Executive Solution Overview
Look into the attached and also i attached the mid terms assignment for references – ## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf – ## CRKC5002Assessment__11.docx – CSR.pptx – Appendix-3c.pdf **## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf** A…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Look into the attached and also i attached the mid terms assignment for references
– ## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf
– ## CRKC5002Assessment__11.docx
– CSR.pptx
– Appendix-3c.pdf
**## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf**
ABDULAZIZ ALRASHIDI GRADE REPORT (#479810)
Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice – Interim
Assignment
Your Assignment
CRKC5004 – Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice
Your Interim Assignment – Note this is only feedback: this assignment DOES NOT carry a
mark
What you have done well:
• The paper was presented appropriately
• You covered most of the questions
• You have given definitions of sustainability
• You have provided a context for your discussion
• You have supported arguments with reference to theory
• There is a list of references that have been cited in the text
What you could improve: –
• This is a thoughtful and well presented response, and I don't see a lot more that
you could do within the word limit, but do watch the spelling and the English in order to
maintain the confidence of the reader
Don’t forget that to complete the assignment you need to comment on other submissions.
Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia’s Esports and Gaming Industry
Working Definition of Sustainability
To me, sustainability in the context of esports and gaming means creating a digital
entertainment ecosystem that can thrive long-term by balancing economic growth,
cultural relevance, and community well-being. I arrived at this view by examining how
global sustainability principles — such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) —
can be adapted to a rapidly growing digital sector, especially in a country like Saudi
Arabia, where national strategies (like Vision 2030) aim to diversify the economy and
empower youth.
In esports, sustainability goes beyond environmental considerations. It includes equitable
access to technology and opportunities, long-term talent development, gender inclusion,
infrastructure investment, and ethical digital engagement. These elements form the
foundation for a vibrant, future-proof industry.
Supporting Ideas with References
Saudi Arabia’s efforts in the esports and gaming space reflect a deep commitment to
sustainable development. The Saudi Esports Federation (SEF), launched in 2017, has been
central in fostering an ecosystem that promotes professional growth, international
collaboration, and youth engagement. One example is the SEF Arena, opened in Riyadh,
the largest gaming venue of its kind globally, providing not only infrastructure but also
community-driven, long-term platforms for talent and innovation (Saudi Arabia Breaking
News, 2025).
Similarly, the Esports World Cup Foundation (EWCF)’s Club Support Program shows a
model of financial and competitive sustainability. It offers up to $1 million in funding to
top-tier esports clubs to help them expand, compete globally, and engage fans in more
meaningful ways. This initiative reflects how institutional support can ensure industry
resilience and global positioning (Esports World Cup, 2025).
From an economic sustainability standpoint, Savvy Games Group, a Public Investment
Fund subsidiary, has committed over $38 billion in global gaming investments. These
include studio acquisitions, partnerships, and local development, with a strong focus on
creating jobs, intellectual property, and economic diversification (AGBI, 2025). This
approach blends national development goals with global gaming growth, ensuring long-
term return and industry vitality.
Contextual Understanding
This discussion is set within the socio-economic and cultural transformation of Saudi
Arabia, where over 60% of the population is under 30. The government’s Vision 2030 is
actively reshaping the economy away from oil dependency and toward tech, tourism, and
entertainment. Esports is a strategic pillar of this change. It aligns with local culture —
where digital gaming is immensely popular — while also introducing global
competitiveness and professionalism.
Personal Reflection and Future Actions
Understanding how Saudi Arabia is embedding sustainability in its gaming and esports
development motivates me to be more conscious of my own role. As a student and
potential future professional in this sector, I aim to:
– Promote digital inclusion by supporting grassroots gaming communities.
– Advocate for ethical and inclusive content creation.
– Engage in research or volunteer opportunities within SEF or Savvy to contribute to their
mission.
Ultimately, I see esports not just as entertainment, but as a tool for sustainable national
development, and I intend to be part of shaping that future responsibly.
