My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] NNVVMM

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NNVVMM.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Residency week 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Two pages . APA format. Due in 24 hrs. Use the PDF provided and link to be able to complete assignment – ## residencyweek1assignment.docx – PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf **## residencyweek1assignment.docx** [**https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignmen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Two pages . APA format. Due in 24 hrs. Use the PDF provided and link to be able to complete assignment

    – ## residencyweek1assignment.docx

    – PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf

    **## residencyweek1assignment.docx**

    [**https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment**](https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment)

    This week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.

    Discuss at least
    **two** of the following in your paper:

    · Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.

    · Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?

    · The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.

    · Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.

    Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style. Refer to the rubric for more information.

    If you would like to review more information, you can go to the following link to view 12 recorded webinars related to Human Research Protection on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services YouTube channel:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914)![A screenshot of a white and black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)![A white paper with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phrp-archived-course-materials-pdf-10342311)

    **PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phrp-archived-course-materials-pdf-10342311)

    **## residencyweek1assignment.docx**

    [**https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment**](https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment)

    This week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.

    Discuss at least
    **two** of the following in your paper:

    · Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.

    · Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?

    · The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.

    · Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.

    Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style. Refer to the rubric for more information.

    If you would like to review more information, you can go to the following link to view 12 recorded webinars related to Human Research Protection on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services YouTube channel:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914)![A screenshot of a white and black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)![A white paper with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phrp-archived-course-materials-pdf-10342311)

    **## residencyweek1assignment.docx**

    [**https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment**](https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/human-subjectsAssignment)

    This week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.

    Discuss at least
    **two** of the following in your paper:

    · Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.

    · Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?

    · The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.

    · Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.

    Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style. Refer to the rubric for more information.

    If you would like to review more information, you can go to the following link to view 12 recorded webinars related to Human Research Protection on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services YouTube channel:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914)![A screenshot of a white and black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)![A white paper with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/residency-week-1)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phrp-archived-course-materials-pdf-10342311)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module6.docx **## Module6.docx** **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_ **Instructions:** Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying oth…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module6.docx

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your post should be at least four pages ( excluding title page and references page), formatted, and cited in the current APA style with support from non less than three academic sources.

    · Would you please post your assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday (week 6)

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your post should be at least four pages ( excluding title page and references page), formatted, and cited in the current APA style with support from non less than three academic sources.

    · Would you please post your assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday (week 6)

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

  • [Solved] discussion two HP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## DiscussiontwoHP.docx **## DiscussiontwoHP.docx** ![A screenshot of a phone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp) ![A screenshot of a text box AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## DiscussiontwoHP.docx

    **## DiscussiontwoHP.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a phone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![A screenshot of a text box AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![A screenshot of a text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    ## image4.png

    **## DiscussiontwoHP.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a phone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![A screenshot of a text box AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![A screenshot of a text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-two-hp)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    ## image4.png

  • [Solved] Week 1 (class 2)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 1 (class 2).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Legislature Advocacy on a Mental Health/Psychiatric Issue

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    my location: Miami Florida \ Screenshot2025-06-30at17.49.43.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-30at17-49-43-png "Screenshot2025-06-30at17.49.43.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    my location: Miami Florida
    \
    Screenshot2025-06-30at17.49.43.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-30at17-49-43-png "Screenshot2025-06-30at17.49.43.png")

  • [Solved] Week 1 reflect (class 2)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 1 reflect (class 2).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] unit 9 journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached – ## 673unit9journal.docx **## 673unit9journal.docx** 2 part assignment-the case study and questions should be written as a paper with references. Then the self reflection part can just be something for me to read in a video. The purpose of this video is self-reflection regarding the th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    – ## 673unit9journal.docx

    **## 673unit9journal.docx**

    2 part assignment-the case study and questions should be written as a paper with references.

    Then the self reflection part can just be something for me to read in a video.

    The purpose of this video is self-reflection regarding the therapeutic process and one’s own role in that process as a PMHNP provider. Through reflective practice, you will evaluate your own emotional intelligence as defined as the capacity to recognize one’s own feelings as well as others’ and one’s ability to monitor and manage those feelings. The point of the exercise is to learn about yourself, your triggers, the types of cases you end up getting overly involved with, and those you would rather refer to someone else. The idea is to be able to step back personally and analyze your behaviors/thoughts/decisions and how those impact both you and your clients.

    Your video should be 3–5 minutes in length.

    Case scenario:

    Nick is a 22-year-old man with a history of schizophrenia who is admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit for psychosis. He has been nonadherent with his outpatient medication regimen and has developed auditory hallucinations of voices talking about “demons stalking him” and delusions that helicopters are following him. He smashed all the televisions in the house because he believed that the local news anchorwoman was broadcasting his location to the authorities. His mother, with whom he lives, called the police.

