Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Please refer to attachments
– ## CodingAssignment2.pdf
– ## CodingAssignment.docx
**## CodingAssignment2.pdf**
Coding Assignment
Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
Points 5
Submitting a file upload
Coding Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Code Book
Completed
1 pts
Analysis of
the Data
1 pts
Start Assignment
Coding Assignment: Instructions
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
analyzing qualitative data.
Instructions:
1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet
peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
paragraphs.
4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.
1 pts
Proficient
All relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Most relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No codes identified/
assignment not turned in.
1 pts
Proficient
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is relevant to the
codes identified.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is mostly relevant
to the codes identified.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Analysis does not consider
the codes and does not
provide any insight into the
data.
Description
of the Data 1 pts
Organization
1 pts
Mechanics
& Grammar
1 pts
Total Points: 5
1 pts
Proficient
Description of the data
provided in a minimum of
3-4 paragraphs.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Description of the data
provided in less than 3-4
paragraphs.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Description of the data is
weak or is not included.
1 pts
Proficient
Assignment is organized
using the Code Book
Template and has a logical
flow.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Assignment does not use
the template or is
unorganized.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Assignment was not
submitted or does not
include any information.
1 pts
Proficient
Presents information using
clear and concise
language in an organized
manner with no
grammatical errors.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Presents information in an
organized manner with few
grammatical errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presents information that
is not clear, logical,
professional, or organized
that the reader has
difficulty understanding
and contains numerous
grammatical errors.
**## CodingAssignment.docx**
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.
**To complete this assignment**, you need the
**three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.
**Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
**|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
**|** ).
**Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.
**Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.
## **Example**
Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:
186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
**|**
Lack of feedback.
**ID**
First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.
**Codes**
Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.
**Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**
The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).
In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.
Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
| 186 | 08 | 13 | |
You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**
001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
**|**
Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
**|**
Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.
002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
**|**
Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.
003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.
004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.
005 Students who use the classroom to show how
**smart** they are and to
**build** themselves up.
**|**
Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.
006 When required readings are not available.
**|**
When instructors put-down students.
**|**
When assignments are too difficult.
007 Professor who believe their view is the
**only** one acceptable.
**|** Disorganized classes.
**|** Dry readings.
008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
**|** Test questions that come out of the blue.
009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
**|** When people monopolize class.
010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
**|** When expectations for grades are unclear.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Course Requirements**
**01** = Can’t locate required readings
**02** =
_Unclear_ expectations of students
**03** =
_Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)
**04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)
**05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus
**Course Content**
**06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)
**07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content
**08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)
**09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics
**Teacher – Student Relationship**
**10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own
**11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)
**12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)
**Teaching Behavior**
**13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)
**14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)
**15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)
**16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions
**Student Behavior**
**17** = Students who monopolize class time
**18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)
**19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates
**20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students
**21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)
**98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme
**99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
| 001 | | | |
| 002 | | | |
| 003 | | | |
| 004 | | | |
| 005 | | | |
| 006 | | | |
| 007 | | | |
| 008 | | | |
| 009 | | | |
| 010 | | | |
After you complete the code sheet,
**summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:
**## CodingAssignment.docx**
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.
**To complete this assignment**, you need the
**three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.
**Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
**|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
**|** ).
**Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.
**Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.
## **Example**
Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:
186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
**|**
Lack of feedback.
**ID**
First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.
**Codes**
Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.
**Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**
The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).
In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.
Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
| 186 | 08 | 13 | |
You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**
001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
**|**
Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
**|**
Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.
002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
**|**
Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.
003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.
004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.
005 Students who use the classroom to show how
**smart** they are and to
**build** themselves up.
**|**
Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.
006 When required readings are not available.
**|**
When instructors put-down students.
**|**
When assignments are too difficult.
