Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Political Science Homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Political Science Homework help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Mod 4 creative

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module4Creative.docx – ## OGL550_Module4_PowerPoliticalLens.pdf – ## OGL550_Module4_PsychicPrison.pdf – toolsforanalyzingpower.pdf – HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf **## Module4Creative.docx** Mod 4 Creative FUN Activity (I hope — just roll with it!) · **Due** Sunday by 11:59…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module4Creative.docx

    – ## OGL550_Module4_PowerPoliticalLens.pdf

    – ## OGL550_Module4_PsychicPrison.pdf

    – toolsforanalyzingpower.pdf
    – HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf

    **## Module4Creative.docx**

    Mod 4 Creative FUN Activity (I hope — just roll with it!)

    ·
    **Due** Sunday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    **FIRST: YES! You ARE CREATIVE ENOUGH for THIS activity.** I promise you: Artistic
    **talent** is
    **NOT needed**.

    Since the PESTLE activity could take A LOT OF TIME to complete, I wanted to make THIS activity a bit more whimsical — while still basing it on our videos and readings. So let's do a FUN AND INTERPRETIVE one-page activity like so:

    —
    **Watch AT LEAST TWO MORE of the videos** [on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/pages/module-4-learning-materials) (
    **NOT including** the "Plato's Allegory of the Cave" videos which you need to watch already).
    —
    **Read TWO** OF THE ARTICLES (
    **not the textbook** chapters) provided on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page.

    **HOW TO PROCEED:**
    **On a blank sheet of paper (or a blank page on a computer screen,** if you prefer to work digitally — but WITHOUT any A.I. "help" of course — CREATE a ONE-PAGE, ILLUSTRATION-HEAVY reaction to what you have viewed and read — with SKETCHES OF AT LEAST TWO CONCEPTS PER VIDEO and ARTICLE:

    1.
    **At the top of the page, briefly note source info (authors, titles, names of the videos, etc.)** —  enough to clearly identify the videos and readings from our Mod 4 Learning Materials page. Then start drawing!

    2.
    **You may either draw FOUR LINES to divide the page into four sections (one for each video and reading); you could then insert TWO sketches / stick figure drawings into each quadrant.** OR you may combine aspects of some videos/readings into your drawings, as long as you end up with at least eight (8) distinct sketches/drawings.

    For example, your page might be divided up like so,
    with two stick figures (and a few important notes) in each of the four quadrants:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |
    | | |

    3.
    **These SHOULD NOT BE "GOOD" illustrations but just sketches. I mean that "STICK FIGURES" and SIMPLE SYMBOLS are fine.**

    4.
    **It's vital to do this with your own hand / your own trackpad (and NO A.I.)** because I may pick some of the "best" or "wildest" of these to show off to the rest of the class (and if someone uses A.I. or an "auto-drawing program" it will just be embarrassing to everyone, plus all the plagiarism stuff…yuck).

    5. Add some brief notes in your own handwriting or typed, explaining your sketches in some detail, i.e., explaining the context in the materials.

    6.
    **Upload the page here (in this Canvas assignment).**

    Resources

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D)

    **## OGL550_Module4_PowerPoliticalLens.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Political Systems
    Morgan Ch. 6

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Types of Political Systems
    • Autocracy–Power is held by individual or small group

    • Bureaucracy–Power exercised through use of rules and the written word

    • Technocracy–Rule exercised through use of knowledge

    • Codetermination–Form of rule where opposing parties combine in the joint
    management of mutual interests

    • Representative democracy–Rule exercised through the election of officers mandated to
    act on behalf of the electorate

    • Direct democracy–System where everyone has an equal right to rule and is involved in
    all decision making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations, Control, & Power
    “We rely on a company to pay our wages. But does this mean it has the right control all
    our beliefs and feelings? It certainly has no right to reduce us to robots who must obey
    every command!”

    • An organization’s politics manifest in the conflicts and power plays and interpersonal
    relationships that guide the flow of organizational activity.

    • Politics occur on an ongoing basis, often in a way that is invisible to all but those directly
    involved.

    • Power: can be viewed as a resource, as a social relationship (e.g., dependency), or as
    influence/persuasion/coercion.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Interests, Conflict, & Power
    Interests: Examples of three different types:
    • Task Interests–connected with the work one has to perform
    • Career Interests–independent of the job being performed
    • Extramural Interests–Act towards the relation to both job and career

    Conflict: Where interests collide
    • Conflict may be personal or interpersonal, e.g., self, teams, rival groups
    • Built into organizations through roles
    • Attitudes, stereotypes, scarcity of resources

    Power: Medium through which conflicts of interest are resolved. Sources of power:
    • Formal Authority
    • Control of Scarce Resources
    • Use of organizational structure, rules and regulations
    • Control of decision powers, knowledge and information, boundaries, and/or technology

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Relationship between Management and Workers
    Unitary
    • Organization is perceived as integrated, harmonious whole: e.g., “one happy family”, where

    management and other members of the staff all share a common purpose.
    • Emphasis on mutual cooperation.
    • May use paternalistic approach that demands loyalty of all employees, being predominantly

    managerial in its emphasis and application

    Pluralist
    • Organization is perceived as being composed of powerful and divergent sub-groups, each

    with its own loyalties and set of objectives and leaders.
    • Two predominant sub-groups in the pluralistic perspective are management and trade

    unions.

    Marxist or Radical
    • Looks at division of interest between capital and labor
    • Sees inequalities of power and economic wealth as inherent in capitalist economic system
    • Conflict is seen as inevitable, with trade unions a natural response of workers

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    Competing—to take quick, decisive action; for enforcing unpopular rules and decisions

    Collaborating—for synthesizing insights of different stakeholders; fostering
    organizational learning

    Compromising—to arrive at mutually acceptable, expedient solutions

    Avoiding—to buy time, or to put energy to more productive issues

    Accommodating—to satisfy others when issues are not paramount to you; to minimize
    loss when it’s clear you can’t win

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor
    Strengths
    • Surfaces taboo subject such as people pushing for their private motives
    • Recognizes role and use of power at the center of organizational analysis.
    • Challenges the myth of organizational rationality.
    • Helps us understand human behavior in organizations
    • Recognizes the socio-political implications of organizational dynamics and the roles

    that organizations play in society

    Limitations
    • Can lead to increased politicization of the organization
    • Focus on conflict and control may make it harder to see positive aspects of organizing

    and the potential for shared power to transform systems

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Political Systems��Morgan Ch. 6
    – Types of Political Systems
    – Organizations, Control, & Power
    – Interests, Conflict, & Power
    – Relationship between Management and Workers
    – Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    – Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor

    **## OGL550_Module4_PsychicPrison.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Psychic Prisons
    Morgan Ch. 7

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Psychic Prison Metaphor
    “ Human beings have a knack for getting trapped in webs of their own creation.”

    This metaphor looks at organization as psychological phenomena, as being created and sustained
    by conscious and unconscious processes.

    Examines people as becoming imprisoned or confined by the images, ideas, thoughts and actions
    of psychological processes

    Considers human condition as potentially trapped in:
    • Modes of Thinking
    • Constructions of Perceived Reality that offer imperfect and incomplete grasp of the world
    • People may become “imprisoned”, “confined” or “controlled” by, or within, organizations

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Plato’s Cave Allegory
    • First exploration of Psychic Prison metaphor by Greek Philosopher Plato in his work “The Republic‟
    (c. 380 BC)

    • Prisoners were chained to an underground cave wall. They could not move, or view the outside world

    • Interpretation of shadows comprised their entire reality

    • A liberated prisoner discovered that the world beyond the shadows was richer, more complex &
    rewarding

    • Upon return to cave, his experiences terrified fellow cave dwellers

    • He could not remain & stagnate.

    • They could not change or move forward • They perceived him as “dangerous”

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Group Think
    • Described by Psychologist, Irving Janis in 1952

    • Organizational, social & cultural traps that inhibit problem solving by preventing recognition
    of alternate avenues of thought, discussion & action

    • Group illusions of invulnerability, morality & unanimity foster “assumed consensus” which
    inhibit expressions of doubt & engender misguided decision-making

    Examples

    • The Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961): President Kennedy & his advisors developed illusions of
    unanimity & invulnerability; doubts were inhibited & suppressed

    • The Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (1986): After 55 successful missions NASA felt
    invincible • Fatally ignored crucial warnings about faulty equipment

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations and the Unconscious
    • Sigmund Freud argued that the unconscious is created as humans repress their inner-most desires

    and private thoughts.
    • Sees much visible culture as preoccupation & concerns of the unconscious psyche
    • People become psychic prisoners through repression of their unconscious desires & thoughts
    • We can try to understand & interpret these phenomena across dimensions that include: • Sexuality •

    Family Dynamics • Mortality • Anxiety • Artefacts (Objects & Symbols) • Shadows & Archetypes

    Examples:
    • Neurotic traits
    • Establishment of formal organizations, e.g. armies, religious orders, industrial society, bureaucracies
    • Creation of Scientific Management innovations, ideas, planning & productivity such as:
    • Historical replication of Patriarchal systems: authoritarian, aggressive & chauvinistic (negative) or

    brave, heroic & decisive (positive)
    • Matriarchal approach now seen as increasingly effective, empowering organizational trust, creativity &

    co-operation

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    For each psychic prison, ask yourself two questions:

    1.What is the dysfunctional story/myth?
    2. How does the story/myth control fear and anxiety?