    Nick has no past medical history other than schizophrenia. Basic metabolic panel, complete blood cell count, thyroid function tests, and urine analysis are normal. Urine toxicology is negative. When he arrives on the unit, he is started on risperidone 4 mg daily. Within the next 24 hours, nursing calls to request an urgent evaluation of the patient. He is circling the nursing station, appears anxious, and is having trouble speaking. Through clenched teeth he calls out, “My jaw is stuck!” His lower mandible is clenched, locked into position, and resists passive movement. His neck is slightly extended, and his eyes appear to be forcefully rolled in the direction of the upper right quadrant. He lacks rigidity in his upper or lower extremities.

    Vital signs are taken for this patient. Nick’s temperature is 98 °F, blood pressure is 125/82 mm Hg, pulse rate 88/min, respiratory rate is 18/min, and oxygen saturation is 98% on room air. Although it is difficult for him to speak, he is awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, time, and current situation. He is not diaphoretic. Diphenhydramine 50 mg is given intramuscularly. Within 20 minutes, Nick regains voluntary movement of his extraocular muscles and mandible. “Doctor, you are my hero!” he exclaims down the hallway.

    Two days later, Nick is seen pacing the hallways. When brought into the interview room, he sits down momentarily and then quickly stands back up. He marches in place for the duration of the interview. He comments, “I’m so uncomfortable. I can’t stay still.”

    · What is the primary diagnosis for Nick?

    · What are the different medication-induced movement disorders that occur in a client on antipsychotics?

    · What is acute dystonia? What is the treatment modality for acute dystonia?

    · What is akathisia? Explain the possible symptom presentation for a client exhibiting akathisia.

    · What is the treatment recommendation for akathisia?

    · What is tardive dyskinesia? How will you treat tardive dyskinesia?

    · What are the possible risks and benefits of long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications?

    · As a PMHNP, how will you promote the client’s medication compliance?

    **## 673unit9journal.docx**

    2 part assignment-the case study and questions should be written as a paper with references.

    Then the self reflection part can just be something for me to read in a video.

    The purpose of this video is self-reflection regarding the therapeutic process and one’s own role in that process as a PMHNP provider. Through reflective practice, you will evaluate your own emotional intelligence as defined as the capacity to recognize one’s own feelings as well as others’ and one’s ability to monitor and manage those feelings. The point of the exercise is to learn about yourself, your triggers, the types of cases you end up getting overly involved with, and those you would rather refer to someone else. The idea is to be able to step back personally and analyze your behaviors/thoughts/decisions and how those impact both you and your clients.

    Your video should be 3–5 minutes in length.

    Case scenario:

    Nick is a 22-year-old man with a history of schizophrenia who is admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit for psychosis. He has been nonadherent with his outpatient medication regimen and has developed auditory hallucinations of voices talking about “demons stalking him” and delusions that helicopters are following him. He smashed all the televisions in the house because he believed that the local news anchorwoman was broadcasting his location to the authorities. His mother, with whom he lives, called the police.

    Nick has no past medical history other than schizophrenia. Basic metabolic panel, complete blood cell count, thyroid function tests, and urine analysis are normal. Urine toxicology is negative. When he arrives on the unit, he is started on risperidone 4 mg daily. Within the next 24 hours, nursing calls to request an urgent evaluation of the patient. He is circling the nursing station, appears anxious, and is having trouble speaking. Through clenched teeth he calls out, “My jaw is stuck!” His lower mandible is clenched, locked into position, and resists passive movement. His neck is slightly extended, and his eyes appear to be forcefully rolled in the direction of the upper right quadrant. He lacks rigidity in his upper or lower extremities.

    Vital signs are taken for this patient. Nick’s temperature is 98 °F, blood pressure is 125/82 mm Hg, pulse rate 88/min, respiratory rate is 18/min, and oxygen saturation is 98% on room air. Although it is difficult for him to speak, he is awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, time, and current situation. He is not diaphoretic. Diphenhydramine 50 mg is given intramuscularly. Within 20 minutes, Nick regains voluntary movement of his extraocular muscles and mandible. “Doctor, you are my hero!” he exclaims down the hallway.

    Two days later, Nick is seen pacing the hallways. When brought into the interview room, he sits down momentarily and then quickly stands back up. He marches in place for the duration of the interview. He comments, “I’m so uncomfortable. I can’t stay still.”

    · What is the primary diagnosis for Nick?

    · What are the different medication-induced movement disorders that occur in a client on antipsychotics?

    · What is acute dystonia? What is the treatment modality for acute dystonia?

    · What is akathisia? Explain the possible symptom presentation for a client exhibiting akathisia.

    · What is the treatment recommendation for akathisia?

    · What is tardive dyskinesia? How will you treat tardive dyskinesia?

    · What are the possible risks and benefits of long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications?

    · As a PMHNP, how will you promote the client’s medication compliance?

  • [Solved] Week 2 (class 2)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 2 (class 2).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week 2 reflect (class 2)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 2 reflect (class 2).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.