Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Week 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please look at the attached document for directions, and please no plagiarism. – ## week4.docx **## week4.docx** Discussion 4: Methods Need Back by July 23 My Topic **: Implementing Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) to Enhance Classroom Management in K–12 Schools** Synthesize infor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please look at the attached document for directions, and please no plagiarism.

    – ## week4.docx

    **## week4.docx**

    Discussion 4: Methods Need Back by July 23

    My Topic
    **: Implementing Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) to Enhance Classroom Management in K–12 Schools**

    Synthesize information from various sources into a coherent and well-structured document.

    Tasks

    1. Read the
    [Module 4 Preparation Overview](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/21610/pages/module-4-preparation)

    2. By the due date indicated, complete your initial response:

    · Share your approved topic and your SMART goal(s) and add one page summary of documents/reports you plan to obtain, provide rationale for using them, explain what data you want to use from each of the sources listed by you. The full document explaining your methods will be submitted in the
    [Module 4: Methods- Documents, Reports, Validity, Reliability](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/21610/assignments/552642) assignment.

    Assignment 2 Module 4: Methods-Documents, Reports, Validity, Reliability 3-4 pages Need back By Sunday.

    Purpose

    To provide the rationale that the school improvement project is worth undertaking.

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will analyze the methods to be used in your school improvement plan. A school improvement plan aims to enhance the overall educational experience and outcomes for students by identifying areas of improvement and implementing targeted strategies. By utilizing appropriate methods and analyzing relevant secondary data, schools can make informed decisions and create effective improvement plans.

    Criteria for evaluating secondary data sources:

    **Who collected the data?**

    · Data from professional organizations, known brands, or government agencies will always have a trustworthiness not commonly associated with information gathered from less credible resources such as personal blogs or websites.

    **When was the data collected?**

    · For rapidly evolving fields, such as education, more recent sources are preferred as they are more likely to reflect current practices and research.

    **Is the data consistent with the data from other sources?**

    · External data is useless to your organization if it isn’t correct. Take the time to check that your source is reliable so you can trust the data they are providing.

    Tasks

    1. Read the Overview.

    2. Analyze the methods in which you obtain the school improvement data.

    · When using secondary data, it's important to consider potential limitations, such as data quality, relevance, and reliability. Additionally, obtaining necessary permissions and ensuring compliance with data protection and privacy regulations is crucial. Careful analysis and triangulation of multiple data sources can help paint a comprehensive picture and guide effective school improvement efforts.

    3. Ensure that the data source aligns with your SMART goal(s) and provides relevant information on learning outcomes.

    4. Make sure that the target population and specific needs of the school community are considered.

    5. Use the Guiding Questions for writing your assignment:

    · What documents/reports have you used for data analysis?

    · Why do these documents contain the most accurate up-to-date data? How do you know?

    · What data can be used from a specific report?

    · How will the data be used to construct the improvement plan?

    · Other considerations and/or roadblocks to data retrieval?

    6. Compose a paper responding to the above questions.

    7. Be as specific as possible in describing and explaining each point. This should demonstrate the reliability and validity of your data resources.

    8. Paper formatting requirements: Double-spaced, size 12 font, Times New Roman, APA formatting.

    9. Proofread your paper before submission. Ensure that your assignment is well-organized, coherent, and free from grammatical errors.

    **## week4.docx**

    Discussion 4: Methods Need Back by July 23

    My Topic
    **: Implementing Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) to Enhance Classroom Management in K–12 Schools**

    Synthesize information from various sources into a coherent and well-structured document.

    Tasks

    1. Read the
    [Module 4 Preparation Overview](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/21610/pages/module-4-preparation)

    2. By the due date indicated, complete your initial response:

    · Share your approved topic and your SMART goal(s) and add one page summary of documents/reports you plan to obtain, provide rationale for using them, explain what data you want to use from each of the sources listed by you. The full document explaining your methods will be submitted in the
    [Module 4: Methods- Documents, Reports, Validity, Reliability](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/21610/assignments/552642) assignment.

    Assignment 2 Module 4: Methods-Documents, Reports, Validity, Reliability 3-4 pages Need back By Sunday.

    Purpose

    To provide the rationale that the school improvement project is worth undertaking.