References
AGBI, 2025. Savvy Games Group Overview. [online] Available at:
https://www.agbi.com/companies/savvy-games-group/
Esports World Cup, 2025. Club Partner Program Announcement. [online] Available at:
https://esportsworldcup.com/en/news/ewcf-club-partner-program-2025
Saudi Arabia Breaking News, 2025. Saudi Esports Federation Launches SEF Arena: The
World’s Largest Gaming and Esports Zone. [online] Available at: https://www.saudiarabia
breakingnews.com/post/saudi-esports-federation-launches-sef-arena-the-world-s-largest-
gaming-and-esports-zone
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)
**## CRKC5002Assessment__11.docx**
CRKC5002 Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainability in Practice
Interim Assignment and Final Assessment
University of Cumbria and Robert Kennedy College
**General Instructions – Please read carefully**
You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
In addition, by the end of Unit 3 you must upload a paper that will consolidate your learning from the first three units and prepare you for the final assessment (see
_Interim Assignment_, on the final page of this document). This paper will not be graded, but it is an important way of monitoring your progress and preparing you for the final assessment.
Your paper must have a clear structure and include:
· Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4)
· Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
· A declaration of authenticity – confirming that you are the sole author of the assessment and that you have acknowledged all of your sources
· List of References cited in the text – you must use in-text citations to support your information and arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. You are required to use the Harvard system for this.
You should read the criteria for assessment section below carefully to ensure that within your assessment you have addressed all of the issues for which marks are available.
Your word count, excluding cover page, abstract, table of contents and reference list
**no more than 3000 words in total.** UoC have strict regulations regarding word limits – the penalties for exceeding them are set out in section 3
[HERE](https://www.cumbria.ac.uk/media/university-of-cumbria-website/content-assets/public/aqs/documents/academicregulations/Appendix-3c.pdf)
You must submit your work by 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of the module. UoC have strict regulations for submission of work, and the penalties for late submission are set out in section 2 of the link above.
**Submissions for the final assessment should be machine readable and in MS-Word readable formats only please don’t use pdf or other formats. submit only one file, and include any Excel analysis as images, not embedded files**
Please ask any questions about the interim assignment and final assessment in the Forum.
**Final Assessment**
The assessment in the module is by a portfolio, in which you submit various elements of your work through the course of the module, to help you provide a complete picture of your development and achievement.
Your portfolio should include:
· An analysis of the nature of sustainability and its importance to global economy, social wellbeing, and the environment of the planet.
(about 750 words)
· A review and evaluation of the role of stakeholders who influence the actions of businesses – you may choose more than one context to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· A discussion and analysis of the role of ethics and morals in modern business practice – you may choose specific contexts to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· USING CASE STUDIES OF YOUR CHOICE, an analysis and comparison of the issues faced and the actions taken by AT LEAST TWO businesses or organisations
(about 1250 words)
Apply as many of the concepts covered in this module as you can.
The number of words suggested are for guidance only – the important issue is that you do not exceed the overall word limit – but you should bear in mind that you need to address ALL of the criteria listed below within this word limit, and that those criteria DO NOT perfectly match the tasks for your assignment. Failure to address criteria will mean no marks can be awarded for that element of the assessment.