007 Professor who believe their view is the
**only** one acceptable.
**|** Disorganized classes.
**|** Dry readings.
008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
**|** Test questions that come out of the blue.
009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
**|** When people monopolize class.
010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
**|** When expectations for grades are unclear.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Course Requirements**
**01** = Can’t locate required readings
**02** =
_Unclear_ expectations of students
**03** =
_Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)
**04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)
**05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus
**Course Content**
**06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)
**07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content
**08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)
**09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics
**Teacher – Student Relationship**
**10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own
**11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)
**12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)
**Teaching Behavior**
**13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)
**14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)
**15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)
**16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions
**Student Behavior**
**17** = Students who monopolize class time
**18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)
**19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates
**20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students
**21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)
**98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme
**99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
| 001 | | | |
| 002 | | | |
| 003 | | | |
| 004 | | | |
| 005 | | | |
| 006 | | | |
| 007 | | | |
| 008 | | | |
| 009 | | | |
| 010 | | | |
After you complete the code sheet,
**summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:
**## CodingAssignment2.pdf**
Coding Assignment
Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
Points 5
Submitting a file upload
Coding Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Code Book
Completed
1 pts
Analysis of
the Data
1 pts
Start Assignment
Coding Assignment: Instructions
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
analyzing qualitative data.
Instructions:
1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet
peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
paragraphs.
4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.
1 pts
Proficient
All relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Most relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No codes identified/
assignment not turned in.
1 pts
Proficient
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is relevant to the
codes identified.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is mostly relevant
to the codes identified.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Analysis does not consider
the codes and does not
provide any insight into the
data.
Description
of the Data 1 pts
Organization
1 pts
Mechanics
& Grammar
1 pts
Total Points: 5
1 pts
Proficient
Description of the data
provided in a minimum of
3-4 paragraphs.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Description of the data
provided in less than 3-4
paragraphs.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Description of the data is
weak or is not included.
1 pts
Proficient
Assignment is organized
using the Code Book
Template and has a logical
flow.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Assignment does not use
the template or is
unorganized.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Assignment was not
submitted or does not
include any information.
1 pts
Proficient
Presents information using
clear and concise
language in an organized
manner with no
grammatical errors.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Presents information in an
organized manner with few
grammatical errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presents information that
is not clear, logical,
professional, or organized
that the reader has
difficulty understanding
and contains numerous
grammatical errors.
**## CodingAssignment.docx**
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.
**To complete this assignment**, you need the
**three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.
**Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
**|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
**|** ).
**Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.
**Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.
## **Example**
Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:
186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
**|**
Lack of feedback.
**ID**
First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.
**Codes**
Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.
**Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**
The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).
In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.
Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
| 186 | 08 | 13 | |
You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**
001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
**|**
Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
**|**
Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.
002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
**|**
Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.
003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.
004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.
005 Students who use the classroom to show how
**smart** they are and to
**build** themselves up.
**|**
Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.
006 When required readings are not available.
**|**
When instructors put-down students.
**|**
When assignments are too difficult.
007 Professor who believe their view is the
**only** one acceptable.
**|** Disorganized classes.
**|** Dry readings.
008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
**|** Test questions that come out of the blue.
009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
**|** When people monopolize class.
010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
**|** When expectations for grades are unclear.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Course Requirements**
**01** = Can’t locate required readings
**02** =
_Unclear_ expectations of students
**03** =
_Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)
**04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)
**05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus
**Course Content**
**06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)
**07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content
**08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)
**09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics
**Teacher – Student Relationship**
**10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own
**11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)
**12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)
**Teaching Behavior**
**13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)
**14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)
**15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)
**16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions
**Student Behavior**
**17** = Students who monopolize class time
**18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)
**19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates
**20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students
**21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)
**98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme
**99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
| 001 | | | |
| 002 | | | |
| 003 | | | |
| 004 | | | |
| 005 | | | |
| 006 | | | |
| 007 | | | |
| 008 | | | |
| 009 | | | |
| 010 | | | |
After you complete the code sheet,
**summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:
**## CodingAssignment2.pdf**
Coding Assignment
Due Jul 27 by 11:59pm
Points 5
Submitting a file upload
Coding Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Code Book
Completed
1 pts
Analysis of
the Data
1 pts
Start Assignment
Coding Assignment: Instructions
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the process of coding and
analyzing qualitative data.
Instructions:
1. Download the Qualitative Coding Assignment packet located in the Module 10 resources.
2. Read through the entire document and complete the code book using the instructions provided.
3. Submit the final code book along with a summary of the major themes or most common pet
peeves noted to the drop box. Your analysis of the data should be a minimum of 3-4 full
paragraphs.