    Example: Organization and Repressed Sexuality
    When leaders and workers have strong desires to control and become

    disciplined in every aspect of life. Taylor is exemplified by this Psychic Prison.

    Dysfunctional story: social order to maintained through discipline and control.

    How does story control fear? Tight supervision so there are no surprises.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Defense Mechanisms
    • Repression: “pushing down” unwanted impulses and ideas

    • Denial: refusal to acknowledge an impulse-evoking fact, feeling or memory

    • Displacement: shifting impulses aroused by one person or situation to a safer target

    • Fixation: rigid commitment to a particular attitude or behavior

    • Projection: attribution of one’s own feelings and impulses to others

    • Rationalization: creation of elaborate schemes of justification that disguise underlying
    motives and intentions

    • Idealization: playing up the good aspects of a situation to protect oneself from the bad

    • Splitting: isolating different elements of experience, often to protect the good from the
    bad.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    • (Re)producing organizational structure that gives dominance to males.
    • Culture in which white males rule the field and know best which decisions to make.
    • Competition, domination, and no emotions are cultural norms.
    • Dysfunctional story: White men are more effective leaders.
    • How does story control fear? Creates rigid structures and mental models the produce social control,

    giving a sense of stability and security.

    Patriarchal Family: prolonged dependency of the child upon the parents facilitates the kind of
    dependency institutionalized in the relationship between leaders and followers, and in the practice
    where people look to others to initiate action in response to problematic issues.

    Key organizational members also often cultivate fatherly roles by acting as mentors to those in need of
    help and protection. The psychic prison structure of the male-dominated family tends to create a
    feelings of impotence, accompanied by a fear of, and dependence on, authority.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Immortality and Death
    • Humans are afraid of dying. Death reminds us of our limitations and lack of control.
    • Organizations are a way to connect with something more enduring than our physical bodies.
    • Dysfunctional story : We won’t die if we are attached to something more enduring than ourselves.
    • How does the story control fear? When people believe they will endure, they are more likely to obey

    authority.

    Human beings, aware of the impermanence & vulnerability of life, use Organizations (through culture)
    to:

    • Search for meaning & permanency;
    • Preserve a sense of belonging & identity
    • Manage, organize & motivate themselves
    • Imagine the achievement of immortality through recorded beliefs, deeds, roles & material objects
    • As we invest ourselves in our work, our roles become our realities and sense of self.
    • Making the complex simple. We manage our world by simplifying it, because in making it simple we

    feel like we have control.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    Dysfunctional story: World can be divided into good versus evil. Evil wishes to destroy us
    and we must survive it.

    To cope with anxiety:

    • we may depend on leader to control or save us

    • Make enemies even when there aren’t any (“othering”)

    • How does the story reduce fear? It draws the worker into the good/fear dichotomy and
    allows leaders to do what they want without protest

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    Organizations interpreted through Artifacts
    • “Transitional objects” (e. g. toys) & symbolic experiences help people cope with change. Gives

    people something else to hold onto while change occurs.
    • Over-reliance may facilitate resistance to progress (e. g. hoarding of objects), and block creativity &

    innovation in organizations
    • Dysfunctional story : Change is bad!
    • How does story control fear? If everything stays the same, we will not get harmed; the old and

    unchanging will keep us safe.

    Shadows & Archetypes:
    • View of human psyche espoused by psychiatrist Carl Jung
    • Archetypes (patterns & ideas) link the “collective unconscious” to individuals & perpetuate recurring

    organizational themes
    • Shadows: repressed & rival instincts of individuals compete to influence organizational decision-

    making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor
    Strengths:
    • Assists understanding of Organizational change and why people resist it
    • Releases positive energies for transformation & integration
    • Surfaces links between irrational & rational, recognizes ethical dimensions
    • Offers holistic approach to organizational life

    Weaknesses
    • Neglects conscious ideological factors of organizational life
    • Over-emphasizes cognitive processes
    • Potential for “Orwellian” manipulation of the unconscious mind

    Conclusion
    • Draws from interdisciplinary theories from philosophy, organizational theory, psychiatry and

    psychology, sociology, cultural Studies & other fields
    • Offers profound psychological insights into the nature & complexity of organizations at both the

    unconscious & conscious level

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Psychic Prisons��Morgan Ch. 7
    – Psychic Prison Metaphor
    – Plato’s Cave Allegory
    – Group Think
    – Organizations and the Unconscious
    – Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    – Defense Mechanisms
    – Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    – Immortality and Death
    – Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    – Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    – Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor

    **toolsforanalyzingpower.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/toolsforanalyzingpower-pdf-10361089)

    **HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hbr-powerandpoliticsinorganizationallife-pdf-10361091)

    **HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hbr-powerandpoliticsinorganizationallife-pdf-10361091)

    **## Module4Creative.docx**

    Mod 4 Creative FUN Activity (I hope — just roll with it!)

    ·
    **Due** Sunday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    **FIRST: YES! You ARE CREATIVE ENOUGH for THIS activity.** I promise you: Artistic
    **talent** is
    **NOT needed**.

    Since the PESTLE activity could take A LOT OF TIME to complete, I wanted to make THIS activity a bit more whimsical — while still basing it on our videos and readings. So let's do a FUN AND INTERPRETIVE one-page activity like so:

    —
    **Watch AT LEAST TWO MORE of the videos** [on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/pages/module-4-learning-materials) (
    **NOT including** the "Plato's Allegory of the Cave" videos which you need to watch already).
    —
    **Read TWO** OF THE ARTICLES (
    **not the textbook** chapters) provided on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page.

    **HOW TO PROCEED:**
    **On a blank sheet of paper (or a blank page on a computer screen,** if you prefer to work digitally — but WITHOUT any A.I. "help" of course — CREATE a ONE-PAGE, ILLUSTRATION-HEAVY reaction to what you have viewed and read — with SKETCHES OF AT LEAST TWO CONCEPTS PER VIDEO and ARTICLE:

    1.
    **At the top of the page, briefly note source info (authors, titles, names of the videos, etc.)** —  enough to clearly identify the videos and readings from our Mod 4 Learning Materials page. Then start drawing!

    2.
    **You may either draw FOUR LINES to divide the page into four sections (one for each video and reading); you could then insert TWO sketches / stick figure drawings into each quadrant.** OR you may combine aspects of some videos/readings into your drawings, as long as you end up with at least eight (8) distinct sketches/drawings.

    For example, your page might be divided up like so,
    with two stick figures (and a few important notes) in each of the four quadrants:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |
    | | |

    3.
    **These SHOULD NOT BE "GOOD" illustrations but just sketches. I mean that "STICK FIGURES" and SIMPLE SYMBOLS are fine.**

    4.
    **It's vital to do this with your own hand / your own trackpad (and NO A.I.)** because I may pick some of the "best" or "wildest" of these to show off to the rest of the class (and if someone uses A.I. or an "auto-drawing program" it will just be embarrassing to everyone, plus all the plagiarism stuff…yuck).

    5. Add some brief notes in your own handwriting or typed, explaining your sketches in some detail, i.e., explaining the context in the materials.

    6.
    **Upload the page here (in this Canvas assignment).**

    Resources

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D)

    **## OGL550_Module4_PowerPoliticalLens.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Political Systems
    Morgan Ch. 6

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Types of Political Systems
    • Autocracy–Power is held by individual or small group

    • Bureaucracy–Power exercised through use of rules and the written word

    • Technocracy–Rule exercised through use of knowledge

    • Codetermination–Form of rule where opposing parties combine in the joint
    management of mutual interests

    • Representative democracy–Rule exercised through the election of officers mandated to
    act on behalf of the electorate

    • Direct democracy–System where everyone has an equal right to rule and is involved in
    all decision making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations, Control, & Power
    “We rely on a company to pay our wages. But does this mean it has the right control all
    our beliefs and feelings? It certainly has no right to reduce us to robots who must obey
    every command!”

    • An organization’s politics manifest in the conflicts and power plays and interpersonal
    relationships that guide the flow of organizational activity.

    • Politics occur on an ongoing basis, often in a way that is invisible to all but those directly
    involved.

