Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Education homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Compensations and Benefits

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Screenshot2025-06-09034601.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09034601-png-10316283 "Screenshot2025-06-09034601.png") \ Screenshot2025-06-09034849.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09034849-png-10316285 "Screenshot2025-06-09034849.png") \ Screenshot202…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Screenshot2025-06-09034601.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09034601-png-10316283 "Screenshot2025-06-09034601.png")
    \
    Screenshot2025-06-09034849.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09034849-png-10316285 "Screenshot2025-06-09034849.png")
    \
    Screenshot2025-06-09034947.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09034947-png-10316287 "Screenshot2025-06-09034947.png")
    \
    Screenshot2025-06-09035016.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-06-09035016-png-10316289 "Screenshot2025-06-09035016.png")

  • [Solved] Edit and revise

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please revise my work and make sure it sounds good with no ai detection from turnitin – ## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx** ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please revise my work and make sure it sounds good with no ai detection from turnitin

    – ## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx

    **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx**

    ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment in the United States**

    Bayley Mabryn Askin

    Department of Psychology, William Carey University

    PSY-410 Abnormal Psychology

    Dr. Richard Sheridan

    May 28, 2025

    **Introduction**

    Mental health diagnosis and treatments in the United States have evolved significantly from the 1800s to now. They have led to shifts in scientific perspectives and societal views while also increasing attention to mental health as a crucial aspect of public well-being. Each century has introduced new diagnoses, methods of treatment, as well as explanatory models for mental disorder, filtered through the complex interaction of cultural norms, medical technology, as well as politics. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the primary mental health diagnosis and treatment in the 1800s, the 1900s, as well as the 21st century. It also explains the way in which mental health practice reflects wider society values as well as scientific advancement, and evaluates the advancement as well as the limits of the current mental health treatment system.

    **Mental Illness in the 1800s**

    In the 19th century, mental illness was stigmatized and not understood. The prevailing model explained mental illness as a deviation from moral or religious beliefs, as opposed to an actual medical issue. Diagnoses relied less on reality than on behavioral observation and subject interpretation. The "diagnoses" of "melancholia," "mania," "hysteria," "dementia praecox," and "moral insanity" were often said. These diagnoses included symptoms ranging from depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and violent acts. Diagnosis varied without standardization, using gender, race, and class biases in the interpretations.

    Treatment during the time was inadequate, unsystematized, and inhumane. In the past, when it came to handling individuals struggling with health issues, they were often placed into asylums or almshouses for care and treatment. However, these asylums, initially intended as places of sanctuary, ended up overcrowded and lacking in resources, leading to uncaring conditions. The personnel frequently had little or no training, and patients were often physically restrained, isolated, and punished. Despite these horrible surroundings, the "moral treatment" movement started to emerge and brought attention to kindness, routine regimes, work therapy, and religious instruction. Reformers like Dorothea Dix fought for the cause of improved treatment as well as the establishment of state-owned asylums. She was the force behind the establishment of many institutions all over the nation.

    Medical interventions were primitive and frequently harmful. Often, clinicians would use ancient ideas like bloodletting, purging, and blistering on patients. To tranquilize them, they also used electroconvulsion, restraints, and ice baths. The overall understanding of mental sickness had an absolute basis in spiritual failure or in character weakness, which further ingrained stigma and largely resulted in prolonged institutionalization.

    **Mental Health in the 1900s**

    The 20th century was a defining period for the history of mental health treatment. As psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience developed, the explanations for mental illness became more scientific and medical. Diagnoses became standardized, particularly with the release of diagnostic manuals like the DSM-I in 1952. Schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder today), neuroses, and personality disorders received clinical characterization. While institutionalization remained widespread in the early decades of the century, the nature of diagnosis and treatment started to shift.

    Psychoanalysis was a prevailing theoretical framework in the early 1900s. Sigmund Freud focused his concepts with respect to unconscious conflict, early experience, and verbal therapy as a means of cure. Despite the controversy that has long surrounded it, the therapeutic ideal fashioned by psychoanalysis had an impact well into the mid-20th century in diagnosis and treatment. The new psychotropic drugs in the 1950s, like chlorpromazine (Thorazine), revolutionized treatment since they brought relief from symptoms in diseases like schizophrenia. Advances in pharmacology allowed numerous patients to move from institutional to community living.

    The deinstitutionalization process, spurred by human as well as financial considerations, sped up in the 1970s as well as the 1960s. Legislation such as the Community Mental Health Act in 1963 targeted the replacement of state hospitals with community mental health center services. Even as the shift in the delivery mode of care was profound, the process was underfinanced as well as inadequately planned. The consequence was the inability to render adequate care to many people suffering from severe mental illness. This made homelessness, as well as incarceration, increase in this population group.