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will analyze the methods to be used in your school improvement plan. A school improvement plan aims to enhance the overall educational experience and outcomes for students by identifying areas of improvement and implementing targeted strategies. By utilizing appropriate methods and analyzing relevant secondary data, schools can make informed decisions and create effective improvement plans.

    Criteria for evaluating secondary data sources:

    **Who collected the data?**

    · Data from professional organizations, known brands, or government agencies will always have a trustworthiness not commonly associated with information gathered from less credible resources such as personal blogs or websites.

    **When was the data collected?**

    · For rapidly evolving fields, such as education, more recent sources are preferred as they are more likely to reflect current practices and research.

    **Is the data consistent with the data from other sources?**

    · External data is useless to your organization if it isn’t correct. Take the time to check that your source is reliable so you can trust the data they are providing.

    Tasks

    1. Read the Overview.

    2. Analyze the methods in which you obtain the school improvement data.

    · When using secondary data, it's important to consider potential limitations, such as data quality, relevance, and reliability. Additionally, obtaining necessary permissions and ensuring compliance with data protection and privacy regulations is crucial. Careful analysis and triangulation of multiple data sources can help paint a comprehensive picture and guide effective school improvement efforts.

    3. Ensure that the data source aligns with your SMART goal(s) and provides relevant information on learning outcomes.

    4. Make sure that the target population and specific needs of the school community are considered.

    5. Use the Guiding Questions for writing your assignment:

    · What documents/reports have you used for data analysis?

    · Why do these documents contain the most accurate up-to-date data? How do you know?

    · What data can be used from a specific report?

    · How will the data be used to construct the improvement plan?

    · Other considerations and/or roadblocks to data retrieval?

    6. Compose a paper responding to the above questions.

    7. Be as specific as possible in describing and explaining each point. This should demonstrate the reliability and validity of your data resources.

    8. Paper formatting requirements: Double-spaced, size 12 font, Times New Roman, APA formatting.

    9. Proofread your paper before submission. Ensure that your assignment is well-organized, coherent, and free from grammatical errors.

  • [Solved] English Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering English Assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Summative Assessment: Epidemiological Measure in Immigrant Health Presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need someone to help me with a slide presentation \ IMG_3078.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3078-jpeg-10356733 "IMG_3078.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need someone to help me with a slide presentation
    \
    IMG_3078.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3078-jpeg-10356733 "IMG_3078.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Discussion Thread: Camps and Campus Ministries

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Share an example of effective Christian sport outreach through either a coach or coaches, campus ministry, sport camps, or in a local community. The example can be, but doesn’t have to be, a Fellowship of Christian Athletes example. Explain why you think the example was effective. least 400 words st…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Share an example of effective Christian sport outreach through either a coach or coaches, campus ministry, sport camps, or in a local community. The example can be, but doesn’t have to be, a Fellowship of Christian Athletes example. Explain why you think the example was effective.
    least 400 words
    students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly
    citation and 1 Scripture reference in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1
    scholarly citation and 1 Scripture reference in APA format. Any sources cited must have been
    published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include academic scholarly journal
    articles or of course the textbook, the Bible, etc.

  • [Solved] Course Capstone Project: Proposal and Pitch

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need someone to help me do a proposal and pitch. \ IMG_3079.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3079-jpeg-10356735 "IMG_3079.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need someone to help me do a proposal and pitch.
    \
    IMG_3079.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3079-jpeg-10356735 "IMG_3079.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Scholarly Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Scholarly Article Review article included – ## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf – EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf **## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf** NR326 Mental Health Nursing RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines Purpose The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article rel…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Scholarly Article Review article included

    – ## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf

    – EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf

    **## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf**

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines
    Purpose
    The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

    Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

    (CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for
    psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

    (CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational
    development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

    (CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making.
    (PO 6)

    (CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

    Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
    this assignment.

    Total points possible: 100 points

    Preparing the assignment
    1) Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

    a. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health
    nursing. The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
    • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is appropriate.

    b. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for
    faculty approval.

    c. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages.
    2) Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).

    a. Introduction (10 points/10%)
    • Establishes purpose of the paper
    • Captures attention of the reader

    b. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
    • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
    • Key points of the article
    • Key evidence presented
    • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

    c. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
    • Present strengths of the article
    • Present weaknesses of the article
    • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

    d. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
    • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
    • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    • Is clearly written

    e. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
    • Current (published in last 5 years)
    • Relevant to mental health care
    • Not used by another student within the clinical group
    • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    f. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_MAY21 2

    • Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
    • No spelling or typographical errors
    • Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages.
    • Citations in the text and reference page

    For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

    Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully
    understand the concepts learned in the review module.