    • Power: can be viewed as a resource, as a social relationship (e.g., dependency), or as
    influence/persuasion/coercion.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Interests, Conflict, & Power
    Interests: Examples of three different types:
    • Task Interests–connected with the work one has to perform
    • Career Interests–independent of the job being performed
    • Extramural Interests–Act towards the relation to both job and career

    Conflict: Where interests collide
    • Conflict may be personal or interpersonal, e.g., self, teams, rival groups
    • Built into organizations through roles
    • Attitudes, stereotypes, scarcity of resources

    Power: Medium through which conflicts of interest are resolved. Sources of power:
    • Formal Authority
    • Control of Scarce Resources
    • Use of organizational structure, rules and regulations
    • Control of decision powers, knowledge and information, boundaries, and/or technology

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Relationship between Management and Workers
    Unitary
    • Organization is perceived as integrated, harmonious whole: e.g., “one happy family”, where

    management and other members of the staff all share a common purpose.
    • Emphasis on mutual cooperation.
    • May use paternalistic approach that demands loyalty of all employees, being predominantly

    managerial in its emphasis and application

    Pluralist
    • Organization is perceived as being composed of powerful and divergent sub-groups, each

    with its own loyalties and set of objectives and leaders.
    • Two predominant sub-groups in the pluralistic perspective are management and trade

    unions.

    Marxist or Radical
    • Looks at division of interest between capital and labor
    • Sees inequalities of power and economic wealth as inherent in capitalist economic system
    • Conflict is seen as inevitable, with trade unions a natural response of workers

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    Competing—to take quick, decisive action; for enforcing unpopular rules and decisions

    Collaborating—for synthesizing insights of different stakeholders; fostering
    organizational learning

    Compromising—to arrive at mutually acceptable, expedient solutions

    Avoiding—to buy time, or to put energy to more productive issues

    Accommodating—to satisfy others when issues are not paramount to you; to minimize
    loss when it’s clear you can’t win

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor
    Strengths
    • Surfaces taboo subject such as people pushing for their private motives
    • Recognizes role and use of power at the center of organizational analysis.
    • Challenges the myth of organizational rationality.
    • Helps us understand human behavior in organizations
    • Recognizes the socio-political implications of organizational dynamics and the roles

    that organizations play in society

    Limitations
    • Can lead to increased politicization of the organization
    • Focus on conflict and control may make it harder to see positive aspects of organizing

    and the potential for shared power to transform systems

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Political Systems��Morgan Ch. 6
    – Types of Political Systems
    – Organizations, Control, & Power
    – Interests, Conflict, & Power
    – Relationship between Management and Workers
    – Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    – Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor

    **## OGL550_Module4_PsychicPrison.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Psychic Prisons
    Morgan Ch. 7

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Psychic Prison Metaphor
    “ Human beings have a knack for getting trapped in webs of their own creation.”

    This metaphor looks at organization as psychological phenomena, as being created and sustained
    by conscious and unconscious processes.

    Examines people as becoming imprisoned or confined by the images, ideas, thoughts and actions
    of psychological processes

    Considers human condition as potentially trapped in:
    • Modes of Thinking
    • Constructions of Perceived Reality that offer imperfect and incomplete grasp of the world
    • People may become “imprisoned”, “confined” or “controlled” by, or within, organizations

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Plato’s Cave Allegory
    • First exploration of Psychic Prison metaphor by Greek Philosopher Plato in his work “The Republic‟
    (c. 380 BC)

    • Prisoners were chained to an underground cave wall. They could not move, or view the outside world

    • Interpretation of shadows comprised their entire reality

    • A liberated prisoner discovered that the world beyond the shadows was richer, more complex &
    rewarding

    • Upon return to cave, his experiences terrified fellow cave dwellers

    • He could not remain & stagnate.

    • They could not change or move forward • They perceived him as “dangerous”

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Group Think
    • Described by Psychologist, Irving Janis in 1952

    • Organizational, social & cultural traps that inhibit problem solving by preventing recognition
    of alternate avenues of thought, discussion & action

    • Group illusions of invulnerability, morality & unanimity foster “assumed consensus” which
    inhibit expressions of doubt & engender misguided decision-making

    Examples

    • The Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961): President Kennedy & his advisors developed illusions of
    unanimity & invulnerability; doubts were inhibited & suppressed

    • The Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (1986): After 55 successful missions NASA felt
    invincible • Fatally ignored crucial warnings about faulty equipment

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations and the Unconscious
    • Sigmund Freud argued that the unconscious is created as humans repress their inner-most desires

    and private thoughts.
    • Sees much visible culture as preoccupation & concerns of the unconscious psyche
    • People become psychic prisoners through repression of their unconscious desires & thoughts
    • We can try to understand & interpret these phenomena across dimensions that include: • Sexuality •

    Family Dynamics • Mortality • Anxiety • Artefacts (Objects & Symbols) • Shadows & Archetypes

    Examples:
    • Neurotic traits
    • Establishment of formal organizations, e.g. armies, religious orders, industrial society, bureaucracies
    • Creation of Scientific Management innovations, ideas, planning & productivity such as:
    • Historical replication of Patriarchal systems: authoritarian, aggressive & chauvinistic (negative) or

    brave, heroic & decisive (positive)
    • Matriarchal approach now seen as increasingly effective, empowering organizational trust, creativity &

    co-operation

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    For each psychic prison, ask yourself two questions:

    1.What is the dysfunctional story/myth?
    2. How does the story/myth control fear and anxiety?

    Example: Organization and Repressed Sexuality
    When leaders and workers have strong desires to control and become

    disciplined in every aspect of life. Taylor is exemplified by this Psychic Prison.

    Dysfunctional story: social order to maintained through discipline and control.

    How does story control fear? Tight supervision so there are no surprises.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Defense Mechanisms
    • Repression: “pushing down” unwanted impulses and ideas

    • Denial: refusal to acknowledge an impulse-evoking fact, feeling or memory

    • Displacement: shifting impulses aroused by one person or situation to a safer target

    • Fixation: rigid commitment to a particular attitude or behavior

    • Projection: attribution of one’s own feelings and impulses to others

    • Rationalization: creation of elaborate schemes of justification that disguise underlying
    motives and intentions

    • Idealization: playing up the good aspects of a situation to protect oneself from the bad

    • Splitting: isolating different elements of experience, often to protect the good from the
    bad.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    • (Re)producing organizational structure that gives dominance to males.
    • Culture in which white males rule the field and know best which decisions to make.
    • Competition, domination, and no emotions are cultural norms.
    • Dysfunctional story: White men are more effective leaders.
    • How does story control fear? Creates rigid structures and mental models the produce social control,

    giving a sense of stability and security.

    Patriarchal Family: prolonged dependency of the child upon the parents facilitates the kind of
    dependency institutionalized in the relationship between leaders and followers, and in the practice
    where people look to others to initiate action in response to problematic issues.

    Key organizational members also often cultivate fatherly roles by acting as mentors to those in need of
    help and protection. The psychic prison structure of the male-dominated family tends to create a
    feelings of impotence, accompanied by a fear of, and dependence on, authority.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Immortality and Death
    • Humans are afraid of dying. Death reminds us of our limitations and lack of control.
    • Organizations are a way to connect with something more enduring than our physical bodies.
    • Dysfunctional story : We won’t die if we are attached to something more enduring than ourselves.
    • How does the story control fear? When people believe they will endure, they are more likely to obey

    authority.

    Human beings, aware of the impermanence & vulnerability of life, use Organizations (through culture)
    to:

    • Search for meaning & permanency;
    • Preserve a sense of belonging & identity
    • Manage, organize & motivate themselves
    • Imagine the achievement of immortality through recorded beliefs, deeds, roles & material objects
    • As we invest ourselves in our work, our roles become our realities and sense of self.
    • Making the complex simple. We manage our world by simplifying it, because in making it simple we

    feel like we have control.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    Dysfunctional story: World can be divided into good versus evil. Evil wishes to destroy us
    and we must survive it.

    To cope with anxiety:

    • we may depend on leader to control or save us

    • Make enemies even when there aren’t any (“othering”)

    • How does the story reduce fear? It draws the worker into the good/fear dichotomy and
    allows leaders to do what they want without protest

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    Organizations interpreted through Artifacts
    • “Transitional objects” (e. g. toys) & symbolic experiences help people cope with change. Gives

    people something else to hold onto while change occurs.
    • Over-reliance may facilitate resistance to progress (e. g. hoarding of objects), and block creativity &

    innovation in organizations
    • Dysfunctional story : Change is bad!
    • How does story control fear? If everything stays the same, we will not get harmed; the old and

    unchanging will keep us safe.