4. You can submit the last page of the assignment with the code book and analysis. You do not need
a formal APA paper with a title page and references. No references are required for this
assignment. Simply provide your assessment based on the data that you coded.
1 pts
Proficient
All relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Most relevant codes were
identified for the code
book.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No codes identified/
assignment not turned in.
1 pts
Proficient
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is relevant to the
codes identified.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Analysis of the pertinent
findings is mostly relevant
to the codes identified.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Analysis does not consider
the codes and does not
provide any insight into the
data.
Description
of the Data 1 pts
Organization
1 pts
Mechanics
& Grammar
1 pts
Total Points: 5
1 pts
Proficient
Description of the data
provided in a minimum of
3-4 paragraphs.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Description of the data
provided in less than 3-4
paragraphs.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Description of the data is
weak or is not included.
1 pts
Proficient
Assignment is organized
using the Code Book
Template and has a logical
flow.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Assignment does not use
the template or is
unorganized.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Assignment was not
submitted or does not
include any information.
1 pts
Proficient
Presents information using
clear and concise
language in an organized
manner with no
grammatical errors.
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Presents information in an
organized manner with few
grammatical errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presents information that
is not clear, logical,
professional, or organized
that the reader has
difficulty understanding
and contains numerous
grammatical errors.
**## CodingAssignment.docx**
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
Content coding is one way to identify the themes or patterns found in the narrative text of qualitative research studies. The qualitative research assignment for Week 8 requires you to content code the narrative pet peeves of 10 nursing and social work students taking courses in a “brick and mortar” university. These students were asked to anonymously describe the problems (or “pet peeves”) they experienced in previous courses that detracted from their learning experience.
**To complete this assignment**, you need the
**three** documents: the student narrative text on pet peeves, the code scheme, and the code sheet. Below is a description of each of these documents. All of the needed resources can be found in this document.
**Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves (Page 3):** You will see the narrative text written by each of the 10 students in this document. Each student has a unique identification (ID) number. For example, 001 is the ID number of the first student and 010 is number for the last student. Some students only wrote about one pet peeve, whereas others listed up to two or more pet peeves. If a student listed two or more pet peeves, a “vertical bar”
**|** is used to separate each them. Take a look at the student whose ID number is 002. This student’s first pet peeve about course readings is separated from the second one by a vertical bar (
**|** ).
**Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 4):** A code scheme has unique numbers linked to different types of content or themes found in narrative text. For this assignment, you will see a unique number for each different type of pet peeve. For example, a pet peeve on not being able to locate required readings is assigned the number “01”. Sometimes the content of narrative text cannot be categorized, because it is unclear or doesn’t make sense. For this assignment, this type of narrative text is given the code number “99”. If narrative text is not a pet peeve, it is given the code number “97”.
**Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data (Page 5):** This is the form that you use to enter the code scheme number for each pet peeve in a student’s narrative text. The first column of the code sheet lists the student’s unique ID number. The next column (Code 1) is used to write the number from the code scheme that best describes the content of the first pet peeve listed by the student. The second column (Code 2) is for the second pet peeve, and the third column (Code 3) is for the last one.
## **Example**
Here is an example of how to code the narrative text on course pet peeves. In this example, the student described the following pet peeves in courses she had taken in the past:
186 Assignments that are just “busy work” with no perceived value.
**|**
Lack of feedback.
**ID**
First, the number “186” is the unique ID number for this student. When you code this student’s pet peeves, you need to write them on the line for this ID number.
**Codes**
Next you will see a vertical bar | in the narrative text on page 3 which means there are more than one pet peeve listed by the student.
**Code Sheet Example (Refer to Coding Scheme page 5)**
The first pet peeve is about assignments that are considered to be “busy work”. When you review the code scheme for student pet peeves, it looks like the number “08” (Assignments not geared to learning [e.g., busy work]) best describes this student’s pet peeve. You then enter the number “08” into the second column (Code 1) of the code sheet (see below).
In the next pet peeve, the student writes about “lack of feedback”. While her response is not very specific, it is most likely to related to code number “13” (Assignments returned without comments or feedback). You then enter “13” in the third column of the code sheet. Because this student did not list a third pet peeve, you then leave the fourth column (Code 3) blank.
Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **Code 1** | **Code 2** | **Code 3** |
| 186 | 08 | 13 | |
You are now ready to start content coding the narrative text of pet peeves for the 10 students in this assignment on page 3. When you are finished, you need to submit your completed code sheet on page 7 to the submission link in Week 5.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Student Narrative Text on Course Pet Peeves**
001 Professors who “don’t allow” students to disagree with their opinions.
**|**
Professors who grade based on the placement of commas and the number of spaces typed between words rather than on the ideas and thoughts developed.
**|**
Professors who give me reason to feel about 2 inches tall when I give an incorrect answer to a question.
002 Ridiculous amounts of reading to be done in a short period of time.
**|**
Not having an opportunity to discuss different viewpoints or different facets of a topic-issue.
003 I get frustrated with instructors that behave as though we have nothing else going on in our lives except their class and their assignments.
004 I don’t like to read material that doesn’t have a practical benefit. I want to leave here with a marketable skill, not a head filled with historical facts or scientific jargon.
005 Students who use the classroom to show how
**smart** they are and to
**build** themselves up.
**|**
Those who rattle their candy and gum wrappers or chip bags.
006 When required readings are not available.
**|**
When instructors put-down students.
**|**
When assignments are too difficult.
007 Professor who believe their view is the
**only** one acceptable.
**|** Disorganized classes.
**|** Dry readings.
008 Professors who are condescending toward students.
**|** Test questions that come out of the blue.
009 People make noise – opening snacks, chewing loud (pretzels).
**|** When people monopolize class.
010 Allowing personal bias to dictate evaluations of students work. (e.g., If you disagree, then you’re wrong.)
**|** When expectations for grades are unclear.
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Course Requirements**
**01** = Can’t locate required readings
**02** =
_Unclear_ expectations of students
**03** =
_Unrealistic_ expectations of students (e.g., too many readings, assignments too difficult)
**04** = Working in groups (e.g., too much, meaningless)
**05** = Course doesn’t follow syllabus
**Course Content**
**06** = Content of required readings (e.g., irrelevant, inappropriate, boring, dry)
**07** = No clinical, policy or real-life application of course content
**08** = Assignments not geared to learning (e.g., busy work)
**09** = Too little time spent on the most important topics
**Teacher – Student Relationship**
**10** = Teacher doesn’t encourage students to voice opinions that are different from their own
**11** = Teacher talks down to students (e.g., condescending, makes students feel stupid)
**12** = Teacher has low expectations of students (e.g., intelligence, experience, ability to complete assignments)
**Teaching Behavior**
**13** = Assignments returned without comments or feedback (e.g., papers)
**14** = Personality of teacher (e.g., opinionated, egotistical, arrogant, thinks their approach is the only way)
**15** = Unfair or inappropriate grading (e.g., papers, exams, final grades)
**16** = Poor facilitator of class discussions
**Student Behavior**
**17** = Students who monopolize class time
**18** = Irrelevant comments or discussions by other students (e.g., personal stories)
**19** = Limited or no development of peer relationships with classmates
**20** = Overbearing, intimidating, and/or opinionated students
**21** = Students making noises in class (e.g., rattling papers, unwrapping food)
**98** = Other: Student’s written response not a pet peeve or doesn’t fit coding scheme
**99** = Unable to decipher meaning of student response
## **Week 10: Qualitative Coding Assignment**
## **Code Sheet: Student Pet Peeve Data**
**Qualitative Analyses:** The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each student’s narrative and then code its content using the thematic categories on page 4 (Coding Scheme: Student Pet Peeve Data). Once you have completed the coding, you will need to describe the most common types of “pet peeves” that students have about their courses.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **ID #** | **CODE 1** | **CODE 2** | **CODE 3** |
| 001 | | | |
| 002 | | | |
| 003 | | | |
| 004 | | | |
| 005 | | | |
| 006 | | | |
| 007 | | | |
| 008 | | | |
| 009 | | | |
| 010 | | | |
After you complete the code sheet,
**summarize the major themes** or most common pet peeves described by the 10 students in their previous courses:
– 1
– 2