**Criteria for assessment:**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **First >70%** | **2:i 60-69%** | **2:ii 50-59%** | **Pass 40- 49%** | **Fail < 40%** |
| Analyse key contemporary sustainability, responsibility, and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and critical assessment of a full range of relevant issues in clearly defined and appropriate contexts | Good critical assessment of a good range of relevant issues in appropriate contexts | Competent assessment of most important issues in appropriate context | Clear understanding, but limited assessment an of issues with limited application to appropriate context | Little or no understanding or assessment of issues and/or failure to apply to appropriate context |
| Investigate a range of sustainability and responsibility challenges and dilemmas experienced by business and other organisations<br>**20% of Marks** | Sophisticated reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Appropriate reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | An understanding of and some reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Limited reflection on and/or limited understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation. | Little or no reflection on and/or complete lack of understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation |
| Analyse ethical theories and practice (deontology, consequentialism, virtue etc.)<br>**20% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s0 | Sound and detailed evaluation of ethical theories and practice in = appropriate context(s) | Appropriate evaluation of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s) | Limited evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice in justifiable context(s) | Little or no evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice and/or application to inappropriate context(s) |
| Compare the complexities comprising organisational cases in the field of sustainability, responsibility and ethics<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Full analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Adequate analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Limited analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics that demonstrates understanding of the main issues | Little or no analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics and/or little understanding of the issues involved |
| Present a paper using language, referencing and presentation that maintains the confidence of the reader in your academic credibility<br>**10% of Marks** | Fully and appropriately referenced, well presented. Excellent use of language.<br>Meets all academic conventions.<br>Bibliography accurate. | Very good referencing, well presented and clear use of language and sound use of academic conventions.<br>Bibliography some minor errors | Generally well referenced, well presented and clear use of language but with some errors in academic conventions.<br>Bibliography<br>Some errors and omissions | Inadequately presented with inconsistent academic conventions. Poor use of language.<br>Bibliography major errors and omissions | Little referenced work, poorly presented and very unclear language with serious errors.<br>Does not meet academic conventions.<br>Bibliography very poor, inaccurate, incomplete or not |
| | | | | | |
**SCROLL TO NEXT PAGE FOR INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**
| |
| — |
| **INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**<br>The Interim, formative assignment will consist of an individual submission of about 500 words in the Class Forum (initially visible only to you and the tutor); this is not graded, and can be amended subsequently to form part of your final assessment. <br>After you have submitted your formative assignment you will be able to see other students’ submissions, and you are expected to make general critical comments (of both a positive and negative nature) throughout the forum discussions. The tutor will also give general feedback on these postings, and by participating in the asynchronous class forums you can gather continuous feedback that can be directly applied to your summative assessment.<br>For this formative assignment you are required to write about 500 words on YOUR understanding of the meaning of sustainable development in the context of your choice. This can be at any scale – from the global to the individual – and in any context. <br>The assignment must be submitted no later than 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of module 3<br>In these 500 words you should<br>· Provide YOUR working definition of sustainability – with an explanation of how you have reached this view<br>· Support the information you give and the ideas you use by references to appropriate sources<br>· Make clear the context of your discussion (in terms of country, culture, economic development, scale – as appropriate)<br>· Conclude with how YOU, in the light of your discussion, intent behaving in future.<br>It goes without saying that this must be your own work, due attention must be given to referencing the sources of your ideas and information – and remember that copying large sections of a source is NOT acceptable, even if you acknowledge its source. Refer to the University resource <br>[HERE](https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/Student-Life/Learning/Skills-Cumbria/Referencing-and-Avoiding-Plagiarism/) if you are in any doubt. <br> <br>NOT |
## image1.png
## image2.png
**CSR.pptx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/csr-pptx-10360655)
**Appendix-3c.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendix-3c-pdf)
**Appendix-3c.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendix-3c-pdf)
**## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf**
ABDULAZIZ ALRASHIDI GRADE REPORT (#479810)
Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice – Interim
Assignment
Your Assignment
CRKC5004 – Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice
Your Interim Assignment – Note this is only feedback: this assignment DOES NOT carry a
mark
What you have done well:
• The paper was presented appropriately
• You covered most of the questions
• You have given definitions of sustainability
• You have provided a context for your discussion
• You have supported arguments with reference to theory
• There is a list of references that have been cited in the text
What you could improve: –
• This is a thoughtful and well presented response, and I don't see a lot more that
you could do within the word limit, but do watch the spelling and the English in order to
maintain the confidence of the reader
Don’t forget that to complete the assignment you need to comment on other submissions.
Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia’s Esports and Gaming Industry
Working Definition of Sustainability
To me, sustainability in the context of esports and gaming means creating a digital
entertainment ecosystem that can thrive long-term by balancing economic growth,
cultural relevance, and community well-being. I arrived at this view by examining how
global sustainability principles — such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) —
can be adapted to a rapidly growing digital sector, especially in a country like Saudi
Arabia, where national strategies (like Vision 2030) aim to diversify the economy and
empower youth.