    New therapies appeared in the latter half of the century. Cognitive, humanistic, and behavioral therapies expanded the base of therapies. Advances in the areas of the genetic basis, brain imaging, and functions of neurotransmitters provided the biological underpinnings of many mental illnesses. Therapies for mental illness remained fragmented, but inequality in the quality as well as quantity of care extended beyond racial, socioeconomic, and geographic boundaries.

    **Mental Health in the 2000s**

    Mental healthcare in the 21st century has seen unprecedented developments in mental illness understanding, diagnosis, and treatment. The DSM-5 was published in 2013 with new criteria and an inclusive framework for categories like autism spectrum disorder and expanded definitions under PTSD and depressive disorders. There started awareness, activism, and media coverage, which has reduced stigmatization, although it continues to exist in some of the population.

    Treatment is now characterized by involvement of biological, psychological, as well as social aspects with biopsychosocial treatment. Medicinal treatment is characterized by the emergence of newer-generation medications with higher efficacy with less burden of side effects, like newer antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. Evidence-based therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or CBT with modifications, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), as well as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), are utilized en masse in the treatment of all forms of mental disorders.

    Technology has also played a role in transforming the mental healthcare field. Telehealth services expanded the reach of care even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic as patients received therapy and medication management from their homes. Web-based support groups and mobile mental health apps provide additional self-management tools and support from similar individuals. Bad digital privacy, low-quality care, and disparities in digital access are often-seen challenges.

    There has also been growing emphasis placed on trauma-informed care, cultural competency, and integration of mental and physical health care. Providers are recently realizing the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), systemic racism, and the social determinants of health on mental health. Despite these developments, the mental health care system is still fighting against insurance limitations, waits, and shortages of staff, particularly in rural areas.

    Public policy initiatives such as the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act have attempted to expand coverage and access to treatment. The problem is, implementation is based on the state, and many are still choosing not to provide adequate care. Efforts are still ongoing to train different cultural providers, integrate the health systems, and expand programs.

    **Conclusion**

    The history of diagnosis and treatment of mental illness in America is one of multidimensional, shifting dynamics with science, culture, and public policy. From asylums and aversive therapies in the early-to-mid-1800s to biomedical technologies to cyber interventions in the early-21st century, mental health care has come to be more humane and research-based. Each century has had its achievements but also its setbacks, illustrating the continuing need for advocacy, research, and policy reform. Despite the important advances in care and understanding of mental illness, system barriers persist in the way in which people access and experience equity in mental health care. Corrections to these disparities require an integrated strategy to education, facilities in healthcare, legal reform, and community involvement. As we grow more sensitive to the nuances of mental health, we need to build the system so it honors early intervention, coordinated care, and the human dignity of all individuals.

    **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx**

    ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment in the United States**

    Bayley Mabryn Askin

    Department of Psychology, William Carey University

    PSY-410 Abnormal Psychology

    Dr. Richard Sheridan

    May 28, 2025

    **Introduction**

    Mental health diagnosis and treatments in the United States have evolved significantly from the 1800s to now. They have led to shifts in scientific perspectives and societal views while also increasing attention to mental health as a crucial aspect of public well-being. Each century has introduced new diagnoses, methods of treatment, as well as explanatory models for mental disorder, filtered through the complex interaction of cultural norms, medical technology, as well as politics. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the primary mental health diagnosis and treatment in the 1800s, the 1900s, as well as the 21st century. It also explains the way in which mental health practice reflects wider society values as well as scientific advancement, and evaluates the advancement as well as the limits of the current mental health treatment system.

    **Mental Illness in the 1800s**

    In the 19th century, mental illness was stigmatized and not understood. The prevailing model explained mental illness as a deviation from moral or religious beliefs, as opposed to an actual medical issue. Diagnoses relied less on reality than on behavioral observation and subject interpretation. The "diagnoses" of "melancholia," "mania," "hysteria," "dementia praecox," and "moral insanity" were often said. These diagnoses included symptoms ranging from depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and violent acts. Diagnosis varied without standardization, using gender, race, and class biases in the interpretations.

    Treatment during the time was inadequate, unsystematized, and inhumane. In the past, when it came to handling individuals struggling with health issues, they were often placed into asylums or almshouses for care and treatment. However, these asylums, initially intended as places of sanctuary, ended up overcrowded and lacking in resources, leading to uncaring conditions. The personnel frequently had little or no training, and patients were often physically restrained, isolated, and punished. Despite these horrible surroundings, the "moral treatment" movement started to emerge and brought attention to kindness, routine regimes, work therapy, and religious instruction. Reformers like Dorothea Dix fought for the cause of improved treatment as well as the establishment of state-owned asylums. She was the force behind the establishment of many institutions all over the nation.

    Medical interventions were primitive and frequently harmful. Often, clinicians would use ancient ideas like bloodletting, purging, and blistering on patients. To tranquilize them, they also used electroconvulsion, restraints, and ice baths. The overall understanding of mental sickness had an absolute basis in spiritual failure or in character weakness, which further ingrained stigma and largely resulted in prolonged institutionalization.

