My Blog

Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] analyze how culture affects communication

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Explore how culture influences communication by analyzing a real or fictional interaction between individuals from different cultural backgrounds.** Reflect on how expectations, misunderstandings, or cultural norms shaped the communication. Use examples—from personal experience, media, or fictiona…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Explore how culture influences communication by analyzing a real or fictional interaction between individuals from different cultural backgrounds.** Reflect on how expectations, misunderstandings, or cultural norms shaped the communication. Use examples—from personal experience, media, or fictional characters—to support your observations. Be sure to organize your response clearly, with a strong main idea, supporting evidence, and a thoughtful conclusion. Include references and use current APA style.

  • [Solved] WK 9 DISC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## WK9DISCUSSION.docx **## WK9DISCUSSION.docx** 3 [Back to Week at a Glance](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883511) Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security ![A close-up of a lock AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-disc) In re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## WK9DISCUSSION.docx

    **## WK9DISCUSSION.docx**

    3

    [Back to Week at a Glance](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883511)

    Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security

    ![A close-up of a lock AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-disc)

    In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing an identity. Thus, healthcare organizations have made it a priority to protect patient records and privacy. However, with the influx of technological advancements and hacker determination, there is no perfect way to ensure that all records are secure and safe.

    In addition to medical records, privacy concerns are relevant with any patient chart in any setting. For example, a chart left open on a computer monitor in a patient room, employee passwords and log-in information, and new employee access and screening all represent other ways in which ethics and security merge in healthcare and nursing practice.

    For this Discussion, you will consider the importance of ethics as it relates to security. You will also reflect on how these topics might affect clinical practice and the connection to nursing informatics.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883520)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · American Nurses Association. (2015).
    [_Nursing informaticsLinks to an external site._](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1021761&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) _: Scope and standards of practice_  (2nd ed.).

    · “Ethics in Nursing Informatics” (pp. 49–52)

    · “Standard 6: “Evaluation” (p. 78)

    · “Standard 7: “Ethics” (pp. 79–80)

    · “Standard 11: “Communication” (p. 86)

    · “Standard 12: “Leadership” (pp. 87–88)

    · Beckmann, M., Dittmer, K., Jaschke, J., Karbach, U., Köberlein-Neu, J., Nocon, M., Rusniok, C., Wurster, F., & Pfaff, H. (2021).
    [Electronic patient record and its effects on social aspects of interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows in hospitals (eCoCo): A mixed methods study protocolLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=33892703&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200).
    _BMC Health Services Research, 21_ (377). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06377-5

    · Goodman K. W. (2020).
    [Ethics in health informaticsLinks to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442522).
    _Yearbook of Medical Informatics_,
    _29_(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701966

    [Required Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · TEDx Talks. (2023, July 7).
    [_Navigating the AI future of health care | Benjamin Collins | TEDx Vanderbilt University_ Links to an external site.](https://youtu.be/gsAlpElHyN0?si=wbomeiUQAlRdFeyk) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/gsAlpElHyN0?si=wbomeiUQAlRdFeyk

    [Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · Simplilearn. (2020, June 10).
    [_Cyber security in 7 minutes_ | \
    _What is cyber security: How it works?_ | \
    _Cyber security_ | \
    _Simplilearn_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inWWhr5tnEA)
    [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inWWhr5tnEA

    To Prepare

    · Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics of ethics, cyber ethics, and security.

    · Consider the role of each of these topics for clinical practice, as well as the importance of understanding each of these topics.

    By Day 3 of Week 9

    **Post** a cohesive response to the following:

    · What are the key challenges that healthcare practitioners encounter when balancing patient care with the requirement for stringent data protection? How can healthcare organizations ensure patient confidentiality while effectively leveraging digital tools to enhance care delivery?

    By Day 6 of Week 9

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK9DISCUSSION.docx**

    3

    [Back to Week at a Glance](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883511)

    Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security

    ![A close-up of a lock AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-disc)

    In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing an identity. Thus, healthcare organizations have made it a priority to protect patient records and privacy. However, with the influx of technological advancements and hacker determination, there is no perfect way to ensure that all records are secure and safe.

    In addition to medical records, privacy concerns are relevant with any patient chart in any setting. For example, a chart left open on a computer monitor in a patient room, employee passwords and log-in information, and new employee access and screening all represent other ways in which ethics and security merge in healthcare and nursing practice.