In esports, sustainability goes beyond environmental considerations. It includes equitable
access to technology and opportunities, long-term talent development, gender inclusion,
infrastructure investment, and ethical digital engagement. These elements form the
foundation for a vibrant, future-proof industry.
Supporting Ideas with References
Saudi Arabia’s efforts in the esports and gaming space reflect a deep commitment to
sustainable development. The Saudi Esports Federation (SEF), launched in 2017, has been
central in fostering an ecosystem that promotes professional growth, international
collaboration, and youth engagement. One example is the SEF Arena, opened in Riyadh,
the largest gaming venue of its kind globally, providing not only infrastructure but also
community-driven, long-term platforms for talent and innovation (Saudi Arabia Breaking
News, 2025).
Similarly, the Esports World Cup Foundation (EWCF)’s Club Support Program shows a
model of financial and competitive sustainability. It offers up to $1 million in funding to
top-tier esports clubs to help them expand, compete globally, and engage fans in more
meaningful ways. This initiative reflects how institutional support can ensure industry
resilience and global positioning (Esports World Cup, 2025).
From an economic sustainability standpoint, Savvy Games Group, a Public Investment
Fund subsidiary, has committed over $38 billion in global gaming investments. These
include studio acquisitions, partnerships, and local development, with a strong focus on
creating jobs, intellectual property, and economic diversification (AGBI, 2025). This
approach blends national development goals with global gaming growth, ensuring long-
term return and industry vitality.
Contextual Understanding
This discussion is set within the socio-economic and cultural transformation of Saudi
Arabia, where over 60% of the population is under 30. The government’s Vision 2030 is
actively reshaping the economy away from oil dependency and toward tech, tourism, and
entertainment. Esports is a strategic pillar of this change. It aligns with local culture —
where digital gaming is immensely popular — while also introducing global
competitiveness and professionalism.
Personal Reflection and Future Actions
Understanding how Saudi Arabia is embedding sustainability in its gaming and esports
development motivates me to be more conscious of my own role. As a student and
potential future professional in this sector, I aim to:
– Promote digital inclusion by supporting grassroots gaming communities.
– Advocate for ethical and inclusive content creation.
– Engage in research or volunteer opportunities within SEF or Savvy to contribute to their
mission.
Ultimately, I see esports not just as entertainment, but as a tool for sustainable national
development, and I intend to be part of shaping that future responsibly.
References
AGBI, 2025. Savvy Games Group Overview. [online] Available at:
https://www.agbi.com/companies/savvy-games-group/
Esports World Cup, 2025. Club Partner Program Announcement. [online] Available at:
https://esportsworldcup.com/en/news/ewcf-club-partner-program-2025
Saudi Arabia Breaking News, 2025. Saudi Esports Federation Launches SEF Arena: The
World’s Largest Gaming and Esports Zone. [online] Available at: https://www.saudiarabia
breakingnews.com/post/saudi-esports-federation-launches-sef-arena-the-world-s-largest-
gaming-and-esports-zone
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)
**## CRKC5002Assessment__11.docx**
CRKC5002 Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainability in Practice
Interim Assignment and Final Assessment
University of Cumbria and Robert Kennedy College
**General Instructions – Please read carefully**
You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
In addition, by the end of Unit 3 you must upload a paper that will consolidate your learning from the first three units and prepare you for the final assessment (see
_Interim Assignment_, on the final page of this document). This paper will not be graded, but it is an important way of monitoring your progress and preparing you for the final assessment.
Your paper must have a clear structure and include:
· Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4)
· Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
· A declaration of authenticity – confirming that you are the sole author of the assessment and that you have acknowledged all of your sources
· List of References cited in the text – you must use in-text citations to support your information and arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. You are required to use the Harvard system for this.
You should read the criteria for assessment section below carefully to ensure that within your assessment you have addressed all of the issues for which marks are available.
Your word count, excluding cover page, abstract, table of contents and reference list
**no more than 3000 words in total.** UoC have strict regulations regarding word limits – the penalties for exceeding them are set out in section 3
[HERE](https://www.cumbria.ac.uk/media/university-of-cumbria-website/content-assets/public/aqs/documents/academicregulations/Appendix-3c.pdf)
You must submit your work by 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of the module. UoC have strict regulations for submission of work, and the penalties for late submission are set out in section 2 of the link above.