    **Mental Health in the 1900s**

    The 20th century was a defining period for the history of mental health treatment. As psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience developed, the explanations for mental illness became more scientific and medical. Diagnoses became standardized, particularly with the release of diagnostic manuals like the DSM-I in 1952. Schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder today), neuroses, and personality disorders received clinical characterization. While institutionalization remained widespread in the early decades of the century, the nature of diagnosis and treatment started to shift.

    Psychoanalysis was a prevailing theoretical framework in the early 1900s. Sigmund Freud focused his concepts with respect to unconscious conflict, early experience, and verbal therapy as a means of cure. Despite the controversy that has long surrounded it, the therapeutic ideal fashioned by psychoanalysis had an impact well into the mid-20th century in diagnosis and treatment. The new psychotropic drugs in the 1950s, like chlorpromazine (Thorazine), revolutionized treatment since they brought relief from symptoms in diseases like schizophrenia. Advances in pharmacology allowed numerous patients to move from institutional to community living.

    The deinstitutionalization process, spurred by human as well as financial considerations, sped up in the 1970s as well as the 1960s. Legislation such as the Community Mental Health Act in 1963 targeted the replacement of state hospitals with community mental health center services. Even as the shift in the delivery mode of care was profound, the process was underfinanced as well as inadequately planned. The consequence was the inability to render adequate care to many people suffering from severe mental illness. This made homelessness, as well as incarceration, increase in this population group.

    New therapies appeared in the latter half of the century. Cognitive, humanistic, and behavioral therapies expanded the base of therapies. Advances in the areas of the genetic basis, brain imaging, and functions of neurotransmitters provided the biological underpinnings of many mental illnesses. Therapies for mental illness remained fragmented, but inequality in the quality as well as quantity of care extended beyond racial, socioeconomic, and geographic boundaries.

    **Mental Health in the 2000s**

    Mental healthcare in the 21st century has seen unprecedented developments in mental illness understanding, diagnosis, and treatment. The DSM-5 was published in 2013 with new criteria and an inclusive framework for categories like autism spectrum disorder and expanded definitions under PTSD and depressive disorders. There started awareness, activism, and media coverage, which has reduced stigmatization, although it continues to exist in some of the population.

    Treatment is now characterized by involvement of biological, psychological, as well as social aspects with biopsychosocial treatment. Medicinal treatment is characterized by the emergence of newer-generation medications with higher efficacy with less burden of side effects, like newer antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. Evidence-based therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or CBT with modifications, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), as well as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), are utilized en masse in the treatment of all forms of mental disorders.

    Technology has also played a role in transforming the mental healthcare field. Telehealth services expanded the reach of care even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic as patients received therapy and medication management from their homes. Web-based support groups and mobile mental health apps provide additional self-management tools and support from similar individuals. Bad digital privacy, low-quality care, and disparities in digital access are often-seen challenges.

    There has also been growing emphasis placed on trauma-informed care, cultural competency, and integration of mental and physical health care. Providers are recently realizing the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), systemic racism, and the social determinants of health on mental health. Despite these developments, the mental health care system is still fighting against insurance limitations, waits, and shortages of staff, particularly in rural areas.

    Public policy initiatives such as the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act have attempted to expand coverage and access to treatment. The problem is, implementation is based on the state, and many are still choosing not to provide adequate care. Efforts are still ongoing to train different cultural providers, integrate the health systems, and expand programs.

    **Conclusion**

    The history of diagnosis and treatment of mental illness in America is one of multidimensional, shifting dynamics with science, culture, and public policy. From asylums and aversive therapies in the early-to-mid-1800s to biomedical technologies to cyber interventions in the early-21st century, mental health care has come to be more humane and research-based. Each century has had its achievements but also its setbacks, illustrating the continuing need for advocacy, research, and policy reform. Despite the important advances in care and understanding of mental illness, system barriers persist in the way in which people access and experience equity in mental health care. Corrections to these disparities require an integrated strategy to education, facilities in healthcare, legal reform, and community involvement. As we grow more sensitive to the nuances of mental health, we need to build the system so it honors early intervention, coordinated care, and the human dignity of all individuals.

  • [Solved] Inspire me!

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Apply leadership strategies to communicate with your team and inspire them through an email

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Apply leadership strategies to communicate with your team and inspire them through an email

  • [Solved] Edit and revise

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please change any ai detected and make it sound good – ## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx** ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment in the United State…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please change any ai detected and make it sound good

    – ## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx

    **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx**

    ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment in the United States**

    Bayley Mabryn Askin

    Department of Psychology, William Carey University

    PSY-410 Abnormal Psychology

    Dr. Richard Sheridan

    May 28, 2025

    **Introduction**

    Mental health diagnosis and treatments in the United States have evolved significantly from the 1800s to now. They have led to shifts in scientific perspectives and societal views while also increasing attention to mental health as a crucial aspect of public well-being. Each century has introduced new diagnoses, methods of treatment, as well as explanatory models for mental disorder, filtered through the complex interaction of cultural norms, medical technology, as well as politics. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the primary mental health diagnosis and treatment in the 1800s, the 1900s, as well as the 21st century. It also explains the way in which mental health practice reflects wider society values as well as scientific advancement, and evaluates the advancement as well as the limits of the current mental health treatment system.