    For this Discussion, you will consider the importance of ethics as it relates to security. You will also reflect on how these topics might affect clinical practice and the connection to nursing informatics.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883520)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · American Nurses Association. (2015).
    [_Nursing informaticsLinks to an external site._](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1021761&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) _: Scope and standards of practice_  (2nd ed.).

    · “Ethics in Nursing Informatics” (pp. 49–52)

    · “Standard 6: “Evaluation” (p. 78)

    · “Standard 7: “Ethics” (pp. 79–80)

    · “Standard 11: “Communication” (p. 86)

    · “Standard 12: “Leadership” (pp. 87–88)

    · Beckmann, M., Dittmer, K., Jaschke, J., Karbach, U., Köberlein-Neu, J., Nocon, M., Rusniok, C., Wurster, F., & Pfaff, H. (2021).
    [Electronic patient record and its effects on social aspects of interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows in hospitals (eCoCo): A mixed methods study protocolLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=33892703&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200).
    _BMC Health Services Research, 21_ (377). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06377-5

    · Goodman K. W. (2020).
    [Ethics in health informaticsLinks to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442522).
    _Yearbook of Medical Informatics_,
    _29_(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701966

    [Required Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · TEDx Talks. (2023, July 7).
    [_Navigating the AI future of health care | Benjamin Collins | TEDx Vanderbilt University_ Links to an external site.](https://youtu.be/gsAlpElHyN0?si=wbomeiUQAlRdFeyk) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/gsAlpElHyN0?si=wbomeiUQAlRdFeyk

    [Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=6883520)

    · Simplilearn. (2020, June 10).
    [_Cyber security in 7 minutes_ | \
    _What is cyber security: How it works?_ | \
    _Cyber security_ | \
    _Simplilearn_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inWWhr5tnEA)
    [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inWWhr5tnEA

    To Prepare

    · Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics of ethics, cyber ethics, and security.

    · Consider the role of each of these topics for clinical practice, as well as the importance of understanding each of these topics.

    By Day 3 of Week 9

    **Post** a cohesive response to the following:

    · What are the key challenges that healthcare practitioners encounter when balancing patient care with the requirement for stringent data protection? How can healthcare organizations ensure patient confidentiality while effectively leveraging digital tools to enhance care delivery?

    By Day 6 of Week 9

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached for instructions – ## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf – ## Instructions.Assessment3.docx **## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf** 1 Assessment 04 – Remote Collaboration and Ev…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached for instructions

    – ## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf

    – ## Instructions.Assessment3.docx

    **## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 04 –

    Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care

    Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence-
    based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine
    how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first review the case study
    below.

    INTRODUCTION

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung disease that causes
    restricted airflow and breathing problems. Providing evidence-based care for COPD can be
    challenging, especially when care is being provided remotely. In this case study, we will observe
    how healthcare professionals collaborate remotely and virtually to provide care for a patient with
    COPD.

    PATIENT INFORMATION

    The patient is a 70-year-old male diagnosed with COPD. He lives in a rural area and has limited
    access to specialized pulmonary care. The patient experiences symptoms such as chronic
    cough, shortness of breath, and frequent respiratory infections.

    COLLABORATION PROCESS

    The patient's primary care nurse, Sarah, collaborates remotely with a team of healthcare
    professionals, including a pulmonologist, a respiratory therapist, and a pharmacist, to provide
    evidence-based care for COPD.

    • Sarah: "Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining this virtual meeting to discuss
    the care of our patient with COPD. Based on the patient's symptoms and medical
    history, I believe he would benefit from a comprehensive treatment plan. I would like to
    hear your input and recommendations."

    • Pulmonologist: "Thank you, Sarah. I have reviewed the patient's medical records and
    pulmonary function test results. I agree that the patient has COPD and requires a
    comprehensive treatment plan. I recommend initiating bronchodilator therapy, including
    long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, to improve his lung function and
    reduce symptoms."

    • Respiratory Therapist: "I have been conducting remote pulmonary rehabilitation
    sessions with the patient to improve his exercise capacity and quality of life. These

    2

    sessions include breathing exercises, physical activity guidance, and education on
    managing exacerbations. I have noticed significant improvements in the patient's
    exercise tolerance and breathlessness."