**Submissions for the final assessment should be machine readable and in MS-Word readable formats only please don’t use pdf or other formats. submit only one file, and include any Excel analysis as images, not embedded files**
Please ask any questions about the interim assignment and final assessment in the Forum.
**Final Assessment**
The assessment in the module is by a portfolio, in which you submit various elements of your work through the course of the module, to help you provide a complete picture of your development and achievement.
Your portfolio should include:
· An analysis of the nature of sustainability and its importance to global economy, social wellbeing, and the environment of the planet.
(about 750 words)
· A review and evaluation of the role of stakeholders who influence the actions of businesses – you may choose more than one context to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· A discussion and analysis of the role of ethics and morals in modern business practice – you may choose specific contexts to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· USING CASE STUDIES OF YOUR CHOICE, an analysis and comparison of the issues faced and the actions taken by AT LEAST TWO businesses or organisations
(about 1250 words)
Apply as many of the concepts covered in this module as you can.
The number of words suggested are for guidance only – the important issue is that you do not exceed the overall word limit – but you should bear in mind that you need to address ALL of the criteria listed below within this word limit, and that those criteria DO NOT perfectly match the tasks for your assignment. Failure to address criteria will mean no marks can be awarded for that element of the assessment.
**Criteria for assessment:**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **First >70%** | **2:i 60-69%** | **2:ii 50-59%** | **Pass 40- 49%** | **Fail < 40%** |
| Analyse key contemporary sustainability, responsibility, and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and critical assessment of a full range of relevant issues in clearly defined and appropriate contexts | Good critical assessment of a good range of relevant issues in appropriate contexts | Competent assessment of most important issues in appropriate context | Clear understanding, but limited assessment an of issues with limited application to appropriate context | Little or no understanding or assessment of issues and/or failure to apply to appropriate context |
| Investigate a range of sustainability and responsibility challenges and dilemmas experienced by business and other organisations<br>**20% of Marks** | Sophisticated reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Appropriate reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | An understanding of and some reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Limited reflection on and/or limited understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation. | Little or no reflection on and/or complete lack of understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation |
| Analyse ethical theories and practice (deontology, consequentialism, virtue etc.)<br>**20% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s0 | Sound and detailed evaluation of ethical theories and practice in = appropriate context(s) | Appropriate evaluation of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s) | Limited evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice in justifiable context(s) | Little or no evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice and/or application to inappropriate context(s) |
| Compare the complexities comprising organisational cases in the field of sustainability, responsibility and ethics<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Full analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Adequate analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Limited analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics that demonstrates understanding of the main issues | Little or no analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics and/or little understanding of the issues involved |
| Present a paper using language, referencing and presentation that maintains the confidence of the reader in your academic credibility<br>**10% of Marks** | Fully and appropriately referenced, well presented. Excellent use of language.<br>Meets all academic conventions.<br>Bibliography accurate. | Very good referencing, well presented and clear use of language and sound use of academic conventions.<br>Bibliography some minor errors | Generally well referenced, well presented and clear use of language but with some errors in academic conventions.<br>Bibliography<br>Some errors and omissions | Inadequately presented with inconsistent academic conventions. Poor use of language.<br>Bibliography major errors and omissions | Little referenced work, poorly presented and very unclear language with serious errors.<br>Does not meet academic conventions.<br>Bibliography very poor, inaccurate, incomplete or not |
| | | | | | |
**SCROLL TO NEXT PAGE FOR INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**
| |
| — |