    **Mental Illness in the 1800s**

    In the 19th century, mental illness was stigmatized and not understood. The prevailing model explained mental illness as a deviation from moral or religious beliefs, as opposed to an actual medical issue. Diagnoses relied less on reality than on behavioral observation and subject interpretation. The "diagnoses" of "melancholia," "mania," "hysteria," "dementia praecox," and "moral insanity" were often said. These diagnoses included symptoms ranging from depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and violent acts. Diagnosis varied without standardization, using gender, race, and class biases in the interpretations.

    Treatment during the time was inadequate, unsystematized, and inhumane. In the past, when it came to handling individuals struggling with health issues, they were often placed into asylums or almshouses for care and treatment. However, these asylums, initially intended as places of sanctuary, ended up overcrowded and lacking in resources, leading to uncaring conditions. The personnel frequently had little or no training, and patients were often physically restrained, isolated, and punished. Despite these horrible surroundings, the "moral treatment" movement started to emerge and brought attention to kindness, routine regimes, work therapy, and religious instruction. Reformers like Dorothea Dix fought for the cause of improved treatment as well as the establishment of state-owned asylums. She was the force behind the establishment of many institutions all over the nation.

    Medical interventions were primitive and frequently harmful. Often, clinicians would use ancient ideas like bloodletting, purging, and blistering on patients. To tranquilize them, they also used electroconvulsion, restraints, and ice baths. The overall understanding of mental sickness had an absolute basis in spiritual failure or in character weakness, which further ingrained stigma and largely resulted in prolonged institutionalization.

    **Mental Health in the 1900s**

    The 20th century was a defining period for the history of mental health treatment. As psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience developed, the explanations for mental illness became more scientific and medical. Diagnoses became standardized, particularly with the release of diagnostic manuals like the DSM-I in 1952. Schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder today), neuroses, and personality disorders received clinical characterization. While institutionalization remained widespread in the early decades of the century, the nature of diagnosis and treatment started to shift.

    Psychoanalysis was a prevailing theoretical framework in the early 1900s. Sigmund Freud focused his concepts with respect to unconscious conflict, early experience, and verbal therapy as a means of cure. Despite the controversy that has long surrounded it, the therapeutic ideal fashioned by psychoanalysis had an impact well into the mid-20th century in diagnosis and treatment. The new psychotropic drugs in the 1950s, like chlorpromazine (Thorazine), revolutionized treatment since they brought relief from symptoms in diseases like schizophrenia. Advances in pharmacology allowed numerous patients to move from institutional to community living.

    The deinstitutionalization process, spurred by human as well as financial considerations, sped up in the 1970s as well as the 1960s. Legislation such as the Community Mental Health Act in 1963 targeted the replacement of state hospitals with community mental health center services. Even as the shift in the delivery mode of care was profound, the process was underfinanced as well as inadequately planned. The consequence was the inability to render adequate care to many people suffering from severe mental illness. This made homelessness, as well as incarceration, increase in this population group.

    New therapies appeared in the latter half of the century. Cognitive, humanistic, and behavioral therapies expanded the base of therapies. Advances in the areas of the genetic basis, brain imaging, and functions of neurotransmitters provided the biological underpinnings of many mental illnesses. Therapies for mental illness remained fragmented, but inequality in the quality as well as quantity of care extended beyond racial, socioeconomic, and geographic boundaries.

    **Mental Health in the 2000s**

    Mental healthcare in the 21st century has seen unprecedented developments in mental illness understanding, diagnosis, and treatment. The DSM-5 was published in 2013 with new criteria and an inclusive framework for categories like autism spectrum disorder and expanded definitions under PTSD and depressive disorders. There started awareness, activism, and media coverage, which has reduced stigmatization, although it continues to exist in some of the population.

    Treatment is now characterized by involvement of biological, psychological, as well as social aspects with biopsychosocial treatment. Medicinal treatment is characterized by the emergence of newer-generation medications with higher efficacy with less burden of side effects, like newer antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. Evidence-based therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or CBT with modifications, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), as well as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), are utilized en masse in the treatment of all forms of mental disorders.

    Technology has also played a role in transforming the mental healthcare field. Telehealth services expanded the reach of care even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic as patients received therapy and medication management from their homes. Web-based support groups and mobile mental health apps provide additional self-management tools and support from similar individuals. Bad digital privacy, low-quality care, and disparities in digital access are often-seen challenges.

    There has also been growing emphasis placed on trauma-informed care, cultural competency, and integration of mental and physical health care. Providers are recently realizing the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), systemic racism, and the social determinants of health on mental health. Despite these developments, the mental health care system is still fighting against insurance limitations, waits, and shortages of staff, particularly in rural areas.

