, consult the Evidence and APA page on Campus.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

    Define nursing informatics and the role of the nurse informaticist, highlighting the contributions of an influential nurse informaticist.

    Explain how the nurse collaborates with the interdisciplinary team, including technologists, to improve the quality of patient care.

    Justify the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization.

    Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

    Explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients’ protected health information (privacy, security, and confidentiality).

    Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.

    Explain the impact of full nurse engagement in health care technology, including the opportunities and challenges.

    Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

    Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

    Create a clear, well-organized, and professional proposal that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    For this assessment, you will write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need

    for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes.

    Before you complete the detailed instructions in the courseroom, first review the focus of the

    new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the description below. You will

    write your evidence-based proposal to support the need for a new nurse informaticist who would

    focus on enhancing patient education through digital platforms.

    • Enhancing Patient Education through Digital Platforms:

    o Background: Patient education is crucial for improving adherence to treatment

    plans and promoting self-management of chronic conditions.

    o Benefits: Digital platforms, such as patient portals and mobile apps, can provide

    patients with easy access to accurate and reliable educational materials, leading

    to better understanding and management of their health. This meets many

    patients where they are and provides opportunities to provide personalized

    education tailored to a patient's specific conditions and needs. Such tools often

    take the forms of interactive multimedia that can also improve patient

    understanding.

    **## Writea4.docx**

    Write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes.

    Nurses at the baccalaureate level in all practice areas are involved in nursing informatics through interaction with information management and patient care technologies. Nurses must not only demonstrate knowledge of and skills in health information and patient care technologies, but also how to use these tools at the bedside and organizational levels. Moreover, nurses need to recognize how information gathered from various health information sources can impact decision making at the national and state regulatory levels.

    As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Team Perspectives of the Nurse Informaticist activity. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you explore the nurse informaticist's role from the different perspectives of the health care team. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

    To successfully prepare for this assessment, you will need to complete these preparatory activities:

    Review assessment resources and activities.

    Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    Conduct independent research on the nursing knowledge and skills necessary to interact with health information and patient care technology.

    Focus your research on current resources available through peer-reviewed articles, professional websites, government websites, professional blogs, wikis, job boards, and so on.

    Consult the BSN Program Library Research Guide for help in identifying scholarly and authoritative sources.

    Interview peers in your network who are considered information technology experts.

    Ask them about how information technology advances are impacting patient care at the bedside, at the organizational level, and beyond.

    For this assessment, assume you are a nurse attending a meeting of your state’s nurses association. A nurse informaticist conducted a presentation on their role and its impact on positive patient and organizational outcomes in their workplace. You realize that your organization is undergoing many technological changes. You believe this type of role could provide many benefits to your organization.

    Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    You decide to pursue proposing a nurse informaticist role in your organization. You speak to your chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager, who ask you to prepare a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the new role. In this way, they can make an informed decision as to whether the addition of such a role could justify the return on investment (ROI). They need your proposal before an upcoming fiscal meeting.​ This is not an essay, but instead, it is a proposal to create a new Nurse Informaticist position.

    One important part of this assessment is the justification of the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization and references from relevant and timely scholarly or professional resources to support the justification for creating this nurse informaticist position. The term justify means to show or prove that the nurse informaticist position brings value to the organization. This justification must include evidence from the literature to support that this position will provide a return on investment for the organization.

    The chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager have asked you to include the headings below in your proposal and to be sure to address the bullets following each heading. Remember that you will emphasize the focus of the new nurse informaticist position as described in the Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF] Download Assessment 01 – Nursing Informatics in Health Care [PDF]resource.

    Nursing Informatics and the Nurse Informaticist

    What is nursing informatics?

    What is the role of the nurse informaticist?

    Highlight one influential nurse informaticist and their contributions to nursing.

    Nurse Informaticists and Other Health Care Organizations

    What is the experience of other health care organizations with nurse informaticists?

    How do these nurse informaticists collaborate with the rest of the nursing staff and the interdisciplinary team?

    Impact of Full Nurse Engagement in Health Care Technology

    How does fully engaging nurses in health care technology impact:

    Patient care?

    Protected health information (security, privacy, and confidentiality)?

    In this section, you will explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients' protected health information, particularly privacy, security, and confidentiality. Evidence-based means that they are supported by evidence from scholarly sources.

    Workflow?

    Costs and return on investment?

    Opportunities and Challenges

    What are the opportunities and challenges for nurses and the interdisciplinary team with the addition of a nurse informaticist role?

    How can the interdisciplinary team collaborate to improve quality care outcomes through technology?

    Summary of Recommendations

    What are 3–4 key takeaways from your proposal about the recommended nurse informaticist role that you want the CNO and the HR manager to remember?

    This is the section where the justification for the implementation of the nursing informaticist role is addressed. Remember to include evidence from the literature to support your recommendation.

    Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

    Submission length: 4–5 double-spaced pages, in addition to title and references pages.

    Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Citations and References: Cite a minimum of three current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your ideas. In addition, cite a minimum of one current professional blog or website to support your central ideas. Current means no more than five years old.

    APA formatting: Be sure to follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references. For an APA refresher, consult the Evidence and APA page on Campus.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

    Define nursing informatics and the role of the nurse informaticist, highlighting the contributions of an influential nurse informaticist.

    Explain how the nurse collaborates with the interdisciplinary team, including technologists, to improve the quality of patient care.

    Justify the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization.

    Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

    Explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients’ protected health information (privacy, security, and confidentiality).

    Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.

    Explain the impact of full nurse engagement in health care technology, including the opportunities and challenges.

    Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

    Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

    Create a clear, well-organized, and professional proposal that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    For this assessment, you will write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need

    for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes.

    Before you complete the detailed instructions in the courseroom, first review the focus of the

    new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the description below. You will

    write your evidence-based proposal to support the need for a new nurse informaticist who would

    focus on enhancing patient education through digital platforms.

    • Enhancing Patient Education through Digital Platforms:

    o Background: Patient education is crucial for improving adherence to treatment

    plans and promoting self-management of chronic conditions.

    o Benefits: Digital platforms, such as patient portals and mobile apps, can provide

    patients with easy access to accurate and reliable educational materials, leading

    to better understanding and management of their health. This meets many

    patients where they are and provides opportunities to provide personalized

    education tailored to a patient's specific conditions and needs. Such tools often

    take the forms of interactive multimedia that can also improve patient

    understanding.

  • [Solved] Weekly Clinical Experience 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Weekly Clinical Experience 3**_ Describe your clinical experience for this week as a student nurse practitioner taking care of geriatric patients. – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), ass…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Weekly Clinical Experience 3**_
    Describe your clinical experience for this week as a student nurse practitioner taking care of geriatric patients.
    – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
    – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    – Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
    – What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
    – Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.
    **Submission Instructions:**
    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

  • [Solved] Ethics Discussion Board Prompt

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## EthicsDiscussionBoardPrompt.docx **## EthicsDiscussionBoardPrompt.docx** **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!** **Discussion: Ethics in Research** **Ethics Discussion Board Prompt** After watching the film “Mis…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## EthicsDiscussionBoardPrompt.docx

    **## EthicsDiscussionBoardPrompt.docx**

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Discussion: Ethics in Research**

    **Ethics Discussion Board Prompt**

    After watching the film “Miss Evers’ Boys” identify two ethical dilemmas that faced the characters in the movie. Describe the ethical dilemmas and the ethical principles involved. Describe how the experiment violated the American Nurses Association ([ANA], 2015) code of ethics by identifying one provision from the code that was violated. If you had been involved with the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, what would you have done differently to protect human subjects? Why did you choose this specific change: i.e., what benefit could it have provided?

    **A note on sources**

    Only scholarly sources are acceptable in graduate-level discussion posts and must be properly cited according to APA 7th edition.

    · Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, .com websites, or blogs are not acceptable. When using internet sources, only reputable websites by government agencies (.gov) or respected organizations (.org) will be considered to be scholarly sources.

    **## EthicsDiscussionBoardPrompt.docx**

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Discussion: Ethics in Research**

    **Ethics Discussion Board Prompt**

    After watching the film “Miss Evers’ Boys” identify two ethical dilemmas that faced the characters in the movie. Describe the ethical dilemmas and the ethical principles involved. Describe how the experiment violated the American Nurses Association ([ANA], 2015) code of ethics by identifying one provision from the code that was violated. If you had been involved with the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, what would you have done differently to protect human subjects? Why did you choose this specific change: i.e., what benefit could it have provided?

    **A note on sources**

    Only scholarly sources are acceptable in graduate-level discussion posts and must be properly cited according to APA 7th edition.

    · Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, .com websites, or blogs are not acceptable. When using internet sources, only reputable websites by government agencies (.gov) or respected organizations (.org) will be considered to be scholarly sources.

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Nursing Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] HCM612 DB1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As you begin to consider your career goals, it is important to clarify your specific needs and interests. In most instances, you cannot get the job you want if you are not clear about what you are searching for as well as the types of jobs for which you qualify. With this in mind, discuss the follow…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As you begin to consider your career goals, it is important to clarify your specific needs and interests. In most instances, you cannot get the job you want if you are not clear about what you are searching for as well as the types of jobs for which you qualify. With this in mind, discuss the following:
    – Why did you decide to go into health care?
    – What job titles have you considered?
    – What skills and abilities would you like to use in your day-to-day work?
    – What type of health care setting do you imagine yourself working in?

  • [Solved] Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Health.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.