Executive Solution Overview
I need help with my homework – ## MyReflectiontomyfieldexercies.docx **## MyReflectiontomyfieldexercies.docx** Requires Lopeswrite Assessment Description After completing your selected activities from the “Practicum/Field Experience document, meeting with the reading specialist to review students' D…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
I need help with my homework
– ## MyReflectiontomyfieldexercies.docx
**## MyReflectiontomyfieldexercies.docx**
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
After completing your selected activities from the “Practicum/Field Experience document, meeting with the reading specialist to review students' Data, and teaching a small group lesson using the State ELA Standards. Write a reflection about your teaching experiences that includes a connection to the teaching preparation standards. In 250-500 words, discuss how you or your mentor teacher supports the holistic development of students. Provide an example of an experience you participated in and discuss how it increased your professional knowledge and ethical practices related to student development.
APA Style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Lopes Write. A link to the Lopes Write technical support articles is in Class Resources if you need assistance.
**Rubric Criteria**
Expand All Rubric Criteria
**Supporting Holistic Development**
36 points
**Criteria Description**
Supporting Holistic Development
**5. Target**
36 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is insightful.
**4. Acceptable**
31.32 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is logical.
**3. Approaching**
26.64 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is underdeveloped.
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Professional Knowledge and Ethical Practices**
36 points
**Criteria Description**
Professional Knowledge and Ethical Practices
**5. Target**
36 points
A description of an experience that increased professional knowledge and ethical practices is meaningful and skillfully discusses how the experience will influence future professional practices.
**4. Acceptable**
31.32 points
A description of an experience that enhances professional knowledge and ethical practices is noteworthy, as it discusses how the experience will influence future professional practices.
v
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Organization**
9 points
**Criteria Description**
Organization
**5. Target**
9 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit, providing the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
**4. Acceptable**
7.83 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented are related to one another. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
**3. Approaching**
6.66 points
The content is not well organized, even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Mechanics of Writing**
9 points
**Criteria Description**
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
**5. Target**
9 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure is used throughout.
**4. Acceptable**
7.83 points
A few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
**3. Approaching**
6.66 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Required References:
Model Code of Ethics for Educators (MCEE)
**Required**
Download and review the MCEE.
https://www.nasdtec.ne
Get Serious About Summer Reading
**Required**
Explore “Get Serious About Summer Reading,” located on the National Education Association website (2024).
https://www.nea.org/r
School–Family Partnerships for Culturally Sustaining Texts
**Required**
Read “School–Family Partnerships for Culturally Sustaining Texts,” by Jennerjohn, from
_Reading Teacher_ (2020).
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/
**## MyReflectiontomyfieldexercies.docx**
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
After completing your selected activities from the “Practicum/Field Experience document, meeting with the reading specialist to review students' Data, and teaching a small group lesson using the State ELA Standards. Write a reflection about your teaching experiences that includes a connection to the teaching preparation standards. In 250-500 words, discuss how you or your mentor teacher supports the holistic development of students. Provide an example of an experience you participated in and discuss how it increased your professional knowledge and ethical practices related to student development.
APA Style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Lopes Write. A link to the Lopes Write technical support articles is in Class Resources if you need assistance.
**Rubric Criteria**
Expand All Rubric Criteria
**Supporting Holistic Development**
36 points
**Criteria Description**
Supporting Holistic Development
**5. Target**
36 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is insightful.
**4. Acceptable**
31.32 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is logical.
**3. Approaching**
26.64 points
Discussion of how the holistic development of students was supported throughout the field experience is underdeveloped.
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Professional Knowledge and Ethical Practices**
36 points
**Criteria Description**
Professional Knowledge and Ethical Practices
**5. Target**
36 points
A description of an experience that increased professional knowledge and ethical practices is meaningful and skillfully discusses how the experience will influence future professional practices.
**4. Acceptable**
31.32 points
A description of an experience that enhances professional knowledge and ethical practices is noteworthy, as it discusses how the experience will influence future professional practices.
v
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Organization**
9 points
**Criteria Description**
Organization
**5. Target**
9 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit, providing the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
**4. Acceptable**
7.83 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented are related to one another. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
**3. Approaching**
6.66 points
The content is not well organized, even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.
**No Submission**
0 points
Not addressed.
**Mechanics of Writing**
9 points
**Criteria Description**
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
**5. Target**
9 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure is used throughout.
**4. Acceptable**
7.83 points
A few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
**3. Approaching**
6.66 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Required References:
Model Code of Ethics for Educators (MCEE)
**Required**
Download and review the MCEE.
https://www.nasdtec.ne
Get Serious About Summer Reading
**Required**
Explore “Get Serious About Summer Reading,” located on the National Education Association website (2024).
https://www.nea.org/r
School–Family Partnerships for Culturally Sustaining Texts
**Required**
Read “School–Family Partnerships for Culturally Sustaining Texts,” by Jennerjohn, from
_Reading Teacher_ (2020).
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/
Leave a Reply