    Public policy initiatives such as the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act have attempted to expand coverage and access to treatment. The problem is, implementation is based on the state, and many are still choosing not to provide adequate care. Efforts are still ongoing to train different cultural providers, integrate the health systems, and expand programs.

    **Conclusion**

    The history of diagnosis and treatment of mental illness in America is one of multidimensional, shifting dynamics with science, culture, and public policy. From asylums and aversive therapies in the early-to-mid-1800s to biomedical technologies to cyber interventions in the early-21st century, mental health care has come to be more humane and research-based. Each century has had its achievements but also its setbacks, illustrating the continuing need for advocacy, research, and policy reform. Despite the important advances in care and understanding of mental illness, system barriers persist in the way in which people access and experience equity in mental health care. Corrections to these disparities require an integrated strategy to education, facilities in healthcare, legal reform, and community involvement. As we grow more sensitive to the nuances of mental health, we need to build the system so it honors early intervention, coordinated care, and the human dignity of all individuals.

    **## BayleyAskinTheHistoryofMentalHealthDiagnosisandTreatmentintheUnitedStates.docx**

    ## **The History of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment in the United States**

    Bayley Mabryn Askin

    Department of Psychology, William Carey University

    PSY-410 Abnormal Psychology

    Dr. Richard Sheridan

    May 28, 2025

    **Introduction**

    Mental health diagnosis and treatments in the United States have evolved significantly from the 1800s to now. They have led to shifts in scientific perspectives and societal views while also increasing attention to mental health as a crucial aspect of public well-being. Each century has introduced new diagnoses, methods of treatment, as well as explanatory models for mental disorder, filtered through the complex interaction of cultural norms, medical technology, as well as politics. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the primary mental health diagnosis and treatment in the 1800s, the 1900s, as well as the 21st century. It also explains the way in which mental health practice reflects wider society values as well as scientific advancement, and evaluates the advancement as well as the limits of the current mental health treatment system.

    **Mental Illness in the 1800s**

    In the 19th century, mental illness was stigmatized and not understood. The prevailing model explained mental illness as a deviation from moral or religious beliefs, as opposed to an actual medical issue. Diagnoses relied less on reality than on behavioral observation and subject interpretation. The "diagnoses" of "melancholia," "mania," "hysteria," "dementia praecox," and "moral insanity" were often said. These diagnoses included symptoms ranging from depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and violent acts. Diagnosis varied without standardization, using gender, race, and class biases in the interpretations.

    Treatment during the time was inadequate, unsystematized, and inhumane. In the past, when it came to handling individuals struggling with health issues, they were often placed into asylums or almshouses for care and treatment. However, these asylums, initially intended as places of sanctuary, ended up overcrowded and lacking in resources, leading to uncaring conditions. The personnel frequently had little or no training, and patients were often physically restrained, isolated, and punished. Despite these horrible surroundings, the "moral treatment" movement started to emerge and brought attention to kindness, routine regimes, work therapy, and religious instruction. Reformers like Dorothea Dix fought for the cause of improved treatment as well as the establishment of state-owned asylums. She was the force behind the establishment of many institutions all over the nation.

    Medical interventions were primitive and frequently harmful. Often, clinicians would use ancient ideas like bloodletting, purging, and blistering on patients. To tranquilize them, they also used electroconvulsion, restraints, and ice baths. The overall understanding of mental sickness had an absolute basis in spiritual failure or in character weakness, which further ingrained stigma and largely resulted in prolonged institutionalization.

    **Mental Health in the 1900s**

    The 20th century was a defining period for the history of mental health treatment. As psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience developed, the explanations for mental illness became more scientific and medical. Diagnoses became standardized, particularly with the release of diagnostic manuals like the DSM-I in 1952. Schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder today), neuroses, and personality disorders received clinical characterization. While institutionalization remained widespread in the early decades of the century, the nature of diagnosis and treatment started to shift.

    Psychoanalysis was a prevailing theoretical framework in the early 1900s. Sigmund Freud focused his concepts with respect to unconscious conflict, early experience, and verbal therapy as a means of cure. Despite the controversy that has long surrounded it, the therapeutic ideal fashioned by psychoanalysis had an impact well into the mid-20th century in diagnosis and treatment. The new psychotropic drugs in the 1950s, like chlorpromazine (Thorazine), revolutionized treatment since they brought relief from symptoms in diseases like schizophrenia. Advances in pharmacology allowed numerous patients to move from institutional to community living.

    The deinstitutionalization process, spurred by human as well as financial considerations, sped up in the 1970s as well as the 1960s. Legislation such as the Community Mental Health Act in 1963 targeted the replacement of state hospitals with community mental health center services. Even as the shift in the delivery mode of care was profound, the process was underfinanced as well as inadequately planned. The consequence was the inability to render adequate care to many people suffering from severe mental illness. This made homelessness, as well as incarceration, increase in this population group.