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 3

    Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

    Assignment Section and
    Required Criteria

    (Points possible/% of total points available)

    Highest Level of
    Performance

    High Level of
    Performance

    Satisfactory Level
    of Performance

    Unsatisfactory
    Level of

    Performance

    Section not
    present in paper

    Introduction
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Establishes purpose of the paper
    2. Captures attention of the reader

    Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for this section presented.

    Article Summary
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 24 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Statistics to support significance of the topic to

    mental health care
    2. Key points of the article
    3. Key evidence presented
    4. Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated

    into your nursing practice

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Critique
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Present strengths of the article
    2. Present weaknesses of the article

    3. Discuss if you would/would not recommend this
    article to a colleague

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2
    requirements for

    section.

    Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for
    this section

    presented.

    Conclusion
    (15 points/15%)

    15 points 11 points 6 points 0 points

    1. Provides analysis or synthesis of information within

    the body of the text
    2. Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    3. Is clearly written

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Selection and Approval
    (5 points/5%)

    5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points

    1. Current (published in last 5 years)

    2. Relevant to mental health care
    Includes 4 Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 No requirements for

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 4

    3. Not used by another student within the clinical group
    4. Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirement for
    section.

    this section
    presented.

    APA Format and Writing Mechanics
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 7 points 4 points 0 points

    1. Correct use of standard English grammar and

    sentence structure
    2. No spelling or typographical errors
    3. Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference

    pages.

    4. Citations in the text and reference page

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Total Points Possible = 100 points

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-13-2025-pdf)

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-13-2025-pdf)

    **## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf**

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines
    Purpose
    The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

    Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

    (CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for
    psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

    (CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational
    development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

    (CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making.
    (PO 6)

    (CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

    Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
    this assignment.

    Total points possible: 100 points

    Preparing the assignment
    1) Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

    a. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health
    nursing. The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
    • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is appropriate.

    b. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for
    faculty approval.

    c. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages.
    2) Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).

    a. Introduction (10 points/10%)
    • Establishes purpose of the paper
    • Captures attention of the reader

    b. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
    • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
    • Key points of the article
    • Key evidence presented
    • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

    c. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
    • Present strengths of the article
    • Present weaknesses of the article
    • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

    d. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
    • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
    • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    • Is clearly written

    e. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
    • Current (published in last 5 years)
    • Relevant to mental health care
    • Not used by another student within the clinical group
    • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    f. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_MAY21 2

    • Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
    • No spelling or typographical errors
    • Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages.
    • Citations in the text and reference page

    For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

    Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully
    understand the concepts learned in the review module.

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 3

    Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

    Assignment Section and
    Required Criteria

    (Points possible/% of total points available)

    Highest Level of
    Performance

    High Level of
    Performance

    Satisfactory Level
    of Performance

    Unsatisfactory
    Level of

    Performance

    Section not
    present in paper

    Introduction
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Establishes purpose of the paper
    2. Captures attention of the reader

    Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for this section presented.

    Article Summary
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 24 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Statistics to support significance of the topic to

    mental health care
    2. Key points of the article
    3. Key evidence presented
    4. Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated

    into your nursing practice

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Critique
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Present strengths of the article
    2. Present weaknesses of the article

    3. Discuss if you would/would not recommend this
    article to a colleague

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2
    requirements for

    section.

    Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for
    this section

    presented.

    Conclusion
    (15 points/15%)

    15 points 11 points 6 points 0 points

    1. Provides analysis or synthesis of information within

    the body of the text
    2. Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    3. Is clearly written

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Selection and Approval
    (5 points/5%)

    5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points

    1. Current (published in last 5 years)

    2. Relevant to mental health care
    Includes 4 Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 No requirements for

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 4

    3. Not used by another student within the clinical group
    4. Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirement for
    section.

    this section
    presented.

    APA Format and Writing Mechanics
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 7 points 4 points 0 points

    1. Correct use of standard English grammar and

    sentence structure
    2. No spelling or typographical errors
    3. Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference

    pages.