| **INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**<br>The Interim, formative assignment will consist of an individual submission of about 500 words in the Class Forum (initially visible only to you and the tutor); this is not graded, and can be amended subsequently to form part of your final assessment. <br>After you have submitted your formative assignment you will be able to see other students’ submissions, and you are expected to make general critical comments (of both a positive and negative nature) throughout the forum discussions. The tutor will also give general feedback on these postings, and by participating in the asynchronous class forums you can gather continuous feedback that can be directly applied to your summative assessment.<br>For this formative assignment you are required to write about 500 words on YOUR understanding of the meaning of sustainable development in the context of your choice. This can be at any scale – from the global to the individual – and in any context. <br>The assignment must be submitted no later than 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of module 3<br>In these 500 words you should<br>· Provide YOUR working definition of sustainability – with an explanation of how you have reached this view<br>· Support the information you give and the ideas you use by references to appropriate sources<br>· Make clear the context of your discussion (in terms of country, culture, economic development, scale – as appropriate)<br>· Conclude with how YOU, in the light of your discussion, intent behaving in future.<br>It goes without saying that this must be your own work, due attention must be given to referencing the sources of your ideas and information – and remember that copying large sections of a source is NOT acceptable, even if you acknowledge its source. Refer to the University resource <br>[HERE](https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/Student-Life/Learning/Skills-Cumbria/Referencing-and-Avoiding-Plagiarism/) if you are in any doubt. <br> <br>NOT |
## image1.png
## image2.png
**CSR.pptx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/csr-pptx-10360655)
**Appendix-3c.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendix-3c-pdf)
**## RKC_Grade_Report_-_RKC-5004_-_Interim_Assignment_P1055195.pdf**
ABDULAZIZ ALRASHIDI GRADE REPORT (#479810)
Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice – Interim
Assignment
Your Assignment
CRKC5004 – Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice
Your Interim Assignment – Note this is only feedback: this assignment DOES NOT carry a
mark
What you have done well:
• The paper was presented appropriately
• You covered most of the questions
• You have given definitions of sustainability
• You have provided a context for your discussion
• You have supported arguments with reference to theory
• There is a list of references that have been cited in the text
What you could improve: –
• This is a thoughtful and well presented response, and I don't see a lot more that
you could do within the word limit, but do watch the spelling and the English in order to
maintain the confidence of the reader
Don’t forget that to complete the assignment you need to comment on other submissions.
Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia’s Esports and Gaming Industry
Working Definition of Sustainability
To me, sustainability in the context of esports and gaming means creating a digital
entertainment ecosystem that can thrive long-term by balancing economic growth,
cultural relevance, and community well-being. I arrived at this view by examining how
global sustainability principles — such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) —
can be adapted to a rapidly growing digital sector, especially in a country like Saudi
Arabia, where national strategies (like Vision 2030) aim to diversify the economy and
empower youth.
In esports, sustainability goes beyond environmental considerations. It includes equitable
access to technology and opportunities, long-term talent development, gender inclusion,
infrastructure investment, and ethical digital engagement. These elements form the
foundation for a vibrant, future-proof industry.
Supporting Ideas with References
Saudi Arabia’s efforts in the esports and gaming space reflect a deep commitment to
sustainable development. The Saudi Esports Federation (SEF), launched in 2017, has been
central in fostering an ecosystem that promotes professional growth, international
collaboration, and youth engagement. One example is the SEF Arena, opened in Riyadh,
the largest gaming venue of its kind globally, providing not only infrastructure but also
community-driven, long-term platforms for talent and innovation (Saudi Arabia Breaking
News, 2025).
Similarly, the Esports World Cup Foundation (EWCF)’s Club Support Program shows a
model of financial and competitive sustainability. It offers up to $1 million in funding to
top-tier esports clubs to help them expand, compete globally, and engage fans in more
meaningful ways. This initiative reflects how institutional support can ensure industry
resilience and global positioning (Esports World Cup, 2025).
From an economic sustainability standpoint, Savvy Games Group, a Public Investment
Fund subsidiary, has committed over $38 billion in global gaming investments. These
include studio acquisitions, partnerships, and local development, with a strong focus on
creating jobs, intellectual property, and economic diversification (AGBI, 2025). This
approach blends national development goals with global gaming growth, ensuring long-
term return and industry vitality.
Contextual Understanding
This discussion is set within the socio-economic and cultural transformation of Saudi
Arabia, where over 60% of the population is under 30. The government’s Vision 2030 is
actively reshaping the economy away from oil dependency and toward tech, tourism, and
entertainment. Esports is a strategic pillar of this change. It aligns with local culture —
where digital gaming is immensely popular — while also introducing global
competitiveness and professionalism.
Personal Reflection and Future Actions
Understanding how Saudi Arabia is embedding sustainability in its gaming and esports
development motivates me to be more conscious of my own role. As a student and
potential future professional in this sector, I aim to:
– Promote digital inclusion by supporting grassroots gaming communities.
– Advocate for ethical and inclusive content creation.
– Engage in research or volunteer opportunities within SEF or Savvy to contribute to their
mission.
Ultimately, I see esports not just as entertainment, but as a tool for sustainable national
development, and I intend to be part of shaping that future responsibly.
References
AGBI, 2025. Savvy Games Group Overview. [online] Available at:
https://www.agbi.com/companies/savvy-games-group/
Esports World Cup, 2025. Club Partner Program Announcement. [online] Available at:
https://esportsworldcup.com/en/news/ewcf-club-partner-program-2025
Saudi Arabia Breaking News, 2025. Saudi Esports Federation Launches SEF Arena: The
World’s Largest Gaming and Esports Zone. [online] Available at: https://www.saudiarabia
breakingnews.com/post/saudi-esports-federation-launches-sef-arena-the-world-s-largest-
gaming-and-esports-zone
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)
**## CRKC5002Assessment__11.docx**
CRKC5002 Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainability in Practice
Interim Assignment and Final Assessment
University of Cumbria and Robert Kennedy College
**General Instructions – Please read carefully**
You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
In addition, by the end of Unit 3 you must upload a paper that will consolidate your learning from the first three units and prepare you for the final assessment (see
_Interim Assignment_, on the final page of this document). This paper will not be graded, but it is an important way of monitoring your progress and preparing you for the final assessment.
Your paper must have a clear structure and include:
· Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4)
· Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
· A declaration of authenticity – confirming that you are the sole author of the assessment and that you have acknowledged all of your sources
· List of References cited in the text – you must use in-text citations to support your information and arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. You are required to use the Harvard system for this.
You should read the criteria for assessment section below carefully to ensure that within your assessment you have addressed all of the issues for which marks are available.
Your word count, excluding cover page, abstract, table of contents and reference list
**no more than 3000 words in total.** UoC have strict regulations regarding word limits – the penalties for exceeding them are set out in section 3
[HERE](https://www.cumbria.ac.uk/media/university-of-cumbria-website/content-assets/public/aqs/documents/academicregulations/Appendix-3c.pdf)
You must submit your work by 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of the module. UoC have strict regulations for submission of work, and the penalties for late submission are set out in section 2 of the link above.
**Submissions for the final assessment should be machine readable and in MS-Word readable formats only please don’t use pdf or other formats. submit only one file, and include any Excel analysis as images, not embedded files**
Please ask any questions about the interim assignment and final assessment in the Forum.
**Final Assessment**
The assessment in the module is by a portfolio, in which you submit various elements of your work through the course of the module, to help you provide a complete picture of your development and achievement.
Your portfolio should include:
· An analysis of the nature of sustainability and its importance to global economy, social wellbeing, and the environment of the planet.
(about 750 words)
· A review and evaluation of the role of stakeholders who influence the actions of businesses – you may choose more than one context to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· A discussion and analysis of the role of ethics and morals in modern business practice – you may choose specific contexts to illustrate particular points
(about 500 words)
· USING CASE STUDIES OF YOUR CHOICE, an analysis and comparison of the issues faced and the actions taken by AT LEAST TWO businesses or organisations
(about 1250 words)
Apply as many of the concepts covered in this module as you can.
The number of words suggested are for guidance only – the important issue is that you do not exceed the overall word limit – but you should bear in mind that you need to address ALL of the criteria listed below within this word limit, and that those criteria DO NOT perfectly match the tasks for your assignment. Failure to address criteria will mean no marks can be awarded for that element of the assessment.
**Criteria for assessment:**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **First >70%** | **2:i 60-69%** | **2:ii 50-59%** | **Pass 40- 49%** | **Fail < 40%** |
| Analyse key contemporary sustainability, responsibility, and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and critical assessment of a full range of relevant issues in clearly defined and appropriate contexts | Good critical assessment of a good range of relevant issues in appropriate contexts | Competent assessment of most important issues in appropriate context | Clear understanding, but limited assessment an of issues with limited application to appropriate context | Little or no understanding or assessment of issues and/or failure to apply to appropriate context |
| Investigate a range of sustainability and responsibility challenges and dilemmas experienced by business and other organisations<br>**20% of Marks** | Sophisticated reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Appropriate reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | An understanding of and some reflection on the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisations | Limited reflection on and/or limited understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation. | Little or no reflection on and/or complete lack of understanding of the impact of the demands of CSR and ethical issues faced by businesses and other organisation |
| Analyse ethical theories and practice (deontology, consequentialism, virtue etc.)<br>**20% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s0 | Sound and detailed evaluation of ethical theories and practice in = appropriate context(s) | Appropriate evaluation of ethical theories and practice in appropriate context(s) | Limited evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice in justifiable context(s) | Little or no evaluation of the use of ethical theories and practice and/or application to inappropriate context(s) |
| Compare the complexities comprising organisational cases in the field of sustainability, responsibility and ethics<br>**25% of Marks** | Full and sophisticated analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Full analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Adequate analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics | Limited analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics that demonstrates understanding of the main issues | Little or no analysis of the ways <br>in which the chosen organizations are addressing issues of sustainability, responsibility and ethics and/or little understanding of the issues involved |
| Present a paper using language, referencing and presentation that maintains the confidence of the reader in your academic credibility<br>**10% of Marks** | Fully and appropriately referenced, well presented. Excellent use of language.<br>Meets all academic conventions.<br>Bibliography accurate. | Very good referencing, well presented and clear use of language and sound use of academic conventions.<br>Bibliography some minor errors | Generally well referenced, well presented and clear use of language but with some errors in academic conventions.<br>Bibliography<br>Some errors and omissions | Inadequately presented with inconsistent academic conventions. Poor use of language.<br>Bibliography major errors and omissions | Little referenced work, poorly presented and very unclear language with serious errors.<br>Does not meet academic conventions.<br>Bibliography very poor, inaccurate, incomplete or not |
| | | | | | |
**SCROLL TO NEXT PAGE FOR INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**
| |
| — |
| **INTERIM ASSIGNMENT**<br>The Interim, formative assignment will consist of an individual submission of about 500 words in the Class Forum (initially visible only to you and the tutor); this is not graded, and can be amended subsequently to form part of your final assessment. <br>After you have submitted your formative assignment you will be able to see other students’ submissions, and you are expected to make general critical comments (of both a positive and negative nature) throughout the forum discussions. The tutor will also give general feedback on these postings, and by participating in the asynchronous class forums you can gather continuous feedback that can be directly applied to your summative assessment.<br>For this formative assignment you are required to write about 500 words on YOUR understanding of the meaning of sustainable development in the context of your choice. This can be at any scale – from the global to the individual – and in any context. <br>The assignment must be submitted no later than 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of module 3<br>In these 500 words you should<br>· Provide YOUR working definition of sustainability – with an explanation of how you have reached this view<br>· Support the information you give and the ideas you use by references to appropriate sources<br>· Make clear the context of your discussion (in terms of country, culture, economic development, scale – as appropriate)<br>· Conclude with how YOU, in the light of your discussion, intent behaving in future.<br>It goes without saying that this must be your own work, due attention must be given to referencing the sources of your ideas and information – and remember that copying large sections of a source is NOT acceptable, even if you acknowledge its source. Refer to the University resource <br>[HERE](https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/Student-Life/Learning/Skills-Cumbria/Referencing-and-Avoiding-Plagiarism/) if you are in any doubt. <br> <br>NOT |
## image1.png
## image2.png
**CSR.pptx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/csr-pptx-10360655)
**Appendix-3c.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendix-3c-pdf)
– 1
– 2
– 3
– 4