    New therapies appeared in the latter half of the century. Cognitive, humanistic, and behavioral therapies expanded the base of therapies. Advances in the areas of the genetic basis, brain imaging, and functions of neurotransmitters provided the biological underpinnings of many mental illnesses. Therapies for mental illness remained fragmented, but inequality in the quality as well as quantity of care extended beyond racial, socioeconomic, and geographic boundaries.

    **Mental Health in the 2000s**

    Mental healthcare in the 21st century has seen unprecedented developments in mental illness understanding, diagnosis, and treatment. The DSM-5 was published in 2013 with new criteria and an inclusive framework for categories like autism spectrum disorder and expanded definitions under PTSD and depressive disorders. There started awareness, activism, and media coverage, which has reduced stigmatization, although it continues to exist in some of the population.

    Treatment is now characterized by involvement of biological, psychological, as well as social aspects with biopsychosocial treatment. Medicinal treatment is characterized by the emergence of newer-generation medications with higher efficacy with less burden of side effects, like newer antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. Evidence-based therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or CBT with modifications, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), as well as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), are utilized en masse in the treatment of all forms of mental disorders.

    Technology has also played a role in transforming the mental healthcare field. Telehealth services expanded the reach of care even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic as patients received therapy and medication management from their homes. Web-based support groups and mobile mental health apps provide additional self-management tools and support from similar individuals. Bad digital privacy, low-quality care, and disparities in digital access are often-seen challenges.

    There has also been growing emphasis placed on trauma-informed care, cultural competency, and integration of mental and physical health care. Providers are recently realizing the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), systemic racism, and the social determinants of health on mental health. Despite these developments, the mental health care system is still fighting against insurance limitations, waits, and shortages of staff, particularly in rural areas.

    Public policy initiatives such as the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act have attempted to expand coverage and access to treatment. The problem is, implementation is based on the state, and many are still choosing not to provide adequate care. Efforts are still ongoing to train different cultural providers, integrate the health systems, and expand programs.

    **Conclusion**

    The history of diagnosis and treatment of mental illness in America is one of multidimensional, shifting dynamics with science, culture, and public policy. From asylums and aversive therapies in the early-to-mid-1800s to biomedical technologies to cyber interventions in the early-21st century, mental health care has come to be more humane and research-based. Each century has had its achievements but also its setbacks, illustrating the continuing need for advocacy, research, and policy reform. Despite the important advances in care and understanding of mental illness, system barriers persist in the way in which people access and experience equity in mental health care. Corrections to these disparities require an integrated strategy to education, facilities in healthcare, legal reform, and community involvement. As we grow more sensitive to the nuances of mental health, we need to build the system so it honors early intervention, coordinated care, and the human dignity of all individuals.

  • [Solved] Adding on the first

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Adding on the first.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Case study 1-2 – ## casestudypaper.docx **## casestudypaper.docx** **Case Study Analysis -** Due Sunday, March 23rd In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric. See the at…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Case study 1-2

    – ## casestudypaper.docx

    **## casestudypaper.docx**

    **Case Study Analysis -** Due Sunday, March 23rd

    In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail.

    You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers.

    Follow APA guidelines.

    Follow the grading rubric.

    See the attached MSN template

    **Use the following information to formulate your analysis**

    Maria Lopez is a 16-year-old Hispanic female who presents to the clinic accompanied by her mother.

    **HPI:** Persistent wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and intermittent coughing that worsens during the night and with physical activity. These symptoms have occurred consistently for over a month. Her mother reports that Maria has missed several school days and has declining grades, attributed to fatigue and disrupted sleep. Maria mentions
    waking up “gasping” several nights a week.

    She reports recent nasal congestion and sore throat, with an oxygen saturation of 94% on room air.

    The family lives in a small, poorly ventilated apartment in an urban area with high traffic pollution. A wood-burning stove is used for heating. Two household members smoke indoors. Although Maria is a nonsmoker, she reports that her symptoms worsen after time spent in common areas.

    **Physical Exam:** Audible wheezing, mild intercostal retractions, and a prolonged expiratory phase. A peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is 60% of her personal best.

    **Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study.**

    Explain pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for the patient symptoms and why patient is susceptible to more frequent infections.
    Explain the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of how smoking can lead to the changes seen in the lungs.
    Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
    Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of COPD.

    Rubric

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for the patient symptoms and why patient is susceptible to more frequent infections.

    Explain the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of how smoking can lead to the changes seen in the lungs.

    Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. — Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of COPD.

    Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.

    Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

    **## casestudypaper.docx**

    **Case Study Analysis -** Due Sunday, March 23rd

    In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail.

    You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers.

    Follow APA guidelines.

    Follow the grading rubric.

    See the attached MSN template

    **Use the following information to formulate your analysis**

    Maria Lopez is a 16-year-old Hispanic female who presents to the clinic accompanied by her mother.