    Shadows & Archetypes:
    • View of human psyche espoused by psychiatrist Carl Jung
    • Archetypes (patterns & ideas) link the “collective unconscious” to individuals & perpetuate recurring

    organizational themes
    • Shadows: repressed & rival instincts of individuals compete to influence organizational decision-

    making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor
    Strengths:
    • Assists understanding of Organizational change and why people resist it
    • Releases positive energies for transformation & integration
    • Surfaces links between irrational & rational, recognizes ethical dimensions
    • Offers holistic approach to organizational life

    Weaknesses
    • Neglects conscious ideological factors of organizational life
    • Over-emphasizes cognitive processes
    • Potential for “Orwellian” manipulation of the unconscious mind

    Conclusion
    • Draws from interdisciplinary theories from philosophy, organizational theory, psychiatry and

    psychology, sociology, cultural Studies & other fields
    • Offers profound psychological insights into the nature & complexity of organizations at both the

    unconscious & conscious level

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Psychic Prisons��Morgan Ch. 7
    – Psychic Prison Metaphor
    – Plato’s Cave Allegory
    – Group Think
    – Organizations and the Unconscious
    – Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    – Defense Mechanisms
    – Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    – Immortality and Death
    – Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    – Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    – Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor

    **toolsforanalyzingpower.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/toolsforanalyzingpower-pdf-10361089)

    **HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hbr-powerandpoliticsinorganizationallife-pdf-10361091)

    **## Module4Creative.docx**

    Mod 4 Creative FUN Activity (I hope — just roll with it!)

    ·
    **Due** Sunday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    **FIRST: YES! You ARE CREATIVE ENOUGH for THIS activity.** I promise you: Artistic
    **talent** is
    **NOT needed**.

    Since the PESTLE activity could take A LOT OF TIME to complete, I wanted to make THIS activity a bit more whimsical — while still basing it on our videos and readings. So let's do a FUN AND INTERPRETIVE one-page activity like so:

    —
    **Watch AT LEAST TWO MORE of the videos** [on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/pages/module-4-learning-materials) (
    **NOT including** the "Plato's Allegory of the Cave" videos which you need to watch already).
    —
    **Read TWO** OF THE ARTICLES (
    **not the textbook** chapters) provided on the "Mod 4 Learning Materials" page.

    **HOW TO PROCEED:**
    **On a blank sheet of paper (or a blank page on a computer screen,** if you prefer to work digitally — but WITHOUT any A.I. "help" of course — CREATE a ONE-PAGE, ILLUSTRATION-HEAVY reaction to what you have viewed and read — with SKETCHES OF AT LEAST TWO CONCEPTS PER VIDEO and ARTICLE:

    1.
    **At the top of the page, briefly note source info (authors, titles, names of the videos, etc.)** —  enough to clearly identify the videos and readings from our Mod 4 Learning Materials page. Then start drawing!

    2.
    **You may either draw FOUR LINES to divide the page into four sections (one for each video and reading); you could then insert TWO sketches / stick figure drawings into each quadrant.** OR you may combine aspects of some videos/readings into your drawings, as long as you end up with at least eight (8) distinct sketches/drawings.

    For example, your page might be divided up like so,
    with two stick figures (and a few important notes) in each of the four quadrants:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |
    | | |

    3.
    **These SHOULD NOT BE "GOOD" illustrations but just sketches. I mean that "STICK FIGURES" and SIMPLE SYMBOLS are fine.**

    4.
    **It's vital to do this with your own hand / your own trackpad (and NO A.I.)** because I may pick some of the "best" or "wildest" of these to show off to the rest of the class (and if someone uses A.I. or an "auto-drawing program" it will just be embarrassing to everyone, plus all the plagiarism stuff…yuck).

    5. Add some brief notes in your own handwriting or typed, explaining your sketches in some detail, i.e., explaining the context in the materials.

    6.
    **Upload the page here (in this Canvas assignment).**

    Resources

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guE154B6P8Q)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k185ZhNz9nw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AozJ4AkgAMw)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oO08AwLpc)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCvmsMzlF7o&list=PLr3XIBco3u_O3RZGLeWaFPyZ6WhL8v86D)

    **## OGL550_Module4_PowerPoliticalLens.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Political Systems
    Morgan Ch. 6

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Types of Political Systems
    • Autocracy–Power is held by individual or small group

    • Bureaucracy–Power exercised through use of rules and the written word

    • Technocracy–Rule exercised through use of knowledge

    • Codetermination–Form of rule where opposing parties combine in the joint
    management of mutual interests

    • Representative democracy–Rule exercised through the election of officers mandated to
    act on behalf of the electorate

    • Direct democracy–System where everyone has an equal right to rule and is involved in
    all decision making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations, Control, & Power
    “We rely on a company to pay our wages. But does this mean it has the right control all
    our beliefs and feelings? It certainly has no right to reduce us to robots who must obey
    every command!”

    • An organization’s politics manifest in the conflicts and power plays and interpersonal
    relationships that guide the flow of organizational activity.

    • Politics occur on an ongoing basis, often in a way that is invisible to all but those directly
    involved.

    • Power: can be viewed as a resource, as a social relationship (e.g., dependency), or as
    influence/persuasion/coercion.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Interests, Conflict, & Power
    Interests: Examples of three different types:
    • Task Interests–connected with the work one has to perform
    • Career Interests–independent of the job being performed
    • Extramural Interests–Act towards the relation to both job and career

    Conflict: Where interests collide
    • Conflict may be personal or interpersonal, e.g., self, teams, rival groups
    • Built into organizations through roles
    • Attitudes, stereotypes, scarcity of resources

    Power: Medium through which conflicts of interest are resolved. Sources of power:
    • Formal Authority
    • Control of Scarce Resources
    • Use of organizational structure, rules and regulations
    • Control of decision powers, knowledge and information, boundaries, and/or technology

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Relationship between Management and Workers
    Unitary
    • Organization is perceived as integrated, harmonious whole: e.g., “one happy family”, where

    management and other members of the staff all share a common purpose.
    • Emphasis on mutual cooperation.
    • May use paternalistic approach that demands loyalty of all employees, being predominantly

    managerial in its emphasis and application

    Pluralist
    • Organization is perceived as being composed of powerful and divergent sub-groups, each

    with its own loyalties and set of objectives and leaders.
    • Two predominant sub-groups in the pluralistic perspective are management and trade

    unions.

    Marxist or Radical
    • Looks at division of interest between capital and labor
    • Sees inequalities of power and economic wealth as inherent in capitalist economic system
    • Conflict is seen as inevitable, with trade unions a natural response of workers

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    Competing—to take quick, decisive action; for enforcing unpopular rules and decisions

    Collaborating—for synthesizing insights of different stakeholders; fostering
    organizational learning

    Compromising—to arrive at mutually acceptable, expedient solutions

    Avoiding—to buy time, or to put energy to more productive issues

    Accommodating—to satisfy others when issues are not paramount to you; to minimize
    loss when it’s clear you can’t win

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor
    Strengths
    • Surfaces taboo subject such as people pushing for their private motives
    • Recognizes role and use of power at the center of organizational analysis.
    • Challenges the myth of organizational rationality.
    • Helps us understand human behavior in organizations
    • Recognizes the socio-political implications of organizational dynamics and the roles

    that organizations play in society

    Limitations
    • Can lead to increased politicization of the organization
    • Focus on conflict and control may make it harder to see positive aspects of organizing

    and the potential for shared power to transform systems

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Political Systems��Morgan Ch. 6
    – Types of Political Systems
    – Organizations, Control, & Power
    – Interests, Conflict, & Power
    – Relationship between Management and Workers
    – Pluralist Ways to Handle Conflict
    – Strengths and Limitations of Political Metaphor

    **## OGL550_Module4_PsychicPrison.pdf**

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    OGL 550

    Organizations as
    Psychic Prisons
    Morgan Ch. 7

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Psychic Prison Metaphor
    “ Human beings have a knack for getting trapped in webs of their own creation.”

    This metaphor looks at organization as psychological phenomena, as being created and sustained
    by conscious and unconscious processes.

    Examines people as becoming imprisoned or confined by the images, ideas, thoughts and actions
    of psychological processes

    Considers human condition as potentially trapped in:
    • Modes of Thinking
    • Constructions of Perceived Reality that offer imperfect and incomplete grasp of the world
    • People may become “imprisoned”, “confined” or “controlled” by, or within, organizations

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Plato’s Cave Allegory
    • First exploration of Psychic Prison metaphor by Greek Philosopher Plato in his work “The Republic‟
    (c. 380 BC)

    • Prisoners were chained to an underground cave wall. They could not move, or view the outside world

    • Interpretation of shadows comprised their entire reality

    • A liberated prisoner discovered that the world beyond the shadows was richer, more complex &
    rewarding

    • Upon return to cave, his experiences terrified fellow cave dwellers

    • He could not remain & stagnate.