    • Pharmacist: "I have reviewed the patient's medication list and potential drug
    interactions. It is crucial to ensure that the patient understands the proper use of inhalers
    and medications, as well as the importance of adherence. I recommend providing
    education and counseling to the patient and his family on the correct inhaler technique
    and potential side effects."

    • Sarah: "Thank you all for your valuable input. I will incorporate your recommendations
    into the patient's treatment plan. Let's schedule regular virtual follow-up visits to monitor
    his progress, adjust medications if necessary, and provide ongoing support."

    Consider additional consultations that might be necessary as you develop your plan of care for
    this patient.

    **## Instructions.Assessment3.docx**

    **This assignment is a video, I need a script, per se to make the video**

    Propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Review the case study in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. You will use this case study as the focus for this assessment. (See Attachment)

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10-minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video:

    · Propose an evidence-based care plan that you believe will improve the safety and outcomes of the patient in the case study presented in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. Add your thoughts on what more could be done for the patient and what more information may have been needed.

    · Discuss the ways in which an EBP model and relevant evidence helped you to develop and make decisions about the plan you proposed

    · Wrap up your video by identifying the benefits of the remote collaboration in the scenario, as well as discuss strategies you found in the literature or best practices that could help mitigate or overcome one or more of the collaboration challenges you observed in the scenario.

    Be sure you mention any articles, authors, and other relevant sources of evidence that helped inform your video. Discuss why these sources of evidence are credible and relevant.
    **Important**: You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list of the sources you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. You are required to submit a narrative of all your video content to this assessment and to SafeAssign.

    Make sure that your video addresses the following grading criteria:

    · Propose your own evidence-based care plan to improve the safety and outcomes for a patient in the provided case study.

    · Explain the ways in which you used an EBP model to help develop your plan of care for the client.

    · Reflect on which evidence you found in your search that was most relevant and useful when making decisions regarding your care plan.

    · Identify benefits and strategies to mitigate the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team.

    · Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar, including a reference list formatted in current APA style.

    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    **DO NOT USE AI**

    **REFERENCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD**

    **## Instructions.Assessment3.docx**

    **This assignment is a video, I need a script, per se to make the video**

    Propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Review the case study in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. You will use this case study as the focus for this assessment. (See Attachment)

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10-minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video:

    · Propose an evidence-based care plan that you believe will improve the safety and outcomes of the patient in the case study presented in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. Add your thoughts on what more could be done for the patient and what more information may have been needed.

    · Discuss the ways in which an EBP model and relevant evidence helped you to develop and make decisions about the plan you proposed

    · Wrap up your video by identifying the benefits of the remote collaboration in the scenario, as well as discuss strategies you found in the literature or best practices that could help mitigate or overcome one or more of the collaboration challenges you observed in the scenario.

    Be sure you mention any articles, authors, and other relevant sources of evidence that helped inform your video. Discuss why these sources of evidence are credible and relevant.
    **Important**: You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list of the sources you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. You are required to submit a narrative of all your video content to this assessment and to SafeAssign.

    Make sure that your video addresses the following grading criteria:

    · Propose your own evidence-based care plan to improve the safety and outcomes for a patient in the provided case study.

    · Explain the ways in which you used an EBP model to help develop your plan of care for the client.

    · Reflect on which evidence you found in your search that was most relevant and useful when making decisions regarding your care plan.

    · Identify benefits and strategies to mitigate the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team.

    · Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar, including a reference list formatted in current APA style.

    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    **DO NOT USE AI**

    **REFERENCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD**

    **## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 04 –

    Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care

    Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence-
    based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine
    how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first review the case study
    below.

    INTRODUCTION

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung disease that causes
    restricted airflow and breathing problems. Providing evidence-based care for COPD can be
    challenging, especially when care is being provided remotely. In this case study, we will observe
    how healthcare professionals collaborate remotely and virtually to provide care for a patient with
    COPD.

    PATIENT INFORMATION

    The patient is a 70-year-old male diagnosed with COPD. He lives in a rural area and has limited
    access to specialized pulmonary care. The patient experiences symptoms such as chronic
    cough, shortness of breath, and frequent respiratory infections.

    COLLABORATION PROCESS

    The patient's primary care nurse, Sarah, collaborates remotely with a team of healthcare
    professionals, including a pulmonologist, a respiratory therapist, and a pharmacist, to provide
    evidence-based care for COPD.

    • Sarah: "Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining this virtual meeting to discuss
    the care of our patient with COPD. Based on the patient's symptoms and medical
    history, I believe he would benefit from a comprehensive treatment plan. I would like to
    hear your input and recommendations."

    • Pulmonologist: "Thank you, Sarah. I have reviewed the patient's medical records and
    pulmonary function test results. I agree that the patient has COPD and requires a
    comprehensive treatment plan. I recommend initiating bronchodilator therapy, including
    long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, to improve his lung function and
    reduce symptoms."

    • Respiratory Therapist: "I have been conducting remote pulmonary rehabilitation
    sessions with the patient to improve his exercise capacity and quality of life. These

    2

    sessions include breathing exercises, physical activity guidance, and education on
    managing exacerbations. I have noticed significant improvements in the patient's
    exercise tolerance and breathlessness."

    • Pharmacist: "I have reviewed the patient's medication list and potential drug
    interactions. It is crucial to ensure that the patient understands the proper use of inhalers
    and medications, as well as the importance of adherence. I recommend providing
    education and counseling to the patient and his family on the correct inhaler technique
    and potential side effects."

    • Sarah: "Thank you all for your valuable input. I will incorporate your recommendations
    into the patient's treatment plan. Let's schedule regular virtual follow-up visits to monitor
    his progress, adjust medications if necessary, and provide ongoing support."

    Consider additional consultations that might be necessary as you develop your plan of care for
    this patient.

    **## Instructions.Assessment3.docx**

    **This assignment is a video, I need a script, per se to make the video**

    Propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Review the case study in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. You will use this case study as the focus for this assessment. (See Attachment)

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10-minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video:

    · Propose an evidence-based care plan that you believe will improve the safety and outcomes of the patient in the case study presented in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. Add your thoughts on what more could be done for the patient and what more information may have been needed.

    · Discuss the ways in which an EBP model and relevant evidence helped you to develop and make decisions about the plan you proposed

    · Wrap up your video by identifying the benefits of the remote collaboration in the scenario, as well as discuss strategies you found in the literature or best practices that could help mitigate or overcome one or more of the collaboration challenges you observed in the scenario.

    Be sure you mention any articles, authors, and other relevant sources of evidence that helped inform your video. Discuss why these sources of evidence are credible and relevant.
    **Important**: You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list of the sources you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. You are required to submit a narrative of all your video content to this assessment and to SafeAssign.

    Make sure that your video addresses the following grading criteria:

    · Propose your own evidence-based care plan to improve the safety and outcomes for a patient in the provided case study.

    · Explain the ways in which you used an EBP model to help develop your plan of care for the client.

    · Reflect on which evidence you found in your search that was most relevant and useful when making decisions regarding your care plan.

    · Identify benefits and strategies to mitigate the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team.

    · Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar, including a reference list formatted in current APA style.

    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    **DO NOT USE AI**

    **REFERENCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD**

    **## nurs-fpx4030-assessment-04-supplement-remote-collaboration-and-evidence-based-care-C.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 04 –

    Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care

    Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence-
    based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine
    how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first review the case study
    below.

    INTRODUCTION

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung disease that causes
    restricted airflow and breathing problems. Providing evidence-based care for COPD can be
    challenging, especially when care is being provided remotely. In this case study, we will observe
    how healthcare professionals collaborate remotely and virtually to provide care for a patient with
    COPD.

    PATIENT INFORMATION

    The patient is a 70-year-old male diagnosed with COPD. He lives in a rural area and has limited
    access to specialized pulmonary care. The patient experiences symptoms such as chronic
    cough, shortness of breath, and frequent respiratory infections.

    COLLABORATION PROCESS

    The patient's primary care nurse, Sarah, collaborates remotely with a team of healthcare
    professionals, including a pulmonologist, a respiratory therapist, and a pharmacist, to provide
    evidence-based care for COPD.

    • Sarah: "Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining this virtual meeting to discuss
    the care of our patient with COPD. Based on the patient's symptoms and medical
    history, I believe he would benefit from a comprehensive treatment plan. I would like to
    hear your input and recommendations."

    • Pulmonologist: "Thank you, Sarah. I have reviewed the patient's medical records and
    pulmonary function test results. I agree that the patient has COPD and requires a
    comprehensive treatment plan. I recommend initiating bronchodilator therapy, including
    long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, to improve his lung function and
    reduce symptoms."

    • Respiratory Therapist: "I have been conducting remote pulmonary rehabilitation
    sessions with the patient to improve his exercise capacity and quality of life. These

    2

    sessions include breathing exercises, physical activity guidance, and education on
    managing exacerbations. I have noticed significant improvements in the patient's
    exercise tolerance and breathlessness."

    • Pharmacist: "I have reviewed the patient's medication list and potential drug
    interactions. It is crucial to ensure that the patient understands the proper use of inhalers
    and medications, as well as the importance of adherence. I recommend providing
    education and counseling to the patient and his family on the correct inhaler technique
    and potential side effects."

    • Sarah: "Thank you all for your valuable input. I will incorporate your recommendations
    into the patient's treatment plan. Let's schedule regular virtual follow-up visits to monitor
    his progress, adjust medications if necessary, and provide ongoing support."

    Consider additional consultations that might be necessary as you develop your plan of care for
    this patient.

    **## Instructions.Assessment3.docx**

    **This assignment is a video, I need a script, per se to make the video**

    Propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

    Review the case study in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. You will use this case study as the focus for this assessment. (See Attachment)

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10-minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video:

    · Propose an evidence-based care plan that you believe will improve the safety and outcomes of the patient in the case study presented in the
    [Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42206/files/7646357/download?download_frd=1) resource. Add your thoughts on what more could be done for the patient and what more information may have been needed.

    · Discuss the ways in which an EBP model and relevant evidence helped you to develop and make decisions about the plan you proposed

    · Wrap up your video by identifying the benefits of the remote collaboration in the scenario, as well as discuss strategies you found in the literature or best practices that could help mitigate or overcome one or more of the collaboration challenges you observed in the scenario.

    Be sure you mention any articles, authors, and other relevant sources of evidence that helped inform your video. Discuss why these sources of evidence are credible and relevant.
    **Important**: You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list of the sources you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. You are required to submit a narrative of all your video content to this assessment and to SafeAssign.

    Make sure that your video addresses the following grading criteria:

    · Propose your own evidence-based care plan to improve the safety and outcomes for a patient in the provided case study.

    · Explain the ways in which you used an EBP model to help develop your plan of care for the client.

    · Reflect on which evidence you found in your search that was most relevant and useful when making decisions regarding your care plan.

    · Identify benefits and strategies to mitigate the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team.

    · Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar, including a reference list formatted in current APA style.

    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    **DO NOT USE AI**

    **REFERENCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD**

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] multicultural communications

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering multicultural communications.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week 4 of 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week 4 of 5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] case study 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx** Page 2 **PSY1010**– **Touchstone 3.1** Type Your Name Here ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**–
    **Touchstone 3.1**

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As of late, Monica has been noticing that Jordan spends a lot of time focusing on what his friends think about him. Without his mother’s permission, Jordan recently crawled out of his bedroom window and went to a party when he was supposed to be studying for an exam. Upon his return home, Jordan reeked of alcohol and marijuana and was caught by his mother. Shocked and appalled by her son's recent behavior, she grounded him for two weeks.

    Date here

    Using what you have learned about the adolescent brain and social development, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Your goals are to help Monica understand why her son makes the choices he does and recommend some strategies that may help solve the problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What happens inside the brain of a teenager that makes it difficult for Jordan to weigh the risks and rewards of his behavior? Describe how the adolescent brain weighs risk and reward.

    **Question 2:** Why does it appear that Jordan values the opinion of his peers more than the opinion of his mother? Explain the psychological concepts that may account for why Jordan places value on his peers’ opinions.

    **Question 3:** What advice would you give Jordan’s mother, Monica, that would teach him how to make better choices and decisions? Discuss a specific strategy that Monica may implement to help her son make better decisions.

    **Question 4:** If you were in Monica’s shoes, how would you feel? Explain why a better understanding of Monica’s perspective could result in more constructive advice.

    **## PSY1010_CaseStudy1_Template.docx**

    Page 2

    **PSY1010**–
    **Touchstone 3.1**

    Type Your Name Here

    ## Smarter Decisions through Psychology

    SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As of late, Monica has been noticing that Jordan spends a lot of time focusing on what his friends think about him. Without his mother’s permission, Jordan recently crawled out of his bedroom window and went to a party when he was supposed to be studying for an exam. Upon his return home, Jordan reeked of alcohol and marijuana and was caught by his mother. Shocked and appalled by her son's recent behavior, she grounded him for two weeks.

    Date here

    Using what you have learned about the adolescent brain and social development, answer the questions in this case study assignment. Your goals are to help Monica understand why her son makes the choices he does and recommend some strategies that may help solve the problem.

    For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a resource.

    **Question 1:** What happens inside the brain of a teenager that makes it difficult for Jordan to weigh the risks and rewards of his behavior? Describe how the adolescent brain weighs risk and reward.

    **Question 2:** Why does it appear that Jordan values the opinion of his peers more than the opinion of his mother? Explain the psychological concepts that may account for why Jordan places value on his peers’ opinions.

    **Question 3:** What advice would you give Jordan’s mother, Monica, that would teach him how to make better choices and decisions? Discuss a specific strategy that Monica may implement to help her son make better decisions.

    **Question 4:** If you were in Monica’s shoes, how would you feel? Explain why a better understanding of Monica’s perspective could result in more constructive advice.

  • [Solved] what is writing?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering what is writing?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_2643.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2643-jpeg "IMG_2643.jpeg") \ IMG_2648.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2648-jpeg-10352367 "IMG_2648.jpeg") \ IMG_2641.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2641-jpeg-10352369 "IMG_2641.jpeg") \ IMG_2642.jpeg](https://www.sw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_2643.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2643-jpeg "IMG_2643.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2648.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2648-jpeg-10352367 "IMG_2648.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2641.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2641-jpeg-10352369 "IMG_2641.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2642.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2642-jpeg-10352371 "IMG_2642.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2647.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2647-jpeg "IMG_2647.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_2644.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2644-jpeg "IMG_2644.jpeg")

  • [Solved] History Homework for Dual

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering History Homework for Dual.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully. – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf – IMG_2654.jpeg – IMG_2652.jpeg – IMG_2653.jpeg **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf** Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

    – ## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf

    – IMG_2654.jpeg
    – IMG_2652.jpeg
    – IMG_2653.jpeg

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    **## PSY-495Rubric-Benchmark-MethodsRevisionandEthicalConsiderations.pdf**

    Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

    Rubric

    Introduction Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

    statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

    problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

    problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

    missing.

    Collapse All

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 1 of 11

    Participants Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

    any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

    of participants needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

    written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

    coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

    incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

    details.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 2 of 11

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

    study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

    the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 3 of 11

    Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

    Criteria Description

    List what is needed to conduct the study.

    5. Target 10 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

    insightful with exceptional details.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

    details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

    somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

    many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 4 of 11

    Procedures Section 15 points

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 5 of 11

    Criteria Description

    Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

    to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

    researcher could replicate your study.

    5. Target 15 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

    researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

    directions.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

    replicate the study from these directions.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

    conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

    lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

    fully replicate the study from these directions.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

    procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

    researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 6 of 11

    Design Section 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

    groups.

    5. Target 15 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

    comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

    is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

    limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

    Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the design of the study and how participants are

    assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 7 of 11

    Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

    Criteria Description

    Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

    minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

    participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

    depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

    5. Target 15 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

    exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 12.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

    3. Approaching 11.25 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

    details or clarity.

    2. Insufficient 9.75 points

    Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

    vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

    important details.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 8 of 11

    Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

    Criteria Description

    Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

    5. Target 10 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

    4. Acceptable 8.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    clear, appropriate and has strong details.

    3. Approaching 7.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

    2. Insufficient 6.5 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

    missing.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 9 of 11

    Mechanics of Writing 6 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

    sentence structure, etc.

    5. Target 6 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

    sentence structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 5.1 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

    sentence structure are used.

    3. Approaching 4.5 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

    generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 3.9 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

    Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

    recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

    Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

    throughout.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 10 of 11

    Format/Documentation 4 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

    level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 4 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 3.4 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

    errors.

    3. Approaching 3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

    are some obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 2.6 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

    Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

    provided.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/PSY-495-O500-20250609/rubrics/26a80cb0-e87f-4a93-94df-eeb864cc64b4 7/17/25, 2:54 AM
    Page 11 of 11

    **IMG_2654.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2654-jpeg-10352381)

    **IMG_2652.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2652-jpeg-10352383)

    **IMG_2653.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2653-jpeg-10352385)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4