    **HPI:** Persistent wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and intermittent coughing that worsens during the night and with physical activity. These symptoms have occurred consistently for over a month. Her mother reports that Maria has missed several school days and has declining grades, attributed to fatigue and disrupted sleep. Maria mentions
    waking up “gasping” several nights a week.

    She reports recent nasal congestion and sore throat, with an oxygen saturation of 94% on room air.

    The family lives in a small, poorly ventilated apartment in an urban area with high traffic pollution. A wood-burning stove is used for heating. Two household members smoke indoors. Although Maria is a nonsmoker, she reports that her symptoms worsen after time spent in common areas.

    **Physical Exam:** Audible wheezing, mild intercostal retractions, and a prolonged expiratory phase. A peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is 60% of her personal best.

    **Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study.**

    Explain pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for the patient symptoms and why patient is susceptible to more frequent infections.
    Explain the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of how smoking can lead to the changes seen in the lungs.
    Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
    Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of COPD.

    Rubric

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for the patient symptoms and why patient is susceptible to more frequent infections.

    Explain the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of how smoking can lead to the changes seen in the lungs.

    Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. — Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of COPD.

    Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.

    Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

  • [Solved] IHP 604 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering IHP 604 Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion board Replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## DiscussionResponsePost.docx **## DiscussionResponsePost.docx** Post #1: Kyla Skiffer posted Jun 9, 2025 9:06 AM Title of Article- **_Changing Severity and Epidemiology of Adults Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States After Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccines, M…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## DiscussionResponsePost.docx

    **## DiscussionResponsePost.docx**

    Post #1:

    Kyla Skiffer posted Jun 9, 2025 9:06 AM

    Title of Article-
    **_Changing Severity and Epidemiology of Adults Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States After Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccines, March 2021-August 2022_**

    I found a recent peer-reviewed study published in
    _Clinical Infectious Diseases_ that looked at over 60,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations across 10 U.S. states between June 2021 and March 2023. The researchers analyzed how patient characteristics and outcomes changed during different pandemic waves, including Delta and Omicron variants. One of the most noticeable trends was that the average age of hospitalized patients increased significantly… from 60 to 75 years old. More of those hospitalized were vaccinated by the end of the study period (rising from 18% to over 70%).

    One of the key takeaways from the study was that patients with multiple chronic conditions, especially those with four or more, were at a much higher risk of severe outcomes like ICU admission or death- even if they were vaccinated. In fact, multimorbidity stood out as the strongest predictor of serious complications across the board.

    What surprised me most was that even vaccination didn’t fully protect people who had a lot of health issues. That made me think about how important it is to develop more targeted strategies for vulnerable groups. In the future, I think research should focus on how combinations of chronic conditions influence COVID outcomes and what kinds of early interventions can help reduce those risks.

    References: Griggs EP, Mitchell PK, Lazariu V, Gaglani M, McEvoy CT, et al. Changing severity and epidemiology of adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States after introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, March 2021–March 2023.
    _Clin Infect Dis_. 2023;78(2):338–348. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37255285/

    *What is your personal opinion on vaccination and whether or not you are for or against mandatory vaccination and why?:

    Personally, I’m very much in favor of vaccines! I really believe they’re one of the most effective tools we have to protect individual and the general public health. Vaccines have played a huge role in reducing… and in some cases nearly eliminating… diseases that used to be devastating or even deadly. I trust the science behind them and also recognize the extensive testing and regulation that goes into ensuring their safety. I see vaccinations as a responsible and compassionate choice- not just for my own health, but for the well-being of others around me, too.

    Reply to this post:

    Post #2:

    Ashjan Abdulsalam posted Jun 17, 2025 8:42 PM

    **Topic Selected:** Epidemiology
    **Title of Article:** Epidemiology of respiratory pathogens in patients with acute respiratory infections during the COVID‐19 pandemic and after easing of COVID‐19 restrictions.

    **The results of a study in that area?**

    · The study included a total of 6,633 patients with acute respiratory infections (ARIs). There were 3.8999 males and 2,734. No significant yearly differences in gender (P > 0.05). The median age overall is 58 years. The study shows that the number of ARI cases increased significantly post-COVID. In 2021, there were 1,180 cases, in 2022, 1,161 cases, and in 2023, 4,292 cases.

    **Summarize the article.**

    · The article shows that the infections with several respiratory pathogens (bacteria and viruses) increased significantly after COVID-19. The public health measures taken during COVID-19 may have reduced other respiratory diseases in addition to lowering the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Post COVID-19, the cases of Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) started to increase.

    **Note the most interesting thing you learned from the article?**

    · The most interesting thing I learned from the article was the results of the study. During COVID, no one really was talking about any other respiratory disease or how COVID has helped to decrease the number of other respiratory diseases. I thought it was interesting to learn that the measurements that were taken during COVID helped identify other respiratory diseases.

    **Discuss future implications or directions for study for the area you chose?**

    · I believe that for future studies, they should discuss whether there is any recommendation for vaccines and the benefits and effects. Also discussing ways to support ARI prevention and control will come.