    • They could not change or move forward • They perceived him as “dangerous”

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Group Think
    • Described by Psychologist, Irving Janis in 1952

    • Organizational, social & cultural traps that inhibit problem solving by preventing recognition
    of alternate avenues of thought, discussion & action

    • Group illusions of invulnerability, morality & unanimity foster “assumed consensus” which
    inhibit expressions of doubt & engender misguided decision-making

    Examples

    • The Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961): President Kennedy & his advisors developed illusions of
    unanimity & invulnerability; doubts were inhibited & suppressed

    • The Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (1986): After 55 successful missions NASA felt
    invincible • Fatally ignored crucial warnings about faulty equipment

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Organizations and the Unconscious
    • Sigmund Freud argued that the unconscious is created as humans repress their inner-most desires

    and private thoughts.
    • Sees much visible culture as preoccupation & concerns of the unconscious psyche
    • People become psychic prisoners through repression of their unconscious desires & thoughts
    • We can try to understand & interpret these phenomena across dimensions that include: • Sexuality •

    Family Dynamics • Mortality • Anxiety • Artefacts (Objects & Symbols) • Shadows & Archetypes

    Examples:
    • Neurotic traits
    • Establishment of formal organizations, e.g. armies, religious orders, industrial society, bureaucracies
    • Creation of Scientific Management innovations, ideas, planning & productivity such as:
    • Historical replication of Patriarchal systems: authoritarian, aggressive & chauvinistic (negative) or

    brave, heroic & decisive (positive)
    • Matriarchal approach now seen as increasingly effective, empowering organizational trust, creativity &

    co-operation

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    For each psychic prison, ask yourself two questions:

    1.What is the dysfunctional story/myth?
    2. How does the story/myth control fear and anxiety?

    Example: Organization and Repressed Sexuality
    When leaders and workers have strong desires to control and become

    disciplined in every aspect of life. Taylor is exemplified by this Psychic Prison.

    Dysfunctional story: social order to maintained through discipline and control.

    How does story control fear? Tight supervision so there are no surprises.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Defense Mechanisms
    • Repression: “pushing down” unwanted impulses and ideas

    • Denial: refusal to acknowledge an impulse-evoking fact, feeling or memory

    • Displacement: shifting impulses aroused by one person or situation to a safer target

    • Fixation: rigid commitment to a particular attitude or behavior

    • Projection: attribution of one’s own feelings and impulses to others

    • Rationalization: creation of elaborate schemes of justification that disguise underlying
    motives and intentions

    • Idealization: playing up the good aspects of a situation to protect oneself from the bad

    • Splitting: isolating different elements of experience, often to protect the good from the
    bad.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    • (Re)producing organizational structure that gives dominance to males.
    • Culture in which white males rule the field and know best which decisions to make.
    • Competition, domination, and no emotions are cultural norms.
    • Dysfunctional story: White men are more effective leaders.
    • How does story control fear? Creates rigid structures and mental models the produce social control,

    giving a sense of stability and security.

    Patriarchal Family: prolonged dependency of the child upon the parents facilitates the kind of
    dependency institutionalized in the relationship between leaders and followers, and in the practice
    where people look to others to initiate action in response to problematic issues.

    Key organizational members also often cultivate fatherly roles by acting as mentors to those in need of
    help and protection. The psychic prison structure of the male-dominated family tends to create a
    feelings of impotence, accompanied by a fear of, and dependence on, authority.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Immortality and Death
    • Humans are afraid of dying. Death reminds us of our limitations and lack of control.
    • Organizations are a way to connect with something more enduring than our physical bodies.
    • Dysfunctional story : We won’t die if we are attached to something more enduring than ourselves.
    • How does the story control fear? When people believe they will endure, they are more likely to obey

    authority.

    Human beings, aware of the impermanence & vulnerability of life, use Organizations (through culture)
    to:

    • Search for meaning & permanency;
    • Preserve a sense of belonging & identity
    • Manage, organize & motivate themselves
    • Imagine the achievement of immortality through recorded beliefs, deeds, roles & material objects
    • As we invest ourselves in our work, our roles become our realities and sense of self.
    • Making the complex simple. We manage our world by simplifying it, because in making it simple we

    feel like we have control.

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    Dysfunctional story: World can be divided into good versus evil. Evil wishes to destroy us
    and we must survive it.

    To cope with anxiety:

    • we may depend on leader to control or save us

    • Make enemies even when there aren’t any (“othering”)

    • How does the story reduce fear? It draws the worker into the good/fear dichotomy and
    allows leaders to do what they want without protest

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    Organizations interpreted through Artifacts
    • “Transitional objects” (e. g. toys) & symbolic experiences help people cope with change. Gives

    people something else to hold onto while change occurs.
    • Over-reliance may facilitate resistance to progress (e. g. hoarding of objects), and block creativity &

    innovation in organizations
    • Dysfunctional story : Change is bad!
    • How does story control fear? If everything stays the same, we will not get harmed; the old and

    unchanging will keep us safe.

    Shadows & Archetypes:
    • View of human psyche espoused by psychiatrist Carl Jung
    • Archetypes (patterns & ideas) link the “collective unconscious” to individuals & perpetuate recurring

    organizational themes
    • Shadows: repressed & rival instincts of individuals compete to influence organizational decision-

    making

    Copyright © 2020 Arizona Board of Regents.

    Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor
    Strengths:
    • Assists understanding of Organizational change and why people resist it
    • Releases positive energies for transformation & integration
    • Surfaces links between irrational & rational, recognizes ethical dimensions
    • Offers holistic approach to organizational life

    Weaknesses
    • Neglects conscious ideological factors of organizational life
    • Over-emphasizes cognitive processes
    • Potential for “Orwellian” manipulation of the unconscious mind

    Conclusion
    • Draws from interdisciplinary theories from philosophy, organizational theory, psychiatry and

    psychology, sociology, cultural Studies & other fields
    • Offers profound psychological insights into the nature & complexity of organizations at both the

    unconscious & conscious level

    – OGL 550��Organizations as Psychic Prisons��Morgan Ch. 7
    – Psychic Prison Metaphor
    – Plato’s Cave Allegory
    – Group Think
    – Organizations and the Unconscious
    – Function: To Reduce/Hide Fear & Anxiety
    – Defense Mechanisms
    – Authoritarianism (e.g., Patriarchal Family)
    – Immortality and Death
    – Fear and Anxiety—Good and Evil
    – Transitional Objects, Shadows, & Archetypes
    – Strengths & Weakenesses of Psychic Prison Metaphor

    **toolsforanalyzingpower.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/toolsforanalyzingpower-pdf-10361089)

    **HBR_PowerandPoliticsinOrganizationalLife.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hbr-powerandpoliticsinorganizationallife-pdf-10361091)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5

  • [Solved] discussion post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Technology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    3 simple parts – ## EmergingTechnologiesEvaluation.pdf **## EmergingTechnologiesEvaluation.pdf** Evaluating Emerging Technology Objectives • Identify and select an emerging technology to evaluate. • Provide an overview of the emerging technology and its role/function in health care. • Analyze curren…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    3 simple parts

    – ## EmergingTechnologiesEvaluation.pdf

    **## EmergingTechnologiesEvaluation.pdf**

    Evaluating Emerging Technology

    Objectives

    • Identify and select an emerging technology to evaluate.
    • Provide an overview of the emerging technology and its role/function in health care.

    • Analyze current polices and regulation governing informatic and communication
    technologies.

    • Evaluate the emerging technology you selected and determine if the technology will
    achieve equitable care in an underserved population.

    Overview

    New health care innovations offer nurses an opportunity to apply emerging technologies in
    practice to improve quality and patient outcomes.

    The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the impact of an emerging technology and
    related regulations and policies on health care delivery and equitable care. Complete Parts I-
    III, as indicated below. Be concise but use complete sentences representative of scholarly
    writing.

    Part I: Evaluation of an Emerging Technology

    Provide an overview of an emerging technology and its role/function in health care.

    Describe an emerging
    technology. What is the
    current competition for this
    technology?

    Explain how the technology would enhance
    value, quality, and cost-effectiveness in health
    care.

    Explain how a nurse’s role incorporates
    informatics technology.

    Part II: Policies and Regulation

    Analyze (examine in detail) current polices and regulation governing informatic and communication technologies.

    Identify a policy (state or federal) and one regulation currently in
    place.

    Explain how the policy and regulation enhance value, quality,
    and cost-effectiveness in health care delivery.

    Policy:

    Regulation:

    In 250-350 words, explain how you would advocate for policies and regulations that support the appropriate use of technologies
    impacting health care.

    Part III: Equitable Care

    Select an underserved population. Using the emerging technology you selected, determine if the technology will achieve equitable
    care in an underserved population. Consider access, cost-effectiveness, care outcomes, and mitigating factors specific to your selected
    population in your analysis.

    Present your selected
    population and explain
    why it is considered an
    underserved population.

    Evaluate the emerging technology you
    selected and discuss what aspects must be
    considered to ensure equitable care for this
    population.

    Based on your overall analysis, describe which aspect
    would be the most critical priority for the population
    you selected (access, cost-effectiveness, care
    outcomes, and mitigating factors). Why is this the most
    critical priority?

    In 250-350 words, describe the type of resources and opportunities that would be required for your selected population to have the intended

    outcomes from the emerging technology.

    **## EmergingTechnologiesEvaluation.pdf**

    Evaluating Emerging Technology

    Objectives

    • Identify and select an emerging technology to evaluate.
    • Provide an overview of the emerging technology and its role/function in health care.

    • Analyze current polices and regulation governing informatic and communication
    technologies.

    • Evaluate the emerging technology you selected and determine if the technology will
    achieve equitable care in an underserved population.

    Overview

    New health care innovations offer nurses an opportunity to apply emerging technologies in
    practice to improve quality and patient outcomes.

    The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the impact of an emerging technology and
    related regulations and policies on health care delivery and equitable care. Complete Parts I-
    III, as indicated below. Be concise but use complete sentences representative of scholarly
    writing.

    Part I: Evaluation of an Emerging Technology

    Provide an overview of an emerging technology and its role/function in health care.

    Describe an emerging
    technology. What is the
    current competition for this
    technology?

    Explain how the technology would enhance
    value, quality, and cost-effectiveness in health
    care.

    Explain how a nurse’s role incorporates
    informatics technology.

    Part II: Policies and Regulation

    Analyze (examine in detail) current polices and regulation governing informatic and communication technologies.

    Identify a policy (state or federal) and one regulation currently in
    place.

    Explain how the policy and regulation enhance value, quality,
    and cost-effectiveness in health care delivery.

    Policy:

    Regulation:

    In 250-350 words, explain how you would advocate for policies and regulations that support the appropriate use of technologies
    impacting health care.

    Part III: Equitable Care

    Select an underserved population. Using the emerging technology you selected, determine if the technology will achieve equitable
    care in an underserved population. Consider access, cost-effectiveness, care outcomes, and mitigating factors specific to your selected
    population in your analysis.

    Present your selected
    population and explain
    why it is considered an
    underserved population.

    Evaluate the emerging technology you
    selected and discuss what aspects must be
    considered to ensure equitable care for this
    population.

    Based on your overall analysis, describe which aspect
    would be the most critical priority for the population
    you selected (access, cost-effectiveness, care
    outcomes, and mitigating factors). Why is this the most
    critical priority?

    In 250-350 words, describe the type of resources and opportunities that would be required for your selected population to have the intended

    outcomes from the emerging technology.

  • [Solved] Week 10 Discussion Response- Managing People and Promoting Collab

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Colleague 1** Taryn Casillo, One of the most difficult work-related decisions I have faced involved the handling of a disciplinary issue with a well-liked but underperforming team member. I was a supervisor at a community-based organization that provided support services for youth and families. On…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Colleague 1**
    Taryn Casillo,
    One of the most difficult work-related decisions I have faced involved the handling of a disciplinary issue with a well-liked but underperforming team member. I was a supervisor at a community-based organization that provided support services for youth and families. One of my case managers consistently missed documentation deadlines, despite repeated reminders and coaching. While their report with clients was excellent and they were known for going the extra mile in the field, their delays in entering case notes and progress reports put the agency’s compliance with funding requirements at risk. As a manager, I had to decide whether to initiate formal disciplinary action or continue informal coaching in hopes of improvement.
    The decision was not clear-cut. On one hand, enforcing accountability and protecting the organization’s integrity were essential. On the other hand, this employee’s strengths and community relationships were valuable, and I worried that disciplinary action might damage morale and client trust. I was also aware of external stressors in the employee’s life, including caregiving responsibilities for a parent, which complicated the situation further.
    To make my decision, I relied on three key sources: the agency’s employee handbook, which outlined progressive discipline procedures; the organization’s core values, which emphasized compassion and accountability; and my own ethical code, which stresses fairness, transparency, and respect. I chose to issue a formal written warning, with a clear improvement plan and support measures, including adjusted caseload and flexible time for documentation. I explained my decision in a one-on-one meeting, focusing on the shared goal of protecting client services and the employee’s future with the agency.
    Reflecting on this decision now, and considering the ethical leadership resources provided this week, I believe I made the right choice but would enhance my approach if faced with a similar situation again. Kouchaki and Smith (2020) emphasize the importance of building moral awareness and courage—qualities I drew upon when addressing a popular employee’s performance without bias. However, if I had the opportunity again, I would engage a peer supervisor or HR partner earlier in the process to gain a broader perspective and reduce the emotional weight of the decision.
    According to the _Ethics Defined_ video (McCombs School of Business, 2018), ethics involve “deciding what is right” rather than what is easy or popular. Additionally, Seidman (2017) highlights “truth, transparency, responsibility, and purpose” as the four pillars of moral leadership. I now understand that integrating these principles proactively—rather than reactively—can prevent tough situations from escalating. As a result, I plan to cultivate clearer expectations, provide more consistent feedback, and lead with both empathy and structure in the future.
    In conclusion, this experience reminded me that ethical leadership requires balance: compassion and accountability, between individual needs and organizational goals. It’s not always comfortable, but with strong values and a clear process, ethical decisions can become leadership moments that strengthen both the team and the mission.
    **References**
    Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2020). Building an ethical career. _Harvard Business Review_, 98(1), 135–139.
    McCombs School of Business. (2018, December 18). _Ethics defined: Ethics_ [Video]. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vWXpzlL7Mo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vWXpzlL7Mo)
    [Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vWXpzlL7Mo) ![A black and grey play button AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/week-10-discussion-response-managing-people-and-promoting-collab)Seidman, D. (2017). The four pillars of moral leadership. _Fortune, 176_(4), 90–92.
    **Colleague 2**
    Alexis Rubin,
    When I was working as a project coordinator in a previous role, I had to make an uncomfortable decision on whether to comply with a request made by my manager to reassign people working on a current project to a new project with a better profile. Although the reassignment might have brought some credit to the group and might have enabled our department to maintain its image amongst the top management, it had the potential to set back the initial project and lost credibility to us in the eyes of a retained customer. It was complex ethically because there was no definite right answer among the options that were given.
    In making my decision, I applied two of my values as well as the company code of conduct, that is, qualities of integrity and accountability. Ethical leadership implies that it is crucial always to consider core values when making decisions instead of short-term benefits, as Kouchaki and Smith (2020) explain. I also used the competing values framework by Quinn et al. (2021), which focuses on the balance between results and long-term relationships. Consulting our client-facing policies, as well as involving the affected team members, I offered to implement a partial reassignment plan that would enable the new project to go live despite retaining the team members sufficiently to achieve the current deadlines.
    In the event of the same scenario today, I would be different in approach, but much to do with transparent communication. Kuligowski (2020) points out that ethical leaders actively engage the stakeholders to reduce the risks of misunderstandings and to establish trust. The decision would also be formalized in a way to present the organizational values as affecting the decision-making process, since it would also be clear and accountable. This experience confirmed once again that strategic thinking alone is not sufficient to make tough decisions that need an ethical commitment. Establishing integrity as the baseline to build on, and consultations with fellow team members, managers will be able to manage competing priorities and offer trust without compromising professional credibility.
    **References**
    Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2020). Building an ethical career. _Harvard Business Review, 98_(1), 135–139.
    Kuligowski, K. (2023, October 23). _How to be an ethical Leader: 10 tips for success_. Business News Daily. [https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5537-how-to-be-ethical-leader.htmlLinks to an external site.](https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5537-how-to-be-ethical-leader.html)
    Quinn, R. E., Bright, D. S., & Sturm, R. E. (2021). _Becoming a master manager: A competing values approach_ (7th ed.). Wiley.

  • [Solved] genderf

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Answer the Question (approx. 3 sentences) Construction of Gender. In the readings and media thus far, what stands out to you when it comes to this topic? \ lovinginthewaryears.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lovinginthewaryears-pdf "lovinginthewaryears.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Answer the Question  (approx. 3 sentences)
    Construction of Gender. In the readings and media thus far, what stands out to you when it comes to this topic?
    \
    lovinginthewaryears.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lovinginthewaryears-pdf "lovinginthewaryears.pdf")

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    DISCUSSION 1 In this module, you will be exposed to topics that include social cognition and social learning. Throughout your life experience, you are constantly challenged to consider the world within and the world outside of you. The world within is characterized by your thoughts, assumptions, and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    DISCUSSION 1
    In this module, you will be exposed to topics that include social cognition and social learning. Throughout your life experience, you are constantly challenged to consider the world within and the world outside of you. The world within is characterized by your thoughts, assumptions, and attitudes; the outside world can present you with behaviors of others that are different from your own. Your behavior can be influenced by both your internal mental processes and your observations of others in the world.
    We will explore your experiences with social and cognitive learning theory. To complete this discussion, use your textbook reading assigned in this module, as well as your life experience. Your response to each bullet below should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.
    For your initial post, answer the following questions:
    – What is an example of behavior modeling that you have experienced in your personal or professional life? Describe the behavior that was modeled and imitated. You can provide an example where your behavior was influenced or you influenced the behavior of someone else.
    – What were the consequences of that behavior? Were there any unintended consequences?
    – To what extent should anyone be mindful of or responsible for the influence of their behavior on others? Use an example to explain your response.
    – What was the relationship between the subject modeling the behavior and the subject imitating it? Why is that significant?
    – Select one of the following questions to answer that relates to the example you provide:
    – How do mental processes manifest in the behavior you identified in your example? How do cognitive and social cognitive theory relate to your example?
    – Did it provide order or clarity about yourself, others, or the world? How do cognition or personal constructs relate to your example?
    – Did it model an emotional response? How does cognitive theory relate to your example?
    – Explain the synergy between thoughts and behaviors in your example.
    Finally, describe how studying behaviorism connects to one of the following programmatic themes:
    – Self-care
    – Social justice
    – Emotional intelligence
    – Career connections
    – Ethics
    DISCUSSION 2
    This short paper will explore the benefits of having technologies/systems in place to provide more in-depth information that will help drive decision making.
    The information that is gathered every day in healthcare drives patient care and the improvement of the quality of care. Each staff member within a healthcare institution has a role in improving patient care. In this short paper, complete the following:
    1. Choose one of the following **managers**:
    – Director of Admissions
    – Manager of Billing
    – Director of Nursing
    – Manager of Purchasing
    – Chief of Medicine
    2. Considering what you have learned about these types of managers thus far and doing additional researching as necessary, answer the following:
    – How might the manager for whichever department you chose above use technology/systems to improve **patient care**? To minimize **costs and** maximize **efficiency**? If you are having trouble, think generally here about how technology improves record keeping, and then consider the type of data these managers and directors have to manage.
    – How does the system that the manager uses drive the **decision making** within the institution?
    Support your answer with relevant sources.
    ## What to Submit
    The short paper should be submitted as a Word document and should be a minimum of 2 pages in length. All sources should be cited using APA style.

  • [Solved] case study group project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. **Case Study: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/how-we-help-clients/rewired-in-action/aviva-rewiring-the-insurance-claims-journey-with-ai** 2. **Article:** [https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/case-studies/adding-a-powerful-new-tool-to-the-field-mechanics-t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. **Case Study: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/how-we-help-clients/rewired-in-action/aviva-rewiring-the-insurance-claims-journey-with-ai**
    2. **Article:** [https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/case-studies/adding-a-powerful-new-tool-to-the-field-mechanics-toolbelt-ai](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/case-studies/adding-a-powerful-new-tool-to-the-field-mechanics-toolbelt-ai)
    3. **Article:** [https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/case-studies/how-a-uae-bank-transformed-to-lead-with-ai-and-advanced-analytics](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/case-studies/how-a-uae-bank-transformed-to-lead-with-ai-and-advanced-analytics)
    4. [**"Aviva: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/how-we-help-clients/rewired-in-action/aviva-rewiring-the-insurance-claims-journey-with-ai**](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/how-we-help-clients/rewired-in-action/aviva-rewiring-the-insurance-claims-journey-with-ai "Link") **"** – This McKinsey case study explores how Aviva has integrated AI to enhance its claims process, resulting in faster and more accurate settlements, and improved customer outcomes.
    5. [**"Aviva partners with Tractable to bring the benefits of AI to motor claims"**https://www.aviva.com/newsroom/news-releases/2022/04/aviva-partners-with-tractable-to-bring-the-benefits-of-ai-to-motor-claims/](https://www.aviva.com/newsroom/news-releases/2022/04/aviva-partners-with-tractable-to-bring-the-benefits-of-ai-to-motor-claims "Link")– This press release details Aviva's collaboration with Tractable to utilize AI for improving the efficiency and accuracy of motor claim assessments in the UK.
    6. **"** [**AI and advanced analytics transforming insurance claims handling"https://www.insurancetimes.co.uk/news/ai-and-advanced-analytics-transforming-insurance-claims-handling-aviva/1445428.article.**](https://www.insurancetimes.co.uk/news/ai-and-advanced-analytics-transforming-insurance-claims-handling-aviva/1445428.article) – This article discusses how Aviva employs AI and advanced analytics to enhance the efficiency and convenience of handling insurance claims.
    \
    Groupcontribution-Aviva.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/groupcontribution-aviva-docx "Groupcontribution-Aviva.docx")
    \
    Groupcontributiondraft1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/groupcontributiondraft1-docx "Groupcontributiondraft1.docx")
    \
    IS501_Team4_FinalProject_ExpandedDraft_Revised_NoYinxiao-Draft1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/is501-team4-finalproject-expandeddraft-revised-noyinxiao-draft1-docx "IS501_Team4_FinalProject_ExpandedDraft_Revised_NoYinxiao-Draft1.docx")

  • [Solved] Coding

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please refer to attachments – ## CodingAssignment2.pdf – ## CodingAssignment.docx **## CodingAssignment2.pdf** Coding Assignment Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm Points 5 Submitting a file upload Coding Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Code Book Completed 1 pts Analysis of the Data 1 pts Start Assignment…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please refer to attachments

    – ## CodingAssignment2.pdf

    – ## CodingAssignment.docx

    **## CodingAssignment2.pdf**

    Coding Assignment

    Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
    Points 5
    Submitting a file upload

    Coding Assignment Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Code Book
    Completed

    1 pts

    Analysis of
    the Data

    1 pts

    Start Assignment

    Coding Assignment: Instructions

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
    analyzing qualitative data.

    Instructions:

    1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
    2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
    3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet

    peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
    paragraphs.

    4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
    a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
    assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    All relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Most relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    No codes identified/
    assignment not turned in.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is relevant to the
    codes identified.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is mostly relevant
    to the codes identified.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Analysis does not consider
    the codes and does not
    provide any insight into the
    data.

    Description
    of the Data 1 pts

    Organization

    1 pts

    Mechanics
    & Grammar

    1 pts

    Total Points: 5

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Description of the data
    provided in a minimum of
    3-4 paragraphs.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Description of the data
    provided in less than 3-4
    paragraphs.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Description of the data is
    weak or is not included.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Assignment is organized
    using the Code Book
    Template and has a logical
    flow.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Assignment does not use
    the template or is
    unorganized.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Assignment was not
    submitted or does not
    include any information.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Presents information using
    clear and concise
    language in an organized
    manner with no
    grammatical errors.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Presents information in an
    organized manner with few
    grammatical errors.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Presents information that
    is not clear, logical,
    professional, or organized
    that the reader has
    difficulty understanding
    and contains numerous
    grammatical errors.

    **## CodingAssignment.docx**

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.

    **To complete this assignment**, you need the
    **three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.

    **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
    **|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
    **|** ).

    **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.

    **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.

    ## **Example**

    Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:

    186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
    **|**
    Lack of feedback.

    **ID**

    First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.

    **Codes**

    Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.

    **Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**

    The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).

    In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.

    Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
    | 186 | 08 | 13 | |

    You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**

    001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
    **|**
    Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
    **|**
    Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.

    002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
    **|**
    Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.

    003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.

    004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.

    005 Students who use the classroom to show how
    **smart** they are and to
    **build** themselves up.
    **|**
    Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.

    006 When required readings are not available.
    **|**
    When instructors put-down students.
    **|**
    When assignments are too difficult.

    007 Professor who believe their view is the
    **only** one acceptable.
    **|** Disorganized classes.
    **|** Dry readings.

    008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
    **|** Test questions that come out of the blue.

    009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
    **|** When people monopolize class.

    010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
    **|** When expectations for grades are unclear.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Course Requirements**

    **01** = Can’t locate required readings

    **02** =
    _Unclear_ expectations of students

    **03** =
    _Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)

    **04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)

    **05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus

    **Course Content**

    **06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)

    **07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content

    **08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)

    **09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics

    **Teacher – Student Relationship**

    **10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own

    **11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)

    **12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)

    **Teaching Behavior**

    **13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)

    **14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)

    **15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)

    **16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions

    **Student Behavior**

    **17** = Students who monopolize class time

    **18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)

    **19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates

    **20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students

    **21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)

    **98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme

    **99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
    | 001 | | | |
    | 002 | | | |
    | 003 | | | |
    | 004 | | | |
    | 005 | | | |
    | 006 | | | |
    | 007 | | | |
    | 008 | | | |
    | 009 | | | |
    | 010 | | | |

    After you complete the code sheet,
    **summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:

    **## CodingAssignment.docx**

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.

    **To complete this assignment**, you need the
    **three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.

    **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
    **|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
    **|** ).

    **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.

    **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.

    ## **Example**

    Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:

    186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
    **|**
    Lack of feedback.

    **ID**

    First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.

    **Codes**

    Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.

    **Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**

    The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).

    In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.

    Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
    | 186 | 08 | 13 | |

    You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**

    001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
    **|**
    Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
    **|**
    Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.

    002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
    **|**
    Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.

    003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.

    004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.

    005 Students who use the classroom to show how
    **smart** they are and to
    **build** themselves up.
    **|**
    Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.

    006 When required readings are not available.
    **|**
    When instructors put-down students.
    **|**
    When assignments are too difficult.

    007 Professor who believe their view is the
    **only** one acceptable.
    **|** Disorganized classes.
    **|** Dry readings.

    008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
    **|** Test questions that come out of the blue.

    009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
    **|** When people monopolize class.

    010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
    **|** When expectations for grades are unclear.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Course Requirements**

    **01** = Can’t locate required readings

    **02** =
    _Unclear_ expectations of students

    **03** =
    _Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)

    **04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)

    **05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus

    **Course Content**

    **06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)

    **07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content

    **08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)

    **09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics

    **Teacher – Student Relationship**

    **10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own

    **11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)

    **12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)

    **Teaching Behavior**

    **13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)

    **14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)

    **15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)

    **16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions

    **Student Behavior**

    **17** = Students who monopolize class time

    **18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)

    **19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates

    **20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students

    **21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)

    **98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme

    **99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
    | 001 | | | |
    | 002 | | | |
    | 003 | | | |
    | 004 | | | |
    | 005 | | | |
    | 006 | | | |
    | 007 | | | |
    | 008 | | | |
    | 009 | | | |
    | 010 | | | |

    After you complete the code sheet,
    **summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:

    **## CodingAssignment2.pdf**

    Coding Assignment

    Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
    Points 5
    Submitting a file upload

    Coding Assignment Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Code Book
    Completed

    1 pts

    Analysis of
    the Data

    1 pts

    Start Assignment

    Coding Assignment: Instructions

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
    analyzing qualitative data.

    Instructions:

    1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
    2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
    3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet

    peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
    paragraphs.

    4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
    a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
    assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    All relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Most relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    No codes identified/
    assignment not turned in.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is relevant to the
    codes identified.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is mostly relevant
    to the codes identified.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Analysis does not consider
    the codes and does not
    provide any insight into the
    data.

    Description
    of the Data 1 pts

    Organization

    1 pts

    Mechanics
    & Grammar

    1 pts

    Total Points: 5

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Description of the data
    provided in a minimum of
    3-4 paragraphs.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Description of the data
    provided in less than 3-4
    paragraphs.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Description of the data is
    weak or is not included.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Assignment is organized
    using the Code Book
    Template and has a logical
    flow.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Assignment does not use
    the template or is
    unorganized.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Assignment was not
    submitted or does not
    include any information.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Presents information using
    clear and concise
    language in an organized
    manner with no
    grammatical errors.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Presents information in an
    organized manner with few
    grammatical errors.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Presents information that
    is not clear, logical,
    professional, or organized
    that the reader has
    difficulty understanding
    and contains numerous
    grammatical errors.

    **## CodingAssignment.docx**

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.

    **To complete this assignment**, you need the
    **three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.

    **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
    **|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
    **|** ).

    **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.

    **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.

    ## **Example**

    Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:

    186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
    **|**
    Lack of feedback.

    **ID**

    First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.

    **Codes**

    Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.

    **Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**

    The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).

    In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.

    Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
    | 186 | 08 | 13 | |

    You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**

    001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
    **|**
    Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
    **|**
    Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.

    002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
    **|**
    Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.

    003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.

    004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.

    005 Students who use the classroom to show how
    **smart** they are and to
    **build** themselves up.
    **|**
    Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.

    006 When required readings are not available.
    **|**
    When instructors put-down students.
    **|**
    When assignments are too difficult.

    007 Professor who believe their view is the
    **only** one acceptable.
    **|** Disorganized classes.
    **|** Dry readings.

    008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
    **|** Test questions that come out of the blue.

    009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
    **|** When people monopolize class.

    010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
    **|** When expectations for grades are unclear.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Course Requirements**

    **01** = Can’t locate required readings

    **02** =
    _Unclear_ expectations of students

    **03** =
    _Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)

    **04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)

    **05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus

    **Course Content**

    **06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)

    **07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content

    **08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)

    **09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics

    **Teacher – Student Relationship**

    **10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own

    **11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)

    **12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)

    **Teaching Behavior**

    **13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)

    **14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)

    **15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)

    **16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions

    **Student Behavior**

    **17** = Students who monopolize class time

    **18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)

    **19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates

    **20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students

    **21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)

    **98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme

    **99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
    | 001 | | | |
    | 002 | | | |
    | 003 | | | |
    | 004 | | | |
    | 005 | | | |
    | 006 | | | |
    | 007 | | | |
    | 008 | | | |
    | 009 | | | |
    | 010 | | | |

    After you complete the code sheet,
    **summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:

    **## CodingAssignment2.pdf**

    Coding Assignment

    Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
    Points 5
    Submitting a file upload

    Coding Assignment Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Code Book
    Completed

    1 pts

    Analysis of
    the Data

    1 pts

    Start Assignment

    Coding Assignment: Instructions

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
    analyzing qualitative data.

    Instructions:

    1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
    2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
    3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet

    peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
    paragraphs.

    4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
    a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
    assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    All relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Most relevant codes were
    identified for the code
    book.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    No codes identified/
    assignment not turned in.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is relevant to the
    codes identified.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Analysis of the pertinent
    findings is mostly relevant
    to the codes identified.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Analysis does not consider
    the codes and does not
    provide any insight into the
    data.

    Description
    of the Data 1 pts

    Organization

    1 pts

    Mechanics
    & Grammar

    1 pts

    Total Points: 5

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Description of the data
    provided in a minimum of
    3-4 paragraphs.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Description of the data
    provided in less than 3-4
    paragraphs.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Description of the data is
    weak or is not included.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Assignment is organized
    using the Code Book
    Template and has a logical
    flow.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Assignment does not use
    the template or is
    unorganized.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Assignment was not
    submitted or does not
    include any information.

    1 pts
    Proficient

    Presents information using
    clear and concise
    language in an organized
    manner with no
    grammatical errors.

    0.5 pts
    Acceptable

    Presents information in an
    organized manner with few
    grammatical errors.

    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory

    Presents information that
    is not clear, logical,
    professional, or organized
    that the reader has
    difficulty understanding
    and contains numerous
    grammatical errors.

    **## CodingAssignment.docx**

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.

    **To complete this assignment**, you need the
    **three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.

    **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
    **|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
    **|** ).

    **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.

    **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.

    ## **Example**

    Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:

    186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
    **|**
    Lack of feedback.

    **ID**

    First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.

    **Codes**

    Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.

    **Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**

    The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).

    In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.

    Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
    | 186 | 08 | 13 | |

    You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**

    001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
    **|**
    Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
    **|**
    Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.

    002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
    **|**
    Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.

    003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.

    004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.

    005 Students who use the classroom to show how
    **smart** they are and to
    **build** themselves up.
    **|**
    Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.

    006 When required readings are not available.
    **|**
    When instructors put-down students.
    **|**
    When assignments are too difficult.

    007 Professor who believe their view is the
    **only** one acceptable.
    **|** Disorganized classes.
    **|** Dry readings.

    008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
    **|** Test questions that come out of the blue.

    009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
    **|** When people monopolize class.

    010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
    **|** When expectations for grades are unclear.

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Course Requirements**

    **01** = Can’t locate required readings

    **02** =
    _Unclear_ expectations of students

    **03** =
    _Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)

    **04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)

    **05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus

    **Course Content**

    **06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)

    **07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content

    **08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)

    **09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics

    **Teacher – Student Relationship**

    **10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own

    **11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)

    **12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)

    **Teaching Behavior**

    **13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)

    **14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)

    **15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)

    **16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions

    **Student Behavior**

    **17** = Students who monopolize class time

    **18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)

    **19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates

    **20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students

    **21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)

    **98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme

    **99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response

    ## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**

    ## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**

    **Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
    | 001 | | | |
    | 002 | | | |
    | 003 | | | |
    | 004 | | | |
    | 005 | | | |
    | 006 | | | |
    | 007 | | | |
    | 008 | | | |
    | 009 | | | |
    | 010 | | | |

    After you complete the code sheet,
    **summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] IHP 630 Module 7 Activity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering IHP 630 Module 7 Activity.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.