    4. Citations in the text and reference page

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Total Points Possible = 100 points

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-13-2025-pdf)

    **## GuidelinesandRubricmental.pdf**

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines
    Purpose
    The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

    Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

    (CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for
    psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

    (CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational
    development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

    (CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making.
    (PO 6)

    (CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

    Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
    this assignment.

    Total points possible: 100 points

    Preparing the assignment
    1) Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

    a. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health
    nursing. The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
    • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is appropriate.

    b. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for
    faculty approval.

    c. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages.
    2) Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).

    a. Introduction (10 points/10%)
    • Establishes purpose of the paper
    • Captures attention of the reader

    b. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
    • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
    • Key points of the article
    • Key evidence presented
    • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

    c. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
    • Present strengths of the article
    • Present weaknesses of the article
    • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

    d. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
    • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
    • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    • Is clearly written

    e. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
    • Current (published in last 5 years)
    • Relevant to mental health care
    • Not used by another student within the clinical group
    • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    f. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_MAY21 2

    • Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
    • No spelling or typographical errors
    • Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages.
    • Citations in the text and reference page

    For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

    Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully
    understand the concepts learned in the review module.

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 3

    Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

    Assignment Section and
    Required Criteria

    (Points possible/% of total points available)

    Highest Level of
    Performance

    High Level of
    Performance

    Satisfactory Level
    of Performance

    Unsatisfactory
    Level of

    Performance

    Section not
    present in paper

    Introduction
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Establishes purpose of the paper
    2. Captures attention of the reader

    Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for this section presented.

    Article Summary
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 24 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Statistics to support significance of the topic to

    mental health care
    2. Key points of the article
    3. Key evidence presented
    4. Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated

    into your nursing practice

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Critique
    (30 points/30%)

    30 points 25 points 11 points 0 points

    Required criteria
    1. Present strengths of the article
    2. Present weaknesses of the article

    3. Discuss if you would/would not recommend this
    article to a colleague

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2
    requirements for

    section.

    Includes 1
    requirement for

    section.

    No requirements for
    this section

    presented.

    Conclusion
    (15 points/15%)

    15 points 11 points 6 points 0 points

    1. Provides analysis or synthesis of information within

    the body of the text
    2. Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
    3. Is clearly written

    Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Article Selection and Approval
    (5 points/5%)

    5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points

    1. Current (published in last 5 years)

    2. Relevant to mental health care
    Includes 4 Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 No requirements for

    NR326 Mental Health Nursing

    RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

    NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_JULY24 4

    3. Not used by another student within the clinical group
    4. Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirements for
    section.

    requirement for
    section.

    this section
    presented.

    APA Format and Writing Mechanics
    (10 points/10%)

    10 points 8 points 7 points 4 points 0 points

    1. Correct use of standard English grammar and

    sentence structure
    2. No spelling or typographical errors
    3. Paper is 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference

    pages.

    4. Citations in the text and reference page

    Includes 4

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 3

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 2

    requirements for
    section.

    Includes 1

    requirement for
    section.

    No requirements for

    this section
    presented.

    Total Points Possible = 100 points

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_13_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-13-2025-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Discussion question: Enviornmental Exposure

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need some help \ IMG_3077.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3077-jpeg-10356739 "IMG_3077.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need some help
    \
    IMG_3077.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3077-jpeg-10356739 "IMG_3077.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Business & Finance – Marketing assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Business & Finance – Marketing assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NEED HELP WITH SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    MENTALLY I WAS NOT READY I HAD BEEN GOING THROUGH ALOT OF FAMILY ISSUE. BUT LATELY I HAVE DONE SHOPIA CLASS THAT ARE RELATE TO MY COURSE AND THESE ARE MY ELECTIVE CLASSES. I AHBVE DONE 2 CLASSES AN ALMOST DONE WITH 2 MORE THESE CREDIT TRANSFERS ARE ALREADY ADD IT TO MY SCHOOL. \ Screenshot2025-06-1…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    MENTALLY I WAS NOT READY I HAD BEEN GOING THROUGH ALOT OF FAMILY ISSUE.
    BUT LATELY I HAVE DONE SHOPIA  CLASS THAT ARE RELATE TO MY COURSE AND THESE ARE MY ELECTIVE CLASSES. I AHBVE DONE 2 CLASSES AN ALMOST DONE WITH 2 MORE THESE CREDIT TRANSFERS ARE ALREADY ADD IT TO MY SCHOOL.
    \
    Screenshot2025-06-10112315.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-10112315-png-10356737 "Screenshot2025-06-10112315.png")

  • [Solved] case study 3.2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy2_Template.docx **## PSY1010_CaseStudy2_Template.docx** Page 2 **PSY1010**– Touchstone 3.2 Type Your Name Here ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology SCENARIO: Monica and Jennifer are coworkers that have been assigned to work on a project together. Jennifer is very organiz…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy2_Template.docx

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy2_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**– Touchstone 3.2

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica and Jennifer are coworkers that have been assigned to work on a project together. Jennifer is very organized and wants her and Monica to do really well on this project. To get started, Jennifer took some initiative and prepared a list of to-do items along with the due dates. She even color-coded the list to indicate who will do which item. Shortly after, Jennifer sends an email to Monica with the to-do list attached. Jennifer wants her partner to know that she is serious about their success.

    Monica is happy her teammate has shown initiative but is surprised by Jennifer's to-do list and feels a bit uncomfortable as she is feeling like Jennifer is micromanaging her. Monica wants to do her part on the project but is feeling anxious because she doesn’t know where she fits in. Monica is worried about working on the project. She wonders if she can succeed in this project since Jennifer is already the leader. Prior to this situation, Monica worked for a separate employer who asked her to work on a similar project. She felt anxious about her ability to successfully complete the project and attempted to communicate her feelings with a co-worker. However, her co-worker didn’t seem to understand Monica's concerns and said that she should just ignore her feelings and get the work done.

    As Monica ponders having a conversation with Jennifer, she starts to feel overwhelmed and thinks it might just be easier to be removed from the project.

    Date here

    Using your problem solving and self and social awareness skills and what you have learned about personality traits and emotions, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Remember, you are to help Monica calm her anxiety and find a solution to her problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What are the Big 5 personality traits? Name and describe each of them.

    **Question 2:** Consider the different approaches to the project taken by both Monica and Jennifer. On which of the Big 5 personality traits do they most differ? Discuss these differences in their personality traits.

    **Question 3:** Using what you learned about emotions, what advice would you give to Monica? Describe a specific strategy that Monica can use to manage her emotions and successfully complete the project.

    **Question 4:** If you were in this situation, how confident are you that you could successfully resolve a workplace conflict like the one that Monica faced? What past experiences or knowledge influence your answer? Explain how your experience or knowledge can resolve a similar workplace conflict.

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy2_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**– Touchstone 3.2

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica and Jennifer are coworkers that have been assigned to work on a project together. Jennifer is very organized and wants her and Monica to do really well on this project. To get started, Jennifer took some initiative and prepared a list of to-do items along with the due dates. She even color-coded the list to indicate who will do which item. Shortly after, Jennifer sends an email to Monica with the to-do list attached. Jennifer wants her partner to know that she is serious about their success.

    Monica is happy her teammate has shown initiative but is surprised by Jennifer's to-do list and feels a bit uncomfortable as she is feeling like Jennifer is micromanaging her. Monica wants to do her part on the project but is feeling anxious because she doesn’t know where she fits in. Monica is worried about working on the project. She wonders if she can succeed in this project since Jennifer is already the leader. Prior to this situation, Monica worked for a separate employer who asked her to work on a similar project. She felt anxious about her ability to successfully complete the project and attempted to communicate her feelings with a co-worker. However, her co-worker didn’t seem to understand Monica's concerns and said that she should just ignore her feelings and get the work done.

    As Monica ponders having a conversation with Jennifer, she starts to feel overwhelmed and thinks it might just be easier to be removed from the project.

    Date here

    Using your problem solving and self and social awareness skills and what you have learned about personality traits and emotions, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Remember, you are to help Monica calm her anxiety and find a solution to her problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What are the Big 5 personality traits? Name and describe each of them.

    **Question 2:** Consider the different approaches to the project taken by both Monica and Jennifer. On which of the Big 5 personality traits do they most differ? Discuss these differences in their personality traits.

    **Question 3:** Using what you learned about emotions, what advice would you give to Monica? Describe a specific strategy that Monica can use to manage her emotions and successfully complete the project.

    **Question 4:** If you were in this situation, how confident are you that you could successfully resolve a workplace conflict like the one that Monica faced? What past experiences or knowledge influence your answer? Explain how your experience or knowledge can resolve a similar workplace conflict.