    **3. To end (and to elicit a lively discussion), without researching the topic, give your personal opinion on mandatory vaccinations for communicable diseases and whether or not you are for or against them, and why.**

    When it comes to mandatory vaccinations, I support them with the thought that whoever creates them is thorough and confident in their end result. Vaccinations, which are injected into the human body, should be taken very seriously because they can have lasting effects on the person. This being said, new vaccinations should not be released to the public until extensive research and testing are done. I understand vaccines were needed quickly for COVID-19; however, I do not agree with how quickly and easily people were able to receive them after so little time. As a result, certain vaccinations caused complications for many people who thought they were getting a safe and certified vaccine.

    Reply to this post:

    **## DiscussionResponsePost.docx**

    Post #1:

    Kyla Skiffer posted Jun 9, 2025 9:06 AM

    Title of Article-
    **_Changing Severity and Epidemiology of Adults Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States After Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccines, March 2021-August 2022_**

    I found a recent peer-reviewed study published in
    _Clinical Infectious Diseases_ that looked at over 60,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations across 10 U.S. states between June 2021 and March 2023. The researchers analyzed how patient characteristics and outcomes changed during different pandemic waves, including Delta and Omicron variants. One of the most noticeable trends was that the average age of hospitalized patients increased significantly… from 60 to 75 years old. More of those hospitalized were vaccinated by the end of the study period (rising from 18% to over 70%).

    One of the key takeaways from the study was that patients with multiple chronic conditions, especially those with four or more, were at a much higher risk of severe outcomes like ICU admission or death- even if they were vaccinated. In fact, multimorbidity stood out as the strongest predictor of serious complications across the board.

    What surprised me most was that even vaccination didn’t fully protect people who had a lot of health issues. That made me think about how important it is to develop more targeted strategies for vulnerable groups. In the future, I think research should focus on how combinations of chronic conditions influence COVID outcomes and what kinds of early interventions can help reduce those risks.

    References: Griggs EP, Mitchell PK, Lazariu V, Gaglani M, McEvoy CT, et al. Changing severity and epidemiology of adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States after introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, March 2021–March 2023.
    _Clin Infect Dis_. 2023;78(2):338–348. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37255285/

    *What is your personal opinion on vaccination and whether or not you are for or against mandatory vaccination and why?:

    Personally, I’m very much in favor of vaccines! I really believe they’re one of the most effective tools we have to protect individual and the general public health. Vaccines have played a huge role in reducing… and in some cases nearly eliminating… diseases that used to be devastating or even deadly. I trust the science behind them and also recognize the extensive testing and regulation that goes into ensuring their safety. I see vaccinations as a responsible and compassionate choice- not just for my own health, but for the well-being of others around me, too.

    Reply to this post:

    Post #2:

    Ashjan Abdulsalam posted Jun 17, 2025 8:42 PM

    **Topic Selected:** Epidemiology
    **Title of Article:** Epidemiology of respiratory pathogens in patients with acute respiratory infections during the COVID‐19 pandemic and after easing of COVID‐19 restrictions.

    **The results of a study in that area?**

    · The study included a total of 6,633 patients with acute respiratory infections (ARIs). There were 3.8999 males and 2,734. No significant yearly differences in gender (P > 0.05). The median age overall is 58 years. The study shows that the number of ARI cases increased significantly post-COVID. In 2021, there were 1,180 cases, in 2022, 1,161 cases, and in 2023, 4,292 cases.

    **Summarize the article.**

    · The article shows that the infections with several respiratory pathogens (bacteria and viruses) increased significantly after COVID-19. The public health measures taken during COVID-19 may have reduced other respiratory diseases in addition to lowering the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Post COVID-19, the cases of Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) started to increase.

    **Note the most interesting thing you learned from the article?**

    · The most interesting thing I learned from the article was the results of the study. During COVID, no one really was talking about any other respiratory disease or how COVID has helped to decrease the number of other respiratory diseases. I thought it was interesting to learn that the measurements that were taken during COVID helped identify other respiratory diseases.

    **Discuss future implications or directions for study for the area you chose?**

    · I believe that for future studies, they should discuss whether there is any recommendation for vaccines and the benefits and effects. Also discussing ways to support ARI prevention and control will come.

    **3. To end (and to elicit a lively discussion), without researching the topic, give your personal opinion on mandatory vaccinations for communicable diseases and whether or not you are for or against them, and why.**

    When it comes to mandatory vaccinations, I support them with the thought that whoever creates them is thorough and confident in their end result. Vaccinations, which are injected into the human body, should be taken very seriously because they can have lasting effects on the person. This being said, new vaccinations should not be released to the public until extensive research and testing are done. I understand vaccines were needed quickly for COVID-19; however, I do not agree with how quickly and easily people were able to receive them after so little time. As a result, certain vaccinations caused complications for many people who thought they were getting a safe and certified vaccine.

    Reply to this post: